Posted by araucaria
(here)
Dear friends,
Charles only mentioned that nuclear war had been off the table since ‘the early eighties’, without explaining why. If my hunch is correct, there is an extremely empowering story behind this for us today.
His comment seems to validate the Audio letters of whistleblower Dr Peter David Beter covering an 8-year period from 1974-8 (
http://peterdavidbeter.com particularly letters 78 & 79). The whole series (over 1600 pages of transcripts) makes a fascinating read - totally incredible, except that every now and again he makes an accurate prediction. It’s like War and Peace (or rather Hot War pretending to be Cold War), and it culminates in the prediction that at 3 pm on Friday 17 September 1982…nothing would happen excepting the not unconnected massacres at the Sabra and Chatila camps in Beirut that same day, but including the nuclear war scheduled for that hour and only aborted at 10 o’clock that morning. This was a false flag operation in that an all-out American first strike was designed to look like an automatic response to Russian aggression.
Let me outline the salient points from this material for people who have been reading too many forum threads (smiley smile). Maybe someone else can take up from where he leaves off (worth a try).
The story is part of a 1000-year war between Russia and the Khazar ‘Jews’. In 1917, the ‘spiritual Communists’ as they called themselves, made the mistake of forming an alliance with the atheist Bolsheviks (the Rothschild faction), and the Communist revolution soon turned sour. (Cautionary tale: many Christian Russians had sat back expectantly, doing as they had been told by their clergy, who were infiltrated by the Bolsheviks, and later these people were persecuted).
It took 60 years to rid the USSR of the Bolsheviks, with the tipping point in 1953 after Stalin’s death. This was achieved through eliminating them one at a time, and replacing them with doubles. The last of the Bolsheviks were simply thrown out and mostly welcomed by their Rockefeller partners in crime in the US (a ‘communist’ equivalent to the more familiar Nazi Project Paperclip). This was another mistake – short of a mass extinction, the problem would not go away. In America the Bolsheviks soon proved too hot to handle and at some stage later in the game, the Rockefellers switched sides and made a major contribution to averting war when Nixon went to China.
My conclusion here is that without any change of heart ‘greedy wankers’ can turn out to be indispensable allies against a nest of ‘vipers’ whose involuntary motto is ‘divide and divide’. Egocentrics can never get on together for long, they all want to be in charge. The situation is further complicated by multiple infiltrations on all sides. Because after using doubles until cloning was developed, the next step was for the Russians to introduce ‘Organic Robotoids’, soon to be met by the American Bolsheviks’ ‘Synthetic Automatons’, causing political havoc every time someone was replaced by an enemy.
Nuclear war was to be the Bolsheviks’ revenge on the Russians. Although behind in terms of both technology and intelligence, they were set on going ahead anyway. The Russians were merely seeking to eradicate the ‘rabies’ of bolshevism (Beter’s analogy) – where America was like a rabid dog, but one at least partly responsible for its condition and liable to be put down. So ordinary Americans were just so much collateral damage for both sides. (Sounds like the analogy still holds today, only globally. Question: do we have a cure yet?)
Importantly, one last-minute factor that finally removed the finger from the button was the whistleblower’s own testimony, quoted on Washington radio that morning by a single journalist from the Washington Post – the PTB mistakenly thought the info had gone viral, worse still in those days, gone mainstream. Where did Dr Beter get all this power from? From his alternative community of listeners wanting to do something, and whom he had been advising to write to their congressman or bank manager asking what had happened to the gold stolen from Fort Knox in the 60s. They must have really gone to town on that letter-writing because that little show of force was enough to tip the scales: no nuclear war then or since. The Internet was still more than a decade away.
There is no ET element in this version of events, which is not to say it wasn’t there. The Russians’ plan was to put this planet in order before heading off for Venus and the stars. We also know from the likes of Tsiolkovsky that even back in the 1920s the Russian space program always had a major spiritual component. However much bigger the thing has doubtless become, Dr Peter’s testimony does seem to provide a blueprint for any Internet forum seeking to take effective action.
Re: What's wrong with John Kerry ???
):
Reply With Quote
's, locking you out for more of the same, debt slavery in the shabby drafty homes of neglect and tax cuts?
Bookmarks