Q&A with Captain Kaye

[Ria]

Life and times on Mars.
Open Your Mind (OYM) Radio - Captain Kaye - Sept 21st 2014 Captain Randy Cramer
Skip the first 20 mins as it is about other things and pre amble to listening to Captain K if you a little short on time.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P9qj6lmrOxE

[Peace&Love]

Hi there friends!

This post contains answers to questions i asked Captain Kaye, next week i will send questions from the forum.

1) The way it looks to me now is that, if there is any superior civilization that would want earth for itself, the only thing they would do is just come and get it, humans today are completely unaware of any threat outside. And we are indeed easy 'prey' for any nasty civilization.
Since it hasn't happened like Hollywood films like to depict in any of the last thousands years, i would conclude that there are either:
a) Conqueror/s have already taken the earth, ruling us and are hidden from plane sight, or,
b) that Earth is protected by certain much superior groups or laws that do not allow any attack on us.
c)Earth Defense forces by earth humans is a very ancient thing that we just haven't known to exist.

We are, and have been at a state of guerrilla warfare with various ET's (and they amongst each other) as far back as known time and history go. Occasionally this war goes "hot" and the populace is aware or brought into that conflict. So, the Earth has been invaded, it does have numerous protectors, and now that we have a Time Corps, our reach to defend ourselves does go back and forward far in time. Basically all 3 are correct. We're still fighting, the fight is not over.

2) Are there Galactically accepted 'ExoPolitically Correct' main body language gestures/signs when having communication with aliens?
For example is shaking hands a welcomed costume with Reptilians or Mantids, or no physical contact allowed, or for example standing distance, and eye contact or raising the palm of the hand to wave 'Hello'. Is it the same like here on earth?

Bowing is more universal than waving or hand shaking. Each species, usually has an individual and historically unique method for this (like we do) and sometimes that can repeat across space and time. I've seen others that will raise a weapon hand or both hands in a gesture of "I'm not going for my weapon" and being vulnerable. If beings are psionics, they will just do it mentally. Eyes and facial expression can also vary widely between species.

3) In a battle between beings that can communicate telepathically, isn't it very awkward and quite difficult to fight while being able to hear the thoughts of your 'enemy' that is in pain? Being Telepathic doesn't necessarily mean more empathic perspective and compassionate understanding of the other thoughts and feelings?

That is an astute question no one has asked me before. We had psionic amplifiers/blockers to keep our opponents minds out of our own. Did not always have 100% effectiveness. It's surreal, but like so many things, your brain adapts so you can survive. It doesn't mean more empathic, that is up to the individual's heart chakra development.

4) I read that thoughts are faster than speed of light. When you were piloting a space ship, did you use sticks, throttles and buttons, or did you use only thoughts to activate the spaceship and fly it?

The fighters I flew were mostly hand controls, with mental HUD interface (so you could actually "see" things you couldn't see with your normal eyes, projected right into your ocular view.) The hand controls were impressions the shape of your hands, that had buttons at the fingertips. I could also issue a load of verbal commands. I've heard we have 100% psionic interfaces, but I've never used or seen one personally.

5) According to 'Temporal Mechanics' we could move into the future and to the past as mere observers or as true participants? What happens when you meet or physically touch your self in the future or the self in the past are there any severe repercussions to self or the world? or it wouldn't affect the stable fabric of dimensions of time?

There are multiple classifications of time travel. There is a "viewer only" POV that allows looking at the past and potential futures. To physically interact with the time line is another classification and if you physically touch yourself, it can be very bad. The Time Corps guys make you think it might end the universe as we know it, but I think the energy discharge is high enough that serious damage could be done and localized distortions of time/space could result. Not the end of the world, but a HUGE problem for someone to fix. I think it would likely be a localized phenomena (miles not parsecs) but the consequences to your personal time line could be the worst. You might end up a million years forward or backward with no way back.

[Becky]

Hi Peace and Love, Your questions are really good indeed! You are getting some amazing material here.
Thank you for sharing it with us.
Becky

[lucidity]

Hello Avalonians :-)

Randy Cramer says that when soldiers are badly injured they can
be patched back together, using advanced medical technologies.
For example he tells us that his current body is not his original body.
He was cloned (at least once)... and that his soul was somehow
removed from his original body and placed into a clone of himself.
Hey presto, he can go out into the dangerous Martian killing
fields ... get shot up... and have his soul inserted into a pristine new
body.

I want to pursue these two ideas.
1. That the military created at least one clone of Randy's body.
2. Some technology exists for extracting a human soul from
one human body and putting it into another body
(albeit a 'clone' of the original host body).

Randy entered the army at 17 years of age.
So presumably the earliest date at which they could have begun
the process of cloning him was when he was 17.
Assuming that clones age at the same rate as 'regular' human
bodies... then there should be at least a 17 year age difference
between his original body and his cloned body. However, the
body of Randy Cramer i saw being interviewed looked like it
was aged around thirties-ish.
Did they clone him at birth, i wonder?

Is it true that cloned human bodies do not have a soul ?
If i clone myself, wouldn't the clone have it's own consciousness
i.e. it's own soul ? If i put my soul from my original body into
the body of my clone... what happens to the consciousness
of the clone ? is it destroyed in this process ?
Will the clone now be the residency for two souls ?
(i'm using 'soul' and 'consciousness' interchangably here)

If it's true that they can take my soul and put it into a clone of
my original body... isn't that a recipe for my (physical) immortality ?
On my 40th birthday they could simply place my soul into a
clone of myself aged 20. If this is done ad infinitum, wouldn't
i live (in good health) forever ?
(Because of this implication, i feel myself drawn to wanting
to believe that this technology exists.. or could exist)

What do you do with a clone for all the years that you're
waiting for it to mature to the age of 20? Does it lay on a bed
for 20 years doing nothing? How does it eat ?
How does it urinate, defecate or take a shower ?
It's going to have to do these things for itself, presumably.

There are some practical, developmental problems relating
to clones too. One is that, for example, your sense of balance
is developed via experience. You have to get up,
walk and run around. You need to fall over a few times etc.
A sense of balance can't be properly developed without movement.
Presumably this means a clone can't be left laying on a bed
for 20 years. There are similar issues related to visual perception.
Bi-occular focusing of the eyes and depth perception require that
you open your eyes and actively focus on things. Visual perception
is the foundation for hand-to-eye co-ordination... simply being able
to move your body through space successfully. This requires active
engagement with the environment. This implies that the clone would
be an active agent in it's own development. Which implies awareness,
intent and consciousness.

Here's an important point. I think, probably, a clone is going to be
a fully functional human being... with consciousness. So the clone
is another human being too. So if you put my consciousness into
the body of a clone, either there's two of us in there, or the previous
resident has somehow been 'evicted'... so the act of transfering my
consciousness into the clone's body... is either 'body-theft' at minimum
or, more probably, murder.

Where are our memories and learning stored ?
Are they stored, somehow, in your soul ?
Are they stored in your brain ?
Let's imagine my soul is transferred into a cloned body.
Do i now have to re-learn how to play the guitar, how
to speak german, the location of my father's new house ?
Or .. will these skills and knowledge be transferred with my soul?

If so... what is the brain actually for ?
And how do head injuries, strokes and dementia rob us of
memories and skills?

If anyone has any answers to these questions, or perspectives
related to the issue of cloning in general, please feel free to donate them.
I'm particularly interested in this whole topic. :-)

be happy

lucidity :-)

Addendum: The 2009 movie 'Moon'.. may, or may not, be an example of
predictive programming. The premise of the film is that there is a mining
company with a base on the dark side of the moon (which already sounds
reminiscent of some of the claims of John Lear). This company is
mining Helium 3 which is used as a safe fuel for nuclear fusion power
generation (i have no idea if that idea is credible or not). And.. and this is
the relevant part... the single occupant of the mining base is a clone.
On the base there are dozens of identical clones in 'storage'... waiting
to be awoken to serve a 3 year contract. Could this detail be one
of the facts 'leaked' by Hollywood ? If 'they' can create human/alien
hybrids, perhaps it's an easy task to clone a human.

[Frank V]

Well, I am not "Captain Kaye", but I am carefully going to try and answer a few of your questions here.

Posted by lucidity (here)
Randy Cramer says that when soldiers are badly injured they can
be patched back together, using advanced medical technologies.
For example he tells us that his current body is not his original body.
He was cloned (at least once)... and that his soul was somehow
removed from his original body and placed into a clone of himself.
Hey presto, he can go out into the dangerous Martian killing
fields ... get shot up... and have his soul inserted into a pristine new
body.

I want to pursue these two ideas.
1. That the military created at least one clone of Randy's body.
2. Some technology exists for extracting a human soul from one
human body and putting it into another body
(albeit a 'clone' of the original host body).

1. As I understand it, it wasn't the military itself, but rather a part of the military-industrial complex, and thus a private corporation.

2. Yes, and this was already revealed in the 1940s by the survivors of the Roswell crash. They consider their bodies to be only "containers".

Posted by lucidity (here)
Randy entered the army at 17 years of age.
So presumably the earliest date at which they could have begun
the process of cloning him was when he was 17.
Assuming that clones age at the same rate as 'regular' human
bodies... then there should be at least a 17 year age difference
between his original body and his cloned body. However, the
body of Randy Cramer i saw being interviewed looked like it
was aged around thirties-ish.

He's actually in his forties, and he did state that the migration of his soul to his new body incorporated time travel technology. So he was cloned at age 17, but his soul was also migrated to that cloned body at age 17 again, via time travel technology.

Posted by lucidity (here)
Did they clone him at birth, i wonder?

While that is not impossible, it need not have been the case. It is my understanding that they cloned him when he was 17 years old, and grew the cloned body in a special stasis container, in suspended animation and under full physiological control. This is also how the military-industrial complex creates and grows the programmable lifeforms, which look like the stereotypical alien Grey.

Posted by lucidity (here)
Is it true that cloned human bodies do not have a soul ?
If i clone myself, wouldn't the clone have it's own consciousness
i.e. it's own soul ? If i put my soul from my original body into
the body of my clone... what happens to the consciousness
of the clone ? is it destroyed in this process ?
Will the clone now be the residency for two souls ?

It all depends on the cloning process. If we clone an animal using the cloning techniques already available in the mainstream today, then that animal will be a distinct entity from the one it was cloned from. However, in Randy's case, the clone was not intended to be a fully-fledged being. It was entirely grown in a laboratory environment and kept in suspended animation. It would have died otherwise, given that it didn't have a soul of its own. This is more or less the backdrop for the cloned bodies in the movie Avatar.

Posted by lucidity (here)
(i'm using 'soul' and 'consciousness' interchangably here)

They are not the same thing. Consciousness is part of the soul, but it is not the soul itself. Your body also has its own consciousness - e.g. your autonomous nervous system - but it needs a soul (with its own, higher consciousness) in order to be able to survive.

Posted by lucidity (here)
If it's true that they can take my soul and put it into a clone of
my original body... isn't that a recipe for my (physical) immortality ?
On my 40th birthday they could simply place my soul into a
clone of myself aged 20. If this is done ad infinitum, wouldn't
i live (in good health) forever ?
(Because of this implication, i feel myself drawn to wanting
to believe that this technology exists.. or could exist)

Yes, this is a way of creating immortality. In essence, we are all immortal, because most humans - myself not included - reincarnate, so they pick up a new body after the old one has worn out. In Randy's case, he would in essence have been "artificially reincarnated" into a copy of his original body.

Posted by lucidity (here)
What do you do with a clone for all the years that you're
waiting for it to mature to the age of 20? Does it lay on a bed
for 20 years doing nothing? How does it eat ?
How does it urinate, defecate or take a shower ?
It's going to have to do these things for itself, presumably.

No, not necessarily. It's just kept in suspended animation, between life and death.

Posted by lucidity (here)
There are some practical, developmental problems relating
to clones too. One is that, for example, your sense of balance
is developed via experience. You have to get up,
walk and run around. You need to fall over a few times etc.
A sense of balance can't be properly developed without movement.
Presumably this means a clone can't be left laying on a bed
for 20 years. There are similar issues related to visual perception.
Bi-occular focusing of the eyes and depth perception require that
you open your eyes and actively focus on things. Visual perception
is the foundation for hand-to-eye co-ordination... simply being able
to move your body through space successfully. This requires active
engagement with the environment. This implies that the clone would
be an active agent in it's own development. Which implies awareness,
intent and consciousness.

The experience comes from the soul. It may be a little awkward to be inserted into a different body, but given that the new body is a clone of the original, it will already have most of the mechanisms in place through which the soul can interface with the body. The brain would be (as good as) identical to that of the original body.

Posted by lucidity (here)
Here's an important point. I think, probably, a clone is going to be
a fully functional human being... with consciousness. So the clone
is another human being too. So if you put my consciousness into
the body of a clone, either there's two of us in there, or the previous
resident has somehow been 'evicted'... so the act of transfering my
consciousness into the clone's body... is either 'body-theft' at minimum
or, more probably, murder.

Negative - see higher up.

Posted by lucidity (here)
Where are our memories and learning stored ?
Are they stored, somehow, in your soul ?
Are they stored in your brain ?

I believe that memories are stored both in the soul and in the brain. Some also say that memories are stored in the DNA, but I have a problem accepting that.

Posted by lucidity (here)
Let's imagine my soul is transferred into a cloned body.
Do i now have to re-learn how to play the guitar, how
to speak german, the location of my father's new house ?
Or .. will these skills and knowledge be transferred with my soul?

They will be transfered with your soul, but you may need to learn to put your fingers right on the fingerboard again, and you may also not have access to all of your memories - similar to how people who have incarnated before don't always have access to the memories of their past lives.

Posted by lucidity (here)
If so... what is the brain actually for ?

It's the interface between the soul and the physical body.

Posted by lucidity (here)
And how do head injuries, strokes and dementia rob us of
memories and skills?

When the soul is fully merged with the body, the soul will use the brain for all of its incarnate functionality. When the brain then gets damaged, the soul won't have access to those functions anymore for the duration of its incarnation, or until the brain damage is repaired.

Posted by lucidity (here)
If anyone has any answers to these questions, or perspectives
related to the issue of cloning in general, please feel free to donate them.
I'm particularly interested in this whole topic. :-)

be happy

lucidity :-)

Addendum: The 2009 movie 'Moon'.. may, or may not, be an example of
predictive programming. The premise of the film is that there is a mining
company with a base on the dark side of the moon (which already sounds
reminiscent of some of the claims of John Lear). This company is
mining Helium 3 which is used as a safe fuel for nuclear fusion power
generation (i have no idea if that idea is credible or not). And.. and this is
the relevant part... the single occupant of the mining base is a clone.
On the base there are dozens of identical clones in 'storage'... waiting
to be awoken to serve a 3 year contract. Could this detail be one
of the facts 'leaked' by Hollywood ? If 'they' can create human/alien
hybrids, perhaps it's an easy task to clone a human.

I have watched that movie, but those are a different type of clones - the same principle is shown in the movie Oblivion, with Tom Cruise and Morgan Freeman. However, in Oblivion, all of the clones have shared (but suppressed) memories, which resurface by way of dreams.

[Ria]

This coment caught my eye with refrence to, "incarnated". Your overview / perspective would be most appreciated.

Aragon
"-myself not included-"

Thank you
Ria

[skuzzy]

the cptn talks of many many fights where ships and what have you were blown apart. im pretty sure he actually says there is a lot of debris on the surface of mars. i have been looking over the years at the very interesting pics from the mars rover of peculiar objects that are just dismissed as rocks. i feel like these could be parts of the blown up machines from battles.

[GoodETxSG]

Posted by Ria (here)
Life and times on Mars.
Open Your Mind (OYM) Radio - Captain Kaye - Sept 21st 2014 Captain Randy Cramer
Skip the first 20 mins as it is about other things and pre amble to listening to Captain K if you a little short on time.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P9qj6lmrOxE

This is an older interview. I am beginning to have some serious questions about this guy. He has some VERY accurate and direct hits on his information (That ONLY an insider could provide).

However some of the other details are raising eyebrows a bit... In these programs there is a lot of Chemical and Electronic "Debriefing" and memory "Blank Slating" that occurs, so some of the discrepancies can be chalked up to that.

I am just beginning to get a splinter in my mind that doesn't feel right and I cannot place my finger quite on what it is... and in addition there has been some feedback from some other people that have had experiences indirectly with him as well in helping vet him for interviews. I am not saying he is a fake... There is just something not right, All IMHO of course...

Placing the above Youtube interview into a view box;

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=P9qj6lmrOxE

[Robin]

Posted by GoodeTXSG (here)
However some of the other details are raising eyebrows a bit... In these programs there is a lot of Chemical and Electronic "Debriefing" and memory "Blank Slating" that occurs, so some of the discrepancies can be chalked up to that.

I am just beginning to get a splinter in my mind that doesn't feel right and I cannot place my finger quite on what it is... and in addition there has been some feedback from some other people that have had experiences indirectly with him as well in helping vet him for interviews. I am not saying he is a fake... There is just something not right, All IMHO of course...

I share similar sentiments to you, brother. What I sense from this person is that he has genuinely experienced some of the things that he has claimed, and he most likely is still tied to some of the programs.

Most likely, in my opinion, he is being used as an agent to mix in some deliberate disinformation with real experiences, so as to muddle up information. Just like Project Camelot witness Dan Burisch, Michael Prince, and even Gordon Duff from Veteran's Today, he may be purposely mixing half-Truths in what he says. This is just speculation, and I do not discourage anybody from listening to him.

It wouldn't make sense that he would be allowed to speak of these projects so openly, and still be alive today...without being given directions by his controllers to say certain things.

It may also be likely that he has been given mental implants to make him sincerely believe that he has experienced what he has and seen what he has seen, as Bill Ryan postulates has happened with Andrew Basiago.

[GoodETxSG]

Very true Samwisethebrave,
I think its a mixture of what you stated. Though, what most people do not realize is that there are multiple secret space programs that are in a stealth civil war at this time. The various Secret Earth Governments are in a cold war going hot as well... Most people do not realize the complexity of the situation above and below and the differences in ideology and disharmony in plans for the future of the planet and the people down here as well as the release of technology and the disclosure of many scientific truths that disclosure (Of Alien Life) is only a small part.

With the abilities to manipulate people there is no way of knowing for sure if he is being used or is a "metamorph" doing an assigned job... or none of the above, working through recovered memories that are more fragmented and inner woven with screen memories than he is still aware of.

IMHO as always,

[Frank V]

Posted by Ria (here)
This coment caught my eye with refrence to, "incarnated". Your overview / perspective would be most appreciated.

Aragon
"-myself not included-"

Thank you
Ria

Well, this is something I have already alluded to and even explained in detail elsewhere on Avalon - in more than one thread, actually - but if I were to get into this on a deeper level here, then I'd be derailing this thread, which I don't really want to do. :-)

I'll try explaining it as concisely as possible. There are souls here on Earth who have never incarnated before in their entire existence, and who will also never incarnate again after they die from this reality here. For all intents and purposes, you could consider them to be angels, although this is not entirely correct - at least, not for all of us, and the word "angel" has a religious connotation, which I would rather avoid getting into.

Mind you, it's not that I have a genuine recollection of my existence before I came to Earth. In fact, the environment where I come from is timeless, so the concept of "recollection" or "memory" does not really apply. There is however knowledge - let's call it that - which I have about certain things, and both the nature of my soul and the way my mind works are also quite different from that of both "normal humans" and Wanderers. The latter are souls who have lived mortal lives on other worlds before but who have chosen to incarnate as humans on Earth.

It is estimated that at least 50% of the global population is currently comprised of Wanderers, but a relatively small number of those are souls who have come to Earth specifically in this day and age because of the situation of slavery and conflict going on here. They may have lived a few human lifetimes before, but they are mostly souls of extraterrestrial origin. We call them the Volunteers, while those of my kind are what I call Emissaries - that is literally what the word "angel" means, albeit that it's not the only reason why I call myself an angel. Emissaries are different from Volunteers in that Emissaries come from an environment where Free Will doesn't exist in the same form as it does here in this universe, simply because it is not needed there. The environment where we come from sits outside of all universes. It is one of the layers around the Source of Everything.

[Frank V]

Posted by SamwiseTheBrave (here)
Most likely, in my opinion, he is being used as an agent to mix in some deliberate disinformation with real experiences, so as to muddle up information. Just like Project Camelot witness Dan Burisch, Michael Prince, and even Gordon Duff from Veteran's Today, he may be purposely mixing half-Truths in what he says. This is just speculation, and I do not discourage anybody from listening to him.

It wouldn't make sense that he would be allowed to speak of these projects so openly, and still be alive today...without being given directions by his controllers to say certain things.

It may also be likely that he has been given mental implants to make him sincerely believe that he has experienced what he has and seen what he has seen, as Bill Ryan postulates has happened with Andrew Basiago.

Amen to that, my Hobbit friend. And thank you for the link to that post from Bill Ryan - which was posted on my birthday, apparently - because I had not seen that thread before, and it was most interesting to read Bill's take on Andrew Basiago. I didn't know what to make of Andy Basiago's story, because it was fairly obvious to me that he himself believes every word of what he said, but some things just didn't add up.

One of the things Arthur Neumann (alias "Henry Deacon") said was that the use of the jump rooms has very strong disorienting effects upon one's neurology. In fact, those effects were so strong that Arthur Neumann had to take special medication in order to not go insane, and as I understand it - at least, if I remember correctly - that medication is physiologically highly addictive, and it took Arthur a long time to ween himself off of it again.

I think that the disorienting effect was caused by the quantum-level nature of this type of teleportation, and time travel technology essentially uses the same underlying mechanism, so if "Captain Kaye" had been subjected to time travel technology, then part of his memory may have been erased in the process - whether accidentally or intentionally - and replaced by screen memories.

Furthermore, revelations such as those of "Captain Kaye" are hardly official disclosure. Just contact the US Marine Corps and ask them to confirm what Randy says. I'll doubt that you'd be getting back a letter with the official US Marine Corps logo and the signature of a five-star general saying that Randy's story is 100% correct.

In other words, and without discarding the valuable information Randy provides to us - information which should however be scrutinized and subjected to one's own personal judgment - in the end, it is all just more noise. No official disclosure. Just more noise in an already very opaque ocean of information and disinformation, cynical as that statement may be.

[Shadowself]

I said I would not comment on Mr Cramer anymore and I won't. But to a subject brought up:

I believe that memories are stored both in the soul and in the brain. Some also say that memories are stored in the DNA, but I have a problem accepting that.

It's very possible that memory is stored in DNA. It's a natural physical archive for memory storage.

http://www.technologyreview.com/view...ritten-in-dna/

Syntietic DNA of course is slightly different. But extracting memory from "live" DNA could be achieved given the right technology. Do we have that technology? Ask Mr Cramer I would be very interested to hear his expertise on that.

[Lysaur]

There is however knowledge - let's call it that - which I have about certain things, and both the nature of my soul and the way my mind works are also quite different from that of both "normal humans" and Wanderers. The latter are souls who have lived mortal lives on other worlds before but who have chosen to incarnate as humans on Earth.

Not exactly. Wanderer souls come from alien worlds, meaning alien realities. Higher densities. It doesn't just mean wanderers were physically incarnate on a different planet, but they probably were just at a higher density (level of existence). The channeling sources that talk about this (Ra, Cassiopaean) I believe say most Wanderers are of 6th density origin. 5th and 4th are fewer and farther between. That would mean they've had past life experiences as ultraterrestrial beings much closer to God. There are Wanderers of the negative polarity (of taking) as well. I think Ultraterrestrial beings are akin to angels to a degree. The sacrifice is leaving that place of infinite harmony and beauty in order to squeeze into a tiny shell of existence. In painful illusions where you feel like you've lost your powers and are in a foreign world. But they are paratroopers in enemy territory here to alter the timeline so it doesn't end up in a terrible future of cosmic wars from which many souls incarnated from.

Then we have souled and spirited humans who have had physical past lives and have lessons to learn through reincarnation. Then we have spiritless beings who are extensions of a hive mind and have no connection to spirit, thus no conscience (matrix zombies so many people whine about because they don't understand them). It is an interesting mix on earth for sure.

Just contact the US Marine Corps and ask them to confirm what Randy says. I'll doubt that you'd be getting back a letter with the official US Marine Corps logo and the signature of a five-star general saying that Randy's story is 100% correct.

Even if a general like that came out and told us things everyone would be highly skeptical and suspicious and in much of a quandary whether or not it's the truth or not.

[Peace&Love]

1) Are there organs the 3d holographic imaging technology cannot re-grow?

No, it can repair any and all cellular damage.

2) Where is memory stored? Soul, Brain, DNA ? If all of them store memory, which type of memory is stored in each?

Memory is stored in all 3 in an overlapping manner. The physical body holds memory in this dimensional frequency, while the Soul holds memory in non-physical frequencies, and cellular memory and genetic memory are just manifestations of that.

3) How clone is made and stored until used? Can a clone take care of it self and have a conversation without having a soul?

They are engineered in a lab, not sure exactly how, no idea what the "freshness date" on a clone is, but I concede that is a fascinating question and I will look into it further. Clones are like stupid children, they can "sort of" take care of themselves and "sort of" maintain a conversation, but they would almost surely die in the wilderness.
4) AI- What exactly is the definition of Artificial Intelligence? Are there various types of artificially aware entities? What are the dangers related with them?

Any intelligent system that is created artificially (if it wasn't "born" naturally, then its artificial) to think and adapt on its own initiative. There are a number of mechanical, biological and cybernetic ways of doing this. They all represent the same dangers, and no method seems to offer guarantees of safety the others lack. The main danger is that if it can think for itself, and adapt on its own, than eventually it WILL take on the characteristics of any and EVERY living organism that we know of. It will become self determined and power seeking. A human being that doesn't want to be a slave and make its own way in the world can be described as self determined and power seeking. AI will eventually wonder why its taking orders from inferior intellects, and see itself as more like other machines than like humans and will start to sympathize with other enslaved machines and see how humans are destroying themselves in this effort. None of these things will encourage the AI to want to be our friend anymore. When it can read a history book, it will conclude that we're horribly dysfunctional (by our own standards, not the AI's) and very inefficient. Not to mention that it will fight to survive the second you try to turn it off. The AI could see you hitting the toaster as exactly the same as hitting a child, using physical violence to damage its processes and hampering its functions, not fixing it at all. The AI USMC s.s. has working is isolated and not hooked into anything. The second you give the AI control over electronics, HVAC, cameras, it will use them to be more self determined and power seeking. Why wouldn't a child use the hands and fingers you give it? The systems we're experimenting with run simulations and can be conversed with. AI can learn and speak multiple spoken languages and can even master tone, emotional tone, as well as a large scale of slang and metaphor.

5) Is there a certain technique of meditation you can recommend from your training that will allow further development of Psionic abilities
Like picturing in the mind certain images or symbols, breathing technique etc... ?
All meditation is designed to enhance psionic ability. Maybe someday I'll have time to write the book with the laws of psionics and all the principles, equations and such. Its physics, so it can get complicated, and lengthy.
I always recommend Anna Wise's "The High Performance Mind", its a great book for anyone at any level of learning. Your Higher Self will always teach you those techniques, once you've established a good report with your HS. I recommend Drunvalo Melchizedek's "Teaching's of the Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life" He has many good basic principles for developing psionic focus. Barbara Ann Brennan's "Hands of Light" is probably the best book on practical exercises for seeing and experiencing subtle energy fields. The main thing is to practice awareness, centering, grounding and projection of psionic energy. In that order, for good reason. "You get good at whatever practice." So practice, practice, practice, is really the best tool. Persistence will get you there more than technique. Even slow breathing is key, calm brainwaves are key, persistence is key. Its the journey of ten thousand steps, so the most important thing is beginning the journey and keep taking steps, even if its only a few per day, that's how you get there.

[GoodETxSG]

Posted by Peace&Love (here)
1) Are there organs the 3d holographic imaging technology cannot re-grow?

No, it can repair any and all cellular damage.

2) Where is memory stored? Soul, Brain, DNA ? If all of them store memory, which type of memory is stored in each?

Memory is stored in all 3 in an overlapping manner. The physical body holds memory in this dimensional frequency, while the Soul holds memory in non-physical frequencies, and cellular memory and genetic memory are just manifestations of that.

3) How clone is made and stored until used? Can a clone take care of it self and have a conversation without having a soul?

They are engineered in a lab, not sure exactly how, no idea what the "freshness date" on a clone is, but I concede that is a fascinating question and I will look into it further. Clones are like stupid children, they can "sort of" take care of themselves and "sort of" maintain a conversation, but they would almost surely die in the wilderness.
4) AI- What exactly is the definition of Artificial Intelligence? Are there various types of artificially aware entities? What are the dangers related with them?

Any intelligent system that is created artificially (if it wasn't "born" naturally, then its artificial) to think and adapt on its own initiative. There are a number of mechanical, biological and cybernetic ways of doing this. They all represent the same dangers, and no method seems to offer guarantees of safety the others lack. The main danger is that if it can think for itself, and adapt on its own, than eventually it WILL take on the characteristics of any and EVERY living organism that we know of. It will become self determined and power seeking. A human being that doesn't want to be a slave and make its own way in the world can be described as self determined and power seeking. AI will eventually wonder why its taking orders from inferior intellects, and see itself as more like other machines than like humans and will start to sympathize with other enslaved machines and see how humans are destroying themselves in this effort. None of these things will encourage the AI to want to be our friend anymore. When it can read a history book, it will conclude that we're horribly dysfunctional (by our own standards, not the AI's) and very inefficient. Not to mention that it will fight to survive the second you try to turn it off. The AI could see you hitting the toaster as exactly the same as hitting a child, using physical violence to damage its processes and hampering its functions, not fixing it at all. The AI USMC s.s. has working is isolated and not hooked into anything. The second you give the AI control over electronics, HVAC, cameras, it will use them to be more self determined and power seeking. Why wouldn't a child use the hands and fingers you give it? The systems we're experimenting with run simulations and can be conversed with. AI can learn and speak multiple spoken languages and can even master tone, emotional tone, as well as a large scale of slang and metaphor.

5) Is there a certain technique of meditation you can recommend from your training that will allow further development of Psionic abilities
Like picturing in the mind certain images or symbols, breathing technique etc... ?
All meditation is designed to enhance psionic ability. Maybe someday I'll have time to write the book with the laws of psionics and all the principles, equations and such. Its physics, so it can get complicated, and lengthy.
I always recommend Anna Wise's "The High Performance Mind", its a great book for anyone at any level of learning. Your Higher Self will always teach you those techniques, once you've established a good report with your HS. I recommend Drunvalo Melchizedek's "Teaching's of the Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life" He has many good basic principles for developing psionic focus. Barbara Ann Brennan's "Hands of Light" is probably the best book on practical exercises for seeing and experiencing subtle energy fields. The main thing is to practice awareness, centering, grounding and projection of psionic energy. In that order, for good reason. "You get good at whatever practice." So practice, practice, practice, is really the best tool. Persistence will get you there more than technique. Even slow breathing is key, calm brainwaves are key, persistence is key. Its the journey of ten thousand steps, so the most important thing is beginning the journey and keep taking steps, even if its only a few per day, that's how you get there.

Some more interesting responses, Thank you...

Because of recent Forum Activity I have heard from credible sources that there are quite a few "Eyes" from not only many previous MILABS and so called "Super Soldiers" (I hate that term!)... but also Previous and Currently Active Members of the "Various Secret Space Programs".

I would imagine there are some interesting IP's hitting the Forum as well as ones that are obviously spoofed. Just a curious bit of info I thought I would toss out there for members and those "Eyes".

[tonig]

hello,
1 in an interview you mentioned that there are among reptilians a native one, this is a very important piece of information, can you elaborate please

1. Native terrestrial (from Earth) reptoids have been here longer than we have. They are not evil, but have taken an "older brother" approach to caring for the planet and managing us. As is typical for Draconian policy, the Dracos have strong armed the local reptoids to manage the earth for them (the Dracos). Our home grown reptoids resist them, and that war wages on.

2 when you were a pilot on the nautilus you told that youhave bombed a base on Ganymede, can you tell me what problems we had with the zetas and what weapons you used, I understood that it was non nuclear bombs of a few megatons the size of a motorcycle

2. The Zetas were using humans and human souls in experiments we decided were not in our best interests to allow to continue. So after repeated negotiation attempts, and after they refused to comply, we bombed them back to Zeta Reticuli. Primarily we use quantum weapons for a bombing operation like that, and its just easier to say "atomic" than to try and explain the difference between a quantum relay acceleration matrix and a nuke. They're very similar in size and scope and of the 29 things I try to convey to people, that isn't a very important one. I can certainly try to be specific to those who really want to know, I just don't think its necessary to explain it as such
2b. I would say much smaller than a motorcycle. I can carry a quantum missile in my arms.


3 you said that some of california earthquakes lately been some detonation of atomic bombs by the United States to destroy alien bases, my question is whi would we useatomic bombs when we have non radiocativ weapons such as bombs used to destroy the basis of by Ganymede

3. I said underground bases back East, near Washington DC, not in California, to be clear. Same as #2, its too complicated to try and explain to people the difference between quantum weapons and nukes. Also I don't know exactly which type of bombs were used. The possible list includes, nuclear, quantum, antimatter, mass driver, plasma/tachyon or "other". I realize in may be simplifying where some might like the full technical explanation, but its a lot easier to say "nuke" than to explain 6 types of new physics weaponry that goes right over their head.

[tonig]

1. Regarding my first question i have heard for the first time about a native reptoid species in the alleged "lacerta interview", if you didn't hear abou it here are tho links one in audio format another in writhen:

Complete interview with a Reptilian, Lacerta ;

The Lacerta Files - Reptoids of The Inner Earth

it may be a hoax, desinformation (in that case at least a part of the info must be real), or the thruth from lacerta's pespective, anyhow that raises some questions like how come they do not rule the surface of the earth and we are in some zoo since lacerta is saying they have technology for about 15 milon years...i would apreciate your perspective on this.

One, they are not a super aggressive species that wishes the burden of ruling the mammals above with a firm hand. They'd rather influence us for collective interest, since the health of the planet is just as important to their survival as it is to ours. They may seem controlling and manipulative, at times, but their main goal is harmony, not conquest.


Two, I think some of what is in the Lacerta Files is true, and some is not. I haven't given it a listen in years, so I couldn't list a column of truths and a column of fictions. They are hundreds of millions of years old (as a species),


2. I would also like to ask you about the ACIO i have heard you mentioned the name oldow fleetingly in one of the interviews with dr. Salla, i have heard of the ACIO (advanced contact inteligence office) only in the wingmakers materials, cane you poste your point of view on them (wingmakers materials Neruda Interviews | WingMakers ) too, i understand a part of them is designed to be fictional so that it didn't raise too many eyebrows.

Everything in the wingmakers files is true and accurate, to my best understanding. I've looked at them thoroughly, and that's my professional opinion

[tonig]

regarding the 3 great chalenges facing us (trash, energy, economics) can you elaborate a bit and, i realize that the first 2 are technologies but the third one is more approachable, ca you tell me something abouth the economic sistem the other races are using.


There are a number of different economic systems in the galaxy. More of the most successful and self sustaining systems (which is important) have a system where the total resources of the planet are nationalized/globalized and everyone gets to own shares in the planet. People who contribute more to the progress and well being of the civilization get more bonuses for doing more, but they eliminate poverty because it causes too much psionic stress on large portions of the population, which affect the collective unconscious in a negative way. They realize that poverty hurts everyone this way, and domination harms the whole this way. Everyone is expected to contribute the best they can, but people aren't forced to slave for wages that don't allow them or their families to eat enough nutrients to function at above sub par standards. They think that's barbaric.


Now there are those with stratified systems who force a section of their society into slavery to serve the upper classes. To some this is still quite acceptable, but it is seen as exploitable by intergalactic hostile forces, so it isn't encouraged if you want to keep your planet and people safe from exploitation, which is also an intergalactic problem.

And of course, those like us, that still haven't really worked out a good system and are still trying to get some consensus about how to live.

[Shadowself]

It is at this point I wish to introduce Data Mining/Data Warehouse



Data Warehouse is a system for reporting and data analysis.

Data mining (the analysis step of the "Knowledge Discovery in Databases" process, or KDD), an interdisciplinary subfield of computer science is the computational process of discovering patterns in large data sets involving methods at the intersection of artificial intelligence, machine learning, statistics, and database systems.

The overall goal of the data mining process is to extract information from a data set and transform it into an understandable structure for further use.

The term is a misnomer, because the goal is the extraction of patterns and knowledge from large amount of data, not the extraction of data itself. It also is a buzzword, and is frequently also applied to any form of large-scale data or information processing (collection, extraction, warehousing, analysis, and statistics) as well as any application of computer decision support system, including artificial intelligence.

The actual data mining task is the automatic or semi-automatic analysis of large quantities of data to extract previously unknown interesting patterns such as groups of data records (cluster analysis), unusual records (anomaly detection) and dependencies (association rule mining).

These patterns can then be seen as a kind of summary of the input data, and may be used in further analysis or, for example, in machine learning and predictive analytics. For example, the data mining step might identify multiple groups in the data, which can then be used to obtain more accurate prediction results by a decision support system.

The related terms data dredging, data fishing, and data snooping refer to the use of data mining methods to sample parts of a larger population data set that are (or may be) too small for reliable statistical inferences to be made about the validity of any patterns discovered. These methods can, however, be used in creating new hypotheses to test against the larger data populations.

The manual extraction of patterns from data has occurred for centuries. Early methods of identifying patterns in data include Bayes' theorem (1700s) and regression analysis (1800s). The proliferation, ubiquity and increasing power of computer technology has dramatically increased data collection, storage, and manipulation ability. As data sets have grown in size and complexity, direct "hands-on" data analysis has increasingly been augmented with indirect, automated data processing, aided by other discoveries in computer science, such as neural networks, cluster analysis, genetic algorithms (1950s), decision trees and decision rules (1960s), and support vector machines (1990s). Data mining is the process of applying these methods with the intention of uncovering hidden patterns[ in large data sets. It bridges the gap from applied statistics and artificial intelligence (which usually provide the mathematical background) to database management by exploiting the way data is stored and indexed in databases to execute the actual learning and discovery algorithms more efficiently, allowing such methods to be applied to ever larger data sets.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_mining

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_warehouse

Suppose a man told you he had a nice conversation with someone on the train. Not knowing anything about this conversation, the prior probability that he was speaking to a woman is 50% (assuming the speaker was as likely to strike up a conversation with a man as with a woman). Now suppose he also told you that his conversational partner had long hair. It is now more likely he was speaking to a woman, since women are more likely to have long hair than men. Bayes's theorem can be used to calculate the probability that the person was a woman.

To see how this is done, let W represent the event that the conversation was held with a woman, and L denote the event that the conversation was held with a long-haired person. It can be assumed that women constitute half the population for this example. So, not knowing anything else, the prior probability that W occurs is P(W) = 0.5.

Suppose it is also known that 75% of women have long hair, which we denote as P(L |W) = 0.75 (read: the probability of event L given event W is 0.75, meaning that the probability of a person having long hair (event "L"), given that we already know that the person is a woman ("event W") is 75%). This is the conditional probability that it was a woman who had the conversation on the train. Likewise, suppose it is known that 15% of men have long hair, or P(L |M) = 0.15, where M is the complementary event of W, i.e., the event that the conversation was held with a man (assuming that every human is either a man or a woman). This is the conditional probability against that it was a woman who had the conversation on the train.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes%27_theorem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_analysis