BBC Doubts raised over authenticity of Charlie Hebdo footage.

[bodhii71]

http://bbc-news.co.uk/doubts-raised-...hebdo-footage/

"January 11, 2015
Doubts raised over authenticity of Charlie Hebdo footage.
A video clip broadcast by news agencies across the world in relation to the recent events in Paris is now under scrutiny.

According to analysts, it appears that the footage was recorded over two takes, evidenced by a placement marker that appears by the front left wheel of the vehicle as the gunmen return from apparently gunning down a wounded Gendarme.

The killing of the french policeman is also being called into question, due to the ‘lack of blood spatter consistent with that of a close range shooting’.

As shown in the freeze frame below, smoke is shown to emit from the weapon, with no impact or trauma appearing to register on the body of the victim. The decision of many news outlets to blur out the victim is being debated as evidence of complicity in what many are now calling a hoax.

Forensic and ballistics expert David Mayhew commented; “If the video shows events as they actually occurred, then in my opinion it is most likely that the firearm shown is discharging blanks rather than conventional ammunition”.

Staged.

Whilst numerous theories have sprung up concerning this and other details, the general consensus among not just skeptics, but some major news agencies, is that the entire event was a ‘False Flag’ attack perpetrated by the CIA and/or Mossad in a “psy-ops” exercise to rouse hatred against Islam and support for what has been so far, a failing campaign in Iraq, Syria and the Middle East."

I don't even know what to make of this article considering it is from the BBC. Perhaps this effort (psy-op) was so seriously debunked that they had no choice but to address it.

[naste.de.lumina]

Unfortunately this 'bbc-news.co.uk' is a fake site. Sorry friend.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post922312

[ceetee9]

Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
Unfortunately this 'bbc-news.co.uk' is a fake site. Sorry friend.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post922312

Damn, I missed that. Should've known better that the MSM, British or not, wouldn't suggest such a thing.

[naste.de.lumina]

Posted by ceetee9 (here)

Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
Unfortunately this 'bbc-news.co.uk' is a fake site. Sorry friend.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post922312

Damn, I missed that. Should've known better that the MSM, British or not, wouldn't suggest such a thing.

The fake site was very well done. Professional thing.
The site appears to have been excluded.

[bodhii71]

Ah, well, sorry for the post. I've been had.

At any rate, it did point out the marker under the car which I hadn't noticed before.

[MorningFox]

Yes it's a fake site but as naste.de.lumina said in the other thread...

Fake site with real news
Real site with fake news.

At least ironic.

How true

[LoneWolf76]

Jim stone freelance covers all the mistakes they made in their Hollywood production...

[MorningFox]

^ do you have a link?

[naste.de.lumina]

Posted by MorningFox (here)
^ do you have a link?

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

[Sunny-side-up]

Still a fake shooting in my books though

[Mutchie]

bodhii71 this has happened to ME before and it is not a nice experience but I APPLAUD YOU for your effort to keep us informed please do not let this put YOU OFF ..... You like many other souls here on Avalon YOU have a lot to offer this forum !!!

your friend Mutchie

[bodhii71]

Thank you for the kind words Mutchie. While I do not feel disheartened, I try not to fill the board with items that dilute the power that is this forum. I became aware of the link from Max Ingram's Facebook account, it didn't even occur to me to think it was a fake site. I was completely taken in, "fish in the net, on the boat".

To think of what the internet could be and what it is... I imagine a world where people are truly informed on all levels of creation, where they could collectively vote on the direction humanity would go. War, poverty, needless labor, energy concerns, and pollution would disappear very quickly. (I wonder if any books have been written that cover such an idea?)
Instead we attempt to collect information, with our best discernment to find truth while other beings do their best to obfuscate and mislead, hiding truth in an attempt to maintain control.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Fake news source but fake shooting too!

[naste.de.lumina]

Posted by bodhii71 (here)
Thank you for the kind words Mutchie. While I do not feel disheartened, I try not to fill the board with items that dilute the power that is this forum. I became aware of the link from Max Ingram's Facebook account, it didn't even occur to me to think it was a fake site. I was completely taken in, "fish in the net, on the boat".

To think of what the internet could be and what it is... I imagine a world where people are truly informed on all levels of creation, where they could collectively vote on the direction humanity would go. War, poverty, needless labor, energy concerns, and pollution would disappear very quickly. (I wonder if any books have been written that cover such an idea?)
Instead we attempt to collect information, with our best discernment to find truth while other beings do their best to obfuscate and mislead, hiding truth in an attempt to maintain control.

It is the intention that counts.
We are all subject to being deceived. The bcc site fake that you posted was very well done.

Before you post the topic, I had been mistaken. So I could warn you so quickly.

Also, the fake site was not lying.

Hugs.

Naste.

[stevcolx]

It may be a Fake News site but the Charlie Hebdo attack was also Fake. I work overseas in a Muslim country and even they are not fooled into believing that the Paris attacks were orchestrated by Muslim attackers. Looks like Israel with their Terror Dogs Mossad were behind this. No surprise there then as Netanyahu did threaten France with 'Grave Consequences' before the attacks!

And that French Policeman video. Shot? By what? A pellet gun? There was not one drop of blood there. You don't need a fake news site to tell you that guy was never shot!

[jeanpistache]

90% of the people know to differentiate muslim religion and terrorism. This is not a way to discredit a community, there is no sense in this theory. I believe that it was organised by secret services for a socio-political reason but not this one i'm sure.

[Maia Gabrial]

There's good sense here, but think about all the duped people who believe this false flag was real. I had to show my brother the truth....

[naste.de.lumina]

BBC News calls Charlie Hebdo a false flag…

…A hoax – but whose? and why?



By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

Last Sunday, eyebrows were raised – not just raised, but lifted right off people’s faces to hover three feet overhead – when BBC News apparently published a story reporting evidence that the Charlie Hebdo shootings were a false flag attack. The story looked and felt real, with none of the clumsy giveaways of your average hoax (think Sorcha Faal) or the outrageous giveaways of your average parody (think Kevin Barrett).

The embedded “BBC” TV news report looked professionally produced and featured yours truly reporting for False Flag Weekly News, also referencing my 9/11 truth movement colleague Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. It discussed evidence that the Charlie Hebdo shootings were fake, including the ballistics evidence presented here at VT by Gordon Duff.

Watch the latest False Flag Weekly News – the show that scared someone into creating a fake BBC website and story…and get the links to all the stories we covered here.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=QFLcB6grWUA

The fake BBC report presumably cited Roberts and me because our work on the Charlie Hebdo false flag had gone viral and reached more people than anyone else’s. My stories and reports tallied reads and views well into the six figures, meaning the actual audience (including reposts) was over a million – despite cyber-criminal efforts to stop it, including a multiple hacks here at VT that removed my story from circulation during the most critical period shortly after the event. Roberts’ stuff also went viral; together, we reached millions of people with the message that Charlie Hebdo was a false flag. Was the bogus BBC report a reaction to our success?

The fake BBC story went up late Sunday and stayed up just long enough to start going viral Monday morning. (That’s Sunday the 11th a.k.a. 1/11 for all you illuminati fans out there.)

Someone with access to expertise and resources spent a considerable amount of time and trouble to produce this high-grade hoax. Who would do such a thing? And why?

More