+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 25 FirstFirst 1 7 17 25 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 495

Thread: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

  1. Link to Post #121
    Avalon Member ponda's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st September 2010
    Posts
    1,300
    Thanks
    9,000
    Thanked 4,522 times in 1,011 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Can Vaccines Be Tied Into Social Engineering, Artificial Intelligence And Transhumanism: A Neuro-Musculoskeletal Specialist MD Explains

    By Catherine J. Frompovich @ Activistpost





    Before I drop some rather shocking vaccine information on readers relative to Artificial Intelligence [AI] and Transhumanism, and how most of today’s technologies are structured toward programming the human brain/mind to become a part of AI, let me just say that when I studied human nutrition, pregnant women were advised not to take any sort of medications, including aspirin! What’s happened that today, mothers-to-be are shot up with several vaccines?

    A well-qualified and learned physician, Dr Graham Downing, who is a Neuro-musculoskeletal and Functional Medicine consultant in the UK, was interviewed on The Richie Allen Show posted November 24, 2016 where he dropped scientific information about how vaccines work in pregnant women, their fetuses and in vaccinated infants. Those disclosures are something no one would want not to know, I think, as Dr Downing’s statements about the published science involved point to why so many vaccines apparently are being invented and will be mandated for all humans.

    Here’s a hint: Vaccines may be part and parcel of the New World Order’s agenda for Artificial Intelligence and Transhumanism!

    As Dr Downing points out, vaccinating pregnant women induces and/or creates inflammation in their bodies and also increases the risk of releasing inflammatory markers in their fetuses/infants. Such releases include phenotypes [the set of observable characteristics of an individual resulting from the interaction of its genotype with the environment (1)].

    Aren’t vaccines an environmental health hazard chock full of neurotoxic ingredients, e.g., ethylmercury (Thimerosal), aluminum, formaldehyde/Formalin, and other chemicals e.g., sodium borate, detergent, polysorbate 80, inset cells, human fetal cells (diploid), [7] etc.? That sounds more like a HazMat situation, or even a toxic waste dump, rather than some prophylactic to improve immunity!

    Furthermore, Doctor contends that from vaccines there’s an increase in inflammatory cells, which also are elevated in the fetal brain where cytokines release glutamates. The prefrontal lobes and the limbic system, which involves human emotions, are affected in fetuses from pregnancy vaccines administered to moms-to-be.


    According to Dr Downing, vaccines damage the front part of the brain! Aluminum, aka aluminium, a vaccine adjuvant in four formulations, prohibits glutathione production which is needed for detoxification. Furthermore, a pharmaceutical-created-enzyme-deficiency prevents detoxification capabilities for baby. Purkinje cells in the brain also are damaged.

    Additionally, pregnancy vaccines create physiological distress in pregnant women along with impacting the developing right hemisphere of the male fetus. Gross motor skills in male fetuses are impacted negatively, which coincides with more males being diagnosed with Autism. The right hemisphere of the brain controls social skills. “The research is there.”

    Another ‘tool’ in the AI project is computers, the computer tablet, and their games ostensibly designed to be addictive! They decrease the frontal brain activity, according to Dr Downing. All those computer games on phones and iPads ‘inadvertently’ have a ‘designed or accidental purpose’ in addition to being entertainment. Those computer games apparently decrease frontal lobe and the anterior cingulate cortex activity, creating “a mess in the brain,” he says.

    One of the scary points Dr Downing makes is that cell phones are creating social problems by messing with human brains. [Microwaves cause electromagnetic frequencies that impact the human brain greatly and their damage is called non-thermal adverse health effects, I offer.]

    Small children, who are two and three years old using computers-games apparently experience increases in dopamine, a brain neurotransmitter, according to Dr Downing. Psychopaths have high dopamine!

    How does the Artificial Intelligence Agenda fit in?

    Is AI a deliberate agenda or is it for corporate profits, Dr Downing asks. Dr Downing says there are five year and fifteen year goals for AI. The fifteen year goal is to have AI run everything, including humans! You have to listen to his comments about that aspect—one word: “frightening!” To ‘authentic’ his remarks, Doctor cited a report issued by the White House, “A Federal Vision for Future Computing: A Nanotechnology-inspired Grand Challenge.” Here’s what that 15-page report is about:

    Create a new type of computer that can proactively interpret and learn from data, solve unfamiliar problems using what it has learned, and operate with the energy efficiency of the human brain. [3]

    [Basically, it’s an artificial brain to replace the human brain. Also, they want to create a new soul for humans, too!]

    Guess who’s involved?

    Collaborating Agencies: Department of Energy (DOE), National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Defense (DOD), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Intelligence Community (IC) [3]

    What does that tell you?

    However, Dr Downing says that Stephen Hawking [4] supposedly is afraid of Artificial Intelligence: “potentially more dangerous than nukes.” And we will allow that to happen to us and our children?

    How about “artificial intelligence for autistic kids”!

    Ostensibly and according to Dr Downing, today’s humans are an obsolete version of Silicon Valley’s dream of what humans ought to be. Do you consider yourself obsolete?

    You can hear Dr Downing’s scientific discussion about vaccines, pregnancy and the Artificial Intelligence—Transhumanism agenda on the “Unborn Babies Being Prepared for AI and Transhumanism through Vaccines and Medicine” show in this video.


    When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations,
    the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic ~
    Dresden James.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ponda For This Post:

    BMJ (2nd December 2016), Ewan (28th November 2016), marique3652 (10th December 2016), onawah (28th November 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  3. Link to Post #122
    Avalon Member music's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th October 2011
    Location
    The Universal Heart
    Posts
    1,295
    Thanks
    2,706
    Thanked 6,788 times in 1,163 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Why are we even having this discussion? The link, and the mechanisms via which it works have been well documented. Autism is induced by vaccines via over-stimulation of the microglia, which are the immune cells of the central nervous system. Over stimulation happens via repeated neurotoxic assault, or, in layperson's terms, continually putting neurotoxins into the bloodstream. Mercury, aluminium, squalene, formaldehyde, etc, we think we can just pump that **** into our kids and nothing will happen?

    Of course, autism is not always the result. Exactly which auto-immune disorder our children (and adults) present with will depend on first and foremost the background physiological state of their body. For example: a sound enough physiology wherein the glutamine/glutamate/GABA conversion cycle is swayed toward the glutamate will induce autism. Where this cycle functions, but there is free systemic calcium, then multiple sclerosis is more common. There is of course the notion of genetics, and while dormant genes that predispose us to certain conditions can be activated by neurotoxic shock, and by other environmental conditions, the background physiology is most important.

    Over-stimulation of the microglia promotes release of the body's most pro-inflammatory cytokine. This basically prevents GABA conversion in the synapse, and continued inflammation pushes the excess glutamate and toxins associated with inappropriate inflammation out of the synapse, and into the area around the nerve sheath.

    The status of the gut, that is, the microbial balance of the gut, likewise has a massive influence on which condition is induced by persistent neurotoxic shock. Most of us have a compromised gut. Eat conventionally grown food? You gut is screwed. Glyphosate was used as an antibiotic and an industrial descaler before Monsanto stole (accidently happened across) the formula. I'll post a link to a brief overview on the evils of glyphosate from my website below. Eat meat where low dose antibiotics are used to promote growth in livestock? Your gut is screwed. Link to an article my wife and I wrote about that below. Drink fluoridated water? Your gut and endocrine system are screwed.

    Yes, vaccines induce autism, and a whole lot more. How about a line from one of my books here?

    Quote If I wanted to construct a society that most compromised the health and viability of the human animal without being too obvious about it, I couldn’t do much better than the society we have now.
    http://www.celestialroots.com/agriculturalchemicals.php

    http://wakeup-world.com/2016/06/17/a...nal-ecosystem/

    and here is one on hypothyroidism for good measure

    http://wakeup-world.com/2015/10/19/h...-quiet-plague/
    Magic is the Intelligence of Love in Action

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to music For This Post:

    Baby Steps (27th November 2016), BMJ (2nd December 2016), drneglector (1st December 2016), Ewan (28th November 2016), Flash (28th November 2016), onawah (28th November 2016), ponda (2nd December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  5. Link to Post #123
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    An actual scientific study!
    Forget the editorializing about how vaccines save lives--the scientific conclusions are interesting
    Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports
    http://journal.frontiersin.org/artic...00270/abstract
    Quote Export citation

    Front. Public Health | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00270

    Anthony R. Mawson1*, Brian D. Ray2, Azad R. Bhuiyan3 and Binu Jacob4
    1Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health (Initiative), Jackson State University, USA
    2National Home Education Research Institute, USA
    3Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health (Initiative), USA
    4Former Graduate Student, Jackson State University, School of Public Health (Initiative), USA
    ABSTRACT
    Background: Vaccinations have prevented millions of infectious illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths among US children. Yet the long-term health outcomes of the routine vaccination program remain unknown. Studies have been recommended by the Institute of Medicine to address this question.
    Specific Aims: To compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health outcomes, and to determine whether an association found between vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remains significant after adjustment for other measured factors.
    Design: A cross-sectional survey of mothers of children educated at home.
    Methods: Homeschool organizations in four states (Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon) were asked to forward an email to their members, requesting mothers to complete an anonymous online questionnaire on the vaccination status and health outcomes of their biological children ages 6 to 12.
    Results: A total of 415 mothers provided data on 666 children, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability). After adjustment, the factors that remained significantly associated with NDD were vaccination (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.8), male gender (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2, 4.3), and preterm birth (OR 5.0, 95% CI: 2.3, 11.6). In a final adjusted model, vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5).
    Conclusions: In this study based on mothers’ reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors. However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.
    Last edited by onawah; 28th November 2016 at 05:00.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (2nd December 2016), Cara (1st December 2016), Ewan (28th November 2016), Flash (28th November 2016), Hervé (2nd December 2016), marique3652 (10th December 2016), ponda (2nd December 2016), seko (2nd December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  7. Link to Post #124
    Moderator (on Sabbatical) Cara's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th February 2014
    Location
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,432
    Thanks
    9,844
    Thanked 7,348 times in 1,330 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    An actual scientific study!
    Forget the editorializing about how vaccines save lives--the scientific conclusions are interesting
    Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports
    http://journal.frontiersin.org/artic...00270/abstract
    Thanks @onawah. It appears this article has already been taken down:

    Quote Error 412

    The requested content is not yet available.
    Article 231518 is not yet publicly available.
    Here is a Google cached copy of the page: http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=us
    *I have loved the stars too dearly to be fearful of the night*

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Cara For This Post:

    BMJ (6th December 2016), Ewan (2nd December 2016), Hervé (2nd December 2016), onawah (1st December 2016), ponda (2nd December 2016), seko (2nd December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  9. Link to Post #125
    Avalon Member ponda's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st September 2010
    Posts
    1,300
    Thanks
    9,000
    Thanked 4,522 times in 1,011 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    It appears that the cached link and the original article have been pulled from the web.
    http://www.wakingtimes.com/2016/12/0...3274b-54356065


    First Study on Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children Pulled from Web



    Christina Sarich, Staff Writer
    Waking Times

    The results of the first ever study comparing the health of vaccinated children vs. unvaccinated children is out, and they are already causing controversy. For many – hundreds of thousands of families that have already been injured by vaccines – the results won’t be surprising, but to many others, the findings might be a little shocking. This is possibly why the scientific journal which originally published the results withdrew the study from publication.

    The abstract of the study was published online in Frontiers in Public Health after being accepted November 2. The study compared children’s health via surveys of mothers who home-schooled their children aged 6-12 years. Nearly 40 percent of the children had never been vaccinated, so the control group was adequate to do a good comparison against children who had been vaccinated.

    After heavy criticism from the public and scientific community due to the results of the study, though, it was retracted. Why? Those that were vaccinated were three times more likely to be diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism.

    The abstract specifically stated,

    Quote “A total of 415 mothers provided data on 666 children, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability).”
    The study further concluded,

    “In this study based on mothers’ reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors. However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

    The initial backlash was significant. Public comments included, “this study is of poor design, though not impossible results. Study relies of self-report of moms, inducing bias,” and, “Another garbage vaccine study in Frontiers journal. Scientists, stop reviewing/publishing there.”

    Science Blogs also quickly posted an article titled, “Antivaccinationists promote a bogus internet “survey.” Hilarity ensues as it’s retracted.”

    When the paper was pulled, the publishers were also accused of not following a proper retraction process. Though the journal isn’t the first to pull a vaccine paper amid public criticism — in February, Vaccine temporarily removed — then soon retracted — a paper linking the vaccine for Human papillomavirus to behavioral problems in mice; a modified version of the paper was later republished, the retraction is suspect considering how quickly the paper was pulled. When the publishers were asked why this happened, they simply responded that the paper was submitted for review, but had not been approved.

    Researchers like Catherine J. Frompovich likely wouldn’t think the study is so ‘hilarious’ as Science Blogs attests. She writes of a doctor in the UK who believes vaccines are indeed tied to autism. Dr. Graham Downing, who is a Neuro-musculoskeletal and Functional Medicine consultant in the UK has found that the vaccination of pregnant women increases inflammation in their bodies and also increases the risk of releasing inflammatory markers in their fetuses/infants. Such releases include phenotypes [the set of observable characteristics of an individual resulting from the interaction of its genotype with the environment.]

    Downing also contends that the increased inflammation in cells caused by vaccines, also elevate in the fetal brain where cytokines release glutamates. The prefrontal lobes and the limbic system, which involves human emotions, are affected in fetuses from pregnancy vaccines administered to moms-to-be. So, not only are children outside the womb affected, but the neurological/immunological decline starts while they are still in the womb.

    Downing also attests that vaccines are tied to the artificial intelligence rollout goals of the elite. As Frompovich writes,

    “Dr. Downing says there are five-year and fifteen year goals for AI. The fifteen-year goal is to have AI run everything, including humans! You have to listen to his comments about that aspect—one word: “frightening!” To ‘authentic’ his remarks, Doctor cited a report issued by the White House, “A Federal Vision for Future Computing: A Nanotechnology-inspired Grand Challenge.”

    Here’s what that 15-page report is about:

    Create a new type of computer that can proactively interpret and learn from data, solve unfamiliar problems using what it has learned, and operate with the energy efficiency of the human brain. [3]

    [Basically, it’s an artificial brain to replace the human brain. Also, they want to create a new soul for humans, too!]”

    So, why are vaccine promoters so quick to dismiss, or make a drivel of a study based on mothers’ health reports of their children? Bias or no bias – it’s hard to dismiss a 300 percent increase in autism and neurological damage rates – but those reasons are left to your imagination.
    Last edited by ponda; 2nd December 2016 at 05:03.
    When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations,
    the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic ~
    Dresden James.

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ponda For This Post:

    BMJ (2nd December 2016), Cara (3rd December 2016), Ewan (2nd December 2016), Hervé (2nd December 2016), onawah (2nd December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  11. Link to Post #126
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Posts
    729
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3,940 times in 660 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    I don't see Dr. Andrew Moulden's name enough in these discussions and I think he made a very strong case for the cause of autism before his also untimely death.

    He worked to expose the dangers of the ISCHEMIA side effects from vaccines - the strokes that he claimed were the cause of autism. There are many kinds from mild to severe.

    -From memory.... Ischemia is what causes strokes - it's when a vein gets blocked, and this lack of blood in any of many specific places causes one of a variety of strokes.
    -A telltale sign of having had a stroke is a facial imbalance of some sort - one slightly crossed eye, a droopy aspect of one side - like ALL autistic kids have.
    -The immune systems of babies are vastly overstimulated by these toxic ingredients/foreign threats injected directly into their bloodstream that they are not ready for.
    -The sudden overstimulation causes a massive increase in white blood cells.
    -White blood cells are huge compared to red blood cells.
    -Babies capillaries are teeny teeny and only able to pass one white blood cell at a time.
    -A capillary in the brain is easily clogged up with the overabundance of white blood cells after a vaccination and stops the blood flow at that capillary.
    -The lack of oxygen at that capillary causes the brain damage that causes autism and the stroke.

    http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/dr-...produces-harm/

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to waves For This Post:

    BMJ (2nd December 2016), Ewan (2nd December 2016), onawah (2nd December 2016), ponda (2nd December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  13. Link to Post #127
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    New Secretary of Health and Human Services
    This looks like it might actually be good news re vaccines

    Quote U.S. Representative Tom Price has been nominated for the position of Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Service (HHS) by President-elect Donald Trump. The six-term Republican congressman from Georgia’s 6th District currently serves as Chairman of the House Budget Committee.1

    If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Rep. Price, 62, would lead a department that has an annual operating budget of more than $1 trillion and oversees a number of key health regulatory agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).2 3 4

    Rep. Price is an orthopedic surgeon.1 5 He is a member of the GOP Doctors Caucus in the House—a group of physicians in the House that has aggressively opposed the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare.6 He is a strong proponent of individual autonomy, which includes the right of patients to make independent choices about their health care options, with minimal intervention by government. In an interview with ThinkProgress, Rep. Price said:

    What government-run medicine does is forces other individuals besides themselves and their families making medical decisions. … [W]hat I support is allowing patients to make independent medical decisions.7
    Rep. Price is also a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), which supports informed consent to medical risk taking and opposes mandatory vaccination. The group has called for a moratorium on all government mandated vaccines.8 9 10

    AAPS Executive Director Jane Orient, MD, stated in a press release issued by the organization that,

    “Our children face the possibility of death or serious long-term adverse effects from mandated vaccines that aren’t necessary or that have very limited benefits.10
    Dr. Orient added:

    It’s obscene to threaten to seize a child just because his parents refuse medical treatment that is obviously unnecessary and perhaps even dangerous. AAPS believes that parents, with the advice of their doctors, should make decisions about their children’s medical care—not government bureaucrats.10
    Rep. Price has said that, “when patients, and their families, and their doctors are not allowed to independently decide what care should be provided, we lose more than our healthcare system. We lose our morality and our freedom.”
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (3rd December 2016), Chester (3rd December 2016), Ewan (3rd December 2016), Houman (3rd December 2016), JRS (2nd December 2016), norman (2nd December 2016), ponda (2nd December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  15. Link to Post #128
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    ALERT! FDA Fast Tracking of ALL New Vaccines (3091 and 3092)
    Unconscionable Pharma and Vaccine Administrator Liability Shield for Fetal Vaccine Injury or Death Caused by Vaccines Given in Pregnancy (3093)
    Please take action
    From: National Vaccine Information Center

    The following came in an email newsletter from NVIC today
    ...and is posted on Facebook here:
    https://www.facebook.com/notes/natio...54569966497931
    Quote URGENT: Contact US Senate NOW!
    Demand Removal of Vaccine Sections from HR 34 (21st Century Cures Act):
    1) FDA Fast Tracking of ALL New Vaccines (3091 and 3092)

    2) Unconscionable Pharma and Vaccine Administrator Liability Shield for Fetal Vaccine Injury or Death Caused by Vaccines Given in Pregnancy (3093)

    Send Emails and Faxes This Weekend. Call ALL DAY Monday before vote at 5:30 pm EST

    Dear NVIC Advocacy Members,
    Just when you thought you could start to prepare for your holiday season, a lame duck Congress is about to “Scrooge” the public over vaccines and give a huge holiday bonus to drug companies. Your action is urgently needed to email and fax your two US Senators over the weekend and call them on Monday to demand the removal of three sections (3091, 3092 and 3093) from a “Christmas Tree Bill” called The 21st Century Cures Act, HR 34 that was just passed by the US House of Representatives. A video of the discussion and vote on this bill is available on CSPAN US House Legislative Business (scroll to 1:42:20).
    The 21st Century Cures Act legislation was originally passed in the house last year on July 10, 2015 as HR 6. NVIC issued a press release on July 22, 2015 and Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC Co-founder and President, released a referenced commentary in opposition to this proposed legislation in which she said,
    “The 21st Century Cures Act is a drug company stockholder’s dream and a consumer’s worst nightmare,” said Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC Co-founder and President. “Making experimental drugs quickly available for the sick and dying, who voluntarily choose to use them, is one thing but Congress should not be greasing the skids to license experimental vaccines that government will recommend and legally require healthy children and adults to use. It is a prescription for disaster.”
    After passing the house in 2015, the legislation stalled. Many of the provisions of HR 6 were broken up into several smaller bills, but over the Thanksgiving holiday, the legislation was quickly reassembled into a new version including some sections from HR 6 and adding some new sections, amending them all onto bill HR 34. HR 34 was originally a bill that only addressed “Tsunami Warning, Education, and Research”, but was passed by the US House of Representatives on November 30th as an 824 page monstrosity!
    ACTION NEEDED:
    1) Over this weekend on Saturday December 3rd and December 4th, FAX AND EMAIL your two US Senators demanding that they remove sections 3091, 3092, and 3093 from HR 34, the 21st Century Cures Act. See sample letter below.

    2) On Monday December 5th, CALL your two US Senators and ask to speak to the person who is in charge of HR 34, The 21st Century Cures Act. Tell him/her that it is critical all 3 sections, 3091, 3092, and 3093, are removed because they fast track the approval of all vaccines and shield drug companies and vaccine administrators from liability for fetal injuries and deaths caused by vaccines marketed for and given to pregnant woman. Tell them that if this bill passes without these sections removed, you will be demanding that your state legislators REMOVE ALL VACCINE MANDATES from state law.

    3) To find your US Senators and their contact information, register/login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal, Click on the “National” tab on the top of your home page. Your two U.S. Senators are listed on the right hand side. Click on their names for direct links to all of their contact information. You can also find US Senate contact information here.

    4) Please FORWARD this email to your contacts asking them to help this weekend and Monday. This alert is also posted on the National Vaccine Information Center Facebook page and can be shared on social media.



    SAMPLE FAX AND EMAIL
    December 3, 2016
    The Honorable FIRSTNAME LASTNAME
    STREET ADDRESS
    Washington, D.C. 20515

    Dear Senator LASTNAME,
    As a constituent of yours, I am writing to you for your assistance.
    On Monday, December 5th, you will be asked to vote on HR 34, the 21st Century Cures Act. Please amend HR 34 to REMOVE Sections 3091, 3092, and 3093 from this bill prior to voting because they shield drug companies and vaccine administrators from liability for fetal injuries and deaths caused by vaccines marketed for and given to pregnant woman and they rush the regulatory approval process by fast tracking all new vaccines.
    Please remove the following sections from HR 34:
    SEC. 3091. PREDICTABLE REVIEW TIMELINES OF VACCINES BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES - Page 302 and 303
    SEC. 3092. REVIEW OF PROCESSES AND CONSISTENCY OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS - Page 303-305
    These sections fast track and incentivize vaccines outside of the normal regulatory review and licensing process.

    Fast tracking all vaccines is a terrible idea because:

    · Vaccines are given to healthy people who are not desperate for a disease treatment and the side effects can injure and kill them. (Here Comes the 21st Century Cures Act: Say Goodbye to Vaccine Safety Science)

    · Pharma has no liability for injuries or deaths caused by any vaccine. (End Pharma Liability Shield Endangering Public Health and Human Rights)

    · Many people in America currently do not have the option to decline a vaccine required for school or work. (Blackmail and the Medical Vaccine Exemption)

    · Skepticism of vaccine safety is already at an all-time high, and rushing the approval process will just create more distrust.

    SEC. 3093. ENCOURAGING VACCINE INNOVATION, VACCINES RECOMMENDED FOR USE IN PREGNANT WOMEN - Page 305 – 309
    This section, which appeared originally in S.2742, includes a provision on pages 307- 309 that forces unborn babies injured or killed after maternal vaccination out of the courts and into the Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).

    Established by Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–11) in 1986, the VICP shields vaccine manufactures and vaccine administrators from most civil product liability. The U.S. Supreme Court declared vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” in 2011 and removed all product liability from FDA licensed vaccines.

    Sec. 3093 (c) (3) adds ‘‘A covered vaccine administered to a pregnant woman shall constitute more than one administration, one to the mother and one to each child (as such term is defined in subsection (f)(2)) who was in utero at the time such woman was administered the vaccine.’’

    It is unconscionable to absolve the manufacturer and vaccine administrator from liability for injuries and deaths when the vaccine is marketed to and administered to pregnant women and yet it is not tested by the vaccine manufacturer or approved as safe for use by the government by a “child in utero.”

    Removing drug company and vaccine administrator liability for unborn babies should be removed from this bill because:

    · Vaccines aren’t adequately tested and approved as safe for use in pregnant women with respect to their unborn babies. In fact they are classified as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals because it is not known whether the vaccines are genotoxic and can cause fetal harm or death. There are no sufficient studies looking at the health and the viability of a pregnant vaccinated woman’s baby before or after birth and comparing that information to women who do not get vaccinated while pregnant. Vaccine induced brain and body inflammation and chromosomal changes are not evaluated. See FDA Prepares to Fast Track New Vaccines Targeting Pregnant Women.

    · The government run Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is already a miserable failure and should be repealed, not expanded to include unborn babies. See National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) Renews Call for End to Product Liability Shield for Vaccine Manufacturers.

    · Pregnant women are already being pushed to get Tdap and Flu Vaccines during pregnancy even though safety hasn’t been proven for the mother or baby. See Vaccine During Pregnancy: Is It Safe? With no threat of liability, there will be no end to the new vaccines that Pharma will target on pregnant women. Legislators should not be fooled into thinking that the task force in Section 2041 (see page 93-99) will provide any protection for unborn babies.

    If sections 3091, 3092, and 3093 are not removed, VOTE NO on HR 34.
    Sincerely,
    YOUR NAME
    YOUR STREET ADDRESS
    YOUR CITY, STATE, ZIP
    YOUR EMAIL
    YOUR PHONE


    ADDITIONAL CONCERNS:
    These are just a few sections of this bill that should be removed. The bill is 824 pages long and there is not enough time to analyze other sections that could be problematic like NIH Innovation Projects to support the development of cancer vaccines in Section 1001 (Page 14); accelerating the development and innovation of medical countermeasures including vaccines in Sections 3084 (Pages 280-281) and Section 3085; and section 4002 on interoperability of electronic health records that could include immunization tracking systems and registries (Pages 327 – 362). If you have legislative, staff or lobbyist connections in Washington, please contact them asking for their assistance with this.
    Sincerely,
    NVIC Advocacy Team
    National Vaccine Information
    http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
    https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx

    The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials. We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (6th December 2016), Ewan (4th December 2016), ponda (4th December 2016), william r sanford72 (4th December 2016)

  17. Link to Post #129
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC
    Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC
    December 04, 2016
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...rid=1782409178



    Quote By Dr. Mercola

    Statistics don't lie, but statisticians certainly can. In his book, "Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC," investigative journalist James Grundvig exposes what really goes on at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    In it, he reveals how the agency has engaged in massive fraud, misinformation and manipulation of vaccine information. What made Grundvig write such a book?

    "A couple of reasons," he says. "One is I have an autistic son who's 16 years old now. He's one of the 5,000 cases kicked out of vaccine court [for] thimerosal poisoning.

    Number two, I'm first generation Norwegian-American. Poul Thorsen, the main manipulator — but not the only one — is of Danish descent. I was introduced to an alliance [that asked me] to track down Thorsen over in Denmark, a culture and country I know very well."

    Danish Scientist Charged in Vaccine Research Scam

    Thorsen is a major player and an essential character in this real-life drama. In 2011, he was charged with 13 counts of wire fraud and nine counts of money laundering. A federal grand jury alleged Thorsen stole over $1 million from autism research funding between February 2004 and June 2008.

    He stole the money while serving as the principal investigator for a program studying the relationship between autism and exposure to vaccines. At the time, The Copenhagen Post reported that:1

    "... [Thorsen] submitted over a dozen false invoices from the CDC for research expenses to Aarhus University … instructing them to transfer the funds to a CDC account, which was in fact his personal account ...

    Thorsen's research on autism is widely known in academic circles, where he was until this week a highly respected figure. A paper of his on the subject, which is known as 'The Danish Study,' is quoted extensively to refute the autism vaccine connection."

    As of 2014, Thorsen was permanently expelled from Denmark's university hospital system. Thorsen has been a fugitive for the past five years. Yet his whereabouts are no secret. As noted by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in a 2015 Forbes article:2

    "The fact that he is roaming free and is easy to find, despite the U.S. Federal indictment … suggests a lack of enthusiasm by HHS and CDC to press for his capture and extradition.

    The agency undoubtedly fears that a public trial would expose the pervasive corruption throughout CDC's vaccine division and the fragility of the science supporting CDC's claims about thimerosal safety."

    The Master Manipulator

    Thorsen's spectacular demise was likely the result of an inside tip to Aarhus University. But was he really the sole person responsible for the creation of these manipulated studies? According to Grundvig's investigation, the CDC appears to have had a clear hand in the deception.

    In 1999, Thorsen — who had earned his Ph.D. in Denmark the year before — was invited to the CDC in Atlanta as a foreign visiting scientist. He arrived at a time when there was a lot of discussion between vaccine makers and the CDC to remove thimerosal from vaccines.

    Thorsen ended up being hired full-time to conduct five studies on Danish people, as the Danes had a preexisting database covering the entire population.

    In the U.S., no federal health authority was collecting this kind of comprehensive vaccination and health data. "That was the beginning of five corrupt Danish studies that were done: four on thimerosal; one on MMR," Grundvig says.

    The Danish Study

    Thorsen's "Danish Study,"3 which was never retracted, reported a 20-fold increase in autism in Denmark AFTER mercury-based preservatives like thimerosal were banned from vaccines. This study has since been used to support the idea that thimerosal has no bearing on autism rates.

    However, it was actually an example of lying by omission, because at the same time the apparent autism increase took place, a new Danish law required autism cases to be reported on the national level. There was also a new clinic dedicated to autism treatment.

    These two factors were likely the driving forces behind the sudden spike in reported autism cases, but the researchers didn't even disclose them, let alone take them into account. Despite the obvious ramifications of these omitted details, the CDC has relied on the Danish Study to "prove" their case that MMR vaccine and mercury are safe.

    Moreover, the fact that Thorsen's scientific integrity was in serious question was completely lost on the CDC, which issued the following statement following his arrest warrant:4

    "Dr. Thorsen was one of many co-authors on these research projects. All of these were subject to extensive peer review and we have no reason to suspect that there are any issues related to the integrity of the science."

    CDC Dumped Agent Orange Studies to Avoid Backlash From Injured Veterans

    In researching Thorsen's involvement with the CDC, Grundvig came across other instances of malfeasance. In 1984, Coleen Boyle was a principal investigator for the CDC, charged with investigating the effects of Agent Orange. Today, Boyle is the director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD), an arm of the CDC.

    In the 1980s, the CDC was given extensive information from the army on Operation Ranch Hand about the flight patterns of Agent Orange. The information was archived in Pennsylvania, but the CDC refused to go to the archives and look at it. Doing so meant they'd have to face the truth about the contamination of U.S. troops — about half a million American veterans who suffer from cancers and other diseases caused by Agent Orange.

    The CDC basically gave up on the Agent Orange studies saying they "couldn't figure it out," when in fact they could have, had they simply gone to Pennsylvania. In so doing, they forfeited $21 million in research money, which in and of itself raises questions about motives. Apparently they deemed the loss of $21 million to be preferable to what they might find by doing the research.

    "The 101st Congress came out [with a report in 1990 and called it [the] "Agent Orange cover up" to basically skewer the CDC. Unfortunately, nothing happened. They didn't fire the people in charge. They didn't clean house in the CDC. Once those people at the top were able to get away with this, they felt emboldened. They also had a template for future issues like Ebola and Zika," Grundvig says.

    With Boyle, the CDC demonstrated they are really masterful at covering up issues that are directly related to the public health, or issues that could have a negative impact on people's perception of a certain exposure.

    The Link Between Thimerosal and Autism

    To this day, most doctors will tell you the science is settled and there’s no link between vaccines and autism. In reality, the science is FAR from settled. In 2000, two secret meetings took place. The first one, in May, took place in Puerto Rico. This meeting covered aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. The second meeting took place in Simpsonwood5 three weeks later.

    "In those meetings, they talked about how they all realized — the scientists within those meetings, from the CDC, from college institutions, from Big Pharma vaccine makers — all agreed that thimerosal is a problem, and aluminum is a problem. But they can't change overnight and lose that kind of money …

    These two meetings produced results from foreign scientists, like Dr. Thomas Verstraeten out of Belgium. The CDC realized they had a major problem on their hands with the general public. They found thimerosal … is dangerous to the brain, especially of babies, infants and children."

    The CDC desperately needed to prove there's no link between vaccines and autism, and Thorsen ended up being the guy hired to produce that evidence. Had the CDC not covered up the truth, we'd probably have an entirely different discussion on vaccines today.

    As noted by Grundvig, some of Thorsen’s studies kept getting extended because the CDC simply wasn’t comfortable with the results; even with manipulation, they kept showing an association between the number of vaccines and the rise of autism.

    “What’s amazing is Thorsen coming from Denmark. Thimerosal was banned in Denmark in 1991 — fully enacted in 1992. Vaccines today in Denmark have no thimerosal whatsoever. So, you have Thorsen agreeing to do whatever the CDC wanted to, which was manipulate the data, to lose data, to produce results that would favor [thimerosal],” Grundvig says.

    Thorsen Colleague Caught Colluding With CDC to Cherry Pick Data

    Thorsen worked at Aarhus University outside of Copenhagen, Denmark. At the university, he had a small research group he called the North Atlantic Neurological Epidemiology Alliance (NANEA). Part of that research group was a Ph.D. candidate named Kreesten Meldgaard Madsen.

    Madsen was the principal investigator on at least two out of the five studies Thorsen did on behalf of the CDC. She came under fire when leaked emails6 showed she was coordinating with CDC officials "intent on fraudulently cherry picking facts to prove vaccine safety," according to a report by The Huffington Post.7

    "They were under duress because the CDC was directly involved, with Diana Schendel going to Denmark several times to produce better results. These studies were done over and over again. In fact, there's one email from Coleen Boyle that basically went out to the Danes saying, 'What happens if we got rid of the 2001 data set completely? What happens to the line then? Does it flatten?' At the end of the day, that's exactly what they did," Grundvig says.

    CDC Whistleblower Confirms Vaccine-Autism Cover-Up

    In his book, Grundvig explains how, were the studies done properly using valid scientific criteria, they would have revealed some incredible insights. For starters, they would have shown that autism is in fact correlated with thimerosal exposure.
    Brian Hooker is one of the researchers who has gone back to re-evaluate Thorsen's studies. In 2017, Danish scientists will again redo the studies, to hopefully settle the matter.

    Thorsen was hardly the only manipulator of data at the CDC, however. Dr. William Thompson, a research scientist at the CDC's National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases (NCIR), is another. He co-authored four studies refuting a link between the MMR vaccine and autism, as well as thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.

    According to Thompson, one of the studies found that African-American boys who received the MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months had an increased risk for autism.8 He also maintains that other CDC studies have found a relationship between thimerosal and tics, which are associated with autism.9

    Clearly, there's no way for the truth to get out unless we have skilled investigative journalists like Grundvig bringing us the full story. After that, it's a matter of sharing the information, because you can be sure this information will not appear in The New York Times or on your local news station. It's suppressed by design.

    Thimerosal Is Still a Major Vaccine Ingredient

    In the early 2000s there was a major push to remove thimerosal from vaccines, but it never took the form of law. Instead, vaccine makers were encouraged to reduce or eliminate thimerosal in their vaccines on a voluntary basis. Some did so, but according to Grundvig, even vaccines that claim to be thimerosal-free are not entirely devoid of it.

    "If you read the labels, it says "thimerosal-depleted" … They remove [thimerosal] in the process. It's filtered out, but it's not filtered out 100 percent. There's still thimerosal in all of the thimerosal-containing vaccines as there were before, just a lot less. However, in the flu vaccine, it's full bore thimerosal.

    It's the cheapest and fastest way to make it. I don't think that vaccine makers are interested in changing the 20th century recipe to making vaccines. It's cheap and fast. That's all they care about. They do not care about safety. They don't care about children's health. With poor children's health, they are able to take care of children, on the other end … with drugs and treatments and so forth. They continuously make money off every American citizen out there," Grundvig says.

    Annual Flu Shots Are a Health Disaster in the Making

    The flu vaccine is perhaps the most egregious example of this criminal activity. When I graduated from medical school, it was only recommended for health care workers, those over 55, and those with chronic diseases such as pulmonary diseases or cystic fibrosis. The target population was a relatively small percentage.

    Now, it's recommended for every single individual in the United States, each and every year starting at the age of 6 months until death. It's truly beyond irrational. Not only is it ineffective, but it's perniciously toxic, thanks to the thimerosal. (For clarification, flu vaccines do not contain aluminum — a highly toxic adjuvant.)

    "Even when they don't get it right — like last year, when they realized they didn't predict the strain properly [so] the flu vaccine was completely useless — they say, 'We admit it's useless. We were wrong, but take it anyway,'" Grundvig says.

    And why wouldn't they? Drug companies, health officials and administering doctors are all completely insulated from lawsuits, so people suffering side effects have no impact on the bottom line. They have absolutely no incentive to urge you to weigh the risks and benefits. As long as you take the shot, they profit. And, if you're harmed, they continue to profit in other ways, since your treatment will undoubtedly involve medical care and drugs.

    OTC Tapeworm Drug Kills Zika

    At the end of the day, I believe it comes down to us — we all need to take the incentive to spread this information to our friends and family; make them aware of the corruption, fraud and manipulation occurring that is preventing them from understanding the truth about any given matter. Grundvig offers another example:

    "The Florida State University [FSU] discovered that an off-the-shelf remedy [Nicolsamide, an FDA approved drug used to treat tapeworm] likely either suppresses or eliminates Zika. But did the press cover this? … You'd have to go to Florida State University10 and some other lesser blogs to actually find this story.

    The reason for that is they do not want that to interfere with the CDC going to Congress and begging for $1.1 billion for a vaccine that no one's going to need. Ninety percent of that money will be for a vaccine for Zika …"

    More Information

    If you have an interest in vaccine safety and/or autism, you won't want to miss out on Grundvig's book, "Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC." It clearly reveals why we cannot blindly trust our federal health agencies.

    We must educate ourselves and understand the political and financial dynamics that underlie the recommendations coming from these agencies. Failing to do so can quite literally be dangerous to your health. In this case, Grundvig has done a remarkable job of explaining the situation at the CDC that has allowed the claim that thimerosal-containing vaccines have no role in autism.

    This is not to say that there are no other factors involved in autism. Evidence suggests Roundup and other glyphosate-containing pesticides may play a role. Ditto for other toxic exposures and electromagnetic field (EMF) exposures. Having an unbalanced gut microbiome also appears to influence the outcome. There are many variables that, when combined, can result in autism. Still, that does not mean we should give vaccines a free pass.

    Projections suggest that within the next 25 years, half of all children will be autistic. There is no way a culture can survive with half of the population being in the autistic spectrum. We're looking at the collapse of society if the rise in autism isn't stopped or reversed, and that means addressing ALL known factors.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (6th December 2016), Ewan (6th December 2016), Hervé (6th December 2016), marique3652 (10th December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  19. Link to Post #130
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Mandatory flu vaccine for health workers.
    I just saw this on youtube, from a nurse who is refusing to take the flu "vaccine", though it will mean her job.
    This issue is going to make for interesting alliances between Fundamentalist Christians, progressives and other otherwise conflicting groups...
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  20. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (6th December 2016), Ewan (6th December 2016), Fairy Friend (6th December 2016), Hervé (5th December 2016), marique3652 (10th December 2016), Paul (5th December 2016), RunningDeer (5th December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  21. Link to Post #131
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    72
    Posts
    27,723
    Thanks
    28,846
    Thanked 129,218 times in 20,629 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    I just saw this on youtube, from a nurse who is refusing to take the flu "vaccine", though it will mean her job.
    That Lauren Atkinson is right on - bravo!

  22. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    Alan (6th December 2016), BMJ (6th December 2016), Ewan (6th December 2016), marique3652 (10th December 2016), onawah (5th December 2016), RunningDeer (5th December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  23. Link to Post #132
    France On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,765
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,327 times in 15,478 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Not sure if they are relatives, with miss-spelt names, but here is the testimony from another Attkisson, Sharyl:

    My interview with former CBS star reporter: fake news

    by Jon Rappoport Dec5, 2016

    CBS is now publishing the names of sites they claim are fake news. Well, what about CBS itself?

    Unless you’ve been living in a cave, you’re aware that a film, Vaxxed, has been showing in theaters across America and overseas—and audiences are stunned by its revelations.

    Vaxxed exposes a huge scandal at the CDC, where a long-time researcher, William Thompson, confessed (2014) that he and colleagues committed gross fraud in a study of the MMR vaccine.

    Thompson admitted the evidence showed the vaccine led to a higher risk of autism in children—but that finding was intentionally buried, and the vaccine was given a free pass.

    Of course, mainstream reporters have been mercilessly attacking Vaxxed, and a segment of the population finds it impossible to believe that the CDC would ever commit this kind of fraud.

    So, as a mind-changer, let me take you back to the late summer of 2009, and the Swine Flu epidemic, which was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?

    The problem was, the CDC was concealing another scandal.

    At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

    Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

    What was the Agency up to?

    Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
    Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

    Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

    —end of interview excerpt—
    I’ll add a few details. It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

    That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

    But it gets even worse.

    Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

    Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

    Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

    In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

    There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

    Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

    So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a vaccine increasing the risk of autism…you can lay that one to rest.

    The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.

    It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it will get away with it.

    And CBS will conveniently forget how it aided and abetted the CDC, by censoring real news, and instead opted for egregious and titanic fake bull****.

    Jon Rappoport
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    BMJ (6th December 2016), Ewan (6th December 2016), onawah (6th December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  25. Link to Post #133
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    ALERT! Stop 21st Century Cures Act
    https://www.citizens.org/stop-21st-century-cures-act/
    Quote
    Stop 21st Century Cures Act!
    Allies "A Voice for Choice" Rally Opposition

    December 6, 2016

    Dear Citizen for Health,

    Special thanks to A Voice for Choice for sharing this call to action and for organizing citizen activists to be heard on this issue. The folks at A Voice for Choice are allies in the fight to ensure everyone has access to the truthful, non-misleading information so important for deciding how to maintain one's health and wellness.

    ACTION NEEDED: We need your help to stop the 21st Century Cures Act (HR34 – was HR6), by calling both of your Senators NOW and urging them to vote NO on this bill AND NO on the Cloture.

    Why? Here are just a few reasons:

    Informed Consent (or lack thereof) in HR34: The 21st Century Cures Act would no longer require the informed consent of the subjects for medical devices or drugs.
    Health Information Privacy (or lack thereof) in HR34: The 21st Century Cures Act would allow the government to access and use your private health information and records without your authorization.
    Electric shock "therapy" in HR34: The 21st Century Cures Act would fast track Electric shock "therapy" as a cure for maladaptive behaviors and seizures.
    This is urgent and it could be out of our hands within the next day or two. Please act now - just a few minutes can make a BIG difference.
    Thank you for working to preserve health freedom for all!


    The Citizens for Health Team
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Fairy Friend (6th December 2016), Hervé (7th December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  27. Link to Post #134
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Another ALERT! Vaccine Disaster
    Quote Take action: Stop HR34, 21st Century Cures Act
    Take Action!
    http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/ale...52626&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]
    A disaster for healthcare consumers

    Please click on the Take Action link above to send a message to your two US Senators today and ask them to vote "no" on HR 34, the 21st Century Cures Act. This 824-page bill is a collection of wish lists from the drug, vaccine and medical industries that significantly weakens safety and efficacy review policies for drugs, medical devices and vaccines; weakens patient rights and rights to informed consent, and repeals policies to prevent payments and gifts (bribes) for physicians. The bill will also take away the existing legal right to sue by children injured in utero by vaccines.

    The bill has already passed the US House of Representatives so contacting your Senators are crucial to stop this bill that is very bad news for all consumers of medical services in the United States.

    Just a few of the many unacceptable changes the bill includes:

    Currently, a child injured in utero by a vaccine has a legal right to sue the doctor and vaccine manufacturer. HR 34 takes away those basic rights and would force the child to apply in the dead-end National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
    Allows experimental drugs and vaccines to be used on people without informed consent,
    Allows the licensing of medical devices and drugs that have not gone through rigorous safety and efficacy trials,
    Allows "expedited" safety and efficacy testing for drugs, vaccines and medical devices,
    Eliminates current law that requires physicians to report gifts and other forms of compensation from drug, vaccine and medical devices.
    This bill is a disaster for consumers of medical care in the United States. You can read the bill here: https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/h...114hr34eah.pdf

    Unfortunately, HR 34, The 21st Century Cures Act, has been endorsed by Autism Speaks.


    Please share this message with friends and family and please post to social networks.
    Last edited by onawah; 8th December 2016 at 00:57.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  28. Link to Post #135
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Natural Immunity is Better Than Flu Vaccines – Top UCLA Researchers Claim…
    http://bolenreport.com/natural-immun...archers-claim/
    Quote
    Flu Vaccine – a Dangerous, Expensive Mistake?

    KP Stoller, MD www.Incurable-Me.com

    According to a new study, in the journal Science, exposure to wild influenza viruses during childhood gives people partial protection for the rest of their lives including against distantly related influenza viruses.

    This natural immunity provides this protection by coming down with the flu or being exposed to those with the flu. Natural immunity is different from getting a vaccine. Even the CDC will admit the antigenic response to a vaccine is not the same as immunity.080312-hongkongflu-hmed-11a-grid-6x2

    Scientists from UCLA and the University of Arizona analyzed data from all known human cases of two types of avian influenza and discovered that people born before 1968 are more susceptible to certain viruses, while people born during or after that year are more at risk for other strains of the flu.


    The viruses charted by the researchers were H5N1 and H7N9, which have the potential, with minor adaptation, to trigger a pandemic given there is some limited human-to-human transmission.

    Children and young adults are more likely to be infected with H5N1, while H7N9 affects older adults. Pre-existing immunity determined which strain one would be vulnerable or not vulnerable. The determining factor was what seasonal flu virus caused one’s first flu infection during childhood. Take note the operative word there is “infection” not vaccination.

    Imprinting to this childhood infection may not provide strong enough immunity to prevent subsequent infection altogether, but it substantially reduces the risk for severe disease, the study stated.

    The Dividing Line:

    The dividing line for the two age brackets, 1968, was the year of the so-called Hong Kong flu pandemic. Those born after 1968 are more likely to have protection against H7N9, which is more closely related to the virus that caused the Hong Kong flu pandemic, whereas those born before 1968 will have protection against H5N1.

    The researchers feel their findings challenge the current paradigm, where the entire population would be immunologically defenseless in a pandemic caused by a novel influenza virus. The revelation of this research and its unspoken importance is that it is natural immunity from getting the flu or being exposed to circulating flu virus that imprints this life-long immunity.

    No vaccine can cause this kind of life-long immunity.

    The obvious question is whether it is not better to allow people to naturally get the flu so they can have this life-long immunity.

    Is this research, unintended as it may be, a challenge to the current paradigm that the flu vaccine is the best option for preventing the flu? Especially given its equivocal effectiveness and its many undesirable adverno-science-cropd-x-matt-collins-sciamerse reactions, never mind the mercury and other nasty ingredients they contain, the flu vaccine seems to be a big failure.

    The mantra from the conventional medical community and the CDC is that the flu vaccine is still the best way to prevent the flu (even with its marginal to little efficacy).

    Not only may the flu vaccine not be the best way to prevent the flu but it seems to have a awful lot of unintended consequences.

    In 2010, Canadian health officials confirmed that school aged children and healthy young adults, who had gotten a flu shot the previous season, were at twice the risk of coming down with pandemic A swine flu in 2009 that was severe enough to require a trip to the doctor’s office.

    Is the Flu Vaccine a Medical Hoax?

    Clearly, not only are the major holes in our understanding of how vaccines work or don’t work, but the public is being subjected to, for all practical (evidence based) matters, what constitutes a medical hoax because the flu vaccine is a Billion dollar liability free business for Pharma. It is being pushed and mandated upon the population based on false and flawed research and poor efficacy – for MONEY!

    This is not right, ethical nor should it be legal. It certainly isn’t good medicine but first and foremost Medicine is a big business and the medical cartel, for lack of a better phrase, seems to be the enforcement arm of it corporate overlords.

    In my book Incurable Me, I go into some detail about the alternatives for dealing with the flu from high dose Vit D to EGCG (a component of green tea that interferes with the viruses ability to bind to our cells).

    It would seem that equipping the population on how to improve their immunity and benign methods for dealing with the flu might be far more effective in both the short and long term as an effective public health measure. But there is no money for Pharma in improving the public’s immunity using un-patentable interventions.

    But the drug Alinia, if you want an patented intervention, seems to be very effective in dealing with the flu. Why not pass out Alinia to the masses?


    Love them or hate them, vaccines punch holes in the immune system of most humans. For a few they are fatal. For many more they take far more than they give, but they do make money for Pharma, and that is the bottom line.

    The vaccination program and the paradigm that drives the urgent mandated need to get vaccines is about making money regardless of the need for the vaccine, or whether or not they even work as advertised. They are sold to use using fear propaganda and we allow ourselves to be talked into dangerous interventions when there are more effective alternatives.

    The unintended implications of this study hidden behind its innocuous title, “Potent protection against H5N1 and H7N9 influenza via childhood hemagglutinin imprinting,” is that it is natural immunity that provides life-long protection, and even if it isn’t a 100% guarantee of never coming down with the flu it is far better than anything a vaccine can provide.

    Is it time to re-educate the medical community?

    When it comes to infectious disease, maybe we need to re-educate the medical community about what the public really needs. We need the tools to take care of our own immune system without damaging it. We need robust immune systems and should we get sick, we need access to the research that has been around for years showing the very benign remedies we can utilize to fight infections so we can live to have life-long immunity.

    Ignorance is not science and it shouldn’t be policy either.

    If flu vaccination is not the best method for enhancing the public health then it needs to be terminated as a public health modality. Only public pressure will make that so.

    KP Stoller, MD www.Incurable-Me.com
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (12th December 2016), Hervé (9th December 2016), william r sanford72 (8th December 2016)

  30. Link to Post #136
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At It Again…
    Quote California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At It Again…

    Opinion by Karri Lewis AWAKE California

    Like a prize fighter intent on pleasing his sponsors, California State Senator and Medical Doctor, Richard Pan is back to his parental-rights-stealing-ways.

    Talk about Deja-Vu!

    14716268_10209567633421967_1641069469930967316_nAs if 2015’s Senate Bill 277; the stealing of parental rights for the right of pharmaceutical companies to forcibly inject poison into innocent school children (vaccinations), in exchange for Pharmaceutical Money and Vacations wasn’t enough; Senator Pan has set his sights on the State Ownership of ALL of California’s Children.
    Anyone noticing a theme here?

    Introduced by Senator Pan on December 5, 2016, this is where Senate Bill 18 comes into play.

    While the title of the bill seems innocuous, “Bill of Rights for Children and Youth in California,” this bill expands the California Bureaucracy’s endless control over your child.


    *Think* forced ADHD and Anti-Psychotic medications given in school or by your doctor without your consent or knowledge
    Gardakill death shots for all Jr. High School Students without your knowledge
    Forced electroshock treatments for children that are deemed problematic in or outside of school
    The legalization of corrupt judges sending your child to their “Kids for Cash programs”
    Child sex trafficking by CPS
    The possibilities for the state to abuse your child with Senate Bill 18 are absolutely Endless…all under the guise of children’s rights…

    Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan must be salivating.

    13072908_10208244872772809_3936190791686044453_o

    The text of Senate Bill 18 begins by acknowledging that there are already laws in place to protect California’s children’s rights:

    “Existing law provides for the care and welfare of children and youth in various contexts, including, but not limited to, child welfare services, foster care, health care, nutrition, homeless assistance, and education.”

    “Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 80 (Res. Ch. 101, Stats. 2009) declares the Legislature’s support of a Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California that resolves to invest in all children and youth in order to achieve specified goals to create an optimal environment for their healthy development.”

    But Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan would like to add:

    “This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to expand and codify the Bill of Rights for Children and Youth of California to establish a comprehensive framework that governs the rights of all children and youth in California, outlines the research-based essential needs of California’s children, and establishes standards relating to the health, safety, well-being, early childhood and educational opportunities, and familial supports necessary for all children to succeed. The bill would declare the intent of the Legislature, by January 1, 2022, to enact legislation for the purpose of ensuring that the Bill of Rights for Children and Youth of California, in its totality, is applied evenly, equitably, and appropriately to all children and youth across the state.”

    The full text of the bill can be found here.

    So basically, Senate Bill 18 allows the state of California to act on the behalf of any child, irregardless of parental and/or informed consent.

    Because your child will be given “rights” that allow the state to gain consent from your child for any “research-based” experiment that the State of California sees fit to inflict, parents will no longer have a way to protect their child from basic human rights abuses.

    Senate Bill 18 should be a BIG WAKE UP CALL to ALL Californians to take back their government and Stop the ABUSE of Children within the state.

    The corruption must be stopped and people like, Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan, must be ousted from office and replaced with moral, caring and constitutional-loving people. It really is time to DRAIN the SWAMP!

    Opinion by Karri Lewis AWAKE California
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  31. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (12th December 2016), Hervé (9th December 2016), marique3652 (10th December 2016)

  32. Link to Post #137
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Interview With Vaccine Choice Activist Christina Hildebrand
    Published on Dec 9, 2016

    Quote Interview with guest Christina Hildebrand, President of A Voice For Choice, Inc. Christina is passionate about ensuring people know what they are putting into their bodies – be it food, air, water or medications. For the past 12 years, Christina has spent many thousands of hours researching and sharing her knowledge within her local community. However, with the growth of the Big Ag and Big pHARMa’s influences on US politics, Christina realized that she needed to take this to a different level and educate the masses on their right to informed choice and transparency of what goes into their bodies.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  33. Link to Post #138
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Just WHO IS Sponsoring California State Senator Richard Pan’s Destruction of Parental Rights?
    Many live links to more info in the article here:

    http://bolenreport.com/just-who-is-s...enate-bill-18/
    Quote Part 2 in the developing, “California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At it Again…”

    Opinion By Karri Lewis AWAKE California

    As if hell bent on destroying the family unit; and enacting the state of California as guardian (sic) of ALL of the state’s children, Senator Richard Pan wasted no time in beginning another attack on parental rights.

    Senate Bill 18 is a parent’s worst nightmare come true.

    In a townhall event put on by Senator Richard Pan in June 2016, it was announced that James P. Steyer from Common Sense Media was co-hosting the, “Talk with Experts and Provide your Input on the Children’s Bill of Rights Legislation,” advertised event.

    Jim Steyer Common Sense Media
    Jim Steyer Common Sense Media
    The flyer with that information can be found here.

    This describes the non-profit, Common Sense Media’s mission statement according to Wikipedia:

    “Common Sense Media reviews thousands of movies, TV shows, music, video games, apps, web sites and books. Based on developmental criteria, the reviews provide guidance regarding each title’s age appropriateness, as well as a “content grid” that rates particular aspects of the title including educational value, violence, sex, gender messages and role models, and more. For each title, Common Sense Media indicates the age for which a title is either appropriate or most relevant. An overall five-star quality rating is also included, as are discussion questions to help families talk about their entertainment. In addition to Common Sense Media’s traditional rating system, they also offer a set of learning based ratings, which are designed to determine complex educational values.[7][10]

    Common Sense Media partners with a number of media companies that distribute the organization’s free content to more than 100 million homes in the United States. According to Common Sense Media’s website, the organization has content distribution contracts with Road Runner, TiVo, Yahoo!, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, DIRECTV, Disney, NBC Universal, Netflix, Best Buy, Google, AOL/Huffington Post, Fandango, Trend Micro, Verizon Foundation, Nickelodeon, Bing, Cox Communications, Kaleidescape, AT&T, and NCM.[11] The organization’s current rating system differs from the system used by the Motion Picture Association of America and the Entertainment Software Rating Board. It has received positive support from parents, and was singled out by US President Barack Obama as a model for using technology to empower parents.[12][13] Common Sense Media began allowing studios to use their ratings and endorsements in order to promote family-friendly movies in 2014. The first film to use the endorsement was Disney’s Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.[14]”

    Why on earth would Common Sense Media, a supposedly family friendly company, support the stealing of parental rights by the state of California via Senator Richard Pan?

    Back to that question in a second.


    “Pressing Issues Facing Children in Our Community: Children’s Bill of Rights and the Right Start Commission Report,” was the subject of Senator Richard Pan’s and Jim Steyer’s townhall meeting.

    The “Right Start Commission” was created by Common Sense Media that created the, “Pressing Issues Facing Children in Our Community: Children’s Bill of Rights and the Right Start Commission Report.”

    Got it? The “Right Start Commision” and Common Sense Media are one and the same.

    And why would Common Sense Media want to systematically destroy family bonds by supporting legislation that would give power over to the state of California to make ALL decisions about children’s Education, Healthcare, and Emotional well-being?

    Pan’s Senate Bill 18 is talking about standardizing education, healthcare and mental health for ALL California Children.

    Standardization means a one-size-fits-all approach to ALL children.

    Senate Bill 18 allows "professionals" approved by the state to make these decisions and more for your child.
    Senate Bill 18 allows “professionals” approved by the state to make these decisions and more for your child.
    No homeschooling, alternative healthcare, or non-state sanctioned mental health solutions will be allowed.

    The writing’s on the wall.

    Children will be at the mercy of their teachers and other outside professionals; including medical doctors, mental health professionals, CPS, judges and other authority figures deemed approved by the state.

    Medical Kidnap and CPS unnecessarily removing children from loving homes are already a problem in the state of California.

    “The harm of the widespread CPS practice of removing or threatening to remove children from non-offending parents extends far beyond the dangers and injustices to individual mothers and children. The harm extends to nearly every poor, immigrant, or minority race mother who is trying to deal with family violence. Most have heard first hand stories of CPS removing children from other mothers in their neighborhoods.“

    And the scary reality is that “human trafficking busts have turned up that large quantities of victims who are actually wards of the state — via CPS“

    This BEGS the question, why is Common Sense Media supporting such a communist agenda when it comes to families and their children?

    Before I begin to help answer some of these questions, please be aware that I’m of sound mind. I am also not suicidal and/or depressed.

    With that, let’s begin to take a look at the connections and people involved in the stripping away of parental rights.

    One needs look no further than, James (Jim) P. Steyer, the founder and CEO of the nonprofit, Common Sense Media.

    Jim Steyer is the brother of billionaire Tom Steyer.

    Tom Steyer Leftist Hedgefund Billionaire (younger brother of Jim Steyer)
    Tom Steyer Leftist Hedgefund Billionaire (younger brother of Jim Steyer)
    Both brothers are extremely well-connected, politically, within the Democratic Party.

    Learn more about the Steyer brothers here.

    Jim Steyer is allegedly named in the Hillary Clinton wikileaks email data dump, that some believe to be child rape evidence, including some branches of law enforcement. John Podesta was in direct contact with both Steyer brothers.

    Learn more about John Podesta here.

    The child sex trafficking and exploitation claims coming out of Washington D.C. are horrific.

    The New York Times, while calling it a “conspiracy,” does a great job in spelling out the details of the emails and the ensuing explanation.

    The article can be found here.

    Jim Steyer and his brother Tom, are BOTH named and connected to these allegations.

    The contents of wikileaks email messages are as follows:

    Re: Walnut sauce?ing

    From:jim@commonsense.org
    To: podesta.mary@gmail.com, john.podesta@gmail.com
    CC: tsteyer@fahrllc.com
    Date: 2015-04-11 20:28
    Subject: Re: Walnut sauce?ing

    Indeed, Mary. .

    I’m coming to town the week after next and will bring some walnuts!

    From: Mary Podesta [mailtoodesta.mary@gmail.com]
    Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 03:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
    To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>
    Cc: Tom Steyer; Jim Steyer
    Subject: Re: Walnut sauce?ing

    Walnut growing northern CA surely knows and celebrates walnut pasta sauce? Actually what surprises me is that we haven’t already served it to you.

    On Apr 11, 2015 3:51 PM, “John Podesta” <john.podesta@gmail.com<mailto:john.podesta@gmail. com>> wrote:

    It’s an amazing Ligurian dish made with crushed walnuts made into a paste. So stop being so California.

    JP
    –Sent from my iPad–
    john.podesta@gmail.com<mailto:john.podesta@gmail.c om>
    For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com<mailto:eryn.sepp@gmail.com>

    > On Apr 11, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Jim Steyer <jim@commonsense.org<mailto:jim@commonsense.org> > wrote:
    >
    > Hey John,
    >
    > We know you’re a true master of cuisine and we have appreciated that for years …
    >
    > But walnut sauce for the pasta? Mary, plz tell us the straight story, was the sauce actually very tasty?
    >
    > Love to all the Podestas from the Steyers! Cheers,
    >
    > Jim

    These are the people involved in the Washington D.C. pedophile investigation!

    This is unbelievable! Perverts and child molesters are sponsoring Senator Richard Pan’s Senate Bill 18!

    You just can’t make this stuff up!

    It’s starting to all make sense now.

    In Tim Bolen’s article, “Hillary Clinton PERSONALLY arranged For Chinese Vaccine Manufacturers to Avoid US Government Scrutiny,” (he) discloses how HRC pre-approved Chinese vaccine manufacturers through the World Health Organization to completely bypass ANY US Agency inspections.

    Obviously, the concern for the welfare of children is the furthest thing from California Senator Richard “the State Owns Your Child” Pan’s and his cronies’ mind.

    There is Indeed a theme here.

    Stay tuned California.

    Opinion By Karri Lewis
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (12th December 2016), Hervé (15th December 2016)

  35. Link to Post #139
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Communism, Common Sense, and What Senator Richard Pan Intends For California’s Children…

    Part 3 in the developing, “California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At it Again…”

    Opinion By Karri Lewis AWAKE California
    http://bolenreport.com/communism-com...nias-children/
    According to the US Supreme Court in the 1979 Parham Versus J.R Case



    Quote California Senator Richard Pan’s attack on Californian’s Parental Rights has morphed into an all out assault on family and religious rights – in complete defiance of the US Constitution.

    Senate Bill 18 is the culmination of all of a totalitarian socialist state’s hatred for liberty and freedom.

    Called a “Spot Bill,” Senate Bill 18 is, according to the California legislative analyst, “a bill that amends a code section in such an innocuous way as to be totally nonsubstantive. The bill has been introduced to assure that a germane vehicle will be available at a later date after the deadline has passed to introduce bills. At that future date, the bill can be amended with more substance included.”

    Senate Bill 18 is dangerous because it is made to look not harmful or offensive, so that it might pass easily.

    This bill is the FOUNDATION for the rules and regulations that Senator Richard Pan will add at a later date; most likely under the radar and away from the prying eyes of the public.

    Senator Pan currently sits on 17 different state committees, including the Children with Special Needs committee, which is ironic considering all of the additional vaccine injuries that his Senate Bill 277 has caused.

    Senator Pan has a lot of influence in Sacramento and with the other California Senators.

    Many believe that since Senator Pan has strong ties to Big Pharma that he intends to add MANY REQUIRED Medical Interventions for Children.


    Religious Freedom is NOT listed in the text of Pan’s Senate Bill 18 as a Guaranteed Right for children.

    If SB 18 becomes law no practicing Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, etc. child will be allowed to observe the practices of his or her religion, if these practices go against state-designed-and-approved indoctrination.

    Why isn’t a child’s religious freedom a guaranteed right?
    [IMG]http://i1.wp.com/bolenreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IMG_6600-e1481696205167.jpg?
    resize=768%2C277[/IMG]
    Apparently, the only religion allowed for California children will be the religion of the state… whatever that may be at the moment. Communism? Totalitarianism? Socialism?

    Communism, you will remember from learning days, includes state ownership of the people, including children.

    This SB 18 bill is just the first step towards a California totalitarian Communist State.

    Notice – Class Warfare is a Tool to Implement Communism; this includes Race Wars.
    It’s always easier to begin with the children.

    Speaking of beginning with children…

    Common Sense Media, the book censorship group, is sponsoring Senate Bill 18.

    Just what is the exact agenda of Common Sense Media? Let’s look…

    Their intent is to control what California students are taught.

    Common Sense Media is a strong supporter of Common Core, and much more. You can tell exactly what this group is by reviewing what they already support, and endorse.

    With Common Core Every child will be required to have the same education (socialist indoctrination), whether that is the ideal way for the child to learn or NOT.

    No Exceptions.

    What’s concerning about Common Sense Media is that on their website they promote and endorse, a supposedly safe and child-friendly website called Kidzworld. On the surface, this website appears to be a safe and kid-friendly environment.

    However, after reading quite a few parental reviews I found on the Common Sense Media website:

    Another horrifying picture begins to emerge:

    Parents’ reviews of Kidzworld are claiming that their children were solicited for sex. One parent alleged that her child was solicited to meet at McDonald’s for a sexual threesome on the Kidzworld website in a chat room. See below:

    According to another of the parental reviews, their children were allegedly told to commit suicide or cut themselves, if they did not accept friend requests for the chat rooms.

    Take a LOOK at these quotes from parents on the Common Sense Media website:

    1 star review: “Not Okay This website is not recommended at all. I let my 10 year old daughter use it and people chatted her horrible things when she rejected their friend requests. They threatened to kill her, kill themselves, etc. I made sure my daughter was off it immediately. There are probably crazy people there! I emailed the manager and reported the texts, but he only answered. “chill” I was annoyed. My daughter’s account have not been deleted. I blocked the website from her device, and I told all her friend’s parents to watch out for kidzworld. Stay away from this website to keep your child safe”

    2 star review: “Sexting 101 – My child insists it’s “role playing” but the conversations had with others of both sexes are very sexual in nature. There is no moderation that I can tell. I am disappointed that Common Sense Media would give this site such a good rating.”

    1 star review: “UNSAFE!!!!!!!!!! It’s obviously a dating site. I let my son play on there, and two girls asked him if he wanted to have sex. And MANY kids on there called him BAD names and try to convience him to go on drugs, smoke, and drinking &gt;. I am HIGHLY disappointed! Kidzworld should be on the top ten UNSAFEST sites ever! &gt;:c. Now my 7 year old is watching porn and became a pervert!!!!!!!!! THE MANAGER SHOULD BE ARRESTED!!!!

    1 star review: “PARENTS BEWARE! Within 3 hours of being on that website for the first time, my daughter was contacted by at least 3 adults who asked for photos of her legs in stockings, a miniskirt, etc. The website is a haven for predators and should be shut down.”

    1 star review: “Nope, never ever again. I let my 9 year old cousin try out this site 6 months ago. I set the privacy settings and everything. I let her chat, make friends, and told her if you see someone mean or inappropriate, report them or tell me. She agreed. A week or two later, I decided to be a bad cousin and look at her account. (I let her post 1 picture of herself which was a HUGE mistake…..) I saw all these comments on her profile saying “hey cutie” “wanna be my gf?” “lets have sex, meet at McDonalds?” I deleted all of these people, except for those she knew. Then I went on chat. Oh the chat! Language, sex talk, dating (these kids had “online” partners!), suicidal talk, and even more! I was starting to think these people LIED about their ages. A social network for kids 9-18? That’s not safe at all. I wouldn’t let my sisters, cousins, or future kids ever talk with someone online who’s 17! Especially someone they do not know. If you are thinking of choosing Kidzworld, I highly recommend you do NOT.”

    Those parent reviews, and more, can be found on the Common Sense Media website here.

    Common Sense Media’s mission of “We believe in sanity, not censorship,” takes on a whole new meaning with these parent reviews.

    So, let’s ask a question here. “Will pedophilia, inappropriate and perverted, behavior be forcibly accessible to EVERY child in the state of California via their Common Sense Media recommended school websites?

    Common Sense Media is pushing their website and content throughout the public schools.

    Common Sense Media was busy hiring parents and teachers, this past summer to help further their Senate Bill 18 agenda throughout the state. For details click here.

    Are these the kind of “rights” that California children will have, after Senate Bill 18 passes?

    Yikes!

    Stay tuned.

    Opinion By Karri Lewis AWAKE California
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (16th December 2016), Hervé (15th December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  37. Link to Post #140
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    13,646
    Thanks
    31,204
    Thanked 60,761 times in 12,131 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Bombshell: sacrificing children to the state of California: SB18 Dec
    15
    by Jon Rappoport
    Bombshell: Sacrificing children to the state of California: SB18

    Watch out for the big money behind this operation: it’s the secret

    By Jon Rappoporthttps://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/12/15/bombshell-sacrificing-children-to-the-state-of-california-sb18/

    Quote This article is dedicated to Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising, a book everyone should read. Yesterday.

    A bill introduced by the notorious Richard Pan, the mover and shaker behind the mandatory vaccination law in CA—this new one, SB18, is a grab-bag of generalities basically giving over care of children to the State.

    Catch the flavor of the wording. It emerges like swamp gas: “The Legislature finds and declares that all children and youth, regardless of gender, class, race, ethnicity, national origin, culture, religion, immigration status, sexual orientation, or ability, have inherent rights that entitle them to protection, special care, and assistance, including, but not limited to, the following: The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest. The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being. The right to live in a safe and healthy environment. The right to social and emotional well-being. The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development. The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood. The right to appropriate, quality health care.”

    As if all these outcomes could be delivered to children on a silver platter.

    And the State would make it so.

    This bill is basically setting up the population of California for state regulatory agencies to fill in the blanks later, to make specific controls out of the vague generalities in the bill. Get it?

    “Medical care and nutrition and parenting and education are what we say they are. We define and enforce, you obey.”

    SB18 is also an invitation to immigrants anywhere in the world who can get to California with their children, or will give birth to children after arriving: “Just be here and we’ll take care of you.”

    But let’s go to the money. In SB18, a group is referred to: the Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council. This Council has already written a children’s bill of rights, and SB18 is saying this is the model. This is the framework. This the pattern they’re following.

    That’s odd.

    Pay attention. This is where it becomes VERY interesting.

    The Peninsula Partnership is a group organized within the San Mateo County Office of Education. One piddling little California county education department.

    The Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council (PPLC) is composed of the San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools, the County Board of Supervisors and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.

    And now we hit pay dirt: THE SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION.

    Bam.

    It’s a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION. It runs 1800 philanthropic funds. Here are some of its corporate partners:

    Alexza Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell. Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund, “building and scaling social inventions.”

    For some reason, this huge Foundation is pushing a children’s bill of rights that is reflected in a new CA bill, SB18, that will eventually make the State the top-dog controlling force over all children in California.

    You can bet these corporate partners will reap profits. Beyond that, this is their version of a MASSIVE social engineering program. And that program is part of a technocratic movement to plan, format, and run the lives of the population from cradle to grave, because…

    The hi-tech scientists and engineers know best.

    It’s that stark.

    They should rule the future because they can plot and chart it out, based on their version (you weren’t consulted) of “greatest good for the greatest number.”

    The best place to start? THE CHILDREN.

    This is TECHNOCRACY INC. at work.

    This is what’s behind SB18, and none of the hi-tech giants see a problem at all. All they see is a “scientific” solution that’s best for everyone.

    They’re taking new steps and leading us into the promised land.

    This is the big picture, and it’s bigger than any election or political party. It’s THE PLANNED SOCIETY.

    It absolutely ignores your freedom or independent choice.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  38. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (16th December 2016), Hervé (15th December 2016), Tintin (18th August 2018), wegge (26th December 2016), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 25 FirstFirst 1 7 17 25 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts