Alert: Sheriffs Move To Arrest Convicted Vatican Church Leaders Bergoglio, Pachon, Welby:

[sigma6]

Sheriffs move to arrest convicted church leaders Bergoglio, Pachon and Welby: Vatican-Crown plan counter attack

WE ARE LIVING IN THE AGE OF REVELATION AND PROPHECY!
COULD THIS BE THE LAST POPE!?

"There are rumors that a price has been put on Annett's head by Ndrangheta"
An Update from The International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels
July 24, 2014 , 3 pm GMT (Common Cause News Service and copyright)
Brussels, Rome and London:

In the wake of the Court's criminal conviction of Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, Jesuit head Adolfo Pachon and Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby on July 18, Court-authorized Sheriffs armed with Arrest Warrants are seeking to detain the three convicted men today in London and Rome.

Bergoglio, Pachon and Welby were found guilty of child trafficking and murder by a unanimous decision of the five Magistrates of the Court last Friday, and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole.

A spokeswoman for the Court said today,
"Our Sheriffs have notified police authorities in England, Italy and at the Vatican about the conviction, and have asked for their assistance in arresting the guilty parties, who have been issued a Court Order to comply with the verdict, and to surrender themselves to the Sheriffs"

In response, sources in Rome and Brussels have informed the Court that the Vatican is launching a counter attack against the verdict which will include blind media stories attacking the Court and Kevin Annett.

"You can expect an escalation in the hysteria and smears against him and the Court, including from the so-called alternative media that gets Vatican money. Now's the time for another big distraction to fog your verdict" stated a member of Italy's Radical Party today.

Politicians and church sources in Rome confirm that the Court verdict has the Pope "extremely worried". Jesuit leader Adolfo Pachon, also convicted by the Court, has already announced that he will resign at the next Jesuit congress.

In London, Archbishop Welby closeted himself with advisers on July 14 to discuss the Court's case, during the recent London Synod of the Anglican church. Welby has apparently decided not to leave Lambeth Palace, his official residence in London, and has requested police protection.


But the criminal syndicate known as Ndrangheta, which was publicly exposed by Kevin Annett and the Court as a major actor in child trafficking and murder connected to the Catholic church, is apparently planning a more deadly response.

According to a source in a Belgian police department,
"There are rumors that a price has been put on Annett's head by Ndrangheta. My contacts say it's being planned with the Holy Alliance" (the Vatican spy and assassination agency).

The Court is planning to release some of the key evidence that convicted the three church officials no later than September 1, 2014, when a Permanent Commission into Child Trafficking and Ritual Sacrifice will be established to dig deeper into the role of Ndrangheta and major banks in drug money laundering, child trafficking and murder.

A European representative of the Common Law Court, Melanie Vritschan, and Field Secretary Kevin Annett will be holding a global media interview soon to elaborate the evidence and respond to these new threats. Stand by for further updates and instructions.

Issued by The Public Information Office of The International Common Law Court of Justice, Brussels

24 July, 2014, 3 pm GMT
www.iclcj.com , www.itccs.org

[Curt]

It's worth noting that the 'sheriffs' in question have no legal authority to detain anyone.

And the 'warrants' were issued by the 'International Common Law Court', which has no legal authority and no enforcement authority.

It would be like if Project Avalon set up a court and then appointed sheriffs and issued warrants for people's arrests.

We should be under no illusions that this 'court' has any teeth whatsoever.

Do I say this because I'm happy about it?

NO.

It would be great if there were justice in the world.

But let's not kid ourselves here, folks.

[Snoweagle]

Posted by Curt (here)
It's worth noting that the 'sheriffs' in question have no legal authority to detain anyone.
And the 'warrants' were issued by the 'International Common Law Court', which has no legal authority and no enforcement authority.

It is that mindset that keeps everyone stupid.

What authority do you allude to?
Do you refer to the forceful entrapment by Financial Oligarchs with a Court system that is despised the world over?
Legal authority? What is it? Who controls the Legal Authority you allude to?
Enforcement Authority? This is the person with bullets still in the chamber of the gun pointing at our heads, these are the ones that have forced the "Legal Authority" upon us.

It is the core perception we have no say and we move from day to day blind to the vagaries of our existence.

The International Common Law Court has the authority that we provide it with and not from it's own claims.

If you believe what they are doing is good, then stand up and say so. That is power. Bring your friends and family into the discussion, as only by doing that will we be able to break this slavery mentality that persists in our lives.

