Dr. Joseph P. Farrell: "More mystification regarding Malaysia Air flight 370"

[WhiteLove]

As you know, the disappearance of MH 370 was very strange and the story is unfolding in an even stranger way. Joseph P. Farrell wrote an excellent article yesterday where he speculated around some new details having been published in regards to the story:

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell - MORE MYSTIFICATION REGARDING MALAYSIA ARE FLIGHT 370

[Cardillac]

I already read this posting on Dr. Farrell's website (I always try to keep up with his postings) and I even commented on it on his website with a provided link (just to confuse matters more as I stated!)- I am known as LSM on his website; if one is interested in the unexplained disappearance of flight 370 (as I greatly am) just scroll down the comments to access the link posted by LSM and then draw your own conclusions if you choose to click onto the link; this incident continues to be a true dilemma!!!

please continue to be well WhiteLove and all-

Larry

[Snoweagle]

What concerns me most is the fact the airplanes electronics and ground electronics and satellite electronics and the secret electronics allowed this flight to disappear. Especially in this region packed full of war vessels and complimentary monitoring stations around the periphery of the Indian Ocean. The US claims ownership here (everywhere).

I believe we are witnessing a soft war on Malaysia by the West.

On a related point. Vice produced a documentary called "Killer Kids" which included Islamic schools in the jungles of Malaysia training children to be fighters. The claim asserts that all weapons are "manufactured" locally by metal workers. The problem is these kids were sporting fully automatic machine guns, assault rifles and even bona fide sniper rifles. Much of which had components were plastic injected formed which requires specialist machine tools. Must be a productive jungle maybe. Or the West is financing the weapons and supplying them.

[Jantje]

Maybe it has something to do with the malaysian war crimes tribunal

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aGANr6kv0v0

[betoobig]

Let´s not forget the people who was inside:
"The disappearance of four members of a patent semiconductor traveling on Malaysia Airlines MH370 makes the famous billionaire Jacob Rothschild at the sole owner of the important patent."
read more in the link...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/so...thschild46.htm
LOve...Evol

[Cardillac]

@Jantje

yes, many in the internet have pointed out that the seat of the International Tribunal Against War Crimes is in Kuala Lumpur; unanswered question: was this flight carrying sensitive technological equipment as eluded to by @betoobig (I read several articles about this also- it's plausible; but why carry this highly sensitive stuff on a person's physical body?- there are more secure ways of doing this) OR were certain persons carrying more damning documented evidence against world leaders on their person?- again this scenario makes not much sense to me; didn't people learn from from the PAN-AM Lockerbie disaster that's it's not 'healthy' to carry highly volatile incriminating evidence in their own immediate vicinity?-

in any case flight 370 remains a dilemma; now to confuse matters worse: 'supposedly' flight 17 which was downed over the Ukraine might have been what was left of flight 370 (HUH?!)- I recently read the Dutch gov't has highly classified info they refuse to release on the demise of flight 17...

crazy world, isn't it?

I can only quote the title of a Broadway musical: "Stop the World- I Want to Get Off"

-)))

Larry

[Ba-ba-Ra]

From Joseph Farrell:
THE MALAYSIA AIR 370 JUST TOOK ANOTHER VERY STRANGE TURN

he most recent non-development that non-occurred was the Malaysian government's release of its final official report, which ran to about 400 pages, and which essentially stated what we already knew, which is next to nothing.

This was Malaysia's way of saying that the disappearance and presumed crash of the flight remains a mystery.

As one might imagine, I wouldn't be blogging again about the story today, if it had not taken yet another very very strange turn, and that turn is that France is considering reopening its investigation:

France reopens investigation into missing flight MH370 after Malaysia's 400-page final report was accused of hiding the truth

As the reader will observe, the linked article reviews some of the strange conspiracy theories out there, including, of course, the one that those pesky never-to-be-trusted-always-Byzantine-Russians and their Evil-Criminal-Super-Genius-Mastermind, Vladimir Putin, had the flight shot down. Missing from the list is the theory - articulated on one of the American lamestream corporate controlled "networks" by an American general shortly after the flight's disappearance - that the flight secretly flew across India by following closely in the wake of another civilian airliner and thus dodging the primitive radar of those primitive Indians, and landed in Iran where it was going to be used in a false flag attack. Other versions of this had Israel, and not Iran, doing the secret flight-across-India and false flag. India, of course, stated that this was nonsense and had such an event occurred their air defenses would have known about it.

So now France wants to reopen its investigation, claiming, as the article notes, that Malaysia is covering up something, and part of what France wants to investigate is the following:

The Gendarmerie of Air Transport wants to examine data from satellite operator Inmarsat which tracked the plane before it went missing in March 2014.

It intends to 'verify the veracity and especially the authenticity of all the technical data transmitted,' according to French newspaper Le Parisien. (Emphasis added)

Wait... now the satellite technical transmission data is in question? And why do the French authorities suspect that the data is questionable? This is an intriguing point, because shortly after the flight disappeared, this author maintained the "it just went poof" hypothesis, i.e., that it was the target of some exotic technology, or had fallen victim to some strange and rare natural physical anomaly like the Bermuda triangle. Then it was announced that the Rolls Royce jets on the aircraft were still transmitting telemetry data for some time after the aircraft had diverted from its course and flown back across the Malaysian peninsula to the west southwest. And more importantly, if the French suspect this data is questionable, then who altered it, and why? We're not being told at all. But at the time, when much was being made of this data, I pointed out that data can be faked or altered, and perhaps was during the transmission itself.

And, come to think of it, why is France involved at all? Granted, French were aboard the flight. Debris allegedly from the flight washed up on French or former French islands in the western Indian Ocean. So for those two reasons alone, France can claim a stake as an interested party. But that raises a significant question: why is no other country with a similar stake conducting an investigation? After all, there were significant numbers of Chinese and Americans aboard the unfortunate flight, and other than a Chinese satellite photo which was made available by China shortly after the disappearance and then quickly retracted, and stupid claims by American generals about flights through India, no Chinese or American government involvement at an official level ever took place, a suspicious circumstance in and of itself. Indeed, the article points out this very strange circumstance:

No other countries are probing the flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing that had 239 people including four French nationals on board.

That suggests that those "other countries" know or suspect they know what happened to that flight, and have agreed to keep it a secret, or possibly been threatened to do so.

Then there's this:

The report said there was insufficient information to determine if the aircraft broke up in the air or during impact with the ocean.

It's that "break up in the air" that intrigues me, for that is a very different thing from an explosion; the language is carefully chosen, and is perhaps indicative that the Malaysian government knows something, and is either not talking, or afraid to do so. What caused the potential break-up in mid-air? I'm stuck on this curious statement in the article because the Malaysian ambassador in Madagascar, it will be recalled, was responsible for collecting all the debris that was washing up in the western Indian Ocean, and getting it back to Malaysia... until, that is, he turned up dead... At the time this occurred, I thought, and I still think, that he saw something in the debris, and was silenced. And I did not, and still do not, rule out the possibility that what he saw may have been evidence that the "debris" may have been salted, and not from the flight at all, or that he saw evidence of the mechanism that brought the flight down.

So once again we have another strange twist in the story that, as yet, has no agreed-upon plot-line and narrative: no sooner than Malaysia released its report, than France says something is suspicious in the technical telemetry, and the whole mystery is reopened.

But that, let it be noted, is already a bit of progress, for this is the first time that this data has been questioned, and that raises the prospects of foul play and some hidden player with motivations we do not yet know, or of foul play in covering up either incompetence, or some very anomalous circumstance.

https://gizadeathstar.com/2018/08/th...-strange-turn/

[norman]

Posted by Cardillac (here)


. . . .but why carry this highly sensitive stuff on a person's physical body? . . .

Larry

As I understand it, it wasn't the physical chips that were on the plane but all the other patent holders ( other than Rothschild ).


If they are declared dead, he's the lucky boy.

[Carmody]

I may have mentioned it before, but the way it works on a patent, is if one is named, that named entity or entities - each individually has full rights.

Rights may be relegated and delegated via other contracts, but the patent proper does not distinguish. Any given name on the patent = full rights for that name. Eg, four names on a patent and each may use or abuse the patent in any way they desire, with no concern, legal or otherwise, that may affect any of the other assignees.