+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member winstonsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th November 2015
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 189 times in 45 posts

    Default 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    Here is a more technical summary of the most important errors in NIST's analyses.

    It is broken down by building, so you have an easy time keeping details separated. The table of contents are clickable links for fast navigation.

    http://www.ae911truth.org/images/art...10-19-14-3.pdf

    I was part of the team that put this together and have intimate knowledge of the first two points.

    Please ask me anything. Your knowledge is our power.

  2. The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to winstonsmith For This Post:

    A Voice from the Mountains (9th December 2015), alh02 (9th December 2015), Apulu (9th December 2015), Bill Ryan (9th December 2015), Billy (9th December 2015), Cara (10th December 2015), christian (9th December 2015), Hervé (9th December 2015), Hod8 (11th December 2015), Inaiá (11th December 2015), Ivanhoe (9th December 2015), jjjones (10th December 2015), JRS (10th December 2015), Kano (9th December 2015), KiwiElf (9th December 2015), Lancelot (9th December 2015), M-Albion-3D (12th December 2015), meeradas (9th December 2015), Mercedes (9th December 2015), moekatz (9th December 2015), mojo (9th December 2015), nomadguy (11th December 2015), ponda (9th December 2015), Sunny-side-up (9th December 2015), ThePythonicCow (9th December 2015), thunder24 (9th December 2015), Wide-Eyed (9th December 2015)

  3. Link to Post #2
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,268
    Thanks
    208,939
    Thanked 457,514 times in 32,788 posts

    Default Re: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    .
    Thank you indeed!

    (And a very warm welcome to the extremely aware community here.)

  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Cara (11th December 2015), jjjones (10th December 2015), Kano (9th December 2015), KiwiElf (9th December 2015), moekatz (9th December 2015), mojo (9th December 2015), Sunny-side-up (9th December 2015)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Avalon Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    44
    Posts
    582
    Thanks
    2,557
    Thanked 2,355 times in 491 posts

    Default Re: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    You and your technical summary are great additions to this community! I'm looking forward to digging in and starting the dialogue!

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kano For This Post:

    Cara (11th December 2015), mojo (9th December 2015)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    5,994
    Thanks
    33,959
    Thanked 39,413 times in 5,643 posts

    Default Re: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    The courts won't listen to any other narrative than what TPTB want. The supreme court declined to hear Dr Woods even under whistleblower status. What can citizens to do when the legal system abandons us?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Cara (11th December 2015)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member sirdipswitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th February 2012
    Age
    79
    Posts
    1,795
    Thanks
    1,073
    Thanked 10,166 times in 1,683 posts

    Default Re: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    When is folks gonna accept the fact that all those in control gotta do, is that which they have.. and are doing... is just "ignore", everyone and play the game They wish. The "ONLY" story they will ever accept... is the story they produced!!!

    Y'all can investigate this stuff till yer old and grey... ain't nothin gonna change.
    Love, Peace, Humor
    sirdipswitch


    " A little knowledge, is a dangerous thing... so is a lot."
    - Albert Einstein -

    "Please, Do NOT, believe a word that I say, for this is my journey not yours. Go do your own research. Listen to no-one. Find YOUR own Truth. As "I" did." "It is all just a Game, play it as you will."
    -sirdipswitch-

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to sirdipswitch For This Post:

    Cara (10th December 2015)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    24th September 2014
    Location
    Appalachia
    Posts
    2,551
    Thanks
    9,947
    Thanked 13,078 times in 2,355 posts

    Default Re: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    This really is an excellent collection of facts. I used to harp on FEMA appendix C and NIST's "calibration" for the computer models as two Achilles' heels in "official story" reports. Those two alone both totally refute NIST's final hypothesis and also provide direct evidence of things going on besides what the reports focus on.

    The pdf you just linked to is obviously a distillation of years of study and debate about this literature. This is a gem, a diamond born out of lots of heat and pressure. Thanks for posting it.

  12. Link to Post #7
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    2,450
    Thanks
    11,320
    Thanked 22,055 times in 2,419 posts

    Default Re: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    Last edited by Satori; 10th December 2015 at 03:35.

  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    A Voice from the Mountains (10th December 2015), Cara (11th December 2015), Kano (11th December 2015), ponda (10th December 2015)

  14. Link to Post #8
    Egypt Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th March 2015
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 78 times in 17 posts

    Default Re: 25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

    One of the biggest most occupied,heavily computerized office buildings in the world and not a chair,desk,file cabinet,phone,table,furniture NOTHING that was even distinguishable as to what it was,was ever really found...Fire and a natural collapse does not could not produce enough energy to produce results that we saw..Then you factor in the numerous explosions going on,video & eyewitness testimonies,government/corporation motives for going to war,etc..If it walks like a duck,talks like a duck,it's probably......you guessed it..an INSIDE JOB using explosives ..Conspiracy to commit mass murder,terrorism,fraud,you name it...

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Hod8 For This Post:

    Cara (11th December 2015)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts