Thread: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

1. Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A1...3290536575C723[/video]

"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent!" (About 1 Billion People!)

From the article at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_va...ill_Gates.html
NaturalNews) In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for People) -- might be reduced. He says:

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

You can watch this yourself at:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A...

Reducing the world population through vaccines
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"

Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it helps.

Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help almost no one from a scientific point of view (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_v...), it raises the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the first place?

Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. Once again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A...

How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't be very effective.

And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.

Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population:

#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.

#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages (http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_v...).

#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic. Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.

This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study documenting this was published in PLoS. Read the story here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_s...

Here's the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus? PLoS Med 7(4): e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259

The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15 percent, as Bill Gates suggested).

Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all in the name of health care!

The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the "hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting people all over the world. One such program is researching the development of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use specially-coated nano-materials to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.

More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration" solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_v...)

It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.

Who will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.

I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!" (Their words, not mine.)

In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious we are not alone in the universe.

If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it may be precisely what they are thinking.

In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates you don't believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you even from mild infections.

Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any government care about protecting your health, either?

As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people" then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)

As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what we've discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people increases the death rate of the population.

My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.

Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question what they're being told to do by their own corrupt governments.

• Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines

• Facebook crowdsourced investigation exposes vaccine denials of SIGA Technologies

• The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your child's health

• Flu vaccines revealed as the greatest quackery ever pushed in the history of medicine

• Vaccines cause autism: Supporting evidence

• Are mandatory vaccinations acts of violence against children?

Related video from NaturalNews.TV

Your NaturalNews.TV video could be here.

About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher, author and award-winning journalist with a strong interest in personal health, the environment and the power of nature to help us all heal He is a prolific writer and has published thousands of articles, interviews, reports and consumer guides, reaching millions of readers with information that is saving lives and improving personal health around the world. Adams is a trusted, independent journalist who receives no money or promotional fees whatsoever to write about other companies' products. In 2010, Adams created NaturalNews.TV, a natural living video sharing site featuring thousands of user videos on foods, fitness, green living and more. He's also a successful software entrepreneur, having founded a well known email marketing software company whose technology currently powers the NaturalNews email newsletters. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and enjoys outdoor activities, nature photography, Pilates and martial arts training. Known on the 'net as 'the Health Ranger,' Adams shares his ethics, mission statements and personal health statistics at www.HealthRanger.org

2. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

It's funny how the PTB create the mass problem then try to make the people feel guilty about it.

They create GM food to destroy the farm lands and stave us, then they say there is not enough food.
They keep emissions up on factories and cars then then blame us for consumption.
They hold back Zero point energy for there gas guzzlers and blame us for lack of oil.
They create a depression and job loss and blame us for being lazy.

Sorry But really i don't feel much like making a huge list but I am sure most of us know the deal any way.
Beside I know I am preaching to the choir on this, UGG

This rant brought to you by..........
LOL

3. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

This is very valuable information..

So many "lay" people have never even seen Bill Gates, let alone hear him talk. Many people just ..hear about him...

His logic seems sound.. His intent, seems positive...

yet something still irqs me..

4. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/am....html?hpt=Sbin

US apologizes for infecting Guatemalans with STDs in the 1940s. When are they going to apologize to the world for AIDS, H1N1, vaccinations, etc.?

5. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

I've heard Bill Gates on talk shows before when they first set up their foundation where he says if third world countries had vaccinations then women would't feel the need to have 8 or 10 children just to get 2 or 3 to make it to adulthood (sometimes most of the 8 or 10 might make it to 13-14 yrs old and procreate) Is it possible that he and Melinda have their hearts in the right place but maybe they are uninformed ? I don't agree with vaccinations either but there seems to be alot of variables. It would be interesting to see if the "same" vaccines are used on everyone especially if that particular area of that particular country has a valuable resource to be harvested. Also haven't the vaccines in the US and elsewhere got stronger and stronger because of our parents and grand parents having them. If so will a first world country of "1st time vaccines" of the same strength be harmful to them?

6. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

Bill Gates seems to be on the inside track. He already has a place in the underground bunkers in case of a cataclysmic event. He knows he has no risk on the population reduction scheme, because his money and personal achievements guarantee that he will be saved and granted safe harbor. I hope his Karma is in balance.

7. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

Seems to me if we quit BOMBING stuff...we'd make a big dent in that CO2 thing.

8. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

Is it possible that he and Melinda have their hearts in the right place but maybe they are uninformed ?
You know, I have a feeling that his intentions may very well be good, but that's not to say there aren't any "inside groups" supporting and influencing him in some way. This makes me think back to president Harding and his administration. Harding was a reasonable fellow with good intentions, but his administration went down in history as one of absolute corruption.

But who really knows? It just seems more logical to think that Bill Gates and his wife are trying to help the world, but don't fully understand the implications of the organizations they might be dealing with.

9. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

[QUOTE=Ethereal Blue Being;56022]I've heard Bill Gates on talk shows before when they first set up their foundation where he says if third world countries had vaccinations then women would't feel the need to have 8 or 10 children just to get 2 or 3 to make it to adulthood (sometimes most of the 8 or 10 might make it to 13-14 yrs old and procreate) Is it possible that he and Melinda have their hearts in the right place but maybe they are uninformed ?

That does shed a different light on the question, and of course, one would rather think that the Gates intentions are good, but I still think that Gates is Illuminati. The whole "science" behind vaccines was wrong from the start, and there is plenty of evidence showing that, so this big push now for vaccines is highly suspicious. I think there is a very dark angenda behind it.

10. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

You are all probably right about the Gates even if the motive is self preservation to vaccinate those countries to help prevent viral pandemics that have mutated from coming to the US, Europe etc.

11. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

Reproductive health services? What are they? Abortions? Health care keeps people alive. We already have those.
I'm not sure he was saying what is being alluded to here. Why was the tape cut off there? I'd like hear what he said after that point.
Of course, this is the first time I heard him talk about these things...

12. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

Oh!... my G** !

I've just been told tht Bill Gates was on British breakfast TV this morning talking up the cyber terror threat.

With so many people feeling the Oct/Nov big whammy is probably for real, here's a thought that just occured to me.

The US elections and the cyber false-flag event could be rolled into one big whammy by using the cyber 'attack' to clobber the voting machines and so allowing the incumbents to stay on as emergency managers during the 'crisis'.

The theory behind throwing them all out in November is that it takes a year or two to corrupt the congress members so a fresh batch would hold up the agend by that long too. That's a good enough reason to think that with time as tight as it is getting, they might well wish to kill the election in a couple of weeks from now.

13. Re: Bill Gates on video cites vaccines as population control

Posted by Dale (here)
You know, I have a feeling that his intentions may very well be good, but that's not to say there aren't any "inside groups" supporting and influencing him in some way. This makes me think back to president Harding and his administration. Harding was a reasonable fellow with good intentions, but his administration went down in history as one of absolute corruption.

But who really knows? It just seems more logical to think that Bill Gates and his wife are trying to help the world, but don't fully understand the implications of the organizations they might be dealing with.
Gates might be 'trying' to help, but we have to understand that he is a product of an uninformed system. Or perhaps better said: a controlled system. Having spent some time around M.I.T., and Harvard grads, I find them to be in a very tight box of knowledge, which since they consider themselves highly educated in the best possible way, keeps them stuck. I'm not talking here about unkind, strong ego types. But of truly nice people who have bought completely into the system as they've been taught. Never recognizing, or even being able to get the smallest glimpse, that what they've been taught isn't the truth. They are exactly what the PTB wanted to produce and are their best soldiers.

Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts