Nanoo,
I think you can probably understand where Chinaski is coming from. You have made a large claim here: that we're being monitored by a very specific number of groups and people.
And you've arrived at these figures via intuition, which means none of us can verify it.
Also, you've declined to answer which groups, as you've said it would be unproductive to do so.
And that's fine. It's your prerogative. Nobody is denying the real power of intuition, and nobody is questioning your right to freely express yourself.
Further, nobody is saying you're straight-up wrong.
Having said that, and without judgement, I would suggest to you that you try to understand why some will have questions, doubts, and concerns about the info you've shared.
Even some, including myself, who tend to believe we are being monitored, will have questions about your process and would feel helped by more specific information.
Posted by Nanoo Nanoo (here)
I think you are back peddling there a little.Posted by Chinaski (here)
hi Nanoo,
i'm not offended that you used your intuition. the numbers you used were just misleading - to me, anyway.
we matter. absolutely we do. even if there's just 500 of us. I think of the parent who diligently monitors his son or daughter - but no matter how diligent they are, the kid is likely to experiment with drugs, have unprotected sex, and so on. does that mean the parent doesn't matter? is useless? of course not. I think it's the pull of that parent that causes the kid to *not go any further, to not become irreversibly destructive*. we keep hearing about the illuminatti's plans to do this and that, and yet it seems the can is being continually kicked down the road. why? well, I think we (and others like us) have something to do with that - even if it's just in a small way. but can we *stop* them?
this illuminatti plan has been in effect for thousands of years mate. they have contingency plans upon contingency plans, and it's gonna take a lot more than a few thousand keyboard warriors to stop them. perhaps we can slow them down a bit...not sure.
I think it's healthy to have a semi-tongue in cheek attitude towards the forum. not because the subject matter isn't of vital importance, but because it *is*. I think we lose when we become too serious, and that's basically the point of my original post here.
p.s. love ya Zeb
The question here is security. People here, especially newbies possibly wont suspect things like this happening here.. but they are , and im woried more about our personal security .. forget privacy , that went out the door long ago.
Can you qualify your statement ?
" i'm not offended that you used your intuition. the numbers you used were just misleading - to me, anyway. "
if my intuitive number was misleading does this mean you have a more accurate number to compare it to ? in order for a number to be mis leading then you must have a better idea ... if so can you share it with us ?
N