Posted by Paul
(here)
From 2001 until about 2008, I bought into the official story on 9/11.
For the last several years, I've trusted Judy Wood's research above all others.
My current (and fairly recent) view is that while Judy Wood's research on the destruction of the WTC towers remains far and away the best, however Gordon Duff (who self admittedly tells untruths fairly often) is likely also substantially correct in stating that he has received reports from the Russians of the use of small nuclear bombs provided by Israel, and that these reports from the Russians are themselves substantially correct.
The key to my apparently inconsistent view is that nuclear bombs, directed energy weapons and "scalar physics" have more overlap than we usually realize. Nukes can cause strange effects, such as those observed by Hutchinson (using very different means, on a much smaller scale) and nukes apparently can be engineered to have a limited and fairly well defined range and nature of effect.
My present view is that the "directed energy" weapons responsible for the dustification of the towers consisted substantially or primarily of highly engineered nuclear bombs, emitting an intense neutron flux from various positions in the core of the towers sufficient to disassociate (dustify) the molecular bonds of most of the materials in the towers, including human bodies, concrete and steel, but not so much paper.
Whether these same bombs caused some of the more remote effects, such as toasted cars, or whether some other scalar physics mechanism caused those ... I am presently quite undecided. Certainly other means were involved as well, as evidenced by the strange behaviour of hurricane Erin.
There were enough explosions, fireballs and other strange effects, from the time of initial (apparent) airplane impact until the final dustification, and following in the WTC complex and its victims for years following, that
it is a near certainty that multiple mechanisms were used.
Certainly, in any case, an immense amount of energy was required, in a very short period of time (10 seconds to dustify each tower) to disassociate that many molecular bonds. As anyone who has ever imagined trying to turn even one cinder block into talcum powder fine dust using a sledge hammer will likely realize, that's "hard work" ... a lot of hard work.
Also, certainly, Judy Wood has been getting more flak than more or less any 9/11 researcher out there. This however does not necessarily mean that she is
exactly "over the target", as the bastards in power know well the propensity of those of us trying to think and research outside of their boxes to associate "getting flak" with "being over the target." The mechanical engineering, determined and disciplined research, integrity, and analysis skills of Judy are all unmatched in this arena. She does not however, so far as I am aware, claim to be a world class expert on nuclear weapons, directed energy or their underlying scalar physics.
Thank-you Andrew, and especially thank-you Judy, for all you've done and continue to do to investigate this central aspect of 9/11.
Don't mention Dr. Judy Wood
Reply With Quote
. We all get stuff wrong, in the light of our own hindsight or others insight ... and most of us (at least myself) do so rather frequently.
Bookmarks