This is outright peculiar, especially the part where they say you won't come back.
http://www.news.com.au/technology/sc...-1225945124330
This is outright peculiar, especially the part where they say you won't come back.
http://www.news.com.au/technology/sc...-1225945124330
Ba-ba-Ra (29th October 2010)
This is the kind of article that makes me verify that it's not april the 1st or theonion.com. Apparently it's not...
Well is funny to me but quite understandable that the best way to keep an astronaut mouth shut is not bring them back home, makes you wonder just how many men and women are exploring other planets like Mars without public knowledge.
One peculiar detail that has been mention by whistle blowers is that Mars is already inhabited by humans and EBE's alike and that green is a common color like in vegetation. Now for one second imagine these people coming home and relating their experiences, how long can our governments keep calling whistle blowers wackos and discrediting every legitimate whistle blower who has dare to come forward.
Catch 22 for NASA and those trying to keep taps on the flow of information is that even if they wanted to it would be almost impossible to reveal all of the underhanded activities they have been involved with concerning the ET agendas so my guess is volunteers via a one way trip to space and other planets will be the norm killing two birds with one stone; new NASA lifetime recruits who will never set foot on planet Earth again therefore diminishing security risk via leaked whistle blower information.
If you want a totally unfounded conspiracy theory opinion this is a test of response to see how willing people are to get aboard craft on the proviso they never return.
Who or what may want people for such a purpose, if true, is an interesting thing to ponder. But this is pure speculation of course.
(Interesting especially if connected with a meme being pushed by certain new age guru George Kavassilas about allowing loved ones to board craft of known hostile ETs.)
Could it not be just what it is ? A one way trip because they cannot get back or do we see conspiracy in everything ?
Last edited by scanner; 29th October 2010 at 11:01.
According to Henry Deacon, he and many others have been there and back. If his story is credible, it makes that part of the article suspicious. And frankly I trust the word of a whistleblower over NASA any day.Posted by scanner (here)
Could it not be just what it is ? A one way trip because they cannot get back or do we see cosperacy in everything ?
Just to let us get used that there will be one-way trips soon. By asking for volunteers they can measure the readiness for this idea.
yes, i think the article is suspicious too..or else they are running a parallel programmme to say the least...just how do they plan to take the volunteer astronauts over to mars - based on which to say "it's too costly to bring them beack"? if it's aaccording to henry deacon's account (who's been and come back) no space ships are requiredAccording to Henry Deacon, he and many others have been there and back. If his story is credible, it makes that part of the article suspicious. And frankly I trust the word of a whistleblower over NASA any day.
to "ferry" the personnel as the "jump rooms" are used for such missions...
l
.