I am sorry Mark, I can recognize the possibility that you are as authoritative (in reference to competence, etc.) as you claim, but your words belie that probability.Posted by markpierre (here)
Well said. But I don't spend any time with the unwilling. They don't show up.
Am I to understand that anyone who doesn't essentially show up having done the work for you (all but 8 minutes that is) isn't adequately willing? Some of the most willing and most in need require far more than a sit down to resolve their issues. In many cases, they need far more in order to even recognize that they want/need resolution. Have you ever experienced a person who's actions were in opposition to their professed intent? As I already said, the willful contest IS the willing confluence, at the opposite end of the 'will'/expression scale. They are the same, expressed from opposite perspectives.
Lets take the subject of self-destructive behavior, just as an example. Many who engage in such behaviors are not consciously aware of it, and are often very resistant to recognize the behaviors for what they are (IME, with a wealth of rationalizations) for psychological reasons. Even after recognizing such behaviors it can take days, weeks, months, even years to help them to process the experiences from which such behaviors manifest.
It is easy for one person to describe another as being unwilling. I suggest that you express yourself as one who is unwilling, of a polar opposite - and yet simultaneously equatable - nature. You say that there is an unwilling party? I find that there are two, that the perception of unwillingess is ITS SELF a manifestation of uwillingness in the perceiver.
I have found (not exhaustively) that the most adequate, effective, competent, and thorough healers/entrainers/practicioners are those who operate at the threshold between the light and the dark. The 'mechanics' involved pertain to such an individual's ability to critically analyze/assess without convicted preconception or judgement. Further, one at such a position can unbiassedly assist the recipient in whichever direction they are desiring to progress (not everyone seeks to go from the dark to the light). At the balanced threshold one can entrain (or be entrained) in either/any direction, without being convicted to a particular polarity. Additionally there is never a preconception of 'goodness' or 'vileness' (or any other descriptive) as they recognize the balance of both forces operating within and without.
What does this have to do with the topic at hand you might ask? Simple!
If one is adequately balanced one will naturally and even involuntarily entrain balance in others, be they humans, ETs, Djinn, etc. I'm not saying that a balanced individuals will not experience unbalanced individuals, quite the opposite actually. When one is neither the willful nor willing opponent - indeed refusing to oppose - ONLY then can one adequately encourage/assist, and only then can one appreciate the degree to which willful and willing are different expressions of the same phenomenon.
But who am I to say? I'm just some douche on an internet forum!