Could this really be Planet X?

[viking]

Hi all ... Love this thread ...!!

Hey Yiola ... we will get to the bottom of this!! LOL

Hi Bill ... First of all I am not sure that your interpretation of the piccie we have been talking about is some sort of 'atmospheric refraction anomaly' some of the guys on the original thread have studied the piccie quite extensively.. time will tell...I am sure we can dig out lots more pics as time goes on...

Anyway just for starters I wondered what your interpretaion of the old sumerian clay tablets was, depicting 12 planets?? edit; Including sun and moon...

All the planets are shown in true order and size...but there is one more?? I am sure you are aware of this anyway...just wondered what your thoughts were on this?


viking

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by viking (here)
I wondered what your interpretaion of the old sumerian clay tablets was, depicting 12 planets?? edit; Including sun and moon...

All the planets are shown in true order and size...but there is one more?? I am sure you are aware of this anyway...just wondered what your thoughts were on this?

Yes, it's very interesting - it may well show that the Sumerians knew a great deal more than many conventional archaelogists give them credit for.

[Wood]

Posted by viking (here)
All the planets are shown in true order and size...but there is one more?? I am sure you are aware of this anyway...just wondered what your thoughts were on this?

I've heard about that sumerian tablet in some videos and I have not given much thought to the claim before. However, now that I look at it carefully I fail to see how the sizes are accurate.

The inner planets are way smaller than Jupiter, for example. Here is a picture that [I believe] shows the actual relative sizes:


Maybe the sizes are accurate as they are seen from the earth? That would mean the sumerians had some kind of primitive telescope but not that they were able to calculate the actual sizes meaning they didn't know the maths.

EDIT: the previous paragraph is nonsense since the earth is included in the tablet (thus they were attempting to show the actual sizes)

[viking]

Ok, lets not get pickey Wood...

The point I was trying to make was that the tablet shows 12 planets in our solar system, including the sun... also shows pluto which was only dicovered recently. So they knew about this as well!!! So anyway 12 planets!! where is the other one in our solar system????

I don't want to steer too much off topic regarding the videos presented on the first page of this thread, which incidentely I haven't watched all of them yet...so Yiola and I will start a fresh thread on this topic titled 'Planet X Myth or Reality' later on, so hopefully we can all get to the bottom of this very important topic...

Laters gators ... I was also wondering if Bill has any intention of interviewing someone in the field with knowledge of Planet X. This will help us all to either take this seriously or dismiss.

viking

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by viking (here)
I was also wondering if Bill has any intention of interviewing someone in the field with knowledge of Planet X. This will help us all to either take this seriously or dismiss.

viking

Hi there - I already have! Dr Bill Deagle (audio) here:

http://projectavalon.net/Dr_Bill_Dea...April_2010.mp3

[Operator]

(I hope this doesn't light a fire) ... I have a sincere question: if Pluto was big enough for them to be put on the tablet then why are Ceres and Eris (UB313) not shown too ?

And another pops up: If there is a brown dwarf near Jupiter ... where is it on the tablet ?

[pimpom]

Posted by Operator (here)
(I hope this doesn't light a fire) ... I have a sincere question: if Pluto was big enough for them to be put on the tablet then why are Ceres and Eris (UB313) not shown too ?

And another pops up: If there is a brown dwarf near Jupiter ... where is it on the tablet ?

Well, Pluto is more then double Ceres size, but Eris is larger then both though futher away.
But I don't think it's Pluto on the map (as Pluto and Eris belongs to distant group called Kuiper belt), its more likely to be Ceres (Although Ceres would be the 5th planet, directly after Mars in that case) or Neptunus young moon Triton.

The more important fact is that they pointed out the sun as a star, and placed it in the middle (we manage to do this a hundred years ago, they did it 4000-5500 B.C) and the shape of all planets - as we thought it was flat untill 330 B.C

(Wikipedia: Aristotle accepted the spherical shape of the earth on empirical grounds around 330 BC - the false belief that medieval Christianity believed in a flat earth has been referred to as The Myth of the Flat Earth. In 1945, it was listed by the Historical Association (of Britain) as the second of 20 in a pamphlet on common errors in history.)

[sheme]

I believe every word this man said. Worth a relisten. Thanks and blessings to you both.

http://projectavalon.net/Dr_Bill_Dea...April_2010.mp3 The best talk on this subject for sure.

When I hear a genius - silence -ears mind open. Wow! Thanks for keeping mainly quiet Hat man.

[Wantsthetruth74]

Posted by sheme (here)
I believe every word this man said. Worth a relisten. Thanks and blessings to you both.

http://projectavalon.net/Dr_Bill_Dea...April_2010.mp3 The best talk on this subject for sure.

When I hear a genius - silence -ears mind open. Wow! Thanks for keeping mainly quiet Hat man.

Hey Sheme- bad link. could you have another stab at it? Thanx : )

[Bill Ryan]

------


Fixed in all the quotes. Here it is again: http://projectavalon.net/Dr_Bill_Dea...April_2010.mp3

You may enjoy the following short extract from that conversation (though it's not about Planet X). It's hilarious -- one of the few times I really got Dr Bill laughing.

http://projectavalon.net/Dr_Bill_Dea...10_extract.mp3 (6 mins, 2.4 Mb)

[sheme]

How appropriate it's Ground hog Day! Thank you Bill, yes I enjoyed the laughter as well.

Starchild111 thanks for spotting that, and good morning to you .Hugs for strength, and peace to us all.