+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 87

Thread: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

  1. Link to Post #21
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    How “Extreme Levels” of Roundup in Food Became the Industry Norm
    March 24, 2014
    By Thomas Bøhn and Marek Cuhra

    Food and feed quality are crucial to human and animal health. Quality can be defined as sufficiency of appropriate minerals, vitamins and fats, etc. but it also includes the absence of toxins, whether man-made or from other sources. Surprisingly, almost no data exist in the scientific literature on herbicide residues in herbicide tolerant genetically modified (GM) plants, even after nearly 20 years on the market.

    In research recently published by our laboratory (Bøhn et al. 2014) we collected soybean samples grown under three typical agricultural conditions: organic, GM, and conventional (but non-GM). The GM soybeans were resistant to the herbicide Roundup, whose active ingredient is glyphosate.

    We tested these samples for nutrients and other compounds as well as relevant pesticides, including glyphosate and its principal breakdown product, Aminomethylphosponic acid (AMPA). All of the individual samples of GM-soy contained residues of both glyphosate and AMPA, on average 9.0 mg/kg. This amount is greater than is typical for many vitamins. In contrast, no sample from the conventional or the organic soybeans showed residues of these chemicals (Fig. 1).


    Crop spraying, South Africa, Thomas Bøhn

    This demonstrates that Roundup Ready GM-soybeans sprayed during the growing season take up and accumulate glyphosate and AMPA. Further, what has been considered a working hypothesis for herbicide tolerant crops, i.e. that, as resistant weeds have spread:

    “there is a theoretical possibility that also the level of residues of the herbicide and its metabolites may have increased” (Kleter et al. 2011)

    is now shown to be actually happening.

    Monsanto (manufacturer of glyphosate) has claimed that residues of glyphosate in GM soy are lower than in conventional soybeans, where glyphosate residues have been measured up to 16-17 mg/kg (Monsanto 1999). These residues, found in non-GM plants, likely must have been due to the practice of spraying before harvest (for desiccation). Another claim of Monsanto’s has been that residue levels of up to 5.6 mg/kg in GM-soy represent

    “…extreme levels, and far higher than those typically found” (Monsanto 1999).


    Figure 1. Residues of glyphosate and AMPA in individual soybean samples (n=31). For organic and conventional soybeans, glyphosate residues were below the detection limit.

    Seven out of the 10 GM-soy samples we tested, however, surpassed this “extreme level” (of glyphosate + AMPA), indicating a trend towards higher residue levels. The increasing use of glyphosate on US Roundup Ready soybeans has been documented (Benbrook 2012). The explanation for this increase is the appearance of glyphosate-tolerant weeds (Shaner et al. 2012) to which farmers are responding with increased doses and more applications.

    Maximum residue levels (MRLs) of glyphosate in food and feed
    Globally, glyphosate-tolerant GM soy is the number one GM crop plant and glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide, with a global production of 620 000 tons in 2008 (Pollak 2011). The world soybean production in 2011 was 251.5 million metric tons, with the United States (33%), Brazil (29%), Argentina (19%), China (5%) and India (4%) as the main producing countries (American Soybean Association 2013).

    In 2011-2012, soybeans were planted on about 30 million hectares in the USA, with Roundup Ready GM soy contributing 93-94 % of the production (USDA 2013). Globally, Roundup Ready GM soybeans contributed to 75 % of the production in 2011 (James 2012).

    The legally acceptable level of glyphosate contamination in food and feed, i.e. the maximum residue level (MRL) has been increased by authorities in countries where Roundup-Ready GM crops are produced, or where such commodities are imported. In Brazil, the MRL in soybean was increased from 0.2 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg in 2004: a 50-fold increase, but only for GM-soy. The MRL for glyphosate in soybeans has been increased also in the US and Europe. In Europe, it was raised from 0.1 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg (a 200-fold increase) in 1999, and the same MRL of 20 mg/kg was adopted by the US. In all of these cases, MRL values appear to have been adjusted, not based on new scientific evidence, but pragmatically in response to actual observed increases in the content of residues in glyphosate-tolerant GM soybeans.

    Has the toxicity of Roundup been greatly underestimated?
    When regulatory agencies assess pesticides for safety they invariably test only the claimed active ingredient.

    Nevertheless, these do not necessarily represent realistic conditions since in practice it is the full, formulated herbicide (there are many Roundup formulations) that is used in the field. Thus, it is relevant to consider, not only the active ingredient, in this case glyphosate and its breakdown product AMPA, but also the other compounds present in the herbicide formulation since these enhance toxicity. For example, formulations of glyphosate commonly contain adjuvants and surfactants to stabilize and facilitate penetration into the plant tissue. Polyoxyethylene amine (POEA) and polyethoxylated tallowamine (POE-15) are common ingredients in Roundup formulations and have been shown to contribute significantly to toxicity (Moore et al. 2012).

    Our own recent study in the model organism Daphnia magna demonstrated that chronic exposure to glyphosate and a commercial formulation of Roundup resulted in negative effects on several life-history traits, in particular reproductive aberrations like reduced fecundity and increased abortion rate, at environmental concentrations of 0.45-1.35 mg/liter (active ingredient), i.e. below accepted environmental tolerance limits set in the US (0.7 mg/liter) (Cuhra et al. 2013). A reduced body size of juveniles was even observed at an exposure to Roundup at 0.05 mg/liter.

    This is in sharp contrast to world-wide regulatory assumptions in general, which we have found to be strongly influenced by early industry studies and in the case of aquatic ecotoxicity assessment, to be based on 1978 and 1981 studies presented by Monsanto claiming that glyphosate is virtually non-toxic in D. magna (McAllister & Forbis, 1978; Forbis & Boudreau, 1981).

    Thus a worrisome outlook for health and the environment can be found in the combination of i) the vast increase in use of glyphosate-based herbicides, in particular due to glyphosate-tolerant GM plants, and ii) new findings of higher toxicity of both glyphosate as an active ingredient (Cuhra et al., 2013) and increased toxicity due to contributions from chemical adjuvants in commercial formulations (Annett et al. 2014).

    A similar situation can be found for other pesticides. Mesnage et al. (2014) found that 8 out of 9 tested pesticides were more toxic than their declared active principles.

    This means that the Accepted Daily Intake (ADI) for humans, i.e. what society finds “admissible” regarding pesticide residues may have been set too high, even before potential combinatorial effects of different chemical exposures are taken into account.

    For glyphosate formulations (Roundup), realistic exposure scenarios in the aquatic environment may harm non-target biodiversity from microorganisms, invertebrates, amphibians and fish, (reviewed in Annett et al. 2014) indicating that the environmental consequences of these agrochemicals need to be re-assessed.

    Other compositional differences between GM, non-GM, and organic
    Our research also demonstrated that different agricultural practices lead to markedly different end products. Data on other measured compositional characteristics could be used to discriminate statistically all individual soy samples (without exception) into their respective agricultural practice background (Fig. 2).

    Figure 2. Discriminant analysis for GM, conventional and organic soy samples based on 35 variables. Data was standardized (mean = 0 and SD = 1).

    Organic soybeans showed the healthiest nutritional profile with more glucose, fructose, sucrose and maltose, significantly more total protein, zinc and less fiber, compared with both conventional and GM-soy. Organic soybeans contained less total saturated fat and total omega-6 fatty acids than both conventional and GM-soy.

    Conclusion
    Roundup Ready GM-soy accumulates residues of glyphosate and AMPA, and also differs markedly in nutritional composition compared to soybeans from other agricultural practices. Organic soybean samples also showed a more healthy nutritional profile (e.g. higher in protein and lower in saturated fatty acids) than both industrial conventional and GM soybeans.

    Lack of data on pesticide residues in major crop plants is a serious gap of knowledge with potential consequences for human and animal health. How is the public to trust a risk assessment system that has overlooked the most obvious risk factor for herbicide tolerant GM crops, i.e. high residue levels of herbicides, for nearly 20 years? If it has been due to lack of understanding, it would be bad. If it is the result of the producer’s power to influence the risk assessment system, it would be worse.

    References
    American Soy Association, Soystats. 2013. 16-5-2013.
    Annett, R., Habibi, H. R. and Hontela, A. 2014. Impact of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides on the freshwater environment. – Journal of Applied Toxicology DOI 10.1002/jat.2997.
    Aumaitre, L. A. 2002. New feeds from genetically modified plants: substantial equivalence, nutritional equivalence and safety for animals and animal products. – Productions Animales 15: 97-108.
    Benbrook, C. M. 2012. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. – the first sixteen years. – Environmental Science Europe 24:24.
    Binimelis, R., Pengue, W. and Monterroso, I. 2009. “Transgenic treadmill”: Responses to the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Argentina. – Geoforum 40: 623-633.
    Bøhn, T., Cuhra, M., Traavik, T., Sanden, M., Fagan, J. and Primicerio, R. 2014. Compositional differences in soybeans on the market: Glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans. – Food Chemistry 153: 207-215.
    Cuhra, M., Traavik, T. and Bøhn, T. 2013. Clone- and age-dependent toxicity of a glyphosate commercial formulation and its active ingredient in Daphnia magna. – Ecotoxicology 22: 251-262 (open access). DOI 10.1007/s10646-012-1021-1.
    Duke, S. O., Rimando, A. M., Pace, P. F., Reddy, K. N. and Smeda, R. J. 2003. Isoflavone, glyphosate, and aminomethylphosphonic acid levels in seeds of glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean. – Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 340-344.
    EC . Review report for the active substance glyphosate. 6511/VI/99-final, 1-56. 2002. European Commission. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General.
    Forbis, A.D., Boudreau, P. 1981. Acute toxicity of MON0139 (Lot LURT 12011)(AB-81-074) To Daphnia magna: Static acute bio- assay report no. 27203. Unpublished study document from US EPA library
    Harrigan, G. G., Ridley, G., Riordan, S. G., Nemeth, M. A., Sorbet, R., Trujillo, W. A., Breeze, M. L. and Schneider, R. W. 2007. Chemical composition of glyphosate-tolerant soybean 40–3-2 grown in Europe remains equivalent with that of conventional soybean (Glycine max L.). – Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 55: 6160-6168.
    James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012. ISAAA Brief No. 44. 2012. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
    Kleter, G. A., Unsworth, J. B. and Harris, C. A. 2011. The impact of altered herbicide residues in transgenic herbicide-resistant crops on standard setting for herbicide residues. – Pest Management Science 67: 1193-1210.
    McAllister, W., Forbis A. 1978. Acute toxicity of technical glyphosate (AB–78–201) to Daphnia magna. Study reviewed and approved 8–30–85 by EEB/HED
    Mesnage, R., Defarge, N., Vendômois, J. S. and Seralini, G. E. 2014. Major pesticides are more toxic to human cells than their declared active principles. – BioMed Research International http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/179691.
    Monsanto . Residues in Roundup Ready soya lower than conventional soy. http://www.monsanto.co.uk/news/99/ju...9_residue.html . 1999.
    Moore, L. J., Fuentes, L., Rodgers, J. H., Bowerman, W. W., Yarrow, G. K., Chao, W. Y. and Bridges, W. C. 2012. Relative toxicity of the components of the original formulation of Roundup (R) to five North American anurans. – Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 78: 128-133.
    Pollak, P. 2011. Fine chemicals: the industry and the business. – Wiley.
    Shaner, D. L., Lindenmeyer, R. B. and Ostlie, M. H. 2012. What have the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate taught us? – Pest Management Science 68: 3-9.
    USDA . National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2013. 16-5-2013.

    The Authors:
    Thomas Bøhn
    GenØk – Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø, Norway
    Professor of Gene Ecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
    Marek Cuhra
    GenØk – Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø, Norway
    PhD student, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

    Comment:
    Michelle Denise says: March 31, 2014 at 7:22 am
    We in Australia are just taking up GM. Within a couple of years we have had non-GM farms and organic farms contaminated. The agenda is to contaminate. Any number of petitions have been ignored. Luckily some farmers are waking up to the glyphosate and resistance problems as well as increased costs and decreased yields of GM – these farmers are not planting GM canola this year. However the pressure on non GM farmers and non-GM states in Australia is being applied. Monsanto has the ear of our governments. In Western Australia Monsanto has taken over 26% of our public grain research facility, Intergrain and they are vying for another 20%. Monsanto is also trying to get GM wheat tested in Australia. They have taken over some of our university agricultural research departments as well. Unfortunately most of our population don’t care or can’t see the danger to our own viable wheat industy, and our health.


    SOTT-Comment: The author's of the article ask an important question in the conclusion of their study 'How is the public to trust a risk assessment system that has overlooked the most obvious risk factor for herbicide tolerant GM crops, i.e. high residue levels of herbicides?' The links below can answer the author's questions. It becomes obvious, based on published data, that the biotech industry KNOWs the obvious risk factor of herbicide tolerant GM crops:
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (29th May 2014), Christine (11th November 2014), Daughter of Time (30th May 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), gnostic9 (30th May 2014), KiwiElf (6th October 2014), Paul (31st May 2014)

  3. Link to Post #22
    Avalon Member avid's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Location
    NW UK
    Posts
    2,229
    Thanks
    28,788
    Thanked 9,450 times in 1,999 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    I have just had a long talk with Tesco (UK) Customer Services about their promotion of Roundup, wiping a leaf with it's 'gel' and a terrible death to the plant. However, if a pet or a child gets this stuff on them, what happens to them? Toxic, carcinogenic - absolutely criminal irreverance to life by Monsanto. Proven to be dangerous. Banned in lots of countries. Why allow it in the UK? Why are Tesco heavily promoting it on the TV, and why are the Co-operative Supermarkets (supposedly very 'green') in the UK selling this vile stuff?

    Have also copied this to Cooperative Stores in the UK, via their customer services.
    Last edited by avid; 29th May 2014 at 17:48.
    The love you withhold is the pain that you carry
    and er..
    "Chariots of the Globs" (apols to Fat Freddy's Cat)

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to avid For This Post:

    Becky (11th November 2014), Christine (11th November 2014), Cidersomerset (20th September 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), gnostic9 (30th May 2014), Hervé (29th May 2014)

  5. Link to Post #23
    Avalon Member Lifebringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th December 2010
    Posts
    4,392
    Thanks
    6,806
    Thanked 11,706 times in 3,534 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Monster powers that were, BE GONE!
    In the name of all that is holy the son of God and Creator, please rid us of these evil people.
    How long Father?
    How long the suffering of the whole of man, for the few corrupt maladjusted and heartless, loveless souls who have money?
    Are these money changers to use us as plastic soldiers on some corporate boardroom game?
    Is this "not" allowed in the freedom of choice, without justice to those whose choice is to hurt your creations?
    Father come and protect us in the name of your son Jesus the Christ of justice.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lifebringer For This Post:

    Cidersomerset (20th September 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015)

  7. Link to Post #24
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Vaccines and depopulation experiments

    Jon Rappoport
    WordPress
    Mon, 15 Sept., 2014 00:00 CEST
    SOTT.net reblog: http://www.sott.net/article/285879-V...on-experiments

    Quote "When the State offers and even insists on giving everybody something, you know you're in trouble. Well, that's the whole point, isn't it? Leaving the individual out of the equation. Treating the population like a single Blob." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

    © www.dailystormer.com
    So many folks, so many ways, so little time...

    Before we get to vaccines, I want to give you a quote about fluorides, just to set the stage.

    Stan Freni is a researcher who, in 1994, wrote a paper about fluorides, the substances in many toothpastes, also pumped intentionally into the drinking water of many communities and cities. Funny thing is, Stan Freni wrote his paper as an employee for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

    The title of the paper is "Exposure to High Fluoride Concentrations in Drinking Water is Associated With Decreased Birth Rates." It was published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (v.42,pp.109-121, 1994). Freni writes:

    Quote "A US database of drinking water systems was used to identify index counties with water systems reporting fluoride levels of at least 3ppm (parts per million)...the annual total fertility rate (TFR) for women in the age range 10-49 yr. was calculated for the period 1970-1988...Most regions showed an association of decreasing TFR with increasing fluoride levels."
    Increasing fluoride levels, lower fertility rates. Depopulation here in the US, right in your water. So don't imagine depopulation is an esoteric subject.

    Let's move on.

    You have to understand that every promoted so-called "pandemic" is an extended sales pitch for vaccines. And not just a vaccine against the "killer germ" of the moment. We're talking about a psyop to condition the population to vaccines in general.


    © socioecohistory.wordpress.com

    Quote "... the true concern of Kissinger analysts [in Memorandum 200] was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the 'political consequences' of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability ... With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] 'the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.'"
    In other words, too many people equals disruption for the transnational corporations, who steal nations from those very people.


    SOTT.net Comment:
    Quote Memorandum 200 was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in 1975. Thirteen countries were named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests and mineral resources: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia and Brazil. These countries were projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth. It also raised the question of whether the U.S. should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states that are deemed constructive in use of population control measures.
    Does this remind you of what is happening in West Africa now, re "the Ebola crisis?" Lockdown. Borders sealed. Over the past five years, several vaccine campaigns - and who knows what other vectors for the transmission of toxic elements to the population.

    Cockburn notes that the writers of the Kissinger memo "favored sterilization over food aid." He goes on to say that "By 1977, Reimart Ravenholt, the director of USAID's [US Agency for International Development] population program, was saying that his agency's goal was to sterilize one-quarter of the world's women."

    There were unconfirmed reports from the Philippines and Mexico that their 1993 tetanus vaccination programs - which were supposedly administered only to women of childbearing age - involved multiple injections.

    Tetanus vaccine protocols indicate that one injection is good for ten years. Therefore, multiple injections would indicate another motive for the vaccinations - such as the anti-fertility effect of hCG planted in the vaccine. My inquiries to Philippine officials went unanswered.

    The Population Research Institute, in the November/December 1996 issue of its Review, published a report by David Morrison.

    Morrison stated, "Philippine women may have been unwittingly vaccinated against their own children, a recent study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) has indicated."The study tested random samples of a tetanus vaccine for the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone essential to the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy ... The PMA's positive test results indicate that just such an abortifacient may have been administered to Philippine women without their consent.

    Quote "The PMA notified the Philippine Department of Health (PDOH) of these findings in a 16 September letter signed by the researchers and certified by its President. Using an immunological assay developed by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, a three-doctor research panel tested forty-seven vials of tetanus vaccine collected at random from various health centers in Luzon and Mindanao. Nine were found to contain hCG in levels ranging from 0.191680 mIU/ml to 3.046061 mIU/ml. These vaccines, most of which were labeled as of Canadian origin, were supplied by the World Health Organization as part of a WHO-sponsored [sterilization] vaccination program."

    © thegundeck.blogspot.com

    Healthy 16-year-old Aussi whose womanhood has been stolen by Gardasil, now in menopause, her ovaries irrevocably shut down.

    Morrison's article would seem to indicate that the vials of vaccine tested came from a widespread immunization campaign rather than from a small pilot study of a few women.

    The Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation was created at the World Health Organization in 1973. Ute Sprenger, writing in Biotechnology and Development Monitor (December 1995) describes the Task Force:

    Quote "...a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D...such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG."
    Sprenger indicates that, as of 1995, there were several large groups researching these vaccines. Among them:

    * WHO/HRP. HRP is the Special Progamme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, located in Switzerland. It is funded by "the governments of Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Germany and Canada, as well as the UNFPA and the World Bank."

    * The Population Council. It's a US group funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institutes of Health [a US federal agency], and the US Agency for International Development [USAID, notorious for its collaborations with the CIA].

    * National Institute of Immunology. Located in India, "major funders are the Indian government, the Canadian International Development Research Center and the [ubiquitous] Rockefeller Foundation."

    * The Center for Population Research, located at the US National Institute of Child Health and Development [!], which is part of the US National Institutes of Health.

    The Lancet, 4 June, 1998, p.1272: "During the recent National Immunisation Campaign (vaccination for childhood diseases and tetanus toxoid for pregnant women), in some villages [of Thailand] the women escaped and hid in the bushes thinking that they were going to be given injections to stop them having children."

    AP, Boston Globe, October 10, 1992, "Birth-control vaccine is reported in India": "Scientists said yesterday they have created the first birth-control shot for women, effective for an entire year...[after which] a booster shot is needed."
    There are other citations from published medical literature - but you get the idea: vaccines as depopulation instruments.

    And the hCG versions I refer to appear to be crude efforts. Who knows what levels of sophistication have been achieved in secret?

    West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu, Ebola - the real motive for promoting these "pandemics" is the follow-up: vaccines.

    To a highly significant degree, the CDC and the World Health Organization are PR agencies, whose job is to convince the public that stepping up, rolling up their sleeves, and submitting to shots containing germs and toxic chemicals is the most natural and wise action possible.

    Yes, and ignorance is strength.

    The Matrix is designed inside out and upside down.

    Jon Rappoport

    Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health.

    SOTT.net Comment:
    Quote President Obama's top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book, Ecoscience, in which he advocated the formation of a "planetary regime" that would use a "global police force" to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children. Proposed or already covertly being implemented:

    - Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nation's water and food supply.

    - Legalizing "compulsory abortions," ie forced abortions carried out against the will of the pregnant women, as is common place in Communist China where women who have already had one child and refuse to abort the second are kidnapped off the street by the authorities before a procedure is carried out to forcibly abort the baby.

    - Babies who are born out of wedlock or to teenage mothers to be forcibly taken away from their mother by the government and put up for adoption. Another proposed measure would force single mothers to demonstrate to the government that they can care for the child, effectively introducing licensing to have children.

    - Implementing a system of "involuntary birth control," where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby.

    - Permanently sterilizing people who the authorities deem have already had too many children or who have contributed to "general social deterioration".

    - Formally passing a law that criminalizes having more than two children, similar to the one child policy in Communist China.

    - This would all be overseen by a transnational and centralized "planetary regime" that would utilize a "global police force" to enforce the measures outlined above. The "planetary regime" would also have the power to determine population levels for every country in the world.

    Off-topic FYI: This issue is more prescient than ever because Holdren and his colleagues are now at the forefront of efforts to combat "climate change" through similarly insane programs focused around geoengineering the planet. Holdren recently advocated "Large-scale geoengineering projects designed to cool the Earth," such as "shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays," which many have pointed out is already occurring via chemtrails.

    Obama Science Advisor Called For "Planetary Regime" To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control Measures

    Other links:

    [2014 March] Tetanus Vaccines Sterilizing Women In Kenya? Catholic Church There Raises Suspicions

    [2012 Oct] Gardasil Destroys Girl's Ovaries: It Should Have Been Predicted

    [2012 June] Rockefeller Foundation Admitted Funding, Developing Anti-fertility Vaccines Intended for "Mass-scale Distribution"

    [2011 Nov] UN, Bill Gates Foundation Push Deadly HPV Shots on Poor Nations Under 'GAVI Alliance' by Anthony Gucciardi

    [2010 Nov. Gardasil testimony. MS. BOYCE] Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting Transcript

    [2010 Sept] Death by Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics by Richard Gale & Gary Null

    [2009 July Swine flu vaccine] Natural Solutions Alert by Gabriel Cousens, M.D.

    [Aug 2008] Massive Brazilian Vaccination Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Program

    [2008] Polysorbate 80 Causes Infertility by Joanna Karpasea-Jones

    [Video] Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda David Ayoub, M.D.

    and there are a slew more of these! What's in YOUR water?
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Christine (11th November 2014), Cidersomerset (20th September 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), Jean-Marie (20th September 2014), KiwiElf (6th October 2014), spiritwind (6th October 2014)

  9. Link to Post #25
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    58
    Posts
    22,337
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,240 times in 18,665 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Related articles on Davids site....


    Activist Post......



    U.N. Agenda 21 Testing Ground: Malaysia’s 10 Ideas For Sustainable Development
    Friday 19th September 2014 at 08:01 By david-icke

    ‘The full implementation of Agenda 21 is nearing completion as the global
    Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations are set on a 2015 timeline.
    There are already many hints available at the wide-scale transformation set to take
    place, as multiple locations in the United States continue doing battle with the
    arrival of sweeping bureaucratic code enforcement.

    Agenda 21 is a U.N.-directed action plan that has so many tentacles, it is often
    difficult to see this creature in its entirety. Essentially, using the threat of climate
    change and overpopulation as core global concerns, a mountain of new regulations
    forcing local communities to adopt global directives will usher in global governance
    literally from the ground up.



    http://www.activistpost.com/2014/09/...malaysias.html

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Christine (11th November 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), Hervé (20th September 2014), KiwiElf (6th October 2014), spiritwind (6th October 2014)

  11. Link to Post #26
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    58
    Posts
    22,337
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,240 times in 18,665 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    This was a scary little vid that popped up while I was googling.....




    The Mindset of the Ruling Elite - Depopulation
    .
    Uploaded on 23 Apr 2011


    Those running (ruining) the world today, think in exactly the same way as
    Bernard Shaw and all the other Eugenicists of the 19th / 20th centuries.

    Vaccines, Fluoridated Water, Bisphenol A in plastics, Pesticides, Soya
    (so-called "health food") and Genetically Modified foods, can cause Sterility
    in humans. And they're all promoted from the very same people who believe
    that the earth is overpopulated. Are they secretly Sterilizing the population?
    A chemical assault upon humanity?

    Listen to Bill Gates say that Vaccines will be used to lower Population:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-lqDM...
    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 21st September 2014 at 16:10.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), spiritwind (6th October 2014)

  13. Link to Post #27
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    58
    Posts
    22,337
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,240 times in 18,665 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset

    Sunday 21st September 2014 at 05:33 By david-icke




    Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset

    Eugenics
    Social Engineering

    by Zen Gardner - Sep 20, 2014




    ‘Let’s suppose the elitist scum working to ruin and control our lives and planet are in
    some fashion real people to some extent. I know, a stretch, but let’s try. So how can
    they perpetrate such horrors on humanity? How could such madness be justified in the
    minds of men, however psychopathic?

    Actually, it’s easy. For self promotion, preservation and power they’ve allowed themselves
    to be convinced the power is theirs and the right thing to do. But what’s their fundamental
    tenet for mass murder?

    Everything they think and believe is a fabricated bastardization and reversal of any real
    Truth, but in their minds they’ve decided this wicked, inhuman illuminist takeover makes
    sense to them. Especially with their fat cheeks being firmly ensconced in the seats of power.’


    Oh, the vestiges of their human conscience may give some of them a nudge in some cases,
    but it’s been shut down almost completely for most of them. It has to be. You can’t have
    empathy and wreak such death dealing havoc on nature and humanity.

    If you’ve ever known or observed a pathological liar, this cauterized mindset is their way of
    life. Politicians do it without the slightest compunction. To them it’s part of the job description
    for ruling the unwashed masses. How is it justified logically? The old “necessary evil” ruse, as
    in the justification for 9/11 and myriad of other actions.

    The even more amazing thing is that they smugly revel in this ugliness, thinking they’re the “good guys”.

    Convincing the Cattle to Die – Eugenics Justifies All

    Think about it. What a slam dunk for world domination to so twist perception to where humanity
    is the problem that needs to be curtailed by draconian controls while being systematically
    exterminated like a pest infestation. Be it engineered wars, poverty and food shortages; drugging,
    corrupted food, and water; dumbed down information and media, or injecting toxins in our bodies,
    all is fair game to them.

    Eugenics is the “tie that binds”, the glue that holds all the other lies conveniently together. And it
    takes the sting out of outright mass murder. For them. It’s a “cleaning” and “preparation” for their
    desired world to come.

    Look what Agenda 21 controls are perpetrated via things like climate change and CO2 fabrications.
    Sure, we’re in the throes of massive climate extremes for many reasons, many of them geoengineered,
    but to blame it on cattle flatulence and human breathing must be some kind of macabre inside joke.
    Bottom line is they are planning a great “culling of the herd” and need our permission. We’ve read
    about it for decades in their elitist writings, and this is how they justify it and hope to convince us as
    much as possible of the same. That’s the alert.

    Remember, not waking up and saying no is ultimately humanity’s imprimatur that it agrees. That’s
    where empowerment comes in. We can say no and reverse all this, just as we’ve done in many instances.
    But the awakened shout out needs to be immediate and insistent.



    A Little Background

    As eugenics, called the “self-direction of human evolution”, grew out of its inception in the 1800’s,
    it was considered the harmonious result of all branches of science. The US was the first to implement
    eugenics programs as early as 1908 and it gained a lot of popularity and traction. What stopped it in
    its tracks, at least in public opinion, was the Nazi implementation of eugenics during WW2 to the obvious
    horror of all, however backed by the American program and exaggerated by Zionists.

    This would later turn out to be an amazingly cunning pre-planned propaganda tool as we’ll discuss below.

    But now look how this eugenics campaign has been revived and is currently perpetrated. With innocuous
    sounding names like Planned Parenthood to the UN’s dastardly Agenda 21, the mass hive mind sees
    these measures as “progress” while knowing little to nothing about the extensive anti-human nevermind
    anti-freedom measures being foisted upon them.

    And it’s not just genetic culling, it’s mass population reduction.

    An elitist think tank called The Club of Rome set the latest stage for this last push to demonize humanity
    with the contrived invention of militant, invasive environmentalism. This appeared around the same time
    as the widely sensationalized “population bomb” concept. While real ecology and conservationism make
    common sense, this environmental agenda was created with the specific intention to foist massive controls
    over human activities. That we’re now at the incredulous point of having to pay a literal carbon tax is a total
    giveaway of their fraudulent intentions.

    Yet few catch on.

    And again, like the lie of human caused global warming, we should feel guilty for being alive, to such an
    extent that even our breath is supposedly killing the planet.

    Insane. Yet they keep pushing their agenda regardless of real scientific data to the contrary.




    Bill Gates Vaccines

    The Cauterized Mind of Dystopians

    While humanity doesn’t share the bestial mindset of the elites and their occult driven agenda, these pounding
    programs wear on people. Over time the continued onslaught of these nonsensical anti-truths start to wear a
    groove in the mass mind.

    The psycho-trauma tool of choice? Cognitive dissonance.

    Resistance subsides as seemingly contrary understandings–in this case, “I’m a sovereign human being who
    deserves life and freedom” vs. “I’m a parasitic organism killing my host planet and need to be eradicated”.
    Screwy, but that’s what it boils down to.

    And what gets synthesized in the mind to reconcile the two? “I guess they know what they’re doing. Gee, we
    are bad and something needs to be done.” It doesn’t really make sense so the overload causes a shutdown
    and back to the TV and ball game they go, acquiescing by apathy.

    Once again, the intended solution being foisted on society gains traction.

    And daring to oppose this new status-quo? It has now been cleverly engineered to be tantamount to terrorism,
    the ultimate behavioral catch-all.

    Game. Set. Match…or so they think.



    stealing-of-palestinian-land-by-israel-with-the-help-of-the-west

    Zio-Kabbalism – An Identifiable Virus Form

    While the arrogant, intellectual roots of modern eugenics seem to escape mainstream consciousness, obvious
    forms of racism and genocidal extermination, as recently exposed in the latest Gaza genocide, have been much
    more evident. That the two are intrinsically connected takes one to the much deeper understanding of what’s
    really going on on this planet – the elimination of more conscious and rooted indigenous forms of humanity and
    the subjugation of the remaining human race and its ultimate manipulation into a non-questioning subservient
    form actually loving its enslavement.

    Yes, just like the predictive programming evidenced in literature and film making for centuries.

    The Zionist mindset with its Kabbalistic occult sense of supremacism is a clear example of justified extermination
    of “lesser” beings. An incredible “in your face” example that the world turns a blind eye to. Instead, they fall for
    the big lie created by the engineered German holocaust that the perpetrators of this current extermination of their
    “inferiors” as manifested in the millions of killed and displaced Palestinians, is somehow because the killers are
    the potential victims.

    That’s how they work. Manipulate history and pound the manipulated message home via propaganda. That simple
    – as long as you have a complicit media and engorging codependent governments. Behold the birth of the Zionist
    parasite called Israel. A perfect example of the sick fruits of eugenically driven, ravenous psychotic behavior,

    When people wake up to that mechanism blood will run hot and heavy and they’ll get their due. They always
    have and always will.

    Evil dies from its own corrupted aberration. As in the human body, the protective immune system of the Universe
    will eventually disable and recycle these invaders.

    01gleaqaci

    The Interdimensional Connection

    In a Universe of boundless life and energy we know entities of all types exist, which even so-called modern scientists
    affirm. Dimensions abound beyond ours and they’re here and interacting with our world.

    This reality must play heavily into our personal understanding of our interdimensional cosmos. We’re a world under
    siege, and we need to know our enemies as well as our friends. That such forces of darkness can mount such a
    profoundly coordinated attack on a planet of mainly meek, loving inhabitants reeks of opportunity for an aggressive
    force. I don’t know exactly what’s going on but I hope this helps present the case for what we’re potentially up against.

    Inter-dimensional war.



    I would be remiss without pointing out these otherworldly influences on our three dimensional experience. There is
    much more than meets the physical eye as we well know. People are driven by many influences, and spiritual ones
    are the most profound. Religions dutifully categorize such concepts as good and bad influences, while metaphysics
    dissects these various aspects with intrigue. Psychic, transcendental and after death phenomena also abound.

    So please don’t tell me there’s nothing more than this observable world.

    loveunitydance01

    The Antidote – Disengage and Live in Truth and Love



    Never give in mentally or spiritually to this onslaught. While we need to stay active in exposing their perfidy, we
    cannot be part of their ensnaring mindset.

    That’s why turning off all forms of mainstream media is so important. That’s why immersion in positive influences,
    nature, and loving people to counter these types of realities is so important.

    Anyone in their right mind knows this kind of plan cannot succeed in the long run. We happen to be at a time in
    history where these negative, barbaric influences are peaking with the acceleration of hijacked technologies.

    This too shall pass. But we should be vigilant and prepare as best we can, without fear. It’s a time to grow in
    consciousness and communication with each other so we can share our combined knowledge, insights and loving support.

    Therein is life, one day at a time. As it always is.

    Much love, Zen


    Read more: Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset


    http://www.zengardner.com/eugenics-p...on-sanctified/
    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 21st September 2014 at 16:11.

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Becky (11th November 2014), Christine (11th November 2014), fourty-two (9th June 2015), KiwiElf (6th October 2014), spiritwind (6th October 2014)

  15. Link to Post #28
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes

    Christina England
    October 5 2014



    As Bill Gates faces a lawsuit for the illegal testing of tribal children in India, it appears that his crimes against humanity have finally caught up with him.

    A recent report published by Health Impact News has reported that the Gates Foundation has found itself facing a pending lawsuit, due to an investigation that is being carried out by the Supreme Courts of India.

    Health Impact News stated:

    Quote “While fraud and corruption are revealed on almost a daily basis now in the vaccine industry, the U.S. mainstream media continues to largely ignore such stories. Outside the U.S., however, the vaccine empires are beginning to crumble, and English versions of the news in mainstream media outlets are available via the Internet.

    One such country is India, where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their vaccine empire are under fire, including a pending lawsuit currently being investigated by the India Supreme Court.” [1]
    The Health Impact News article centered largely on a four-page report that was recently published by Economic Times India.

    Eager to know more, I investigated their story and discovered that the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation and two organizations funded by them, PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health) and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), have found themselves under fire, after a writ of petition originally submitted to the Supreme Court of India, by Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot and Dr. Rukmini Rao in 2012, was finally heard by the courts.

    The petitioners submitting the petition stated:

    Quote “BMGF, PATH and WHO were criminally negligent trialling the vaccines on a vulnerable, uneducated and under-informed population school administrators, students and their parents who were not provided informed consent or advised of potential adverse effects or required to be monitored post-vaccination.” [2]
    Young Tribal Girls Tested With HPV Vaccines
    The Economic Times India published their report August 2014. They stated that in 2009, tests had been carried out on 16,000 tribal school children in Andhra Pradesh, India, using the human papiloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil.

    According to the report written by KP Narayana Kumar, within a month of receiving the vaccine, many of the children fell ill and by 2010, five of them had died. A further two children were reported to have died in Vadodara, Gujarat, where an estimated 14,000 tribal children were vaccinated with another brand of the HPV vaccine, Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmitheKline (GSK).

    Shockingly, the report stated that many of the consent forms used to vaccinate the girls were signed “illegally,” either by the wardens from the hostels where many of the girls resided, or using thumbprints from illiterate parents.

    This travesty was not discovered until a team of health activists from the non-government organization SAMA, an organization specializing in women’s health, decided to investigate what had been going on.

    According to the report, they were shocked to discover that a total of 120 girls had been taken ill, suffering from a variety of symptoms, including “epileptic seizures, severe stomach aches, headaches and mood swings.”

    The Economic Times stated:

    Quote “The Sama report also said there had been cases of early onset of menstruation following the vaccination, heavy bleeding and severe menstrual cramps among many students. The standing committee pulled up the relevant state governments for the shoddy investigation into these deaths.

    It said it was disturbed to find that ‘all the seven deaths were summarily dismissed as unrelated to vaccinations without in-depth investigations …’ the speculative causes were suicides, accidental drowning in well (why not suicide?), malaria, viral infections, subarachnoid hemorrhage (without autopsy) etc.”
    This information is even more shocking when you discover that the organization funding the study was none other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who declared the project a total success.

    Kumar wrote:

    Quote “According to the BMGF, the WHO, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India have all recommended vaccination ‘as a proven and highly effective preventive measure for cervical cancer.’ The project used vaccines that are licensed in India and that have been administered safely around the world tens of millions of times, preventing countless cases of cervical cancer illness and death, ‘maintains a BMGF spokesperson in an emailed response (see GAVI & PHFI create incentives …’”
    He continued:

    Quote “BMGF’s role in funding the controversial studies, however, has led to many healthcare activists in India voicing their apprehensions. ‘BMGF has to take full responsibility because PATH is funded by them. It is also unethical when people championing the cause of vaccines are the same ones who are also investing in vaccine development,’ said V Rukmini Rao, one of the activists who filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court in connection with the HPV vaccine studies.” [3]
    Absolutely, and this is not the first time that these organizations have been caught illegally testing vaccines in developing countries.

    Gates Foundation, WHO, PATH, GAVI, UNICEF Behind Chad Vaccine Disaster
    In December 2012, in the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert, five hundred children were locked into their school, threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine, they would receive no further education.

    These children were vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge. This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing.

    Within hours, one hundred and six children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis. The children’s wait for a doctor began. They had to wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators proceeded to vaccinate others in the village.

    When the doctor finally came, he could do nothing for the children. The team of vaccinators, upon seeing what had happened, fled the village in fear.

    The original report written in a small, local newspaper called La Voix, the only newspaper to have published the original story, stated that forty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad.


    After being shuttled around like cattle, many of these sick, weak children were finally dumped back in their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. No forms were signed and no documentation was seen. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury.

    However, if this were true, why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described as hush money?

    The only mainstream news channel to have highlighted the plight of these poor children was a local channel called Tchad, which filmed footage of the then-Prime Minister of Chad visiting the children in hospital.

    VacTruth has copies of both reports, along with medical and government documents.

    Despite this evidence and VacTruth’s detailed and extensive coverage, including highlighting television footage, once again, the vaccine program was hailed a success. To watch videos reporting the story, see the references at the end of this article. [4] [5]

    The groups involved with this project were PATH, WHO, UNICEF, and the Gates Foundation. During investigations, it was discovered that the whole project was being run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

    In a press release, the Gates Foundation stated:

    Quote “MenAfriVac is a tremendous success story for the global health community. It is the first vaccine developed specifically for Africa, and it proves that global partnerships can develop and deliver high-quality, low-cost vaccines.

    Ten years ago, we invested in the Meningitis Vaccine Project, an innovative model that brought together PATH, the World Health Organization, African health ministers and the Serum Institute of India today, we celebrate the result: a modern vaccine selling for less than US 50 cents per dose with the potential to end Africa’s deadly meningitis epidemics.

    We believe that vaccines are one of the best buys in global health. In January, Bill and Melinda Gates called on the global community to make this the Decade of Vaccines. There is no better way to launch this decade than with a new vaccine that will improve and save lives.” [6]
    VacTruth can prove otherwise.

    Government Inquiry Holds GAVI Accountable for Multiple Deaths
    Despite the fact the Gates Foundation call vaccines “one of the best buys in global health,” a government inquiry in Pakistan has found the complete opposite.

    In 2011, the Express Tribune published a story stating that:

    Quote “ISLAMABAD: A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan.

    The startling revelation is part of an inquiry report prepared by the Prime Minister’s Inspection Commission (PMIC) on the working of the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). The PMIC, headed by Malik Amjad Noon, has recommended that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani immediately suspend the administration of all types of vaccines funded by the GAVI.”
    According to the Express Tribune, the main vaccinations in question were the polio vaccine and the 5-in-1 pentavelent vaccine, which were said to be responsible for the deaths and disability of a number of children in Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Japan.

    The vaccines were funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization (GAVI) an organization financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank.

    Writing on the official report, made exclusive to the newspaper, the Express Tribune stated:

    Quote “The report states, ‘The procured vaccines are not tested in laboratories to confirm their efficacy and genuineness. This leaves room for use of spurious and counterfeit vaccines.’” [7] (emphasis added)
    If this is true, then once again the Gates Foundation has been linked to mass vaccination initiatives using untested, unsafe vaccinations.

    The Gates Foundation and WHO Labeled Unethical by Medical Experts
    In 2012, Ramesh Shankar Mumbai, an author writing for the Pharmabiz website, reported that two medical experts from India had accused the Gates Foundation and WHO of being unethical.

    In his report, Mumbai stated that Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Pediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital in Delhi, wrote the following information in their report in the April issue of Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.

    Quote “It was unethical for WHO and Bill Gates to flog this program when they knew 10 years back that it was never to succeed. Getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical.”
    Pharmabiz.com reported that Dr. Vashisht and Dr. Puliyel had continued their report by stating:

    Quote “Another major ethical issue raised by the campaign is the failure to thoroughly investigate the increase in the incidence of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in areas where many doses of vaccine were used. NPAFP is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly.”
    Pharmabiz.com continued:

    Quote “The authors noted that while India was polio-free in 2011, in the same year, there were 47500 cases of NPAFP. While data from India’s National Polio Surveillance Project showed NPAFP rate increased in proportion to the number of polio vaccine doses received, independent studies showed that children identified with NPAFP ‘were at more than twice the risk of dying than those with wild polio infection.’” [8]
    The corruption and deceit by these organizations does not stop there.

    The Gates Foundation Blamed for 10,000 Vaccine-Related Deaths
    In 2013, yet another report named the Gates Foundation and GAVI as being responsible for multiple deaths using untested vaccinations on children from the developing world.

    The report, published on the website Occupy Corporatism and written by Susanne Posel stated:

    Quote “It was found out through an investigation, that GAVI was using an untested vaccine; giving this dangerous vaccine to Pakistani children shows the lack of empathy associated with these organizations.

    GAVI was blamed for the deaths of 10,000 children in Pakistan when they came in and administered polio vaccines that resulted in casualties.” [9]
    As we know, GAVI is heavily funded by the Gates Foundation. [10]

    So, what was the name of the organization that investigated GAVI and found them using untested polio vaccinations in Pakistan?

    According to the Express Tribune article, which I referred to earlier in this article, it was none other than the Indian government, who, upon discovering the shocking truth, recommended the immediate suspension of the administration of all types of vaccines funded by GAVI. [7]

    In a recent radio show hosted by Sallie O. Elkordy, Susanne Posel gave her frank and honest views on the whole sorry mess that we find ourselves in today.

    Warning: This report is not for the faint-hearted. [11]

    Conclusion
    It is difficult to believe that, despite the mounting evidence outlining the many crimes against humanity that have been committed by the Gates Foundation, GAVI, UNICEF and PATH, Bill Gates is portrayed as a hero among many.

    However, according to the definition of hero in the Oxford Dictionary, the word hero means:

    Quote “A person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.” [12]
    The dictionary I used said nothing about vaccinating innocent, vulnerable children with untested and unsafe vaccinations, causing them to suffer agonizing, untimely deaths.


    References
    1. http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/bil...rial-in-india/
    2. http://holyhormones.com/womens-health/cancer-womens-health…
    3. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-31…
    4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEBGG7KFQpU
    5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsxSlT_sBRk
    6. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases…
    7. http://tribune.com.pk/story/293191/v...l-polio-shots/
    8. http://pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=68352&sid=1
    9. http://www.occupycorporatism.com/the-shocking-truth-about-syrian-polio-resurgence…
    10. http://www.gavi.org/about/partners/bmgf/
    11. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/publicadvocate…
    12. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us...n_english/hero
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  16. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (8th November 2014), Christine (11th November 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), Jean-Marie (6th October 2014), KiwiElf (6th October 2014), spiritwind (6th October 2014)

  17. Link to Post #29
    Avalon Member peterpam's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th June 2012
    Posts
    1,658
    Thanks
    15,203
    Thanked 8,776 times in 1,589 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Quote Posted by mpennery (here)
    But of course vaccines are causing sterility. Bill Gates himself said that vaccines' purpose is population reduction. Oh, but you thought he meant by making people healthier and that healthier people make more responsible reproductive choices? Uh, no.
    I spent years studying vaccines and now have no need to read another article about them, nor another report about alleged side effects. Once you know the story of their development and their purpose, all else becomes clear. Vaccines are bio-weapons. They are designed to make people sick and to make money. Population reduction is just icing on the cake. They never were designed to eradicate disease (I mean, really!? The medical cartel suppresses every cancer cure that comes along). They never ended polio or smallpox. The mainstream medical marketing is all just a big con on a gullible public, enabled by uneducated medical "professionals" who are unable or unwilling to think for themselves and who care more about their paychecks than "first doing no harm."

    Matt

    Bravo, Matt....beautifully stated!!!!!!!!!!!!

  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to peterpam For This Post:

    avid (8th November 2014), Christine (11th November 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), KiwiElf (6th October 2014), spiritwind (6th October 2014)

  19. Link to Post #30
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    ‘A mass sterilization exercise’: Kenyan doctors find anti-fertility agent in UN tetanus vaccine
    Thu Nov 6, 2014 - 2:29 pm EST

    Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

    According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

    “We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”

    Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”

    But the government says the vaccine is safe. Health Minister James Macharia even told the BBC, “I would recommend my own daughter and wife to take it because I entirely 100% agree with it and have confidence it has no adverse health effects.”

    And Dr. Collins Tabu, head of the Health Ministry’s immunization branch, told the Kenyan Nation, that “there is no other additive in the vaccine other than the tetanus antigen.”

    Tabu said the same vaccine has been used for 30 years in Kenya. Moreover, “there are women who were vaccinated in October 2013 and March this year who are expectant. Therefore we deny that the vaccines are laced with contraceptives.”

    Newspaper stories also report women getting pregnant after being vaccinated.

    Responds Dr. Ngare: “Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’” Dr. Ngare added: “The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.”

    Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

    Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of child-bearing years, and why is it not being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?

    “Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare. “If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.”

    But it is the five-vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.”

    It is HCG that has been found in all six samples sent to the University of Nairobi medical laboratory and another in South Africa. The bishops and doctors warn that injecting women with HCG , which mimics a natural hormone produced by pregnant women, causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get pregnant, and produce their own version of HCG, it triggers the production of antibodies that cause a miscarriage.

    “We knew that the last time this vaccination with five injections has been used was in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994,” said Dr. Ngare. “It didn’t cause miscarriages till three years later,” which is why, he added, the counterclaims that women who got the vaccination recently and then got pregnant are meaningless.

    Ngare said WHO tried to bring the same anti-fertility program into Kenya in the 1990s. “We alerted the government and it stopped the vaccination. But this time they haven’t done so.”

    Ngare also contrasted the secrecy of this campaign with the usual fanfare accompanying national vaccination efforts. “They usually bring all the stakeholders together three months before the campaign, like they did with polio a little while ago. And they use staff in all the centres to give out the vaccine.” But with this anti-tetanus campaign, “only a few operatives from the government are allowed to give it out. They come with a police escort. They take it away with them when they are finished. Why not leave it with the local medical staff to administer?”

    Brian Clowes of Human Life International in Virginia told LifeSite News that WHO was not involved in the Nicaragua, Mexican and Philippines campaigns. “They try to maintain a spotless record. They let organizations like United Nations Population Fund and USAID do the dirty work.”

    In the previous cases, said Clowes, the vaccinators insisted their product was pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for HCG were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process.

    LifeSiteNews has obtained a UN report on an August 1992 meeting at its world headquarters in Geneva of 10 scientists from “Australia, Europe, India and the U.S.A” and 10 “women’s health advocates” from around the world, to discuss the use of “fertility regulating vaccines.” It describes the “anti-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin vaccine” as the most advanced.

    One million Kenyan women and girls have been vaccinated so far with another 1.3 million to go. The vaccination is targeting women, according to the government, in order to inoculate their children in the womb against tetanus as well. The government says 550 children die of tetanus yearly.

    In covering the contest of words the pro-government Nation found plenty of women who had been vaccinated and were now pregnant, even one who was the wife of a former Catholic priest who left the Church to marry. The paper ignored Kenya’s reliance on the Catholic medical system, while setting the bishops’ stand in a questionable historical context of irrational responses “largely based on religious beliefs,” the more recent murder of vaccination teams in Nigeria, and even of CIA conspiracy theories.

    Why would the UN want to suppress the population in developing countries? “Racism,” is Brian Clowes’ first explanation. “Also, the developed countries want to get hold of their natural resources. And lately, there is the whole bogus global warming thing.”

    Dr. Ngare said it was the Catholic Church’s hope that the government could have resolved the matter quietly by testing the vaccine. “But the government has chosen to be combative,” forcing Kenya’s bishops and Catholic doctors to go public.

    WHO’s Kenyan office and several WHO media contacts in Washington, D.C. failed to respond to LifeSiteNews enquiries over a 24-hour period.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (8th November 2014), Christine (11th November 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), karelia (8th November 2014), Sophocles (8th November 2014)

  21. Link to Post #31
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Depopulation vaccine in Kenya and beyond

    Nov 10, 2014 by Jon Rappoport
    NoMoreFakeNews.com

    We have this current claim:

    Quote “Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

    “According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

    “We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”
    Quote “Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”
    (“Mass Sterilization: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-Fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine,” November 8, 2014, by Steve Weatherbe, earth-heal.com)
    You have to understand that every promoted so-called “pandemic” is an extended sales pitch for vaccines.

    And not just a vaccine against the “killer germ” of the moment. We’re talking about a psyop to condition the population to vaccines in general.

    There is much available literature on vaccines used for depopulation experiments. The research is ongoing. Undoubtedly, we only know a fraction of what is happening behind closed laboratory doors.

    Depopulation has several objectives. Along one vector, it is an elite strategy designed to get rid of large numbers of people, in key areas of the world, where local revolutions would interfere with outside corporations staging a complete takeover of fertile land and rich natural resources.

    An astonishing journal paper. November, 1993. FASEB Journal, volume 7, pp.1381-1385. Authors—Stephan Dirnhofer et al. Dirnhofer was a member of the Institute for Biomedical Aging Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

    A quote from the paper:

    Quote “Our study provides insights into possible modes of action of the birth control vaccine promoted by the Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO (World Health Organization).”
    A birth control vaccine?

    Yes.

    A vaccine whose purpose is to achieve non-pregnancy where it ordinarily could occur. This particular vaccine was apparently just one of several anti-fertility vaccines the Task Force was promoting.

    Yes. There is a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines at WHO. This journal paper focuses on a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin B (hCG). There is a heading in the FASEB paper (p.1382) called “Ability of antibodies to neutralize the biological activity of hCG.” The authors are trying to discover whether a state of non-fertility can be achieved by blocking the normal activity of hCG.

    Another journal paper. The British Medical Bulletin, volume 49, 1993. “Contraceptive Vaccines.” The authors—RJ Aitken et al. From the MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

    Quote “Three major approaches to contraceptive vaccine development are being pursued at the present time. The most advanced approach, which has already reached the stage of phase 2 clinical trials, involves the induction of immunity against human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). Vaccines are being engineered … incorporating tetanus or diptheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides … Clinical trials have revealed that such preparations are capable of stimulating the production of anti-hCG antibodies…”
    The authors are talking about creating an immune response against a female hormone. Training a woman’s body to react against one of its own secreted hormones. The authors state, “The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

    Stop the female body from recognizing a state of pregnancy. Get the body to treat the natural hormone hCG as an intruder, a disease agent, and mobilize the forces of the immune system against it. Create a synthetic effect, an engineered effect, by which the mother’s “maternal endocrine system” does not swing into gear when pregnancy occurs. The result? The embryo in the mother is swept away by her next period—since hGC, which signals the existence of the pregnancy and halts menstruation cycles, is now treated as a disease entity.

    The authors put it this way: “In principle, the induction of immunity against hGC should lead to a sequence of normal, or slightly extended, menstrual cycles during which any pregnancies would be terminated…”

    Miscarriage would then be the “normal” state of affairs. These authors leave no doubt about who the target of this vaccine would be:

    Quote “During the next decade the world’s population is set to rise by around 500 million. Moreover, because the rates of population growth in the developing countries of Africa, South America, and Asia will be so much greater than the rest of the world, the distribution of this dramatic population growth will be uneven…”
    Two other vaccine methods are described. They “aim to prevent conception by interfering with the intricate cascade of interactive events that characterize the union of male and female gametes at fertilization.”

    The diptheria and tetanus vaccines would function as a social and political mask—to hide the sterilizing intent, as millions of women in the Third World would receive vaccines they’re told would protect them against infections and disease.

    A letter to a medical journal, The Lancet, p.1222, Volume 339, May 16, 1992. “Cameroon: Vaccination and politics.” Peter Ndumbe and Emmanuel Yenshu, the authors of this letter, report on their efforts to analyze widespread popular resistance to a tetanus vaccine given in the northwest province of Cameroon.

    Two of the reasons women rejected the vaccine: it was given only to “females of childbearing age,” and people heard that a “sterilizing agent” was present in the vaccine.

    The late well-known journalist, Alexander Cockburn, on the op ed page of the LA Times on September 8, 1994, in his piece “Real U.S. Policy in Third World: Sterilization : Disregard the ‘empowerment’ shoe polish–the goal is to keep the natives from breeding,” reviewed the infamous Kissinger-commissioned 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200, “which addressed population issues.”

    Quote “… the true concern of Kissinger analysts [in Memorandum 200] was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the ‘political consequences’ of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability … With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] ‘the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.’”
    In other words, too many people equals disruption for the transnational corporations, who steal nations from those very people.

    Does this remind you of what is happening in West Africa now, re “the Ebola crisis?” Lockdown. Borders sealed. Over the past five years, several vaccine campaigns—and who knows what other vectors for the transmission of toxic elements to the population.

    Cockburn notes that the writers of the Kissinger memo “favored sterilization over food aid.” He goes on to say that “By 1977, Reimart Ravenholt, the director of AID’s [US Agency for International Development] population program, was saying that his agency’s goal was to sterilize one-quarter of the world’s women.”

    There were unconfirmed reports from the Philippines and Mexico that their 1993 tetanus vaccination programs—which were supposedly administered only to women of childbearing age—involved multiple injections.

    Tetanus vaccine protocols indicate that one injection is good for ten years. Therefore, multiple injections would indicate another motive for the vaccinations—such as the anti-fertility effect of hCG planted in the vaccine.

    My inquiries to Philippine officials went unanswered.

    The Population Research Institute, in the November/December 1996 issue of its Review, published a report by David Morrison.

    Morrison stated,
    Quote “Philippine women may have been unwittingly vaccinated against their own children, a recent study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) has indicated.

    “The study tested random samples of a tetanus vaccine for the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone essential to the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy … The PMA’s positive test results indicate that just such an abortifacient may have been administered to Philippine women without their consent.

    “The PMA notified the Philippine Department of Health (PDOH) of these findings in a 16 September letter signed by the researchers and certified by its President. Using an immunological assay developed by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, a three-doctor research panel tested forty-seven vials of tetanus vaccine collected at random from various health centers in Luzon and Mindanao. Nine were found to contain hCG in levels ranging from 0.191680 mIU/ml to 3.046061 mIU/ml. These vaccines, most of which were labeled as of Canadian origin, were supplied by the World Health Organization as part of a WHO-sponsored [sterilization] vaccination program.”
    Morrison’s article would seem to indicate that the vials of vaccine tested came from a widespread immunization campaign rather than from a small pilot study of a few women.

    The Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation was created at the World Health Organization in 1973. Ute Sprenger, writing in Biotechnology and Development Monitor (December 1995) describes the Task Force:

    Quote “…a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D…such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG.”
    Sprenger indicates that, as of 1995, there were several large groups researching these vaccines. Among them:

    * WHO/HRP. HRP is the Special Progamme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, located in Switzerland. It is funded by “the governments of Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Germany and Canada, as well as the UNFPA and the World Bank.”

    * The Population Council. It’s a US group funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institutes of Health [a US federal agency], and the US Agency for International Development [notorious for its collaborations with the CIA].

    * National Institute of Immunology. Located in India, “major funders are the Indian government, the Canadian International Development Research Center and the [ubiquitous] Rockefeller Foundation.”

    * The Center for Population Research, located at the US National Institute of Child Health and Development [!], which is part of the US National Institutes of Health.

    The Lancet, 4 June, 1998, p.1272:
    Quote “During the recent National Immunisation Campaign (vaccination for childhood diseases and tetanus toxoid for pregnant women), in some villages [of Thailand] the women escaped and hid in the bushes thinking that they were going to be given injections to stop them having children.”

    AP, Boston Globe, October 10, 1992, “Birth-control vaccine is reported in India”: “Scientists said yesterday they have created the first birth-control shot for women, effective for an entire year…[after which] a booster shot is needed.”
    There are other citations from published medical literature—but you get the idea: vaccines as depopulation instruments.

    And the hCG versions I refer to appear to be crude efforts. Who knows what levels of sophistication have been achieved in secret?

    West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu, Ebola—the real motive for promoting these “pandemics” is the follow-up: vaccines.

    To a highly significant degree, the CDC and the World Health Organization are PR agencies, whose job is to convince the public that stepping up, rolling up their sleeves, and submitting to shots containing germs and toxic chemicals is the most natural and wise action possible.

    Yes, and ignorance is strength.

    The Matrix is designed inside out and upside down.

    Jon Rappoport
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (11th November 2014), Christine (11th November 2014), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015)

  23. Link to Post #32
    Avalon Member avid's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Location
    NW UK
    Posts
    2,229
    Thanks
    28,788
    Thanked 9,450 times in 1,999 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    The moral of this is.... give vaccines a miss! Posted previously elsewhere, but need to replicate the warning:
    http://henrymakow.com/2014/11/Ebola-...ccination.html
    Terrible side-effects since the 1860's of 'vaccines', actually promoting the disease!
    For our children's sake - stop vaccinating, and eat healthily. Stuff the Big Pharma hype - they will scare us and try to poison us, but stay focussed on healthy eating, clean habits.
    By all means - go to the doctor/emergency unit if there is a crisis.
    Try to keep a balanced viewpoint - Avid
    The love you withhold is the pain that you carry
    and er..
    "Chariots of the Globs" (apols to Fat Freddy's Cat)

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to avid For This Post:

    DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015)

  25. Link to Post #33
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Must read! One parent who had enough - Vaccines: Medical ignorance and deceit

    Trina Ricketts The Liberty Beacon
    Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:23 CET




    In British Columbia (Canada), school nurses deliberately track down youth aged 14 and up who have consent forms from the their parents marked "NO" to all vaccines and attempt to persuade those children to get vaccinated under "mature consent" laws that state children over the age of 14 may make their own decisions about medical interventions. A number of my friends' children were coerce into vaccines against their parents' wishes and one parent in particular has taken his case to the BC Civil Liberties Association.

    When vaccination day approached for my 14-year-old daughter, I wanted to keep her home from school. Knowing that many parents relent to vaccinating their children despite their original intention to refuse because they are bullied into it by nurses or doctors, I can easily imagine how hard it must be for children to refuse in the face of such pressure.

    I planned to keep my daughter home from school on vaccination day, but the shots took place during her favorite classes and she didn't want to miss them. I coached my daughter on what to say and do if anyone tried to force her to take the shots. I also sent a letter requesting non-vaccination.In my letter, I informed the vaccine-pushers that I would take it to the courts and the media if my daughter was coerced into getting vaccinated.

    To my surprise, the Medical Health Officer for my local health authority responded to my letter. It was the usual propaganda with a dash of condescension and a wallop of complete ignorance. I could not help it. I decided to respond...

    Quote November 19, 2014

    Medical Health Officer,

    I had not expected a reply to my letter, but since you took the time to do so, I thought it would only be polite to respond to you as well. You encouraged me to contact you if I had any questions or concerns.

    I have a number of concerns about vaccines in general and I am especially concerned about nurses identifying unvaccinated children and targeting their efforts towards these children against their parents' wishes. I will enumerate my questions and ask that you please provide answers, including evidence (or sources listed) proving any claims you make in your responses to me.

    My first group of questions involve "informed consent." May I ask:

    *What is the procedure for "informing" the child of the benefits and risks associated with the vaccines you are administering?

    *Do you provide the vaccine insert and go over the ingredients in each vaccine, their known toxicity, and why those ingredients are necessary?

    *Do you inform the child of the risk of getting the disease in question?

    *Do you tell the child what the risk of death is if she or he acquires the disease?

    *Do you explain the symptoms of the disease, so that the child can decide whether to take chances with the vaccine or the disease?

    *Do you list the potential adverse reactions which are included in the vaccine insert that comes with the vaccine?

    *Do you ask if the child has any family members who have had adverse reactions to vaccines?

    *Do you provide children who arrive with consent forms from their parents saying "yes" to the recommended vaccines with informed consent? Do you tell them that they have a right to refuse the vaccine despite their parents' wishes? Do you explain all the risks/benefits and information I detailed above to these children?

    If you do not do all of these things prior to giving vaccinations to people, especially children, then you do not obtain "informed consent."

    My next group of questions involve evidence. You say in your letter that "immunization is an important and effective public health measure in protecting individuals and the community against vaccine preventable diseases."

    *Please provide evidence showing this statement to be true by sending me copies of the studies or name sources for studies that I can view independently that prove vaccines are safe and effective. These studies should show causation, not correlation.For instance, if a disease disappeared around the same time that a vaccine was introduced, please include dates, a graph showing the correlation of decline and why it is considered causative proof.

    *Please name the source studies that resulted in Fraser Health changing the number of HPV shots given to girls. I received a letter saying that "recent studies" have indicated that girls do not need more than two HPV shots anymore. I would like to know what in those studies prompted this decision.

    *Please provide proof that the HPV vaccine prevents cancer.

    *Please advise me of any studies showing the health differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

    *Please advise me how much training nurses receive about vaccines prior to administering them or going through the "mature consent" steps you outlined in your letter.

    *You mention in your letter that nurses "obtain screens for specific contraindications to the vaccine." How is this accomplished? What does this mean?

    *Regarding evidencelease be advised that I do not accept studies wherein the control group are given aluminum or other vaccines as a "placebo." Using toxic substances as a "placebo" in a control group is not ethical science. Comparing people injected with vaccines with people injected with the ingredients of vaccines is junk science.

    Regarding the following steps you outline in your letter for obtaining "mature consent" as listed here:

    *Informing a child that he or she can get immunized against the parents' wishes;

    *Assessing the capability of the person to provide consent;

    *Providing "standard information;"

    *Giving time for questions and answers;

    *And assuring the child he or she can refuse or revoke consent.

    I have the following questions:

    *What specifically do you consider to be "standard information;" in other words, what information do you provide?

    *How does a nurse "assess the capability of the person providing consent?" Is she trained in psychological assessment? If the "assessment" takes place in a matter of minutes, how can it be considered reliable?

    In conclusion, I would like to share a little story about "informed consent."

    Recently, I was advised by a doctor to get a tetanus vaccine. He told me that there was a very strong risk of me dying if I did not receive the vaccine prior to my procedure. He also told me that tetanus is a bacteria that originates inside the stomach which can cause death if a person is not vaccinated against it. Here is what I know about the tetanus vaccine that this doctor did not know:

    *The bacteria that cause tetanus, Clostridium tetani, are found in soil, dust and animal feces. Not our stomachs.

    *In 2009 there were 19 tetanus cases reported (mostly in adults over 65) with two related deaths.

    *As of August 2012, there had been 22,143 adverse events in children and adults reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following tetanus or tetanus containing vaccines combined with diphtheria vaccine (TT, TD, DT) and 67 deaths.

    *In 1994 the Institute of Medicine concluded that there is compelling scientific evidence to conclude that tetanus, DT and Td vaccines can cause Guillain-Barre syndrome including death; brachial neuritis; and death from anaphylaxis (shock).

    *I refused the vaccine despite the doctor's attempts to persuade me with false information. I had the procedure done. I did not get tetanus. I did not die.

    I have spent many hours researching vaccines, reading the studies, and learning about the risks of vaccines vs. the diseases they are purported to prevent. In contrast, I find that most health professionals know very little about vaccines except to say that they are safe and effective because that is what their textbooks said.

    I am aware of the danger for health professionals who refuse to comply with standard vaccine rhetoric. They risk losing their licenses, being fired, and otherwise being excluded or shamed (wearing masks) for choosing to exercise their health freedom rights. While I empathize with those in your profession, I cannot condone the practice of targeting children and persuading them to get vaccinated against their parents' wishes. These nurses have very little knowledge about the risks of vaccines, nor do they truly inform the child of the potential side effects or risks associated with vaccines. The HPV vaccine, in particular, has caused ovarian failure, infertility, disability and death in many children worldwide. Many countries are withdrawing the HPV vaccine from their vaccine programs. Do you tell each child this? Do you tell the parents this? If not, then you omit information that would ensure true "informed consent."

    My hope is that I have raised questions in your mind about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines; that you will realize the hypocrisy of a medical establishment that vows to "First do no harm," yet denies any harm done when a person is vaccine-injured. We have low stats of vaccine injuries because doctors refuse to admit when they occur. Even with our low stats, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) shows a small snapshot of the astronomical number of people who are vaccine-injured daily. Vaccines can and do cause harm. Denying this truth is a disservice and it destroys lives.

    People deserve to be truly informed when making decisions about their health. And their decisions should be respected.

    I look forward to your response and the research proving your claims. Please respond by mail.

    Sincerely,

    Trina Ricketts


    SOTT Comment:


    For more information, see Gardasil: Medical torture and child abuse by Big Pharma:
    Quote
    There is something deeply wrong with a giant pharmaceutical company spending hundreds of millions of dollars to manipulate women and influence legislation in order to generate a revenue stream of billions of dollars a year for itself at the expense of a gullible public. Because what is wrong with Gardasil isn't just that it is unnecessary. Gardasil is possibly the most dangerous vaccine on the market, with the potential to injure, maim, or even kill the children who receive it.
    To all parents being asked to vaccinate their daughters - or even sons - with Gardasil, Tracy has this to say: "Please do your homework. Please educate yourself about the risks of this vaccine. The risk of cervical cancer is so low and the success of regular Pap testing has been so great that there really is no need for this vaccine at all. There is no going back once your child has brain damage.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015)

  27. Link to Post #34
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Tens of thousands of teen girls suffer serious illnesses after HPV cervical cancer jab

    By Oli Smith PUBLISHED: 12:03, Mon, Jun 1, 2015 | UPDATED: 12:19, Mon, Jun 1, 2015


    GETTY

    TENS of thousands of teenage girls have fallen seriously ill and even been left wheelchair-bound after taking the routine cervical cancer vaccination.

    The HPV jab has been routinely given to 12-year-old and 13-year-old girls since 2008The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency announced that 8,228 young girls had suffered debilitating side effects from the HPV injection.

    However, the number is estimated to be only ten per cent of the true number of teens struck down with severe side effects after taking the vaccine.

    The jab has been routinely administered to 12-year-old and 13-year-old girls in Britain since 2008. The injection blocks the sexually transmitted human papilloma virus which leads to most cervical cancer cases.

    Otherwise healthy school-aged girls have reportedly suffered chest and abdominal pains, exhaustion, breathing difficulties, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, which triggers an abnormally high heart rate, and fibromyalgia, which causes chronic pain throughout the body.

    In more than a quarter of the cases, the effects have apparently been so severe that they were considered 'life-threatening' and required immediate medical treatment.

    The concern over the injection is not new.

    The Japanese health ministry has previously warned against the vaccination while European countries are continuing to re-evaluate its use.

    Previously, links with infertility and early menopause have also been explored.

    More than eight million people in the UK have been given the vaccination despite the ongoing links with grave conditions.

    Jackie Fletcher, of the pressure group Jabs, said: "Previously fit and healthy young girls have developed seizures or viral fatigue, some have lost the ability to walk. And years on, some have still not recovered."


    GETTY

    Cervical cancer kills nearly a thousand women every yearIn a recent article in the Clinical Rheumatology journal Dr Martinez-Lavin wrote that although the HPV injection has been 'one of the most effective public health measures in the history of medicine', the level of side effects reported compared to other routine vaccinations is a growing concern.

    In fact, the total number of illnesses associated with the HPV jab tops the number of side-effects reported in all other routine health programmes combined.

    In light of their own report, the UK's MHRA has continued to claim that there were no 'major safety concerns' associated with the jab.

    The watchdog insisted that the vaccine can save nearly half of the 1,000 women who die from the killer disease every year. It is the second most common cancer afflicting women under-35.

    The agency maintains that the link with serious illnesses remains unproven while NHS asserts that the HPV vaccination programme has proven 'very effective'.
    SOTT Comment: Considering all the information available and the extent of the scientific negligence, the HPV vaccine does seem to qualify as torture:
    Quote "Medical care that causes severe suffering for no justifiable reason can be considered cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and if there is State involvement and specific intent, it is torture." [ United Nation's 2013 Report by the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment]
    Doctors, lawyers and people in general should keep this in mind.

    Not convinced? Check out:
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Aspen (9th June 2015), DNA (18th November 2018), fourty-two (9th June 2015), Jean-Marie (8th June 2015)

  29. Link to Post #35
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Gardasil Firestorm in Denmark

    By Norma Erickson, Tuesday, June 23, 2015



    In March 2015, a Danish national television station (TV2) aired a documentary focusing on girls who suspected they had been injured by the HPV vaccine Gardasil. Immediately after the airing of the show, girls with similar experiences started coming out of the woodwork. Virtually all of the girls had the same story to tell.

    They began to have serious new medical conditions shortly after using Gardasil, so they would go to the doctor. According to Luise Juellund, the vast majority of doctors would tell them the HPV vaccine has no serious side effects and offer psychological problems as an alternative reason for the new symptoms.

    Luise should know, her daughter is one of the seriously injured and cannot be left home alone because of daily seizures and hour-long periods of unconsciousness. After disclosing the new symptoms she was experiencing after Gardasil, she was referred for psychological evaluation. Psychiatrists cleared her and she has now been diagnosed with POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) a suspected side effect of HPV vaccines.

    According to Peter la Cour, Head of the Center for Functional Disorders in Copenhagen, the practice of refusing girls the opportunity for medical examination and treatment on the grounds that psychological problems can cause similar symptoms is terrible. He states:
    Quote The handful of girls I’ve seen has not been mentally ill, but very physically sick and disabled. We simply cannot have sick people rejected under the assumption that they are mentally ill. None of us know anything about why they are so sick. Alleged knowledge of psychological reasons is scandalous character assassination of the young women.
    Serious Adverse Reactions Reach One in 500

    Denmark is divided into five healthcare regions. On June 1, the government established a single point of entrance in each one of these regions to accept and examine anyone suspected of having a negative reaction to Gardasil. The response was overwhelming.

    The influx of girls seeking care was 60% higher than expected, suggesting the harmful effects was greater than Danish health authorities had foreseen. By June 9th, the waiting list to be evaluated was at least six to nine months long. (See map below.) Two of the five centers did not know how long the girls would have to wait.

    Jesper Mehlsen from Synkopecenteret at Frederiksberg Hospital is one of the specialists who takes care of the girls. He stated:
    Quote We thought it (the serious adverse event rate) was about one in 10,000 people who had side effects. Now it turns out that there are at least two per 10 000. Suddenly it was doubled.

    Unfortunately, the avalanche of girls seeking medical diagnoses and treatment after their HPV vaccinations continued to increase.

    Only two days later, on June 11th, Dr. Jesper Mehlsen had to revise his estimate of the number of injured girls stating:
    Quote A realistic estimate is that one in 500 girls – or 1,000 of the 500,000 vaccinated experience serious side effects.
    Dr. Mehlsen helped to research the HPV vaccine and personally vaccinated 3,000 girls. Now, he operates the regional intake center in Frederiksberg and will be in charge of coordinating work across the country. He noted that as of June 11th, 360 girls had been referred for study.

    Dr. Stig Gerdes fears this is only the tip of the iceberg. He stated:
    Quote It will not it surprise me if we end up reaching several thousand who have been sick. I even stopped administering Gardasil a few years ago, after vaccinating about 100 patients.
    More than a handful of them became ill after the vaccine. Several of them very, very seriously and completely devastated.

    Is HPV vaccine safety based on mere guesswork?

    Danish Health Minister, Nick Haekkerup, and the National Board of Health continue to defend the use of the HPV vaccine Gardasil despite the more than 600 young girls suspected of becoming seriously ill from the vaccine. Both still claim the vaccine is safe and the benefits outweigh the risks.

    Experts who are working with the injured girls disagree. Coordinator of the Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology’s national guidelines for HPV vaccination, Gynecologist Jeppe Schroll states:
    Quote We can simply not say because we do not know. There is so much uncertainty in the studies that were made on the vaccine – so it is a pure guess. It may well be that they (the health authorities) are right, but it could just as well be the opposite.
    His opinion is reinforced by Dr. Diane Harper, who helped develop Gardasil for Merck and stated:
    Quote There is no data to substantiate that the benefits outweigh the risks. The truth is that we know very little about the side effects of the HPV vaccine.
    Dr. Schroll suggests that Merck’s own analysis of possible serious side effects is based on a questionnaire which clinical trial participants completed two weeks after the vaccine was given. In the years since, women are asked whether they have received "new medical conditions."

    According to Dr. Schroll, this provides a high degree of uncertainty. Some may get sick during the first 14 days, but women who become ill later may not connect it to the vaccine.

    Dr. Schroll stated another source of error is that in the last major Danish/Swedish study among a million girls only looked at those with a diagnosis; not necessarily those with a list of symptoms such as debilitating paralysis of the arms and legs, pain, chronic fatigue, sudden daily fainting, daily migraines and dizziness – like the more than 600 Danish girls currently referred for evaluation.

    According to Dr. Jeppe Schroll:
    Quote I think the reason why they have not found the side effects in the studies is that they have not been looking for them.
    Experts weigh in on HPV vaccination policy

    Danish GP’s believe one should examine the many sick girls who are suspected to have had adverse reactions to Gardasil before even considering implementing Gardasil 9.

    Deputy Chairman of the PLO and member of the Board of Health’s vaccination committee, Niels Urich Holm agrees, stating:
    Quote We know too little about the side effects. We fear first, that it (Gardasil 9) might have more side effects than the current one (Gardasil), which has greater side effects than other vaccines. And secondly, we believe that it would be prudent to await the investigations currently going on in all regions to find out about the disease and symptoms we have seen in a number of girls, maybe caused by the vaccine. Therefore, one should wait to introduce the new HPV vaccine, which is being approved for use in Denmark until the five new regional HPV centers have studied the sick girls who received the current vaccine properly.
    SF (Socialist People’s Party) spokesperson Ozlem Cekic also backed up the GP’s request that the cautionary principle be applied when she stated:
    Quote I do not understand why the National Board of Health is so eager to launch a new HPV vaccine. I think overall that the Agency has behaved foolishly in this case, where they have been too slow to react. We can see that many girls may have become ill by severe side effects. It shall be fully investigated.
    She also stated that the Socialist People’s Party will take HPV vaccine issues up politically after the election and shall require deeper insight into the documentation underlying the vaccine.

    Health Rapporteur Liselott Blixt of the Danish People’s Party was one of the people who led the effort to get the HPV vaccine Gardasil introduced in Denmark in 2008. She now wants it abolished. She states:
    Quote The fact that we have so many, perhaps up to 5,000 young women who suddenly become so sick must have the consequence that we simply stop the vaccine. I was the first who said a big ‘yes’ to it, but now I will also be the first to abolish it, because we politicians must take responsibility for ensuring that we have adopted it. Not least in light of the fact that we do not actually have any treatment options to offer the most sick.
    Let’s hope the authorities in Denmark follow expert advice and make sure that young women’s health is no longer sacrificed for the promise of a benefit fifteen to twenty years from now.

    No healthy young woman should have to sacrifice her health to see if a cancer prevention experiment will work!

    Sources:

    Norma Erickson is the President of SaneVax Inc., where this article first appeared.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Curious77 (15th April 2016), DNA (18th November 2018), Flash (1st July 2015), Muzz (1st July 2015)

  31. Link to Post #36
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,562
    Thanks
    37,831
    Thanked 52,743 times in 8,858 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    bumping

    This is important for parents.

    Here, when I refused the HPV vaccine for my daughter at the health clinic, the nurse inquired if she had all the other vaccines (to my shameful ignorant parent I was then, I had my daughter vaccinated), I said yes, but not this one.

    There was zero argument, zero zero. The nurses knew that vaccine was not tested and could be dangerous. They did not tell, but did not even proposed a second time.

  32. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Hervé (1st July 2015)

  33. Link to Post #37
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Deal Reached: Wireless Remote Drug-Releasing Microchip Implants On The Assembly Line

    By Heather Callaghan, Tuesday, June 30, 2015



    A pharma company with generic drugs meets michrochip and biotech in a marriage of implantable devices that are shockingly close to the finish line of commercialization.

    Deals were made. Money exchanged. Development in process - this is actually going to happen.

    Is this the next phase of The Singularity? The complete bypassing of pills, injections - things that one actively chooses and takes - to a passive acceptance of remote controlled wireless chips quietly and somehow pumping substance for up to 16 years? Or is it more public relations for the long-time push for the coming ''brain chip''?

    But first to roll out will probably be the wirelessly controlled birth-control implanted device backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

    Rob Matheson of TechSwarm reports:
    Quote
    ...Earlier this month, MIT spinout Microchips Biotech partnered with a pharmaceutical giant to commercialize its wirelessly controlled, implantable, microchip-based devices that store and release drugs inside the body over many years.
    Invented by Microchips Biotech co-founders Michael Cima, the David H. Koch Professor of Engineering, and Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor, the microchips consist of hundreds of pinhead-sized reservoirs, each capped with a metal membrane, that store tiny doses of therapeutics or chemicals. An electric current delivered by the device removes the membrane, releasing a single dose...
    [...]
    Now Microchips Biotech will begin co-developing microchips with Teva Pharmaceutical, the world’s largest producer of generic drugs, to treat specific diseases, with licensing potential for other products. Teva paid $35 million up front, with additional milestone payments as the device goes through clinical trials before it hits the shelves.
    Langer was apparently inspired in the 1990s by microchip manufacturing to make a new drug delivery system. Cima, a chip-making expert had said, "...being out-of-this-world is not something that needs to stop anybody at MIT - In fact, that should be the criterion." Cima recalls the early trial-and-error process saying, “We were trying to find the killer application. We thought, ‘I have a hammer, what’s the right nail to hit?’” Human trials for the wireless capabilities actually took place in 2011 - then Gates got involved.

    The Techswarm report goes on:
    Quote Apart from providing convenience, Microchips Biotech says these microchips could also improve medication-prescription adherence — a surprisingly costly issue in the United States.
    Do you hear that? Non-adherence won't be tolerated because someone or something else will be calling the shots, so to speak... According to a supportive report by the Annals of Internal Medicine, the estimated unnecessary health costs of people who don't stick to their meds is up to $100 billion to $289 billion annually.

    Incidentally, that report goes on to say that a failure to follow prescriptions causes around 125,000 deaths annually and up to 10 percent of all hospitalizations. Is that on top of the 200,000 or so annual deaths caused by FDA-approved prescription drugs and more from the 200,000 - 400,000 annual deaths from medical mistakes at the hospital? (source)

    Then we have the kicker - the first device likely to roll out:
    Quote
    While its first partnership is for treating chronic diseases, Microchips Biotech will continue work on its flagship product, a birth-control microchip, backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, that releases contraceptives and can be turned on and off wirelessly.
    Cima, who now serves on the Microchips Biotech board of directors with Langer, sees this hormone-releasing microchip as one of the first implantable “artificial organs” — because it acts as a gland. “A lot of the therapies are trying to chemically trick the endocrine systems,” Cima says. “We are doing that with this artificial organ we created.”
    Do I really need to point out that it might not be a good idea to allow an organization that strives for depopulation to remote control women's decision whether or not they can conceive? Listen to the proud men who would be gods - it's been a long time dream of upper-echelon scientists to replace and "improve" the glandular system. It began with attempts to sew animal parts into human glands in the early 20th century, funded by Big Oil. Isn't it coincidental that one of the biggest health crises facing Americans is glandular dysfunction - including infertility?

    Also, is this not an all too real metaphor for alchemy? Gold alloy for "this artificial organ we created"?

    In December, I wrote about "Injectable 3D Vaccines With Programmable Particles Anticipated for Future Epidemics," along the same lines. Previously, Brandon Turbeville reported on Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation work with developing "on demand" nano vaccines using genetically engineered proteins.

    So there we have it, three or so avenues with which the "new medicine order" will be rolling out devices that mesh us with nanotech, biotech and wireless tech all in one. Who needs individuality and choice when one can let someone else take the medical wheel - from some remote location...

    Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com and ActivistPost.com. Like at Facebook.


    Recent posts by Heather Callaghan:
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  34. The Following User Says Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Flash (1st July 2015)

  35. Link to Post #38
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Probably submitted without any trace of a blink...

    Proposal to temporarily sterilise all NZ teenage females should raise serious red flags

    Leading EdgeJuly 1, 2015
    (Photo: Kyrre Gjerstad)

    Yesterday the NZ media featured coverage of a new proposal that has been put forward by two “senior” academics from the University of Otago, who would like to see all young New Zealand females temporarily sterilised with long-acting chemical contraceptive implants.

    In their ideal vision for the future of New Zealand young people, these academics would like temporary sterilisation to be the default policy that young girls would have to deliberately be opted out of if they didn’t want their new and still-developing fertility to be chemically shut down for months or years at a time.

    No, this is not the plot of some dystopian novel or film, this really is a policy that a couple of NZ academics apparently now seriously consider to be a good idea.

    To put things mildly: there is a lot to be concerned about with this proposal.

    Firstly, these academics don’t seemed to have considered the possible impacts that temporarily sterilising an entire population of females from a very young age could have.

    As far as I am aware, no attempt at the population-wide temporary sterilisation of very young females, whose physiology is still new and still developing, has ever been attempted – meaning that the outcome of such an experimental scheme is totally unknown.

    We are talking here about synthetic hormonal interference with the female fertility system while that system is still very young and developing, and there is no reliable way of knowing how such interference could turn out (for all of us) in the long-run.

    We already know that chemical contraceptives are an environmental pollutant that end up in waterways, and from there cause harms to wildlife populations. Imagine how devastating this environmental impact could become if every female in NZ was temporarily sterilised with these agents at a young age?

    Then there are the eugenic memories from recent history that make mass sterilisation (even if it is reversible) a very unpalatable idea for most people today – the Nazis experimented with ways of trying to sterilise entire female Jewish populations, and in Apartheid South-Africa a similar sterilisation scheme was attempted on Black Africans.

    Then there were the forced sterilisations of those considered to be ‘defective’ that took place in the United States of America prior to, and after World War II – not to mention those that took place in other parts of the world as well last century.

    I think people are right to be extremely wary of any attempt to introduce any sort of mass sterilisation programmes – even temporary chemical sterilisations – because these can very easily morph into state-mandated sterilisation programmes for economic or social reasons (the old saying: ‘absolute power corrupts absolutely’ is still as true today as it was the day when it was first uttered.)

    And none of this even touches on the negative impact that synthetic hormonal contraceptives can have on female health and wellbeing, or the fact that such a scheme would not actually do anything to alleviate the far more serious problem of sexually transmitted diseases.

    (By the way, I hoped everyone took notice of the fact that these academics have rightly pointed out that condoms have a failure rate of 18% per annum (that’s 18 pregnancies per year, for every 100 couples using condoms) – which makes condoms only 4% more effective than the woefully unreliable withdrawal method! This is important, because pregnancy can only occur for a very limited window each month (due to the way that female fertility works). Sexually transmitted diseases, on the other hand, can be transmitted 24/7 – meaning that condoms are a far less reliable form of protection against sexual disease than some people wrongly believe and tout them to be.)

    I think that most people are rightly very concerned by this proposal for the automatic temporary sterilisation of all young New Zealand females – and for lots of very good reasons.

    For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against – like we would a disease, or some other physiological problem.

    At the end of the day, this proposal would actually create far more social problems, and expose us to far more risks and unknown factors than we are currently experiencing in this country – which is precisely why I think that it is one of the worst health policy proposals that has been mooted in this country in quite some time.


    - See more at: http://theleadingedgeblog.com/steril....Y66hGUlc.dpuf
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Sstarss (12th July 2015)

  37. Link to Post #39
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,744
    Thanks
    60,044
    Thanked 94,789 times in 15,454 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    Bill Gates' Temporary Sterilization Microchip In Beta Female Testing By End of Year



    "Her-RA for the Brave New World!" By Heather Callaghan

    Earlier this week, I wrote about a deal reached that would soon be pumping out medical microchip implants. Meet the new face of medicine that polygamously marries Big Pharma, biotech, nanotech and wireless remote technology. Maybe hooking oneself into the Internet of Things will be an additional app, although this sounds like a passive form of medicine where someone else gets to call the shots, so to speak.

    The same developers who are bringing wireless remotely controlled microchip implants are actually focusing on their first flagship product: Gates Foundation-funded birth-control microchip implants. Wireless technology allows the remotely controlled chip to turn a woman's ability to conceive off or on at will - temporary sterilization. Of course with remote technology funded by eugenics depopulation fanatics, the first questions should always be, "the ability to conceive by whose will?" This would be the complete antithesis of female empowerment or a "woman's right to choose" - would it not?

    The encryption is alleged to be so safe, that cyberhackers cannot break entry - that means you too.

    The chip can be implanted into the hip, arms or beneath the back. Mum was the word during the last few years of development until it was finally publicly confirmed that the beta testing for the birth control chip would be starting towards the end of this year. Indeed, human volunteers will be sought for real-life chip testing.

    TWCN Tech News reports more details on the microchip birth-control implant:
    Quote The birth control chip is the brain child of a professor, Robert Langer, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bill Gates and Melinda foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing. The chips will be ready for sale by the year 2018 according to Robert Langer. The institute’s Chip Foundation and Bill Gates’ foundation have been working on the birth control chip for past three years.

    The chip’s size is 20mm by 20mm by 7mm. The reservoirs of hormones would be stored on a microchip of 1.5cm. The chip’s data would always be encrypted so that others (cybercriminals or hackers) cannot access the information contained in the chip or misuse/alter or destroy it.

    [...]

    The release of hormones will be done by melting a part of solid hormonal stock using a small electric shock which won’t be noticed by humans.

    [...]

    The safety tests would begin by the end of year 2015 and Robert Langer is confident that the chips will hit market sometime in 2018.
    As usual, "The main target" for the testing phase of the chips are women in third-world countries. That means African and Indian women will be human guinea pigs, subject to more of Gates' destructive horrors, like paralyzing nearly 50,000 Indian children with his polio vaccine tests. Or deaths/paralysis in Pakistan and more paralysis in Africa. But, I'm sure they will go back and make sure those women can conceive again, right? No one is admitting who is actually in control of the wireless capabilities of the implant that is allegedly impenetrable by hackers. Who does a woman see to have her ability to conceive turned back on? That would be an important piece of information, correct?

    Interestingly, this news came right on the heels of New Zealand academic higher-ups seriously suggesting the temporary sterilization of all young teen girls - at least in New Zealand.

    Brave New World much?

    Headlines were simply calling it "free contraception" and recommending the temporary chemical shutting off of young female fertility for society's sake. No thought whatsoever to looking to solve the source of "the problem" if it even should be looked at so harshly, or to the health of developing teen girls. And just like Gates' moves in India, no real thoughts go to solving issues of impoverishment which historically, lead to blooming birth rates and medical birth issues. Why better people's lives when there is so much control in remotely and wirelessly deciding if a woman can conceive?

    Pregnancy costs too much....it's inconvenient...it's bad for mother and child, and other dehumanizing reasons were given. Ethics, compulsory slippery slopes and STD concerns aside, critics zeroed in on health and environment concerns regarding chemicals. Isn't it convenient that Gates' birth-control microchip should launch to save the world from those critiques? Who needs artificial hormones when wireless voltage and gold are there to alchemically or A.I.-chemically create "an artificial organ" through biotech, according to one of its developers. This is where Woman meets Machine to reproduce. Now there is no reason to protest - temporary sterilization for all!

    How is that for female empowerment? It requires permission...

    This writer's sentiments align with the anti-eugenics op-ed piece by Leading Edge, that said:
    Quote For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against – like we would a disease, or some other physiological problem.
    Indeed, is the human body really worth altering to the point of switching on and off like it's an inconvenient afterthought? Why go against who you are - you are not a disease. At least you deserve to be thought of as a glorious human being, and not something to be eradicated. Worse yet, why let someone else take the wheel from a remote location?

    Image by Heather Callaghan

    Heather Callaghan is an independent researcher, natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com and ActivistPost.com. Like at Facebook.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  38. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    onawah (11th February 2016), Sstarss (12th July 2015)

  39. Link to Post #40
    United States Avalon Member idiit's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd March 2015
    Age
    65
    Posts
    679
    Thanks
    660
    Thanked 2,189 times in 572 posts

    Default Re: Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species

    me ( idiit ) be a guy. me (idiit) just viewed a recent Leuren Moret: How to avoid Jesuits, U.S. & Russian mind control from turning America into a NWO prison video. me love leuren moret (Berkley graduate) now. leuren moret discusses agenda 21, war on the female species, genocide programs targeting minorities, Jesuit control power system and more.

    you watch video linked below. it's the best. end of story. leuren moret is an alpha female in her primal glory. you watch.

    ok, leuren moret gives the best bird's eye, superior vantage point perspective I've seen detailing the true hidden nwo power structure.

    if you want "the juice", the real deal "raw dope" you gotta take the time to watch this video done with Alfred webre at exopolitics.

    I posted the below link and intro. on this thread 'cause it's the first appropriate thread I could find that is currently getting posts.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bWcYoUZeWM

    you females ( and a few truly liberated guys) give idiiit lots of thank you's after viewing the best interview you have had the recent pleasure of viewing.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts