Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

[uzn]

Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children:
http://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparat...S-children.php



Here is the PDF:

http://www.rescuepost.com/files/maws...al-science.pdf


[Edit: also see post # 216 for a summary, Hervé]

[Hervé]

This gem almost got thrown out with the bathwater:

Exclusive: mind-boggling FDA confession about the smallpox vaccine

By Jon Rappoport Aug 30 , 2017

The FDA has just released a statement (8/28) about its crackdown on a California company pushing an unapproved treatment for cancer patients: stem cells mixed with a smallpox vaccine.

But that’s not the big story. The big story is buried in the FDA press release. Here is the Agency’s statement:

“Serious health problems, including those that are life-threatening, can also occur in…people who…have problems with their heart or immune system if they become infected with the [smallpox] vaccine virus, either by being vaccinated or by being in close contact with a person who was vaccinated.”

The FDA states that those with certain prior health conditions who pick up the smallpox virus, as a result of vaccination, are at exceptionally high risk. AMONG THOSE PRIOR HEALTH CONDITIONS IS: “IMMUNE SYSTEM PROBLEMS.”

That simply means weak and compromised immune systems.

And yet…during the years 1966-1980, a massive smallpox eradication campaign was carried out in Africa, under the auspices of the World Health Organization. Roughly 100 million doses of the smallpox vaccine were given to Africans, MANY OF WHOM ALREADY HAD COMPROMISED IMMUNE SYSTEMS.

How much devastation was wrought by this vaccination campaign?

The World Health Organization, in 1980, celebrated the eradication of smallpox on the African continent—but was that what really happened?

Or was it this? The visible signs of smallpox receded, but people with already-compromised immune systems began dying in large numbers.

The FDA has just unwittingly implied what researchers have known for decades; the so-called smallpox eradication campaign in Africa was one of the most dangerous medical interventions in history.

In the late 1980s, a respected biologist with close knowledge of the Africa eradication campaign, told me, off the record, that after the World Health Organization celebrated their “victory,” they held a very secret meeting in Geneva.

At this meeting, it was decided that the smallpox vaccine they deployed in Africa would never be used again.

I asked him why.

Because it caused cases of smallpox, he said.

So the African eradication campaign had a double effect.

• In some people, the vaccine caused smallpox, which it was supposed to prevent.

• In others, who already had very weak immune systems, it wrought extreme devastation and death without giving the appearance of smallpox.

More lies, more widespread destruction from the vaccine establishment.

Jon Rappoport

[Hervé]

MD: I’ve seen cases of vaccine injury for 40 years

By Jon Rappoport Sep 4, 2017

Australian doctor exposes vaccine damage, stands up to government/media attacks.

Here is what he wrote.

In Australia, the noose is tightening around parents’ and children’s necks.

There is already a policy in place that denies certain government benefits to families who don’t vaccinate their kids. Now, there is legislation that would deny unvaccinated children enrollment in daycare and kindergarten.

But a grassroots rebellion is underway.

Australian MD John Piesse has stepped out of the shadows and reported his findings and research on vaccine damage. The government is investigating him. They may strip his license. The press is attacking him mercilessly.

He isn’t backing down.

His stance is certainly heroic, but remember that every doctor takes an oath to do no harm to his patients. Without question, there are many other doctors who know the truth, first-hand, about what vaccines really do. But they stay silent.

Some of these doctors don’t vaccinate their own children…but they continue to inject toxic chemicals and viruses into their young patients. That is a crime and betrayal of the first order.

Here, in full, is a letter Dr. Piesse recently wrote to The Age.

Read it.

Study it.

Understand it.

This isn’t the unhinged raving of a madman, as the press would have you believe.

This is basic truth that every parent should have and own:

“I have been encountering cases of vaccine injury for over 40 years. In June it was a happy, healthy nearly 5-year-old whose parents were required to put her on a catch-up schedule, in order to get her into kindergarten. She won’t be going to kinder. She’s in a wheel-chair, brain-damaged. Her life ruined. Then came a friend’s father who died after a flu vaccine, and last week a 4 year old boy, made autistic by a catch-up schedule.”

“In 1988, the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created. It has paid out over US$3.5 billion to the vaccine-injured. The NVICP was set up to protect vaccine manufacturers from ruinous costs of litigation by vaccine-damaged people. It was deemed preferable to have ‘unavoidably unsafe’ vaccines than no vaccines. Unfortunately the protection provided to vaccine manufacturers also reduced incentives to develop safer vaccines in USA.”

“Vaccines contain health-damaging ingredients, not the least aluminium – a known neurotoxin implicated along with mercury, in brain damage as in autism, developmental delay, ADHD, and learning difficulties. Aluminium is also a powerful promoter of auto-immune diseases. Vaccines can claim to be mercury-free if their mercury content is below a still-toxic threshold. Most influenza vaccines contain mercury – also a neurotoxin. In addition, polysorbate 80 in vaccines increases the permeability of the blood brain barrier and potentiates the risks of these neurotoxins. The known presence of carcinogenic viruses in the MMR vaccine, has been covered-up. Vaccines also contain formaldehyde, a known carcinogen.”

“Proof of vaccine safety requires rigorously conducted clinical studies comparing vaccinated versus truly unvaccinated children for health outcomes. Are there any such studies that confirm that vaccinated children are not worse-off than those unvaccinated? No. There are none. Hence, child vaccines are unproven for safety – an inconvenient truth for a profession that prides itself on being scientific.”

“One analysis indicated that national infant mortality rates were proportional to the number of vaccine doses (Miller NZ 2011), contradictory to the claim that ‘vaccination saves lives’.”

“From mid-2015, parents who wished not to vaccinate their children, started to converge on my practice seeking assistance with gaining exemption from the penalties directed at non-vaccinators by the No Jab No Pay and No Jab No Play Legislation.”

“Analysis up to the end of 2016 of parent’s reasons for not vaccinating, indicated that 64% of 166 parents knew of vaccine-damaged individuals in their own family. The study of ‘Adversomics’ confirms polymorphic and genomic susceptibility factors common to vaccine–damaged individuals and their families. (Poland GA 2015). 40% of unvaccinated children had pre-existing health problems that parents considered would make them more at risk of harm from vaccines. 60% of unvaccinated children were very healthy, but only 6% of the vaccinated children. There were no cases of autism in 212 unvaccinated children, but 8 autism cases in the 50 vaccinated children (16%), and 36% with ASD [autism spectrum disorder], compared to 1.4% in the unvaccinated.”

“As yet there are no large-scale vaccinated versus truly unvaccinated studies of the sort needed to prove that vaccines do or do not cause autism.”

“So where does the widespread belief that vaccines do not cause autism derive? In a nutshell: from an over-whelming quantity of ‘manufactured science’ of low quality, scientific fraud, and ignoring evidence supporting causality. Few doctors and politicians are aware of the pivotal scientific fraud committed in the US Centers for Disease Control. A study of the MMR vaccine in black American babies showed a 2.5 fold higher level of autism in babies given the MMR vaccine at 12 months of age compared to 3 years. The CDC refused to publish these findings but manipulated the data to disguise the undeniable association found. The fraudulent data was then published (DeStefano F 2004 ) and promoted as the final statement on the question. Thereafter the official line was that vaccination did not cause autism. 5000 vaccine-damaged children had their applications in the Vaccine Court for compensation quashed after this deception. But [CDC] whistle-blower William Thompson released the true unabridged data which was published briefly until pressure from the CDC forced its retraction (Hooker B 2014)”

“A recent study of home-school students showed a 6.6 fold increase in neurodevelopmental disorders in the vaccinated group over the unvaccinated. Autism spectrum disorders were 4.7 times more prevalent in the vaccinated children (Mawson AR 2017).”

“So long as doctors and governments continue to be hood-winked into believing that vaccines do not cause autism, no action will be taken to stop the alarming surge in the autism epidemic. A tragedy that need not happen if we demand good science and safe vaccines.”

Who is next?

Who is the next doctor to step into the light and tell the truth, regardless of the consequences?

“Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them…”

In this case, “Arms” means the truth. Because if it spreads far enough, from many doctors, there will be an end to the high mounds of intentional lies that compose official science, which is fake science—designed to put children under the gun, under the needle.

Jon Rappoport

[Hervé]

To my friends in Australia: the vaccine war deepens

by Jon Rappoport Sep 20 , 2017

The string of abuses laid on citizens of Australia by their government grows almost week by week.

Now, parental rights to raise children, without interference from the State, is under a new form of attack. This must be resisted.

Schools are bringing doctors on board, as a permanent feature. Young children will be subjected to medical diagnoses and treatment, without consent or approval from parents, even if those parents actively object. The State is stealing the role of guardian.

The Herald Sun reports. Read carefully:

“DOCTORS will have the power to treat students as young as 12 in schools even if parents refuse their consent.”

“GPs will consult at 100 Victoria high schools for up to one day a week as part of a $43.8 million program.”

“Guidelines released on Thursday show that even if a parent ‘expressly states’ that a doctor should not [examine] their child, the GP can if they deem the teen mature enough.”

“’Any student who wants to see the GP will be permitted to make an appointment,’ the policy said.”

“The GP will decide if the young person is mature enough to provide consent to any medical treatment for the prevailing issue.”

A young child “giving consent?” This is supposed to be “informed consent” when facing off with an adult doctor?

The handwriting is on the wall. Multiple vaccines will be given, to “bring children up to State standards.” This whole operation is, in fact, a front for forced vaccination. That’s the goal.

But it doesn’t stop there. The covert plan will eventually, if not sooner, include psychiatric diagnoses of so-called “mental disorders.” ADHD, clinical depression, bipolar, and so on. Followed by toxic drugs. Ritalin, Paxil, Zoloft, Prozac, Lithium. It’s a parade of toxicity.

I have demonstrated, over and over, that NONE of these so-called mental disorders are based on diagnostic lab tests. They’re pseudoscience.

I would be quite willing to show this and debate this with any Australian doctor or bureaucrat. Head to head, live on Skype.

Is that a challenge? You bet.

The whole medical takeover of parental roles in Australia is on the move. This is naked State force. Nothing less.

“Doctors in schools” is a wedge, a first step in the door, a first boot on the face.

The propaganda is:

“We doctors know best. We have the science. Parents are ignorant. We must protect the children. Public safety overrides parents raising their own children and making the important decisions.”

Get it?

See the picture?

The State is ripping away the natural right of parents to raise their own children.

It’s called a Medical Police State.

If you, as a parent, had some random doctor enter your house and demand to vaccinate, diagnose, and drug your children—and IF that doctor weren’t backed up by the State with all its coercive powers—if he were just a lone individual claiming he could do whatever he wanted to, to your children, you would throw him out without a moment’s hesitation.

Therefore, what we’re looking at here is force, that’s all. Not science, not freedom, not rights. Force. That’s the bottom line.

If some lone doctor, without force behind him, walked into your house and said he was going to inject your children with a neurotoxin called aluminum, and a toxin called formaldehyde, and a toxin called Polysorbate 80, and several germs—all standard components of vaccines—you would halt the proceeding immediately and investigate this ominous situation. You’d be crazy not to.

Where does all this stop?

I’ll tell you where. Nowhere. It doesn’t stop. Doctors, acting as agents for the State, are going to sink their hands into your lives deeper and deeper. Give an inch, they take a mile.

This is a war against you, your children, your family, and all families. This is what unchecked government does.

It says it cares, and then it wreaks destruction.

Do not let the long, long night descend.


Jon Rappoport

[Hervé]

Dr. Moss drops a bombshell to Senators regarding the vaccine-autism debate

Arjun Walia Collective Evolution
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:38 UTC

Earlier this year, Dr. Alvin H. Moss, a physician and professor in the Centre for Health Ethics & Law Department at West Virginia University, testified at the West Virginia Senate Education Committee on the topic of childhood vaccinations.

As most of you reading this probably already know, multiple countries and communities around the world are now implementing mandatory vaccination policies, which ensure that if a child has not received the full amount of recommended immunizations, they cannot attend public school. This is primarily due to the belief that if the majority of a population can become "immune" to a disease via vaccination, diseases will either be eradicated or at least kept under control. It's called "herd immunity," and refers to a pattern of immunity that should protect a population against invasion of a new infection. It's the backbone of pro-vaccine arguments, despite the fact that there is no science behind it, which is why it remains a theory. Measles is one example where the theory has shown to be false. Measles vaccine failures have been documented for a quarter of a century around the world, showing that we're not really looking at a failure to vaccinate, but rather a failing vaccine.

According to Dr. Lucija Tomljenovik, a post-doctoral research fellow in the Department of Opthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Colombia,

"The statement that high levels of vaccination prevent disease outbreaks is not as accurate as infectious diseases do in fact occur even in fully vaccinated populations as well as individuals."

We recently published an article regarding herd immunity, which is a completely separate topic from this article. If interested, you can click on the title below to read the article: Why Unvaccinated Children Are Not A Threat To Vaccinated Children & Seniors

The recent proposed and accepted bills to implement a mandatory vaccine schedule for children has created even more controversy within an already divisive issue.

The Hearing

During the hearing, Senator Mike Romano asked Dr. Moss, "Are you aware of a reputable peer-reviewed study that links childhood autism with immunizations?"

Dr. Moss replies "the answer is yes" and then goes on to state that he could lay his hands on over 100 that directly and indirectly look at this issue.

After that, Moss emphasizes a very important point: "If we really wanted to do justice to that issue, it would take us well over an hour, perhaps several days."

The Senator then goes on to ask again, "Has there been a statistically valid peer-reviewed study that links autism to childhood immunization?"

Dr. Moss states once more, "I believe the answer is yes."

The Senator then asks the same question, after trying to understand the difference between published peer-reviewed "medical articles" and studies.

Dr. Moss then drops a bombshell that was, and still is virtually unknown, by a large majority of the population:

I think we need to be fair, we need to talk about the article that is quoted most widely to say there is no relationship between autism and vaccines, that's an article that was in the 2004 issue of the journal Paediatrics, highly respected journal. The first author was Frank DeStefano, he was from the CDC, and the author in charge of the statistics for that study is William Thompson. You may or may not recall, it did make national news a couple of years ago, William Thompson is a senior at the CDC, he came out and he said "we committed fraud" with the publication of that article.

Senator Romano then deflects the point, which is hard to believe given the bombshell of a point Dr. Moss had just made regarding Dr. Thompson. It goes to show, despite the fact that the current science (much of which is still unknown to medical professionals and the population in general) is strong enough and speaks for itself to show that the science has, in fact, not settled the link between vaccines and autism, that there is a tremendous amount of scientific fraud that surrounds the approval of various "medicines," which, unfortunately, include vaccines. The ironic part about this is that they've been marketed to be life saving, as tools for the eradication of certain diseases. The mainstream media narrative has made people feel inferior or crazy for even questioning the efficacy of vaccines, and that includes most medical professionals, who themselves aren't really educated on the topic of vaccinations. They are simply given the science the pharmaceutical industry has paid for.

The autism question comes in towards the end of the hearing.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gDhv-MzHlHo

As the current Editor-In-Chief of the New England Medical Journal, Richard Horton, recently shared, because of conflicts of interest and industry ties, "more than half the (medical) literature could be false."

This story has been circling around since it emerged a few years ago. For example, below is another clip where Congressman Bill Posey also shares this story. The CDC scientists actually forwarded off their information to a number of people who could do something with it, since it was getting virtually no attention within the mainstream.

Posey read off the letter he received from Thompson:

"The [CDC] co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the [MMR vaccine] study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qxr-cv-JuI8

The study he and his co-author published in 2004 was, as mentioned above by Dr. Moss, the most commonly cited study used by the scientific community to debunk the controversy surrounding the MMR vaccine/autism link. (Destefano, et al. 2004)

The study concluded that "the evidence is now convincing that the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine does not cause autism or any particular subtypes of autism spectrum disorder."

Dr. Thompson admitted it was "the lowest point" in his career when he "went along with that paper." He went on to say that he and the other authors "didn't report significant findings" and that he is "completely ashamed" of what he did, that he was "complicit and went along with this," and regrets that he has "been a part of the problem." (source)(source)(source)

Quite remarkable, isn't it?

You would think this would receive mass media attention, but it didn't, and the story is still trying to make its way into the mainstream. It just goes to show how much power the elite truly has. If they want to silence a fact, it can be done with ease, regardless of how impactful or important it might be.

It's becoming increasingly difficult to get stories like the ones above out to the public, as Facebook has teamed up with other corporations, like Disney, to decide for us what is "fake news" and what isn't.

Why don't they just let us think for ourselves?

I think the answer is obvious.

[Hervé]

The Great Vaccine Con: Former pro-vaxer launches a shocking expose on how the vaccine industry has been involved in a large-scale medical fraud

australiannationalreview.com
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:24 UTC

Albert Einstein once said, "the world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything". Inspired to implement Einstein's ideals, educator and author of best-selling book What I Didn't Learn At School But Wish I had, Jamie McIntyre has launched a new book entitled The Great Vaccine Con.

McIntyre's book - The Great Vaccine Con is a shocking expose' on how the vaccine industry has been involved in a large-scale vaccine medical fraud. It also reveals the industry's desperate attempts to cover up millions of vaccine injuries and the trillions the industry will have to pay in the future as compensation.

McIntyre has challenged the pro-vax community to a $1million reward for anyone who can prove that vaccines are safe and effective, however, there have been no takers as of now.

The Great Vaccine Con shows without a shadow of doubt that vaccines are neither safe nor effective. The claim that vaccines are the greatest medical breakthrough of our time is nothing but a total con that's been concealed for decades from a public that is becoming less and less gullible and harder to convince.

For instance, the Australian government has introduced Nazi style policies such as "No Jab no pay and even no jab no play" to coerce and bribe lower economic families to risk their child's health and vaccinate them with dangerous and unproven vaccines.

It takes courage to expose an industry with powerful friends in both the Government and the media. However, McIntyre, like millions of others is fed up with the lies, propaganda and pseudoscience pushed by greedy pharmaceutical companies who won't hesitate to lie and deceive to sell their faulty vaccines.

Whether pro or anti vaccines, this is a book that must be read.

The Great Vaccine Con will open the minds of many and enrage others, but the author is someone who has put his money where his mouth is and no one yet has dared to take on his $1million challenge to prove that vaccines are safe and effective. Moreover, after reading this book, no one is ever likely to. Industry experts believe that thanks to this book, we are about to see a tipping point and finally the pharmaceutical companies and politicians will be held accountable for the "Great Vaccine Con."

In an interview with McIntyre, the author said, "As an educator and author, it's never my duty to tell anyone what to think - including what to think about vaccines.

"However, it is my duty to challenge you to think and that's what this book is designed to do. It's also designed to challenge politicians, journalists and doctors to think.

"As humans, we can be given the smallest evidence of something by authority and due to our social conditioning and social hypnosis we accept it often without question. Yet we have the audacity to question the over whelming evidence of an opposing view. That doesn't help a society evolve to higher levels but simply allows those with less than worthy intentions to manipulate and deceive the masses at will. It also allows them to enroll those the masses trust to do their dirty work and spread false science.

"I challenge you to not live on this planet and fall for such mass deception. You owe it to your family, your children, your country and humanity to seek the truth and to take a stand against those who wish to suppress the truth", said McIntyre.

To download the first 50 pages for free and acquire further information on the book, visit here

ANR Media is also the publisher of Australia's first vaccine magazine entitled Vaxxed Inc., which raises questions on the link between autism and vaccinations, Big Pharma's role and alleged corruption in promoting vaccines for profits, the side effects of some vaccines and case studies demonstrating how vaccinations have adversely impacted the health of innocent children and their families. Launched in September, the controversial magazine has already created a stir within the medical industry and some government officials. For more information and subscription details visit: vaxxedinc.com

The following quotes from doctors and experts from the medical industry illustrate the pressing need to question and debate the safety of vaccinations:

• "By Nov. 1, 2016, $3.5 billion had been awarded to more than 3,500 vaccine victims through the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) created under the 1986 NCVIA law." "When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses ... the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." - Dresden James

• "If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations." - Russell Blaylock, MD

• "Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection" - Dr Sabin, Developer of Polio vaccine

• "The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunisation.....There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease." - Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD

• "No batch of vaccine can be proved safe before it is given to children." - Dr. Leonard Scheele, Surgeon General

• "It is pathetic and ludicrous to say we ever vanquished smallpox with vaccines, when only 10% of the population was ever vaccinated." - Dr Glen Dettman

• "The decline in infectious diseases in developed countries had nothing to do with vaccinations, but with the decline in poverty and hunger." - Dr. Buchwald, MD

• "There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunisation of children does more harm than good." - Dr. J. Anthony Morris, Formerly Chief Vaccine Control Officer at the US Federal Drug Admin

• "I think that no person would permit anybody to get close to them with an inoculation if they would really know how they are made, what they carry, what has been lied to them about and what the real percent of danger is of contracting such a disease which is minimal." - Dr. Eva Snead
• "There is insufficient evidence to support routine vaccination of healthy persons of any age." - Paul Frame, MD, Journal of Family Practice

• "The evidence for indicting immunisations for SIDS is circumstantial, but compelling. However, the keepers of the keys to medical-research funds are not interested in searching this very important lead to the cause of an ongoing, and possibly preventable, tragedy. Anything that implies that immunisations are not the greatest medical advance in the history of public health is ignored or ridiculed. Can you imagine the economic and political import of discovering that immunisations are killing thousands of babies?" - Dr. William C. Douglass, MD

• "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome has been reported following the administration of DPT. The significance is unclear. 85% of SIDS cases occur in the period 1 through 6 months of age, with the peak incidence at age 2 to 4 months." (From the accompanying insert to Connaught Labs' DPT vaccine) - Jane Orient, MD
• "No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable...for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan

• "The only safe vaccine is one that is never used." - Dr. James A. Shannon, National Institutes of Health

[Hervé]

I Rolled My Eyes at Parents Who Said Vaccines Caused Their Kids’ Autism

by Thinking Moms' Revolution
Posted on February 3, 2015

This is not aimed at anyone in particular, so please don’t think it is. I am seeing this vaccine argument all over my newsfeed lately, and I have to put in my two cents.

If you’re pro-vaccine, I get where you’re coming from. Up until last year, I was right there with you. Some of my older friends might remember I used to joke about how stupid “the anti-vaccine movement” is. I used to mock them. I would roll my eyes at parents who claimed vaccines caused their kids’ autism. I figured they were understandably angry and full of grief, and looking for someone or something to blame for a mysterious disorder for which a cause cannot be found. I have two children with autism. I get it. And yet, “science” had “proven” that vaccines don’t cause autism. So I figured these paranoid nuts needed to let it go, and move along and find someone or something else to blame. After all, my own sons had only received a few vaccines as babies, before an out-of-state move and some other life circumstances disrupted our check-up schedules. I figured nah, vaccines didn’t cause their autism. They didn’t even get all that many.

For those who don’t know our story, here it is in a nutshell: I have two sons who were diagnosed with “profound and severe autism” at age two. Both of them. I was told they would possibly never talk, never be able to attend regular school with “regular” kids, and so on. It was not a case of a “quirky personality” or “maybe Aspergers” like some kids have. It was not poor parenting or lack of enough attention. It was severe, classic autism. The kind of autism parents have nightmares about their babies getting.

William

But after a long, hard road and a lot of work, my sons did learn to speak — not always perfectly, but they could communicate. They can, with help, attend regular school. I felt very very lucky.

Then last year, I was ordered to get William the TDaP vaccine. He would not be allowed to start sixth grade without it. For some reason I felt hesitant . . . I put off getting it. I had a weird feeling. But the school persisted and finally sent me a threatening notice. I couldn’t put it off any longer. I talked myself into it. I said, “Well, he’s made so much progress over the past few years. School did that for him! And he’s almost 12 now. What harm could come from vaccinating a 12-year-old? Even most of the anti-vaxxers claim that the problem is introducing too much “stuff” into immature immune systems. He’s almost 12. Okay. I’ll do it, so he can stay in school.” I didn’t qualify for the religious exemption, and I detest lying.

I took him to the doctor and got him the shot.

As we left the doctor’s office, he was crying uncontrollably and hitting himself. William never does this. He is normally my strong, stoic child. But I figured well, he’s autistic and he’s upset that I just let them jam a needle into him. He’ll calm down in a little while.

The fit lasted all night. And I began to notice that he couldn’t talk. All night. He would struggle to put together a basic sentence, the kind he had been saying for years, and he couldn’t get more than an isolated word out of his mouth.

I thought, “Man, he is really pissed about that needle. He’ll be better in the morning.”

William with his baby sister

He wasn’t. For several weeks his behavior at school deteriorated. My normally happy child was miserable. He couldn’t communicate any longer. He had lost precious years and years of learning to speak, and could now only mutter “hungry” or “bathroom.” He was frustrated, and I can’t even imagine the amount of grief he must have felt. For years he worked so hard to learn to speak in sentences, only to have all of that progress undone in a single moment. His voice, that he worked so hard to earn, was stolen.

It took him months to regain his speech. Really, I feel like it took the entire school year before he was speaking in his old way once again. I think the worst of it was over in a couple of months, but it was a long time before I heard long, complex sentences from him again.

Yep, this is the type of “vaccines caused my son to develop autism” story I used to roll my eyes at. I can’t prove it, and I knew if I reported it to the doctor I’d be mocked as a paranoid parent. I did nothing. Because I knew I made a horrible mistake that day, and I couldn’t undo it. I can’t sue, because the vaccine companies have legal immunity. I wouldn’t sue my doctor, because he did what I asked him to do. I can’t sue the school, because I could have lied and filled out the religious exemption form. There was nothing I could do, so I did nothing but watch my son struggle and wallow in my guilt and grief. I hate myself for putting him through it.

Emily and her son Cameron

But here’s one thing I can do. I can tell this story. Sorry, I know for most of you it’s “TLDR” (too long, didn’t read). But I’m telling it anyway.

I’ll never laugh at an anti-vaxxer ever again. I’m now one of you. I think it’s easy to dismiss the concerns of a parent when their 18-month-old, who barely talked anyway, has problems after a vaccine. But my son was nearly twelve years old. And talking in sentences. And his speech immediately stopped the afternoon he got his shot. You cannot tell me I imagined this.

Cameron won’t be getting that shot. I’m sorry that William had to be our family guinea pig. But Cameron will. not. be. getting. that. shot.

Believe me or not, I don’t care. Science has not proven to me that these vaccines are safe for everyone. You make whatever decision you want for your kids, but no one will ever again tell me what to do with mine.

~ Emily Davis Hall

[Hervé]

Australia vaccination; all doctors under the gun; minister of health keeps lying

by Jon Rappoport Nov 25, 2017

Welcome to the Australian state of Victoria, where the minister of health, Jill Hennessy, has just put all doctors under the gun.

Vaccinating every child has become so important to Hennessey, she’s declared that a doctor who writes an exemption will be ignored. In fact, that doctor, by implication, will be considered “rogue.”

He could have his license to practice stripped. He could be prosecuted. He could be denied a way to earn a living.

Instead, in order to allow a child an exemption from taking vaccines, evidence must be shown from some sort of medical registry. How this system will work is not clear.

What is clear: In violation of privacy, all children’s medical records and history will be recorded and made available to health/government authorities, who will then see whether there is a prior incident where a child has reacted badly to a vaccine, whether the child has an allergy to vaccine ingredients (such as chicken eggs), whether there is a history of adverse vaccine reactions in the child’s family.

The government, not the child’s doctor, will decide whether vaccination can be skipped or must take place.

And because the State is firmly and irretrievably pro-vaccine, despite evidence showing vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, you can see how this plan will work out. Like sheep, children will be led into the pen where the needles are waiting.

Doctors who stand up and say no to vaccination, for any reason, will be excommunicated.

So it is now time for doctors, singly, and in groups, to stand up and speak up. Their silence is collaboration.

The Crazz Files, one of the great Australian websites exposing vaccines, is now running a piece about Meryl Dorey, a brave and brilliant woman who is the head of AVN, “Australia’s national vaccine-safety consumer health lobby group…[Dorey] has called upon Jill Hennessy, Victoria’s Health Minister, to demonstrate that, “There are no risks in vaccinating your children”.

Dorey:

““I am asking the Minister to do voluntarily what she is forcing upon children – to take the entire vaccination schedule over the next 4 years, starting with the birth dose of Hepatitis B, and continuing on to the 4-year old dose of DTPa-IPV.”

“There are currently 41 vaccinations administered to children in Australia between birth and 4 years of age – more if you are of Aboriginal or Torres-Strait Islander descent. Ms Hennessy needs to take all of these vaccines and also receive an annual flu shot as recommended for all children over the age of 6 months to show her faith in the safety of this medical procedure.”

“The terms are as follows: Minister Hennessy must undergo a complete physical from an ACNEM-trained physician who will assess her health status, do a full analysis of her bloodwork and refer her for an MRI scan to show a baseline level of her overall condition so that any vaccine-injuries can be noted should they occur. These tests must be repeated at the conclusion of the 4-year period. A small amount of each vaccine vial is to be drawn out just prior to injection to be assessed at an independent laboratory [to make sure the vaccine is standard].”

I agree completely. Let Minister of Health Hennessy prove her point that all vaccines are safe and effective. Starting now.

No more beating around the bush making claims.

DO IT.

Take all the vaccines you claim are wonderful for children.

I say Hennessy knows nothing about vaccines. She’s a parrot, repeating what “experts” say based on what other “experts” say. That’s all.

And you doctors in Australia: why can’t you support this simple plan and demand Hennessy do what she wants children to do?

Or do you think it’s laughable and trivial that you once took an oath to do no harm?

Australia is a prime battleground. The country is rapidly devolving into a medical police state. At the same time, more people are speaking out against compulsory vaccines.

The time to tell and expose the truth is now.

By the way, Jill Hennessy should ask any “expert” to provide her with a well-done study proving that taking vaccines in combination, all at once, is safe.

I’m talking about a long-term double-blind study, with two large groups, tracking all participants for several years.

If she asks, she’ll be surprised. Such a study doesn’t exist.

But the medical establishment insists it knows this practice is perfectly safe.

That’s called fake scientific news.


Jon Rappoport

[Michelle Marie]

Posted by Hervé (here)
To my friends in Australia: the vaccine war deepens

by Jon Rappoport Sep 20 , 2017

The string of abuses laid on citizens of Australia by their government grows almost week by week.

Now, parental rights to raise children, without interference from the State, is under a new form of attack. This must be resisted.

Schools are bringing doctors on board, as a permanent feature. Young children will be subjected to medical diagnoses and treatment, without consent or approval from parents, even if those parents actively object. The State is stealing the role of guardian.

The Herald Sun reports. Read carefully:

“DOCTORS will have the power to treat students as young as 12 in schools even if parents refuse their consent.”

“GPs will consult at 100 Victoria high schools for up to one day a week as part of a $43.8 million program.”

“Guidelines released on Thursday show that even if a parent ‘expressly states’ that a doctor should not [examine] their child, the GP can if they deem the teen mature enough.”

“’Any student who wants to see the GP will be permitted to make an appointment,’ the policy said.”

“The GP will decide if the young person is mature enough to provide consent to any medical treatment for the prevailing issue.”

A young child “giving consent?” This is supposed to be “informed consent” when facing off with an adult doctor?

The handwriting is on the wall. Multiple vaccines will be given, to “bring children up to State standards.” This whole operation is, in fact, a front for forced vaccination. That’s the goal.

But it doesn’t stop there. The covert plan will eventually, if not sooner, include psychiatric diagnoses of so-called “mental disorders.” ADHD, clinical depression, bipolar, and so on. Followed by toxic drugs. Ritalin, Paxil, Zoloft, Prozac, Lithium. It’s a parade of toxicity.

I have demonstrated, over and over, that NONE of these so-called mental disorders are based on diagnostic lab tests. They’re pseudoscience.

I would be quite willing to show this and debate this with any Australian doctor or bureaucrat. Head to head, live on Skype.

Is that a challenge? You bet.

The whole medical takeover of parental roles in Australia is on the move. This is naked State force. Nothing less.

“Doctors in schools” is a wedge, a first step in the door, a first boot on the face.

The propaganda is:

“We doctors know best. We have the science. Parents are ignorant. We must protect the children. Public safety overrides parents raising their own children and making the important decisions.”

Get it?

See the picture?

The State is ripping away the natural right of parents to raise their own children.

It’s called a Medical Police State.

If you, as a parent, had some random doctor enter your house and demand to vaccinate, diagnose, and drug your children—and IF that doctor weren’t backed up by the State with all its coercive powers—if he were just a lone individual claiming he could do whatever he wanted to, to your children, you would throw him out without a moment’s hesitation.

Therefore, what we’re looking at here is force, that’s all. Not science, not freedom, not rights. Force. That’s the bottom line.

If some lone doctor, without force behind him, walked into your house and said he was going to inject your children with a neurotoxin called aluminum, and a toxin called formaldehyde, and a toxin called Polysorbate 80, and several germs—all standard components of vaccines—you would halt the proceeding immediately and investigate this ominous situation. You’d be crazy not to.

Where does all this stop?

I’ll tell you where. Nowhere. It doesn’t stop. Doctors, acting as agents for the State, are going to sink their hands into your lives deeper and deeper. Give an inch, they take a mile.

This is a war against you, your children, your family, and all families. This is what unchecked government does.

It says it cares, and then it wreaks destruction.

Do not let the long, long night descend.


Jon Rappoport

This is not just Australia. It's most likely global.

My experience as a teacher and watching the military industrial complex invade the schools has shown evidence to this very same thing in southern Oregon, U.S.A.

I've mention this before, but here I go again...it's not just vaccines, it's also psychotropic drugs. They are covertly usurping the rights of the parents in many ways. A student in my class (as a substitute where I used to teach full time), came up to me with a pass to go to the newly installed on campus medical facility, and said: Ms. Teacher, I'm going to tell them that I don't want to be on Prozac."

It's happening NOW, not in the future. They came in between 2010 and 2012.

Boycott schools. Do not send children there. Home school. Use online schools. SAVE the children. Parents, too!

MM

[Hervé]

After hundreds of thousands of Filipino kids are vaccinated, Sanofi admits dengue fever vaccine can cause...dengue fever

InterAksyon
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:05 UTC

A nurse shows vials of the dengue vaccine Dengvaxia, developed by French medical giant Sanofi Pasteur, at an elementary school in Manila. © AFP/Getty Images

Concerned over the health of close to some 500,000 schoolchildren administered with the vaccine Dengvaxia, Senator Richard J. Gordon has expressed alarm over reports that the manufacturer Sanofi has acknowledged its dengue vaccine poses risks to certain recipients.

In what many described as a major Aha! Moment, Sanofi disclosed Thursday that, "for individuals who have not been previously infected by dengue virus, vaccination should not be recommended."

The situation poses a big and deep quandary, especially for those responsible in the formulation and execution of this mass dengue vaccination program intended to cover one million children nine years old and up.

Early warning
Critics have noted the apparent haste that accompanied the Dengvaxia program's rollout. Senator Gordon, chairman of the Senate Committee on Accountability of Officers and Investigations, or Blue Ribbon, said an official of the World Health Organization (WHO) had earlier warned that, at the time it was procured by the administration of then President Benigno Aquino III, the vaccine had not received pre-qualification approval.

This means the vaccine was not yet ready for distribution, explained Senator Gordon. "Now we have the evidence on that."

Haphazard
For his part, Senator Joel Villanueva called for accountability from Sanofi as well as Department of Health officials responsible "for haphazardly allowing the vaccine to be administered without extensive due diligence on the effects and without waiting for the results of comprehensive clinical trial."

The senator also expressed his disappointment that Sanofi had only recently revealed the result of their clinical study, after the DOH had already spent more than PhP3 billion for the program.

Senator Gordon elaborated: "Before we conducted an investigation on the anomalous procurement of this vaccine, we talked to several health experts and they told us that they had already warned government long before about the possible adverse effect of the new drug on individuals with no prior history of dengue. With this admission by Sanofi, they have been proven right."

Sanofi acknowledgment
Sanofi acknowledged in the recent disclosure that the drug may be harmful when administered to individuals not previously infected with dengue, citing a new analysis of long-term clinical trial data that indicated that "for those not previously infected by dengue virus, more cases of severe disease could occur following vaccination upon a subsequent dengue infection."

In effect, what Sanofi is now saying is its dengue vaccine mostly helps people who'd been previously infected by the virus.

Sanofi urged regulators to update the vaccine's label so doctors can be guided in screening out patients who have never suffered dengue.

3 doses six months apart
Known in the technical nomenclature as CYD-TDV, Dengvaxia is what's called a "tetravalent, live attenuated, chimeric dengue vaccine in a yellow fever 17D backbone developed by Sanofi Pasteur." The schedule that has been evaluated in Phase III clinical trials includes 3 doses of vaccine (at 0, 6 and 12 months).

Total bill: PhP3.5B
In January 2016, then Health Secretary Dr. Janette Garin told the Philippine Star that DOH was spending a total of P3.5 billion for the vaccination program for public school students in areas with high incidence of the potentially fatal disease. The initial beneficiaries of the free dengue vaccine were nine-year-old children enrolled in government schools at the National Capital Region, Central Luzon, and Calabarzon.

Garin said DOH bought the Food and Drug Administration-licensed Dengvaxia, at PhP1,000 per dose. This amount included syringes, vaccine carriers, surveillance and monitoring, and implementation costs.

Three doses were procured for one million children, each successive dose to be given every six months. The school-based dengue immunization was launched in April last year.

A Philippine News Agency dispatch on that same day reported that Rep. Estrellita Suansing (1st District, Nueva Ecija) called for an inquiry, in aid of legislation, into the DOH's school-based immunization program to scrutinize, among others, research studies on the dengue vaccine's efficacy and safety, and determine if government standards of accountability and transparency have been followed.

WHO? No, not WHO
When critics aired misgivings about the lack of a recommendation from the World Health Organization's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) at the time, DOH Secretary Garin and, later, her successor Dr. Paulyn Jean B. Rosell-Ubial were to argue that there was no legal requirement to get a certification from the WHO.

Ubial elaborated that a WHO certification is required only for United Nations (UN) procurement agencies, such as UNICEF, UNDP, and the United Nations Population Fund.

While it does not fall under the purview of the WHO to approve vaccines, national regulatory authorities who have the power to license vaccines are expected to follow their own rigorous evaluations and approval processes on the basis of the quality, safety, and efficacy of the product.

Only for high endemicity
The World Health Organization's SAGE reviewed the evidence, and recommended that countries consider introduction of the vaccine "only in settings with high endemicity", or high incidence of dengue.

In a report on the study The Dengue Vaccine Dilemma: Balancing the Individual and Population Risks and Benefits it was noted that "CYD-TDV [Dengvaxia] vaccination immunologically primes seronegative recipients [those who have had no prior exposure], causing their first natural dengue infection to have higher severity ... vaccination in low-transmission settings with a high population of seronegatives will increase the number of hospitalized dengue cases."

The WHO recommendations have effectively split the dengue community into those that support and challenge them. Granted, wide deployment of Dengvaxia could result in considerable public health benefit, but what, then, of the seronegative individuals who were vaccinated and potentially become at increased risk for severe disease?

Dilemma of the 9-year olds
This is the dilemma now facing the possibly hundreds of thousands of our nine-year old public school pupils who received Dengvaxia but had never previously been sick of dengue.

Have they been placed at unnecessary risk by a well-meaning but "haphazardly" executed public health policy?

An article in the independent non-profit Break Dengue, Working towards a dengue-free Philippines: a look at the country's vaccination program, is an eye-opener. Janette Garin, the former secretary of the Health Department and the person responsible for kick starting the school-based immunization program, told the author Krizette Chu: "We started the program, during my time as Secretary of Health, because we see what a big difference the vaccine would have made if everybody had access to it.

"It's about making something available, easily accessible. Vaccines are mostly a prerogative of the rich, and the only time the government gave the public a vaccine program was if there was extra money ... If the government could afford it - and we could - why wait?

"The dengue vaccine could reduce the epidemic, and also help the Filipinos as it will relieve them of spending on hospitalization and buying the vaccine themselves."

Dr. Lyndon Lee Suy, at the time Director of Disease Prevention and Control Bureau at the DOH, articulated some of the serious challenges: "The timing of the introduction of the dengue vaccine - it was nearly vacation time when the government started the program; the looming election, which was due to happen in a month, and which meant a change in governance and health priorities and policies; and the most pressing issue of all - the lack of the World Health Organization's SAGE recommendation, which, while not necessary in introducing the vaccine, was used by opponents to question the introduction of Dengvaxia, leading to political vaccine resistance. (WHO has since endorsed it for use in the Philippines.)"

But wait, there's more: 158,000 kids in Cebu
In the not too distant past, just nearly one month back, more than 158,000 children aged nine to 14 in Cebu province were administered the first dose of the vaccine offered under the community-based dengue immunization program, according to the record from the Department of Health (DOH) Region 7 office.

DOH-Region 7 medical officer Dr. Shelbay Blanco told The Freeman news service that, during the initial screening, some children were found ineligible for vaccination due to such reasons as the child may be allergic to vaccines or had an allergic reaction to a prior dose, among others.

But, like the hundreds of thousand others who had already received the vaccine, they were not screened for whether or not they had contracted dengue before.

The latest word, so far
In the most recent version of a posted FAQ, this is what WHO has to say:

What are the preliminary results from the recent analysis of vaccine safety in persons seronegative to dengue prior to vaccination?

"While vaccinated trial participants overall had a reduced risk of virologically-confirmed severe dengue and hospitalizations due to dengue, the subset of trial participants who had not been exposed to dengue virus infection prior to vaccination had a higher risk of more severe dengue and hospitalizations due to dengue compared to unvaccinated participants, regardless of age. This increased risk was observed after an initial protective period and persisted over the observation period of up to 66 months post primary vaccination."

Scratching her head, one mother at a barangay health kiosk quipped that there's no turning back the clock now, "but how do you do right by the hundreds of thousand children who are dengue virgins but could suffer from a dengue attack made unnecessarily cruel by the vaccine?"

[Hervé]

Two huge current vaccine scandals the press isn’t covering

by Jon Rappoport Dec 13, 2017

The old question about a tree falling in the forest is relevant here. Does the tree make a sound if no one is there to hear it?

If a scandal erupts and the press doesn’t cover it, is it a scandal?

If this sounds strange, consider that, since the dawn of time, whatever has passed for mainstream news has substituted for the direct observation of events by humans. The press has functioned as the eyes and ears and even mouths of the public.

If someone tells you, “I am your eyes, trust me,” and then they fail, on purpose, to see something vital, where are you if you trust them? You’re blind.

Two giant vaccine scandals are in progress at the moment. The mainstream press is mentioning them, here and there, but without any intent to raise alarms, dig in, investigate, and get down to the core of what they mean.

The first scandal revolves around the flu vaccine for the current year. As I recently wrote, a new study has concluded the vaccine has a very low effectiveness rate. Why? Because the vaccine is produced using chicken eggs, and in that medium, the flu virus—which is intentionally placed in the eggs—mutates. Therefore, it isn’t the same virus which is causing flu this year.

FiercePharma reports:

“Based on data from Australia, which already had its flu season, scientists warn that this season’s flu shot might be only 10% effective. And the reason for such a low level of protection might lie in the method by which the majority of flu vaccines are made: in eggs.”

Ten percent effectiveness. Now that’s ridiculous. And it’s assuming you accept the whole model of how vaccines work—that they actually do protect (safely) against disease, rather than, at best, repressing the visible symptoms of the disease.

Amidst their spotty coverage of this scandal, here is what the press is failing to mention: the problem with the flu vaccine isn’t just a 2017 flaw.

It’s been the same problem ever since chicken eggs have been used to manufacture the vaccine.

Healthline.com:

“The majority of flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, a method of vaccine development that’s been used for 70 years.”

Hello? Anyone home?

Seventy years. The same problem.

The same “low effectiveness” problem.

That’s a page-one story with a giant headline. That’s the lead item on the nightly news. That’s a pounding investigative series about the lunatic promotion of a massively ineffective—but universally promoted—vaccine going back decades and decades.

But it isn’t a giant headline. It isn’t an investigation. It’s a here-today-gone-tomorrow piece. That’s all.

The second scandal is unfolding in the Philippines, where drug giant Sanofi’s Dengvaxia, given to prevent Dengue Fever, is facing enormous pushback from government officials, who have stopped the national vaccination campaign, after thousands of children have already received the shot.

The issue? Safety.

FiercePharma:

“The Philippines stopped vaccinations shortly after the company warned that Dengvaxia can cause more serious infections in those who previously hadn’t had exposure to the virus. The country also kicked off a probe and plans legal action, according to health secretary Francisco Duque.”

Did you get that? The company (Sanofi) itself warned that vaccine might not be safe.

FiercePharma:

“…the [Philippine] Department of Health didn’t heed warnings from an advisory group of doctors and pharmacologists, who concluded early last year that the vaccine’s safety and efficacy were unproven.”

My, my.

Let’s dig deeper. Sanofi is saying the vaccine might be dangerous for those who haven’t been exposed to the Dengue virus before getting the shot.

What on Earth does that mean?

It means a child who had come in contact with the virus would have developed his own antibodies to it. And later, those antibodies would protect him against the Dengue virus IN THE VACCINE. Otherwise, the virus in the vaccine could give him a case of Dengue or cause some other form of damage.

This is very much like saying, “If a child is ALREADY immune to Dengue Fever, because his immune system has successfully dealt with the virus, then the vaccine won’t damage him.”

And THAT is very much like saying, “If the child has naturally developed an immunity to Dengue, then the vaccine, WHICH HE DOESN’T NEED, won’t harm him.”

Of course, the press isn’t getting the picture. If any reporters are seeing the light, they’re keeping their mouths shut. The scandal is too big and too crazy.

Between the lines, a vaccine company is admitting their vaccine is only safe for children who don’t need it.

A tree just fell in the forest. Who heard it?

Jon Rappoport

[avid]

Share share share, thanks Herve

[onawah]

Everyone concerned about vaccine safety will want to see this and share.
RFK Jr.'s testimony is hard to refute, even among pro-vaccine camps.
Research demonstrates that just one vaccine had been killing 10X the number of kids than it had been saving from illness.
Would anyone notice if that was happening today?
RFK Jr.shows us why the answer is a RESOUNDING NO.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: "I'm the Chairman of the World Mercury Project and I made this video primer because in a dozen states across America today state legislatures and governors are considering passing vaccine mandates and the facts in this video are facts that every political leader who is trying to decide whether to vote for or against those mandates ought to understand."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=pFTLzmIciZM

[onawah]

Big Pharma’s control over the news 12/15/17
by Jon Rappoport

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...over-the-news/

Over the last 11 months, pharmaceutical companies have spent a stunning $3.2 billion on TV ads for drugs.

That much money buys you influence. It buys you control.

If a major network suddenly decided to set its hounds loose and investigate the overall devastating effects of medical drugs on the public, there would be hell to pay at the network. Drug companies wouldn’t stand for it.

Robert F Kennedy, Jr., whose film, Trace Amounts, about toxic mercury in vaccines, was getting no media coverage, made this comment:

“I talked to Roger Ailes [then CEO of FOX News], who I have known since I was 17 years old, he’s very sympathetic with this issue and saw the film Trace Amounts. I said to him, ‘I just want to go on one of your shows. Nobody will allow me to talk about this or debate me.’ He said to me, ‘I can’t allow you on any of them. I’d have to fire any of my hosts that allowed you on my station.’ Because he said, ‘My news division gets up to 70% of advertising revenues during non-election years from the pharmaceutical companies’.”

That’s called control.

There is a wider sphere to consider. Through octopus foundations like Rockefeller and Gates, for example, the medical/pharma agenda is part and parcel of the Globalist agenda. That is key. Gathering in the world population under the umbrella of “humanitarian health care” is a covert op of the highest order.

How can you control billions of people, erase national borders, destroy untold numbers of communities and their traditions, wage senseless wars, send millions of jobs out of industrial countries to Third World backwaters, and build a de facto global management system—unless you can also debilitate, weaken, confuse, toxify, and thus pacify those billions of people?

Accomplishing this is the work of the pharmaceutical empire.

I have produced, many times, open-source mainstream reviews of the death and damage numbers wrought by “Rockefeller medicine.” In the US, 106,000 deaths every year from government-approved medicines. In the US and Europe, 330,000 die, every year, from correctly prescribed drugs. 6.6 million hospitalizations occur. 80 million adverse effects occur. These are conservative estimates.

So…what is the likelihood that pharma-controlled mainstream news will dig deeply into the issue of Globalism, the major tyrannical movement of our time?

The likelihood is zero.

The influence of pharmaceutical interests on the news is, therefore, much greater than most people can fathom, in their wildest dreams.

Most people, when confronted with these pharmaceutical death-and-destruction reports, will immediately dismiss them as impossible. Others, who accept the reports, will claim the “unfortunate” facts show no intention to harm whatsoever.

However, the reports are public knowledge. They’ve been available to one and all. Government officials—and particularly, pharma princes—know the truth. And they’re doing nothing about it.

This is called a clue.

If you were in charge of a juggernaut operation that was causing this much horrific damage, and you knew it, would you stand by and let it keep happening? Would you foster the development of new drugs whose effects would only add to the ongoing tragedy? And would you exert such powerful control over major media that the truth could not be told?

I didn’t think so.

The pharma princes are not like you. You can’t see who they are if you look through the lens of your morality. They don’t share that morality. They don’t resemble you. Don’t ascribe your qualities to them. They don’t respond to life as you do. Their capacity for self-deception is awesome. Your good is not their good.

It is as if they were born freezing and never recovered. They come from an Ice Age and their blood is still cold.

They are rigid robots. Muscular truth can take them down.

[From Hervé: Also posted here: Big Pharma as Organized Crime ]

[CurEus]

these become free to watch occasionally. Quite good 9 hours or so of video interviews.


WHAT'S THE VISION BEHIND VACCINES REVEALED

YOU ASK?



PREMISE

There is no individual right superior to having domain over what substances may enter one’s body and no greater parental right than to determine what substances are introduced into the bodies of their children.

LOGIC

Premise 1: When it comes to vaccine risk, the only debate is the degree of risk that vaccines pose.
Premise 2: High-level, well credentialed experts disagree on the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Conclusion: Therefore, without government compulsion or intervention, parents should have the right to choose what, if any vaccines their children should receive and individuals should have the right to determine if they wish to be vaccinated.


STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

There is an urgent cultural problem where there exists extreme conflict, contention and confusion regarding one of the most significant and controversial health debates of our day, forced vaccination. This has resulted in an unacceptable situation where government regulators have violated the rights of parents in deciding whether or not they want to inject vaccine substances into their children.

Further, the rights of health care professionals to speak freely regarding their views of vaccines have been trampled on with the threat of ridicule, censure and de-licensure. Additionally, workers are being forced by their employers to subject themselves to vaccines and the media has attacked anyone who questions today’s compulsory use of vaccines.

Vaccines Revealed exists to be a beacon of light that shines uninhibited truth on this critical subject. By aggregating the world’s leading experts on vaccines into a global forum where unbiased knowledge can be freely shared, we endeavor to be a resource for millions of enlightened parents and concerned people worldwide who wish to evaluate this topic and form an independent opinion from which they can act in their own interest.


https://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/rep...5122aa0b4de569

[onawah]

HOLISTIC DOCTORS BEING KILLED? GCMAF AND NAGALASE (VACCINES AND AUTISM)
12/16/17 Forbidden Knowledge
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/hol...es-and-autism/

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oPv2tFEN5ss

In 2015, a pattern of poorly-explained deaths of holistic doctors began, spreading panic in this community. According to Erin Elizabeth of Health Nut News, the total number of unexpected deaths recently surpassed 80. The cases involving doctors who were studying GcMAF (Globulin component Macrophage Activating Factor) to treat patients with cancer and autism are seen to be the most significant.

What is GcMAF?

If you’ve had your blood work done in recent years, you may have noticed that your vitamin D level is a now being checked, along with cholesterol, blood sugar and liver enzymes. This is because low vitamin D is an indicator of low immunity and disease.

In healthy people, the immune system is regulated among other things by GcMAF, which is present in the blood and cell surfaces. It’s produced in the liver in a modification of the vitamin D-binding protein (the Gc protein). For this reason, GcMAF is sometimes referred to as “Vitamin D transport protein”.

Nagalase (aka N-acetyl-Galactosaminidase) is an enzyme that’s involved in sugar metabolism. Cancer cells and viruses excrete Nagalase into their hosts. Nagalase prevents the formation of GcMAF. Elevated levels of Nagalase are present in patients with cancer, autism, diabetes, immune disorders and in those with viral and bacterial infections.

Conversely, GcMAF has been shown in numerous scientific studies to lower serum Nagalase activity for a variety of cancer and HIV patients, with no adverse side effects. It is for this reason that some integrative medical doctors advocate the use of GcMAF and other non-toxic approaches to treating cancer and immune-related illnesses and it is why Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet conducted a study administering GcMAF to 40 young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), where it was shown to lower Nagalase to healthy levels in all but one patient. Dr. Bradstreet noted, “These initial observations give support to the notion that autism per se may be the consequence of treatable underlying pathophysiology. Given that ASD are now affecting more than 1% of US children, the observed response to GcMAF warrants urgent and further prospective evaluation.

“Although Nagalase is a non-specific marker believed to be derived from viral hemaglutinin, it may be useful as a biomarker of therapeutic significance in ASD, and as such also warrants further investigation. Regardless of any immediate clinical improvement, the reduction of Nagalase to more desirable levels is of potential benefit to these patients, since Nagalase is known to impair immune defenses.”

So how do young autism patients come to have high levels of Nagalase in their bodies? It’s been suggested that it’s somehow being introduced via vaccines, whose massively-increased schedule in recent decades has coincided with the sharp rise in cases of autism. While Nagalase is not known to be an additive or an adjuvant in vaccines it’s possible that its presence in vaccines is due to the antigenic viral envelope proteins used in vaccine production.

If Nagalase has been inadvertently introduced into the bodies of the youngest generations, causing autism and a host of new pathologies, the vaccine industry would be legally immune from any liability but bad press would still not be a good look.

As for the ability of GcMAF to neutralize Nagalase, Melissa Dykes wrote, “Cancer is big business in this country. We’re talking about a 124 billion dollar industry. A number that big is naturally a matter of ‘national security’. One of our country’s biggest products is cancer, so why anyone believes the system would ever allow a cure is beyond me.”

A religious man, Dr. Bradstreet was found dead of a gunshot wound to the chest in the Rocky Broad River in Chimney Rock, North Carolina on June 19, 2015, three days after the FDA raided one of his offices in Georgia, in search of all documents related to his work with GcMAF. The local police quickly called it a suicide and the Mainstream Media described him as a quack while his family cried foul. A videotaped presentation he gave at a conference weeks prior to his death did not suggest anything other than that he was a strong-minded, successful man. A further investigation crowdfunded by his family found that the angle of the gunshot could not have been self-inflicted.

The work of Dr. Bradstreet continues with his colleague, Dr. Marco Ruggiero in Switzerland, who has developed a way to deliver GcMAF through a probiotic culture used to make homemade yogurt.

[FreeURmind]

https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr...accine-damage/

Canadian Doctor Andrew Moulden.

He could map the face and show the damage of vaccinations. Our eyes are symmetrical when born. After vaccinations they are not. He found they cause mini strokes in the brain and also linked them to auto immune diseases later in life.

He was killed before releasing the holy grail of his research to prove vaccinations cause damage. Or he died. I guess it's up to the person to question it.

Very very detailed research. The man was a genius.

Love the passion for this topic❣Keep fighting the good fight❣

Prayers for all that have been affected. May the peoples and doctors voices be heard.

[East Sun]

Sorry if I derailed this thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Hervé]

One FDA scientist could end the autism epidemic

J..B. Handley Jr. Medium
Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:53 UTC

One guy could end all the madness. Really.

In a brand new published study, the only science vouching for the "safety" of injected aluminum adjuvant has come under extreme criticism by heavyweight scientists. Dr. Robert J. Mitkus - author of the misleading aluminum safety study from 2011 - could change the autism debate forever by telling the truth.

BY J.B. Handley January 5, 2018

While you were (hopefully) enjoying the winter holidays, a study was published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry (it went online on December 27th) that could change the autism debate permanently. In fact, this new study placed the burden of proof for the safety of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines so squarely on the shoulders of a lone FDA scientist - Dr. Robert J. Mitkus - that he alone could permanently change the outcome of the autism debate. Forever.

Aluminum science is moving at light speed
Science moves at a glacial pace. By scientific standards, what has been learned about the aluminum adjuvant from vaccines in just the past few years has been genuinely revolutionary, and should scare the daylights out of every parent on the planet. Mystifyingly, the first time ANYONE decided to test the impact, biologically, of aluminum adjuvant was 2007, where it was pioneered by Dr. Christopher Shaw at the University of British Columbia. I'll let him explain:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HK-93SHnTFk

It's hard to put Dr. Shaw's work in proper context. Our public health officials, signing off on a massive growth in the number of vaccines given to children, and therefore massive growth in the amount of injected aluminum, had never conducted biological studies to assess the safety of aluminum, which allowed Dr. Shaw to do something groundbreaking in 2007.

It also raises an obvious question: what have our regulatory agencies been relying upon to assess the safety of injected aluminum?

The answer: a single study published in 2011 by Dr. Robert J. Mitkus in the journal Vaccine.

About Dr. Mitkus
Dr. Robert J. Mitkus is a Computational Toxicologist in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA. He's held that position since 2010. He's also an adjunct professor in the School of Public Health at the University of Maryland. Previously, Dr. Mitkus was a "Mammalian Toxicologist" for the EPA, he received a Ph.D. in Toxicology from the University of Maryland in 2004.

Dr. Mitkus' published study, "Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination" from 2011 is the Gold standard and the primary document the FDA relies upon to declare injected aluminum safe for use in infants. It is, quite literally, the SOLE defense the FDA and CDC cite for any concerns raised about injected aluminum. In fact, Dr. Mitkus' study was in part a response to safety concerns about aluminum, as he writes in the Abstract of his study:

"Because concerns have been expressed by the public that aluminum in vaccines may pose a risk to infants, we developed an up-to-date analysis of the safety of aluminum adjuvants."

As you can guess, Dr. Mitkus' paper gave aluminum the "all clear" sign.

"...for infants, our study demonstrates that there is little risk for aluminum toxicity following immunizations administered according to ACIP recommendations even with maximal exposures to aluminum adjuvant. For the general population of infants, who receive less than the maximal dose, the risk is even lower."

To the layperson, this study would probably be reassuring. To scientists who are closely studying the issue of injected aluminum adjuvant, and particularly to scientists who are doing their own biological studies of aluminum adjuvant, Dr. Mitkus' study is somewhere between a professional disgrace and a fraudulent disaster, but I'll let them explain.

Aluminum: A Primer
Recent science, completed all over the world, is pointing the finger at aluminum adjuvant injected into newborns as the probable cause of autism. Here's a simple graphic to explain what has been learned:

© Vaccine Papers

I have written extensively about this topic, most recently just a few weeks ago, right here.

In a nutshell, scientists all over the world have learned the following about aluminum adjuvant, most of it since 2010 (not a single one of these new discoveries or published studies was considered in Dr. Mitkus' paper).

1. From Canada, 2012: "Aluminum (Al) is highly neurotoxic and has been shown to impair both prenatal and postnatal brain development in humans and experimental animals."
2. From France, 2013 : "However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier..."
3. From France, 2015: "Thus alum and other poorly biodegradable materials taken up at the periphery by phagocytes circulate in the lymphatic and blood circulation and can enter the brain using a Trojan horse mechanism similar to that used by infectious particles. Previous experiments have shown that alum administration can cause CNS dysfunction and damage, casting doubts on the exact level of alum safety."
4. From France, 2016: "We conclude that Alhydrogel [aluminum adjuvant] injected at low dose in mouse muscle may selectively induce long-term Al cerebral accumulation and neurotoxic effects."
5. From England, 2017: "The amount of aluminum in the brain tissue was, I would say, extraordinarily high. Very high. My group has measured the aluminum content of probably more than one hundred human brains, and these brain tissues taken from the individuals with a diagnosis of autism were some of the highest we've measured bar none. The only ones we've seen that are similar were a recent study of familial Alzheimer's. This in itself is a very important finding."

So, versus ten years ago, scientists now know that aluminum adjuvant, when injected, can

1) impair brain development,

2) remain in the brain much longer than thought,

3) is brought into the brain by macrophages that grab the aluminum from the vaccine injection site and recirculate it,

4) may actually be worse when injected in small doses repeatedly (like it's done during vaccination), and

5) there's remarkably high levels of aluminum in the brains of people diagnosed with autism.

Dr. Chris Exley, the author of this most recent study (#5, and the subject of my recent article) was so moved by the results of his study he said the following:

"I did not see a role for aluminum in autism. And I didn't see a role for aluminum in vaccines in autism. I have to change my mind now on both of these. I have to change my mind that aluminum has a role in autism, I believe it now does. Now, because I have seen the same cells that we will see at an injection site carrying a cargo of aluminum into the brain tissue of individuals who died with autism I would now say that we have to think very carefully about who receives a vaccine that includes an aluminum adjuvant. We need to think carefully, is this vaccine a life-saving vaccine or not? If it isn't, don't have it with an aluminum adjuvant."

That's Dr. Chris Exley. He's arguably the world's leading expert on aluminum neurotoxicology. He just said he'd shy away from any vaccines containing aluminum. He now also believes "aluminum has a role in autism." These are revolutionary things for scientists to be saying, and they're being said by the leading scientists in their field.

One of the other leading aluminum scientists, Dr. Romain Gherardi, went on T.V. in France recently to talk about his work, the work that found vaccine aluminum showing up in the brain, and staying there. He was a lead or co-author of all three of the papers from France I cited above. Just listen:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Syabv4Vsrpg

I wanted you to get a feel for Drs. Gherardi and Exley, and to hear from them directly. I want you to understand that these are two of the leading aluminum scientists in the world. I need you to appreciate the "weight" of their words, because then my comment makes more sense:

If science were pro wrestling, then Drs. Gherardi and Exley just body-slammed Dr. Robert Mitkus and his 2011 study so badly, he may never get up off the canvas.

Dr. Mitkus' Paper - scientists are "empty handed"
What would be lost on the average layperson trying to make some sense of Dr. Mitkus' work is the reality that the only biological science Dr. Mitkus considered in making his safety assessment was a single study that infused (rather than injected) aluminum citrate (rather than aluminum hydroxide) into adults (rather than babies). At least Mitkus acknowledges this difference in the paper, noting

"The determinations of the kinetics of aluminum retention by Priest were based on experiments where human volunteers were given an intravenous injection of aluminum citrate. For vaccines, the injection is intramuscular, the aluminum is in an insoluble form (e.g., as the phosphate or hydroxide of aluminum), and muscle at the site of injection is considered to be a storage depot for aluminum."

It's hard to put this seemingly minor detail in proper context:

In no other drug on the planet (except for vaccines) would safety standards ever be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered in the proper way (intramuscular injection), into the proper patient population (infants). Of course, we now know that doing so has triggered devastating results (just ask Dr. Shaw, above).

Vaccine Papers, an excellent resource on this topic, provides some additional perspective on Dr. Mitkus' study, citing one of its "fatal flaws":

"The MRL [minimal risk level for aluminum] is derived from feeding experiments with aluminum salts, not experiments with injected aluminum adjuvant. The safety of injected aluminum adjuvant must be determined from experiments with injected aluminum adjuvant (insoluble and persistent), not ingested, water-soluble aluminum. Scientific studies have established that injected aluminum adjuvant has unique toxic properties and ways of moving around the body ("kinetics") that are not the same as ingested water-soluble aluminum."

And, Vaccine Papers provides a final refutation:

"Mitkus 2011 is the best scientific evidence vaccine promoters have for defending Al adjuvant safety. It is fatally flawed and incredibly bad. It is not based on any toxicity experiments with actual Al adjuvant. It ignores key studies that contradict the assumptions it is based on. And yet, government agencies (FDA, CDC) and vaccine promoters cite it as powerful and conclusive evidence of safety. Aluminum adjuvant nanoparticles are very different from dissolved aluminum ions. Consequently, the only scientifically-valid way to establish the safety of injected aluminum adjuvant, is by experiments with injected aluminum adjuvant. Studies of ingested, soluble aluminum salts cannot establish the safety of Al adjuvant. Models of only dissolved aluminum cannot be used to determine the toxicity of the particles. Ignoring the toxicity of Al adjuvant particles is scientifically indefensible. Why do the vaccine promoters rely on oral-ingestion studies to defend Al adjuvant safety? It is because they have no experimental research showing that injecting Al adjuvant is safe! They are empty-handed."

In 2016, Neil Miller published a study in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons called "Aluminum in childhood vaccines is unsafe" where he too disassembled Dr. Mitkus' study, stating it had "major flaws" including the fact that Dr. Mitkus studied "dietary aluminum fed to mice" and reiterated that, "to determine the safety of injected aluminum, scientists must conduct experiments with injected - not ingested - aluminum." Miller concluded:

"Aluminum adjuvants are added to several vaccines to elicit a more robust immune response and increase vaccine efficacy. Infants and young children throughout the world receive high quantities of aluminum from multiple inoculations. Incremental changes to the vaccination schedule during the past several years significantly increased the quantity of aluminum in childhood shots. Numerous studies provide compelling evidence that injected aluminum can be detrimental to health. Aluminum is capable of remaining in cells long after vaccination and may cause neurologic and autoimmune disorders. During early development, the child's brain is more susceptible to toxins and the kidneys are less able to eliminate them. Thus, children have a greater risk than adults of adverse reactions to aluminum in vaccines."

The Body-Slam: "Critical analysis of reference studies on the toxicokinetics of aluminum-based adjuvants"
Just one week ago, this highly critical study of the safety standards used for vaccine aluminum adjuvant was published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. The study, "Critical analysis of reference studies on the toxicokinetics of aluminum-based adjuvants" addressed the limitations of studies relied upon, in particular Dr. Mitkus' study, by both the FDA and the CDC, to declare vaccine aluminum "safe" to be injected into children. The study authors included the aforementioned Dr. Romain Gherardi, and Dr. Chris Exley. They explained:

"To date, aluminum adjuvants per se have, perhaps surprisingly, not been the subject of any official experimental investigation, and this being in spite of the well-established neurotoxicity of aluminum."

The study authors also mention a laundry list of countries who have produced studies implicating aluminum-containing vaccines in chronic illness:

"The occurrence of myalgia and arthralgia, chronic fatigue and neurological disorders following multiple injections of aluminum-containing vaccines against hepatitis B, tetanus and human papilloma virus (HPV) has been reported in many countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Portugal, and USA."

The study authors made many of the same criticisms of Dr. Mitkus' work that I have shared with you above from Vaccine Papers and Neil Miller. But, they did so in a prestigious journal, and they did so with the weight of their collective backgrounds. It would be a bit like Warren Buffet telling you that your business is a poor investment. The gist of their paper? None of the studies done to date on aluminum safety would properly answer if aluminum is in fact safe. (Remember, in all cases, the study authors of this paper have done their own biological studies of aluminum adjuvant, and found it to be highly neurotoxic.) Their conclusion:

"Both paucity and serious weaknesses of reference studies strongly suggest that novel experimental studies of Al adjuvants toxicokinetics should be performed on the long-term, including both neonatal and adult exposures, to ensure their safety and restore population confidence in Al-containing vaccines."

Words like "paucity" and "serious weaknesses" are not words you want to hear when you are the CDC or the FDA, certifying that something is safe when it appears that's not remotely true. Dr. Mitkus, are you listening?


The "Big 6" of aluminum science have stepped forward, changing everything
At great potential cost to their careers, it appears that six scientists - none American - have stepped forward to sound the alarm loudly about the extreme danger of aluminum, and perhaps initiate a reckoning of the true cause of the autism epidemic once and for all. Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University; Drs. Romain Gherardi and Guillemette Crepea of Université Paris Est Créteil; Drs. Christopher Shaw and Lucija Tomljenovic of the University of British Columbia; and Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld of Tel Aviv University have all contributed to the understanding we now have of aluminum, and the way it appears uniquely able to trigger immune activation events in the brains of certain children, leading to autism. Looking at some of their quotes collectively will help you appreciate how bold their statements really are. This new scientific understanding of aluminum changes everything. For me personally, I feel like I finally have a plausible explanation for what happened to my son.

"Now, because I have seen the same cells that we will see at an injection site carrying a cargo of aluminum into the brain tissue of individuals who died with autism I would now say that we have to think very carefully about who receives a vaccine that includes an aluminum adjuvant. We need to think carefully, is this vaccine a life-saving vaccine or not? If it isn't, don't have it with an aluminum adjuvant." - Dr. Chris Exley, Keele University (England), 2017

"Concerns about its [alum's] safety emerged following recognition of its unexpectedly long-lasting biopersistence within immune cells in some individuals, and reports of chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive dysfunction, myalgia, dysautonomia and autoimmune/inflammatory features temporally linked to multiple Al-containing vaccine administrations...In the context of massive development of vaccine-based strategies worldwide, the present study may suggest that aluminium adjuvant toxicokinetics and safety require reevaluation." - Dr. Guillemette Crépeaux, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (France), 2016

"Thus alum and other poorly biodegradable materials taken up at the periphery by phagocytes circulate in the lymphatic and blood circulation and can enter the brain using a Trojan horse mechanism similar to that used by infectious particles. Previous experiments have shown that alum administration can cause CNS [central nervous system] dysfunction and damage, casting doubts on the exact level of alum safety."- Dr. Romain K. Gherardi, Université Paris-Est Créteil (France), 2015

"...it is somewhat surprising to find that in spite of over 80 years of use, the safety of Al adjuvants continues to rest on assumptions rather than scientific evidence. For example, nothing is known about the toxicology and pharmacokinetics of Al adjuvants in infants and children...Yet, in spite of these observations children continue regularly to be exposed to much higher levels of Al adjuvants than adults, via routine childhood vaccination programmes." - Dr. Chris Shaw, University of British Columbia (Canada), 2012

"continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier." - Dr. Romain Gherardi, Université Paris-Est Créteil (France), 2013

"Experimental research has showed that alum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. Thus, efforts should be put in clarifying the potential threat of alum-containing vaccines."- Dr. Yehuda Shoefeld, Tel-Aviv University (Israel), 2013

"The problem with vaccine- derived aluminum is really twofold: It drives the immune response even in the absence of a viral or bacterial threat and it can make its way into the central nervous system. It is not really a matter of much debate that aluminum in various forms can be neurotoxic."
- Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, University of British Columbia (Canada), 2013

What can Dr. Robert J. Mitkus do?
I firmly believe that Dr. Robert J. Mitkus, a federal employee of the FDA, can help unravel the autism mess. All he needs to do is tell the truth. He needs to admit that these scientists are right, that the paper being relied upon to vouch for the safety of injected aluminum that he wrote in 2011 is inadequate, in light of much more recent science about aluminum adjuvant, and that the regulatory agencies need to heed the warnings of these scientists, as they explained so eloquently in their recently published paper. It's time for honest scientists to step up and do the right thing.

Addendum:
Please find two slides developed by the website Vaccine Papers that help explain the aluminum-autism connection, you can get your own copy right HERE.

(click on picture for larger version)


Second page: link

And another video from Professor Exley back in 2011 discussing aluminum toxicity:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xleocy6karo

[norman]

A short pep talk in between the heavy posts

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=KkPY03ugNXs

The Sacred Plant
Uploaded on 8 Jan 2018



Register for Ty's docuseries for free here: http://bit.ly/2DbuMzh

Are vaccines really safe and beneficial? Are they dangerous? Is the truth somewhere in between?

In this interview, John Malanca asks health researcher Ty Bollinger some hard questions. You’ll want to hear the answers.

We can all agree that we just want our children to be safe, and that we don’t want to take chances with their health. Vaccine safety is a topic every parent, grandparent and even every person needs to be informed and educated about

-- pros and cons --

in order to make the best possible decision for your family and for your life. Sign up free here to watch the 7-part docuseries The Truth About Vaccines, starting January 25, 2018: http://bit.ly/2DbuMzh