Posted by darthtoaster
(here)
Hi JC. Thanks for your inquiries.
To a certain type of person, like you or I, this information is exciting. But to others, it is often dreadful. The word/name Jesus carries with it many connotations. So after years of difficulty in forums and in my personal life over this topic, I've learned to tread carefully. If in some cases either now or in the future it appears that I'm being evasive, its for a reason. The last thing I or my contacts want is to alienate a person unnecessarily over what are really inconsequential disagreements in the longterm. However, we do not wish to present ourselves under false pretenses either. I am sensitive to attrocities committed in that name over the ages including inquisitions, and other atrocities and mindful that in past lives there are likely at least some here who have suffered and been victims of those atrocities. On the other hand, to many people he is the literal son of God, part of a triune Godhead and to speak of him in any other way is pure blasphemy. This is almost a lose-lose situation here.
With that said, I have no personal problem answering questions and will do my best. I am the one that brought this up after all.
Am I religious? I am not religious in any way, but I know the Bible backwards and forwards. I was raised as a Lutheran protestant complete with sermons on hellfire and damnation and once I grew to adulthood I abandoned that belief system as illogical. For a few years after my sons birth, I researched every religion I could reasonably find information about. I was convinced that God had spoken to me. I eventually became a true believing but independent Christian. I would still be to this day if my contacts had not methodically taken that belief apart, piece by piece.
In a nutshell, Yeshua (a friendly name, pronounced ē-shō), was put here, he didn't come here. He had a task. He totally rebelled against that task and his minders were a bit upset about that. They had invested in him the best DNA they had, and he came to an understanding, betrayed his task and the prophecies of a great military, consolidating leader. He totally wrecked their plans. They still haven't recovered from the damage he did. But, they did harness control of his story and turn it to their advantage, building a control religion out of it. One of several they eventually built. Now that I understand all this, I am not religious in any way.
All that said, there is not a thing wrong in any of our opinions with being a religious person. A few people have ascended from a religious context. So, atheist, agnostic, religious, spiritual ... everyone is OK with us. Our message is pretty simple - there are possibilities and potential inherent in each of us. The virtues you list from the wingmakers article are part of the learning involved in achieving that potential. I want to point out two things about Interview 5 though. The first is a link. There is some ... I repeat, some ... info here which merits thoughtful consideration.
http://wespenre.com/new-revelations-on-wingmakers.htm
The other thing I will point out is the following for your consideration. Here are the virtues you list from the Interview 5 ...
"... appreciation or gratitude, compassion, humility, forgiveness, understanding, and valor or courage."
I want to present an idea - if there is to be true, lasting peace, the only way to get there is for our societies to transform their foundational belief to only one thing - absolute, unconditional love. For any being, irrespective of action. A wrongdoer might be confined or quarantined for wrongdoing in order to protect others, but they must always be loved and genuine resources dedicated to their rehabilitation, unlike the prison systems we have now. In other words, there absolutely cannot be a global societal system which encourages division over difference, but rather embraces cultural difference as vital to the richness that is humanity. As well we have to start treating our children with respect, universally. Literally, most of our problems relating to humanity are created in individuals in childhood.
What I'm saying here is two things - one, none of us have any idea on how to achieve the aforementioned unconditional love that each person voluntarily holds dear as the highest virtue, but we do recognize that is the only way true peace occurs. Second, any philosophy which lists attributes that fall short of absolute, unconditional love cannot deliver a lasting peace either. There are other issues, in my opinion, with Interview 5 - an infinite being is a wise being, meaning - not easily fooled. What is a functional implant? Would it be better stated as a programming bias? Its a difficult interview to me, paradoxical in many ways. I understand the Sumerian connection. I would ask a thought question - if we don't have a clearly defined truth of our origins widely in circulation, is it reasonable to think that the Sumerians did? Or any society at any stage in our history?
I could be wrong. My sources are just sources, like so many other sources. But I will point out that our controllers have a tendency of putting the truth right in front of us, mixed with all kinds of stuff, to hide the truth, and of course keep us in a perpetual state of distraction. I would also propose that for a being to communicate with us from the future, in a programmed reality, that being would have to exist outside or separately from the programmed reality. The program runs on a forward scroll type thing, it has a clock, a clock speed, and so on. From outside the program, it is easy to access any place in the time line. From inside, we are stuck with the clock. We can view the past and compute the future to a reasonable degree from inside, but to interact with either of those requires not only an external viewpoint but also a method of interface. Just things to consider ...
Contact with Tom. Interestingly, I've had no further contact with Tom. I was told he died alone of a heart attack. I have no way to verify that. The tongues were coding basically, and having interacted with him recently and touching his shoulder, I'm told, allowed me to bridge a gap and allow his guardian to easily comfort him as he died. Again, I have no way to verify that. The basic premise is that a person in a low state of existence/vibration can only see or conceptualize what they have had direct contact with. In Toms case, that was me earlier that day.
The brothers are always within arms reach lol. We talk everyday. Except when I need privacy. Then they stand guard basically. I won't go into why. I have a little task to accomplish down here at some point. Not a big deal in the grand scheme of things, just something which is important to us. There are certain ones who don't want me to complete that task.
Big events on the horizon? We don't know for sure what is going to be executed or when. This is a chess game basically. What we do know is that the options that are available to malevolent ones are now severely limited. Which can be dangerous. We'll see. As for David Icke and his claims of a new frequency/illuminatory manifestation, I can say we like what we hear there
Last but not least - 2012. The purpose of our simulation was fulfilled in the fall of 2012. Externally, everything has been completed. In other words, we're no longer on a script. This is a good thing. Off script, we have survived for almost three years now. That's awesome. I think we're here indefinitely. From the outside, there are assurances that we will be maintained indefinitely. The future is truly ours to build for ourselves ...
Blessings returned friend JC
New Age and Religious Cons Aimed at Making Us Passive - An alternative view
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks