Cancer Act 1939

[lake]

As far as I have found....cancer was understood and in effect cured by Dr Otto Warburg in 1931 when he won the noble prize in medicine, "for his discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme".

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_priz...aureates/1931/

All after this would only seem, to me, to reflect his work.
What he said was that cancer can not exist within an alkaline oxygen rich environment....that to exist, cancer requires to ferment sugars.

Snip from a speech ge gave in 1966

In any case, during the cancer development the oxygen - respiration always falls, fermentation appears, and the highly differentiated cells are transformed to fermenting anaerobes, which have lost all their body functions and retain only the now useless property of growth. Thus, when respiration disappears, life does not disappear, but the meaning of life disappears, and what remains are growing machines that destroy the body in which they grow.

http://ionizers.org/Otto-Warburg.html

So cancer is the body's last attempt at continuing 'life'....a natural desperate act.......because of the acidosis 'forced' upon it.

Now I have basically given up on trying to impart information to those around me regarding cancer as they either 'go blank' or direct their anger....at me for being a liar!
But I did not know that by 'speaking' to others regarding alternative (read true) cures for cancer, I was breaking a UK law (although it is not a law, it is an act, given the force of law by consent)

Cancer Act of 1939

The full thing is here:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/2-3/13/enacted

It says two things....the National Radium Trust will be lent money and to prohibit certain advertisements relating to cancer....... I have only taken snips showing that even the use of 'sounds' to tell others about the real cause and cure of cancer....is illegal?

4. Prohibition of certain advertisements
(1)No person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement—

(a)containing an offer to treat any person for cancer, or to prescribe any remedy therefor, or to give any advice in connection with the treatment thereof; or

(b)referring to any article, or articles of any description, in terms which are calculated to lead to the use of that article, or articles of that description, in the treatment of cancer.

(8)In this section the expression " advertisement " includes any notice, circular, label, wrapper or other document, and any announcement made orally or by any means of producing or transmitting sounds.

This 'law' has been used recently:
http://community.wddty.com/blogs/adv...n-the-Act.aspx
http://www.cancertreatment.net/news/...ncer-treatment

The National Radium Trust was formed in 1929

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_radium_trust

And was abolished with the introduction of the NHS in 1948

http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/thenhs/...story1948.aspx

so the NHS is just a continuation of a want to use radiation on humans!

The Radium Trust was granted a supplementary charter in 1939, granting it power to purchase in addition to radium, other radioactive substances and apparatus and appliances required for radiotherapeutic treatment, and the Radium Commission was instructed to make arrangements for the custody, distribution and use of radioactive substances and apparatus and appliances purchased by the Trust.

http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cats/81/7260.htm

A 'law' that makes it an imprisonable offence to give any knowledge of cancer treatments or cures unless it is by radiation?
Also in legal terms the word 'treatment' can mean management!
When you consider that The National Radium Trust was formed in 1929 and it was known before that date that radium caused sickness
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium

In the mid-1920s, a lawsuit was filed against the United States Radium Corporation by five dying "Radium Girl" dial painters who had painted radium-based luminous paint on the dials of watches and clocks. The dial painters routinely licked their brushes to give them a fine point, thereby ingesting radium. Their exposure to radium caused serious health effects which included sores, anemia, and bone cancer. This is because radium is treated as calcium by the body, and deposited in the bones, where radioactivity degrades marrow and can mutate bone cells. During the litigation, it was determined that the company's scientists and management had taken considerable precautions to protect themselves from the effects of radiation, yet had not seen fit to protect their employees.

Also that the death rate ratio given to cancer in the 1950's was 1 in 250.......and now for men is 1 in 2-3.......you may just begin to see a conspiracy lol



Hippocrates “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food”

Thank you for having the strength to share that Suuzzaannee....I began to research cancer after my mother died and it would all seem to point at the human physical forms natural ph state is 7.34 or close to that.
Warburgs paper, which I read (having to look up many words) simply states that cancer cannot exist within an alkaline environment. For this he won the noble prize in medicine. The paper is very hard to find now?
Acidosis would seem, from that which I have learnt, to be an underlining cause in nearly all cancers? But is never written as a cause. If a person is treated for acidosis it is by the use of sodium bicarbonate to increase the ph level!

I wasn't going to include the opening of the first post as I thought that you all knew about Warburg!



Regarding the video and blood flow, yes blood cells do feed cancer but it would seem to be the type of energy given to each cell which is directive to that cell.

This post may be 'jumpy' as I am still trying to get my head around the information....lol

If you limit the 'flow' of blood you increase the risk of metabolic acidosis....
http://www.dreddyclinic.com/online_r...c_Acidosis.pdf
by 'shock'....
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/...rticlekey=5477
as known in 1969....
http://pmj.bmj.com/content/45/526/518.full.pdf

Acidosis seems to come in two ways either metabolic or respiratory....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acidosis
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2012/07/1...sor-to-cancer/

There are different forms of acidosis, such as Lactic acidosis....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactic_acidosis
but all would seem to have the same root cause, a pH imbalance.
Also anoxia is a condition characterized by an absence of oxygen supply to an organ or a tissue.
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/anoxia

Must say that to 'decode' the medical bull**** is very much like understanding the legalese meanings of law!!

This snip:
The resulting experimental signatures of responses to lactic acidosis and hypoxia are evaluated in a heterogeneous set of breast cancer datasets.Our results identify causal roles of lactic acidosis in metabolic reprogramming, and the direct functional consequence of lactic acidosis pathway activity on cellular responses and tumor development.The study also demonstrates the utility of genomic analysis that maps expression-based findings from in vitro experiments to human samples to assess links to in vivo clinical phenotypes.
http://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedres...293.g004&req=4

to me states that acidosis and a lack of oxygen (hypoxia)....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypoxia_%28medical%29
are primary in the 'cells' madness and the movement of the 'mad cells'.
A cells movement is called haptokinetic migration....
http://link.springer.com/article/10....Fs000180050498
….I think, but I need to research more

Before I forget....everything I have now been reading all seem to point to the fact that acidosis or a pH imbalance is responsible for ALL disease including any form of joint pain....consider the 'buffers' your body use's to attempt to keep the pH balance? Stripping bone, cartilage, muscles, in fact everything because if your intracellular pH changes too much....your body dies.

Actually in 1968 a report was done on the connection between metabolic acidosis and heart attacks
http://heart.bmj.com/content/30/4/493.full.pdf
Yes it ends with by saying that a link is not proved but the report was funded by the NHS (read national radium trust) and the National Heart Foundation!!
So they may have been a little bias???
You can see why a Cancer Act to limit any knowledge would be required if all health is dependant on the pH balance of each cell within a body.

A single cells pH is called 'intracellular pH' and is written as pHi.
http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/content/22/1/30
and from the above link....is known to be a cause of cancer....snip

Changes in intracellular pH regulate many cell behaviors, including proliferation, migration, and transformation....

Additionally, increased cytosolic pH is a hallmark of transformed cells from different tissue origins and genetic backgrounds, making it a common characteristic of distinct cancers....

Cytosol is the actual liquid within each cell which needs to maintain a pH balance!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytosol

So what is the pH scale?
Well they say its the 'potential hydrogen' or the 'power of hydrogen'!
It would seem that it is the amount of hydrogen ions (maybe isotopes).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_ion
Ions are a particle (atom or molecule) which has a positive or negative charge rather than being balanced.
If you think of an atom with 8 protons (positive charge) and 8 electrons (negative charge)....then this atom is balanced. Yes you also have neutrons but these have no affecting charge.
Now take an atom with 8 protons and 9 electrons....this is called an ion....because it has a particular polarity (in this case negative).
So a bit of history....

In 1909, Danish biochemist, S.P.L Sorensen proposed the use of a logarithmic scale to express the concentration of hydrogen ions (H+) and hydroxide ions (OH -). This scale has become known as the pH scale. Sorensen knew that water had a nearly balanced concentration of positive (H+) and negative (OH-) ions. The positively charged ions are called hydrogen ions and the negatively charged ions are called hydroxide ions. Scientists measured the concentrations of hydrogen ions in pure water, acidic water and alkaline water. The pure water contained a hydrogen ion concentration of 1 x 10-7 moles. The acidic water (hydrochloric acid) contained a hydrogen ion concentration of 1 x 100 moles. The alkaline water (sodium hydroxide) contained a hydrogen ion concentration of 1 x 1014 moles.
The hydrogen ion concentration was found to vary over fourteen powers of 10. A change of one pH unit changes the hydrogen ion concentration by a factor of ten. For example, a solution with a pH of 1 has 10 times more hydrogen ion concentration than a pH of 2; One hundred times more hydrogen ion concentration than a pH of 3 and so forth. This means that a solution with a pH of 1 has one million times more hydrogen ion concentration than a pH of 7. To avoid dealing with these incredibly complex exponential, scientists proposed a simplification. They converted the exponents -7, 0 and -14 to 7, 0 and 14 respectively. Subsequently, the pH scale was established ranging from 0 to 14 with the mid-point of 7 indicating neutrality. Therefore, the scale of ordinary pH values extends from 0 to 14. The pH of a neutral solution is 7. Thus the range of acid pH values extends from 0 to 7, and that of alkaline values from 7 to 14.

http://www.coastwidelabs.com/Technic...f_hydrogen.htm
An image of a pH scale....
http://staff.jccc.net/pdecell/chemistry/phscale.html

Bicarbonate is used to repair metabolic acidosis....
http://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/20/4/692.full

Alkaline acid food chart.
http://www.wakingtimes.com/wp-conten...ods-Chart.jpeg

Edward Leadskin stated that it is the negative which creates the energy running then to the positive.
We are electromagnetic beings within an electric plasma field.

Take something like smoking, how would this change the pHi or cytosol in a cell....the haemoglobin bonds with carbon monoxide and this is carried to the cells!

Apoptosis is 'programmed cell death which seems to be 'mucked up' by the cells pHi imbalance?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apoptosis



So you know exactly where I'm coming from....I have learnt that in this life most of what we are told or taught is lies, therefore I can only learn from that which I personally understand. In other words I cannot just take as read any document or accept any statement, as a TRUTH.

Even as a very young child I had to 'understand' the nature of that which I was trying to do.
Eg: my sisters were taught to swim, I would NOT be taught, I had to learn to swim myself.

I read and 'attempt' to understand each and every link posted....but I find many discrepancy’s within that which I read....such as a good link which was posted having much good information but then states....Garlic should never be used by any human being because it kills brain cells.

Now if we search and compile all the current know information on garlic that we can find on the web......50/50 as to if garlic is a wonder food or a poison?

So with that in mind.......what I am trying to do is go from the knowledge that the pH balance is of importance, which EVERY thing I read points to, to a functional understanding of why?

Right now I am looking at:

Cellular respiration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_energy

Enzymes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enzyme

electron transport chain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_transport_chain

Cellular waste products
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_waste_product

Anaerobic respiration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic_respiration

Static electricity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_electricity

If the change within the ions of a cell, create within that cell an imbalance which causes a so called 'cancer'....then this change is either electrical or magnetic.......or more likely the process of physical forms 'life' in this place is linked to static....so we could say that the discharge of the magnetic force between cells, when not balanced, is.............

Everything, humans, plants, animals, fish etc all would seem to function within this pH balance?

We are meant to resonate with this planet, our vibration, our frequency, our PH BALANCE

In pure water, the pH is called 7.

So we could say that 1 in 7 million particles is charged the other 6999999  are not, they are balanced. (not correct but using as a number)

Humans are meant to 'run' approx 7.34 pH, so just a tad over 1 in 7000000....

If you become 6 pH you will have 10 times the amount of ions within you....
5pH you will have 100 times
4pH you will have 1000 times
3pH you will have 10000 times
2pH you will have 100000 times
1pH you will have 1000000 times
0pH you will have 10 million times the amount of charged particles within you!

The other way is the same type of graph

8pH you will have 0.1 times the amount of ions within you....
9pH you will have 0.01 times
10pH you will have 0.001 times

etc.

So if our 'static' interaction, cell by cell becomes unable to frequent (vibration) this place and unable to 'connect' with this place....then that cell would lose its understanding of WHAT it is meant to be?
So it would start to attempt to be all and any thing it could, undefined?



Where the internal energy necessary for protein binding comes from is unknown at the present time, but it seems likely, based on research with electrostatic fields on various organisms, that there is an electrical component to the source. Cell walls are arranged in a double layer configuration with positive and negative ion channels built-in.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/20...630biology.htm



Looking at as above so below.

the cells within our forms, act as our forms act on this planet, act as our planet acts in this suns system, acts as.... .......etc

consider the solar wind oxygen content....
http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ACENews/ACENews48.html

it acts as a 'blood flow' for this planet incorporating oxygen and hydrogen and helium.




I didn't know if the US has the same type of thing....well it has!

National Cancer Act 1937
http://legislative.cancer.gov/history/1937
National Cancer Act 1971
http://legislative.cancer.gov/history/phsa/1971
National Cancer Act 1974
http://legislative.cancer.gov/history/phsa/1974

But these do not restrict 'advertising'.

But it is the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 which now has the supposed legal right to stop any 'advertising' with regard to cancer!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Trade_Commission
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federa...Commission_Act

15 U.S. Code § 52 - Dissemination of false advertisements
a) Unlawfulness
It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or corporation to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement—
(1) By United States mails, or in or having an effect upon commerce, by any means, for the purpose of inducing, or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly the purchase of food, drugs, devices, services, or cosmetics; or
(2) By any means, for the purpose of inducing, or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase in or having an effect upon commerce, of food, drugs, devices, services, or cosmetics.
(b Unfair or deceptive act or practice
The dissemination or the causing to be disseminated of any false advertisement within the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce within the meaning of section 45 of this title.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/52

The words....by any means....is the open to all and any form of 'book burning' or removing freedom of speech!

It comes from here:
Title 15 of the United States Code outlines the role of the commerce and trade in the United States Code.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_...ed_States_Code

Part of which is this:
15 U.S. Code § 45 - Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by Commission
(a) Declaration of unlawfulness; power to prohibit unfair practices; inapplicability to foreign trade
(1) Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.
(2) The Commission is hereby empowered and directed to prevent persons, partnerships, or corporations, except banks, savings and loan institutions described in section 57a (f)(3) of this title, Federal credit unions described in section 57a (f)(4) of this title, common carriers subject to the Acts to regulate commerce, air carriers and foreign air carriers subject to part A of subtitle VII of title 49, and persons, partnerships, or corporations insofar as they are subject to the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended [7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], except as provided in section 406(b of said Act [7 U.S.C. 227 (b)], from using unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.

Nice that bit....EXCEPT BANKS? ?
FTC Sweep Stops Peddlers of Bogus Cancer Cures
http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press...s-cancer-cures
FTC Halts Bogus Cancer Cures
http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press...s-cancer-cures
You can find the court documents of it being done:
http://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/fil...efaultjudg.pdf

Search on their site to find the cancer 'cures' stopped
http://www.ftc.gov/search/site/cancer

Three Federal agencies, FDA, FTC, and USPS, are involved in regulating advertising claims made for health products.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with FDA, is responsible for stopping false advertising of most products and services, including over-the-counter drugs, devices, and treatment regimens.
The cases described above demonstrate that the courts generally have not agreed with the arguments put forth for "freedom of choice" in unconventional cancer treatments. Though they are sympathetic to the plight of cancer patients, they see the laws, such as the FDCA, as both fulfilling Congress' intent and playing a necessary role in protecting the public from unproven treatments that might not be safe or effective.
http://miracleii-4u.com/cancer-treatment-laws.htm

Your Public Health Service Act of 1944 has a lot to do with this as well.
http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinforma.../ucm148717.htm

But its so much to go through!

This is good for searching the codes, but again hard work!!
http://uscode.house.gov/browse/preli...edition=prelim

It would seem to have a 'natural drug' approved you would need to have 2 tests done which would cost approx $1.5 billion!!!!!
If the tests are not done and passed then....its illegal.

So the 'law' in the US is not as yet being used to stop 'persons' talking....but it is there!

This is a nice list of all your federal acts....
http://www.thelists.org/a-list-of-federal-laws.html

This is a site I have just started to look at which seems interesting?
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/has...-misunderstood

And this is also interesting....
Turmeric Extract Strikes To The Root Cause of Cancer Malignancy
http://wakeup-world.com/2014/02/10/t...er-malignancy/



And you Aussies dont get away with it either!
A quick search and you find:

Cancer Council of Western Australia Act 1958
http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/pco/prod/FileStore.nsf/Documents/MRDocument:10973P/$FILE/CancerCncilofWAAct1958_00-00-00.pdf?OpenElement
taken from:
http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/legislation..._homepage.html

Cancer Council of Western Australia Act Amendment Act 1964
http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/pco/prod/FileStore.nsf/Documents/MRDocument:10425P/$FILE/CancerCncilofWAActAmAct1964_00-00-00.pdf?OpenElement
taken from:
http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/legislation..._homepage.html

And up to date:
An Act to establish Cancer Australia, and for related purposes (2006)
http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2006A00035/Html/Text

Haven't had time to find the 'law' which states that in downunderland a 'person' cannot talk about cancer cures....but I bet its there

Why....just why....have all around the world acts to control (not cure) cancer unless its the main want of fear and limitation.



I feel that this video presentation gives a very good insight into how the change of charge within a cell (the pHi balance) would cause a 'madness'.
It is very informative and very well presented, along with being entertaining.
It also dispels the 'drama' held by many that their genes 'decide' their health.

Given by Bruce Lipton, it is 1 hour and 9 mins and in my view well worth the time.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MeZL72IStGo


What I have taken from the Bruce Lipton presentation is:

If the environment outside of the cell is acidic, this will change the balance of positive and negative ions within the cell, which could affect the 'movement' of proteins within the cell.

If the 'signals' coming into the cell require the creation of proteins, from the genes, which can 'ferment sugars' to sustain the cells energy, then that is what will be done.

Or if the genes need to be re-written to then create new 'strings' which may continue the cells 'life', then this will be done, whether or not the 'new' protein is 'mad' or not.
…....
Of course stress and belief are major factors as well.


While I do not agree with everything stated within this video....I do agree with the description of Ph and the body.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=W4_8EE8a8YI

Also begs other questions....one of which is:

Are we set as acupunture needles, on the 'grids' of earth?

[chancy]

simgaz, hey there:
Great information! I never knew that the body needed to be slightly alkaline until coming on project camelot and reading alot. I asked my brother who reads libraries of books and he said he has known this all his life. I asked him why he never told me and he said..."You never asked"!
To me that's the sweetness of knowledge. Even my own brother didn't think I should know unless I asked him!

That's how I picture information websites and the internet....learn all you can and then research it to death until you come up with the "truth" needed for You or me or anyone for that matter!

Great post and have a great day!

chancy

[butcherman]

Hi Simgaz
YOU ROCK !! what a post I've experianced cancer first hand ( testicular Cancer ) ive always thought along the lines of your post unaware that these teachings were available,I've hooked into 4 litres of water a day lots of garlic in food and onions. when i was ill in 1987 i gave up smoking started to exercise and eat lots of oranges as a substitute for smoking being asthmatic this realy helped a lot just recently ive found a cure for my asthma by using antihistermin tablets ive told several of my freinds about this (3 ) and it works with them also. i try to avoid clothing that makes static electricity and try to ground my self with the earth at least once a day its turned my life around I'm a big fan of hospital podcasts and resonate with the idea of music curing you from within love to talk more on the subject

regards Butcherman

[blake]

Hi Sigmaz

Few humans today read widely, let alone in depth. Few people can express themselves easily in writing, especially for more than a couple of sentences. Few people have been taught to synthesize bits and pieces of often conflicting information, hence many people just repeat what the read instead of thinking it through, and synthesizing the information. Few people have the attention span to read long posts; let alone write them. You perhaps feel different from others because you do all of the above. You are talented in your brain skills. Expect few others to be able to match you on an intellectual discussion on exploration on any topic.

So sorry to hear about your Mom and Cancer.

From my very limited knowledge on the subject, cellular respiration is key to making the mitochondria of the cell function efficiently so that the body can produce the energy necessary for all parts of the body to function. When cell respiration weakens, the mitochondria weaken and the cancer kills.

As far as your statements which essentially stated that most humans are on “gag orders”: when it comes to discussing Cancer treatments not approved by the medical mafia, is not just true in the international legislation you referenced, but sadly can be witnessed throughout history and today from the endless list of ruin lives and dead scientists that had cures for Cancer.

Ph is also key probably, but I don’t know fro sure, related to the cellular respiration issue.

Excellent post like your last one, so sorry I am limited in my time lately to banter about more thoughts on the subject. The control of cancer management by the medical industry is something that needs to be talked about by everyone because the rise in cancer rates these past twenty years have been threatening to all of us, Few have not been touched by someone in their lives with that dreadful disease. And sadly, often people are not made aware of what they can do to prevent it or heal from it until they are in the middle of the shock of it all, and not able to think clearly, but often only desperately as they look to someone with authority to help them, while only seeing an MD telling them to take chemo, or are pressured by their loving family to take chemo because the loving family is also too desperate, helpless and scared to have the energy and focus to read widely and think deeply while in this emotional hurricane of desperation.

Yes better figure out what causes cancer now before it touches you. Better to understand the politics of cancer now before it touches you. It is bad enough that the masses have not stood up against the politics of money and banking for all these years, but when the masses don’t stand up to the politics of cancer, like they have not all these years, well than it gets very personal as your love one, or yourself fades into darkness.

I have retired from economic and political education, and now I just sit back and watch, Money, banking, freedom is one thing , but the life taken from you because of the blind ignorance of the majority of people about the politics of cancer is at another level of ignorance and fear that one would hope the average person would take concrete steps to
Yell loudly and persistently about. Talk about it. It is not talked about nearly enough to make any dent in the medical mafia control of you, the reader.