A very interesting video on 911 that cannot be debunked that I had never seen before....

[chancy]

Hello Everyone:
I have followed the 9/11 truth information for years and had never seen this video. It's impressive like alot of others. Ed Asner does a great job of narrating this video. Worth a watch if you haven't seen it before.
chancy

Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOb92R34jxo

[Dennis Leahy]

If someone asks about 9/11 (I won't shove it in people's faces because it only solidifies cognitive dissonance) this is the video I give a link to.

[Oouthere]

I think this is a video everyone can agree on, as good as they come! I do believe the cognitive dissonance is a two way mirror though.

Courtney Brown's team remote viewed the incident and it pans out nicely in the first video, haven't seen the second one. I couldn't disagree or find fault with anything he said and it was all based on known technology.

[M0JFK]

Even better is the BBC interview on the day of 911 stating building seven's collapse some 35 minutes before it actually did. Was the BBC in collusion with the terrorist to have had foreknowledge of its inpending collapse?

[Mike Gorman]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GOb92R34jxo

Just put the video up on here to save leaving the forum

[mosquito]

Posted by M0JFK (here)
Even better is the BBC interview on the day of 911 stating building seven's collapse some 35 minutes before it actually did. Was the BBC in collusion with the terrorist to have had foreknowledge of its inpending collapse?

In my opinion, NO. But .......

The BBC, due to their refusal to acknowledge what happened have made themselves co-conspitrators so they only have themselves to blame. Unfortunately though, too many people don't think it through and loudly proclaim the BBC to have had foreknowledge, when the truth is actually quite straightforward. Of course, Mr & Mrs average-Brit are unable to contemplate the BBC being anything less than perfect, so they laugh in the face of anyone who implies they could possibly have been involved in a cover up, and the Truth movement ends up looking daft. The answer is actually fairly simple .....

The reporter was a woman on the ground in New York. Had she been behind a desk in London, the "news" she gave out would have been given to her by the BBC news editor. (Anyone with insider knowledge of how this stuff works, please correct me if my assuptions are wrong). Being, as she was, on the ground, then it's probable (almost certain) that the "news" she gave out was handed to her by the local authorities, whoever thay may be. And they fed her the information too soon.

Ergo - The BBC didn't have foreknowledge at all. Their mistake, big big big mistake was in not admitting what happened. Maybe it's because they don't actually employ any real journalists, only "yes" men and women. A real journalist, working for a genuinely independent news organisation would have said ...."hang on a minute ! They told us this building had fallen down before it did ! Something here smells rather ratty."

Had they done this, they could have blown Bush/Blair's lies out of the water; saved god knows how many civilian lives; prevented (or at least forestalled) the loss of so many freedoms and dealt a hefty blow to the NWO. But they didn't. They kept their establishment mouths shut and went into to denial mode. My memory of 2001 is that the BBC, along with the rest of the trendy media, were still very much into Blair worship and would never have done anything to tarnish his self-adopted messianic image. I'm not 100% sure of how long it took to actually blow the lid off their cover up, but I think it was only a few years ago, when someone managed to get the subject brought up in court.

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by Oouthere (here)
... I do believe the cognitive dissonance is a two way mirror though. ...

That's a provocative statement, making it sound like you think those who question the "official tale" are equally in cognitive dissonance. Is that what you mean?

[Joe Sustaire]

I'm sorry Dennis, but you blew it using a phrase like "it only solidifies cognitive dissonance".
Now I've got to go dig out my dictionary....

"Is that what you mean?"
See, even you guys who talk like that to each other aren't sure what you mean.

[Rex]

Great video. In respect to Lucky Larry, there has to be someone, somewhere in this country that has the History Channel "History's Business" interview recorded (not the famous "pull it" clip that we've all seen, but the one where he flat out admits to demo-ing building 7 for safety reasons). Which AE911Truth are offering a $200 reward for (seems way too LOW, how about 2K, I'll chip in).

My co-worker found this: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3788882/...?ref_=tt_ov_pl There doesn't seem to be any easy way to contact "History Channel Fan" but I'm trying. Some of you much smarter and more resourceful than me can get it done I bet, or at least get closer. That is, if the guy hasn't been gotten to.

I saved the page just in case it mysteriously disappears just like the interview.

[mgray]

Building 7 and the lack of any aviation evidence at the Pentagon are the two smoking guns of 9/11. What happen over the sky of Shanksville, PA is subject to speculation, but these two events left me feeling I was duped.

[Oouthere]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)

Posted by Oouthere (here)
... I do believe the cognitive dissonance is a two way mirror though. ...

That's a provocative statement, making it sound like you think those who question the "official tale" are equally in cognitive dissonance. Is that what you mean?

I'm simply saying that to believe every conspiracy theory out there is just as bad as believing the official story. Physical evidence should always rule the conclusion in a physical occurrence.

[yelik]

Good video.

Everyone knows it was a criminal act by the Cabal and military industrial complex but no leader wants to be the first to stick their neck out, it might get chopped off. Rather like the ET agenda. Come on Mr Putin, you can do it if you're listening.

[aranuk]

It's nearly 14 yrs since that terrible event happened. Why has the American people not insisted there should be a proper investigation of it? If they insisted it it would expose all the ****ing corruption in that country. It still has not happened. Dear American people get the finger out and make that happen for God sake. The rest of the human race are well behind you.

Stan

[gripreaper]

Posted by aranuk (here)
It's nearly 14 yrs since that terrible event happened. Why has the American people not insisted there should be a proper investigation of it? If they insisted it it would expose all the ****ing corruption in that country. It still has not happened. Dear American people get the finger out and make that happen for God sake. The rest of the human race are well behind you.

Stan

Stan, there is a real cognitive dissonance here in America in regards to 9-11. It is almost a taboo subject, and whenever I bring it up, it is immediately dismissed and frowned upon that I even brought it up, and I think I know why.

We are taught that America is the greatest country on earth, the most loving and helpful country, and that freedom and liberty are the cornerstones of our culture. If we admit that there was corruption in the very halls of our government, that this government is tied to a globalist network or bankster illuminati, that freedom and liberty are gone and an illusion, and that our country is actually an imperialist global mercenary bully doing the bidding of a small handful of psychopathic globalists and that everything we have been taught is a lie and the whole world hates us...

Well, that is still a bit much for us to take.

[sandy]

This a very informative video about the Pentagon and links to the Trade Centre as well......... Terrifying Final Conclusion!! recently released according to the date of publishing on utube..........The Author Barbara Honnegar was a White House Policy analyst at one time as well as other key positions and is now a Whistle Blower.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JT-...ature=youtu.be

[Oouthere]

I got out of the military in 1992 after doing 10 years worth of enlistments. I had been to Germany, England, Turkey, Canada, Spain, Greece, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and probably some others I'm forgetting but no one hated the U.S. military that I ever encountered.

Not certain of that today, especially since we have a sociopathic jelly fish at the helm of the country. People keep saying that everyone hates the U.S., but I remember many a night that everyone around would sing at the top of the their lungs when "Proud to be an American" would play. That is another reason I say cognitive dissonance is a two way mirror.

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by aranuk (here)
It's nearly 14 yrs since that terrible event happened. Why has the American people not insisted there should be a proper investigation of it? If they insisted it it would expose all the ****ing corruption in that country. It still has not happened. Dear American people get the finger out and make that happen for God sake. The rest of the human race are well behind you.

Stan

Stan, It wouldn't do any good at all to have a "new investigation." It would be like the guys who murdered JFK forming a commission to see who murdered JFK. The US justice system all the way through, but definitely at the highest levels, federal judges and SCOTUS justices, are all political appointments of the Cabal.

It really will take something as big as The Reset Button Movement to take the Elite/Cabal's henchmen out of power - and then, finally, a real investigation, indictments, real prosecution, convictions, and prison terms could possibly begin.

Even worse is "double jeopardy" so if the perpetrators of 9/11 went before crooked judges (like there are now), they would not only be found innocent, they could never be prosecuted again.

[Jhonie]

Joe it is always beneficial to define your terms to be better understood.

[aranuk]

Hi Dennis, Sorry if my emotions get the better of me now and again. I feel I should read your reset button again to get me with it. I will read it again tomorrow and again the next day. But it is so ****ing frustrating. I know in my heart you know how I feel Dennis. We are on the same page brother.

Stan

[seehas]

great documentary, and wow it realy took 14 years for this to be made ... i realy waited for it, i mean that specialists put their opinion in the playing field.

i remember when i worked at the physics department of a university in switzerland i asked some of these guys about it and it was either they dont want to talk about it or they said "the official story is not explainable by physic laws"

great documentary i will recommend it to sheep friends