Gang Stalking of Softkill Researchers -- Extinction Level Events in the Lab?

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Keywords: Autism, ASD, Gulf War Syndrome, Myelin, Auto-immunity, Anthrax, Adjuvant, Recombinant, Recombineering, Simian Virus 40, Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus, XMRV, Softkill, Soft kill, Lab Engineered Diseases, AIDS, ESTs, Expressed Sequence Tags, Gang Stalking, Chronic Fatigue, Government Cover-Up, Vaccine Adverse Reaction.

_________________________________________________________________________

Why Are Scientists Being Harassed and Killed Over Viral Research?
__________________________________________________________________________

There is a common thread between the soldiers who suffer Gulf War Syndrome and the children who suffer many forms of Autism Spectrum Disorder, and the media may cry foul when it is mentioned in public -- but the proof is undeniable.

If vaccines are safe, then why do people in America keep testing positive for viruses transmitted only via in-vitro lab contamination?

If vaccines are safe, then why do war veterans and two-year-olds have the same in-vitro vaccine contaminants in their bodies, when "control" populations lack the virus?

The following is a personal account of a family currently involved in research with Whittemore-Peterson Institute:

http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/03/a...-creation.html
A Theory of XMRV Creation
By Kent Heckenlively, Esq.


Dr. Deckoff-Jones begins by asking how those who claim XMRV (xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus) is a lab contaminant explain that the blood of chronic fatigue syndrome/ME patients contain antibodies to XMRV. Anti-bodies can only be produced in the body, thus any later contamination of the blood in a lab would not provoke an immune response. The Whittemore-Peterson Institute has also put out a statement on allegations of contamination. HERE

I've been interested in XMRV since my daughter and wife have both tested positive for the retrovirus and are part of an ongoing research program at the Whittemore-Peterson Institute. I have tested negative for the retrovirus. Children with autism share many common clinical symptoms with the chronic fatigue syndrome/ME population, including immune disregulation, increased oxidative stress, expression of proinflammatory cytokines, low natural killer cell functionality, and active microbial infections.

A poster presentation entitled "Detection of Infectious XMRV in Peripheral Blood of Children" was made at the 1st International Workshop on XMRV in September of 2010 at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. In a small sample it was found that 14 of 17 children (82%) of the children were positive for XMRV infection.

The abstract which attracted the attention of Dr. Deckoff-Jones, XMRV Probably Originated through Recombination between 2 Endogenous Murine Retroviruses during in vivo Passage of a Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft, HERE was presented at the recent 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Boston, MA from February 27-March 2. While the abstract raised many questions, including that of contamination, to Dr. Deckoff-Jones it raised the strong likelihood that, "human and mouse endogenous retroviruses recombined through subsequent passages in vivo (in mouse) to produce a fully replicative xenotropic exogenous retrovirus, that in fact may prove to be the most infectious human retrovirus yet."

Having read the above, are you surprised and shocked and angry to see that whoever got to this Wikipedia article tried to cover up the link between illness and these lab-created monsters?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenotro...tigue_syndrome

Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) is a laboratory-derived gammaretrovirus that arose from the recombination of two endogenous mouse retroviruses during the mid 1990s. The chimeric virus was first described in 2006 as an apparently novel retrovirus and potential human pathogen. Initial reports linked the virus to prostate cancer and later to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), leading to considerable interest in the scientific and patient communities, investigation of XMRV as a potential cause of multiple medical conditions, and public health concerns about the safety of the donated blood supply.

XMRV has now been established as a laboratory contaminant. False positive detection of XMRV may also occur because of contamination of clinical specimens and laboratory reagents with other mouse retroviruses or related nucleic acids. Most scientific publications claiming an association of XMRV with CFS or prostate cancer have been retracted, and allegations of research misconduct were leveled against at least one CFS investigator. There is no evidence that XMRV can infect humans, nor has it been demonstrated that XMRV is associated with or causes any human disease.

It's being covered up just like SV-40's link to autism was covered up.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20345322

J Neurovirol. 2010 Mar;16(2):141-9. doi: 10.3109/13550281003685839.

Association of autism with polyomavirus infection in postmortem brains.

Lintas C, Altieri L, Lombardi F, Sacco R, Persico AM.
Author information

Abstract

Autism is a highly heritable behavioral disorder. Yet, two decades of genetic investigation have unveiled extremely few cases that can be solely explained on the basis of de novo mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities. Vertical viral transmission represents a nongenetic mechanism of disease compatible with high parent-to-offspring transmission and with low rates of disease-specific genetic abnormalities. Vertically transmitted viruses should be found more frequently in the affected tissues of autistic individuals compared to controls. Our initial step was thus to assess by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequence analysis the presence of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1), herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV2), human herpes virus 6 (HHV6), BK virus (BKV), JC virus (JCV), and simian virus 40 (SV40) in genomic DNA extracted from postmortem temporocortical tissue (Brodmann areas 41/42) belonging to 15 autistic patients and 13 controls. BKV, JCV, and SV40 combined are significantly more frequent among autistic patients compared to controls (67% versus 23%, respectively; P < .05). The majority of positives yielded archetypal sequences, whereas six patients and two controls unveiled single-base pair changes in two or more sequenced clones. No association is present with the remaining viruses, which are found in relatively few individuals (N <or= 3). Also polyviral infections tend to occur more frequently in the brains of autistic patients compared to controls (40% versus 7.7%, respectively; P = .08). Follow-up studies exploring vertical viral transmission as a possible pathogenetic mechanism in autistic disorder should focus on, but not be limited to, the role of polyomaviruses.

When scientists got too close to a viral answer to the autism problem, there was a cyberattack on the biggest autism resource in America:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/mas...tism_research/

Freezer failure at brain bank hampers autism research

By Karen Weintraub
Globe Correspondent / June 11, 2012

A freezer malfunction at Harvard-affiliated McLean Hospital has severely damaged one-third of the world’s largest collection of autism brain samples, potentially setting back research on the disorder by years, scientists say.

An official at the renowned brain bank in Belmont discovered that the freezer had shut down in late May, without triggering two alarms. Inside, they found 150 thawed brains that had turned dark from decay; about a third of them were part of a collection of autism brains.“This was a priceless collection,’’ said Dr. Francine Benes, director of the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center, where the brains were housed.

“You can’t express its value in dollar amounts,’’ said Benes, who is leading one of two internal investigations into the freezer failure.The damage to these brains could slow autism research by a decade as the collection is restored, said Carlos Pardo, a neuropathologist and associate professor of neurology at Johns Hopkins University.The collection, owned by the advocacy and research organization Autism Speaks, “yields very, very important information that allows us to have a better understanding of what autism is, as well as the contribution of environmental and immune factors,’’ said Pardo, whose 2004 study of brains stored in the bank was the first to find that autism involves the immune system.

“The benefit has been great.’’With that understanding, more effective treatment or prevention becomes possible.The McLean freezer, one of 24 in the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center, was protected by two separate alarm systems, and staff checked an external thermostat twice a day to ensure that the tissue samples were maintained at about minus-80 degrees Celsius. But on May 31, center Assistant Director George Tejada opened so-called Freezer U and wasn’t greeted by the expected blast of cold air.

Though the alarms had not been triggered and the external thermostat read minus-79, the actual temperature was 7 degrees, roughly equivalent to a refrigerator. Based on the condition of the brains, Benes estimates the freezer had turned off three days earlier.Benes said the situation is so unusual - the perfect storm of alarm and thermostat failure and the concentration of samples - that she cannot rule out foul play. She said she has not spoken to law enforcement officials, pending the completion of the internal investigation.In the interim, she said, McLean will upgrade security in the freezer room, which is under lock and key and watched by a surveillance camera.

The freezer contained about 150 brain samples from people who had died with a neurological condition such as autism, Parkinson’s disease, or Alzheimer’s disease, or a psychiatric one like bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.

More than 50 of those brains made up one-third of Autism Speaks’ Autism Tissue Program, a repository of postmortem brain tissue from children and young adults with the condition. The next largest autism brain bank, at the University of Maryland, has about 60 autism brains, according to its website. - See more at:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/mas....o4j7Jlli.dpuf

There aren't too many peoplein America invested in vaccines who also have access to sophisticated cyberattack capability... kind of a short list of billionaires and their friends.

http://rense.com/general94/bill.htm


Bill Gates And The SV40 Cancer-Causing Virus
By David Jenkins
6-22-11

The new (GMO-DNA) vaccines contain SV40.

Wikipedia, in an article on DNA vaccination includes this reference to SV40: "The SV40 promoter was conventionally used until research showed that vectors driven by the Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) promoter had much higher expression rates.[2] ... An example of DNA vaccine plasmid is pVAC, it uses SV40 promoter.

The SV40 Cancer Foundation, however, goes into more detail. "SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin.

"In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck.

Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa 1961. "Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's.

Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital said: "The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination."

Hillerman, chief of vaccines at Merck not only validated Bernice Eddy's discovery but he admitted that all Merck's vaccines contain cancer viruses and other viruses and that their Hepatitis vaccine caused the AIDS epidemic in the US. Dr. Larry Palevsky, a NY board certified pediatrician, agrees as well that vaccines contain viruses and says that most of the viruses in vaccines can not be removed.

The new vaccines are GMO-DNA vaccines. The material that they wish to inject has been genetically engineered (thus GMO) using parts of viruses, cancers, animal poxes, and combined, and are then shot or inhaled or injected into the body, to be "taken up by the DNA" (thus DNA) . This material is meant to affect the body in the most fundamental way possible, by affecting the very coding of the body (the DNA) which controls functions for the existence of the person.

And doesn't SV40's potential uptake by the child or adult's DNA present a much graver danger than previously? Could this cancer virus now become part of the body's coding itself? SV40 was removed by federal law. So, is against federal law to introduce it into vaccines again? And is it not an extreme threat to anyone taking the new vaccines, to have it taken up by their DNA?

Bill Gates wants every newborn on earth registered for vaccination, with cell phones to alert parents as well as locate people.

The Redmond, Wash.-based company's cofounder and chairman envisioned collecting biometric information on babies via handsets and transmitting the data to a central health registry, which could be used to remind parents about vaccinations. GPS data from the phone could also help guide medical personnel to remote locations to administer vaccines. Gates imagined trialing the program in areas with low vaccination rates like Nigeria or northern India.

"If you could register every birth on a cell phone-get fingerprints, get a location-then you could systems to make sure the immunizations happen," said Gates. .... Gate's plan didn't address the privacy implications of a birth database, which could be more or less substantial depending on how the information was structured.

Bill Gates is heavily invested in the new vaccines, that is the GMO-DNA vaccines. His plan would establish a global tracking system of everyone on earth which includes biometric identity information. While it clearly violates fundamental privacy rights as a prelude to violating human rights (i.e. giving governments power to inject things into anyone on earth in the name of "health"), Mr. Gates has come up with a unique marketing device for his own products.

His plan arranges to track people down wherever they may be and force his products on them via government agencies.

One sees the downside in terms of health rather quickly. Wouldn't every newborn, via the new vaccines, be injected with this known cancer virus at birth (or with Rous Sarcoma Virus RSV- another cancer virus) and then be injected with it or other viruses many, many, many, many, many times more over the course of infancy, childhood, adolescence and adulthood?

Assuming that almost all parents want to protect their children from cancer, wouldn't Mr. Gates' seeking to vaccinate every newborn on the planet with his GMO-DNA vaccines with SV40, be reason for even more parents and grandparents to reject vaccines. They are are already doing so, not just because of the studied connection between vaccines and autism, bowel disease, and mitochondrial dysfunction but because of personal experience through knowing personally what has been happening to children of friends, relatives and co-workers after vaccination.

The article quoted above about Gates says "Unfortunately, phones can't fight the ignorance that leads some Americans to leave their children unvaccinated." Is the writer referring to Robin MacNeil's daughter who said in her father's PBS series on autism that it was after the MMR, DTap and Hib vaccines that her son became autistic? One would assume she might be leaving her children unvaccinated after that, not out of ignorance but out of direct, unmediated by media, information of what happened after vaccination.

The article concludes with these words: "The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has given billions of dollars to charitable causes, making the couple the most generous philanthropists in America." Philanthropy is defined as the desire to promote the welfare of others, expressed by the generous donation of money to good causes. But Mr. Gates is doing quite the reverse.

He would be using his money to ensure that viruses proven to cause cancer would be injected into every possible child on the planet and has devised a plan to try to make sure none can escape.

Mr. Gates would be hurting millions, perhaps billions, helping international health agencies funded in fact by himself, to seize their rights to control their own bodies and that of their children, while guaranteeing himself profits with no end in sight. Were people to become ill, he would make more money from selling yet more vaccines.

Look what happens to scientists who refuse to take "no" for an answer in America:

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2...ephalomyelitis

Chronic fatigue syndrome researchers face death threats from militants
Scientists are subjected to a campaign of abuse and violence

Robin McKie
The Observer, Saturday 20 August 2011

The full extent of the campaign of intimidation, attacks and death threats made against scientists by activists who claim researchers are suppressing the real cause of chronic fatigue syndrome is revealed today by the Observer. According to the police, the militants are now considered to be as dangerous and uncompromising as animal rights extremists.

One researcher told the Observer that a woman protester who had turned up at one of his lectures was found to be carrying a knife. Another scientist had to abandon a collaboration with American doctors after being told she risked being shot, while another was punched in the street. All said they had received death threats and vitriolic abuse.

In addition, activists – who attack scientists who suggest the syndrome has any kind of psychological association – have bombarded researchers with freedom of information requests, made rounds of complaints to university ethical committees about scientists' behaviour, and sent letters falsely alleging that individual scientists are in the pay of drug and insurance companies.

"I published a study which these extremists did not like and was subjected to a staggering volley of horrible abuse," said Professor Myra McClure, head of infectious diseases at Imperial College London. "One man wrote he was having pleasure imagining that he was watching me drown. He sent that every day for months."

Chronic fatigue syndrome – also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) – is common and debilitating. A recent BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal) feature suggested that as many as one in 250 people in the UK suffers from it. Patients are sometimes unable to move and become bedridden, occasionally having to be fed through a tube. For more than 20 years, scientists have struggled to find the cause, with some pointing to physiological reasons, in particular viral infections, while others have argued that psychological problems are involved.

It is the latter group that has become the subject of extremists' attacks. The antagonists hate any suggestion of a psychological component and insist it is due to external causes, in particular viruses. In the case of McClure, her "crime" was to publish a paper indicating that early studies linking the syndrome to the virus XMRV were wrong and the result of laboratory contamination. So furious was the reaction that she had to withdraw from a US collaboration because she was warned she might be shot.

A similar hate campaign was triggered by a study published in the Lancet earlier this year. It suggested that a psychological technique known as cognitive behavioural therapy could help some sufferers. This produced furious attacks on the scientists involved, including Michael Sharpe, professor of psychological medicine at Oxford University. He had already been stalked by one woman who was subsequently found to be carrying a knife at one of his lectures.

"The tragedy is that this tiny group of activists are driving young scientists from working in the field," said Sharpe. "In the end, these campaigns are only going to harm patients."

This point was backed by Fiona Fox, director of the Science Media Centre. "Using threats and intimidation to prevent scientists pursuing specific avenues of research or speaking out is damaging not just science. It harms society," she said.

None of the scientists contacted by the Observer believed chronic fatigue syndrome was purely psychological. All thought external causes were involved. "There is an element that is heritable," said Dr Esther Crawley, a consultant paediatrician at Bristol University. "We also know that in children it is often triggered by a virus infection, while in adults it is associated with social deprivation. Stress and adversity is involved. To call this yuppie flu – as people have done – is a complete misnomer."

Crawley has spent years trying to unravel the causes, but her refusal to accept that the condition is a result only of organic external factors has resulted in her being deluged with hate mail from extremists. "You evil bastards … time is running out for you so you have [sic] better start denouncing your flawed inhumane therapy and pray to God for forgiveness," said one.

"To those who are responsible for preventing us sick ME sufferers from getting the help we need ... you will all pay," stated another. "It is depressing to receive emails like that, but I make sure that it does not get me down," said Crawley. "I do check packages that are sent to my office, however."

Many of the extremists' claims are bizarre, said Professor Simon Wessely, of the Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London. "They say I am in league with pharmaceutical companies in order to suppress data that shows a link between viruses and the syndrome. But why on earth would drug companies do that? If they could link the condition to a virus they would be well on the way to developing lucrative treatments and vaccines. It is crazy."

Wessely has installed speed dial phones and panic buttons at the police's request and has his mail X-rayed. He gave up his research on chronic fatigue syndrome several years ago, though he still treats patients. "I have moved my research interests to studies of Gulf war syndrome and other conditions linked to war zones," he said. "That has taken me to Iraq and Afghanistan where quite frankly I feel a lot safer – and I don't mean that as a joke."

How do these needle pushers stay in business when so many millions of people are finding out about the side effects?

http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-dis...imonySV40.aspx

The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused An Increase in Cancer?

Oral Presentation
Barbara Loe Fisher
Co-founder & President
National Vaccine Information Center
September 10, 2003

Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness
U.S. House Government Reform Committee
U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
“The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer?”

My name is Barbara Loe Fisher and I am the mother of a DPT-vaccine injured son and the co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center. I have spent the last 21 years working with other parents to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education and defending the right to exercise informed consent to vaccination. (Coulter HL, Fisher BL. 1985. DPT: A Shot in the Dark. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.; Attachment 1 – Allen A. May 6, 2001. A Shot in the Dark. New York Times Magazine; Konrad W. and Ginsburg EH. June-July 2000. Who’s Calling the Shots? Offspring Magazine.)

The shocking story you are about to hear involves a pharmaceutical company which used monkeys to make polio vaccine, government health agencies responsible for making sure the vaccine was not contaminated with monkey viruses, and individuals who are now are dying from cancerous tumors that contain a monkey virus which appears to have contaminated that polio vaccine. At the heart of this tragic story is a violation of the public trust and the informed consent ethic. It is a story about what happens when the legal and moral duty for industry and government to insure that a vaccine will not harm individuals is sacrificed to insure acceptance and mass use of a vaccine by the entire population. It shows what can happen when Congress, which has oversight authority over federal health agencies, blindly trusts and fails to verify.

I began speaking and writing about monkey virus contamination of polio vaccines ten years ago when questions were raised in the medical literature about whether the use of monkeys infected with monkey viruses to produce oral polio vaccines was responsible for HIV and the AIDS epidemic. (Attachment 2: Kyle, W.S. 1992. Simian retroviruses, polio vaccine, and origin of AIDS. The Lancet 339: 600-601.) Between 1994 and 1997 I submitted several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the government regarding testing of certain lots of oral polio vaccine for monkey virus contamination (Attachment 3 – Correspondence between BL Fisher and FDA) During the course of my research I discovered that it was well known that the first polio vaccine produced in the 1950’s – the inactivated polio vaccine created by Jonas Salk – was made using rhesus monkeys that were infected with a monkey virus called simian virus 40 or SV40.

It was in 1960 that an NIH scientist named Bernice Eddy discovered that rhesus monkey kidney cells used to make the Salk polio vaccine and experimental oral polio vaccines could cause cancer when injected into lab animals. Later that year the cancer-causing virus in the rhesus monkey kidney cells was identified as SV40 or simian virus 40, the 40th monkey virus to be discovered. (Shorter, e. 1987. The Health Century) Sadly, the American people were not told the truth about this in 1960. The SV40 contaminated stocks of Salk polio vaccine were never withdrawn from the market but continued to be given to American children until early 1963 with full knowledge of federal health agencies. Between 1955 and early 1963, nearly 100 million American children had been given polio vaccine contaminated with the monkey virus, SV40. (Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences . 2002. Immunization Safety Review: SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press)

Today, U.S. federal health agencies admit the following two facts: 1. Salk polio vaccine released for public use between 1955 and 1963 was contaminated with SV40; and2. SV40 has been proven to cause cancer in animals. In fact, at a conference on SV-40 and human cancers held by the National Institutes of Health in 1997, which I attended, there was no disagreement among both government and non-government scientists about these two facts. The only disagreement was whether SV40 was actually being identified in the cancerous tumors of children and adults alive today and, if it was, whether the monkey virus was in fact responsible for their cancer. Non-government scientists working in independent labs around the world said, “Yes.” But the scientists connected with the U.S. government said “No.” (Transcript of FDA, CDC, NIH, NIP, NVPO January 27-28, 1997 Workshop on Simian Virus 40: A Possible Human Polyomavirus).

Today, there are scientists associated with the US government who continue to deny that SV40 causes human cancer or that SV40 associated cancers have had any effect on cancer rates since the early 1960’s. However, highly credentialed non-government scientists in multiple labs around the world continue to identify SV40 in human brain and lung cancers of children and adults and are finding that SV40 is also associated with bone cancers and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas. The majority of these independent scientists have concluded that, yes, SV40 does cause human cancers. (Attachment 4 – Gazdar AE, Butel JS, Carbone M. 2002. SV40 and human tumours: myth, association or causality? Nature 2: 957-964) And in a report published in 2001, the Institute of Medicine Immunization Safety Review Committee stated that “in light of the biological evidence supporting the theory that SV40 contamination of polio vaccines could contribute to human cancers, the Committee recommends continued public health attention in the form of policy analysis, communication and targeted biological research.”

Up until this hearing today, the world scientific community has assumed that the only polio vaccine that was contaminated with SV40 and released for use by millions of Americans was Jonas Salk’s killed polio vaccine, which stopped being used in 1963 because it was replaced by Albert Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine. Why? Because the oral polio vaccine manufacturer and federal health agencies have told everyone that while the Salk vaccine was made using the SV40 infected rhesus monkey kidney tissues, after 1963 the oral polio vaccine was made using African Green monkeys, which are rarely infected with SV40. The vaccine manufacturer and government officials have insisted that the switch from rhesus monkey to African Green as well as testing protocols to detect SV40 prevented SV40 from contaminating oral polio vaccine after 1963. (Attachment 5: Statement of Bonnie Brock, Lederle, at Jan. 27-28, 1997 Workshop on SV40, transcript pages 300-307).

However, you will be presented with evidence today that suggests (Attachment 6: Kops SP. 2000. Oral polio vaccine and human cancer: a reassessment of SV40 as a contaminant based upon legal documents. Anticancer Research 20: 4745-4749. and Oral Testimony, Stanley Kops, Esq. Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, US Government Reform Committee, September 10, 2003): 1. the original seed stocks of oral polio vaccine were made using the rhesus monkey and were contaminated with SV40;2. the major oral polio vaccine manufacturer did not adequately test their master seed stocks which reportedly contained SV40 but used them to produce vaccine released for use by American children from the 1960’s through the 1990’s;3. Federal regulatory agencies either did not know or knew and did not do anything about evidence that SV40 contaminated oral polio vaccine was released for use by the public from the 1960’s through the 1990’s; If SV40 contaminated rhesus monkeys were used to produce original oral polio vaccine seed stocks, and if these seed stocks were used to produce oral polio vaccine that was swallowed by American children through the 1990’s, and if SV40 does cause human brain, lung and bone cancers, then this could explain why children today, who were not born before 1963 and never got the SV40 contaminated Salk vaccines, are now sick and dying from cancerous tumors containing DNA from a monkey virus that was in those vaccines.

Pediatric brain cancer, once rare, rose during the past few decades according to the National Cancer Institute. But we don’t know how many of these children had or have SV40 in their brain tumors because nobody checks. How many of these children are sick and dying because the manufacturer of oral polio vaccine did not follow the rules and government health agencies didn’t enforce the rules? Since 1999, the US has discontinued use of the live oral polio vaccine and American children are now getting a killed polio vaccine that is reportedly SV40 free.

So why is it important today to find out whether or not the oral vaccine used to eradicate polio was in fact contaminated with a cancer causing monkey virus, and that the vaccine manufacturer knew it, and that government health agencies looked the other way? It is important because if it is true, then a precedent has been set. And that precedent may well be affecting decisions being made by government health agencies today about what kinds of animal tissue cultures vaccine manufacturers will be allowed to use to make new vaccines and what kinds of tests will be required to insure that the vaccines do not contain animal viruses or other contaminants.

Drugs and vaccines are very different. Drugs are used to cure sick people while vaccines are required by law in this country to be given to healthy people, primarily children. The standards for proof of safety and efficacy of vaccines should be higher than for any other pharmaceutical product we use.

I have just ended a four year term as the consumer voting member of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. My service on that committee gave me a new appreciation for the dedicated work of a number of fine scientists employed by the FDA, who take their regulatory duties very seriously and are working hard to regulate the vaccine industry with very limited resources and limited support within and outside of government. However, there are legitimate concerns which I and others have voiced in the past and continue to have about whether government standards for requiring vaccine manufacturers to prove the safety and efficacy of vaccines are high enough and whether the tests used by the manufacturers and the government to insure the safety of vaccines are good enough. (Attachment 7: National investigative news reports, including Wechsler P. November 11, 1996. A Shot in the Dark. New York Magazine.; Rock, A. December 1996: The Lethal Dangers of the Billion Dollar Vaccine Business. Money Magazine.; Bookchin D, Schumacher J. June 1997. The Lonely Crusade of Walter Kyle. Boston Magazine; Bookchin D., Schumacher J. February 2000: The Virus and the Vaccine. Atlantic Monthly Magazine.)

I urge this Committee and other congressional committees to carefully review the transcripts of meetings of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, specifically those which were held in 1998; 2000; 2001 and dealt with adventitious agent contamination of vaccines. Vaccine manufacturers are asking the FDA for permission to use cells from human and animal cancer tumors – that is cancer cells – to make HIV and other viral vaccines in the future that would be used on a mass basis by the American population. There has been a federal ban on use of cancer cells to produce vaccines since 1954 but active consideration is being given now to lift that ban despite the acknowledged risks of contamination with adventitious agents, including residual DNA and RNA. .(Attachment 8: Excerpt from November 19, 1998 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting, transcript pages 29-52).

There is frank admission that the limitations of technology and lack of scientific knowledge means there can be no guarantee the vaccines will not be contaminated with substances that could prove harmful to humans one day. Nevertheless, there are plans to set allowable threshholds for adventitious agent contamination of vaccines being made out of cancer cells that would contain residual DNA and RNA. (Attachment 9: Excerpts from May 12, 2000 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript and Attachment 10: Excerpts from May 16, 2001 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript) I do not think Congress or the public understands any of this. There should be a much wider discussion in the larger scientific community outside of federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as in Congress and by the public at large before decisions are made to proceed with producing vaccines that use cancer cells and have legally allowable threshholds of adventitious agent contamination.

Past is often prologue. So much can be learned from understanding the mistakes of the past so that the same mistakes are not made in the future. Outstanding questions about the links between vaccines, government vaccine policies and the epidemic of chronic disease in our children, including autism, learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma, diabetes and, as we have discussed today, cancer are not going away. Questions about the links between vaccines that US military soldiers are required to take, including anthrax and smallpox vaccines, and the subsequent death or permanent health problems being suffered by those previously healthy, young recruits are not going away. They will never go away when the main defense of industry and government health officials is that when anything bad happens after vaccination it is just a coincidence. I can tell you, the American public, especially parents, are not buying it. And they shouldn’t buy it, especially when the kind of evidence that you will hear today suggests official government and industry denials are simply a way of avoiding taking responsibility for failing to do everything they can to minimize the risks of vaccines.

We owe it to our children and grandchildren to do everything we can to find out the truth about vaccine risks and make the mass vaccination system as safe as it can be. I believe that can only be done if Congress exercises more oversight authority over federal health agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation, policymaking, promotion and monitoring of vaccine side effects. Conflict of interest legislation is urgently needed to separate government health agencies from financial and other ties with the vaccine industry so that government health officials can be free to do the job they are supposed to do: protect the health and well being of every American and not simply protect the vaccine supply. (Attachment 11: Investigative news report by UPI reporter Mark Benjamin. July 20, 2003. Chicago Sun Times, Washington Times)

Before I conclude, I would like to thank you, Chairman Burton, for all you have done during the past three years to investigate and bring to the attention of Congress and the American people the fact that our nation’s mass vaccination system must be reformed to make it safer. You have had the courage to stand up for those who suffer greatly when a vaccine’s risks turn out to be 100 percent for them or their child and you have done it against great opposition from powerful special interest groups with vested interests in protecting the status quo. Your tireless efforts on behalf of so many will not be in vain because the truth will shine bright and clear in the end no matter how long it takes.

What bothers me the most about all of this virus stuff is that people have known about the possibility that people have adverse reactions and even catch diseases like AIDS after being exposed to experimental recombinant vaccines, but we still can't seem to stop the practice of vaccinating the poor in order to eliminate them from the population:

http://rense.com/general45/cant.htm

The Man-Made Origin of AIDS:

Are Human and Viral Experiments Responsible

For Unleashing The HIV Holocaust??
By Alan Cantwell, Jr, MD

c. 2003 All Rights Reserved
11-21-3

Since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic there have been persistent rumors that the disease was man-made, and that HIV was deliberately "introduced" into the American gay and the African black populations as a germ warfare experiment. This so-called conspiracy theory was quickly squelched by virologists and molecular biolologists, who blamed primates in the African bush and human sexuality for the introduction and spread of HIV. In the fall of 1986 the Soviets shocked the world by claiming that HIV was secretly developed at Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army's biological warfare unit. Although the claim was dismissed as "infectious propaganda", Russian scientists had worked hand in hand with biological warfare scientists in the transfer of viruses and virus-infected tissue into various non-human primates (monkeys, apes, chimps) during the 1970s before AIDS appeared. With improved international relationships, the Russian accusation vanished.

Although evidence supporting the man-made theory has never been mentioned in the major U.S. media, the theory continues to be ridiculed. For example, in the San Francisco Chronicle,( "Quest for the Origin of AIDS", January 14, 2001), William Carlsen writes: "In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, theories attempting to explain the origin of the disease ranged from the comic to the bizarre: a deadly germ escaped from a secret CIA laboratory; God sent the plague down to punish homosexuals and drug addicts; it came from outer space, riding on the tail of a comet."

AIDS certainly did not come from the hand of God or outer space. However, there is ample evidence to suspect the hand of man in the outbreak of AIDS that first began in the late 1970s in New York City. Creating AIDS in animals before the epidemic Lost in the history of AIDS is evidence pointing to HIV as a virus whose origin traces back to animal cancer retrovirus experimentation in the "pre-AIDS" years of the 1960s and 70s. Evidence linking the introduction of HIV into gays and blacks via vaccine experiments and programs in the late 1970s has been totally ignored in favor of the politically correct theory claiming that HIV originated in chimpanzees in the African rain forest, and that HIV "jumped species" into the African population around 1930 or even earlier.

Although it is somewhat technical and difficult to understand, you see why it is important to keep up with viral research, and particularly, scientists who track vaccine adverse reactions.

The picture is a lot bigger than any single disease. We are talking about cancer, AIDS, autism, Gulf War Syndrome, and any number of lab-grown maladies that strike only after one encounters the needle.

You were never purer and healthier than before your DNA and mitochondria and immune system were compromised by foreign material via vaccination.

Please pray for the scientists who fight for our right to know.

[etm567]

Please excuse me if I have misunderstood. I do not understand all of the above. But I am a long-time sufferer of chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome, aka chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis, and on and on and on.

And I wonder if you actually read the article about CFS there. What so many sufferers of CFS are objecting to has been the movement, led by the US, to reduce myalgic encephalomyelitis, a disease that has been recognized in the UK and perhaps New Zealand and Australia (I'm not sure, sorry) for decades, to "chronic fatigue syndrome", caused by, mainly, some psychological weakness, and best treated by cognitive behavioral therapy. And, oh, yes, let us not forget, ditching the strong recommendation that people with this illness NOT overdo. Overdoing puts us in bed, period.

I won't go on. I could for pages and pages and pages. There is a book -- and it is a very, very thick book -- Osler's Web, which is just about the way this disease has been treated, and mistreated, by the scientific community under the direction of the important, money-giving, government agencies.

I can't help but wonder if perhaps you did not really read this article. People with CFS are very desperate, as am I. And no, it is not psychological. And CBT has been proven, yes, proven, by studies, not to be particularly helpful. And it has also been demonstrated, again, by studies, that this disease is not emotional or psychological. It has even been demonstrated that it is not related to depression.

Sorry I cannot just cite all the links. I have been so sick and out of it for so long that I cannot. Am not up to date. And Google Scholar hides these days. And I just don't understand it all anymore. I used to be quite intelligent, but no longer.

But it isn't depression. It isn't related to depression. In fact, people with CFIDS are less likely to have clinical depression than other folks. And exercise hurts us. Hurts us a lot. Very, very carefully limited exercise is okay. It is not the most effective treatment. And as I said above, CBT does not help significantly.

Something causes this disease. And whatever that something is, it seems to have the US government very worried, to the point the government has gone to great lengths to shut down avenues of research it does not approve of. This is far more common than that upset sufferers shut down avenues of research! That's pretty ridiculous on the face of it. The government has control of funds, not those of us who have this disease.

A researcher, Hokama, in Hawaii found a strong correlation between CFS and low-level exposure to radiation, combined with exposure to a neurotoxin found in algae and pond scum (if I have got it right). And apparently, there is an epidemic of CFS in the south Pacific, where so much atomic testing was carried out. And the US government turned itself inside out and upside down in its efforts to shut down Hokama's research. Why might that be? It certainly wasn't sick people who are upset at Hokama suggesting that it's all in their heads (which he did not do).

No. And yes, people are upset when it is suggested that this debilitating disease is caused by "stress" and some inherited weakness. They are upset by the determined refusal to even look at the mountains of research that have concrete physical findings of abnormalities dating back decades. But if researchers want funding from the government, then that is what they have to do -- ignore all those real findings, and concentrate on the psychological factor.

Enough from me. I am repeating myself, and I apologize.

And as I said before, I fear you did not really read this article. I think from the context of your article, you are talking about the same thing I am -- efforts by the PTB to shut down avenues of research they do not want to see explored.

Ellen

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Hmm, the article said that the scientists believe in an external factor, which rules out simple depression,
and in children the disease may have a viral vector;

did I miss something, etm567?

It wasn't just the two scientists you mentioned that were threatened, it was many more.
It is not an unforgiveable sin to be wrong, even in science; it just reduces one's paycheck in the end.
Not all of them push the psychosomatic viewpoint;
a positive outlook can sometimes help the immune system.

[AutumnW]

Tesla, In the case of threatened researchers being wrong--there is financial reward, not risk. I've been fighting g this f'g disease since my teens. I welcome all of those grim f'ers, like Crawley, who site 'social deprivation' as a cause, to accept a quickie blood transfusion from me. Make my day, Crawley and Merry Christmas!!

[AutumnW]

Wow--Sorry Tesla! Yesterday was not a good day

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

No worries.

I often feel ill myself, but probably don't notice it as much.

Had asthma as a young kid -- takes a lot out of ya!!

So, I know how you feel. Weird sleep patterns. Easily exhausted.
Restless, sometimes hungry sometimes nauseous, etc...



Immune issues

[toad]

Enjoyed the post, was unaware of some connections. But I have to ask myself to weigh the options. What if a polio vaccine was never implemented? I mean having polio affect the populous as it did back in those days was quite horrendous, granted that is in no way an excuse to allow for carcinogenic therapies to be released into the wild, naturally its a terrible injustice.

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Well, from what I understand, the paralysis caused by the recent dispensing of oral polio vaccine in India and Pakistan was worse than that caused by so-called "wild" polio.

Sanitation was a huge part of eradicating polio in the West. Vaccine manufacturers try to take credit for it.
People are starting to resent polio vaccines so much recently that they are killing the aid workers.

maybe the agencies should halt the vaccine program and focus on other needs, since the populace doesn't welcome vaccines??

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Was reading the local paper online yesterday (Union Bulletin) and realized, I live in an area horribly tainted by vaccine propaganda.
We have a very large population of migrant workers and farmhands here in Walla Walla.
I would imagine that the local health authority is concerned about this and maintains a very hard line regarding vaccination.

The thing that is sad about it is, Mexicans are not inherently dirty, and autism happens to them too (vaccine injury).
Society fears them because they are immigrants and tries to force them into vaccination to protect the local herd.

I have a feeling that much of the research regarding what's wrong with PTSD and Gulf War patients will correlate with vaccine injury in children and autistic brains in kids.
Chronic fatigue in adults might translate into different problems for kids.

For example, chronic fatigue adult has a kid, vertically transmits a dangerous virus to the child.
Kid ends up with brain problems or worse.

I think the doctors in the article mentioned by the other posters in this thread were targeted because they had the wrong answer, and someone important wanted the public to think they had the right answer. the conflict created an illusion of legitimacy.

I understand the frustration here guys.

[panpsych]

Posted by etm567 (here)
Please excuse me if I have misunderstood. I do not understand all of the above. But I am a long-time sufferer of chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome, aka chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis, and on and on and on.

And I wonder if you actually read the article about CFS there. What so many sufferers of CFS are objecting to has been the movement, led by the US, to reduce myalgic encephalomyelitis, a disease that has been recognized in the UK and perhaps New Zealand and Australia (I'm not sure, sorry) for decades, to "chronic fatigue syndrome", caused by, mainly, some psychological weakness, and best treated by cognitive behavioral therapy. And, oh, yes, let us not forget, ditching the strong recommendation that people with this illness NOT overdo. Overdoing puts us in bed, period.

I won't go on. I could for pages and pages and pages. There is a book -- and it is a very, very thick book -- Osler's Web, which is just about the way this disease has been treated, and mistreated, by the scientific community under the direction of the important, money-giving, government agencies.

I can't help but wonder if perhaps you did not really read this article. People with CFS are very desperate, as am I. And no, it is not psychological. And CBT has been proven, yes, proven, by studies, not to be particularly helpful. And it has also been demonstrated, again, by studies, that this disease is not emotional or psychological. It has even been demonstrated that it is not related to depression.

Sorry I cannot just cite all the links. I have been so sick and out of it for so long that I cannot. Am not up to date. And Google Scholar hides these days. And I just don't understand it all anymore. I used to be quite intelligent, but no longer.

But it isn't depression. It isn't related to depression. In fact, people with CFIDS are less likely to have clinical depression than other folks. And exercise hurts us. Hurts us a lot. Very, very carefully limited exercise is okay. It is not the most effective treatment. And as I said above, CBT does not help significantly.

Something causes this disease. And whatever that something is, it seems to have the US government very worried, to the point the government has gone to great lengths to shut down avenues of research it does not approve of. This is far more common than that upset sufferers shut down avenues of research! That's pretty ridiculous on the face of it. The government has control of funds, not those of us who have this disease.

A researcher, Hokama, in Hawaii found a strong correlation between CFS and low-level exposure to radiation, combined with exposure to a neurotoxin found in algae and pond scum (if I have got it right). And apparently, there is an epidemic of CFS in the south Pacific, where so much atomic testing was carried out. And the US government turned itself inside out and upside down in its efforts to shut down Hokama's research. Why might that be? It certainly wasn't sick people who are upset at Hokama suggesting that it's all in their heads (which he did not do).

No. And yes, people are upset when it is suggested that this debilitating disease is caused by "stress" and some inherited weakness. They are upset by the determined refusal to even look at the mountains of research that have concrete physical findings of abnormalities dating back decades. But if researchers want funding from the government, then that is what they have to do -- ignore all those real findings, and concentrate on the psychological factor.

Enough from me. I am repeating myself, and I apologize.

And as I said before, I fear you did not really read this article. I think from the context of your article, you are talking about the same thing I am -- efforts by the PTB to shut down avenues of research they do not want to see explored.

Ellen

Apologies for massively bumping this thread, but until now I've been unable to find anyone willing to talk about M.E this reasonably in the 'alternative community'. I too have suffered with M.E for years (I refuse to use the nomenclature CFS - here's my view on why - : http://marksgotproblems.wordpress.co...op-cfs-for-me/). First, I want to thank you for taking the time to place this caveat where it can be seen.

My research on this (10+ years) has led me to wholeheartedly agree with you on all you've said, except in one minor detail. As a UK citizen, I'm sorry to say that M.E has only been adopted "in namely only" over CFS. And by that I mean, the disparity between the WHO sub-typing classification and the government's policy on treating M.E essentially means that the same outmoded treatment plans are still in place here too (CBT and the suchlike). There are other strategies in place as secondary measures, but unfortunately treatment plans still fall under the same brackets as those for mental health conditions like depression or anxiety here, despite the now massive convergence of evidence demonstrating that this is conclusively a neuro-immunological disorder, involving the dysfunction of multiple bio and neurological systems. So it seems that we're still in the same kind of legislative muddle as the US regarding this issue.

M.

[sigma6]

Posted by toad (here)
Enjoyed the post, was unaware of some connections. But I have to ask myself to weigh the options. What if a polio vaccine was never implemented? I mean having polio affect the populous as it did back in those days was quite horrendous, granted that is in no way an excuse to allow for carcinogenic therapies to be released into the wild, naturally its a terrible injustice.

The Polio vaccine (which was nothing more then the introduction of cancer causing monkey viruses into the human population) was introduced after Polio was already declining and no longer affecting the population at large... it was an illusion of timing and the beginning of a huge money making opportunity for Rockefeller controlled Big Pharma, to milk what now stands at 10s of trillions of dollars, that's enough money to kill people for...

Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic - Dr. Tent
- It's Not Autoimmune, you have Viruses

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=YuDvRSvyz5Y

Dr Mary's Monkey

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GZ5-liXcXLI

Weaponized Cancer Viruses Exposed!
w Dr. Mary's Monkey Author Ed Haslam

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zmXRXrh8BHQ

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by panpsych (here)
Apologies for massively bumping this thread, but until now I've been unable to find anyone willing to talk about M.E this reasonably in the 'alternative community'. I too have suffered with M.E for years (I refuse to use the nomenclature CFS - here's my view on why - : http://marksgotproblems.wordpress.co...op-cfs-for-me/).

After a bit of reading, I figured out that "M.E." stands for the Latin phrase "Myalgic Encephalomyelitis", which translates roughly to ‘brain and spinal inflammation with muscular pain’.

"CFS", the more common but alas inaccurate and pejorative acronym for the condition stands "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome".

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by panpsych (here)
Apologies for massively bumping this thread, but until now I've been unable to find anyone willing to talk about M.E this reasonably in the 'alternative community'. I too have suffered with M.E for years (I refuse to use the nomenclature CFS - here's my view on why - : http://marksgotproblems.wordpress.co...op-cfs-for-me/).

After a bit of reading, I figured out that "M.E." stands for the Latin phrase "Myalgic Encephalomyelitis", which translates roughly to ‘brain and spinal inflammation with muscular pain’.

"CFS", the more common but alas inaccurate and pejorative acronym for the condition stands "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome".

The discovery of King Richard III's resting place in Great Britain (article on Yahoo! a couple minutes ago!), and the DNA testing the researchers accomplished utilizing maternal mitochondrial DNA, should shed some light on HOW IMPORTANT it is to the human body and our health, not to damage the DNA or interfere with the molecular pathways essential to development.

THe strange thing about ASD and other "spectrum disorders" is that we see changes on the micro level and also on a level consistent with more serious diseases, including Multiple Sclerosis.

MS and ME could be closely related, the difference being motility.

It's no accident that "Tuberous Sclerosis" and autism go hand in hand -- there are all sorts of nasty Myelin-stripping factors out there these days.



So it would not surprise me to see a link between some of the more devastating diseases of previous decades (MS) and today's less obvious but no less harmful diseases (CFS, ASD)


we saw the same thing with Herpes and AIDS.
people got pissed off so the "softkill" diseases went up as the others disappeared.

diabetes, strokes, parkinson's ME/CFS, ASD,etc. not to mention the Gulf War Vets.

ty for bump