New 911 Scientific Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Chemical Engineer Mark Basile

[ponda]

eyes wide open,

i believe that there are many unknowns and unexplained aspects to the whole 911 event.i also believe that Dr Wood's has uncovered some interesting perspectives of 911 that no one else has.i'm open to the way that she has presented her interpretations of the available evidence.To say that she "clearly has no idea what she is talking about" is a fairly big call in my opinion.If you want to believe that she has been "totally debunked" then that's fine.If you want tow the nist line then that's fine too.Everyone is entitled to their opinion.cheers

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

How many of the new NIST videos have you watched? Did you watch the interview of Judy Wood I posted?

[ponda]

Here is something of relevance in regards to our discussion.i don't know if you are aware of this or not.i uncovered some info that states that.... "Dr Judy Wood filed an official Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) citing fraud and deception in the 9/11 NIST Report."

Here are some more quotes from the article...

"Her RFC, along with its two Supplements, are archived on the official US Government Department of Commerce website. In her RFC Wood clearly explains how NIST misled the public with their report. She also shows evidence for directed energy weapon usage.

In Dr. Wood's first Supplement, she exposes the fact that NIST contracted with a major manufacturer of directed energy weapons for the 9/11 NIST Report.

The company in question, Applied Research Associates (ARA), is not only a manufacturer of directed energy weapons, but is also a founding sponsor of Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

DEPS, founded in 1999, put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11. An excerpt from this newsletter is as follows:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield — we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of weaponry."

http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf

More recently Dr. Wood and her attorney revealed that another company NIST contacted with for their Report, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), is also a manufacturer of directed energy weapons.

In Dr. Wood's second Supplement she explains that testimony given by Emergency Medical Technician Patricia Ondrovic during the WTC Task Force Interview is consistent with directed energy weapon evidence usage at the World Trade Center."


here's the link: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/...ed-energy.html

cheers

[PookztA]

Posted by EYES WIDE OPEN (here)
Please dont shoot the messenger but that page has not been updated for 3 years.

Since, then she has been totally debunked. I am afraid you are flogging a dead horse.

She clearly has no idea what she is talking about as this interview with her makes obvious:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...6240694803017#

EyesWideOpen,

I am not sure what you see in that interview, but here is my opinion of it.

I am very grateful to Dr. Greg Jenkins for conducting his ambush interview of Dr. Judy Wood, because he exposed his true intentions and shed more light on the overwhelming amount of effort being put forth to discredit Dr. Wood and convince people to not look at the overwhelming sum of evidence she has gathered. I find it very interesting that Dr. Jenkins, who works/worked for the Department of Energy, showed up with full lighting and camera crews at the very end of a conference Dr. Wood was attending but not speaking at, around 12am, and spontaneously confronted her and asked her to do an interview on the spot. Why didn't Dr. Jenkins contact Dr. Wood ahead of time to get advanced permission for the interview? Why didn't Dr. Jenkins attend the conference, but only showed up at the very end of it for the specific purpose of asking Dr. Wood to do this spontaneous interview? Why did Dr. Jenkins show up with full lighting and camera crews, yet he only brought one black and white photo of the thousands of full color photos, videos, documents, and graphs Dr. Wood has gathered, only to later insert the full-color copy of the image into the edited video recording of the interview?

Here is the transcript from the interview, which allows for a more detailed analysis of the dialogue: http://drjudywood.com/articles/trans...ranscript.html



Cheers,

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

http://youtube.com/pookzta
http://facebook.com/AbrahamHafizRodriguez

[PookztA]

I wanted to add one more thing about Greg Jenkins quickly:

I find it admirable that Dr. Wood was right all along about the fact that the majority of the WTC buildings were transformed to fine dust, especially considering that she has been trying to wake the public up to that fact for over 4 years now. Others are still catching up, as today it is a commonly known fact that the WTC buildings were primarily turned to dust on 9/11. I wonder if Dr. Jenkins has corrected his false claims that the buildings were not turned to dust, or if he still believes the nonsense he was trying to promote throughout the interview... As Dr. Wood often says, you first need to determine WHAT happened, before you determine HOW it happened. If you skip the first part and assume you know what happened, further discussion tends to be rather meaningless and unscientific. Dr. Wood identified that the buildings were transformed to dust, and for some strange reason, Dr. Jenkins really wanted to avoid discussing that topic.

Dr. Judy Wood held strong in her scientific position all these years, and thank goodness she has. Her observations were correct, right from the start. It was this fortitude of hers which has forced Richard Gage (and others) into finally acknowledging the fact that the majoritiy of the WTC buildings turned to dust in mid air. However, that puts Richard Gage and Dr. Steven Jones in a very difficult positon, because thermite does not turn buildings into powder in mid air, nor do explosives of any kind...

Again, here is the transcript from the interview, which allows for a more detailed analysis of the dialogue: http://drjudywood.com/articles/trans...ranscript.html

and here is a brief summary of the thousands of photos, videos, graphs, and documents Dr. Judy Wood has gathered, which explosives of any kind do NOT explain: http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc

Has the 9/11 "Truth" Movement Always Been Corrupt? http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publis...le_61147.shtml


Thank you for your time, consideration, and help.

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Hi Guys. Thanks for the replies. very interesting. much appreciated.
Here is another clip from the NIST database about explosives before the planes hit: https://youtube.com/watch?v=v6KIb...layer_embedded

Also here is a new thermite experiment that proves NIST wrong. https://youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iI...layer_embedded