-
1st December 2010 17:58
Link to Post #101
Re: Question about WikiLeaks
Pertinent to the debate> Anti-Zionist Crusader David Duke on Wikileaks
Last edited by Angelo; 7th January 2011 at 07:30.
Reason: Clarification
-
-
3rd December 2010 23:29
Link to Post #102
Re: Question about WikiLeaks
If the Soros information is true about the Wiki funding being done by him,
it not only confirms what a shuck he is, but how easily I'm manipulated.
Grr.
¤=[Post Update]=¤
Shmuck That enough letters to correct it?
-
-
3rd December 2010 23:52
Link to Post #103
Re: Question about WikiLeaks
But couldn't it be that David Duke is being used by someone to discredit Wikileaks? Certain forces probably have enough dirt on Duke to compel him to issue a timely and controversial statement designed to undermine Wilileaks in a very calculated way - WHY THIS INFORMATION NOW? Duke is not on a lot of people's most favorite list....................for obvious reasons lest I state them explicitly. And the beauty of playing the David Duke card is the "kill two birds with one stone effect." As for George Soros providing funding support for Wikileaks, that also is a very convoluted tale that doesn't necessarily enable one to draw clear conclusions concerning Wikileaks - unless you are a person who hates George Soros for certain reasons that is. These are all dirty tricks playing out on the surface to distract and confuse people and not stuff that anyone should be considering when making decisions as to the reality of the situation in my opinion.
-
-
15th December 2010 01:41
Link to Post #104
Re: Question about WikiLeaks
Ahldenaten.. I agree with with you.. Who and why to trust who?
Terrible options.
-
-
22nd February 2011 00:45
Link to Post #105
Re: Question about WikiLeaks
Interesting... One for Avalon AGAIN!. Smart bunch you are. We SEE through the nonsense. Exellent thread. Even by OUR standards.
-
-
22nd February 2011 01:40
Link to Post #106