@ aceninja: thanks for shedding another, important light to the debate. I agree with the framework you set, but not how you fill it in. Yes, it's important that men and women work together, that we step beyond stereotypes, and that we act selflessly.
At the same time I would like to pose some counterquestions:
- what can possibly be confrontational about a pregnancy or about naturally-shaped breast? Who has thrown the baby out with bath water, the one who instructs women (and men also but to a lesser degree) their bodies should look in a certain way, or the one who claims back her/his power?
I do agree with one thing: once we (men AND women) claim back our power, we should be prepared for "negative" reactions from others, since by the very act itself we will be a threat to traditional structures. When you truly stand in your power, no reaction from anyone can bug you or harm you anymore.
- isn't a pregnancy the most amazing sign of bringing forth a new life, and thus divine in itself and should be honored as such? And yes, this is beyond cliches - I know a man who just adores pregnant women and finds them even more attractive than non-pregnant women
- concerning feminism: I think the only way to bring the balance back in families is stepping beyond the hunter-gatherer cliche, so that both mom and dad or both moms and both dads can take responsibility, financially, emotionally and in whatever other way as parent. So many configurations are possible (both parents working, one working, one stay at home) and the strength versus emotion paradigm i.m.h.o. is an old world classification that does not do justice to the capacities of each individual. Some men are more "ying" and some women are more "yang"...
I'd like to close off with quote by Eckhart Tolle, from a "new earth", which gives us all something to think about from a historical perspective (which again, I think is shifting):
"The suppression of the feminine principle especially over the past two thousand years has enabled the ego to gain absolute supremacy in the collective human psyche. Although women have egos, of course, the ego can take root and grow more easily in the male form than in the female. This is because women are less mind-identified than men. (...) The female form is less rigidly encapsulated than the male, has greater openness and sensitivity toward other life forms, and is more attuned to the natural world.
If the balance between male and female energies had not been destroyed on our planet, the ego's growth would have been greatly curtailed. We would not have declared war on nature, and we would not be so completely alienated from our Being.
Nobody knows the exact figure (...) but it seems certain that during a three-hundred-year period between three and five million women were tortured and killed by the "Holy Inquisition" (...). The sacred feminine was declared demonic, and an entire dimension largely disappeared from human experience. (...) Women's status was reduced to being child bearers and men's property. Male who denied the feminine within themselves were now running the world ... The rest is history or rather a case history of insanity. (...) What is it that suddenly made men feel threatened by the female? The evolving ego in them. It knew it could gain full control of our planet only through the male form, and to do so, it had to render the female powerless.
In time, the ego also took over most women, although it could never become as deeply entrenched in them as in men. We now have a situation in which the suppression of the feminine has become internalized, even in most women. The sacred feminine, because it is suppressed, is felt by many women as emotional pain. In fact, it has become part of their pain-body, together with the accumulated pain suffered by women over millennia through childbirth, rape, slavery, torture and violent death." (p. 155-157)
Interestingly, Tolle describes how this pain body become active before and during menstruation (hence, PMS)...