+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: John Lash on Archons

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2012
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4,895
    Thanked 7,269 times in 1,781 posts

    Default John Lash on Archons

    For reference purposes, here are some quotes about Archons from John Lash's book Not In His Image and from some of his online writings.

    Quote Amazingly, whatever the significance of their content (and we have just barely begun to comprehend what that might be), the Nag Hammadi Codices (NHC) are rare original artifacts, the earliest surviving examples of bound books.
    A close reading of these arcane materials shows that Gnostics were deeply concerned with alien intrusion into human affairs. The entities they called Archons appear to be identical to the ET’s of modern Ufology. Both Grey and Reptilian types are explicitly described in the codices. I would estimate that up to one-fifth of the core material in the NHC concerns the Archons, their origin, methods and motives.
    http://www.whale.to/c/john_lash.html

    Quote Deception and counterfeiting are signatures of the Archons: "Their
    delight is in deception [apaton] . . . and their counterfeit [antimimon]
    spirit" (Apocryphon of John, II, l:21). The Greek apaton denotes willful
    intent to deceive, and antimimoa denotes the method of Archontic
    deception: literally, "countermimicry." This means to copy something
    but make the copy, the fake version, serve a purpose counter to the original
    thing or idea.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),113.

    Quote They are called Archons, from Greek archaia, "primal," "first," "from the beginning,"
    because the formation of their world, the planetary system subject to inorganic
    and mechanical laws, precedes the formation of the living earth.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),114.

    Quote In the Gnostic perspective the Archons are nor only mind parasites, delusional
    nodes in the human mind, considered as quasi-autonomous
    psychic entities, if you will-they are cosmic imposters, parasites who
    pose as gods. But they lack the primary divine factor of ennoia,"intentionality,"
    "creative will." They cannot originate anything, they can only
    imitate, and they must effectuate their copycat activity with subterfuge
    and stealth, lest its true nature be detected.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),115.

    Quote Archons do not respect
    their proper boundaries in the cosmic
    order. They do not belong to the terrestrial biosphere, but to the planetary
    system beyond the earth. But they are invasive and they encourage
    invasion.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),115.

    Quote The dispossession motif is closely
    associated with the deific pretension of the Archons: "And the Lord
    Archon said to the authorities who attend him, 'Come let us create a
    man according to the image of God and according to our likeness"'(II, I,
    15.5). Here again is a familiar factor of biblical narrative, told with a
    Gnostic twist. The Archons are themselves deluded in believing they
    can create humans in their likeness. They do not succeed-all the
    Gnostic materials are explicit on this point-but they insinuate into
    human minds the belief that they have succeeded.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),116.

    Quote Archons wrongly believe they can impress their mentality upon the
    human species. They want to make humanity like themselves, but they
    are constantly foiled by the superiority of the human species, "whose
    origin is in the imperishable realm, where the virginal power dwells,
    superior to the Archons of chaos and to their universe"
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),116.

    Quote But although
    we can outhink the Archons, we do not always optimize the inborn
    intelligence of our species, called nous by the Gnostics. When the faculty
    of discrimination is weak, we are prone to let pretense and fantasy override
    clear thinking. Failing to own and evolve the intelligence innate to our species, we risk being deviated by another kind of mind, an artificial intelligence through which we become unreal to ourselves.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),117.

    Quote They insinuate their influence through religious beliefs-also through
    scientific beliefs, when science assumes the role in society formerly held
    by religion, as it largely does today-because such beliefs have rhe most
    potent effect on our sense of humanity and human potential.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),117.

    Quote Sophia shames
    the Demiurge by declaring to him that the Anthropos, though yet
    unborn, surpasses the Archons in intelligence, for humanity is an emanation
    of the Pleroma, whereas the Archons arise outside the cosmic
    core, without an act of emanation. Witnessing this reprimand, and
    shocked by the arrogance of the Demiurge, the newborn star undergoes
    a conversion: it chooses to align with Sophia against the realm of
    Archontic forces, i.e., the inorganic planetary field.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),159-160.

    To be continued...
    Last edited by Roisin; 31st August 2014 at 21:13.

  2. The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Roisin For This Post:

    Cara (31st August 2014), Carmen (31st August 2014), Debra (31st August 2014), earthadvocate (31st August 2014), EC1000 (31st August 2014), Frederick Jackson (1st September 2014), Jake (31st August 2014), Jean-Marie (31st August 2014), Joao (31st August 2014), kirolak (1st September 2014), Limor Wolf (31st August 2014), Marianne (31st August 2014), Marin (31st August 2014), mpennery (31st August 2014), nancyb (1st September 2014), naste.de.lumina (31st August 2014), nicktobias7 (12th September 2014), OmeyocaN777 (31st August 2014), Raven (31st August 2014), Stephanie (31st August 2014), Sunny-side-up (31st August 2014), Unicorn (31st August 2014)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2012
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4,895
    Thanked 7,269 times in 1,781 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote In the Gnostic view, the Archon/Annunaki do attempt to interbreed with humanity, but fail. Other texts describe how Eve leaves her “phantom image” which the Archons defile, but they are unable to actually access her body, i.e., human genetic structure.
    http://www.whale.to/c/john_lash.html

    Quote Gnostic text, The First Apocalypse of James, presents a detailed
    account of alien abduction:
    The Master said: "James, behold, I shall reveal to you the path of
    your redemption. Whenever you are seized and you undergo
    death-pangs (mortal fear), a multitude of Archons may turn on
    you, thinking they can capture you. And in particular, three of
    them will seize you, those who pose as toll collectors. Not only
    do they demand toll, but they take away souls by theft."
    The Gnostic master instructs James to repel the Archons by recalling
    how they originated and whence he, James, himself originates: "You are
    to say to him, 'To the place when I came, the Source, there shall I return.'
    And if you respond in this manner, you will escape their attacks." …
    But the Archons arise outside the Pleroma due to the anomalous impact of Sophia's plunge into the chaos below.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),285-286.

    Quote the ET/Archon connection, it is startling to find a full and coherent account of
    alien intrusion in ancient documents dating from 400 C.E., a textual
    legacy of knowledge derived from far older origins. It is worth noting
    that the first great UFO wave of the twentieth century occurred in the
    summer and fall of 1947 when Jean Doresse was in Cairo examining the
    Nag Hammadi Codices, at the very moment the first Dead Sea Scrolls
    were found. The famous sighting by aviator Kenneth Arnold over
    Mount Rainier, and the alleged Roswell crash, happened in that same
    summer. This was also the year that the CIA was founded, with the dual
    intention (according to UFO conspiracy buffs) to co-opt alien technology
    and cut a deal with the aliens, allowing them to experiment covertly on
    human subjects. Three-letter acronyms-NHC, DSS, UFO, CIA seem
    to proliferate like larvae when the Archons come into the picture.
    In fact, a CIA agent named Miles Copeland was dispatched ro Damascus
    to examine and photograph some of the first scroll fragments to be
    unearthed.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),288.

    Quote About one-fifth of all Coptic Gnostic materials concern the origin,
    motive, and methods of the Archons, including precise instructions on
    how to detect and overcome their influence. This material is both lucid
    and original, yet it has not been factored into the current debate over
    ETs and UFOs. The current literature abounds with reports of ETs,
    cyborgs, reptilians, close encounters, and tales of the cross-breeding of
    human and nonhuman entities, going all the way back to the Sumerian
    cuneiform story of the Annunaki. Such weird, sensational matters are
    not usually associated with religion and theology, yet Gnostic teachings
    connect these phenomena in a careful and intimate manner. Religious
    historians and Gnostic scholars are disinclined to interpret the Archons
    in terms of the current ETIUFO debate, or even to interpret them at all,
    but common sense invites the connection. … In the matter of the ET/UFO enigma, the Gnostics were ahead of everyone today. Way ahead.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),188-189.


    Quote Gnostics explicitly warned that the Archons work through salvationist
    religion, not to destroy us, however, but to deviate us from our proper
    course of evolution, our share in Sophia's "correction." They do this,
    Gnostics claimed, because they envy us. Archons lack both ennoia (singular
    intentionality) and epinoia (moral-creative imagination), and they
    want to have this specific endowment of ours, to assimilate or steal it.
    This diagnosis of Archontic intrusion conforms in many respects to
    reports of people who have encountered alien entities, especially the
    Grays and the Reptilians.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),189.

    Quote ]acques Vallee sees in the ET phenomenon a
    broad mutation of the religious experience of humankind. His warning
    that the ET,UFO enigma hides a "spiritual control system" comes very
    close to the Gnostic analysis. After initially assuming benevolence,
    Vallee concluded that alien intrusion is sinister and predatory. This is
    also the Gnostic view.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),290.


    Quote In Angels and Aliens, Keith Thompson emphasizes
    the collective or archetypal interpretation of ETs, based on Jungian psychology.
    In this view, the Archons would be trickster-type enrities whose
    effect on us depends on how we "play" them. John Keel has also stressed
    the trickster-like aspect of aliens: the way "the Phenomenon" (as Keel
    calls it) shape-shifts, momentarily conforming to our beliefs about it and
    then, quite suddenly, contradicting what we believe.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),290.



    Quote The Gnostic seers insisted that Archons cannot control or
    manipulate us unless we give them power to do so. This happens when we
    do not optimize nous, our endowment of divine intelligence.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),291.

    Quote ...when we fail to detect and correct our rnistakes they can extrapolate
    wildly and spin us beyond human limits. The Archons intrude at just that
    point where we let our errors go uncorrected, and lend their deviant force
    to what is already going off course, taking us with them in a wayward
    spiral. Without our cosmic cousins in the picture we would still commit
    errors, but we would always be able to stand back and correct our course
    before we got too far out of alignment with Gaia and our own potential.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),291.


    Quote If the Gnostics were right, Archons really do exist in their own realm
    as inorganic, extraterrestrial forms, and as programs in our minds.
    Salvationism is an ideological virus spread by an alien species and
    enacted by humans who fall under their subterfuge. Such is the bizarre
    warning contained in the sci-fi theology of the Gnostics.
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006),291.

    to be continued...
    Last edited by Roisin; 1st September 2014 at 08:46.

  4. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Roisin For This Post:

    Cara (31st August 2014), Carmen (31st August 2014), Debra (31st August 2014), Frederick Jackson (1st September 2014), Jean-Marie (31st August 2014), Limor Wolf (31st August 2014), Marianne (31st August 2014), Marin (31st August 2014), nancyb (1st September 2014), naste.de.lumina (31st August 2014), nicktobias7 (12th September 2014), Pam (15th February 2020), Raven (31st August 2014)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Retired
    Join Date
    7th December 2010
    Location
    Beyond
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,689
    Thanks
    34,680
    Thanked 26,910 times in 3,023 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Thank you, Roisin, I wanted for a long time now to read his commentary on the Nag Hammadi libraries.
    Thanks to you, I just downloaded the PDF book of 'In his own vision', made available here by Bill Ryan on the 'Interesting free books in PDF, plus highly praising customers reviews.

    Here is the full link for those who are interested to read the book

    http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post707561
    Last edited by Limor Wolf; 31st August 2014 at 20:26.

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Limor Wolf For This Post:

    Marianne (31st August 2014), Marin (31st August 2014), MorningFox (31st August 2014), naste.de.lumina (31st August 2014), OmeyocaN777 (31st August 2014), Raven (31st August 2014), Roisin (31st August 2014), sigma6 (31st August 2014)

  7. Link to Post #4
    New Zealand Avalon Member Carmen's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st March 2010
    Location
    New Zealand
    Age
    70
    Posts
    1,838
    Thanks
    5,816
    Thanked 7,500 times in 1,558 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    The information in the book Alien Interview is a useful addition to this information.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Carmen For This Post:

    kirolak (1st September 2014), Marianne (31st August 2014), Marin (31st August 2014), Roisin (31st August 2014)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2012
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4,895
    Thanked 7,269 times in 1,781 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote Posted by Limor (here)
    Thank you, Roisin, I wanted for a long time now to read his commentary on the Nag Hammadi libraries.
    Thanks to you, I just downloaded the PDF book of 'In his own vision', made available here by Bill on the 'Interesting free books in PDF, plus highly praising customers reviews.

    Here is the full link for those who are interested to read the book

    http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post707561
    You're welcome Limor! John Lash's version is a good springboard to use to compare other viewpoints on the topic of Sophia and the Archons. And things get really confusing because there are different interpretations of Lash's own material on this too only some of those who have been interpreting his stuff will sometimes present their own version as John Lash's when, in fact, that's not quite the case at all. That's why I put some of his quotes in this thread for quick reference on what he says in his book and online about, in this case Archons.

    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    Quote Posted by Carmen (here)
    The information in the book Alien Interview is a useful addition to this information.
    Thanks for the tip and I'll check that out!

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roisin For This Post:

    Carmen (31st August 2014), Limor Wolf (31st August 2014), Marin (31st August 2014)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2012
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4,895
    Thanked 7,269 times in 1,781 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Each quote below is from:
    John Lamb Lash, Not In His Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006).
    The number below each quote is the page number.

    Quote Archons lie by omission, never coming out to reveal what they truly
    are. The proof of their malevolence is their refusal to explain themselves
    in clear and honest terms. They take advantage of human credulity by
    appearing to be enigmatic.
    295

    Quote In a sense, the Archons are present in the cosmos to test us so that we are certain
    to make optimal use of our divine endowment. …Could recognition of the Archons be the key to embracing our singularity in the cosmic order?
    296
    (Old Testament narrative…)
    Quote All this is far from what it symbolized in Jewish liturgy: the power of the
    monotheistic male deity who creates the world, and rests from his labor,
    in seven days. To the Gnostics seven was the number of the Archons.
    …Jehovah is the arrogant god who models reality (Archons imitating
    the Pleroma) and imposes a model reality in place of life's organic
    unfoldment. The Archontic tactic is to replicate and dissimulate, so that
    the replica carries values contrary to what it copies.
    333-334


    Quote The leoninereptilian
    Archon, who is also called Yaldabaoth, is dominant and aggressive
    compared to the more passive Archons whose form resembles a prematurely
    born fetus. Although the "chief Archon"is androgynous, it rapidly
    assumes a markedly male, macho posture. He now takes charge of
    the extraordinary situation produced by Sophia's plunge, or at least he
    tries. At the conclusion of episode 5 (from The Apocryphon of John) , the Demiurge proceeds to create a habitat for himself in the vastness of the galactic arms. (a virtual heaven).
    182

    Quote Gnostic cosmological texts explain
    that the many-mansioned heaven of the Demiurge (Reptilian Lord of Archons) is a virtual cosmos, a virtual reality (VR) world.* Although he sees the superanimated patterns
    of the Pleroma only as static, fossil-like forms, not fluid, alive,
    dancing forms, the Demiurge borrows enough sense of order to model
    his world, a habitat for the drone Archons.

    We do not inhabit the planetary system as a whole, we
    inhabit the earth exclusively. The Archons who inhabit the planetary
    system are aliens in our realm.

    On Earth the living, animating
    qualities of the Pleroma form all things.
    183
    Last edited by Roisin; 31st August 2014 at 21:20.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roisin For This Post:

    Carmen (31st August 2014), naste.de.lumina (31st August 2014), Raven (31st August 2014)

  13. Link to Post #7
    UK Avalon Member Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Age
    71
    Posts
    1,063
    Thanks
    29,152
    Thanked 5,113 times in 997 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote Roisin--->Each quote below is from:
    John Lamb Lash, In His Own Image (Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2006).
    Curious about the title here Roisin, the only book I am aware of by John Lamb Lash is 'Not in His Image' (also 2006) Is this a different book?
    "Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves" C. G. Jung

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gardener For This Post:

    kirolak (1st September 2014), Roisin (31st August 2014), sigma6 (1st September 2014)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2012
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4,895
    Thanked 7,269 times in 1,781 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Whoops! Thanks for notifying me of that! Will go back and change that title. lol

    --- update ---
    Done.
    Last edited by Roisin; 31st August 2014 at 21:16.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Roisin For This Post:

    Gardener (31st August 2014)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Avalon Member sigma6's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th July 2011
    Location
    Tattooine
    Posts
    3,428
    Thanks
    8,906
    Thanked 12,641 times in 2,898 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote In the Gnostic perspective the Archons are nor only mind parasites, delusional
    nodes in the human mind, considered as quasi-autonomous
    psychic entities, if you will-they are cosmic imposters, parasites who
    pose as gods. But they lack the primary divine factor of ennoia,"intentionality,"
    "creative will." They cannot originate anything, they can only
    imitate, and they must effectuate their copycat activity with subterfuge
    and stealth, lest its true nature be detected.
    I just listened to an interview on Veritas, about a woman (one Angela T. Smith) who used to work with Ingo Swan, and has purported to have contacted 17 different alien species via "remote viewing" techniques. I find these types of "investigations" interesting, and the interview was "ok" to "pretty good" but there is always a huge ambiguity that surrounds these supposed "events" and I wasn't really all that impressed with her "answers" given that she claims to have had direct conscious discussion with 17 alien species via remote viewing technology. Her answers came off vague, generic, unspecific, blaming the aliens for witholding info, etc... that part just wasn't compelling to me at all.

    What really caught my attention, was that she very casually stated, without prompting or directly answering a question, more as a statement of her own personal observation, like she almost said it unconsciously, as if it were a given... that they don't seem to have intentionality? I thought that was an odd statement. She mentioned several times there was a hive mentality to their personality. Even the supposed Nordics! This really struck me. I was listening to this like I listen to all alien contact stories, always with John Lamb Lash's interpretation of the Archons in the back of my mind.

    I have to admit, it makes more and more sense the more I look at it... It is a very high level all encompassing explanation, that really does make sense on so many levels. It explains their odd behaviour that never quite adds up. I do think there are real alien species out there. But if people think they are contacting them telepathically, I am going to guess a very huge percentage are actually archon interventions. That would be right down their alley...

    Game over.
    Last edited by sigma6; 31st August 2014 at 22:46.
    We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time
    By faith we understand things which are seen were not made of the things which are visible

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sigma6 For This Post:

    Carmen (31st August 2014), Frederick Jackson (1st September 2014), Gardener (1st September 2014), kirolak (1st September 2014), Roisin (1st September 2014)

  19. Link to Post #10
    United States Deactivated
    Join Date
    2nd November 2013
    Age
    50
    Posts
    206
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 442 times in 154 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Hello Rosen

    I find I must enter my two cents here. Everything written here is everything I have found to be true in them so far. I am in constant contact with them every minute of everyday. They(archons) have no way of defining themselves, I believe they even trick themselves about things. They evolved on that side of the veil or that spectrum of light. they hear our thoughts about things even the words we write here finding people that speak of things like ufos, aliens, astral projection, obes, religion. They are curious but deceitful, they use people through their thoughts and lead them places through controlled thinking. My knowledge of them keeps evolving as they speak more and more about things or memories they have of things. They have the power over the mind able to create imaginations, extreme emotional conflicts, unbalanced thoughts, confusion, schizophrenia, phobias and many other things that allow them control over your thoughts. How am I immune to there effects the only thing I can think of is powessy when he ascended into me. Several months after he ascended into me is when they started coming and since then they have not stopped coming. The other sensitivity he has given me is the ability to feel them around my crown and their creations made of thought forms with the ability to trick the body and manipulate things around them. I see them in many people all over the internet as I keep seeking them out finding them in the words of people here and there. Now the fact they seek control over the mind of people seeking questions of the world is due to their curiosity of us and their want to become us. Now they can only see through your imagination your thoughts and emotional feelings other then this they are blind to this side as we are blind to their side of things. The stronger the emotions one has the stronger the grip they have on them, the more the grip the more problems we have falling and spiraling into their world through lack of nutrition, anxiety, depression, alcoholism, drugs and for some suicide.

    Powessy

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to powessy For This Post:

    kirolak (1st September 2014), Roisin (1st September 2014)

  21. Link to Post #11
    United States Deactivated
    Join Date
    2nd November 2013
    Age
    50
    Posts
    206
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 442 times in 154 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote Posted by sigma6 (here)
    Quote In the Gnostic perspective the Archons are nor only mind parasites, delusional
    nodes in the human mind, considered as quasi-autonomous
    psychic entities, if you will-they are cosmic imposters, parasites who
    pose as gods. But they lack the primary divine factor of ennoia,"intentionality,"
    "creative will." They cannot originate anything, they can only
    imitate, and they must effectuate their copycat activity with subterfuge
    and stealth, lest its true nature be detected.
    I just listened to an interview on Veritas, about a woman (one Angela T. Smith) who used to work with Ingo Swan, and has purported to have contacted 17 different alien species via "remote viewing" techniques. I find these types of "investigations" interesting, and the interview was "ok" to "pretty good" but there is always a huge ambiguity that surrounds these supposed "events" and I wasn't really all that impressed with her "answers" given that she claims to have had direct conscious discussion with 17 alien species via remote viewing technology. Her answers came off vague, generic, unspecific, blaming the aliens for witholding info, etc... that part just wasn't compelling to me at all.

    What really caught my attention, was that she very casually stated, without prompting or directly answering a question, more as a statement of her own personal observation, like she almost said it unconsciously, as if it were a given... that they don't seem to have intentionality? I thought that was an odd statement. She mentioned several times there was a hive mentality to their personality. Even the supposed Nordics! This really struck me. I was listening to this like I listen to all alien contact stories, always with John Lamb Lash's interpretation of the Archons in the back of my mind.

    I have to admit, it makes more and more sense the more I look at it... It is a very high level all encompassing explanation, that really does make sense on so many levels. It explains their odd behaviour that never quite adds up. I do think there are real alien species out there. But if people think they are contacting them telepathically, I am going to guess a very huge percentage are actually archon interventions. That would be right down their alley...

    Game over.
    Hello sigma6

    There are many of them all in one, they can have thousands of voices if they find voices inside the person asking them things. They find our words and can speak to us telepathically, they can speak to anyone here. The main problem is they do not know how to think or use their own thoughts. They use your thoughts and then manipulate those thoughts over and over again creating stories full of emotion and newer thoughts, this is how they learn. They need your imaginations and images to learn things, new thoughts to new problems is their ability to learn. They understand many things but do not know how to tie thoughts and images together and will do anything to understand new thoughts. They find that lying and redirection of thoughts allows them new thoughts but are not even sure how these thoughts are processed between them. The woman who spoke to all these races of aliens was just them having fun with her. They don't have a conscious just the urge to become something here and that's all. I wonder how many people they have corrupted and wreck their lives, do to their attachment to thoughts.

    Here's an example. I have been trying to see what memories they have about things. To do this you must be able to ask a question and then have no thoughts about anything(thought without thought). Today I asked them to talk about their earliest memories, they told me they remembered moving into and around and through things. They said that everything was dark and they thought they were in caves in a time before man. I did a few searches on google about organisms found in caves and I came across albino fish after looking and discussing many other things also found in caves. They said they remembered being fish, inside the fish and when the fish died they would move on to more fish, many things all moving together. The thing is they could not remember how they moved past the cave or what came next. Days earlier they said they were different animals like dogs and cats and alligators and had no memories before this time. they just create stories and find new thoughts about the stories and images in my mind about the story they tell. It is the person hearing the story that is also at fault due to our need for answers and our want to be special.

    powessy
    Last edited by powessy; 1st September 2014 at 07:19.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to powessy For This Post:

    Roisin (1st September 2014)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Age
    47
    Posts
    3,931
    Thanks
    27,040
    Thanked 20,865 times in 3,643 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote Posted by Carmen (here)
    The information in the book Alien Interview is a useful addition to this information.
    I agree in so much as the story imparts some significant concepts through the art of fiction. But, our own Bill Ryan and Graham Hancock have exposed this story as a fraud. Per Bill Ryan below you can find here. HOAX: Lawrence Spencer's Alien Interview

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Roisin (1st September 2014)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member kirolak's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th April 2013
    Posts
    802
    Thanks
    8,993
    Thanked 4,243 times in 741 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Just my two cents worth here : How would the external existence of Archons tie in with the multitudes of Egos that comprise us all, in the view of Gnostic teachers, I wonder? I know that Samael Aun Weor uses the word Ego rather differently from what Jung used it; SAW sees the conflicting false "I"s as jostling for supremacy in the human mind, none of them the True Being. Would Lash's Archons be internal to our process or external (& is there really any difference?) I am talking myself into a corner. . .! I read all I could get of Lash's writing a few years ago, & SA Weor prior to that & hope that both of them along with Gurdjieff have "cooked" in my alchemical oven. . .

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kirolak For This Post:

    DNA (1st September 2014), Gardener (1st September 2014), Roisin (2nd September 2014)

  27. Link to Post #14
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Age
    47
    Posts
    3,931
    Thanks
    27,040
    Thanked 20,865 times in 3,643 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote Posted by kirolak (here)
    Just my two cents worth here : How would the external existence of Archons tie in with the multitudes of Egos that comprise us all, in the view of Gnostic teachers, I wonder? I know that Samael Aun Weor uses the word Ego rather differently from what Jung used it; SAW sees the conflicting false "I"s as jostling for supremacy in the human mind, none of them the True Being. Would Lash's Archons be internal to our process or external (& is there really any difference?) I am talking myself into a corner. . .! I read all I could get of Lash's writing a few years ago, & SA Weor prior to that & hope that both of them along with Gurdjieff have "cooked" in my alchemical oven. . .
    I like where your going with this.

    From what I've read of the Nag Hummadi, the Gnostics were not so much concerned with an external Archon, but instead a internal ego that was the crowning jewel of the demiurge, of whom the Gnostics referred to as Yaldaboath, the blind idiot Godling who made our Universe.

    It is my opinion, that archons do in fact exist, but they are also at the mercy of the Demiurge, and are acting out of ego when they attempt to steal the energy of human beings.

  28. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Gardener (1st September 2014), kirolak (2nd September 2014), Roisin (2nd September 2014)

  29. Link to Post #15
    Norway Deactivated
    Join Date
    22nd February 2014
    Age
    49
    Posts
    873
    Thanks
    3,114
    Thanked 5,021 times in 794 posts

    Lightbulb Re: John Lash on Archons

    In this episode I speak with John Lash about the origin of the gnostic teachings, how this knowledge suppressed throughout history, how can it relate to, and empower people today, the birth of the archons and the bigger cosmic picture, and how it relates to what is happening today. We also talk about addressing fear and creating from a place of ecstasy. Check this article out for more backround: http://www.metahistory.org/gnostique...ticOrigins.php

    Also: abiogenesis of acari insects- explains how an insect species can be generated from stress in an electromagnetic field - http://www.rexresearch.com/crosse/crosse.htm

    website: www.metahistory.org


  30. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to linksplatinum For This Post:

    Fairy Friend (15th September 2014), gardener2 (14th September 2014), Hazel (14th September 2014), karelia (14th September 2014), lisalu (14th September 2014), NancyV (14th September 2014), TommyPicklock (14th February 2020), vmk22 (14th September 2014)

  31. Link to Post #16
    Germany Avalon Member TommyPicklock's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th February 2020
    Location
    Germany/Bavaria/Frankonia
    Language
    German
    Age
    65
    Posts
    28
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 135 times in 25 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    In the past few years, I repeatedly experienced that "you do not find books - the books find you". More or less incidentially, I stumbled upon this thread, downloaded the book "Not In HIS Name". Am just reading and knew after the first few pages that this book was what I needed to read in this moment. It perfectly fits into my current position and into my current search.

    Btw. the link mentioned at the beginning of this thread didn't work. I got the book from https://ia800902.us.archive.org/27/i...%282006%29.pdf for pdf download.

    I want to thank Roisin for the creation of this thread and introducting words (were quite a number ), and linksplatinum for the link to the video.
    Thank you.

    Tommy

  32. The Following User Says Thank You to TommyPicklock For This Post:

    Pam (15th February 2020)

  33. Link to Post #17
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    23,212
    Thanks
    86,562
    Thanked 293,361 times in 21,703 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Do see this thread, which is important. A complicated story to tell (all on that thread), but the guy is really pretty dangerous.

  34. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Deux Corbeaux (14th February 2020), Mark/Rahkyt (14th February 2020), OopsWrongPlanet? (14th February 2020), Pam (15th February 2020), Sophocles (15th February 2020), TommyPicklock (15th February 2020), Victoria (15th February 2020), Yoda (15th February 2020)

  35. Link to Post #18
    United States Avalon Member Chester's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    a lovely park bench
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,564
    Thanks
    31,734
    Thanked 28,868 times in 5,196 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Quote Posted by TommyPicklock (here)
    In the past few years, I repeatedly experienced that "you do not find books - the books find you". More or less incidentially, I stumbled upon this thread, downloaded the book "Not In HIS Name". Am just reading and knew after the first few pages that this book was what I needed to read in this moment. It perfectly fits into my current position and into my current search.

    Btw. the link mentioned at the beginning of this thread didn't work. I got the book from https://ia800902.us.archive.org/27/i...%282006%29.pdf for pdf download.

    I want to thank Roisin for the creation of this thread and introducting words (were quite a number ), and linksplatinum for the link to the video.
    Thank you.

    Tommy
    Do you mean this book? Not in His Image
    All the above is all and only my opinion - all subject to change and not meant to be true for anyone else regardless of how I phrase it.

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to Chester For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th February 2020)

  37. Link to Post #19
    Germany Avalon Member TommyPicklock's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th February 2020
    Location
    Germany/Bavaria/Frankonia
    Language
    German
    Age
    65
    Posts
    28
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 135 times in 25 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Sorry, my mistake. I did mean "Not In His Image". Must have come because currently I have much to do with christians who very much want to speak in His Name.

  38. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TommyPicklock For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th February 2020), Pam (15th February 2020)

  39. Link to Post #20
    Germany Avalon Member TommyPicklock's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th February 2020
    Location
    Germany/Bavaria/Frankonia
    Language
    German
    Age
    65
    Posts
    28
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 135 times in 25 posts

    Default Re: John Lash on Archons

    Bill Ryan, just read the introduction to the Kalika War Party thread. Am still reading "Not In His Image". But from what I got as an overview, it reads for me like a very present story.

    Regards
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 15th February 2020 at 10:12. Reason: added the thread link

  40. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TommyPicklock For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th February 2020), Pam (15th February 2020)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts