I have reviewed enough of this topic to know the difference between bad science and common sense.Posted by Kimberley (here)
[....snip]
Observer, I need to jump in and support Target...Observer did you watch the whole Galen Winsor lecture? Did you listen to the other 2 Galen pieces that are posted in the Galen thread? One is another video and one is an audio where Galen is talking about what happened at Chernobyl in 1986 after the event.
Did you read the study Taget is referring to about the Taiwan apartment buildings ? Did you go through all 18 pages of a whole lot more supporting content that is posted in the 18 pages?
I would say that anyone that has gone through all of the information gathered in that thread would at the very least certainly have some questions raised in regard to what is the real truth in regard to nuclear power.
All is well!
In another thread I have debated Mr. TargeT regarding the obscene proliferation of Depleted Uranium, a generally accepted crime against humanity. Mr. TargeT sees no consequence to littering the battlefields of the Middle East with dust that will adversely effect generations to come.
So, now we come to the subject of Thorium Reactors in every basement of our communities. I reiterate the question of, "what do we do with the waste"?
This question of radioactive waste has been at the core of nuclear proliferation since it was first proposed to use the atom for "peaceful purposes".
Within the home heating industry, the heat exchanger in the most expensive heat plants are guaranteed for no more than ten years. What happens to your private Thorium Reactor when the guarantee expires - let's be generous and say - in fifty years? Who are we going to call to replace the failed control valve? The local Plumber?
Where within our local communities do we pile-up all these worn-out and rotted Thorium Reactors? Do we trust our local scrap yards to properly dispose of them?
What happens to all these basement reactors when we have a Katrina-Sized weather event? Or, some other catastrophic natural event? Do we each become individually responaible for the proper disposal of these devices? Would you trust the crack addict down the street to be responsible for this?
What happens when this technology is applied to the transportation industry? Do we have junk yards of vehicles leaking Thorium for future generations to deal with?
Generating power from any radioactive material is a REALLY BAD IDEA. It makes no common sense.
The engineering concept of Fail-Safe has been thrown into the trash. The global elite want to reduce the population, and this is just one more road to that end.
What ever happened to:
- Wind Power?
- Solar Power?
- Developing more hydroelectric sources?
- Bio Fuels?
- Harvesting hydrogen from water?
Any one of these sources would solve the energy needs of humanity. Standing in the way of their development are the Global Elite with their strangle-hold on the petroleum industry.
I recall my old bumper sticker, "split wood - not atoms".
In another thread, witchy1 posted an article by Jim Stone that clearly defines the driving force behind the proliferation of nuclear waste - population reduction. That conclusion is all that can be interpreted when reviewing the evidence presented in Mr. Stone's report.
It is my greatest suspicion that these same Global Elite are behind this banter around the Galon Winsor phenomenon.
You are nothing more than a "useless feeder" to them.