Posted by woodshreder
(here)
I totally understand I too would not want to debate this with him either.I guess my thoughts are we have heard from so many whistleblowers who's claims have not come to be I just get the feeling this community will become complacent, not intersted in hearing anymore insider info and we'll be caught with our pants down so to speak.
I agree that that Mr Nortons testimony has some issues with being credible,I'm just off the opinion if I was a whistleblower I would want my information to seem slightly skewed and misleading just to protect my ass. Is this the case with this whistleblower,has the wolf cried one too many times. I'myself am not sure,I do however think that there will come a time when a whistleblower who seems totally off his rocker will actually be the one who is screaming from the mountaintops and no one will listen.
Peace always peace