-
17th January 2016 00:52
Link to Post #21
Re: Wallace Thornhill: The Long Path to Understanding Gravity
I found Thornhill's subtron atomic model of gravity interesting at first, about 15 years ago, which model he borrowed from Ralph Sansbury basically. But after further thought it seemed to me that basic attractive forces are unrealistic (except for the force of love = caring) and more akin to magic. So I now favor push-gravity. I also liked Thornhill's Electric Universe theory at first, but it never seemed to bring much clarity, like how are electric currents in the universe generated. In 2012 I got a few smart guys on the Thunderbolts.info forum to discuss Electric Sun models. I invited Thornhill and other proponents of his model, like Don Scott et al, to join in the discussion, but they declined, even though it's their forum. The member who ultimately was able to come up with the clearest and most thorough model of the Electric Sun and Electric Universe, especially after 2 years or more of work, was Charles Chandler. Our discussion started at http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/p...hp?f=10&t=6124 and Charles' site now has a lot of papers he wrote on Astrophysics and Geophysics at http://qdl.scs-inc.us/2ndParty/Pages/6031.html.
Charles hasn't gotten around yet to explaining gravity or the microcosm very much, but he has a very good handle on the macrocosm, I believe. The Natural Philosophy Society has a lot of members, including scientists, who discuss gravity, antigravity, aether etc. They're at http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/.
-
12th May 2016 01:56
Link to Post #22