+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 24 FirstFirst 1 8 18 24 LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 477

Thread: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

  1. Link to Post #141
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Just WHAT ARE these Children’s Rights that California Senator Richard Pan Speaks of?
    Part 4 in the developing, “California State Senator Richard “The State Owns Your Child” Pan is At it Again…”
    Opinion by Karri Lewis AWAKE California
    http://bolenreport.com/just-children...rd-pan-speaks/

    Senate Bill 18 allows “professionals” approved by the state to make these decisions and more for your child

    Quote While California Senator Richard Pan is frantically sending out feel-good media propaganda pieces in a desperate attempt to cover-up the fact that Senate Bill 18 gives the state complete control over ALL California children, word is spreading.

    Senate Bill 18 allows “professionals” approved by the state to make these decisions and more for your child.
    In John Rappaport’s excellent article, “Bombshell: sacrificing children to the state of California: SB18,” https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...lifornia-sb18/ ... the unraveling of WHO and WHY is behind Senate Bill 18 becomes clear.

    Rappaport says:

    “Catch the flavor of the wording. It emerges like swamp gas: “The Legislature finds and declares that all children and youth, regardless of gender, class, race, ethnicity, national origin, culture, religion, immigration status, sexual orientation, or ability, have inherent rights that entitle them to protection, special care, and assistance, including, but not limited to, the following: The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest. The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being. The right to live in a safe and healthy environment. The right to social and emotional well-being. The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development. The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood. The right to appropriate, quality health care.”

    As if all these outcomes could be delivered to children on a silver platter.

    And the State would make it so?

    This bill is basically setting up the population of California for state regulatory agencies to fill in the blanks later, to make specific controls out of the vague generalities in the bill. Get it? “Medical care and nutrition and parenting and education are what we say they are. We define and enforce, you obey.”

    Rappaport goes on to explain WHERE all of this is coming from:




    “But let’s go to the money. In SB18, a group is referred to: the Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council. This Council has already written a children’s bill of rights, and SB18 is saying this is the model. This is the framework. This the pattern they’re following.

    That’s odd.

    Pay attention. This is where it becomes VERY interesting.
    The Peninsula Partnership is a group organized within the San Mateo County Office of Education. One piddling little California county education department.

    The Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council (PPLC) is composed of the San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools, the County Board of Supervisors and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.

    And now we hit pay dirt: THE SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION.

    Bam.

    It’s a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION. It runs 1800 philanthropic funds. Here are some of its corporate partners:
    Alexza Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell. Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund, “building and scaling social inventions.”

    For some reason, this huge Foundation is pushing a children’s bill of rights that is reflected in a new CA bill, SB18, that will eventually make the State the top-dog controlling force over all children in California.

    You can bet these corporate partners will reap profits. Beyond that, this is their version of a MASSIVE social engineering program. And that program is part of a technocratic movement to plan, format, and run the lives of the population from cradle to grave, because…

    The hi-tech scientists and engineers know best.

    It’s that stark.”

    In addition to Common Sense Media, we have all of these other corporate beneficiaries that stand to profit off of Senator Richard Pan’s SB18.

    Wow! What a HUMONGOUS financial boon and consumer capture for these corporations!

    Parents, doesn’t it make you feel good that Senator Richard Pan wants to sell your parental rights over to a bunch of what some are calling satanic, child molesters (scroll to about 1/3 of the way down the page) and corporate profiteers?

    Scary.

    Back to the topic at hand…

    Just WHAT ARE these Children’s Rights that Senator Richard Pan speaks of?

    Let’s take a look…

    As I was researching, I came across a short 35 minute documentary, “Overruled: Government Invasion of your Parental Rights.”

    Boy, was that video absolutely eye-opening and thought-provoking!

    If you have not seen it, I highly recommend clicking on the above link and watching it for yourself.

    The main take-away from this documentary is about how our involvement with the United Nations has led to the stealing (globalization) of our children and the gifting of them to the state through our state legislators.

    This all began on February 16, 1995, when then President Bill Clinton, had secretary of state, Madeleine Albright sign the “United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child TREATY.”

    According to Wikipedia:

    “However, though generally supportive of the Convention, President Bill Clinton did not submit it to the Senate.[6] Likewise, President Bush did not submit the Convention to the Senate. President Barack Obama has described the failure to ratify the Convention as ’embarrassing’ and has promised to review this.[7][8] The Obama administration has said that it intends to submit the Convention to the Senate, but there is no set timeline for it.[9]

    States may, when ratifying the Convention, ratify subject to reservations or interpretations. Besides other obligations, ratification of the Convention would require the United States to submit reports, outlining its implementation on the domestic level, to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child, a panel of child rights experts from around the world. Parties must report initially two years after acceding to (ratifying) the Convention and then every five years.[10]“

    Homeschool Legal Defense Association describes, The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, as “The Most Dangerous Attack on Parents’ Rights In the History of the United States:

    According to the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, a treaty directly applies to all citizens in the United States. Article VI, Section 2 states:

    “All treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution of the laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.”

    Looks like it’s time to ask President Trump to get us out of the United Nations and untangle ourselves from, “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.”

    Taking Away Parental Rights, One State at a Time…

    Washington State has already enacted a bill similar to Senate Bill 18 and has had so many problems and complaints from parents that they had to scale back on some of the laws that they were implementing.

    Take a look at the language of Washington’s children’s rights statute – RCW 13.34.020 – and then we’ll look at how Washington government agencies actually used it.

    Legislative declaration of family unit as resource to be nurtured—Rights of child.

    “The legislature declares that the family unit is a fundamental resource of American life which should be nurtured. Toward the continuance of this principle, the legislature declares that the family unit should remain intact unless a child’s right to conditions of basic nurture, health, or safety is jeopardized. When the rights of basic nurture, physical and mental health, and safety of the child and the legal rights of the parents are in conflict, the rights and safety of the child should prevail. In making reasonable efforts under this chapter, the child’s health and safety shall be the paramount concern. The right of a child to basic nurturing includes the right to a safe, stable, and permanent home and a speedy resolution of any proceeding under this chapter.”
    According to www.parentalrights.org, “Wash. Rev. Code § 13.34.020 affirms parental rights as fundamental, although strict scrutiny is not mentioned.”

    To pass “strict scrutiny,” the legislature must have passed the law to further a “compelling governmental interest,” and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

    So, just below, is the reality of how liberal-communist Washington bureaucrats used the law against parents.

    “A thirteen-year-old boy in Washington State was removed from his parents after he complained to school counselors that his parents took him to church too often. His school counselors had encouraged him to call Child Protective Services with his complaint, which led to his subsequent removal and placement in foster care. It was only after the parents agreed to a judge’s requirement of less-frequent church attendance that they were able to recover their son.2

    Once reported and in the system, parental decisions are ultimately made by a random Washington State judge in a state appointed dog and pony show, which includes a court-appointed “professional” to represent your child.

    Got that?

    Washington state even has a special bathroom law that gives special privileges to child predators… but I digress.

    What to DO Next…

    As Senate Bill 18, is pre-packaged and sold to the mainstream media as a wonderful idea, with new protections for children, it’s very important for all freedom loving citizens to get the word out.

    Speak out and inform your school boards, city councils, townhalls, friends and family.

    The only way to beat this horrific bill is with the TRUTH.

    Talk about Kidzworld.

    Talk about 65% of the kids found in child trafficking rings are wards of the state.

    Talk about the sponsors of this bill.

    Talk about Senator Richard Pan and all of the money he is making passing bills that infringe on YOUR Parental Rights.

    Get on the email list of parentalrights.org

    Folks, it’s up to you. Do not leave it to anyone else.

    Opinion by Karri Lewis AWAKE California
    Last edited by onawah; 18th December 2016 at 20:29.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (25th December 2016), Ewan (18th December 2016), Paul (18th December 2016), Sammy (9th January 2017), william r sanford72 (18th December 2016)

  3. Link to Post #142
    United States Avalon Member OBwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th March 2011
    Location
    USA - In the state of Colorado
    Age
    63
    Posts
    176
    Thanks
    198
    Thanked 772 times in 151 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    The producers of the movie Vaxxed are on the road on the Vaxxed Bus. The Vaxxed Bus is taking the stories of vaccine injured children. Their message is to listen to the parents rather than the doctors.

    The recorded stories are on YOUTUBE.COM. The number of stories is over 4000 with a name on the bus of each injured child.

    You can search you tube with the following strings for stories about a specific vaccination.

    #vaxxed #mmr
    #vaxxed #hepb
    #vaxxed #dtap
    #vaxxed #polio
    #vaxxed #chickenpox
    #vaxxed #prevnar
    #vaxxed #gardasil


    The stories of medical professionals can be heard using the following search.

    #vaxxed #medical
    Last edited by OBwan; 18th December 2016 at 21:28.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OBwan For This Post:

    Ewan (18th December 2016), onawah (18th December 2016), Sammy (9th January 2017)

  5. Link to Post #143
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    A SERIES THAT ANSWERS
    THE REAL QUESTIONS
    ABOUT VACCINES;
    THEIR SAFETY, EFFICACY, AND HOW THEY REALLY IMPACT YOUR HEALTH.
    This exclusive documentary series is about to be unveiled for FREE viewing on January 10th – 18th.
    EPISODE 1 AIRS JANUARY 10TH
    REGISTER FOR FREE DOCU-SERIES ACCESS
    http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/
    HEAR FROM LEADING EXPERTS
    DURING THIS EXCLUSIVE EVENT




    YES, YOU READ THAT RIGHT…
    According to the HSRA (Government Website) 88 of the 108 cases settled the first quarter of 2016 were for injuries and deaths due to the flu vaccine, making the flu vaccine the most dangerous vaccine in the U.S., harming and killing more people than all the other vaccines put together.
    It’s practically guaranteed that mandated vaccinations will affect our kids, our grandchildren, our parents, our friends and loved ones.
    It’s a horrifying thought, but it’s the reality we’re facing.
    Children’s lives are at stake, and they are suffering and even dying due to ignorance and misinformation about what vaccine risks and injuries really are.
    OUR MISSION

    Our mission is to prevent vaccine injury and death and to promote and protect the right of every person to make informed independent vaccination decisions for themselves and their families.
    We will not stop until the entire world is educated and empowered with knowledge exposing the truth about vaccines.
    The all-or-nothing dynamic that exists with the vaccine hubbub completely polarized the issue and prevents any reasonable discussion from taking place. Either you accept all of the CDC’s recommended 69 doses of 16 vaccines between birth and age 18, or you want to bring back measles, polio, and probably the black plague.
    WILL YOU JOIN US?

    Over the last decade, we’ve produced award-winning documentaries providing answers and revealing alternative health solutions. We’ve traveled the world, interviewed the top authorities and filmed thousands of hours to bring the essential facts about GMO’s, Big Pharma and Vaccines to the forefront.
    We’ve launched 3 full-length documentaries on these subjects, and have had over a million people watch our award-winning documentary films online.
    Mandatory vaccinations are about to open up a new land-grab for government control. Other medical issues seem to pale in comparison to forcibly medicating millions against their will. Voluntary and informed consent are essential in our individual rights, and without it, we do not possess true freedom.
    We have dozens of luminaries and experts presenting the absolute best and most up to date advice and material for parents who really want to know what is going on behind the scenes.
    Last edited by onawah; 25th December 2016 at 05:55.

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (25th December 2016), Hervé (30th December 2016), OBwan (1st January 2017), Sammy (9th January 2017)

  7. Link to Post #144
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    This (the post above http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1122625 ) looks like a major event in the vaccine "controversy".
    Though it's hard to imagine how it can even be called a controversy with all the evidence demonstrating the many dangers of vaccines, and the skewed "science" behind the policy itself.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (25th December 2016), Hervé (30th December 2016), Sammy (9th January 2017)

  9. Link to Post #145
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,884
    Thanks
    7,333
    Thanked 22,749 times in 4,211 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Dead Babies,Monkey’s,Formaldehyde,Detergents,Paint Chemicals,Aluminum






    Published on Dec 29, 2016
    A wonder cocktail of sweet poison has been injected into Millions of people under the disguise of "Vaccines" and preventative disease. If you've ever heard there is dead baby cells in vaccines and thought it was a conspiracy, the conspiracy is reality. This information and more is presented in this quick podcast.
    .................................................. my first language is TYPO..............................................

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Ewan (30th December 2016), Hervé (30th December 2016), Sammy (9th January 2017)

  11. Link to Post #146
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    The NEW Lawsuit(s) Against California’s Efforts to Take Control of ALL Children Away From Parents…

    Yes, Yes, It’s Coming. Take a deep breath…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    http://bolenreport.com/new-lawsuits-...-away-parents/



    Quote I know, I know, the question I get most often is “where is the new lawsuit against SB 277?”

    It’s coming…

    Why is it taking so long?

    (1) The most obvious reason is that the new case had to take into consideration the makeup of the new US Supreme Court after the presidential election.

    (2) The most important reason, however, was that the case has national, and international, implications – and has to be designed to take that into consideration.

    (3) Then, of course, the Communist Regime in California added a second layer of concern – California Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) designed to take ALL control of children away from California parents and make those children little socialist performance tools of the State.



    California is the Test State for the Globalist Democrats…

    What is happening in California is what was planned for the entire US under the “Empress Hillary” Regime. It is a dry run…

    Fortunately, the American Public caught on in time, and despite all of those dead people in Chicago graveyards voting solidly for Hillary, the final vote went for America’s Choice Donald Trump.

    One Political Pundit tells me that Hillary seems to have captured 100% of the Dead Veteran vote, nationwide – all of which came in as “Absentee Ballots”…

    Maybe we were all wrong about Hillary not having any crowds at her rallies? Maybe we just couldn’t see them? Maybe they were all ghosts from the Civil War, World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the deserts? Hmmm… Look at it THAT way, and you can see why they were all “Absentee Ballots.” Did anyone look too see where they were “Postmarked” from? (dark humor intended).

    And, of course Hillary COMMANDED the Illegal Alien vote – but, hey, we all expected THAT, right?

    Sarcasm intended…

    The IBTimes said of Clinton:


    James Steyer of “Common Sense Media” – sponsor of California SB 18, the legislation to take all California children away from their parents.
    “During her first public speaking engagement since her concession speech, Clinton accepted defeat but encouraged American’s to continue to push forward and focus on making changes that will benefit the children of the country.”

    “I know this isn’t easy. I know that over the past week a lot of people have asked themselves whether America was the country we thought it was. The divisions laid bare by this election run deep. But please listen to me when I say this: America is worth it. Our children are worth it,” she said Wednesday night.

    Now, we can see the Globalist Plan – a complete State takeover of our children…

    There is an interesting group in California called “Democrats Against UN Agenda 21.” I encourage you to familiarize yourself with their website.

    Why? Two reasons.

    (1) I tend to pick on liberal Democrats a lot, leaving the impression that they are, as a whole, shallow self-serving entitlement dolts incapable of complete sentences and coherent thought beyond analyzing the latest TV episode of Honey Boo-Boo while ordering silk panties on-line for the men in their lives.

    Considering what happened in California over SB277 (the bill to force-vaccinate all California children with untested Made-in-China death pus tubelets)) it would be hard to refute my analysis of what actually happened with BOTH sides of the SB277 arguments.

    But, I am going to show you a group of Democrats right here in California that, frankly, reminds me of the OLD Democratic Party – like during the Jack Kennedy days. I already mentioned their name, just above.

    (2) With this group of California Democrats there just might be a chance to revive the two-party system.

    Why do I say that?




    Read what they have to say about “Common Core….”

    “Common Core is UN Agenda 21

    Common Core is an integral part of UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development: globalization is the standardization of systems.

    Whether the system is law enforcement or land use or government, the standardization, harmonization, and integration of all international methods of management is essential for total control.

    Education is the flash point for embedding system acceptance in all sectors of the population. Standardized propaganda is developed for pre-kindergarten to post graduate school; this is what is meant by ‘Life Long Learning.’


    Breaking down traditional methods of learning in order to re-socialize the populace is the goal. Obedient, dependent people who are constantly being propagandized will provide the ‘human capital’ to fully implement UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.

    Regardless of the content of this nationalized and internationalized system of behavioral modification, the goal and outcome will be to fundamentally destroy the individual’s rights.”

    Read paragraphs three, four, and five, just above, once again…

    The sleazy GLOBALISTS got stopped DEAD nationally with their plan to destroy America’s middle class November 8th, 2016.

    Of course California is their fall-back position. It is perfect for it. It is a completely controlled by a well-funded ultra-liberal inherently corrupt self-serving Democratic Party political machine.

    California’s reputation is no secret word-wide. The Washington Times tells us in an editorial:

    EDITORIAL: One law for us, another for you

    California’s legislative hypocrisy a failure of democracy

    “The California state Senate voted 28-8 Wednesday to exempt itself from the pointless gun-control laws that apply to the rest of the populace. Legislators apparently think they alone are worthy to pack heat on the streets for personal protection, and the masses ought to wait until the police arrive.
    This is just one of many bills Golden State politicians used this legislative session to set themselves apart from the little people, the ones who pay their inflated salaries. Annual compensation for legislators averages about $140,000, not counting luxurious perks such as taxpayer-funded cars and free gasoline. By comparison, the average Californian earns $50,000 a year, and the unemployment rate is 11.9 percent – far above the national average. Exact salaries for state assemblymen and senators are obscured by the use of a “per diem” payment scheme that shelters a significant chunk of income from taxation.”

    I guess an argument over holiday parking spots at the mall will have a brutal outcome when Senator Pan whips out his “Dirty Harry” gun and pistol-whips a Sacramento area Socker Mom.

    In short, the political situation, and the arguments involving mandatory vaccines, and who has control of children (parents or the State) have GROWN into a nationwide issue…

    Before the new lawsuit is filed a lot more research into the situation needs to be done.

    Besides the constitutional questions, with what came out of the presidential election campaign regarding Democratic Party “sex-with-children” issues, it is a good time to examine JUST EXACTLY WHAT Senator Dick Pan had in mind when he wrote that section of Senate Bill 18 where he said children should have “The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being.”

    I get a mind-picture of an eleven-year old little girl coming home from school all excited because she has just been told she is going on a State-required Civics Class “field trip” over the weekend with an airplane ride to a private island saying: “Gee Mom, there’s going to be a former US President there named Bill Clinton, a former Speaker-of-the House named Dennis Hastert, a former US Congressman named Anthony Weiner, and the airplane is made just for little girls because it’s called “The Lolita Express.” I know I’ll learn a lot…”

    Yeah….

    On January 20th, 2017 there will be a new President in the White House – one who has no doubts about which bathroom to use. That President is picking a new Attorney General, and a head of the FBI, both of which, I’d wager, are going to take a much harder look at those 650,000 e-mails the New York City Police Department found on Anthony Weiner’s computer.

    As Trump confidant Roger Stone on his website StoneColdTruth says:

    “Metaphorically the Huma-Weiner emails are like Nixon’s Watergate tapes. They are indelible. They are Damning and their content cannot be contained because too many people have full copies. My sources tell me that the files include evidence of treason, self-dealing pay for play, corruption, sexual exploitation of children and far more detail on the Clinton’s sorted relationship with the billionaire pedophile Jeffery Epstein.”

    I think we’ve JUST GOTTEN STARTED looking into what the Democratic Party REALLY has in mind for our children with Senate Bills 277 and 18.

    Stay tuned…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    SHARE THIS:
    And one of the comments:
    Quote Ralph Fucetola JD says:
    December 30, 2016 at 1:42 pm
    Please tell the Trump Transition Team to Stop Vax Mandates here: http://tinyurl.com/vaccinepolicy — we are looking for a sponsor in the new Congress for a bill to protect the universal right to Informed Consent. Any Congressperson out there interested?

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (31st December 2016), Hervé (30th December 2016), Sammy (9th January 2017)

  13. Link to Post #147
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Is the Clinton/Pan Vaccine Plan for America’s Children – Agenda 21?…

    (Astrological factors also determine greatly how generations differ in their agendas and how they bring change to the world, but I certainly think Bolen has a point in saying that the generations who have been heavily vaccinated are going to differ greatly from those who were not specifically because of the vaccines. )

    http://bolenreport.com/is-the-clinto...ren-agenda-21/

    Quote I have ALWAYS had two questions about the Globalist Elite’s Overall Agenda 21 Plan:

    (1) When reducing the world population down from nine billion to 500 million by the year 2021 (now moved to 2030) who lives and who dies?

    (2) Who decides who lives and who dies?

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen



    Hillary Clinton arranged for ALL childhood vaccines to be made in China with NO independent laboratory testing of them before injection into America’s innocent children. Richard Pan arranged for those untested vaccines to be MANDATORY for America’s children…
    I think The US Childhood Vaccine Program is a Bio-Chemical Social Engineering Delivery System for an Agenda 21 Objective…More, I think this bio-chemical social engineering program has been operating for a long time.

    Probably since the late 1980s.

    Why do I think so?

    As we now know, most childhood vaccines, since 2014, are made by one or more of the thirty four Chinese vaccine manufacturers and there is NO TESTING PROCESS in place, what-so-ever, to determine what is actually being injected into America’s children. And, we also know that the Clinton Foundation arranged all this.

    Most Americans wouldn’t knowingly feed their pets Chinese-made products – yet the government of California, for instance, is EAGER to force-inject millions of innocent children with un-inspected, un-tested. Made-in-China vaccines. Ask yourself why…

    There is not now, nor has there ever been, an independent testing laboratory situation for childhood vaccines in the US.

    Isn’t THAT interesting?


    There is something unsavory going on here… I think Childhood vaccines are laced with some things we DEFINITELY do not want in our children, and independent laboratory testing would see THAT right away.

    Other countries have already caught the World Health Organization (WHO) doing this.

    I think we are already seeing the effects of those laced vaccines…

    Where are we seeing those effects?

    In 1968, at the Democratic Convention in Chicago, young Democrats caused near-riot when they questioned the Vietnam War. Seven of their leaders went on trial for their activities. The US was beset with edge-of-violence Vietnam War protests.

    However…

    In 2016, when the non-election of Bernie Sanders in the Democratic Party Primary was rigged, young Democrats, instead of getting angry and reacting, had to find “safe spaces” to hide and cry in. They were provided with other people’s dogs to pet. They had to get counseling to decide which of their thirty-four gender choices for the day would dominate – so they could decide which bathroom to use.

    Big difference in young Democrats between 1968 and 2016…

    All of this sounds very much like vaccine damage to me…

    Something GUTTED our youth… And I think it was intentional. And I think it was vaccines…

    If you read the language in the UN Agenda 21 program – everything begins to become clear. There is an interesting group in California called “Democrats Against UN Agenda 21.” I encourage you to familiarize yourself with their website.

    Let’s Talk about the Vaccine Safety Data Link…

    There were two separate US programs established to supposedly monitor vaccines and their effects on the US population – VAERS (Vaccines Adverse Event Recording System) and VSD (Vaccine Safety Data link).

    VAERS is virtually worthless because it is voluntary. Pediatricians, I think, who dare to report an Adverse reaction would be chastised, at best.

    VSD is TOP SECRET. NO One, outside of a select few, sworn to silence, can see the data compiled by the nine contractors, on the millions of vaccinated children observed since January of 1991. The SECRECY itself makes the program suspect.

    There actually were some independent studies completed, about ten, using the VSD data. BUT, after those researchers began to report their findings they got threatened and cut off from further access.

    It was obvious, when you read those peer-reviewed studies, why they got cut off…

    Donald Trump was elected to the Presidency by areas of the country that have NOT been MASSIVELY vaccinated…

    Have we come to the point in the United States, where we can stop this vaccine madness?

    Stay tuned…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    Last edited by onawah; 8th January 2017 at 19:29.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Sammy (9th January 2017)

  15. Link to Post #148
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    This passage from the Bolen report posted above:
    Quote In 2016, when the non-election of Bernie Sanders in the Democratic Party Primary was rigged, young Democrats, instead of getting angry and reacting, had to find “safe spaces” to hide and cry in. They were provided with other people’s dogs to pet. They had to get counseling to decide which of their thirty-four gender choices for the day would dominate – so they could decide which bathroom to use.

    Seemed unjustly harsh to me, but after reading the article I posted here:
    http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1125984

    ...not quite so much so. Things are so wildly out of balance on the planet now!

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Sammy (9th January 2017)

  17. Link to Post #149
    United States Avalon Retired Member Sammy's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    watching my Cowboys
    Age
    61
    Posts
    5,042
    Thanks
    28,918
    Thanked 25,376 times in 4,692 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Meeting with Trump emboldens anti-vaccine activists, who see an ally in the Oval Office

    here

    will be interesting to see how this actually "pans" out.
    All the above is all and only my opinion - all subject to change and not meant to be true for anyone else regardless of how I phrase it.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Sammy For This Post:

    NancyV (9th January 2017)

  19. Link to Post #150
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Meningitis Vax Tied to Bell’s Palsy Risk
    January 10, 2017
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...rid=1835887422

    Quote By Dr. Mercola

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends meningococcal conjugate vaccines (brand names Menactra and Menveo) for all 11- to 12-year-olds along with a booster dose at 16.1

    Menactra and Menveo vaccines (MCV4) contain four strains of meningococcal (A, C, W-35, Y) and are intended to help prevent invasive meningococcal disease, which is a bacterial infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis, or meningococcus, when the bacterium enters the blood stream.

    Meningococcal organisms are naturally present in the throat and nasal passages of humans and the majority of children develop antibodies to the bacteria without having any symptoms.

    There is a very low incidence of meningococcal disease in the U.S. but, rarely, individuals who are genetically or biologically susceptible to developing invasive meningococcal disease are at risk for severe injury and death, including loss of limbs.

    Symptoms may start out similar to influenza and can progress to nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light, red or purple skin rash and confusion.

    Other symptoms of severe bloodstream infection and inflammation of the lining of the brain and spinal cord (meningitis) include sudden high fever, severe persistent headache, stiff neck, joint pain and unresponsiveness.

    Despite the CDC's insistence that vaccination is the best way to protect all children against invasive meningococcal disease, serious questions remain about the vaccine's safety and effectiveness.

    Meningococcal Vaccination Linked to Bell's Palsy

    In a study using data from nearly 49,000 people between the ages of 11 and 21 years, Hung-Fu Tseng, Ph.D., from the Southern California Permanente Medical Group in Pasadena, California, and colleagues evaluated the safety of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine.

    A significantly increased risk of Bell's palsy, which causes paralysis or weakness of facial muscles, was found when the vaccine (Menveo) was given along with another vaccination. The condition typically occurred five to 10 weeks after vaccination.

    Overall, the risk of Bell's palsy increased 2.9-fold in the 12 weeks after vaccination among those administered concomitant vaccines. Bell's palsy has previously been noted as a complication of hepatitis B,2 smallpox and influenza vaccination (seasonal and H1N1) as well.3

    Research published in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics also revealed an increased risk of cranial nerve palsies following vaccination, especially combinations of vaccines.4

    In 59 percent of the cases, the palsies were identified as serious, which suggests, the authors noted, "that a cranial nerve palsy may sometimes be the harbinger of a broader and more ominous clinical entity, such as a stroke or encephalomyelitis [inflammation of the brain and spinal cord]." They continued:5

    "Cranial nerve palsies have been reported to VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System] following a wide variety of inactivated and live attenuated vaccines.

    Reports for trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine were the most frequent among single-vaccine reports, but they constituted only a weak plurality and not an overwhelming majority.

    The reports listing multiple vaccines largely reflected the most common combinations of routine immunizations administered to infants and young children: Diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine, Hemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 7-valent, and Poliovirus vaccine inactivated given together, as well as measles, mumps and rubella vaccine live co-administered with varicella vaccine live."

    Serious Adverse Events Revealed When Menactra Is Administered Along With HPV Vaccine

    Bell's palsy is not the only adverse event that's been revealed when meningococcal vaccines are administered along with other vaccinations, particularly Gardasil human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.

    The CDC recommends both Menactra and Gardasil for all 11- to 12-year olds in the U.S. and, although they may often be administered simultaneously, this concomitant use was not studied for safety in Gardasil's initial clinical trials.

    In 2007, only a year after Gardasil was approved, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) analyzed reports of serious adverse events reported to VAERS after individuals received Gardasil alone or along with Menactra.6

    They revealed a 1,000-percent increase in reports of the autoimmune disorder Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) to VAERS when the vaccines were administered simultaneously. Reports of other serious adverse events were also significantly increased, including:

    Respiratory problem reports increased by 114 percent
    Cardiac problem reports increased by 118 percent
    Neuromuscular and coordination problem reports increased by 234 percent
    Convulsions and central nervous system problem reports increased by 301 percent
    Reports of injuries from falls after unconsciousness (vasovagal syncope) increased by 674 percent
    In 2010, Merck released a clinical trial showing that the concomitant use of Menactra with Gardasil "did not compromise the safety," but at the same time admitted that the trial may have been skewed because of "incorrect administration" of the Menactra in 92 subjects,7 which in my opinion questions the validity of this trial, especially since it had so few subjects in it to begin with.

    State-Mandated Meningococcal Vaccines


    Total video length: 18:51
    More than two dozen states mandate meningococcal vaccines for all children attending school, typically during grade 6 or 7, but there is much debate over whether this one-size-fits-all policy is safe and cost effective.

    MCV4 is one of the more expensive pediatric vaccines on the U.S. market. It costs an average $115 per shot in a private pediatrician's office, not including administration fees, and an average $78 per shot through the federally subsidized Vaccines for Children (VFC) program.8

    As noted by Christina Abel, a registered nurse with Vaccine Awareness Minnesota in response to Minnesota's meningococcal vaccine mandate for 7th graders:9

    "It does not seem reasonable nor is there a need to require the meningococcal vaccine in Minnesota …

    • Meningococcal disease is rare in the U.S., including Minnesota

    • The bacteria [are] not easily transmittable

    • Vaccinating adolescents does not create herd protection in the community.

    • The vaccine does not reduce the seriousness of the disease

    • Routine vaccination of Meningococcal vaccine (MCV4) is not cost-effective."

    Rates of meningococcal disease in the U.S. are at a historic low. Cases decreased more than 60 percent from 1998 to 2007,10 and in 2013, the CDC reported there were about 550 total cases of meningococcal disease reported in the U.S., which is an incidence rate of 0.18 cases per 100,000 persons.11

    In other words, meningococcal disease is relatively rare. In 2011, Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of NVIC, explained some of the concerns about adding meningococcal vaccines to the U.S. vaccine schedule.

    Be Informed About the Meningococcal Strains Included in Each Vaccine

    In 2000, the CDC recommended that all college freshmen get a dose of meningococcal vaccine that contains four strains (A, C, W-35 and Y). In 2005, they also recommended that all 11-year-olds receive the MCV4 vaccine. However, strain B, a type that is not included in MCV4 vaccine, is associated with more than 50 percent of meningococcal cases and deaths. In children under the age of 5, strain B is responsible for up to 70 percent of meningitis cases.

    In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a meningococcal vaccine that includes strain B, but the vaccine showed lower-than-expected results when tested on college campuses. The vaccine (4CMenB) was administered during an outbreak at Princeton University in 2013 (before it was approved for use in the U.S.).

    Out of the nearly 500 college students who received two doses of the vaccine, 34 percent had no immune response to the outbreak strain, according to a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).12

    Many People Are Asymptomatically Colonizing and Are Carriers of Meningococcal Organisms

    According to the NEJM, at any given time about 5 percent to 10 percent of Americans are asymptomatically colonizing meningococcal organisms in their nasal passages and throats.13 Globally, the numbers of asymptomatic carriers may be higher, depending upon the country.

    While this may sound like a reason to increase vaccination, being an asymptomatic carrier actually boosts the person's innate immunity to invasive meningococcal infection. This is doubly beneficial for women of child-bearing age, because women with innate immunity are able to transfer maternal antibodies to their newborns, which protects them until they can make their own antibodies.

    "By the time American children enter adolescence, the vast majority have asymptomatically developed immunity that protects them," NVIC explains.14 In contrast, any protection provided by meningococcal vaccination decreases over time, which is why a booster dose is recommended for children at age 16, following the first dose at age 11 or 12. The CDC notes:15

    "Available data suggest that protection from meningococcal conjugate vaccines decreases in many teens within [five] years, which highlights the importance of the 16-year-old booster dose so that teens maintain protection during the ages when they are most at risk for meningococcal disease. Early data on serogroup B meningococcal vaccines suggest that protective antibodies also decrease fairly quickly after vaccination."

    Recommending the vaccine be given at age 11, when children are generally at low risk and knowing any given protection will decrease before the age when they may need it (living in crowded living conditions in college or in the military increases the risk), is therefore highly questionable.

    Meningococcal Disease on the Decline Prior to the Use of Meningococcal Vaccines

    The CDC further notes that meningococcal disease is at an historic low in the U.S. but not because of routine vaccination:16

    "Rates of meningococcal disease have been declining in the United States since the 1990s, with much of the decline seen before the routine use of meningococcal vaccines. In addition, serogroup B meningococcal disease has continued to decline even though vaccines were not available to help protect against it until the end of 2014."

    As far as using the argument of herd immunity for vaccinating all middle-schoolers, the CDC itself notes, " … [D]ata suggest meningococcal conjugate vaccines … do not provide protection to the larger, unvaccinated community through herd immunity."17

    It's true that the disease can be deadly: It's fatal in about 10 percent to 15 percent of cases. In about 11 percent to 19 percent of cases, long-term or permanent health problems, including loss of limbs, deafness, nervous system problems or brain damage will result.18 However, this is not a disease that's typically transmitted just by standing next to someone who has it.

    Meningococcal bacteria cannot live outside the human body very long, so it's not as easily transmitted as, say, a cold virus. Infection occurs via the exchange of saliva, such as sharing a toothbrush or kissing — not from standing next to someone in an elevator.

    So the risks of mandated, one-size-fits-all meningococcal vaccination policies need to be carefully reassessed, while researchers should be focusing on why certain people seem to be more susceptible to meningococcal disease than others. According to NVIC:19

    "A small minority of individuals, who have genetic and other unknown biological factors … [that] prevent them from naturally developing protective circulating antibodies, are up to 7,000 times more likely to get severe invasive meningococcal disease at some point in their lives."

    Children, adolescents and young adults may further minimize their risk of meningococcal disease by not sharing utensils, cups and other personal items, like toothbrushes, with others. And, as always, the key to avoiding infections is to maintain a strong immune system.

    The basic steps to keeping your immune system healthy are positive lifestyle choices such as proper diet, stress management, high-quality sleep and exercise, with an emphasis on eating clean, whole foods (organic, pasture-raised and, preferably, locally sourced).

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (10th January 2017), Hervé (10th January 2017)

  21. Link to Post #151
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,245
    Thanks
    57,343
    Thanked 90,635 times in 14,939 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Finally, something may change:


    Trump asks vaccine skeptic to lead commission on vaccination safety

    By Ben Kamisar and Jordan Fabian - 01/10/17 02:48 PM EST


    Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a noted vaccine skeptic, has accepted President-elect Donald Trump's offer to chair a commission to investigate vaccine safety, Kennedy told reporters Tuesday.

    Kennedy told reporters in the lobby of Trump Tower in Manhattan about the forthcoming position after a meeting with the president-elect.

    "He asked me to chair a commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity ... I said I would," he said.

    "President-elect Trump has some doubts about the current vaccine policies and he has questions about it. His opinion doesn't matter, but the science does matter and we ought to be reading the science and we ought to be debating the science."

    He added that Trump called him to request the meeting and that he wants to ensure that vaccines are "as safe as they possibly can be."

    Kennedy, son of the famous attorney general and nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, is a vocal critic of vaccines and regularly expresses concerns that certain preservatives in vaccines could cause developmental disorders or other negative side effects.

    He told a Sacramento audience in 2015 that drug companies can "put anything they want in that vaccine and they have no accountability for it." Later that night, he also floated a connection between vaccines and autism, while calling the effects of vaccines a "holocaust."

    [...]

    For the pro-vaccine propaganda, see the rest of the article: http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare...ination-safety


    Related:

    Last edited by Hervé; 10th January 2017 at 23:04.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  22. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Ewan (11th January 2017), JRS (16th January 2017), onawah (11th January 2017), Paul (11th January 2017), ponda (11th January 2017), Sammy (11th January 2017)

  23. Link to Post #152
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Wow! That is nothing short of miraculous!

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Hervé (11th January 2017), Paul (11th January 2017)

  25. Link to Post #153
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    RFK Jr – Is He The Best Man For the Vaccine Commission Job? Maybe – Maybe Not…

    (There are other good points in this article, but I don't agree with Bolen's hard-sell Republican attitude or his premise that RFK Jr. might not be a good person for this commission. Though I agree it would be great to have some military people involved who have seen the damage vaccines did to soldiers, Democrats will likely be the most difficult to convince when it comes to the deadliness of vaccines, but if they will believe anyone, I think they will believe a Kennedy.)

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    http://bolenreport.com/rfk-jr-is-he-...ybe-maybe-not/

    Quote President Trump has been putting together leadership teams to deal with the massive damage liberal Democrats have inflicted on the US with their corrupt, money-grubbing, anti-family, fake environmentalism, and destruction of the American middle class in favor of globalization policies.

    America, on November 8th, 2016, rejected all of this liberal crap, and called for major change. Trump is delivering…

    But let’s focus on Bobby Kennedy to head a Vaccine Commission…

    The FIRST Thing:

    Yes, RFK Jr is, undoubtedly a good, honorable, man who believes in his political positions. Personally I like what he is, and represents.

    But, and it is a VERY big BUT, he is a Democrat, albeit a bit different, for sure, than the Clinton/Obama/Richard Pan/Anthony Weiner scum-lifes. But still, a Democrat.

    I’d feel a LOT better about him if he’d just switch political parties right now – and announce himself as a Republican to do this job.

    Why? Democrats simply do not have real credibility in America right now – they are what they are.

    In fact, using RFK Jr. in a leadership role might give the wrong message to Americans, perhaps even confusing them, a little, about what liberal Democrats really are – and the destruction they want, and have planned, for America.

    Like it or not, the Democratic Party firmly established, during the 2016 presidential election process EXACTLY what it was, and is. It offered CLEAR choices to Americans – and it lost BIG TIME.

    Election 2106 pointed out that – America is NOT interested in having its children’s genders confused in some “Common Core” propaganda ploy. Nor are we interested in having all of our economy shipped to the Third World, our borders invaded by questionables, endless wars overseas, or our children vaccinated into vegetable status..

    Liberal Democrats, and their philosophy, have been thoroughly rejected…

    More, there is California – solidly controlled by the liberal “The State controls you completely..” idea of government. The Trump Team is going to have to SMACK California hard to get rid of this kind of anti-American thinking. There is no question that California is being re-designed as an example of what the US would have become under “Empress” Hillary.

    Remember that it is the California liberal Democrats that passed a Mandatory Vaccination (SB277) law forcing school age children to be forcibly injected with un-tested Made-in-China vaccines – all arranged by Hillary Clinton.


    Now, of course, the California liberal Dems are arranging new legislation to COMPLETELY take California children away from parents and make them all wards of the State – with SB18.

    California Dems, quietly, as of January 1st 2017, legalized child prostitution, claiming that those children need “counseling” not “arrest.”

    I suspect we will soon see a law where the California Dems will create a new State Agency to take 80% of a California child prostitute’s income to provide that ”counseling.”

    Trump’s team is going to have to step in, in California. California Democrats are in for a hard ride – and it is justified.

    RFK Jr, I’m sure, is a good guy, and competent, but… He IS a registered Democrat…

    I’m not sure Americans would feel secure with that…

    I’d be more confident…

    I’d feel a lot more confident that something could get done if Trump appointed one of those 200+ Generals or Admirals that Obama fired for not gay-ing up the military as fast as the liberal Dems wanted….

    Why one of those? That’s an easy one. We tend, these days, to focus on childhood vaccine issues – and they are certainly important, BUT, let’s not forget what happened to our soldiers during the 1990-91 Gulf wars where those soldiers were unwitting guinea-pigs for Big Pharma’s“Experimental Vaccines.” 250,000 out of 697,000 soldiers (36%) now have Gulf War Syndrome.

    Yeah, you read that right – 36%.


    From Wikipedia:

    Gulf War syndrome (GWS), also known as Gulf War illnesses(GWI), is a chronic and multisymptomatic disorder affecting returningmilitary veterans and civilian workers of the 1990–91 Gulf War.[1][2][3]A wide range of acute and chronic symptoms have been linked to it, including fatigue, muscle pain, cognitive problems, rashes anddiarrhea.[4] Approximately 250,000[5] of the 697,000 U.S. veterans who served in the 1991 Gulf War are afflicted with enduring chronic multi-symptom illness, a condition with serious consequences.[6]

    From 1995 to 2005, the health of combat veterans worsened in comparison with nondeployed veterans, with the onset of more new chronic diseases, functional impairment, repeated clinic visits and hospitalizations, chronic fatigue syndrome-like illness,posttraumatic stress disorder, and greater persistence of adverse health incidents.[7]

    According to a report by the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America,veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan may also suffer from the syndrome.[8]

    Suggested causes have included depleted uranium, sarin gas, smoke from burning oil wells, vaccinations, combat stress and psychologicalfactors.[6] The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) refers to the condition as Gulf War Veterans’ Medically Unexplained Illnesses.[9] (The VA states: “We prefer not to use the term ‘Gulf War Syndrome’ when referring to medically unexplained symptoms reported by Gulf War Veterans. Why? Because symptoms vary widely.”)

    Gulf War Syndrome is “Vaccine Damage” and everyone knows it…

    I’m sure that most of the Generals and Admirals will remember what happened to their troops in 1990-91- and the COVERUP that went with it. Those Generals and Admirals were probably much lower in the military ranks at that time, and would be somebody who REALLY gets what’s happening with the vaccine situation… for it happened to their soldiers, and their friends, right in front of them.

    Those military people probably went through the same kind of situation parents of autistic children go through once some sleazy pediatrician loads up their little one with nine to fourteen vaccines all at once, and the 108 degree fevers start.

    Do you think one of those former military commnders would be somebody, while running a vaccine investigation, that would consider it proper, and informative, to hang pro-vaxxers like Paul Offit, Poul Thorsen, David Gorski, Richard Pan, by their heels in a cell in Guantanamo Bay until the vaccine investigation becomes fruitful?

    I’d be hopeful…

    My point here is that Bobby Kennedy Jr, although a nice guy, might not be tough enough, ruthless enough, to hover drones armed with Hellfire Missiles over vaccine manufacturers main offices… (so-to-speak).

    Just a thought…

    The SECOND thing:

    Let’s ask the question: “Just what should a Vaccine Safety Commission be looking at?”

    So far I’m just hearing about the CDC being investigated – and that’s NOT HARDLY ENOUGH… There are many more issues of vaccine safety. Let’s look at them by categories – Safety and Effectiveness…

    Safety?

    There is NO SUCH thing as safety in vaccines, at all. Claims of safety are a hoax. Keep reading.

    (1) Vaccine Manufacturing – “Empress” Hillary arranged for all childhood vaccines to be manufactured in China by one of the newly operating thirty-four Chinese factories – and had all of those pre-approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) so that there are ABSOLUTELY NO INSPECTIONS, OF ANY KIND, OF CHILDHOOD VACCINES COMING INTO AMERICA being made.

    No one, probably not even the Chinese manufacturer, knows what actually goes into those little tubes, nor even what those little tubes are actually made of. And, it appears, no one in the US government cares…

    I don’t feel good about that at all. Do you?

    (2) Vaccine Distribution – There is no distributions system what-so-ever for childhood vaccines imported into this country. Most vaccines require refrigeration – and there is no system at all to see that they are refrigerated, or protected in any way. why? There is no requirement. And, it appears, no one in the US government cares…

    (3) Vaccine Testing – We always hear from some government spokesperson that Vaccines are thoroughly tested. Is it true?

    No, it is not true. Mostly, “testing” is a bad joke.

    What the US Food and Drug Agency (FDA) says and what it really does are two different things. Below is what the FDA says:

    “How does FDA assess the safety of vaccines?

    Vaccines undergo rigorous and extensive testing to determine their safety and effectiveness. Highly trained scientists and medical personnel at FDA carefully review all of the information in a marketing application before a vaccine can be approved for use by the public.

    Following approval, FDA also carefully monitors the quality of vaccines—all manufactured lots must pass tests before they can be used. And as with all manufacturers of medical products, vaccine manufacturers must follow strict manufacturing standards. In addition, FDA conducts routine inspections of manufacturing sites.

    FDA also works closely with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to monitor reports of side effects (adverse events) of vaccines. FDA and CDC take all reports seriously, and work together to evaluate and address any potential problems.”

    But, in actuality, NONE of this actually happens, except the first thing – “review all of the information in a marketing application before a vaccine can be approved for use by the public.”

    EVERYTHING else NEVER happens. Manufacturers are completely on their own to do whatever they want once the vaccine is approved. The Clinton Foundation arranged the non-testing.

    But the real questions here, about what the FDA actually tests for are:

    (A) Thoroughly tested for what? Profitability? Cheapness to make? Correct spelling on the label? Do they actually do ANYTHING at all? Are they an attractive color?

    They certainly are NOT tested for safety – it even says they are notright on the labels.

    Scared for your children yet?

    (B) They are NOT TESTED by batch, after manufacturing, to see if the intended ingredients are present, nor to see if any unintended ingredients are presents.

    Even more scared? You should be. The claims of “testing” are a hoax…

    (C) Individual Vaccines are NOT REALLY tested for Effectiveness. That claim is a fraud. They are, in reality, tested for “effectuality”. There is a BIG difference between the two words.

    Effective – adequate to accomplish a purpose; producingthe intended or expected result. (actual immunity)

    Effectuality – producing or capable of producing an intended effect. (produces something that MIGHT result in immunity).

    Manufacturers’ vaccines are tested to do one thing in the body. Then on the basis of that one thing happening the vaccine manufacturer makes the FALSE CLAIM that that “one thing” creates some kind of immunity in EVERYONE.

    (D) Vaccines are NOT tested in groups. Sleazy pediatricians want to stab children with nine to fourteen vaccines at once (the tax payments are due on the Aspen condo). There has NEVER been any testing done to determine what effects multiple vaccines have on humans.

    (E) Vaccine testing is all smoke and mirrors. There really isn’t any real testing.

    Every few minutes some mainstream (fake news) media clown will claim that vaccines have saved humanity from infectious disease.

    Where’s the proof?

    In fact, the opposite is true. The totally stupid measles vaccine was invented 28 years AFTER measles was subdued in the US due to sanitation and proper nutrition. The measles vaccine did NOTHING. The official Public Health statistics don’t lie.

    I’ll make this simple. Watch a video just below produced by Richard Pierce Millner from Public Affairs Media. It is a simulated “debate” between a pro-vaxxer named Paul Offit and a REAL scientist named Boyd Haley. Offit is the vaccine spokesperson who claims that “any child can take 10,000 vaccines at once.”

    The video, says it all…

    Haley vs. Offit: A Virtual Debate about Vaccines, The Greatest Medical Controversy of Our Time



    The Third Thing…

    The Pro-Vaxxer Propaganda and Psy-Ops Operation…

    Everyone concerned about vaccines has faced one aspect, or another of the pro-vaxxer Propaganda and Psy-Ops Operation. Careers have been ruined, people threatened JUST BECAUSE they voiced a legitimate concern.

    Any investigation of so-called “Vaccine Safety” needs to include a thorough expose of this group – who funds them, who trains them, heading towards their arrest, imprisonment, and impoverishment.

    There are those of us who can map out their networks including mainstream media.

    The Fourth Thing…

    The vaccine marketing team, nationwide, is the State and County Health Departments. This is totally wrong.

    The Health Departments have gotten big government fat over vaccines promotion commissions, and they have CEASED to be interested in protecting Public Health.

    Pubic Health management could stumble over hundreds of vaccine damaged kids, not batting an eye, on their way to picking out their new Audi, BMW, baby Mercedes, Lexus, etc. from that vaccine percentage money generated.

    This has to be stopped…

    In summary…

    Examining the vaccine problem is not a simple job involving the CDC.

    Is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tough enough to get the REAL job that needs to be done, done?

    Maybe, maybe not… let’s ask him…

    Stay tuned…

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (15th January 2017)

  27. Link to Post #154
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    CDC “Spider” Scientists attack the CDC, blow the lid off
    1/15/17
    by Jon Rappoporthttps://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/01/15/cdc-spider-scientists-attack-the-cdc-blow-the-lid-off/

    Quote There is a group of anonymous scientists at the US Centers for Disease Control—they call themselves the Spider Group—Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research. They have penned a letter to the CDC’s chief of staff, Carmen S. Villar:

    Here is the explosive accusation they make:

    “We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.”

    “Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right.”

    “We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units. These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.”

    I have written at length about another whistleblower at the CDC, William Thompson, a long-time researcher who, in August of 2014, confessed in writing to massive fraud (archive here). He admitted that, in a study on the safety of the MMR vaccine, he and his colleagues literally threw vital sheets of data into a garbage can. The study then gave a free pass to the vaccine, claiming it had no connection to autism—when in fact it did. Thompson is the subject of the film, Vaxxed (trailer).

    Now with this letter, we see that other scientists at the CDC are blowing the lid off internal corruption at their Agency.

    If, in fact, President-elect Trump gives the green light for an independent investigation of the CDC, as press outlets are now reporting, and if he appoints Robert Kennedy Jr. to head up that panel, as Kennedy claims, we are going to see a large number of hidden facts emerge from the secretive halls of the CDC.

    Because this Spider Group is anonymous, I wanted to make sure their letter is real. I contacted reporter Carey Gillam (twitter), who has been covering the story. I received this reply: “I was able to authenticate the letter by contacting CDC’s public affairs office and asking them directly about it after I received it from internal CDC sources.”

    You can read the full Spider Group’s letter here at US Right To Know. (More on the letter by Carey Gillam here.)

    And now I write a letter to them, so they can deepen their investigation.

    Dear Spider Group:

    I commend you on making an important start. You’re on the right road. As a reporter who has covered the CDC for many years, I offer you three suggestions. This short list is by no means exhaustive. I’m just pointing to a few areas where your own research will yield very rich and fertile results.

    ONE: SWINE FLU FRAUD.

    Let me take you back to the late summer of 2009, and the Swine Flu epidemic, which was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?

    The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.

    At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

    The CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

    What was the Agency up to?

    Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

    Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

    Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it and, in the end, no broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

    —end of interview excerpt—

    It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

    That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

    But it gets even worse.

    Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

    Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

    Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

    In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

    There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

    Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

    TWO: THE CDC BUYS MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF VACCINES AND, AT THE SAME TIME, HEADS UP RESEARCH ON THE SAFETY OF VACCINES. EXPLOSIVE STRUCTURAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

    If you wanted to buy a product, and the main source of research on the product was the company selling it, would you automatically assume the product was safe and effective?

    But you see, that’s the just the beginning of the problem. Suppose the company’s research was cited thousands of times in the press, as the authoritative standard of proof—and anyone who disputed that research was labeled a conspiracy theorist and a quack and a danger to the community and an anti-science lunatic.

    Would you begin to suspect the company had some awesome media connections? Would you suspect some very powerful people were backing the company?

    This is exactly the situation that exists at the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Read these two quotes:

    “The government’s Vaccine for Children Program (a CDC organization) purchases vaccines for about 50 percent of children in the U.S.” (The Atlantic, February 10, 2015)

    “The CDC currently spends over $4 billion purchasing vaccines [annually] from drug makers…” (Health Impact News, October 24, 2016)

    However, the CDC is also the gold standard for research on the safety and efficacy of vaccines. It turns out an unending stream of studies on these subjects. And the results of those studies are dutifully reported in the mainstream press.

    Do you think, under any circumstances, the CDC would publish data showing vaccines are ineffective and dangerous? They’d be cutting their own throats.

    “Well, we spend $4 billion a year buying vaccines from drug companies, but guess what? These vaccines are often dangerous…”

    Every time you read about a CDC study on vaccines, keep this obvious (and clearly illegal) conflict of interest in mind.

    THREE: MASSIVE OVERESTIMATE OF FLU DEATHS IN THE US, IN ORDER TO PUSH THE FLU VACCINE.

    In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.

    Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):

    “[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”

    Boom.

    You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

    This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

    But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

    Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

    Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

    This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.

    However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.

    In other words, it’s all promotion and hype.

    “Well, uh, we say that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it’s closer to 20. However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”

    The CDC must turn out a steady stream of outrageous lies about the need for vaccines. If they didn’t, they’d have no way to justify the billions of dollars they spend every year buying the vaccines from drug companies.

    So, Spider Group, don’t stop now. Deepen your probe. Become true heroes for honest research, expose the deep roots of corruption in your Agency, and do the right thing for the American people you’re sworn to serve.
    Episode One of Vaccines Revealed is on youtube, at least for now:

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (15th January 2017), raregem (19th January 2017)

  29. Link to Post #155
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Robert F Kennedy Jr: CDC an “edifice of fraud”
    by Jon Rappoport
    January 16, 2017
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...fice-of-fraud/
    Quote Robert Kennedy, Jr. “All the things that I do are bent on forcing this [vaccine] debate out into the open—because once the science is in the open, the CDC’s position is so fragile, it’s an edifice of fraud, fraud stacked upon fraud, so high and so wobbly, that even a slight breeze of public scrutiny will topple it.”

    Kennedy states that President Trump has appointed him to head up a task force investigating vaccine safety. The above quote indicates Kennedy, would, if given the green light, probe much more than the use of mercury in vaccines—his main topic of interest thus far.

    This would be a very good thing. The CDC is most certainly an edifice of fraud. It has concealed many of its crimes over the years.

    If he hasn’t already, Kennedy should make contact with an anonymous group of scientists at the CDC who call themselves ‘Spider’. They have written a letter to the CDC chief of staff accusing the agency of widespread “unethical practices…influenced and shaped by outside parties…[that] threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.” (More on Spider here.)

    In my recent open letter to Spider, I presented three shocking areas of fraud at the CDC that they should expose:

    Swine Flu, a dud and phony “epidemic,” presented as a dire global threat requiring vaccination;

    A structural conflict of interest, in which the CDC buys billions of dollars of vaccines and, at the same time, carries out many studies assessing vaccine safety—with this much money on the line, the Agency would never, under any circumstances, admit vaccines are dangerous;

    A massive overestimation of annual flu deaths in the US, in order to push the necessity of the flu vaccine.

    In this second memo, I present two more shocking areas which should receive the immediate attention of the dissident Spider scientists at the CDC, and Mr. Kennedy:

    ONE: THE CASE OF JULIE GERBERDING.

    On August 27, 2014, CDC scientist William Thompson came out of the shadows and revealed that he had participated in a major scientific fraud:

    Ten years earlier, he and his co-authors had published a study claiming there was no MMR-vaccine connection to autism. They had omitted vital data which contradicted that finding.

    The MMR vaccine was increasing the risk of autism. Thompson knew it. So did his co-authors. They buried that chilling fact.

    Before their fake study was published, Thompson wrote to the head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, informing her that, at an upcoming conference, he would be “presenting the summary of our results from the Metropolitan Atlanta Autism Case-Control Study [and]…I will have to present several problematic results relating to statistical associations between the receipt of MMR vaccine and autism.”

    In other words, Thompson was ready to blow the whistle on the MMR vaccine-autism connection. He received no reply from CDC Director Gerberding, and his presentation at the conference was canceled.

    Fast forward: in 2009, Gerberding left the CDC.

    She eventually went to work as the president of the vaccine division at Merck.

    Merck. Manufactures. The. MMR. Vaccine.

    Get it?

    TWO: OVERWHELMINGLY, FLU IS NOT FLU. THEREFORE, EVEN PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FLU VACCINE ARE BEING DECEIVED.

    Peter Doshi, PhD, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.

    As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

    This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.

    So they don’t have the flu.

    Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.

    The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.

    The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

    Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

    “…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.

    “…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”

    Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

    So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off. The CDC is supposed to be doing an accurate count of case numbers of diseases in the US. They’re lying and covering up the facts.

    —Those of you in the Spider group of rebel scientists at the CDC, get busy. There are many more instances of massive corruption at your Agency. Dig in. Don’t let the American people down.

    Go all the way.

    You, too, Mr. Kennedy.

    Jon Rappoport

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (16th January 2017)

  31. Link to Post #156
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Why I Keep Criticizing the liberal Democrats on a Health Care newsletter..
    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    http://bolenreport.com/why-i-keep-cr...re-newsletter/
    Quote In California, the liberal Democrats in the California legislature just hired former Attorney General “Fast and Furious” Eric Holder, at a rate of $25,000 per month, to defend them, as they say, against Trump’s attack – and Trump doesn’t even take office until January 20th, 2017…

    In short, the California Democrat legislators know full well that “Hellfire” is coming their way over a number of issues.

    For my articles involving politics I have received criticism about my focus on liberal Democrats – some from reasonable people, some from the very self-entitled I talk about. Be assured I am NOT stopping. I am finger-pointing. It’s time…

    I have found, of late, that liberal Democrats believe they are beyond criticism. They are, without doubt, in actual shock that the American Public massively rejected their political message in Election 2016. They are going so far as to claim that Donald Trump is not a legitimate President, blah, blah, blah…

    But, in California, we are going to see some things happen on many different issues and Trump will be using the US Attorney General and the Sacramento US Prosecutor’s office – rightfully so. That’s why the California legislature is separately lawyering up.


    California liberal Democrat State Senator Richard Pan with Santa Barbara County Health Department official Charity Dean who wants any doctor who issues vaccine exemptions investigated and prosecuted by the Medical Board.
    The issue I, Tim Bolen, am concerned with MOST is the Mandatory Vaccine (SB277) legislation carried, and passed, by those liberal Democrats in California.

    I want the Trump appointed US Prosecutors to look at the fact that the bill’s proponents KNEW, or should have known, that childhood vaccines were (1) Made in China with NO quality control testing at all, (2) There is no after manufacture testing to determine what was actually offered, (3) There is NO distribution system to keep those vaccines safe during transport and storage, (4) There are NO tests to determine whether those vaccines actually are effective, (5) Some of those legislators actually conspired with California Health Department officials to attack Medical Doctors (MDs and DOs) that write vaccine exemptions for health reasons.

    In short, those California legislators, and Health Department officials KNEW that Vaccines were EXTREMELY Dangerous, and of doubtful effectiveness, and for money, and/or other gratuities, made childhood vaccines MANDATORY.

    The amount of damage done to California children has not yet been calculated – but I want the “Death Penalty” on the table right from the start.

    But what incident turned me, Tim Bolen, in to a liberal Democrat basher?

    It was November 1st, 2015 when I put the Political Correctness (PC) rule out to pasture. Something important had happened that woke me up that day. I was writing about the SB 277 (Mandatory Vaccination) legislation process. I was assembling and publishing an article titled “I like the Way the Vaccine Argument is Going… Both Nationally, and in California…”

    The quote below is from that article. It was the third paragraph of the quote that made me stop in realization of what the California Democratic Party had become. Presidential election 2016 made that realization even more clear.

    And it ain’t pretty…


    “The early opposition to Pan’s (SB277) foray was incredibly naive, actually believing that if they went to the Democratic Party controlled California Legislature, and explained the situation, that it would all go away. Thousands of parents, many with their vaccine damaged children in tow, showed up in the legislative hallways, attended hearings, made phone calls, wrote letters, actually believing that the process of government they’d learned in school actually worked.

    Rallies and hearings, more rallies and hearings, and even more rallies and hearings, in both houses of the California legislature showed those in opposition a glimpse of the reality of the California Democratic Party. Did the legislature listen – well, yes they did listen, but just not to those people. They were listening to the pharma lobbyists who were stuffing wads of hundred dollar bills into their pockets.

    Worse though, was something far more shocking to these family units concerned about the damage to their children. Right in the middle of the hearings, with all of these parents there in Sacramento, the Democratic legislature took the day off, I kid you not, to celebrate Gay Pride Week. Instead of looking, carefully, I guess, at what vaccines do to children, the Dems, instead, shaved off their body hair, oiled themselves up, slipped into their Speedos, and pranced down to Sacramento Gay Bars, where they could dance around the Gay Pole with their REAL constituents – the ones they understand, and serve the needs of…”

    It was VERY clear that day that California Democratic legislators CARED NOT AT ALL for the plight of families. Democrats as a political party, are anti-family… Hillary Clinton described family-types as “Deplorables…”

    Nothing has changed since then…

    I have to laugh when I read that there are going to be demonstrations at the Trump Presidential Inauguration.

    Apparently George Soros has kicked in another 100 million bucks to fund and hire protestors like he did for the pre-election Trump Rallies. Look how well all THAT worked. Frankly, it just cranked up the Trump election network a couple of dozen notches.

    Demonstrations? Threats of death? Harassing entertainers? Anybody notice that 10,000 “bikers” have decided to head for Washington to DEFEND Trump? Soros, his minions, and his wanna-be protestors, should be VERY AFRAID. Why? It would be a very good idea to take a look at what makes up the average American “biker” these days.

    “Bikers,” these days, are primarily military combat veterans – and they are angry at the Clinton/Obama/DNC treatment of them, after their return from three or four combat tours – combat tours where they became accustomed to using extreme violence to achieve their objectives. And, combat veterans come in every color…

    As Trump said during the campaign “America treats illegal aliens better than returning veterans…” Trump got America’s attention with that statement alone. I think it was that moment when I realized he was going to win, not only the Republican nomination, but the Presidency. Why?

    Because he was right…

    The man had identified, and spoke out for, a gut issue. And he continued to identify MORE gut issues, and speak out about them – things Americans were talking about in their private places. Trump won – and now he is starting a process to actually fix those problems.

    America has a lot of problems…

    Yes, this is a health care newsletter…

    Right from the start of the presidential election campaign I saw Donald Trump addressing the very health care issues that Millions of Health Freedom Fighters, just like me, have been addressing for years.

    It was like Donald Trump had spent twenty hours reading back articles of the BolenReport. He was sounding like me (maybe a little nicer).

    Health care in the US is in shambles – and it isn’t just about ObamaCare. Junking ObamaCare and replacing it with something that works, is going to be a HUMONGOUS project.

    What is Trump going to do? You can get a hint of his plan by watching the first five minutes of his press conference – the one where he pointed out that CNN was “Fake News…”

    I had to play that segment three separate times – it was like I, Tim Bolen, was his speech writer.

    It is NOT time for me, or any other American to shut up about what has been going on, and what needs to happen.


    Who are “The Deplorables” now?
    The US Vaccine program is a hoax. And, liberal Democrat Hillary Clinton arranged for those vaccines to be manufactured in China with no inspections. Liberal Democrats across the US carried mandatory vaccine bills – but only won in California…

    The vaccine issue is a microcosm of what’s wrong with US health care. And US health care is a microcosm of what’s wrong with America. So, I will close with this…

    Stay tuned…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    SHARE THIS:

  32. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (17th January 2017)

  33. Link to Post #157
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    One of the saddest, but most telling vaccine injury stories I've seen, but at least it gets better..

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (19th January 2017), Flowerpunkchip (25th January 2017), RunningDeer (18th January 2017)

  35. Link to Post #158
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    10,759
    Thanks
    26,251
    Thanked 45,718 times in 9,343 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Why Are Liberal Democrats Trembling Over the Idea of a VACCINE SAFETY COMMISSION?
    Because Vaccines are Neither Safe Nor Effective…
    And an Empowered Federal Commission Would Reveal THAT In It’s First Month of Operation…
    And THEN What?

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    http://bolenreport.com/why-are-liber...ty-commission/

    Quote America has been awakened to the fact that the US Vaccine Program, both for children and adults, is a massive money-generating, but deadly, dangerous, hoax. Autism is but ONE of the problems vaccines cause.

    It is likely that the anti-vaxxer movement in the US steered the presidential election towards Donald Trump – there is so much interest.

    President Trump, before the inauguration, talked to Robert F. Kennedy Jr about he, Kennedy, heading up such a Vaccine Commission. Kennedy said he would. And, the liberal media began its shrill whining…

    A keening of fear…

    So let’s look at what will happen.

    Do Federal Commissions Have Any Real Power?

    Oh yeah – they certainly do.

    Historically, Commissions in the United States have played prominent roles in US decision making. They come in different colors and sizes, and can have different functions depending on how they are originally set up, and by whom. Below I’ll show you some samples…


    For example – it would be nice if the “Vaccine Safety Commission” could have Subpoena power, the ability to drag California liberal Democrat Senator Richard Pan into an interrogation session… (preferably in wrist and ankle chains).

    So, let’s Look at the Different Kinds of Federal Commissions Available For PRESIDENT Trump to Use…

    An article in CQ Researcher on Presidential Commissions says:

    Federal commissions may be classified in various ways:

    (1) as regulatory, advisory, or fact-finding, according to their character or function. The Interstate Commerce Commission illustrates the regulatory type, the Council of Personnel Administration the advisory type, and the Research Committee on Social Trends is an example of the fact-finding kind.

    (2) As permanent or temporary, according to their duration.

    (3) As executive, departmental, or statutory, according to the authority creating them. The Council of Personnel Administration, appointed by President Hoover on April 27, 1931, upon his own initiative; the Interdepartmental Board on Simplified Office Procedure, created by the Bureau of the Budget on May 16, 1924; and the Commission to Study and Review United States Policies in Haiti, authorized by joint resolution of Congress on February 6, 1930, are examples of these three types.

    (4) As administrative or policy determining, according as they call for administrative work, strictly speaking, or for the exercise of quasi-legislative, quasi-judicial, general policy determining functions. Instances of these two classes are the Veterans’ Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission.

    And (5) as official, private, and mixed, according to their composition. They may be composed of members serving full time and receiving compensation on the same basis as other officers of the government (the Tariff Commission), of private persons receiving no compensation and giving only a small part of their time to the work (the Board of Indian Commissioners), of members holding other offices under the government and by virtue of such offices being ex officio members of the board or commission (the Federal Oil Conservation Board), or of members representing combinations of these methods of selection. The National Timber Conservation Board, appointed December 5, 1930, has a mixed membership, three of its thirteen members consisting of the Secretaries of Commerce, Agriculture, and the Interior, who serve without additional compensation, and the other ten being persons appointed from private life with a view to their representing manufacturing, commercial, conservation, and scientific interests, who also serve without compensation and give only part of their time to the board.

    The article quoted above was written in 1931… Since then the use of Commissions has grown even more.

    The McGeorge Law Review Paints a Current Picture of Commissions…

    I love what their report says. Liberal Democrats reading the CQ Researcher on Presidential Commissions quote from 1931, and the McGeorge Law Review below are very rightfully afraid of what Trump is about to do. Why?

    Devastation is coming the pro-vaxxer way. It is inevitable.

    Just below is an excerpt from that McGeorge Law Review. It is the Table of Contents for the entire sixty-one page report I have linked to here. As you can see from the Table this report is an outline of how current Commissions are set up.

    If a Commission of this sort is set up, staffed by Trump picks, and run, it will ONLY result in the complete destruction of the US Childhood and Adult Vaccine Program.

    Why do I say that? Because the US Vaccine Program is a massive hoax. It cannot survive this kind of questioning and examination.

    Read the Table below – and you will see why…

    Special National Investigative Commissions: Essential Powers and Procedures (Some Lessons from the Pearl Harbor, Warren Commission, and 9/11 Commission Investigations)

    Lance Cole*

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    I. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………. 2

    II. SPECIAL NATIONAL INVESTIGATIVE COMMISSIONS: HISTORY AND CONTEXT ………………………………………… 3

    III. INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES OF THE ROBERTS COMMISSION, THE WARREN COMMISSION, AND THE 9/11 COMMISSION ……………………………….. 9

    A. The Roberts Commission and Pearl Harbor…………… 9

    B. The Warren Commission and the John F. Kennedy Assassination ……… 14

    C. The 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks……………………….. 26

    IV. RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES ………… 36

    A. Commission Members: Roles, Time Commitments, and Conflicts of Interest…………………………. 36

    B. Commission Staffing and Investigative Resources… 40

    C. Commission Funding, Timetables, and Deadlines…. 44

    D. Subpoena Power—Use and Enforcement………………. 46

    E. Witness Testimony-Essential Powers and Procedures…54

    F. Transparency and Public Access ……………………….. 59

    V. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………….. 61

    Any document that has to do with this investigation cannot be beyond our reach, [9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas H.] Kean said on Friday in his first explicit public warning to the White House that it risked a subpoena and a politically damaging courtroom showdown with the commission over access to the documents, including Oval Office intelligence reports that reached President Bush’s desk in the weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks.

    You can read the entire sixty-one page report here..

    This Vaccine Safety Commission Solution May Be Just a Trump Ploy To Rein In Big Pharma…

    And I am VERY comfortable with that. Pharma knows that a real Vaccine Safety Commission will find to their detriment, and that such a finding would lead to even more Commissions looking at their other activities. In a way Trump just made a power play.


    Trump’s message to Big Pharma – “Submit – or Else.” And, it is about time an American President told them that…

    If you look at Trump’s Pre-Inaugural Press Conference first five minutes you will hear references to the fact that most drugs are made in foreign countries (with NO quality control inspections) and that those drugs had better start being manufactured in the US from now on – providing jobs for American workers, and following US quality control procedures. Trump’s “Or Else” was very, very plain, and explicit. An Executive order BANNING drug advertising on Mainstream Media would literally CRUSH BOTH the liberal media and the pharmaceutical industry overnight…

    In the words of “A Team'” leader John “Hannibal” Smith – “I Love It When a Plan Comes Together…”

    So, Why Are Liberal Democrats Trembling Over the Idea of a VACCINE SAFETY COMMISSION?

    That is EASY to answer. All over America Big Pharma POURED tons of cash into the election prospects of liberal Democrats, not only in the California legislative elections – the sponsors of the Mandatory Vaccine (SB 277) are ROLLING in Pharma cash – but nationwide in presidential election 2016.

    And, they both lost… America voted for “America First…”

    There is that old saying – “Payback is a Bitch…“

    Stay tuned…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (23rd January 2017)

  37. Link to Post #159
    Great Britain Avalon Member Baby Steps's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th August 2014
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanks
    14,496
    Thanked 6,130 times in 1,210 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Some speculative pseudo-science for you....

    The suspicion being that the main factor in increased Autism rates is the Thimerosal (Mercury) in Vaccines.
    This is likely or an established fact according to whom you listen to. It is also claimed that there is a correlation between the victim’s ability to detoxify the mercury and post vaccination Autism rates.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	avpageview-2252011-92245-am.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	52.4 KB
ID:	34876

    But clearly this is not the only factor. See below-you encounter a large variance in autism rates between different USA states that presumably have similar vaccination rates.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2008_2009-autism-IDEA.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	84.8 KB
ID:	34874

    There must be other factors at play. So I started thinking about toxins , including Mercury and found the following:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Texas-autism-rates-toxins.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	108.8 KB
ID:	34875

    Clearly a correlation.

    Note: one can correlate organic food production rates with Autism, so this is not definitive.

    I then shot off at a tangent, and wondered whether glyphosate was a factor. My thinking was that the ability to remove ‘bad’ minerals is related to access to ‘good’ minerals. I knew that Glyphosate kills insects because it inhibits the absorbtion of minerals in their guts. I wanted to find out whether this would be true for larger animals, and whether it could MAKE MERCURY MORE HARMFUL.

    See the following:


    Click image for larger version

Name:	4421395_orig.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	54.3 KB
ID:	34877

    http://www.drvaughan.com/2014/02/nut...rn-health.html

    Quote Nutrition, Roundup® and Modern Health Epidemics


    It's hard to ignore the headlines. Obesity and diabetes have risen to epidemic proportions. Autism, infertility and Celiac disease are all on the rise, as are dozens, if not hundreds, of other conditions. Interestingly enough, this spike in the rates of many conditions like these began around 1974. That is the year Roundup went on the market. Since 2000 when it went off patent, it has been used increasingly worldwide.

    Roundup is a weed killer that contains glyphosate as its active ingredient. Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup, has long touted the safety of the herbicide. There are stories of salesmen drinking it to prove that point.

    Researchers are now finding the safety claims about Roundup to be false. Glyphosate interferes with many enzymes in the human body. It interferes with the body’s ability to detoxify environmental toxins. It chelates (read: deplete) trace minerals in both plants and animals. It damages healthy gut bacteria. It is estrogenic and causes breast tumors in rats that have been bred to mimic human breast cell responses. It damages human DNA.

    Farmers use Roundup to kill weeds, which are harmful to their crops. In the past, it couldn't be sprayed indiscriminately because it would destroy the crops as well. That's where GMOs (genetically modified organisms) came into play. Scientists began to genetically modify crop seeds to grow into plants that would be resistant to glyphosate. While the safety of GMO technology and seeds is hotly debated, this article does not address these issues. GMO seed development allowed farmers to spray their entire fields of Roundup ready or resistant crops without damage to the plants.

    In theory, this approach seemed like a good idea; however, it didn't take into account that a food supply sprayed with glyphosate might be harmful. It also didn’t take into account that Mother Nature cannot be fooled. Increasingly, weeds are developing resistance to Roundup and crops now have to be saturated with the herbicide to control the resistant weeds. 90% of GMO crops are Roundup resistant. Also, Roundup does damage the resistant plants. It binds up the minerals in the plants.

    To complicate matters, many Americans don’t hear about the negative effects of GMOs and glyphosate, because research into those effects has been actively suppressed in this country and abroad by the companies that create GMOs, most notably Monsanto. At every turn, Monsanto has interfered with research that explores the harmful effects of Roundup: refusing to provide seed to researchers, refusing to let farmers conduct experiments with the seed, infiltrating the government and the FDA, limiting what research is performed, blocking publication of negative research, and professional assassination of those scientists who dare to publish research that is not favorable to their business.

    In spite of the opposition, there are dedicated scientists working diligently to uncover and spread the word about the dangers of glyphosate and GMOs and how they're impacting our society. Most notably are Stephanie Seneff, PhD, a senior research scientist at MIT, Don Huber PhD, Emeritus Professor of Plant Pathology at Purdue University, Gilles-Eric Seralini PhD, Professor of Molecular Biology at the University of Caen in France and Judy Carmen PhD, lead researcher at Flinders University in Australia.

    Jeffrey Smith, executive director of the Institute for Responsible Technology, author of the books Seeds of Deception (2003) and Genetic Roulette (2007), and producer/director of the 2012 movie, Genetic Roulette, and many others like him are leading the charge for further research and for more sustainable, less toxic farming practices.

    After a closer look at the data that these researchers and others like them have been uncovering, it’s easy to see why there is such a growing push for the elimination of Roundup and GMO foods and, minimally, clear labeling of these foods.

    How widespread are GMO and glyphosate?

    GMOs and, therefore, glyphosate are ever-present in our daily diet—particularly in the United States, where Roundup is the No. 1 herbicide in use. Take a look at some of the crops (XX% of all CROP grown in USA is GMO):


    • Corn (88% of all corn grown in USA is GMO) fed to farm animals and used in processed foods. Also made into high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and corn oil
    • Soybeans (93%) fed to farm animals and used in processed foods. Includes soy bean oil
    • Cottonseed (94%) oil used in many processed foods and cotton made into clothes
    • Alfalfa (not known %) fed to dairy cows
    • Papaya from Hawaii (75%)
    • Canola (90%) oil for cooking and salad dressings
    • Sugar Beets (90%) fed to farm animals and 54% of “sugar” in processed foods
    • Squash- some yellow and zucchini
    • Milk (17%) dairy cows treated with Recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH))
    • Aspartame (100%) is a GMO
    There has been a huge expansion of GMO corn, soy, cotton, sugar beet and canola crops in the last decade, which has led to sharp increases in glyphosate usage. Even meat, eggs and dairy supplies contain GMO and glyphosate because livestock regularly consume GMO glyphosate-treated food.

    What about non-GMO foods and glyphosate?
    Completely separate from the use of glyphosate on GMO treated crops is the application of this herbicide just prior to harvest of numerous conventional non- GMO crops. Monsanto explains how to do this to control certain weeds AND to enhance yields at harvest. Monsanto recommends that Roundup be sprayed several days prior to harvesting wheat, barley, oats, canola, flax, peas, lentils, soybeans, and dry beans to enhance yield and dry up the seeds or beans. “This Preharvest Staging Guide provides information on how to maximize the efficacy and benefits of Roundup WeatherMAX® and Roundup Transorb® HC herbicides in a preharvest application.”

    After the publication of this manual, rice and sugar cane are also frequently sprayed preharvest to desiccate or dry out the plants and improve the harvest. The problem is that these Roundup products do not wash off if it rains. Just the opposite, other chemicals in the product, surfactants, enhance penetration of glyphosate inside the kernels or beans to be harvested. So every bite of these conventional non-GMO non organic foods or animal feeds will contain Roundup also.

    What’s the problem with Roundup?

    The reason there is concern about Roundup-treated crops is that glyphosate has numerous documented negative effects in the human body. Roundup is worse than glyphosate by itself since the surfactants in Roundup allow glyphosate to penetrate deeper into cells across cell membranes in plants, bacteria and animals.

    First, glyphosate inhibits enzymes in the shikimate pathway in plants, which is involved in the synthesis (or production) of the aromatic amino acids tyrosine and tryptophan. Monsanto has argued that glyphosate is safe for humans because we don't have a shikimate pathway. This is true, but it is a deceptive statement because our friendly gut bacteria, which exist in our bodies, do have this pathway!

    The human body depends on its gut bacteria, or gut microbiome, to supply it with these essential amino acids. They cannot be produced without them. When bacteria are disrupted by glyphosate and produce lower levels of these amino acids the impact is significant:
    • Tyrosine is converted into dopamine, then into norepinephrine, and in turn into epinephrine (adrenaline), and melanin. Without a sufficient supply of tyrosine, deficiencies occur in these three neurotransmitters and pigment, and can result in fatigue, obesity, ADD, ADHD, Parkinson's disease and skin cancer.
    • Tryptophan is converted into serotonin and melatonin. Without a sufficient supply of tryptophan, deficiencies occur in this neurotransmitter and hormone, and can result in food cravings, obesity, autism, Alzheimer's disease, depression, insomnia and violent behavior.
    • If the bacteria have a pathway blocked by glyphosate, their biochemistry shifts into producing toxins including ammonia.

    Second, Roundup (or glyphosate) is an organophosphate herbicide which inhibits other major human enzyme pathways: our CYP enzymes. This is a well-known effect of all organophosphate herbicides. The body’s CYtochrome P 450 enzymes detoxify environmental toxins (xenobiotics) and manufacture or modify sterols like vitamin D, cholesterol, cortisol, and sex hormones among other things. When these enzyme functions are compromised by glyphosate it may lead to imbalances in fertility, congenital defects, bile acid production, and detoxification of xenobiotics.

    Third, minerals like calcium, magnesium, manganese, zinc and iron bind to glyphosate. Glyphosate functions as a chelator. Plants sprayed with glyphosate are weakened by this and provide fewer minerals to humans or other animals that consume them. Calves and pigs that were still borne or died soon after birth, whose mothers were fed GMO Roundup ready feed, showed severe deficiencies of manganese in autopsy studies. Severe manganese deficiency is not compatible with life. Others believe that glyphosate also binds up consumed minerals in the gut; i.e., the minerals in food or in a mineral supplement never get absorbed ... the glyphosate binds it first.

    Fourth, glyphosate is toxic to many of the body’s friendly bacteria like Lactobacillus, E coli and Bacillus species. Pathogenic germs like Salmonella, Pseudomonas, Clostridium difficile (the germ that causes C diff diarrhea) and Clostridium botulinum (which causes botulism) are all resistant to glyphosate so they multiply and may cause illness in the gut and beyond. Glyphosate promotes yeast overgrowth also.

    Fifth, Roundup has estrogenic properties. Studies in France by Dr. Seralini in 2013 demonstrated that female rats developed larger numbers of breast tumors sooner when fed GMO corn sprayed with Roundup and non-GMO corn treated with Roundup compared to those who ate conventional non-GMO corn alone. Tumors started to show up in the fourth month. Monsanto had previously studied the exact same strain of rats under similar conditions but only ran the experiment for three months.

    Female pigs fed a combination of GMO corn and soy which contained the Bt toxin and Roundup ready GMO soy had 25% larger uteruses. True, these are animal studies, but this suggests human studies need to be done and a moratorium on the use of Roundup needs to be considered.

    Sixth, Roundup damages human DNA and human cells at very low concentrations. Glyphosate, by itself, damages human DNA and cells at slightly higher concentrations. The surfactants in Roundup help the glyphosate damage the cells at lower concentrations. In one of many studies, human oral mucosal cells, exposed to Roundup in concentrations of >40mg/l (parts per million: ppm), died within 20 minutes. DNA damage occurred after exposure to only 10mg/l (ppm) for 20 minutes. All of these concentrations were 450x below the recommended dilution for spraying in agriculture.

    In one of many animal species tested, Roundup exposure at low doses (36 ppm, 36 mg/L) for 30 min induces oxidative stress and activates multiple stress-response pathways in rat testicles leading to Sertoli cell death in young rat testes. These are the cells that produce sperm.

    Is glyphosate actually in human beings?
    Smaller amounts in the parts per billion (PPB) range have been found in human urine or blood. Research in Canada found glyphosate in 5% of blood samples taken from women undergoing surgery, up to the level of 93.6 ng/ml (ppb).

    A study in Iowa tested glyphosate concentrations in the urine of farming and non-farming families. Glyphosate was detected in the majority of samples, including more than 80% of the children’s urine samples. Both farming and non-farming families had similar levels. The levels of glyphosate ranged up to 5ng/ml or 5 ppb (parts per billion) for non-farm mothers and up to11 ng/ml for farm mothers.

    Researchers in Europe determined glyphosate levels in human urine collected from city dwellers in 18 different countries. 44 percent of the urine samples contained glyphosate, and 7 percent of the samples exceeded the reference cutoff for safety. Since participants were city dwellers who had never handled Roundup or herbicides, it is presumed that diet was their primary source of exposure to glyphosate.

    While these levels are lower than the toxic levels noted above, they are not trivial.

    This seems like a very tiny amount ... until you compare it with estradiol levels in premenopausal women who naturally have 20-280 picograms/ml (parts per trillion) in their blood. And thyroid hormone, freeT4 is 12 picograms/ml. What would we do without these hormones? Tiny amounts count.

    What symptoms and illnesses can be attributed to Roundup and glyphosate?
    The effects of glyphosate accumulate over time. Most toxicity studies are 90 days long. Three months is standard. This is too short to detect damage with Roundup. Research is starting to make connections. Here are the areas where noticeable correlations have been detected:

    Autism—There's no denying the glaring autism epidemic. Consider these statistics: In 1970, only 1 in 10,000 children were diagnosed with autism. By 2007, it was 1 in 150 children. Only two years after that, it was 1 in 100. Now, the most recent figures from 2013 show 1 in 50.

    Not only is it notable that autism diagnoses are increasing along with the growing prevalence of glyphosate usage, it can also be observed that many of the biomarkers for autism—such as disrupted gut bacteria, depleted serotonin and melatonin supplies, sulfur metabolite deficiencies, and zinc and iron deficiencies—are compatible with the damage wreaked by glyphosate.

    Digestive Disorders—Toxins like glyphosate can lead to an overgrowth of pathogens in the gut that release toxins. This can lead to inflammatory bowel disease, stomach ulcers, thinning of intestinal walls, Crohn’s disease, colitis, acid reflux disease, gluten and casein intolerance, Celiac disease and leaky gut.

    It's no surprise, then, of the increased instances of digestive disorders in children. Over the past several years, there has been a dramatic increase in the hospitalization of children with inflammatory bowel disease. There has also been a 40 percent increase in Crohn’s disease and a 71 percent increase in ulcerative colitis.

    Carman’s study in Australia, using pigs raised in the USA showed that GMO-fed female pigs were 2.2 times more likely to get severe stomach inflammation; the GMO-fed male pigs were 4 times more likely to develop severe stomach inflammation.

    Endocrine Disorders—The disruptions caused by glyphosates are known to lead to problems within the endocrine system. Since the 1970s, there has been a rise in diabetes that correlates closely with the rise in Roundup use. And, as discussed earlier, obesity is a common result of the amino acid depletion that occurs due to glyphosates. Obesity, of course, is a prime risk factor for diabetes.

    Infertility is another problem exacerbated by GMOs and, thus, glyphosates. Fertility rates are falling rapidly around the world. While certainly cultural changes play a role in these shifts, many experts believe that glyphosates are contributing to the problem. As noted above numerous studies have shown damage to sperm production in several species. And, in fact, it is well recorded that sperm counts are dropping worldwide.

    Even when fertility is achieved, glyphosates create a greater risk of birth defects. Glyphosate can up regulate retinoic acid. This issue with retinoic acid has long been linked to birth defects and anencephaly, a rare and devastating birth defect in which a baby is born without a full brain and skull.

    There are counties in Washington State that have an unusually high number of pregnancies affected by anencephaly. The areas where these births are occurring are also where large amounts of Roundup have been used.

    Cancer—Glyphosate's endocrine disruption can also promote breast cancer. It possesses estrogenic activity that can cause human hormone dependent breast cancer cells to proliferate.

    The Outlook on Roundup
    Roundup usage is growing worldwide. Along with it has been an increase in glyphosate-resistant weeds, which leads to an increase in the magnitude and frequency of Roundup applications.

    This isn't sustainable. 2, 4 D, a component of Agent Orange is now being considered for better weed control in the next generation of Roundup and 2,4 D ready plants. As the rates of serious diseases and birth defects increase, and as fertility decreases, the survival of the human race is at stake. As it stands now, glyphosate and GMO producers are allowed to continually block research and publication, particularly in the United States. Unlike safety protocols for drugs, there have been no human clinical trials of Roundup.

    So, what's the solution?

    Ultimately, we need to find a path to sustainable agriculture so that glyphosates can be removed from the market. However, the best thing to do right now is go organic. This is especially true for women who plan to become pregnant. And when you go organic, encourage everyone you know to do the same.

    Next month, we will discuss exactly how to reduce your exposure to these toxins and limit the damage from and enhance detoxification of glyphosate in the body using sauna, food and supplements.

    References:

    Presentation on Harmful Effects of Glyphosate-Roundup®, Dr. Stephanie Seneff at Wellesley College; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqWwhggnbyw

    ResponsibleTechnology.org; www.ResponsibleTechnology.org
    Here is where things get more speculative.

    Does MINERAL DEFICIENCY EXACERBATE MERCURY TOXICITY?

    http://www.evenbetterhealth.com/heav...ng-mercury.php



    Quote Mercury Poisoning Toxicity
    ________________________________________
    An In-depth Report on the Effects of Mercury Poisoning Toxicity
    by Dr. Thomas Nissen
    ________________________________________
    MERCURY: What kinds of symptoms does mercury cause?
    Symptoms of mercury toxicity are many and varied, since mercury can both reach and affect nearly every cell in the body! Systemic (overall) effects can occur for this reason. The particular symptoms you experience first depend on your own genetic weakest links and on other toxic suppressors. The answers to the following questions below address the type of symptoms that can occur.
    How does mercury toxicity affect the reproductive system?
    Reproductive effects can occur, such as infertility, miscarriage and prematurity. Mercury lowers zinc levels, which then lowers progesterone levels. Progesterone is needed to bring a pregnancy to term. Birth defects, especially involving the brain and learning ability, can be caused by mercury, as the metal can pass through both the placental barrier and the blood-brain barrier contrary to prior belief. Low libido (sex drive) and premenstrual syndrome (PMS) are examples of a downward spiral of problems whose root cause is mercury toxicity.
    Lowered progesterone levels can lead to infertility. PMS and infertility are common among many young female dental workers due at least in part to their mercury exposure. Male dental workers also suffer from infertility. Mercury lowers zinc levels, which in turn leads to lower testosterone (male hormone) levels.
    Can babies absorb mercury from their mothers?
    Mercury can cross the placental barrier, which screens out many harmful substances. This has been shown in both human and animal studies. Mercury is in fact, stored in the fetus before the mother. Mercury will also be transmitted to the infant via breast milk. Mercury from amalgam is stored in the breast milk and in the fetus at levels up to eight times that in the mother’s tissues.
    How is the immune system affected?
    It has been shown that mercury rapidly depletes the immune system. Mercury has been shown to induce auto-immune diseases. Mercury can cause an increase in the number and severity of allergies.
    What other types of symptoms are caused by mercury?
    Candida (yeast) overgrowth that is difficult to get rid of is also associated with mercury in the mouth. Mercury acts as an antibiotic, and, like medicinal antibiotics, it kills the friendly bacteria which help control yeast overgrowth.
    Any of these symptoms can affect almost anyone with amalgam fillings. Some people, however, are especially sensitive, or allergic.
    Replacement reactions, also called fight for site, occur when mercury (usually with a +2 charge) grabs the biological spaces which should be filled by necessary minerals. Symptoms that can be caused by a deficiency of minerals displaced by mercury include:
    • Magnesium: irregular heartbeat, receding gums
    • Iron: anemia
    • Copper: anemia, thyroid dysfunction, impaired digestion
    • Zinc: anorexia nervosa, loss of taste and smell, loss of appetite, low libido, PMS
    • Iodine: thyroid dysfunction
    Some digestive problems can be caused by parasite or bacterial infection such as helicobacter secondary to immune system suppression by mercury. Mercury, in effect, opens the door like the Trojan horse so that undesirables can come in.
    Mercury combines with bile and can cause bile from the gallbladder to become more alkaline, providing a favorable environment for parasites. These parasites can plug up the hepatic or bile duct so that needed digestive and other enzymes from the gallbladder, liver, and pancreas are not released. Gallbladder function then suffers.
    Mercury acts as an antibiotic, and was used in some medicines until safer alternatives came along for this purpose. In the body mercury also acts as an antibiotic, and like medicinal antibiotics it kills off the beneficial bacteria which repel parasites and aid in digestion.
    Yeast overgrowth with its attendant symptoms of fatigue, sweets cravings and vaginal infections is often traced to the antibiotic effect of dental mercury. Suspect this as a root cause when yeast is a continuing problem in spite of repeated treatment. The symptom (yeast overgrowth) will not likely go away until the root cause (mercury) is dealt with. The effect of dental mercury on normal gut flora is well documented.
    Thyroid problems or mercury toxicity?
    Endocrine problems such as low body temperature often improve rapidly when amalgam is removed, a sure sign that the amalgam was causing the problem in the first place. Normal body temperature is about 98.6 F orally.
    People reacting to amalgam components often have a temperature range of 96.2 to 97.6 degrees, which can rise to 98.2 in as little as one day after amalgam removal and to 98.6 soon afterward. A low body temperature is a sign of low thyroid function, and many people have mistakenly been given thyroid hormone to remedy a symptom caused by amalgam fillings.
    Synthetic thyroid hormone (thyroxin) can shut down the natural feedback cycle of the pituitary gland and its production of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH). This shutdown then adversely affects the rest of the endocrine system. It would be far better to correct the cause of the apparent thyroid malfunction by removing the fillings that are responsible for the low body temperature, rather than prescribing supplemental thyroid hormone.
    What are the mental symptoms of mercury toxicity?
    Since mercury is so soluble, it can be easily absorbed through the roof of the mouth, which is less than an inch from the posterior pituitary gland. Mental symptoms of toxicity affecting the posterior pituitary include:
    Depression, Timidity, Rage, Phobias, Anxiety, Lowered libido, Indecisiveness, Lack of self confidence, Compulsions, Mood swings
    Mercury tends to accumulate in all tisues, but especially in the brain. Within the brain, mercury is stored prefentially in the pituitary gland and hypothalamus.
    Accumulation in the brain leads to mental and nervous system effects such as brain fog, depression, vision difficulties, and others as listed above. Mental effects are among the most common due to mercury's special affinity for the brain. Mercury inhibits the effects of certain neurotransmitters:
    • Dopamine: controls pain, well-being
    • Serotonin: relaxation, sleep, well-being
    • Adrenaline: energy and stamina
    • Noradrenaline, melatonin: sleep cycles
    Inhibition of these neurotransmitters by mercury can account in part for the feelings of depression and loss of motivation.
    Other mental/neurological symptoms include:
    • General neurological symptoms
    • Mental illness
    • Demyelinization, which can lead to such diseases as multiple sclerosis (MS)
    • Developmental problems
    • Cerebral palsy
    • ALS (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig's disease)
    • Alzheimer's disease
    • Psychological problems, including loss of function and memory, anger and emotionality, and timidity
    How does mercury cause fatigue and lack of energy?
    Mercury binds to nitrogen and sulfur in proteins, oxygen from the lungs, sulfur from the liver's detoxification systems, and selenium from the colon. Lower levels of body tissue oxygen due to mercury's binding it may lead to:
    • Fatigue caused by low blood sugar secondary to low blood oxygen
    • Parasite infestation by setting up an anaerobic (less oxygen) environment, and by lowering the level of the good bacteria which fight off parasites
    • An anaerobic environment also favors the development of yeast infections and cancer, since yeast is a fermenting spore and cancer is a fermenting cell rather than a normal respiratory (oxygen using) cell
    Mercury binds with hemoglobin, which is responsible for oxygen transport to the tissues. This results in less oxygen reaching the tissues. The body attempts to compensate for this by increasing the amount of hemoglobin in the blood.

    A normal or increased hemoglobin (oxygen carrying) level combined with symptoms usually associated with low hemoglobin such as anemia are often indicative of mercury toxicity. Copper is also required to prevent anemia, and mercury can compete for copper's binding sites. A lowered hematocrit (red blood cell count) can be indicative of lowered blood copper levels.
    The terms hematocrit and hemoglobin, found routinely on blood test printouts, can be confusing. If blood is compared to a train carrying oxygen to where it is needed, hematocrit is a measure of the number of boxcars on the train (red blood cells), while hemoglobin is a measure of the carrying capacity of each boxcar, or red blood cell.
    Other mineral levels can be lowered by mercury's tendency to fight for site. A deficiency of any of these minerals can lead to fatigue and other symptoms:
    Cobalt, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium are all required for energy.

    • Zinc is needed for the manufacture of adrenaline
    • A deficiency of zinc, copper, or potassium can lower adrenal activity
    • Cobalt, usually obtained from vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) prevents pernicious anemia, a cause of fatigue
    • Mercury blocks magnesium and manganese transport required for memory, resulting in lowered ability to concentrate
    These mineral deficiencies may be primarily due to dietary deficiencies. However, deficiencies may also be secondary. The mineral may be in the body but cannot get to where it is needed because mercury has blocked the way. This is like putting a too-large battery in a toy - it won't fit in the slot made for a smaller battery, both denying power to the toy and blocking the slot from receiving the correct size battery.
    Fatigue associated with mercury toxicity can be due to several of mercury's effects, including reducing adrenaline and neurotransmitter effects, reducing oxygen to tissues, and interfering with coenzyme A, which converts sugar to energy.
    How can mercury increase the toxicity of other poisons?
    Mercuric ion (Hg+2) binds to sulfhydryl groups (-SH) in proteins and disulfide groups (-SS) in amino acids. These sulfur containing groups have an important detoxification function in the body. Increased toxicity from chemicals and metals other than mercury can result from mercury binding these sulfur groups and preventing them from detoxifying the chemicals.
    Mercury binding the bile lowers the ability of the body to absorb fat, leading to increased absorption of toxic oil-soluble chemicals such as solvents and pesticides like a dry sponge.
    Selenium is an antioxidant which binds in place of oxygen and which protects against free radical damage from chemicals which can lead to cancer. Mercury can bind to selenium, making it useless for this protective purpose.
    What else can mercury do?
    Mercurous ion (Hg+1) pushes out Na+1 (sodium), K+1 (potassium), and Li+1 (lithium). Sodium and potassium are part of the cellular sodium/potassium pump which causes muscle movement. Interference with sodium and potassium can lead to muscle weakness for this reason. Leg and muscle cramps may be due to potassium deficiency.
    Lithium is sometimes given as lithium carbonate to patients suffering from bipolar depression (manic depressive illness) since lack of lithium is one of the causes of the disease. Lack of lithium may itself be caused by mercury preventing lithium from working as it should in the brain.

    Mercury is like the 200 pound bully attacking a 7 pound baby; the small baby doesn't have much of a chance. 200 and 7 are the molecular weights of mercury (the bully) and lithium (the baby) respectively. If you have been diagnosed with bipolar depression, maybe what you need is less mercury, not more lithium pills.
    Mercury fights for binding sites in the kidney, another organ for which it has a special affinity. A mineral and electrolyte balance is needed in order for the kidney to perform its functions, and a poorly functioning kidney can lead to edema (fluid buildup in the body). These minerals are prevented from entering into their reactions when mercury is there to interfere.

    Suppression of potassium by mercury also affects the kidneys which takes you from making adrenaline to maintaining electrolyte balance, and the lowered adrenaline level can lead to lower energy.
    Detoxification systems such as metallothionein, cytochrome P-450, and bile are adversely affected by mercury. Metallothionein binds toxic metals in the body to prepare them for excretion. Mercury ties up this material so it cannot clear out other metals such as lead, cadmium, and aluminum.
    Mercury from amalgam binds to -SH (sulfhydryl) groups, which are used in almost every enzymatic process in the body. Mercury therefore has the potential to disturb all metabolic processes.
    Some people appear to be allergic to whatever food they eat. No matter what they eat, at least one thing in common is ingested - mercury (or nickel). Mercury released from amalgam during chewing may be the cause of most of the symptoms which seem to be caused by the food.

    If a mercury vapor test, described later in this chapter, is done, it may show a low to moderate level of mercury initially, but a sharply increased level after chewing gum. This is also what happens when food is chewed. Such a test result combined with apparent allergy to most food points to mercury as a probable culprit. Nickel, which may also be contributing to the problem, is in stainless steel posts and braces.
    ________________________________________


    ________________________________________
    Tests that help to diagnose metal and chemical toxicity include blood tests, urine tests, and the analysis of hair, nails or other tissues. The most accurate of these are a chelation challenge test or a hair analysis.
    Regular blood tests and urine tests are not accurate in diagnosing heavy metal toxicity, as they only tend to show what is happening in the body at that brief moment in time, and do not give the long-term picture.

    This makes sense since the body works hard to keep the levels of nutrients in the bloodstream within fairly tight limits. If large fluctuations in mineral levels occurred, serious illness or even death would result.
    A chelation challenge test needs to be performed by a doctor who specializes in chelation therapy. The patient is given a chelating drug, commonly DMPS or DMSA, and the patient's urine is collected and analyzed over a 24 hour period. This test is a highly accurate way of knowing just what heavy metals are present in the body.
    The drawbacks to this method are that it requires a visit to a health care professional's office, it is expensive, and there is a possibility of side effects to the chelating drugs.
    A hair mineral analysis is an excellent alternative way of determining what toxic metals are present in the body. In addition, it also measures the levels of essential minerals in the body, such as calcium, magnesium and zinc, and toxic metal and mineral ratios. This test can provide you with much-needed information about mineral deficiencies and imbalances in your body, especially if you're suffering from symptoms of heavy metal poisoning.

    Hair Tissue Mineral Analyses (HTMA)
    A tissue mineral analysis or hair analysis provides a unique reading of heavy metal and mineral levels in the cells over a two to three month period. It takes into consideration that toxins are stored in the tissues of the body, not in the blood. For instance, you can have normal copper levels in the blood, but high copper levels in the tissues.
    The reason hair is used for testing mineral status and metabolic activity is because of it very nature. Our hair is formed from clusters of specialized cells that make up the hair follicle. During the growth phase, the hair is exposed to the interal environment such as blood, lymph and extra-cellular fluids. As the hair continues to grow and reaches the surface of the skin, its outer layers harden, locking in the metabolic products accumulated during the period of formation. This biological processs provides a blueprint and lasting record of metal content and nutritional metabolic activity that has occured during this time.
    The precise analytical method of determining the levels of minerals in the hair is a highly sophisticated technique: when performed to exacting standards and interpreted correctly, it may be used as a screening aid for determining mineral deficiencies, excesses, and/or imbalances. HTMA provides you and your healthcare professional with an economical and sensitive indicator of the long-term effects of diet, stress, toxic metal exposure and their effects on your mineral balance that is difficult to obtain through other clinical tests.
    It is important for the attending healthcare professional to determine your mineral status as minerals are absolutely critical for life and abundant health. They are involved in and are necessary for cellular metabolism, structural support, nerve conduction, muscular activity, immune functions, anti-oxidant and endocrine activity, enzyme functions, water and acid/alkaline balance and even DNA function.
    Many factors can affect mineral nutrition, such as: food preparation, dietary habits, genetic and metabolic disorders, disease, medications, stress, environmental factors, as well as exposure to heavy metals. Rarely does a single nutrient deficiency exist in a person today. Multiple nutritional imbalances however are quite common, contributing to an increased incidence of adverse health conditions. In fact, it is estimated that mild and sub-clinical nutritional imbalances are up to ten times more common than nutritional deficiency alone.

    To get an idea of how helpful a hair tissue analysis can be, think about this: Researchers using tissue mineral analysis determined, more than 100 years after Napoloen Bonaparte's death, that he had been poisoned by arsenic. Even though his hair sample was tested more than a century after his death, it still revealed pathological amounts of arsenic that had gradually proved fatal.
    CONCLUSION:

    1.There is good evidence that larger animals and therefore Humans suffer interference to gut mineral absorbtion due to high levels of glyphosate in certain staple foods.
    2. Mercury does ‘site grabbing’ where it occupies a location in your molecules that is designed for a beneficial mineral.
    3. MY INFERENCE is that increased deficiency in those beneficial minerals due to Glyphosate ASSISTS mercury to play havoc with our bodies.

    If this is true, and I had an autistic kid I would try the following:

    1. Remove all glyphosate contaminated foods from the diet
    2. Supplement minerals (this, in itself is no simple matter)
    3. Look into how to remove mercury – there are natural helpers such as cilantro...
    Last edited by Baby Steps; 25th January 2017 at 23:23.
    we have subcontracted the business of healing people to Companies who profit from sickness.

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to Baby Steps For This Post:

    onawah (23rd January 2017)

  39. Link to Post #160
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,360
    Thanks
    14,766
    Thanked 19,875 times in 3,137 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    There are clinics now that can successfully reverse mercury poisoning of the brain, the leading cause of autism, using a type of supplement taken orally.

    Excellent report. thanks

  40. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    Baby Steps (23rd January 2017), onawah (23rd January 2017)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 24 FirstFirst 1 8 18 24 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts