+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Y2K Computer Redux for June 30 Leap Second?

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member MorningSong's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Lombardy, Italy
    Thanked 10,449 times in 2,182 posts

    Default Y2K Computer Redux for June 30 Leap Second?

    About every 3 years, a leap second is added to our time measuring system supposedly because our old Earth's rotation is constantly slowing down a tinsy-winsy bit, and to keep today's society's system of the passage of time in sync the world over, we humans must make a tiny re-set periodically.

    I, personally, keep a side-glance on this site for this kind of info:



    I ran across this article (fear porn or not) and thought I'd share:

    Quote Will the leap second on June 30 break the internet? Experts fear added time could cause computer chaos

    On June 30, at 23:59:59 GMT, the world's clocks will add an extra second
    This is to account for discrepancy between 'Earth' time and 'atomic' time
    But experts warn it could wreak havoc to systems powering the internet
    It may cause some systems to crash while others will be half a second off

    By Ellie Zolfagharifard and Jonathan O'Callaghan for MailOnline

    Published: 17:43 GMT, 19 June 2015 | Updated: 01:52 GMT, 20 June 2015

    On June 30 at 23:59:59 GM, the world's clocks will add an extra second to the day - bringing the total number of seconds for 2015 up to 31,536,001.

    Scientists say adding this 'leap second' is crucial to compensate for the slowing of the Earth's rotation.

    But according to some computer experts, the added time could wreak havoc to systems powering the internet.

    The extra second is needed because the Earth's rotation is gradually slowing down by around two-thousandths of a second per day, and it needs to catch up with atomic time.

    Atomic time uses vibrations within atoms to measure time and is said to be the most reliable because atoms resonate at extremely consistent frequencies.

    So leap seconds are occasionally used to help 'Earth time' catch up to 'atomic time' as the former is slower by about two thousands of a second per day.

    To keep them in sync, it is necessary to occasionally jump Earth's time back - for mathematical reasons similar to adding leap years.

    The decision to do so is made every time Earth time is slower by about half a second, making it about half a second quicker instead.

    'At the time of the dinosaurs, Earth completed one rotation in about 23 hours,' says Daniel MacMillan of Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center.

    'In the year 1820, a rotation took exactly 24 hours, or 86,400 standard seconds. Since 1820, the mean solar day has increased by about 2.5 milliseconds.'

    This year will be the 26th time since 1972 that a leap second will have been added.

    When asked about keeping computer clocks synchronised, John Engates, chief technology officer at Rackspace, said: 'Time gets complicated fast.'

    This is because not everyone will add the leap second in the same way, or at same time.

    In some systems, the computer clock shows 60 seconds instead of rolling over to the next minute - or shows the 59th second twice.

    As a result, the computer sees a leap second as time going backward, causing a system error and the central processing unit (CPU) to overload.

    2012, problems arose when subsystems got confused by the time change and caused hyperactivity on certain servers.

    Many companies, including Reddit, Yelp and LinkedIn, reported crashes as their systems struggled to cope.

    This time around, the major firms say they are prepared.

    Companies such as Google add fractions of a second over the preceding year so they don't need to make a sudden jump - known as a 'leap smear'.

    'We have a clever way of handling leap seconds,' wrote Google site reliability engineers Noah Maxwell and Michael Rothwell in a blog.

    'Instead of repeating a second, we 'smear' away the extra second.'

    But this might cause its own problems. Harlan Stenn, chief maintainer of the Network Time Protocol, told Information Week he doesn't like the smear.

    'At noon on June 30, clocks of smear implementers will be off by a half second,' he said.

    It means processes based on precise timing - such as the amount of time a valve opens to add a chemical to a mix - will be off by half a second.

    'What if you're getting radiation treatment? Do you want your radiation dose to be off by a half-second or more?' said Stenn.

    However, some nations, including the US, have supported a change to get rid of leap seconds. They want to simply let the clocks run out-of-sync instead.

    Were such a decision to be made, it's unlikely we could ever go back to a leap second system and keep the clocks in sync.

    This is because the clocks would be out of sync by several minutes, or maybe hours eventually, which would be virtually impossible to add to systems without disastrous consequences.

    Without leap seconds, there would be a slip of two to three minutes by the year 2100 - and half an hour by 2700.

    Other countries, like Britain, want to keep leap seconds to preserve certain regularities - such as Greenwich Mean Time, which is the time when the sun crosses the Greenwich Meridian.

    A vote is due to take place by the Radiocommunication Assembly and the World Radiocommunication Conference later in the year to decide the leap second's fate.

    This is an interesting graph in the above article:

    Quote The discrepancies between Earth time as calculated by its rotation (UTC) and atomic time (UT1) is shown here. Atomic time can be taken to be the line at zero, while the 'slowing' Earth time (and the extra seconds added) can be seen by the spikes on the green line. A second is added when it lags by about 0.6 seconds.
    Soooo.... Will we continue adding Leap Seconds? Will there be a caos of interent site crashes? Only time will telll...hehehe.
    "Vision without action is merely a dream.
    Action without vision just passes the time.
    Vision with action can change the world." Joel Arthur Barker

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MorningSong For This Post:

    Magnus (23rd June 2015), Nasu (23rd June 2015)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts