+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 5
Results 81 to 96 of 96

Thread: "We think something happened in the ocean."

  1. Link to Post #81
    Sweden Avalon Member transiten's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Posts
    1,760
    Thanks
    7,373
    Thanked 10,075 times in 1,638 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    I've had this "Weissung der Cree" on my 12stringed guitar for 30 years:

    Wenn der letzte Baum gerodet
    der letzte fluss Vergiftet
    der letzte Fish gefangen
    werdet ihr feststellen
    dass man Geld nicht essen kann!

    When the last Tree has been cut down
    the last River has been poisoned
    the last Fish has been caught
    you will realize
    that you cannot eat Money

  2. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to transiten For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (28th October 2013), CD7 (20th October 2013), justntime2learn (23rd May 2016), Kindred (21st October 2013), Knowrainknowrainbows! (20th October 2013), Kristin (20th October 2013), Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), skamandar (20th October 2013), skippy (20th October 2013), Spirithorse (23rd May 2016), spiritwind (20th October 2013), Wind (20th October 2013)

  3. Link to Post #82
    Sweden Avalon Member transiten's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th June 2011
    Posts
    1,760
    Thanks
    7,373
    Thanked 10,075 times in 1,638 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Now on Swedish radio they are talking about Gold telling the story about King Midas who had his wish come true that everything he touched would turn to gold. But then also his food turned to gold hence he almost starved to death before the Gods had mercy upon him and released the spell.

    Seems like you can't eat gold either Sync sync
    Last edited by transiten; 20th October 2013 at 12:28.

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to transiten For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (28th October 2013), CD7 (20th October 2013), Inaiá (20th October 2013), Kindred (21st October 2013), Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), skippy (20th October 2013), spiritwind (20th October 2013), Swanette (20th October 2013)

  5. Link to Post #83
    Avalon Member Kindred's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th February 2011
    Location
    At Peace, within the Noise
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,110
    Thanks
    2,101
    Thanked 5,323 times in 995 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    The Ocean is Broken
    http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18...-broken/?cs=12

    I can't imagine Why???
    This was just 'the beginning'...

    Chernobyl, Fukishima and the use of depleted uranium munitions across the world are just another part of the puzzle.

    You don't necessarily need a nuclear war to create a world-wide nuclear holocaust.

    Will life persist?... certainly... just not in the way we know it, for a few thousand years or so.
    Life is like that.

    To get a 'taste' of what it will be like, read Thiaoouba Prophesy... the part that reflects this issue comes up quite soon in the book. http://www.thiaoouba.com/mic.htm

    In Unity, Peace and Love
    Last edited by Kindred; 20th October 2013 at 14:52.
    “A wizard is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to.”
    - Gandalf (J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring)

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Kindred For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (20th October 2013), exponentialist (21st October 2013), Knowrainknowrainbows! (20th October 2013), Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), sheme (20th October 2013), Wind (20th October 2013)

  7. Link to Post #84
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th June 2010
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    62
    Posts
    439
    Thanks
    9,800
    Thanked 2,067 times in 364 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Not sure how to reconcile this story with the rest of this thread -- are they 2 different species of salmon?

    http://www.thesewardphoenixlog.com/s...ever/1954.html

    2013 top commercial salmon season, ever

    October 17, 2013 | Vol. 48, No. 9 | View PDF


    As expected, Alaska’s 2013 salmon catch is one for the record books. Early tallies by state fishery managers show that fishermen caught 272 million salmon this summer, smashing the previous record of 221 million salmon in 2005. The fishery was powered by a whopping catch of 219 million pinks.

    In terms of money, the preliminary harvest value of $691 million ranks second to the $724 million of 1988, called an “outlier” season by salmon managers. They also predict that once all post-season bonuses and price adjustments are determined by salmon processors, the 2013 season could be the most valuable salmon harvest in Alaska’s history.

    Some highlights: For the second year running. Southeast again claims the title for the Alaska region with the highest salmon volumes and overall value. Fishermen caught more than 100 million salmon for the first time ever, valued at nearly $220 million at the Panhandle docks.
    Before you speak, ask yourself, is it kind, is it necessary, is it true, does it improve on the silence?

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Alan For This Post:

    johnf (20th October 2013), Kindred (21st October 2013), onawah (20th October 2013), Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), Swanette (20th October 2013), TargeT (22nd October 2013)

  9. Link to Post #85
    United States Avalon Member johnf's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,211
    Thanks
    8,460
    Thanked 6,364 times in 1,115 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Quote Posted by alamojo (here)
    Not sure how to reconcile this story with the rest of this thread -- are they 2 different species of salmon?

    http://www.thesewardphoenixlog.com/s...ever/1954.html
    Indeed it is getting confusing for me too. Yes Chinook, and Pink salmon are two different species.
    My understanding is that the Chinook tend to feed more on the larger food.
    The pink salmon is very plankton focussed.

    Here is another thing that is coming up.

    http://gma.yahoo.com/second-sea-serp...opstories.html

    Just thinking out loud here, in the case of the massive fish die offs, the media gives no understood reason.
    Same here with the rare occurrence of dead oarfish washing up.
    Is there something that occurs with the electromagnetic fields in the ocean that can kill without various biologists
    being able to say what happened to cause it?
    The study of the ocean is really the study of the planet, the whole area of magnetosphere changes, and all the effects they can cause is
    not something I think the scientific community really has a handle on yet, but is off course a huge bundle of factors.

    jf
    "I am fascinated by religion. (That's a completely different thing from believing in it!)" Douglas Adams

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to johnf For This Post:

    4evrneo (22nd October 2013), Alan (20th October 2013), Kindred (21st October 2013), Kristin (20th October 2013), Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), spiritwind (21st October 2013)

  11. Link to Post #86
    Avalon Member Kindred's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th February 2011
    Location
    At Peace, within the Noise
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,110
    Thanks
    2,101
    Thanked 5,323 times in 995 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    [QUOTE=johnf;746814]
    Quote Posted by alamojo (here)
    Here is another thing that is coming up.

    http://gma.yahoo.com/second-sea-serp...opstories.html

    Just thinking out loud here, in the case of the massive fish die offs, the media gives no understood reason.
    Same here with the rare occurrence of dead oarfish washing up.
    Is there something that occurs with the electromagnetic fields in the ocean that can kill without various biologists
    being able to say what happened to cause it?
    The study of the ocean is really the study of the planet, the whole area of magnetosphere changes, and all the effects they can cause is
    not something I think the scientific community really has a handle on yet, but is off course a huge bundle of factors.

    jf
    See Suspicious0bservers video from today, regarding the 'sea serpent'... he posits a theory about the timing of these creatures washing up.


    In Unity, Peace and Love
    Last edited by Kindred; 20th October 2013 at 20:11.
    “A wizard is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to.”
    - Gandalf (J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring)

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kindred For This Post:

    Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), Wind (21st October 2013)

  13. Link to Post #87
    Canada Avalon Member DeDukshyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2011
    Location
    From 100 Mile House ;-)
    Language
    English
    Age
    50
    Posts
    9,394
    Thanks
    29,779
    Thanked 45,466 times in 8,541 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Interesting that fukishima and even chernobyl get mentioned over and over again in this thread. What about a million tons of Corexit dumped directly into the ocean? Not to mention hundreds of millions of barrels of crude ....

    Another possibility is that 2012 saw a very unusually strong salmon run. It may have been just a one off event, but the fishing industries planned for the equal in 2013, and vastly overfished ...

    Just some thoughts.

    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    [QUOTE=Kindred;746857]
    Quote Posted by johnf (here)
    Quote Posted by alamojo (here)
    Here is another thing that is coming up.

    http://gma.yahoo.com/second-sea-serp...opstories.html

    Just thinking out loud here, in the case of the massive fish die offs, the media gives no understood reason.
    Same here with the rare occurrence of dead oarfish washing up.
    Is there something that occurs with the electromagnetic fields in the ocean that can kill without various biologists
    being able to say what happened to cause it?
    The study of the ocean is really the study of the planet, the whole area of magnetosphere changes, and all the effects they can cause is
    not something I think the scientific community really has a handle on yet, but is off course a huge bundle of factors.

    jf
    See Suspicious0bservers video from today, regarding the 'sea serpent'... he posits a theory about the timing of these creatures washing up.


    In Unity, Peace and Love
    Most of these videos circulating of "sea serpents" are oarfish. Also, if sea serpents are there, they have always been there, not suddenly appear out of no where to eat millions of salmon.
    When you are one step ahead of the crowd, you are a genius.
    Two steps ahead, and you are deemed a crackpot.

  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to DeDukshyn For This Post:

    4evrneo (22nd October 2013), conk (30th October 2013), Kindred (21st October 2013), Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), SKIBADABOMSKI (21st October 2013), TargeT (22nd October 2013)

  15. Link to Post #88
    Avalon Member Kindred's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th February 2011
    Location
    At Peace, within the Noise
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,110
    Thanks
    2,101
    Thanked 5,323 times in 995 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Quote Posted by DeDukshyn (here)
    Interesting that fukishima and even chernobyl get mentioned over and over again in this thread. What about a million tons of Corexit dumped directly into the ocean? Not to mention hundreds of millions of barrels of crude ....

    Another possibility is that 2012 saw a very unusually strong salmon run. It may have been just a one off event, but the fishing industries planned for the equal in 2013, and vastly overfished ...

    Just some thoughts.[COLOR="red"]

    Most of these videos circulating of "sea serpents" are oarfish. Also, if sea serpents are there, they have always been there, not suddenly appear out of no where to eat millions of salmon.
    Yes... oarfish (I couldn't remember the name when I posted this piece - that's why I put sea serpent in quotes)... which many attribute to the concept of 'sea serpents' from the time of when sailing across the globe became more common.

    And, Yes, the Corexit is certainly of concern, but primarily in the Atlantic... these oarfish have been washing up in the Pacific. As stated in my previous post, Suspicious0bservers makes an important point about the timing of these creatures arriving on shore... well worth the few minutes to comprehend the various goings-on at present.

    In Unity, Peace and Love
    “A wizard is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to.”
    - Gandalf (J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring)

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kindred For This Post:

    DeDukshyn (22nd October 2013), johnf (21st October 2013)

  17. Link to Post #89
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,272
    Thanks
    47,766
    Thanked 116,612 times in 20,703 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Can you give us a more specific place to start with that, please?
    Is it in a particular chapter of the book, and is there a link for it?
    Thank you.
    Quote Posted by Kindred (here)

    To get a 'taste' of what it will be like, read Thiaoouba Prophesy... the part that reflects this issue comes up quite soon in the book. http://www.thiaoouba.com/mic.htm

    In Unity, Peace and Love
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Kindred (21st October 2013)

  19. Link to Post #90
    Avalon Member Kindred's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th February 2011
    Location
    At Peace, within the Noise
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,110
    Thanks
    2,101
    Thanked 5,323 times in 995 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Can you give us a more specific place to start with that, please?
    Is it in a particular chapter of the book, and is there a link for it?
    Thank you.
    Quote Posted by Kindred (here)

    To get a 'taste' of what it will be like, read Thiaoouba Prophesy... the part that reflects this issue comes up quite soon in the book. http://www.thiaoouba.com/mic.htm

    In Unity, Peace and Love
    If you scroll down the link I originally provided, you'll see a link for a free copy. http://www.thiaoouba.com/mic.htm

    It can also be read online (but no chapters noted), but can be tedious to do so.

    Main link for this item is here (some absolutely Great stories of visitations): http://www.galactic-server.net/linkmap.html

    The part I was describing begins near the end of the first page of the on-line 'book'. Just the same, I encourage anyone to get a copy and read the whole thing. It contains much spiritual knowledge and universal wisdom. One point I will make... I KNOW this is Not 'science fiction', and is an accurate account of the author.

    In Unity, Peace and Love
    “A wizard is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to.”
    - Gandalf (J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring)

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kindred For This Post:

    4evrneo (22nd October 2013), onawah (21st October 2013)

  21. Link to Post #91
    Brazil Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th June 2011
    Location
    Belo Horizonte, Brazil
    Age
    40
    Posts
    3,857
    Thanks
    18,436
    Thanked 24,127 times in 3,536 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Hey folks,

    Check this out:

    Quote IT was the silence that made this voyage different from all of those before it.

    Not the absence of sound, exactly.

    The wind still whipped the sails and whistled in the rigging. The waves still sloshed against the fibreglass hull.

    And there were plenty of other noises: muffled thuds and bumps and scrapes as the boat knocked against pieces of debris.

    What was missing was the cries of the seabirds which, on all previous similar voyages, had surrounded the boat.

    The birds were missing because the fish were missing.

    Exactly 10 years before, when Newcastle yachtsman Ivan Macfadyen had sailed exactly the same course from Melbourne to Osaka, all he'd had to do to catch a fish from the ocean between Brisbane and Japan was throw out a baited line.

    "There was not one of the 28 days on that portion of the trip when we didn't catch a good-sized fish to cook up and eat with some rice," Macfadyen recalled.

    But this time, on that whole long leg of sea journey, the total catch was two.

    No fish. No birds. Hardly a sign of life at all.

    "In years gone by I'd gotten used to all the birds and their noises," he said.

    "They'd be following the boat, sometimes resting on the mast before taking off again. You'd see flocks of them wheeling over the surface of the sea in the distance, feeding on pilchards."

    But in March and April this year, only silence and desolation surrounded his boat, Funnel Web, as it sped across the surface of a haunted ocean.

    North of the equator, up above New Guinea, the ocean-racers saw a big fishing boat working a reef in the distance.

    "All day it was there, trawling back and forth. It was a big ship, like a mother-ship," he said.

    And all night it worked too, under bright floodlights. And in the morning Macfadyen was awoken by his crewman calling out, urgently, that the ship had launched a speedboat.

    "Obviously I was worried. We were unarmed and pirates are a real worry in those waters. I thought, if these guys had weapons then we were in deep trouble."

    But they weren't pirates, not in the conventional sense, at least. The speedboat came alongside and the Melanesian men aboard offered gifts of fruit and jars of jam and preserves.

    "And they gave us five big sugar-bags full of fish," he said.

    "They were good, big fish, of all kinds. Some were fresh, but others had obviously been in the sun for a while.

    "We told them there was no way we could possibly use all those fish. There were just two of us, with no real place to store or keep them. They just shrugged and told us to tip them overboard. That's what they would have done with them anyway, they said.

    "They told us that his was just a small fraction of one day's by-catch. That they were only interested in tuna and to them, everything else was rubbish. It was all killed, all dumped. They just trawled that reef day and night and stripped it of every living thing."

    Macfadyen felt sick to his heart. That was one fishing boat among countless more working unseen beyond the horizon, many of them doing exactly the same thing.

    No wonder the sea was dead. No wonder his baited lines caught nothing. There was nothing to catch.

    If that sounds depressing, it only got worse.

    The next leg of the long voyage was from Osaka to San Francisco and for most of that trip the desolation was tinged with nauseous horror and a degree of fear.

    "After we left Japan, it felt as if the ocean itself was dead," Macfadyen said.

    "We hardly saw any living things. We saw one whale, sort of rolling helplessly on the surface with what looked like a big tumour on its head. It was pretty sickening.

    "I've done a lot of miles on the ocean in my life and I'm used to seeing turtles, dolphins, sharks and big flurries of feeding birds. But this time, for 3000 nautical miles there was nothing alive to be seen."

    In place of the missing life was garbage in astounding volumes.

    "Part of it was the aftermath of the tsunami that hit Japan a couple of years ago. The wave came in over the land, picked up an unbelievable load of stuff and carried it out to sea. And it's still out there, everywhere you look."

    Ivan's brother, Glenn, who boarded at Hawaii for the run into the United States, marvelled at the "thousands on thousands" of yellow plastic buoys. The huge tangles of synthetic rope, fishing lines and nets. Pieces of polystyrene foam by the million. And slicks of oil and petrol, everywhere.

    Countless hundreds of wooden power poles are out there, snapped off by the killer wave and still trailing their wires in the middle of the sea.

    "In years gone by, when you were becalmed by lack of wind, you'd just start your engine and motor on," Ivan said.

    Not this time.

    "In a lot of places we couldn't start our motor for fear of entangling the propeller in the mass of pieces of rope and cable. That's an unheard of situation, out in the ocean.

    "If we did decide to motor we couldn't do it at night, only in the daytime with a lookout on the bow, watching for rubbish.

    "On the bow, in the waters above Hawaii, you could see right down into the depths. I could see that the debris isn't just on the surface, it's all the way down. And it's all sizes, from a soft-drink bottle to pieces the size of a big car or truck.

    "We saw a factory chimney sticking out of the water, with some kind of boiler thing still attached below the surface. We saw a big container-type thing, just rolling over and over on the waves.

    "We were weaving around these pieces of debris. It was like sailing through a garbage tip.

    "Below decks you were constantly hearing things hitting against the hull, and you were constantly afraid of hitting something really big. As it was, the hull was scratched and dented all over the place from bits and pieces we never saw."

    Plastic was ubiquitous. Bottles, bags and every kind of throwaway domestic item you can imagine, from broken chairs to dustpans, toys and utensils.

    And something else. The boat's vivid yellow paint job, never faded by sun or sea in years gone past, reacted with something in the water off Japan, losing its sheen in a strange and unprecedented way.

    BACK in Newcastle, Ivan Macfadyen is still coming to terms with the shock and horror of the voyage.

    "The ocean is broken," he said, shaking his head in stunned disbelief.

    Recognising the problem is vast, and that no organisations or governments appear to have a particular interest in doing anything about it, Macfadyen is looking for ideas.

    He plans to lobby government ministers, hoping they might help.

    More immediately, he will approach the organisers of Australia's major ocean races, trying to enlist yachties into an international scheme that uses volunteer yachtsmen to monitor debris and marine life.

    Macfadyen signed up to this scheme while he was in the US, responding to an approach by US academics who asked yachties to fill in daily survey forms and collect samples for radiation testing - a significant concern in the wake of the tsunami and consequent nuclear power station failure in Japan.

    "I asked them why don't we push for a fleet to go and clean up the mess," he said.

    "But they said they'd calculated that the environmental damage from burning the fuel to do that job would be worse than just leaving the debris there."
    Source: http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18...-broken/?cs=12

  22. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to RMorgan For This Post:

    4evrneo (22nd October 2013), Alan (22nd October 2013), Bill Ryan (28th October 2013), BlueHeron (23rd May 2016), Christine (21st October 2013), johnf (21st October 2013), Rocky_Shorz (21st October 2013), spiritwind (21st October 2013), william r sanford72 (2nd July 2016)

  23. Link to Post #92
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Posts
    10,068
    Thanks
    12,891
    Thanked 32,308 times in 7,756 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    they say there is enough plastic in the Pacific to build New York city 3 times, with solid buildings, not just the shell...

    when the storms hit Fukushima these last few weeks, the holding tanks were going to overflow, so they opened the gates and let it pour in the ocean...

    plastic is the only thing the radiation doesn't affect in the ocean...

  24. Link to Post #93
    Avalon Member Kindred's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th February 2011
    Location
    At Peace, within the Noise
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,110
    Thanks
    2,101
    Thanked 5,323 times in 995 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    An excellent article on the Fukushima catastrophe, it's history, as well as a general background of the entire industry. It also discusses some ongoing problems that are not mentioned very often, if at all, for many years now - and for a very good reason.

    Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10...-nadesan-ph-d/
    “Japan feels energy-insecure so it embraced nuclear power and it also gave it the capacity to have on hand in a just-in-time kind of delivery system, the capacity for building nuclear weapons. So it was never about safety or what was reasonable. It was about the seductions of nuclear energy and its links to military and energy security.”–Majia Nadesan

    Again - the potential of a nuclear holocaust as described in Thiaoouba Prophesy, becomes all the more probable in light of the above information.

    Just the same, Enlightened Consciousness could make this All ... "Go Away"... in a Heartbeat.

    I look forward to that Moment.

    In Unity, Peace and Love
    “A wizard is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to.”
    - Gandalf (J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring)

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kindred For This Post:

    chocolate (30th October 2013), justntime2learn (23rd May 2016), Rocky_Shorz (30th October 2013)

  26. Link to Post #94
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,425
    Thanks
    211,625
    Thanked 459,752 times in 32,946 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    .
    This recent article in The Guardian is an opportunity to bump this important thread.

    http://theguardian.com/environment/2...st-destruction

    Great Barrier Reef: the scale of bleaching has the most sober scientists worried

    James Woodford, 17 April 2016

    I pulled on my mask and dropped off the back of the boat into the warm water above Nursery Bommie, a dive site at Agincourt Reef more than 70km offshore from Port Douglas, in far-north Queensland, Australia. It is widely regarded as one of the most spectacular tourist reefs in the area.

    As soon as I could start to make out the immense shadow of the bommie (an outcrop of coral reef) looming before me I could see that all around its flanks and on the summit, covered in just a metre of water in some places, were blemishes of white.

    The closer I got, and the more I looked, it was clear there were white patches everywhere. The bleached colonies ranged from tiny plates, shaped like an upturned hand, to areas the size of a table top. Even more striking than the snow white corals was that all around them were other corals coloured in gaudy fluorescent hues that I had never before seen on such a scale. It was as if a masterpiece of nature had been repainted with a colour scheme more befitting a pound shop.

    What I was seeing beneath me was evidence of an environmental disaster that has been unfolding over the past few months – the largest mass coral bleaching event ever recorded in this region. This bleaching is the result of a huge El Niño that has driven warm water into the western Pacific Ocean, smothering coral with temperatures beyond their tolerance.

    I have dived hundreds of times, with different teams of scientists, along the reef. I have seen the aftermath of other mass coral bleaching episodes such as the most recent major event in 2002.


    Bleached corals at Agincourt Reef. Photograph: James Woodford

    In my past experiences of bleached corals, the effect is patchy and, while one area is devastated, another will be mysteriously untouched. Yet the scale of this bleaching event has even the most sober and senior coral reef scientists worried. If the rhetoric from marine biologists is to be believed, then the Great Barrier Reef is now in the grip of a “bommie apocalypse”.

    As I continued to dive the Nursery Bommie, the fluorescent pinks, blues, purples and greens became more abundant. While these colours might look striking, they signify that the symbiotic relationship between corals and their zooxanthellae, the photosynthetic algae, has broken down.

    The fluorescent colours are always there but in healthy coral colonies the colours of the algae overwhelm those of the host coral, giving them their more typical reddish and brown hue. It is true that not all corals fluoresce, but if they have to survive for too long without the algae then bleaching becomes a death sentence.



    Put simply, the majority of the corals on this bommie – bleached or fluorescent – were clearly dead or dying. And it was not only the hard corals. All around were soft corals, still swaying like spaghetti in the ebb and flow of the ocean, that were white and ghostly. Most striking was that the bleaching was not just near the surface, where the water is warmest, but at depths of tens of metres where huge colonies of coral were white as well.

    I swam towards a wall of reef off the stern of the boat. As I approached I saw that the seafloor was covered in fragile staghorn corals. Such a patch would normally have been the highlight of any dive to this area but now, bleached white, it was merely more evidence that a catastrophe was under way. Dismayed, I swam back to the boat.

    On board was an eclectic collection of reef stakeholders including Imogen Zethoven, the director of the Great Barrier Reef campaign for the Australian Marine Conservation Society, who had also made the dive.

    “I was shocked,” she said. “I had expected some patches of bleaching surrounded by mainly healthy, colourful corals. I saw the opposite.

    “For decades, scientists and conservationists have been warning that climate change is an existential threat to the Great Barrier Reef and all the world’s corals. We know what needs to be done: a rapid transition to 100% renewable energy; an end to fossil fuel subsidies; the phasing out of coal-fired power stations; and keeping coal in the ground.”

    While the mass bleaching is caused directly by an El Niño, which pushes warm water to the east Australian coastline, many scientists believe climate change is making the El Niño worse and more frequent, and this is coupled with a general rise in sea temperatures caused by global warming.

    Also on board the dive boat was the chief executive of the Queensland Tourism Industry Council, Daniel Gschwind. The reaction of his organisation to the current bleaching requires a balancing act – on one hand, highlighting the need to protect the enormous value of the reef to the Australian economy, worth a conservative AU$6bn (about £3.25bn) a year, while on the other, making sure that tourists are not scared off by alarming news. “The Great Barrier Reef is Australia’s most important tourism asset,” he said.

    We dived at a second site at Agincourt Reef that day, at Castle Rock. Again, the underwater seascape was devastated by bleaching, and the scale of the devastation was beginning to sink in.

    Scientists report that the same scenes are being replicated along a 1,000km section of the reef, more than a third of its total expanse. Of 500 reefs between Cairns and Papua New Guinea surveyed during this current episode, 95% have experienced significant coral bleaching – only four reefs showed no impact.

    Prof David Booth, head of the Australian Coral Reef Society, the world’s oldest coral reef society, and representing some of the nation’s most respected marine biologists, said he had never seen scientists so worried.

    “The visual is shocking but so is the disconnect between the severity of the bleaching and the decisions by governments to approve coalmines and coal infrastructure,” he said. “Australia is like a drug dealer for climate change – selling all this coal, but all the while knowing the harm we are doing.”

    This particular bleaching event will end once the waters begin to cool. What scientists don’t know yet is how many of the corals will die, quickly being covered in a brown algae that tourists will not want to pay to see.

    But there is still room for optimism. These areas can and will recover as long as the scale and frequency of bleaching does not increase. And some other areas that have been devastated in the past decade by destructive threats – such as cyclones and crown-of-thorns starfish – are now recovering well. The reef is always a mosaic of damaged, recovering and stable areas that are constantly changing with environmental conditions.

    Coral has evolved to deal with attacks from nature. The question is: can it survive all the cumulative assaults from humans?

    James Woodford is the author of The Great Barrier Reef (Pan Macmillan). His trip was funded as part of a partnership between the Australian Marine Conservation Society and Oris

  27. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Atlas (23rd May 2016), BlueHeron (23rd May 2016), Bob (23rd May 2016), Ewan (4th July 2016), Foxie Loxie (23rd May 2016), Hervé (3rd July 2016), Jay Freeman (23rd May 2016), Jean-Marie (23rd May 2016), justntime2learn (23rd May 2016), KiwiElf (23rd May 2016), penn (24th May 2016), PurpleLama (23rd May 2016), Sierra (25th May 2016), Spirithorse (23rd May 2016), transiten (23rd May 2016), william r sanford72 (2nd July 2016)

  28. Link to Post #95
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,425
    Thanks
    211,625
    Thanked 459,752 times in 32,946 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    .
    This breaks my heart, but I have to post it.
    From http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/30/wo...ans/index.html

    The plastic plague: Can our oceans be saved from environmental ruin?











    The Great Pacific Garbage Patch has become the stuff of legend. This hotspot of marine waste, created by the spiral currents of the North Pacific Gyre, has been described as a floating trash island the size of Russia.

    But when filmmaker Jo Ruxton visited the location, she found clear blue water, and a deep-rooted problem.


    Location and currents of the North Pacific Gyre.


    "If you were diving, it looked like you had just jumped out of a plane," says Ruxton. "But our nets were coming up completely choked with plastic pieces."

    The pieces were small enough to mingle with plankton, the tiny organisms at the base of the food web that support many fish and whale species. Researchers have found 750,000 microplastic pieces per square kilometer in the Garbage Patch, and the marine life is riddled with them.

    "This was much more insidious than a huge mountain of trash which could be physically removed," says Ruxton. "You can't remove all the tiny pieces."

    Rising tide

    Ruxton visited the site while producing the film "A Plastic Ocean," in association with NGO Plastic Oceans, which documents the impact of half a century of rampant plastic pollution.

    Around eight million tons of plastic enter the marine environment each year, and the figure is set to rise. The Ellen Macarthur Foundation estimates that 311 million tons of plastic were produced in 2014, which will double within 20 years, and projects that there will be more plastic than fish in the oceans by 2050.



    Plastic is a remarkably durable material, with a potential lifespan of centuries. It does not biodegrade, but photodegrades under sunlight, breaking down into smaller and smaller pieces, which attract toxins and heavy metals as they travel on the tides. Plastic is pulled together in the powerful, circling currents of gyres, but it is also found in Arctic ice, washing up on remote islands, and infesting tourist destinations.

    Ruxton's crew visited dozens of locations without escaping the plastic plague. They found it covering the Mediterranean Sea bed, the shorelines of Bermuda, and Lord Howe Island in the Tasman Sea, a World Heritage site that has been severely affected.

    "We kept coming across dead chicks," Ruxton recalls of Howe Island. "We opened 10 of their stomachs which were so full of plastic they were swollen ... These birds were dying of starvation with their stomachs bulging full."

    But the most disturbing find was on the South Pacific island of Tuvalu.

    Health impact

    Tuvalu was once a pristine beauty spot. But the island lacks the infrastructure to dispose of the plastic it imports, which has become a serious hazard for the local population.

    "People were just throwing plastic outside," says Ruxton. "They were drowning in the stuff, and trying to burn it. There was a constant pall of black smoke, and people were always exposed to the gases that come out when you burn plastic, including two very scary ones that have been linked to cancer, dioxins and furans."

    From a group of 30 islanders featured in the film, five had cancer and two have died in the last 18 months, Ruxton says. She is raising funds to research the health impact of burning plastic.



    The team is also studying the effects of ingesting seaborne plastic through a partnership with toxicology specialists at London's Brunel University. Studies have shown a quarter of food fish sold at markets in California and Indonesia contain plastic, and although this has not yet resulted in public health warnings, tests have shown ingestion can cause tumors in lab animals.

    Californian oceanographer Captain Charles J. Moore, who first discovered the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and studies the impact of seaborne plastic, feels the "jury is still out" on the effects of ingestion on human health. But he believes our exposure is rapidly increasing, particularly through the spread of microplastics.

    "Plastic is in the air we breathe, it's become part of the soil and the animal kingdom," says Moore. "We're becoming plastic people."

    Counting the cost

    Moore believes we do not fully comprehend the damage caused by plastic pollution, largely as the gyres where it collects have been ignored.

    "The gyres are 40% of the world ocean -- one third of the planet," says Moore. "But these areas are not part of any exclusive economic zone, they are not used for the shipment of goods, they are not harvested for marine resources, and their welfare is no one's concern ... I'm convinced we haven't scraped the surface of the damage being done."

    From his own research, the volume of plastic has tripled in the gyres since the turn of the century, and plastic is disproportionately consumed by fish at the bottom of food chains, leading to rapid and deadly proliferation.

    "It is impossible to quantify death in the ocean as weak and dying creatures are so rapidly consumed," says Moore. He believes U.N. estimates that plastic kills around one million sea creatures a year far understate the impact.

    The U.N.'s Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Protection (GESAMP) has conducted several recent studies of plastic pollution and found far-reaching effects.

    "If we don't do anything, we will see certain species disappear," says GESAMP Chairman Peter Kershaw, citing the toll of entanglement and ingestion on endangered seals and whales. "In wider ecosystems, (plastic) certainly has an impact on sensitive habitats, including coral reefs."

    Kershaw also highlights the economic impact. Plastic causes $13 billion of damage to the marine environment each year according the UN, which affects the fishing, shipping and tourism industries.

    Getting a grip

    The issue of plastic pollution has gained traction over the past decade, which has seen research increase, and the launch of major initiatives such as the Global Partnership on Marine Litter, bringing together policymakers, conservationists and business interests to pursue solutions.

    Kershaw believes the key is to end the culture of disposable plastic, and implement closed loop systems for the material to be reused, which would reduce the demand for new production. Around 80% of plastic waste in the oceans originates on land, and recycling rates are poor, with just 9% of plastic in the U.S. recycled, according to the EPA.

    "We're suffering from a linear approach," he says. "We need to design waste out of the system."

    Kershaw adds that incentive schemes have proved effective. Charging consumers for plastic bags has reduced their use, and introducing refundable deposits for plastic bottles has created a market for collectors in Ecuador. Kershaw sees a role for entrepreneurs to redesign popular goods, such as an initiative to make tiles from discarded fishing nets in the Philippines.

    Emerging technologies are contributing to the struggle. Captain Moore uses separation machines to improve recycling and spare plastic pickers from dangerous work. Dutch entrepreneur Boyan Slat is testing a prototype of his Ocean Cleanup machine that he believes could clear 99% of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch within 30 years, although many conservationists are skeptical.

    "We are more focused on stopping pollution getting into the oceans," says Nancy Wallace, director of the marine debris program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which leads beach cleaning and public education campaigns. "Ocean cleanups are like mopping the floor with the faucet still running."

    The plastics industry also has a critical role, and leaders recognize the imperative to reform.

    "Our number one priority is tackling marine litter," says Karl H. Foerster, head of industry association Plastics Europe. "We fully support the circular economy concept."

    Foerster cites 260 initiatives the group has launched, from removing microplastics to improving wastewater treatment in developing countries, and developing biodegradable plastic.

    Tipping point

    Jo Ruxton wants to see greater responsibilities placed on plastic producers, such as in Germany where strict recycling quotas forced companies to use less plastic. Similar quotas will soon be introduced across the European Union.

    But the filmmaker is encouraged by the increased focus on the issue in recent years, and is confident that greater public awareness can have a significant impact.

    "If people realize how easy it is to make changes, and if they understand the consequences of not doing so, they want to change," she says.

    Ruxton stresses that time is short. If the culture does not change imminently, more communities will face a grim fate.

    "We're at a tipping point," she says. "I see Tuvalu as a snapshot of the future for all of us if we don't get this addiction under control."


  29. The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    animovado (2nd July 2016), Atlas (2nd July 2016), BMJ (2nd July 2016), Bob (2nd July 2016), ByTheNorthernSea (2nd July 2016), drneglector (2nd July 2016), Ewan (4th July 2016), Foxie Loxie (2nd July 2016), greybeard (2nd July 2016), Heart-2-Heart (2nd July 2016), Hervé (3rd July 2016), hohoemi (2nd July 2016), Jean-Luc (3rd July 2016), Limor Wolf (2nd July 2016), onawah (2nd July 2016), shaberon (2nd July 2016), Shannon (2nd July 2016), Sophocles (2nd July 2016), Spirithorse (2nd July 2016), william r sanford72 (2nd July 2016)

  30. Link to Post #96
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    4,424
    Thanks
    17,497
    Thanked 22,185 times in 4,074 posts

    Default Re: "We think something happened in the ocean."

    Horrendous.

    The only type of bio-engineering that I favor, is the production of enzymes that eat petroleum, and I think a newer kind can eat hard plastics as well. I don't know if enzyme tanks can scale to the level of trash flow. Plastic production will probably never slow down until there is a cheap alternative. I remember when glass bottles were widely used...and there was broken glass everywhere.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 5

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts