+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst 1 9
Results 161 to 172 of 172

Thread: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

  1. Link to Post #161
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    219
    Thanked 416 times in 116 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Believe it or not, volcanoes hold the key to understanding how the WTC towers were demolished on 9/11.

    On our planet, pyroclastic flows occur in only two instances:

    1. During volcanic eruptions
    2. During nuclear explosions

    We can quickly rule out volcanic eruptions having occurred as each of the three towers came down.

    Take a good look at the following videos and photos to get a good grasp of what pyroclastic dust flows look like.

    Volcano pyroclastic flows
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tc0-6zVx2w

    Nuke, small yield
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jkaPHPRC1o

    WTC towers
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXV6lh9TPK0
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg4f6LGCOGU

    Volcano:
    https://ibb.co/gHCivU
    https://ibb.co/d6EtUp
    https://ibb.co/dsPDvU
    https://ibb.co/dCPk9p

    Nuke:
    https://ibb.co/j9Fgzp
    https://ibb.co/numzkU

    WTC towers:
    https://ibb.co/d8LdC9
    https://ibb.co/nwigX9

    Pyroclastic clouds are rich, dense, cauliflower-like, rapidly expanding and hot.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    avid (29th June 2019), Bill Ryan (28th June 2019), Kryztian (29th June 2019), silvanelf (14th September 2019), Soda (14th September 2019), Tintin (14th September 2019), waree (29th June 2019)

  3. Link to Post #162
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,722
    Thanks
    59,876
    Thanked 94,600 times in 15,432 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by DaveToo (here)
    Believe it or not, volcanoes hold the key to understanding how the WTC towers were demolished on 9/11.
    [...]
    Hi Dave, I moved your post to this thread and recommend you have a look at post #49.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (29th June 2019), Bill Ryan (29th June 2019), DaveToo (29th June 2019), Ken (29th June 2019), Kryztian (29th June 2019), Tintin (14th September 2019)

  5. Link to Post #163
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    219
    Thanked 416 times in 116 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by lucidity (here)
    hello Siblings,

    I thought i was familiar with all the evidence on 9/11 until is saw this.

    This video was distributed by richplanet.tv: Highly recommended.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yapQLt4DChg

    be happy

    lucidity
    Richard Hall, nice guy that he is, is a dyed-in-the-wool Dr. Wood disciple.
    And a preaching one at that!
    He goes around wherever he can giving lectures on Dr. Wood and her DEW theory.

    I went down many a rabbit hole on my 9/11 journey. I left no stone unturned.
    Heck I will admit to everyone here that for a very brief period I too was a Dr. Wood proponent
    and also a Richard Hall proponent.

    But that love affair didn't last long.

    I was quite satisfied with all the research I had done up until a couple of years ago.
    Then quite by accident I discovered Heinz Pommer, a German nuclear physicist.

    The rest as they say is nuclear history!

    I would strongly encourage those who haven't seen his lectures to check out these videos:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxC_8Kuagcw
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se5BDbEbtwU
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbwYEzrB-g0

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Baby Steps (14th September 2019), gord (14th September 2019), Intranuclear (29th June 2019), Kryztian (29th June 2019), silvanelf (14th September 2019), waree (29th June 2019)

  7. Link to Post #164
    Avalon Member gord's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th October 2015
    Location
    Where the truth hurts, but refuses to die
    Age
    57
    Posts
    179
    Thanks
    2,364
    Thanked 805 times in 167 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by DaveToo (here)
    Quote Posted by lucidity (here)
    hello Siblings,

    I thought i was familiar with all the evidence on 9/11 until is saw this.

    This video was distributed by richplanet.tv: Highly recommended.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yapQLt4DChg

    be happy

    lucidity
    Richard Hall, nice guy that he is, is a dyed-in-the-wool Dr. Wood disciple.
    And a preaching one at that!
    He goes around wherever he can giving lectures on Dr. Wood and her DEW theory.

    I went down many a rabbit hole on my 9/11 journey. I left no stone unturned.
    Heck I will admit to everyone here that for a very brief period I too was a Dr. Wood proponent
    and also a Richard Hall proponent.

    But that love affair didn't last long.

    I was quite satisfied with all the research I had done up until a couple of years ago.
    Then quite by accident I discovered Heinz Pommer, a German nuclear physicist.

    The rest as they say is nuclear history!

    I would strongly encourage those who haven't seen his lectures to check out these videos:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxC_8Kuagcw
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se5BDbEbtwU
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbwYEzrB-g0

    I tried to post those three Pommer videos on The Unz Review and the post was rejected.
    Those who must silence others for speaking the truth cannot be innocent.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gord For This Post:

    DaveToo (14th September 2019), silvanelf (14th September 2019)

  9. Link to Post #165
    Great Britain Avalon Member Baby Steps's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th August 2014
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks
    14,876
    Thanked 6,344 times in 1,253 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Thanks for sharing the Pommer videos, their description of a directed nuclear fountain, contained by the bathtub base structure of the towers and therefore directed upwards in a super heated chimney effect makes allot of sense.


    The Russian nuclear scientist who previously had suggested larger nukes that dustify the towers from the base makes less sense to me as we can see progressive destruction from the top going down..however the fact that the debri piles were so low, does suggest a bomb created cavity to accommodate.

    However the nuclear plasma chimneys, which work to soften the cores of the towers, do not account for recordings of explosions going off after the planes had hit, nor accounts of detonations in the basements leading to people emerging from there with their skin hanging off(indicating nuclear flash injury)

    It seems unlikely that each tower could have had two or more separate nuclear events, at the base, one prior to collapse and one during it
    we have subcontracted the business of healing people to Companies who profit from sickness.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Baby Steps For This Post:

    silvanelf (14th September 2019)

  11. Link to Post #166
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    23rd September 2017
    Posts
    681
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 2,361 times in 573 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by lucidity (here)
    hello Siblings,

    I thought i was familiar with all the evidence on 9/11 until is saw this.

    This video was distributed by richplanet.tv: Highly recommended.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yapQLt4DChg

    be happy

    lucidity
    This is fully explainable. It's called the Boxcutter Effect :-)

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to TomKat For This Post:

    DaveToo (14th September 2019)

  13. Link to Post #167
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    219
    Thanked 416 times in 116 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by Baby Steps (here)
    Thanks for sharing the Pommer videos, their description of a directed nuclear fountain, contained by the bathtub base structure of the towers and therefore directed upwards in a super heated chimney effect makes allot of sense.


    The Russian nuclear scientist who previously had suggested larger nukes that dustify the towers from the base makes less sense to me as we can see progressive destruction from the top going down..however the fact that the debri piles were so low, does suggest a bomb created cavity to accommodate.

    However the nuclear plasma chimneys, which work to soften the cores of the towers, do not account for recordings of explosions going off after the planes had hit, nor accounts of detonations in the basements leading to people emerging from there with their skin hanging off(indicating nuclear flash injury)

    It seems unlikely that each tower could have had two or more separate nuclear events, at the base, one prior to collapse and one during it
    That's a pretty good very brief summary of Pommer's work Baby Steps.
    He does go into detail about the points you make at the end of your post.

    He is certain (and I concur) that there were multiple devices used to bring down the towers, each serving their own important purpose.
    The primary mechanism of course being the nuclear devices beneath each of the three towers.

    In addition to those were more conventional bombs and thermite.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Baby Steps (14th September 2019), silvanelf (14th September 2019)

  15. Link to Post #168
    Great Britain Avalon Member Baby Steps's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th August 2014
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks
    14,876
    Thanked 6,344 times in 1,253 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    DaveToo

    Agree, and cannot help but wonder if the progressive collapse described by Fire department witnesses as "POP! POP! POP!"
    as successive floors were dustified were not also mini nukes.

    the alleged 17 suitcases
    we have subcontracted the business of healing people to Companies who profit from sickness.

  16. Link to Post #169
    Great Britain Avalon Member Baby Steps's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th August 2014
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks
    14,876
    Thanked 6,344 times in 1,253 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    knew too much to live
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	9
Size:	123.2 KB
ID:	41533  
    we have subcontracted the business of healing people to Companies who profit from sickness.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Baby Steps For This Post:

    DaveToo (15th September 2019)

  18. Link to Post #170
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    219
    Thanked 416 times in 116 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by Baby Steps (here)

    It seems unlikely that each tower could have had two or more separate nuclear events, at the base, one prior to collapse and one during it
    The explosions in WTC1's basement occurring prior to the plane crash were likely caused by more conventional explosives.

    However, if you have understood Pommer's latest theories from the past couple of years, he is suggesting 'slow-cooking' nuclear devices were used. That is, they were activated at a certain time and started to do their own thing. The exact time that the plasma would break through the containment at the base and be released to shoot up through the tower's interior columns was unknown.

    It's entirely possible that the explosions that occurred in the basement were unpredictable results of the slow-cooking device.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Baby Steps (15th September 2019)

  20. Link to Post #171
    Avalon Member winstonsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th November 2015
    Posts
    50
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 184 times in 43 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by Baby Steps (here)

    The exact time that the plasma would break through the containment at the base and be released to shoot up through the tower's interior columns was unknown.
    There are several very good reasons to disregard buried nukes as a demolition mechanism.

    1. In WTC1, 14 people were unharmed in a stair near the 4th floor.
    2. There is no visible evidence of destruction rising from the base.
    3. How smart can this nuke be, to know exactly how high to rise, into different levels of each tower, and REVERSE DIRECTION, to begin visibly destroying the towers from the top down.
    4. The B6 slab was undamaged. See figure 26 here http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/ (This is not an endorsement of Wood's theories, just a link to a photo she features)
    Last edited by Cara; 21st September 2019 at 13:22. Reason: Fixed quote tags

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to winstonsmith For This Post:

    Baby Steps (28th September 2019)

  22. Link to Post #172
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    219
    Thanked 416 times in 116 posts

    Default Re: The sheer volume of concrete and steel that simply vanished on 9/11

    Quote Posted by winstonsmith (here)
    Quote Posted by Baby Steps (here)

    The exact time that the plasma would break through the containment at the base and be released to shoot up through the tower's interior columns was unknown.
    There are several very good reasons to disregard buried nukes as a demolition mechanism.

    1. In WTC1, 14 people were unharmed in a stair near the 4th floor.
    2. There is no visible evidence of destruction rising from the base.
    3. How smart can this nuke be, to know exactly how high to rise, into different levels of each tower, and REVERSE DIRECTION, to begin visibly destroying the towers from the top down.
    4. The B6 slab was undamaged. See figure 26 here http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/ (This is not an endorsement of Wood's theories, just a link to a photo she features)
    Winston I don't have time at the moment to go into detail with my reply, as I'll be busy for a few weeks still.
    However it seems you haven't taken the time to check out the research of Heinz Pommer who I reference above.
    He has been meticulous in his work.
    He has covered the four points you bring up and is able to explain each of them as it fits with his nuclear theory.

    Please take the time to catch up on his research. I think it will be time well-invested.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst 1 9

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts