+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 24 FirstFirst 1 6 16 24 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 477

Thread: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

  1. Link to Post #101
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,931
    Thanks
    27,040
    Thanked 20,759 times in 3,642 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Any member who still thinks vaccines are good for us, please listen to a brief history of where the vaccine phenomenon started, in 1955 with the Salk Vaccine. This will enlighten your consciousness:

    Please move the timer over to 00:32:30, and listen to 00:37:00. The entire video is worth listening to, for those with the fortitude to do the research. You may not believe the revelations.


    BTW: Jim Marrs calls those individuals who are pushing the vaccine agenda, "Vaccine Junkies", in his latest video.

    This information is a paradigm changer. We learn that the Polio vaccine is actually responsible for tens of thousands of deaths over the course of the decades since it was administered due to virally spawned heart attacks. . Much like AIDS is viewed as having started in monkees we find that the Polio vaccine was devoloped through utilizing monkee physiology and that while the vaccine was developed and administered monkee tissue contaminated with this heart attack causing virus was inadverdently injected into people along with the polio vaccine.
    The slow incubation of AIDS has caused not a few people to wonder if possibly this is also where AIDS came from.
    Probably not though. More than likely the powers that be saw what happened with the Polio vaccine and realized this accident could be repeated along a different route and as such this was how they purposely introduced AIDS into the population.


    This information is a must!

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Curious77 (15th April 2016), Ewan (8th April 2016), gnostic9 (15th April 2016), lake (14th November 2016), onawah (8th April 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), william r sanford72 (14th September 2016)

  3. Link to Post #102
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,715 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Boom: another vaccine whistleblower steps out of the shadows
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...f-the-shadows/

    Quote Boom: another vaccine whistleblower steps out of the shadows
    4/7/16

    by Jon Rappoport
    Boom: another vaccine whistleblower steps out of the shadows

    Vaccine Empire wobbles on its foundations

    By Jon Rappoport

    The new film Vaxxed highlights one whistleblower, researcher William Thompson, who publicly admitted he and his CDC colleagues lied, cheated, and committed gross fraud in exonerating the MMR vaccine and pretending it had no connection to autism.

    Now we have another: Dr. Peter Fletcher.

    The Daily Mail has the story (3/29/16): “Former [British] science chief: ‘MMR fears coming true’”.

    “A former Government medical officer responsible for deciding whether medicines are safe has accused the Government of ‘utterly inexplicable complacency’ over the MMR triple vaccine for children.”

    “Dr Peter Fletcher, who was Chief Scientific Officer at the Department of Health, said if it is proven that the jab causes autism, ‘the refusal by governments to evaluate the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history’.”

    “He added that after agreeing to be an expert witness on drug-safety trials for parents’ lawyers, he had received and studied thousands of documents relating to the case which he believed the public had a right to see.”

    “He said he has seen a ‘steady accumulation of evidence’ from scientists worldwide that the [MMR] measles, mumps and rubella jab is causing brain damage in certain children.”

    “But he added: ‘There are very powerful people in positions of great authority in Britain and elsewhere who have staked their reputations and careers on the safety of MMR and they are willing to do almost anything to protect themselves’.”

    “In the late Seventies, Dr. Fletcher served as Chief Scientific Officer at the DoH [Dept. of Health] and Medical Assessor to the Committee on Safety of Medicines, meaning he was responsible for deciding if new vaccines were safe.”

    “He first expressed concerns about MMR in 2001, saying safety trials before the vaccine’s introduction in Britain were inadequate.”

    “Now he says the theoretical fears he raised appear to be becoming reality.”

    “He said the rising tide of autism cases and growing scientific understanding of autism-related bowel disease have convinced him the MMR vaccine may be to blame.”

    “’Clinical and scientific data is steadily accumulating that the live measles virus in MMR can cause brain, gut and immune system damage in a subset of vulnerable children,’ he said.”

    “’There’s no one conclusive piece of scientific evidence, no “smoking gun”, because there very rarely is when adverse drug reactions are first suspected. When vaccine damage in very young children is involved, it is harder to prove the links.’”
    “’But it is the steady accumulation of evidence, from a number of respected universities, teaching hospitals and laboratories around the world, that matters here. There’s far too much to ignore. Yet government health authorities are, it seems, more than happy to do so’.”

    The pressure is building on the medical establishment and their press lackeys. Of course, they will try to keep the lid on. But more and more people around the world—many through bitter personal experience with vaccines—are waking up.

    The statements of establishment front men ring hollow.

    “Well, of course these vaccines are safe, remarkably so. How could any sane person think otherwise?”

    Sane people are thinking otherwise. They know they’re being conned, and their health and the health of their children is under attack.

    More whistleblowers are going to come out of the closet. The strange notion of having an actual conscience is making a comeback.

    Even media androids, whose job it is to spread disinformation, are going to realize they’re nothing more than dupes for the vaccine cartel. And some of them aren’t going to like the realization, especially when it interrupts their sleep at night.

    Especially as they come to understand they’re aiding and abetting the lifelong infliction of brain damage on innocent children.

    Not everyone can blithely go on their way, doing their dirty work, in the face of that knowledge.

    I’ve been working as an independent reporter for 30 years, and I can tell you that at this point, the whole vaccine propaganda apparatus is like a porcelain vase sitting on a table. And an earthquake is commencing.

    Somewhere, right now, as I write this, a vaccine expert none of us yet knows about is sitting in his office thinking: “Thompson and Fletcher have come forward. It might be time for me to tell what I know, what I’ve been hiding all these years.”

    He isn’t a hero. He’s a chronic scientific liar who can’t stand the conspiracy of silence any longer.

    He’s remembering what a conscience is.

    And he’s calculating the relative consequences of voluntarily coming clean now vs. being exposed later.

    He’s sniffing which way the new wind is blowing.

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (8th April 2016), gnostic9 (15th April 2016), Hervé (8th April 2016), lake (14th November 2016), PathWalker (8th April 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (6th May 2016), william r sanford72 (14th September 2016)

  5. Link to Post #103
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,715 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    THIS IS SIGNIFICANT AND SHOULD NOT BE MISSED! Please start with the comments in red. Thanks!
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    former government science chief: Mmr vaccine “one of the greatest scandals in medical history”
    april 6, 2016
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/former...dical-history/

    Quote april 6, 2016

    former government science chief: Mmr vaccine “one of the greatest scandals in medical history”

    by sue corrigan
    daily mail

    excerpts:

    A former government medical officer responsible for deciding whether medicines are safe has accused the government of “utterly inexplicable complacency” over the mmr triple vaccine for children.

    dr peter fletcher, who was chief scientific officer at the department of health, said if it is proven that the jab causes autism.

    “the refusal by governments to evaluate the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history.”

    he added that after agreeing to be an expert witness on drug-safety trials for parents’ lawyers, he had received and studied thousands of documents relating to the case which he believed the public had a right to see.

    He said he has seen a “steady accumulation of evidence” from scientists worldwide that the measles, mumps and rubella jab is causing brain damage in certain children.

    But he added:

    “there are very powerful people in positions of great authority in britain and elsewhere who have staked their reputations and careers on the safety of mmr and they are willing to do almost anything to protect themselves.”
    read the full article at daily mail.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...#ixzz44osasuxc
    Quote former science chief: 'mmr fears coming true'
    by sue corrigan, mail on sunday
    last updated at 12:29 29 march 2016

    a former government medical officer responsible for deciding whether medicines are safe has accused the government of "utterly inexplicable complacency" over the mmr triple vaccine for children.
    Dr peter fletcher, who was chief scientific officer at the department of health, said if it is proven that the jab causes autism, "the refusal by governments to evaluate the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history".
    He added that after agreeing to be an expert witness on drug-safety trials for parents' lawyers, he had received and studied thousands of documents relating to the case which he believed the public had a right to see.
    He said he has seen a "steady accumulation of evidence" from scientists worldwide that the measles, mumps and rubella jab is causing brain damage in certain children.
    But he added: "there are very powerful people in positions of great authority in britain and elsewhere who have staked their reputations and careers on the safety of mmr and they are willing to do almost anything to protect themselves."
    his warning follows reports that the government is this week planning to announce the addition of a jab against pneumococcal meningitis for babies, probably from next april. It is also considering flu jabs for under-twos - not to protect the children, but adults they may infect.
    In the late seventies, dr fletcher served as chief scientific officer at the doh and medical assessor to the committee on safety of medicines, meaning he was responsible for deciding if new vaccines were safe.
    He first expressed concerns about mmr in 2001, saying safety trials before the vaccine's introduction in britain were inadequate.
    Now he says the theoretical fears he raised appear to be becoming reality.
    He said the rising tide of autism cases and growing scientific understanding of autism-related bowel disease have convinced him the mmr vaccine may be to blame.
    "clinical and scientific data is steadily accumulating that the live measles virus in mmr can cause brain, gut and immune system damage in a subset of vulnerable children," he said.
    "there's no one conclusive piece of scientific evidence, no 'smoking gun', because there very rarely is when adverse drug reactions are first suspected. When vaccine damage in very young children is involved, it is harder to prove the links.
    "but it is the steady accumulation of evidence, from a number of respected universities, teaching hospitals and laboratories around the world, that matters here. There's far too much to ignore. Yet government health authorities are, it seems, more than happy to do so."
    'why isn't the government taking this massive public health problem more seriously?'
    dr fletcher said he found "this official complacency utterly inexplicable" in the light of an explosive worldwide increase in regressive autism and inflammatory bowel disease in children, which was first linked to the live measles virus in the mmr jab by clinical researcher dr andrew wakefield in 1998.
    "when scientists first raised fears of a possible link between mad cow disease and an apparently new, variant form of cjd they had detected in just 20 or 30 patients, everybody panicked and millions of cows were slaughtered," said dr fletcher.
    "yet there has been a tenfold increase in autism and related forms of brain damage over the past 15 years, roughly coinciding with mmr's introduction, and an extremely worrying increase in childhood inflammatory bowel diseases and immune disorders such as diabetes, and no one in authority will even admit it's happening, let alone try to investigate the causes."
    he said there was "no way" the tenfold leap in autistic children could be the result of better recognition and definitional changes, as claimed by health authorities.
    "it is highly likely that at least part of this increase is a vaccinerelated problem." he said. "but whatever it is, why isn't the government taking this massive public health problem more seriously?"
    his outspokenness will infuriate health authorities, who have spent millions of pounds shoring up confidence in mmr since dr wakefield's 1998 statement.
    But dr fletcher said the government is undermining public confidence in vaccine safety by refusing to do in-depth clinical research to rule out fears of mmr damage to children.
    He added that the risks of brain and gut damage from mmr injections seem to be much higher in children where a brother or sister has diabetes, an immune disorder.
    "that is a very strong clinical signal that some children are immunologically at risk from mmr," he said. "why is the government not investigating it further - diverting some of the millions of pounds spent on advertising and pr campaigns to promote mmr uptake into detailed clinical research instead?"
    now retired after a distinguished 40-year career in science and medicine in britain, europe and the us, dr fletcher said that without such research, health authorities could not possibly rule out fears about mmr.
    He said: "it is entirely possible that the immune systems of a small minority simply cannot cope with the challenge of the three live viruses in the mmr jab, and the ever-increasing vaccine load in general."
    he said he had decided to speak out because of his deep concern at the lack of treatment for autistic children with bowel disease, as revealed in the mail on sunday two weeks ago.
    He called the sudden termination of legal aid to parents of allegedly vaccine-damaged children in late 2003 "a monstrous injustice". After agreeing to be a witness for the parents, he received thousands of documents relating to the case.
    "now, it seems, unless the parents force the government to restore legal aid, much of this revealing evidence may never come out," he said.
    The department of health said: "mmr remains the best protection against measles, mumps and rubella. It is recognised by the world health organisation as having an outstanding safety record and there is a wealth of evidence showing children who receive the mmr vaccine are no more at risk of autism than those who don't."

  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Eram (8th April 2016), Ewan (8th April 2016), gnostic9 (15th April 2016), Hervé (8th April 2016), lake (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (6th May 2016), Sophocles (11th May 2016), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  7. Link to Post #104
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    15th August 2014
    Posts
    280
    Thanks
    310
    Thanked 759 times in 233 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Tesla --

    Very interesting that you mention this subject ....

    When we know not to touch the smallpox blankets.


    as it takes us back to the taking of this land --
    It seems to give a very clear clue that those who guided the invaders/"discoverers"
    knew something of science and were out to use it for malicious purposes even then.

    At the same time, they were telling native women NOT to breastfeed their babies
    because their milks was "blue" and not healthy.

    That was a very long journey, but they finally did stop breastfeeding -- at least in the US --
    a very strong link with our immune systems.

    In fact, I've seen it mentioned that breast milk kills the polio virus.

    But my main point here -- or at least the one I'm trying to make -- is that TPTB have control
    of scientific information and limit it.

    Information is power.

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Curious77 For This Post:

    gnostic9 (15th April 2016), Hervé (15th April 2016), lake (14th November 2016), seko (6th May 2016), Sophocles (11th May 2016)

  9. Link to Post #105
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    15th August 2014
    Posts
    280
    Thanks
    310
    Thanked 759 times in 233 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    I understand the government continues to try to push the Amish to get vaccines --
    and have been somewhat succeeding.
    But increasingly you see children who aren't the healthy Amish -- but the runny nosed Amish.

    Part of the push for mandates has to also involve the fact that they need to have every
    vaccinated in order to hide the differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated.

  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Curious77 For This Post:

    gnostic9 (15th April 2016), Hervé (15th April 2016), kennywally (4th August 2016), lake (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (6th May 2016), sheme (15th April 2016), Sophocles (11th May 2016)

  11. Link to Post #106
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Two more MMR vaccine whistleblowers: they’re suing

    by Jon Rappoport May6, 2016

    Two more MMR vaccine whistleblowers: they’re suing

    Where there’s smoke and fire—there’s more fire.

    You pro-vaccine soccer moms: pay attention.

    “The bigger the lie, the bigger the truth it is concealing. The truth is what people are afraid to accept.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

    The censored film, Vaxxed (trailer), has escaped the claws of the “protectors of all truth.” It has been showing to packed houses all over the country. It relates the specific crime of scientific fraud at the CDC. A whistleblower, William Thompson, confesses that he and his CDC colleagues lied and cheated and omitted vital data, in order to give the MMR vaccine a free pass and claim it had no connection to autism—when it did have a connection.

    That’s the purpose and meaning and focus of this astonishing film.

    But there is more. There are other whistleblowers shining a light on the MMR (mumps, measles, rubella) vaccine. Specifically, the mumps component of the vaccine and its ineffectiveness.

    Their names are Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlochowski. They’re former virologists at Merck. They’re insiders. They’ve leveled devastating charges against the company, which manufactures the MMR vaccine and sells it to the federal government.

    In 2010, the whistleblowers filed a suit against Merck. The suit drags on in court (“UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.,” Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ).

    The Huffington Post reports on the charges in the suit (“Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims,” 9/24/2014, updated: 11/27/2014):

    Quote “…former Merck scientists [claim] that Merck ‘fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].’”
    Quote “According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It ‘failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase [of the MMR vaccine] contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment described herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.’”
    Quote “These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to produce test results that would meet the FDA’s requirement that the mumps vaccine was 95 per cent effective. To the whistleblowers’ delight, the judge dismissed Merck’s objections to the case proceeding, finding the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged against Merck.”
    The whistleblowers’ charges include detailed specifics on how Merck cheated, in order to produce the false conclusion that the mumps component of the MMR vaccine was 95% effective. For example, Merck placed rabbit antibodies into blood samples—pretending these were human antibodies signaling a high level of immune response to the vaccine.

    It should be noted that this far-reaching charge of fraud covers years during which Dr. Julie Gerberding was the president of Merck vaccines.

    Why does this matter? Because Gerberding, before landing her high-paying job at Merck, was the head of the US Centers for Disease Control.

    And while she was the head of the CDC, in 2004, William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower revealed in Vaxxed, warned Gerberding that he had “sensitive” data about the MMR vaccine, and these data constituted a problem for the CDC.

    Thompson was obviously talking about the vaccine’s link to autism. Gerberding ignored Thompson.

    You could say she doubled down. After leaving the CDC, she became president of vaccines for Merck, the company that manufactures the MMR vacccine, holds a monopoly on it, and sells it to the CDC.

    —So when scientists, pundits, government officials, and other “experts” ponder how, at Harvard, a recent mumps outbreak could have affected previously vaccinated students, they’re faking it.

    Even within the (false) conventional view of how vaccines work and what they do, the mumps component of the MMR is a dud. It’s been an open secret for a long time.

    And now two Merck whistleblowers are lowering the boom in court.

    The US Justice Department wants nothing to do with this case. Neither does the US Congress. Inside the federal government, there are blind eyes everywhere.

    If the government actively pursued the case, among other revelations, the public would witness Dr. Julie Gerberding, former head of the CDC, president of Merck vaccines, being raked over the coals on the witness stand.

    That must never happen.

    If you think, while the case drags on, there is any effort to curtail the use of the vaccine, or investigate it, think again. The judge in the case has set a timetable which places the start of courtroom proceedings in…
    2018.

    Jon Rappoport

    Related:
    CDC Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson to Extend MMR Vaccine Fraud
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  12. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (7th May 2016), Ewan (7th May 2016), lake (14th November 2016), onawah (22nd May 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (6th May 2016), Sophocles (11th May 2016), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  13. Link to Post #107
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Harvard Mumps Outbreak: The Real Story Mainstream Media Won’t Tell You

    by Jefferey Jaxen Tue, 10 May 2016 18:51 UTC
    Health Impact News


    Mainstream media are reporting the news about mumps outbreaks at colleges like Harvard, but are they reporting the whole truth? Image source.


    Harvard University Health Services Director Paul Barreira recently stated:
    Quote “I’m actually more concerned now than I was during any time of the outbreak.”
    Harvard isn’t the only college in the Boston area hit by mumps this spring — Boston University, the University of Massachusetts and Tufts University have also reported cases among their students.

    Harvard’s recent mumps outbreak has brought all the usual media suspects to the forefront attempting to sweep any discussion of dangerous and ineffective vaccines under the table. NBC news is calling for more people to get mumps vaccines who are attending Boston area colleges by writing:
    Quote “Sometimes during an outbreak, doctors will even administer a third dose. There’s still a bit of debate around whether this really helps, but there’s no harm in giving the vaccine to someone who is already immune.”
    The statement, ran by NBC news, shows callous disregard for its readers intelligence and their safety. A simple look at the manufacturer’s vaccine insert or the total payout to date from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program refutes NBC’s claims 100 percent. Yet again, the mainstream media bias and framing of this story is tilted dangerously towards pro-pharmaceutical product pushing.

    Most — if not all — major reporting on the Harvard mumps outbreak forbid discussion of recent history casting pharmaceutical companies in a well-deserved bad light.

    Some reports mentioned the mumps outbreak in 2006 which saw at least 6,500 cases in 11 states — the biggest in recent history. In 2006, the concerns were about the waning effect of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine given during childhood. The same issues of waning immunity and vaccine ineffectiveness are still the only mainstream media’s pro-vaccine talking points today.

    Coincidentally the MMR vaccine is also currently the center of the breakout documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe. Dr. Amesh Adalja, an infectious-disease specialist and a senior associate at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center’s Center for Health Security went on record in a Wired to say:
    Quote “The exposure that they [students] have to mumps is so high in these situations [college] that it overcomes the ability of the vaccine to protect them.”
    According to Dr. Adalja’s logic, in addition to the MMR’s dangers and historical impotence, college students are offered no protection apparently because they are in college.

    NBC news host and vaccine injury denier Matt Lauer used the recent Harvard mumps outbreak to push all vaccine booster shots and plug the CDC’s vaccine schedule. It should be noted that the CDC is the largest purchaser of vaccines spending over $4 billion a year of tax-payer funds. Putting behind the heavily leveraged pharmaceutical manufacturer-sponsored media, there is most certainly a bigger story here.

    Merck’s Mumps Vaccine Fraud – Not Being Reported in Mainstream Media
    Let’s start with the current — under-reported — story of the Merck “mumps” whistleblowers.

    In 2010 a pair of former Merck virologists filed suit claiming Merck engaged in mumps research fraud. One of the Merck whistleblower virologist alleged in her 2010 lawsuit the following:
    Quote “During her employment there [Merck], she witnessed firsthand, and was asked to directly participate in, fraud in a clinical trial relating to the efficacy of Merck’s mumps vaccine.”
    In 2012, a clinic and two MD’s filed a class action lawsuit against Merck claiming violation of the Sherman Act — monopolistic, anti-competitive behavior resulting from the fraud — and violation of various state laws.

    Merck has a full monopoly over the mumps — and MMR — vaccine in the United States being the sole manufacturer licensed by the Food and Drug Administration. 2017 will mark the 50th anniversary of Merck’s de-facto exclusive license from the federal government to manufacture and sell a mumps vaccine in the U.S.

    How does all this information relate to Harvard’s — and any other — mumps outbreaks?

    The former Merck virologists stated in their 2010 lawsuit:
    Quote “The ultimate victims here are the millions of children who, every year, are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection,” And while federal health officials have said the disease was supposed to have been eradicated by now, “the failure of Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.”
    The lawsuits are still ongoing at the moment.

    College Students are Suffering from Mumps Vaccine Fraud and Cover-up
    Covering the mumps outbreak at Harvard, the Boston Globe writes:
    Quote “Massachusetts law requires undergraduates to be vaccinated against mumps before admission, and most of the Harvard students had been vaccinated, according to state health officials.”
    The Boston Globe should do a better job of checking their facts in this instance.

    Massachusetts law suggests students be vaccinated. However, Massachusetts law allows for parents and students to exercise their medical and religious autonomy by opting out of vaccination with a waiver.

    The university suggests that all enrolled students receive the MMR vaccine yet immunization can not be forced. Harvard currently respects the medical and religious exemptions described in the Massachusetts Immunization Law.

    However, in the past, many mumps outbreaks have been witnessed throughout fully vaccinated populations. In 2013, the University of Richmond had an outbreak currently rivaling that of Harvard’s despite all the effected students having a documented history of two doses of mumps-containing vaccine.

    Also in 2013, Loyola University in Maryland had an outbreak of 12 mumps cases despite the university requiring the MMR vaccine for all students.

    In 2013, a mumps outbreak at Fordham University in New York was spotlighted that showed all students diagnosed with the mumps had been fully vaccinated with the MMR vaccine before attending the university.

    Perpetuating the “Herd Immunity” Myth
    To explain away the recent Harvard mumps outbreak, the mainstream media continues to use the tired explanation of waning immunity after vaccination.

    No mainstream media outlet has decided to touch the proven cases of vaccine-caused disease outbreaks.

    However, the media and government have forced the idea — and based policy — around the failed theory of herd immunity.

    Assuming that the mumps vaccine is greatly effective — which evidence and whistleblowers have demonstrated it is not — the reality of achieving herd immunity with vaccines that continue to show limited effectiveness is an impossible fairy tale.

    The discussion rarely wades into the deep waters to question the CDC’s credibility, the dangers of vaccines or the impossibility of herd immunity.

    The mumps vaccine isn’t the only shot in the spotlight when one would like to debunk herd immunity. The flu vaccine was announced by USA Today to be only 23 percent effective in the U.S. for the 2014-2015 season. These dismal effectiveness numbers in the U.S. would have been welcomed by the Canadian Centre of Disease Control who reported during last years flu season that their flu shots offered zero protection.

    Herd immunity is impossible when vaccines remain ineffective.



    Related book:
    Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm


    eBook

    Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.

    Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.

    Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.

    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  14. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (12th May 2016), Ikarusion (18th May 2016), lake (14th November 2016), onawah (22nd May 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (3rd July 2016), Sophocles (11th May 2016), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  15. Link to Post #108
    United States Avalon Member bettye198's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th April 2010
    Location
    Laguna Niguel, CA - The Pearl of South Coast!
    Age
    71
    Posts
    571
    Thanks
    617
    Thanked 2,271 times in 463 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    We have copies of Dr. Andrew Moulden's work in our office for patients to read. He is our hero. He researched the eyes of the child and how they move differently as to the vaccine toxicity that would lead to brain abnormalities. What is crushing is that he died and he was not sick or old. Add his name to the many holistic physicians who were sacrificed.
    When you realize where you come from, you naturally become tolerant, disinterested, amused, kindhearted as a grandparent, dignified as a king. -- I Ching

  16. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to bettye198 For This Post:

    lake (14th November 2016), onawah (22nd May 2016), Paul (22nd May 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (3rd July 2016), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  17. Link to Post #109
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,715 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    New vaccines will permanently alter human DNA
    5/17/16 by Jon Rappoport
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...ter-human-dna/

    Quote Consider this article in light of the accelerating push to mandate and enforce vaccination across the planet.

    The reference is the New York Times, 3/9/2015, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

    “By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

    “’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

    “The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.”

    “I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

    Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

    Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.” Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Permanent alteration.

    The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

    “Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

    Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

    Let’s take this further. Under the cover of preventing disease (and all good covert ops float a laudatory goal to conceal their true intent), vaccines are ideal carriers for all sorts of genes that would be permanently incorporated into the human structure.

    The enormous tonnage of propaganda about vaccines, and the resultant mandatory laws that enforce vaccination, create a powerful channel along which re-engineering is eminently possible.

    Synthetic genes injected into billions of humans would form a grand experiment to create an altered species.

    This grand experiment could be compartmentalized. For example, secretly, genes 1-6 would be injected into Group A in geo-location I. Genes 7-12 would be injected into Group B in location II. And so on.

    Vaccine recipients will be subjected to ongoing surveillance to gauge the results. On various pretexts, members of these groups will be brought into clinics for exams and tests, to discover markers that purportedly reveal their bodies’ responses to the genetic alterations.

    Are these people stronger or weaker? Do they exhibit signs of illness? Do they report behavioral changes? Through surveillance and testing, all sorts of information can be compiled.

    Of course, there is no informed consent. The human guinea pigs have no knowledge of what is being done to them.

    And what would be the objectives of this lunatic research program? They would vary. On a simplified level, there would be two. Create weaker and more docile and more obedient and more dependent humans. On the other side, create stronger and healthier and more intelligent and more talented humans. Obviously, the results of the latter experiments would be applied to the “chosen few.” And clearly, some of this research will be carried on inside the military. Secrecy is easier to maintain, and the aim to produce “better soldiers” is a long-standing goal of the Pentagon and its research arm, DARPA.

    A global vaccine experiment of the type I’m describing here has another bonus for the planners: those people who fall ill or die can be written off as having suffered from various diseases and disorders which “have nothing to do with vaccines.” This is already SOP for the medical cartel.

    The numbers of casualties, in this grand experiment, would be of no concern to the Brave New World shapers. As I’ve documented extensively, the US medical system is already killing 2.25 million people per decade (a conservative estimate), as a result of FDA-approved drugs and mistreatment in hospitals. Major media and government leaders, aware of this fact, have done nothing about it.

    Here is a quote from Princeton molecular biologist, Lee Silver, the author of Remaking Eden. It gives you a window into how important geneticists are thinking about an engineered future:

    “The GenRich–who account for ten percent of the American population–[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class…

    “Naturals [unaltered humans] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.

    “Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.

    “Indeed, in a society that values individual freedom above all else, it is hard to find any legitimate basis for restricting the use of repro[grammed]-genetics. I will argue [that] the use of reprogenetic technologies is inevitable. [W]hether we like it or not, the global marketplace will reign supreme.”

    Here is another gem, from Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine:

    “Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future.”

    Notice that these two well-known scientists are speaking about “ethics.” A significant number of such experts have their own lunatic version of what is right and wrong.

    With vaccines that permanently alter human genetic makeup on the horizon, and given the corporate and government-agency penchant for secrecy, we are already inhabiting the Brave New World. It’s not a distant prospect.

    Every genetic innovation is aimed at bringing us closer to a stimulus-response world, and further away from freedom.

    Which is why the defense of freedom becomes ever more vital.

    That struggle comes down to who controls, yes, the philosophy, not the science. Is each human merely and only a system waiting to be re-engineered, or is he something far more, inhabiting a physical form?

    We already know what the vast majority of brain researchers and geneticists believe, as well as the governments and corporations and universities and foundations that make important decisions.

    Of course, these days, the college faculty department considered to be the least important, the most useless, a mere appendage waiting for those with wisdom to put it out of its misery and kill it off…is the philosophy department.

    That leaves us to take up the argument and the resistance.

    Not Lee Silver at Princeton or Gregory Stock or Bill Gates or George Soros or David Rockefeller or the Pope or Stephen Hawking or Obama or the Clintons or Monsanto or Dow or the Bush family or PBS or FOX or socialists or Communists or liberals or conservatives or some wackadoodle at Harvard or MIT or UCLA.

    Us.

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    lake (14th November 2016), PathWalker (4th June 2016), Paul (22nd May 2016), ponda (27th November 2016)

  19. Link to Post #110
    United States Avalon Member OBwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th March 2011
    Location
    USA - In the state of Colorado
    Age
    63
    Posts
    176
    Thanks
    198
    Thanked 772 times in 151 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?


    VAXXED Filmmakers: Andrew Wakefield and Del Bigtree

    I have not seen the movie VAXXED. I watched filmmakers discuss the video. It seems to me that the CDC is criminally liable in my opinion.

    Time 1:30: It is clear that MMR vaccine has a link to autism.

    Time 06:00: There is a real link between autism and the intestines.

    Time 09:00: By 2032 one in two children will have autism.

    Time 13:00: In 2001 the CDC conclude that there is a very strong association between the younger you get the MMR vaccine and the autism risk.

    Time 17:00: What we have is proof that fraud occurred.

    Time 22:22: The last time the government did a study on vaccines and autism was ten years ago.

    Time 24:15: Every seven minutes a child is diagnosed with autism.

    Time 31:00: Vaccines are categorized as Biologic and the testing only needs to prove that it creates antibodies. Side effect testing is not required for pharmaceutical products such as Viagra.

    Time 38:00: Neonatal intensive care unit nurses are ready for the baby to “Code” when they are given a vaccine. They are waiting for the baby to go into cardiac or respiratory arrest when vaccines are injected.

    Time 40:30: It cost 5 million dollars to raise an autistic child. One million children are now diagnosed as autistic and one hundred thousand added yearly. This will bankrupt any type of financial program.

    Time 50:57: USA has the sickest children in the industrial world. USA more day one infant deaths. 50% more day one death than all the industrial countries put together.

    The following are the demands;

    1) CDC whistleblower Doctor William Thompson that the VAXXED story is about, testify to congress
    2) Repeal of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act
    3) MMR broken into single vaccines
    4) All vaccine categorized as pharmaceutical product

  20. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to OBwan For This Post:

    :Renyse: (2nd July 2016), Hervé (4th June 2016), lake (14th November 2016), PathWalker (4th June 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (3rd July 2016), Tintin (18th August 2018)

  21. Link to Post #111
    Canada Avalon Member :Renyse:'s Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2016
    Location
    ~~a mercurian sea~~
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked 41 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    I saw the film Vaxxed recently and it blew my mind. I've researched and kept up on vaccines for the better part of 13 years and still I learned some crucial things in this film. I think it's wise they aren't presenting it as an anti-vaxx film even though the media spun it as such. The data was presented well and the stories of the vaccine-injured kids and their families hit me pretty powerfully. There's no way anyone with any sense could be unaffected (and not even a little outraged at least) seeing this and I believe everyone should see it! My heart breaks for the families that have been put through so much and will continue to be until the criminals responsible are held properly accountable.

    I've attempted to spread awareness of the film in my circles which has been met mostly with silence, disinterest and maybe a lukewarm question here and there... yeah I get it, they have their beliefs and faith in the establishment etc. but seriously!? Children are being harmed, families in crisis. People are risking their lives and livelihoods, reputations and careers to bring forth life-altering information to the public and in a film no less, and nope they aren't interested... don't want to believe all is not as they've been told. The programming has worked well on so many.

    It gets frustrating that if I wanted to talk ad nauseum about celebrities and Muslims and the news that's fine but CDC corruption & vaccines...? Too uncomfortable and/or emotionally charged.

    Anyway, I hope that the film is seen by as many as possible and it opens up greater awareness and hopefully rational discussion that leads to change.

  22. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to :Renyse: For This Post:

    Hervé (2nd July 2016), lake (14th November 2016), onawah (2nd July 2016), Paul (3rd July 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (3rd July 2016), Shannon (2nd July 2016)

  23. Link to Post #112
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    The Lawsuit Against SB 277 Has Been Filed…

    By Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    So, I called attorney Jim Turner about 5:00AM PST this morning and say “Where’s the case, dude?” He laughed… He’d been up all night. Right now it’s 5:00PM PST on Friday, July 1st, 2016 and I’ve got the final copy of the case against SB 277 in my hands. It will take a while to get this article out – a lot to read, and make phone calls about. But…

    I LOVE it.

    The case I talked about two days ago has been electronically filed by Carl Lewis in the San Diego Federal Court. I have attached copies of each of the individual document sets to this article. They will be easy to find. Take the time to familiarize yourself.

    The actual name of the filing is “Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief – Temporary Restraining Order Sought.” Below I will explain what all that means.

    And, there’s a bunch of backup documents. You can see every one.

    But first…
    Let me make a few points so we are all on the same page.

    [...]

    Full (long) article here: http://bolenreport.com/lawsuit-sb-277-filed/

    PS: What's SB 277:

    Quote SB 277 was, I think, about setting up a medical DELIVERY system, by injection, that the public is NOT ALLOWED TO QUESTION – mandatory vaccines.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  24. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    :Renyse: (3rd July 2016), avid (3rd July 2016), Baby Steps (31st August 2016), Ewan (4th July 2016), lake (14th November 2016), onawah (3rd July 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), seko (3rd July 2016), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  25. Link to Post #113
    Avalon Member Star Tsar's Avatar
    Join Date
    10th December 2011
    Location
    Virgo Supercluster
    Posts
    11,768
    Thanks
    27,246
    Thanked 31,497 times in 10,819 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Ark Midnight

    Episode 6 - Del Bigtree - Vaxxed | From Cover-Up to Catastrophe

    Published 17/7/2016

    Del Bigtree director of Vaxxed joins Ark Midnight to discuss his film & To take listener calls.

    Interview starts @ 19:10

    http://wwwvaxxedthemovie.com

    I for one will join in with anyone, I don't care what color you are as long as you want to change this miserable condition that exists on this Earth - Malcolm X / Tsar Of The Star

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Star Tsar For This Post:

    lake (14th November 2016), Michelle (21st July 2016), Paul (17th July 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  27. Link to Post #114
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Bang: Texas prosecutor video: “vaccines cause autism”

    by Jon Rappoport Aug30 , 2016

    The Vaxxed team does it again.

    Here is a stunning new interview with fearless San Antonio prosecutor, Nico LaHood, and his wife, Davida. Watch it. Share it.

    Polly Tommey of the Vaxxed team handles the interview. Nico LaHood lays it all out. He rips away the curtain and exposes the truth. Vaccines cause autism.

    As La Hood talks, the vaccine criminals and liars crumble into dust.

    Jon Rappoport


    Published on Aug 30, 2016
    District Attorney Nico LaHood and wife Davida tell the story of their son and daughter's vaccine injury to Polly Tommey of the VaxXed Team. Camera by Joshua Coleman and Anu Vaidya and editing by Joshua Coleman.

    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  28. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Ewan (31st August 2016), lake (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), Tintin (18th August 2018), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  29. Link to Post #115
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield Discusses Vindication of His Original Study Linking Vaccines to Autism

    By Derrick Broze August 31, 2016

    TOPICS:AutismDerrick BrozeDocumentaryDr Andrew WakefieldVaccinesVaxxed Movie



    On August 30, Activist Post reporter Derrick Broze attended a screening of Vaxxed: From Controversy to Cover-Up. Broze was able to speak with the film’s director, Dr. Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield was an author on one of the first studies to associate autism with vaccinations. Wakefield’s study was later said to be discredited.



    Watch the documentary Vaxxed here


    Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1 and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  30. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Ewan (1st September 2016), Fairy Friend (14th September 2016), lake (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), Sophocles (1st September 2016), william r sanford72 (3rd September 2016)

  31. Link to Post #116
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Arkansas Hit By Massive Mumps Outbreak, Only Amongst Vaccinated

    by Gary Barnes Health News September 13, 2016


    Back to school, feels like back to Mumps season.

    It appears that with the return to school and in light of mandatory vaccination laws, increased pressure by physicians to get vaccines, and of course vaccine shedding, Big Pharma is seemingly bringing back Mumps to our nation’s children.
    “In the last 15 years the highest number (in Arkansas) we’ve had was 14,” said Dr. Dirk Haselow.
    Luckily, for those children that have not been vaccinated, the same false sense of security doesn’t seem to apply. Avoiding germs and proper hygiene appear to be the best way to avoid Mumps, not relying on a controversial and highly ineffective MMR vaccine.

    As of Monday, the Arkansas Department of Health was following 98 cases. 67 of those had been confirmed through tests.

    The Arkansas Dept. of Health says they have seen no cases of the Mumps in people who aren’t immunized.

    After a Mumps case was detected at a school in Fayetteville, the school was cleaned and flu shots were offered.
    The district also said their records show none of the students in the sick child’s class have exemptions for the mumps vaccine.
    The witch hunt is clearly on to try and pin this on an unvaccinated child, rather than face the failed efficacy of the Merck MMR vaccine.

    As a precaution, Health Department is also requiring students who are not vaccinated to remain out of school until they have either had the vaccine or for a period up to 26 days.


    SOTT Comment:
    Mumps vaccine proves ineffective:
    A provocative new study titled, "Epidemic of complicated mumps in previously vaccinated young adults in the South-West of France," reveals that the MMR vaccine, despite generating high rates of presumably protective IgG antibodies against mumps, does not always translate into real-world immunity against infection as we have repeatedly been told. To the contrary, the study details cases where, despite the detection of high levels of antibodies against the mumps virus, patients contracted a malignant form of mumps that only rarely follows from natural, community acquired infection.

    Vaccine Failure Is Well Established In the Scientific Literature
    While counter-intuitive to those who uncritically accept the official marketing copy of the vaccine industry and their cheerleaders within government and the mainstream media, the research community and general public is beginning to appreciate how prevalent and well-documented vaccine failure really is, especially in the case of measles, hepatitis B, chickenpox, pertussis (whooping cough), HIV, polio, HPV, and influenza vaccines that do not work as advertised.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  32. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Ewan (15th September 2016), Fairy Friend (14th September 2016), lake (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), The Freedom Train (15th November 2016), william r sanford72 (14th September 2016)

  33. Link to Post #117
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Bombshell: CDC commits new vaccine-autism crime

    by Jon Rappoport Oct 21, 2016

    Here are the bones of the story. For the first time in 30 years, a vaccine-damage case has gone before a court judge. Lawyers for a 16-year-old autistic boy are suing a medical clinic for administering vaccines that brought about the autism. The CDC, of course, denies any connection between vaccines and autism. But one of its own long-time researchers, William Thompson, has publicly confessed to fraud in that area. Thompson states that he and his colleagues concealed research data that would have shown the MMR vaccine and mercury-laden vaccines do cause autism. The lawyers for the 16-year-old boy want to bring in Thompson to testify about what he knows. The CDC has said NO. The head of the CDC, Thomas Frieden, states, “Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS [the Department of Health and Human Services].”

    Well, he’s right, because the CDC is the PR arm of the vaccine industry. The CDC is a major purchaser of vaccines for the US federal government. If this boy won his case, other cases would follow. The potential monetary exposure in judgments? A trillion dollars or more.

    Ecowatch.com has the details:
    “The medical malpractice case seeking Dr. Thompson’s testimony is on behalf of 16-year-old Yates Hazlehurst. The lawsuit alleges that Yates is autistic as a result of vaccine injuries, which occurred when the vaccines were improperly administered in 2001. Because of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986 (VICA), Hazlehurst v. The Jackson Clinic is the only vaccine injury case that has gone to any U.S. court in 30 years.”

    “Dr. Thompson wants to reveal the scientific fraud and destruction of evidence that took place in the studies that he co-authored. However, in accordance with the Whistle Blower Protection Act and other federal regulations, Dr. Thompson can not testify under oath without the permission of the director of the CDC, Dr. Thomas Frieden.”

    “The request on behalf of Hazlehurst specifically relates to the issue of causation, i.e. the issue of whether vaccines can cause autism, which the State of Tennessee Circuit Court Judge found to be both relevant and a proper basis for seeking the deposition of Dr. Thompson.”

    “Judge Acree ordered on Feb. 5 that Dr. Thompson should be deposed. Following Judge’s Acree’s ruling, Smith [Bryan Smith, the boy’s attorney] filed a formal request to CDC to make Thompson available for deposition and trial testimony.”

    “On Sept. 22, in a letter from CDC Director Thomas Freiden, CDC denied Smith’s request. Smith explained that ‘this denial was a disappointment but not a surprise, since the inescapable implication of Dr. Thompson’s testimony is that the agency fraudulently altered the science to undermine autism cases worth potentially $1 trillion in compensation ordered by Congress’.”

    “Smith and Kennedy [Robert F Kennedy, Jr., the boy’s other attorney] plan to immediately appeal the CDC’s denial to federal court.”

    William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, is the subject of the film Vaxxed. Thompson has admitted publicly that he and his CDC colleagues literally threw damning data into a garbage can, to avoid reaching the conclusion, in a 2004 study, that the MMR vaccine raises the risk of autism in children.

    His testimony in court would be explosive, to say the least.

    Since he is still employed by the CDC, his bosses can keep him out of court. They can muzzle him. They can threaten him. No doubt, Thompson has also signed non-disclosure agreements with the Agency.

    How far would the federal government go to silence Thompson, who could open a Pandora’s box containing a trillion dollars in potential judgements? All the way is the obvious answer.

    The implications of Thompson’s testimony involve much more than money: the massive destruction of lives through vaccinations. That is ultimately the crime of crimes at the bottom of the cover-up.

    And the CDC would be rightly seen as a primary agent in both the crimes and the cover-up.

    If the US Department of Justice had any sense of honor, or courage, scores of CDC employees would be in jail right now.

    And if major media outlets had any sense of honor, or courage, they would be swarming all over the CDC, hammering on many employees and obtaining confessions from them, releasing the rank truth about vaccines from the Agency’s offices and labs of shame.

    Jon Rappoport
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  34. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Baby Steps (14th November 2016), BMJ (14th November 2016), Ewan (16th November 2016), Flash (14th November 2016), Houman (21st October 2016), lake (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), The Freedom Train (15th November 2016)

  35. Link to Post #118
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,232
    Thanks
    57,258
    Thanked 90,516 times in 14,926 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Vaccine damaged babies noticed in Mennonite communities

    By Jim Stone

    "They begin walking, then they get the shots and stop walking. It takes them two or three months to walk again, and when they do, their personality is different"

    During the election cycle, (which kept me from posting about this because it was off topic) I spoke to a Mennonite man named Keene who was selling Mennonite cookies on a street corner in Mexico. I was surprised he spoke English and asked him why there were so many Mennonites in Mexico. He said that the Canadian government had become so hostile to Mennonites that they have been moving to Mexico in large numbers. I asked him if the same thing was happening in the U.S. and he said yes - the Canadian mennonites fly right over the U.S. and go straight to Mexico, where there is much more freedom than either the U.S. or Canada. He said the American Mennonites are going to Mexico the same way.

    He said they are setting up large colonies in Mexico because the Mexican government leaves them alone, and that the Canadian and American governments are becoming very invasive, to the point of destroying them.

    I then shifted the conversation to vaccines and asked if the Mennonites accepted vaccines. He said they sometimes did, but that it was becoming less common because the vaccines obviously damage the babies. He said that when a baby that has started walking gets vaccinated, it gets very sick, stops walking for at least two months and when it is able to walk again it is not as smart and the personality has changed.

    The Mennonites are, more so than an average American family, more likely to know what their baby was like and are a lot less likely to take crap from a doctor saying the vaccines did not do it. THE MENNONITES KNOW.

    OH, AND MENNONITES ARE WEB SURFING "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!" NOT!

    Keene was very surprised to meet someone who was not Mennonite who would even ask the question about vaccines destroying babies, it has been HELL for them, THEY ALL KNOW IT, AND MENNONITES DO NOT EVEN GET ON THE INTERNET TO READ ABOUT IT. It is not an "internet conspiracy theory" for them, they have seen it first hand. All they ever get is the same sh*t from doctors, telling them that if they think the vaccines hurt their babies, they are nuts!
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  36. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Baby Steps (14th November 2016), BMJ (14th November 2016), Daozen (14th November 2016), Ewan (16th November 2016), Flash (14th November 2016), lake (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), The Freedom Train (15th November 2016)

  37. Link to Post #119
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    639
    Thanks
    3,140
    Thanked 2,591 times in 552 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    I would like to thank you all for your continued efforts in this thread.

    Thank you.

    I do not participate as I have no children, a choice I made 30+ years ago....but the continued 'bringing to the light' by yourselves, will lead eventually to a realization by many who now sleep.

    So again I thank you
    Normal..!

  38. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to lake For This Post:

    BMJ (14th November 2016), Ewan (16th November 2016), Flash (14th November 2016), Hervé (14th November 2016), ponda (27th November 2016), The Freedom Train (15th November 2016)

  39. Link to Post #120
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    23rd August 2016
    Age
    38
    Posts
    614
    Thanks
    5,034
    Thanked 2,790 times in 571 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    I have always considered it strange logic that unvaccinated children are the source of by-gone pestilence, since of course vaccination is supposed to protect people from these things. If an unvaccinated person is walking around with a plague, then any people vaccinated against the said plague are supposed to be immune. That is the whole reasoning behind getting the vaccinations in the first place.

  40. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Freedom Train For This Post:

    Ewan (16th November 2016), lake (15th November 2016)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 24 FirstFirst 1 6 16 24 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts