Read my post again, and then go to Wade Frazier's thread in the priority thread area. Then take a look at his website.Posted by Nick Matkin (here)
Some folks just don't get it.
If it works, and breaks the laws of physics as we presently understand them, scientists will be clambering to learn what they don't understand and apply it to other problems.
I believe it's nonsense to say they'll be fighting their own 'mental block'. People who say that usually have no experience with the scientific method. How and why would you fail just because pesky, sceptical scientists want to ask questions?
I guess it's fine to ignore probing questions if you're busy developing ground-breaking technology; they'll see it soon enough and the doubters will have to eat their words.
As I've already said, when heavier-than-air flight was clearly demonstrated, scientists who said it was impossible ate their words, and got on with developing the jumbo jet. There was no attempt at 'suppressing the technology' because it broke the existing scientific paradigms.
Prove the ******* thing works, get them out and working in the world at large and we'll look on in awe. Otherwise stop wasting everyone's time. Unfortunately there are plenty of folks who are tired of deadline after deadline being missed.
I don't know what sort of physicists you know, but in my experience if they were gathered around a device that was producing more power than it was consuming, clearly being demonstrated in front of them and their test equipment, they'd be beside themselves with excitement!
When will Oxfam be able to buy these devices and light up African villages? By this summer? Christmas? Next spring? We need to know...
Nick
In there you will find over what is probably +30 years of experience in the ACTUAL alternative technology field and how it integrates with the public world.
What you will find is that what I'm saying is the REAL DEAL. My post is dead on, your opinion has no direct or real experience and you have not gone through the process.
If you attempt it any other way, you're going to get your legs and your life cut out from under you, a thousand times over.
This is no joke.
The way I'm saying to go, the direction I'm speaking in, the black ops, military, and corporate groups have done it that way for nearly 100 years.
You are speaking on the question, a question you have no understanding of the meaning of, the scope of it, or the true and real situation that is at hand.
If it does not have guerrilla warfare, secretive, non public, cell type but widespread effort to it, it will fail.
You don't understand.
There are literally groups of trained ops people waiting in the wings to discredit and knock off free energy researchers and their projects, and take their technology. Or to block it as they have it already. Trillions are at stake, and that idea of 'money'....is just one of the minor aspects. The money is nothing, it's a tool, a lever, a method of controlling things --nothing more. A greasy lever and manipulation tool, in the tool kit. The wiping out of entire countries is definitely ON THE TABLE. If that is the final solution it takes to block it, then that is what would happen. They would overrun an entire country, if necessary.
I'm not sure you understand the forces you are up against.
On one hand, we need people out there, in the public, dealing with this head on and in the public eye. To get the message OUT. So, ignorance is a blessing here, as then the word is spread around. Foot soldiers in a parade, marching off the cliff of doom and failure.
At the same time, we need serious efforts that are more clandestine, more sure of themselves, more secretive, and more widespread among people who understand that working with the system (science, physics, academia, media, etc) that is in place, is doomed to failure, as it has been failure, hundreds of times in hundreds of cases.
These things are not abstract idealism, to me. These are hard, known facts, based in viewing the field for decades, watching the flow, and slowly building up knowledge of what is really going on.
I'm talking about understanding that the idea and the technology was real, when I was 18 years old (started looking when I was 13 or so), and then 'interviewing' the subject, and watching it closely..compiling data and collating, researching...for ....+32 years.
If one wants to get possibly killed, but most definitely discredited, and torn down... then they can go ahead and be a foot-soldier in the strictly public face of this 'thing'. But that person will fail. They will be turned down and turned off via every possible method of control and integration with their boundaries and connections in life. The heat will be turned up slowly but as surely as the sun shines. No effort will be spared to make sure that happens, as it has in the hundreds of cases that came before.
One can do some small things quietly, but full scale free energy, in the public eye? No. it has to be slow, widespread, quiet, and as a takeover of the inside track. There will be no Teslas, no Einsteins, no big public heros in this war.
it is a dirty war, a quiet war, a severe war, of the most vicious, brutal, and conniving kind.