[Brakeman]

What silliness.

Does anyone here believe the world of men to work that way?

Self appointed courts based on a whimsical interpretation of more interpretations.

The world of men continues regardless if the kids are playing dress up in the playhouse across the street.

[Snoweagle]

Posted by Brakeman (here)
What silliness.
Does anyone here believe the world of men to work that way?
Self appointed courts based on a whimsical interpretation of more interpretations.

You are clearly referring to the Jewish Freemasonic Global Legal System now entrenched within the United Nations. Self appointed. Not elected.

Time for change.

The International Common Law Court has my support.

[folotheflo]

mark my words, they will not be arrested, but god damn i wish they were. The world of men is indeed horrificly inadequate

[Snoweagle]

Posted by folotheflo (here)
mark my words, they will not be arrested, but god damn i wish they were. The world of men is indeed horrificly inadequate

We grant you your wish, just stand up and be counted, shout it out, sing a song but do not let your desire waiver.
When you believe in something and you really want something, what do people say?
Would it be something like:
"Get off your phuking arse and do something about it"
"Move yourself"
"Now is the time"
and one from Gene Rosenberry "ENGAGE"

Just do not whimper in dark places - Suck it up and go for it

[sigma6]

Posted by Curt (here)
It's worth noting that the 'sheriffs' in question have no legal authority to detain anyone.
And the 'warrants' were issued by the 'International Common Law Court', which has no legal authority and no enforcement authority.
It would be like if Project Avalon set up a court and then appointed sheriffs and issued warrants for people's arrests.
We should be under no illusions that this 'court' has any teeth whatsoever.

Do I say this because I'm happy about it?

NO.

It would be great if there were justice in the world.

But let's not kid ourselves here, folks.

That's only half true, the fact is all the "government officials that you think have authority don't either within the context that you are defining...
But that doesn't stop millions of people from lining up and ending up in jail...
Doesn't stop the killings...

Fact of the matter is WE ARE LIVING UNDER AN ILLUSION, including yourself...

ie. what you are saying is meaningless because you have left out the context to make it meaningful...

In this mind boggling Talkshoe, EX ATTORNEY "Debra" drops bombshell after bombshell, exactly what I have been saying...
We are considered idiots in their eyes... Cattle to be milked and slaughtered for their enrichment....
I should put this in Driver's License Thread (about exposing the illusion and fraud of corporations pretending to be our governments)

They are corporations using every deception in order to mislead us into thinking we have to kiss their arses,
of course you know what happens when you try to explain this stuff to the ignorant masses...

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...77230&cmd=apop

Rod Class' Page
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=48361&cmd=tc


Looking at some of the comments, no wonder so many are weak and powerless, you have resigned yourself to your own birdcage. It's called Learned Helplessness. And it's a psychological condition. Kevin Annett has moved mountains, it's a shame that a world full of 7 billion people would emasculate themselves, of their own consent...

[sigma6]

Posted by Brakeman (here)
What silliness.

Does anyone here believe the world of men to work that way?

Self appointed courts based on a whimsical interpretation of more interpretations.

The world of men continues regardless if the kids are playing dress up in the playhouse across the street.

We can believe what you are saying or take the word of an ex attorney who has been taught the system from the inside...
I love how people always equate their own failures and the failures of others as proof of concept.

Tell that to Thomas Edison. Although I never agreed with his morality as a human being. He understood persistence... trial and error and hard work.
That's how you get results in the real world. Whereas the rest of the planet thinks that if you don't solve the worlds problems in 2 hours (Hollywood Movie time) there is no solution... (if you get what I mean...)

Anyhow according to Debra... the most powerful court is the Grand Jury... ie. 12 people who picked themselves to be the court. In fact she explains what the real court is... (it's YOU!!!) Again the only problem is the ignorance and stupidity of the people...
(as harsh as that sounds... it's wakey wakey time... AGAIN)

This is what Sam Kennedy was attempting and it looks like Tim Turner might have either been just a greedy self serving upstart, or an inside agent...
But Sam Kennedy was trying to establish Grand Juries back in 2008/9?
He had it right, and the BIGGEST OBSTACLE turned out to be the internal members of his own group! This self sabotaging behaviour is UNIVERSAL ingrained from generations. THAT IS THEIR REAL POWER, AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN.

Ex Attorney Spills the Beans... Guess what you have been duped by Occult Manipulators...
Warning: This is a bit of a mindblower, but people who still "don't get it" should at least make room for the people who are interested in learning. This information is now leaking out from so many sources it's getting retarded. The only problem is that there IS A LOT of LEARNING and UNLEARNING (misconceptions, illusions, misinterpretations, etc) that has to be done. But what are we here for?
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...77230&cmd=apop

Rod's Page
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=48361&cmd=tc


If you want it bad enough, you have to pursue it wholeheartedly... with seriousness of mind, focus, and due diligence, and you are going to need a network...

[Operator]

I am skeptical too ... but a sideways-in raid always works the best

So, if people believe that black covert ops are 'legal' well then we will stay in
this status quo forever ...

It also makes sense why they are now attacking forums that speak about - or
encourage matters that are not 'legal' (i.e. (man-)made up by them).

[sigma6]

Right, it's all a play on words, legal essentially means corporate, ficitional, statutory, codes (CODES!!!) regulations, CORPORATE RULES
Corporate Rules that only apply to anyone willing to be an employee of a corporation...

If you escape that one then there is lawful. LAW and LAWFULNESS
This is, in a sense just another trap, as many folks try to run to COMMON LAW...

1 Timothy 1:5-10 explains who the LAW applies to...

King James Version (KJV) (Authorized to be used in a court of LAW)
5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;

Then there is TRUST... and lo and behold... She does actually touch on this... Now considering it doesn't sound like she has studied trust law per se... Her direct education and experience shows she knows how to WORK within the system to evoke it... and that is what counts...

And sure enough She also states the highest court is the Court of Chancery. There is one in every State, but it is hidden (of course...) That is where the Constitution is upheld.

[Curt]

Hi Sig,

I appreciate your frustration. And I get it.

Here's my point, though.

Annett's court presents itself as though it has the power to issue warrants and detain and arrest people.

It doesn't.

And here's the thing: Annett's court potentially has something far more powerful than that: moral authority.

If wielded properly, his organisation could channel the righteous indignation of 7 billion people worldwide- people who find themselves enslaved by the legal fictions you've so well described.

But so long as his 'court' clings to pretensions of 'legal' authority, which it doesn't have, it undermines its own credibility.

It becomes a sideshow that people can ignore.

And who does that benefit?

Not any of us.

Posted by sigma6 (here)

Posted by Curt (here)
It's worth noting that the 'sheriffs' in question have no legal authority to detain anyone.
And the 'warrants' were issued by the 'International Common Law Court', which has no legal authority and no enforcement authority.
It would be like if Project Avalon set up a court and then appointed sheriffs and issued warrants for people's arrests.
We should be under no illusions that this 'court' has any teeth whatsoever.

Do I say this because I'm happy about it?

NO.

It would be great if there were justice in the world.

But let's not kid ourselves here, folks.

That's only half true, the fact is all the "government officials that you think have authority don't either within the context that you are defining...
But that doesn't stop millions of people from lining up and ending up in jail...
Doesn't stop the killings...

Fact of the matter is WE ARE LIVING UNDER AN ILLUSION, including yourself...

ie. what you are saying is meaningless because you have left out the context to make it meaningful...

In this mind boggling Talkshoe, EX ATTORNEY "Debra" drops bombshell after bombshell, exactly what I have been saying...
We are considered idiots in their eyes... Cattle to be milked and slaughtered for their enrichment....
I should put this in Driver's License Thread (about exposing the illusion and fraud of corporations pretending to be our governments)

They are corporations using every deception in order to mislead us into thinking we have to kiss their arses,
of course you know what happens when you try to explain this stuff to the ignorant masses...

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...77230&cmd=apop

Rod Class' Page
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=48361&cmd=tc


Looking at some of the comments, no wonder so many are weak and powerless, you have resigned yourself to your own birdcage. It's called Learned Helplessness. And it's a psychological condition. Kevin Annett has moved mountains, it's a shame that a world full of 7 billion people would emasculate themselves, of their own consent...

[sigma6]

Lol no frustration, I am quite resigned to the pragmatic realities...
but I'd suggest listening to the Talkshoe audio... Kevin Annet does have authority... People who can't see trust interpretation are missing what is going on... and moral authority might be one way of describing it, but the way you are phrasing it, it's a "popularity" contest, and I get that, but it's is quite more than that... Ironically the way the "fake" authorities that you think have "real" authority get it, is precisely by keeping people misinformed, just like what you are doing. (you are not alone, you have company in the millions and millions...) And that is the basis of their "fake" authority, your assumption that theirs is "real" and your inability to realize what Kevin is actually doing.

In all sincerity, you should check out the audio first. I just came across it, and posted it because it is mind blowing in its implications. It is not based on theory but inside information, from an actual Attorney. I don't think what you are still being vague about can't hold a candle to that. Although millions share your assumptions. What she speaks of has a basis in principles that are universal and foundational. (ie. not going away) And the people are waking up are now going from hundreds and hundreds to thousands and thousands.

It's starts out a little rough, she is a very gritty, street smart New Yorker, but by the 2nd hour, it starts getting into the hard realities. So I am saying that everything you think you know is baseless, misinterpreted, you have been fooled into believing it is true. This has been done very systematically and on purpose. But there is also a way out. What people "accept as normal today" would have been considered psychologically dysfunctional even 15, 20 years ago.

I was watching that Al Jazeera video being advertised, about how the FBI hires informants and arrests suspected terrorists... what struck me is how all these people in the US who are making money off this, mentally sound like a bunch of teenage punks lying through their teeth, that lack even basic high school education, was palpable. There is something terrible happening in the US... it's shocking...

What you think is an authority IS LITERALLY a for profit corporation listed on Dunn and Brad Street "posing" as a lawful authority. And you have got to learn how to tell them that you don't want to do business with them (sexual intercourse, according to THEIR LEGAL DICTIONARY) In the audio she hints at the occult aspect but decides to leave it out... this isn't metaphorical, it is the ACTUAL model. A game if you will, the rules by which they operate. And it is ALL based on DECEPTION and can ONLY operate so long as you remain ignorant to it.

Also what you are saying is naive in light of the very real context of Ratzy stepping down, an "unprecedented" event that hasn't happened in 600 YEARS, and Adolfo Pachon has already publicly suggested he is resigning... !! (don't tell me this is a coincidence...)

People, the time has arrived (the age of revelation, increase in information, zero point, apocalypse, "the 7 bad years", etc) Interestingly Debra, also mentioned something that has been floating around in the Commercial Redemption movement, and that is there will be changes preventing people from "getting out of the system"... a "lock down" in effect, maybe another couple years... technically I don't think it will ever be impossible, but it is clearly the "game" is getting more convoluted.

Want to change the world, want to take the silver spoon away from them, learn to exercise your rights. You can't pay someone else to do it... (notwithstanding you are excessively wealthy... but that is not the game we want to play)

[MargueriteBee]

I didn't know what a chancery court was:

http://thelawdictionary.org/court-of-chancery/

A court having the jurisdiction of a chancellor; a court administering equity and proceeding according to the forms and principles of equity. In England, prior to the judicature acts, the style of the court possessing the largest equitable powers and jurisdiction was the “high court of chancery.” In some of the United States, the title “court of chancery” is applied to a court possessing general equity powers, distinct from the courts of common law. Parmeter v. Bourne, 8 Wash. 45, 35 Pac. 5SO. The terms “equity” and “chancery,” “court of equity” and “court of chancery,” are constantly used as synonymous in the United States. It is presumed that this custom arises from the circumstance that the equity jurisdiction which is exercised by the courts of the various states is assimilated to that possessed by the English courts of chancery. Indeed, in some of the states it is made identical there with by statute, so far as conformable to our institutions. Bouvier.

Law Dictionary: What is COURT OF CHANCERY? definition of COURT OF CHANCERY (Black's Law Dictionary)

[linksplatinum]

The context of what this topic is referring to (hence the authority), is about the detachment of the system towards human sovereignty, and the corporate illusion of their laws which have no bearing on the individual, unless you allow for it to perpetuate in your ignorance. This is what sigma6 and I were talking about when we were discussing the teachings of "Kate of Gaia" and other's who have broken the fraud of the so-called "power".

This should keep one busy for a while... STUDY HARD, WORK SMARTER, NOT HARDER... It's all up to YOU
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...man-conspiracy
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...aia#post851660
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...f-of-the-CROWN
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...aia#post810642



Mayan shaman mantra:

I empower in order to question authority
Commanding fearlessness
I seal the output of intelligence, with the overtone of radiance
I am guided by the power of flowering
I am a galactic activation portal
Enter through me...

[sheme]

With out information- facts and proof/evidence I can't condone any "peoples common law judgement and sentence" and I could not be party to any lynch mob.

That's how Hitler got away with the extermination of a nation -they were judged by his prejudice.

[Brakeman]

Don't hold your breath!

[sigma6]

Posted by sheme (here)
With out information- facts and proof/evidence I can't condone any "peoples common law judgement and sentence" and I could not be party to any lynch mob.

That's how Hitler got away with the extermination of a nation -they were judged by his prejudice.

Kevin Annet is wrong because Hitler killed a bunch of people? Never considered that argument. Even if we knew the REAL truth of WWII...

But that does highlight the problem. There is so much false information that people take for granted. And so much fundamental information that is hidden. People don't even understand basic logic, scientific thought process or philosophy any more. They're just "big" words today.

It's kind of like arguing whether truth is a universal fundamental value or not. Makes for a great philosophical exercise of mind. Some will point to liars who seem to have wealth and power and call that proof that truth is relative and secondary, and even a made up concept, etc. But deeper thinkers will know this is shallow and superficial thinking. The fact that millions lack philosophical fundamentals doesn't add any more weight to it (just more chaos) In fact a lot of what is happening in the world today is quite literally because there are so many people struggling to maintain the world in this state of denial.

The very fact that there are people that would even ask the question, is to me a sign of how far we have fallen.

[TargeT]

Posted by sigma6 (here)
It's starts out a little rough, she is a very gritty street, smart New Yorker, but by the 2nd hour, it starts getting into the hard realities. So I am saying that everything you think you know is baseless, misinterpreted, you have been fooled into believing it is true. This has been done very systematically and on purpose. But there is also a way out. What people "accept as normal today" would have been considered psychologically dysfunctional even 15, 20 years ago.

It seems that what is needed here is a comprehensive enough, yet simplistic enough info graphic, or dissertation or brief video primer... something to cover the "1 mile wide, 1 inch deep" in an entertaining / engaging way that is also very believable.

a PR offering, our own agenda focused propaganda as it were.

maybe a movie on the topic, or short quasi fictional series of episodic "dramatizations" that will entertain and educate on the topic (we have seen a few attempts on this, but more are needed).

The faster and wider the dissemination the better.

Posted by sheme (here)
With out information- facts and proof/evidence I can't condone any "peoples common law judgement and sentence" and I could not be party to any lynch mob.

That's how Hitler got away with the extermination of a nation -they were judged by his prejudice.

I'm not prepared to completely commit to hitler being anywhere close to what modern history teaches... Yes Hitler had a VERY anti "jew" mentality; but if you look at WW1 and the going-ons in Germany you'll find that the jewish banking and money handling institutions were being ousted, exactly as they should be today....

and of course we can get into the holocaust questions... the extreme lack of dead bodies, the missing markers for chemical agents being used...

Hitler, Nazi's and the Holocaust are the armor of the modern banking family cartels... they have made it illegal in most the modern world to even criticize them (anti-Semitic is the rally cry there) and based on very shaky historical situations when you sit down and do some leg work.

There for I reject any use of hitler's actions as a warning against what we should do now... unless you feel you have done the topic due diligence and can say other wise.

I would not be surprised if "hitlers prejudice" mirrors my own trepidations and concerns about the jewish families that seem pervasive in the tyrannical and oppressive banking oligarchs that are strangling the world today.... with a few twists and lies anyone can be made to be hitler... especially if you control all media outlets and governments.


Basically this: question everything, always... ESPECIALLY what you think you "KNOW" like "hitler" and what happened during that period.

any information you reference that you haven't personally researched is now suspect... we have learned too much to not question that type of "knowledge".

[sigma6]

Posted by TargeT (here)

Posted by sigma6 (here)
It's starts out a little rough, she is a very gritty street, smart New Yorker, but by the 2nd hour, it starts getting into the hard realities. So I am saying that everything you think you know is baseless, misinterpreted, you have been fooled into believing it is true. This has been done very systematically and on purpose. But there is also a way out. What people "accept as normal today" would have been considered psychologically dysfunctional even 15, 20 years ago.

It seems that what is needed here is a comprehensive enough, yet simplistic enough info graphic, or dissertation or brief video primer... something to cover the "1 mile wide, 1 inch deep" in an entertaining / engaging way that is also very believable.

a PR offering, our own agenda focused propaganda as it were.

maybe a movie on the topic, or short quasi fictional series of episodic "dramatizations" that will entertain and educate on the topic (we have seen a few attempts on this, but more are needed).

The faster and wider the dissemination the better.

I thought you were going to criticize it Target (and I was going to have to straighten you out!... LOL...)

But that IS a good question... and it is true. Sometimes it feels like I am only teasing others with information. And for that, I can only suggest people go to my "What the Government isn't telling you" thread (Conspiracy) and find the post with my "hidden" link.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post832198
That is the latest link that connects all the "trust interpretation topics that I can still remember. In those posts, I give specific definitions, explain fundamental concepts, Give examples of real experiences and real court cases which clearly demonstrate this "hidden" aspect. I linked about a dozen plus.

The fact is, I and others like Grip and many others have been on this path for many years. I will admit I have been at it going on 7 years coming up, and I will admit, I had a huge success (prematurely and by "luck" or "intuition") then plateaued for several years and it has only started making sense to me in the last couple of years... So there is only so much I can articulate and post. Today the focus is on translating understanding into specific applications and learning as much about trust in general which will go on for many years I have no doubt. (the final frontier)

Entertaining videos is totally beyond my scope, but if I had the resources I would love to do that!... in the mean time I can only share what little I know and understand. The reason it takes so long is myriad. It encompasses hidden history, religion, law, secret societies. The occult references I make are literal not metaphorical. (Think Vatican) Metaphorically it IS the MATRIX. Also because this knowledge is, for all practical intents and purposes "secret". Secret in terms of its subtly and secret because it is not taught in public schools or institutions.

Secret Societies like to keep this information from us. (knowledge is power) Lawyers make an oath to NEVER give out certain information, even to their wives. The Temple Bar and Law Societies operate like Secret Societies. The information had to be "deduced" from interpreting thousands of court cases, (many sacrificed their material livelihood, lost cars, homes, thousands of dollars, experienced jail time, etc. I'm talking REAL sacrifices. Anyone serious especially in the earlier periods will have experienced some attack or loss. Mostly from their own mistakes, experimenting IS risky. And partly because when they realize what you are up to (ITS ALL ABOUT CONTROL...) they freak out! There are many observations and stories of Judges and prosecutors going white with fear (you are getting too close!) I especially focus on collecting and studying "anomalous" court cases. As they reveal the most insight in my opinion and expose the hidden aspect. (Which I include many in my examples. Also, many "Gurus" either didn't share the most important aspects or didn't know themselves.

Jordan Maxwell and Roger Elvick were some of the earliest names. Winston Shrout put a Name and Face on the movement in early 2000 and has profited handsomely I would imagine. Christian Walters came on the scene in January 2009. And I believe that was a major turning point. I clearly remember there were two major topics that were missing (or I didn't understand) And that was the concept of private and public and trust. Or what I call trust interpretation.

I remember hitting all the gurus I was in contact with when I started listening to CW... He was the first person, apart from Winston, that appeared to have a truly fundamental interpretation (what I was looking for) At the time I was studying "qualifying" signatures ie. meaning of by: for: per: "without prejudice" "vi coactus" "all rights reserved" "non assumpsit" etc. CW proposed the first model showing the relationship between the 3 major definitions of trust (ie. expressed, resulting and constructive, Winston's A4V, and the signatures... I was hooked, and saw right away this was the missing link.

I never doubted it, and even "pushed" it on several 'Gurus' I was corresponding with at the time) I could see it... but everyone one else was vehemently opposed. Today, the more I learn the more it has held true. Today Winston has produced DVDs on Trust, and pretty much everyone who is pushing the envelope is now "trying" to factor it into their interpretation in one way or another, even if they don't realize it...

It is the only way to make sense of what is going on. I mention all this because, although many have been at it for over 20 years, 15 years, 10 years, (it's like learning a second language.) But today now that we KNOW what we are looking for. If you apply the right strategy, you can speed up the whole process of learning within a few years. This is really happening in real time. There is NO escaping trust interpretation. It is the LAW that everything else revolves around. The bedrock. The key. The basis of philosophy, contract, law, admiralty, commerce, etc.

If anyone wants more information they can contact me privately. I can only share what I have... but I would suggest they look at my "secret link" go through all the posts. If you like what you are reading, make a list of questions... and contact me privately. I enjoyed posting on Avalon, as it really developed a lot of ideas, by posting it "quasi publicly" forced me to discipline my thinking and organize some ideas. i.e. comprehension and expression are two separate brain functions! And finally I do have some things I don't think I would post here... because it would attract more confusion then help people...