+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 43

Thread: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

  1. Link to Post #21
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,726 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by RunningDeer (here)
    #Scalia WAS FOUND WITH A PILLOW OVER HIS HEAD!

    Any questions?

    Quote The ranch owner, John Poindexter, tried to clarify his comments, telling "CBS This Morning" that Scalia "had a pillow over his head, not over his face as some have been saying. The pillow was against the headboard."

    http://www.wtsp.com/story/news/2016/...body/80495122/
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Althena (18th February 2016), Calz (19th February 2016), conk (18th February 2016), mojo (18th February 2016), RunningDeer (18th February 2016)

  3. Link to Post #22
    United States Avalon Member ghostrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Location
    Sand Springs Ok
    Age
    54
    Posts
    7,428
    Thanks
    9,893
    Thanked 28,598 times in 6,629 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    I believe he was assassinated ...
    Raiding the Matrix One Mind at a Time ...

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ghostrider For This Post:

    Calz (19th February 2016), conk (19th February 2016), mojo (19th February 2016), SilentFeathers (26th February 2016), TargeT (18th April 2017)

  5. Link to Post #23
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    83,945
    Thanked 69,172 times in 10,476 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by 9ofClubs (here)
    If he was murdered, at least the ravens killed a truly bad person this time. Usually it is a person trying to move something good, scalia was not a moving humanity in the right direction. In fact, he was obstructing progress on many fronts. THe supreme court is better off without him. Will obama replace him with someone better? Probably, based merely on how bad I think scalia was. Do the people here actually like his rulings?

    I dont relish his death, but neither do I mourn is loss.
    You know ... this is the 4th time I started to respond to your post.

    1st two would likely have brought the attention of the mod squad and I don't want to go there.


    Scalia believed in and fought for upholding the constitution and he was likely the only justice to be able to rise above the threats or being bought and paid for.


    If he is replaced with a left wing liberal (clearly the motive for his death) then there would be little (if anything) remaining to stand up to the globalist stampede for one world everything.


    So ... it seems clear that the *progress* you wish for and *obstruction of humanity to go in that direction* is of that ilk.


    So ... wielder of multiple clubs ... where do you prefer your chip to be inserted??? So many options with a transhuman body.


    102 posts in more than 5 and 1/2 years ... you do pick your spots there 9 ...



  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    conk (19th February 2016), KiwiElf (19th February 2016), mojo (15th May 2019), TargeT (18th April 2017)

  7. Link to Post #24
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    21st July 2010
    Age
    34
    Posts
    662
    Thanks
    309
    Thanked 3,043 times in 568 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Calz,

    I post infrequently because of responses like yours. You are attacking me for some reason and making some very big assumptions.

    He fought for the constitution did he? What about Citizens United? Would you care to cite court cases in which he rendered an opinion you agreed with? Was it the ones against gay marriage? Obergefell v Hall? This violates your rights as guaranteed in the constitution.

    Lawrence v Texas where he dissented on anti sodomy laws, really for personal freedom there. This violates your rights as guaranteed in the constitution.

    boumediene v bush where he heavily dissented against gitmo people seeking redress for being held without any due process or any other constitutionally protected rights that ALL people have, not just united states citizens.

    You mean to tell you agree with holding those poor people, or even terrorist assholes if they truly indeed are that, without due process or trial? Hold them without charging them? This violates you rights as guaranteed in the constitution.

    Or that the state can kill you in Kansas v March? You agree with the state killing its citizens? This violates your right to life which is guaranteed in the constitution.

    People generally like the constitution until it protects things they disagree with.

    The one thing you could say he did well was gun ownership rights. That is the one I can come up with in his favor.

    You think the SCOTUS is what is holding back the conspiracy? Dont make me laugh. Again, Citizens united and buckley v valeo. They are helping with the problem not stoping. Both left and right.

    Why did you accuse me of wanting a RFID chip? Where did the transhumanism come from? You are angry.

    Does SCOTUS pass TPP? or TTIP? Does SCOTUS run NATO? or the IMF or WB? News flash, Scalia was part of the ravens. He just happened to be killed by a different part of it. The world is run by many groups of gangsters and not just one. THey are working for the same thing but will from time to time kill each other for higher position in the pyramid. Scalia was in the Bush camp. And he will be replaced by someone in a different camp. But those camps are still in the same army fighting for the same thing you are actually afraid of.

    Quote Posted by amor (here)
    Elisa and nine of clubs: I think you are on the wrong forum.
    That is not what I thought when I first came here. You are right, Forums shouldnt be a play where there are differing opinions
    Last edited by Praxis; 19th February 2016 at 09:10.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Praxis For This Post:

    Calz (19th February 2016), Ewan (19th February 2016)

  9. Link to Post #25
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    83,945
    Thanked 69,172 times in 10,476 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Apology 9ofClubs.

    I sold you short.

    Thank you for responding.

    You are well versed in what is going on.


    So often in the forum members come in making wild accusations with only a few posts ... then go away.


    My bad. My trust runs short and you are correct I am very angry right now (aren't you???).


    Let's turn this around and tell me what has been obstructed and what sort of progress are you hoping for???


    Seriously ... what good can come from a stacked liberal court???
    Last edited by Calz; 19th February 2016 at 09:59.

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    conk (19th February 2016), Ewan (19th February 2016), mojo (15th May 2019), TargeT (18th April 2017)

  11. Link to Post #26
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    21st July 2010
    Age
    34
    Posts
    662
    Thanks
    309
    Thanked 3,043 times in 568 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Well met Calz!

    You bet im angry. I have been thinking about these subject for a while. I came across camelot shortly after they started and I expected change to happen so soon and yet still nothing. I became aware of how much of a facade the world is in 2004 and yet no matter how much I try to talk with people or just interact, nothing seems to change. I found you cant change people, only they can change themselves, which is also why I rarely post. TO sum up, we should have something like star trek right now, but somehow we dont. I have personally seen a craft so I am positive these things are real and there is a hidden reality. I am so tired of waiting and am not sure how to act to make the change come quicker. I just try to stay abreast of news and learn what I can, and talk to those who ask questions, something I learned you have to do not try to talk about things.


    I would like to see real freedom. Income tax, for individuals, is slavery and should be recognized as such by the court. Property tax means thats property doesnt really exist because true property can not be taxed. I would like to be allowed to do whatever I want that does not impact other people, see drugs(yes this includes heroin meth or whatever I can make stupid choices with my body). I would like corporations to not be people. I would like money not be free speech as it is not. I want religious freedom so if I have a church of one, it is still protected(think about those poor people in waco).

    I have other ideas dealing with right to life and what the implications of truly having that right means, but that is much deeper than you probably care to go.

    In essence, I want freedom.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Praxis For This Post:

    Calz (19th February 2016), Ewan (19th February 2016), fourty-two (18th April 2017), TargeT (4th January 2017)

  13. Link to Post #27
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    83,945
    Thanked 69,172 times in 10,476 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by 9ofClubs (here)
    Well met Calz!

    You bet im angry. I have been thinking about these subject for a while. I came across camelot shortly after they started and I expected change to happen so soon and yet still nothing. I became aware of how much of a facade the world is in 2004 and yet no matter how much I try to talk with people or just interact, nothing seems to change. I found you cant change people, only they can change themselves, which is also why I rarely post. TO sum up, we should have something like star trek right now, but somehow we dont. I have personally seen a craft so I am positive these things are real and there is a hidden reality. I am so tired of waiting and am not sure how to act to make the change come quicker. I just try to stay abreast of news and learn what I can, and talk to those who ask questions, something I learned you have to do not try to talk about things.


    I would like to see real freedom. Income tax, for individuals, is slavery and should be recognized as such by the court. Property tax means thats property doesnt really exist because true property can not be taxed. I would like to be allowed to do whatever I want that does not impact other people, see drugs(yes this includes heroin meth or whatever I can make stupid choices with my body). I would like corporations to not be people. I would like money not be free speech as it is not. I want religious freedom so if I have a church of one, it is still protected(think about those poor people in waco).

    I have other ideas dealing with right to life and what the implications of truly having that right means, but that is much deeper than you probably care to go.

    In essence, I want freedom.




    On board with everything you say there.

    Not sure how that fits in with Scalia ... are you suggesting he was obstructing progression to freedom?

    Quote I found you cant change people, only they can change themselves, which is also why I rarely post.
    Well ... yes that is true. Yet by people sharing their voices on a platform such as this we can offer ideas for people to ponder. Up to them to make up their own mind. If they are not aware of choices they are not empowered to do such.

    Anyway ... I have come to view things almost in a black and white perception of nationalism vs globalism.

    That is why I responded as I did and again, I am sorry if I misread your intent

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    Ewan (20th February 2016), mojo (15th May 2019)

  15. Link to Post #28
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    21st July 2010
    Age
    34
    Posts
    662
    Thanks
    309
    Thanked 3,043 times in 568 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Yes several of his rulings were anti freedom as I envision freedom.


    Consider, nationalism is the death of humanity just as much as globalism is.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Praxis For This Post:

    Calz (19th February 2016), Ewan (20th February 2016), mojo (15th May 2019)

  17. Link to Post #29
    United States Avalon Member Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th February 2014
    Posts
    422
    Thanks
    427
    Thanked 2,645 times in 385 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    Was Justice Scalia murdered? Forget “conspiracy theory.” This is real.

    By Jon Rappoport Feb15 , 2016

    Let’s jump right in with quotes from the Washington Post, 2/15, “Conspiracy theories swirl around the death of Antonin Scalia”. The Post published extraordinary statements from the Facebook page of “William O. Ritchie, former head of criminal investigations for D.C. police”:

    Quote “As a former homicide commander, I am stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia.”
    Quote “You have a Supreme Court Justice who died, not in attendance of a physician. You have a non-homicide trained US Marshal tell the justice of peace that no foul play was observed. You have a justice of the peace pronounce death while not being on the scene and without any medical training opining that the justice died of a heart attack. What medical proof exists of a myocardial Infarction? Why not a cerebral hemorrhage?”
    Quote “How can the Marshal say, without a thorough post mortem, that he was not injected with an illegal substance that would simulate a heart attack…”
    Quote “Did the US Marshal check for petechial hemorrhage in his eyes or under his lips that would have suggested suffocation? Did the US Marshal smell his breath for any unusual odor that might suggest poisoning? My gut tells me there is something fishy going on in Texas.”
    If this isn’t enough, the Post goes on:

    Quote “Scalia’s physician, Brian Monahan, is a U.S. Navy rear admiral and the attending physician for the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court. He declined to comment on Scalia’s [prior] health when reached by telephone Monday at his home in Maryland.

    “’Patient confidentiality forbids me to make any comment on the subject,’ he said.”

    “When asked whether he planned to make public the statement he’s preparing for [Texas Judge] Guevara, Monahan repeated the same statement and hung up on a reporter.”
    As long as no law-enforcement investigation of Scalia’s death is launched, the doctor is justified. Confidentiality applies, unless Scalia’s family lifts it. But if such an investigation is opened, all bets are off. Confidentiality no longer applies.

    There are reports that, after Scalia’s body was transported from the celebrity ranch in Texas, closely guarded and shielded by a bevy of marshals, it was rapidly embalmed. If so, that would apparently make toxicological tests far more difficult or impossible.

    As for a murder motive, try: upsetting the voting balance of the US Supreme Court. Try: a push to appoint a new Justice now, thus ensuring the appointee’s political persuasion, regardless of the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election. Try: attempting to shift the Court’s voting balance in upcoming cases on abortion, immigration, and Obamacare.

    Dismiss the comfortable notion that “this couldn’t happen.” JFK couldn’t have been murdered, but he was. High political figures don’t carry special immunity.

    Dismiss assurances from incompetents in Texas that Scalia died of natural causes, and dismiss the press repeating these assurances—which add up to: nothing.

    Dismiss calls for “propriety in a time of grief.”

    Dismiss whatever opinions, pro and con, circulate now about Scalia, his points of view, his decisions, his character, his life. They’re irrelevant to the facts of his death. Those facts are as clear as mud.

    Dismiss the typical accusations of “conspiracy theory.” It’s no theory when key facts are unknown and incompetents supplied the current “information.”

    In addition to what I’ve cited above, count as relevant the fact that Scalia’s federal protection had been removed while he was at the Texas ranch. We’re told Scalia didn’t want that protection. Maybe yes, maybe no. We’re also told Scalia’s family didn’t want an autopsy. Again, maybe yes, maybe no. The family has been silent. Or if not, their statements aren’t being reported.

    Consider, as potentially relevant, the report that Scalia was found with a pillow over his head.

    Consider, as relevant, that Judge Guevara, deciding without seeing the body that Scalia died from natural causes, ruled against doing an autopsy—and a counter-opinion, offered unofficially by another Texas judge, Bishop, that she would have wanted an autopsy.

    Concerning Judge Guevara, this may or may not be relevant—heavy.com reports, “Judge Cinderela Guevara: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know”:

    Quote “This isn’t the first time Guevara has been the source of controversy. In 2013, Melaney Parker Rayburn was found dead after being hit by a train in Marfa, Texas… Liz Parker, Melaney’s mom, questioned how Guevara handled the investigation of her daughter’s death, The Daily Kos reported. Melaney was hit by a Union Pacific Railroad train and, Liz [her mother] wrote, a Union Pacific representative told her that it appeared that her body had been placed on the tracks while she was unconscious. Liz asked the Justice of the Peace and the Sheriff to open the case as a homicide investigation, but they would not. Guevara, who was a Justice of the Peace at the time, did not order a rape kit or an autopsy, Liz wrote, because a doctor at the scene said the cause of death was obvious.

    “Liz later wrote a letter to the editor, published on Big Bend Now, in which she said that Guevara had asked for God to give her an answer about whether Melaney’s death was suicide. Liz wrote that Guevara told her: ‘Yes, this was a tragedy, but the true tragedy was that she died without accepting Jesus Christ as her savior.’”
    Bottom line so far: Any reasonable law-enforcement agency would immediately open an investigation into Scalia’s death. Failing to do so would rate as aiding and abetting a concealment of the truth, whatever that turns out to be.

    Jon Rappoport
    THIS.

    I wasn't a fan of Scalia, but he was CLEARLY whacked.

    We here in America are in for an "interesting" year...

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sean For This Post:

    Calz (20th February 2016), Hervé (19th February 2016), mojo (19th February 2016)

  19. Link to Post #30
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,166 times in 15,477 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Another look at Supreme Court Justice Scalia’s death

    by Jon Rappoport Jan3, 2017

    I’m taking another look because I have a new statement about a related case:

    Melaney Parker, a woman found dead on the railroad tracks in Marfa, Texas, in 2013, after a train hit her.

    The same judge who inexplicably decided Scalia needed no autopsy, after he died in Texas, in 2016, came to the same conclusion in the Melaney Parker case.

    That Texas judge is Cinderela Guevara.

    Heavy.com (Feb 2016) summarizes the questions surrounding the 2013 death of Melaney Parker and Guevara’s role:
    “Liz Parker, Melaney’s mom, questioned how Guevara handled the investigation of her daughter’s death, The Daily Kos reported. Melaney was hit by a Union Pacific Railroad train and, Liz wrote, a Union Pacific representative told her that it appeared that her body had been placed on the tracks while she was unconscious. Liz asked the Justice of the Peace and the Sheriff to open the case as a homicide investigation, but they would not. Guevara, who was a Justice of the Peace at the time, did not order a rape kit or an autopsy, Liz wrote, because a doctor at the scene said the cause of death was obvious.”

    “Liz later wrote a letter to the editor, published in Big Bend Now, in which she said that Guevara had asked for God to give her an answer [!] about whether Melaney’s death was suicide. Liz wrote that Guevara told her:
    ‘Yes, this was a tragedy, but the true tragedy was that she died without accepting Jesus Christ as her savior’.” [!!]
    “Big Bend Now also published a story about the controversial investigation. Melaney’s cousin, Aspen Parker, wrote a letter to Fox News in 2013 saying that Guevara’s cause of death ruling mentioned that Melaney had submitted a letter of resignation to her employers before her death. Aspen wrote that he called Melaney’s employers and they said that wasn’t true.”
    The death of Melaney Parker sounds like a case begging to be reopened. I now have a new statement on it.

    According to someone with knowledge of the investigation (or non-investigation), the crime scene was a mess. The day after the police initially visited it, Melaney Parker’s eyeglasses were still there. They hadn’t been picked up as evidence.

    Pieces of Parker’s flesh were there as well. The engineer of the train that hit Parker said Parker had been positioned with one arm above her head, which suggested she might have been killed somewhere else and then dragged to the railroad tracks.

    After toxicology tests were completed, Parker’s remains were cremated without her family’s permission.

    If all this is true, Judge Guevara’s decision to skip an autopsy and accept the ruling of suicide is even more suspect.

    And then three years later, when Justice Scalia dies, Guevara issues the same long-distance ruling, on the phone. No autopsy necessary.
    ________________________________________

    Here is what I originally wrote about Scalia’s death. It’s extensive. Six articles. Some of the information overlaps:

    ONE:
    “’Associate Justice Antonin Scalia was the senior member of the U. S. Supreme Court and one of the 10 most important public servants in the country. For better or worse over the course of his 29 years on the Court, he was arguably the most influential person in America’.” Eric Mink, Huffington Post, 2/17.

    We start here—from the NY Post:
    “Lethal poisoning could have left Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s body in virtually the same condition in which it was found, a top forensic pathologist told The Post on Wednesday.

    “’It would look like he’s asleep. It [poisoning] doesn’t show anything on the body,’ said Dr. Michael Baden, who spent 25 years in the city’s chief Medical Examiner’s Office.

    “Still, Baden stressed that natural causes was a plausible explanation.”
    However, the official pronouncement of natural causes carries a burden with it. The burden of some semblance of proof. In this case, there was none.

    And if you think “none” should be SOP in the case of a US Supreme Court Justice, you need to think again.

    Judge Cinderela Guevara, miles away from Scalia’s body, sitting on the phone, rendered the judgment of natural causes after talking with marshals, none of whom had forensic training; and after talking with Scalia’s doctor, who was a few thousand miles from the Texas ranch where Scalia died.

    Apparently, Scalia’s doctor told Judge Guevara that Scalia had a heart condition. Yes? And? This is proof a US Supreme Court Justice died of a heart attack?

    Guevara, like a true bumbling amateur (or was something more ominous going on here?), decided no autopsy of the body was necessary. She decided she was too busy (doing what?) to climb in her car and drive to the ranch, to oversee the situation and talk to people at the scene.

    So she said, on the phone, “Natural causes. No autopsy.”

    In the case of a US Supreme Court Justice. In the biggest moment of Judge Guevara’s professional life.

    And the Department of Justice, the FBI, the President, and all the members of US Congress immediately bought it.

    No objections. No questions. No outrage.

    Just the silence of the lambs.

    In a city where blabbermouths never stop talking, suddenly—silence.

    Paralysis.

    And thereafter: no chain of custody for bodily evidence.

    The body of a US Supreme Court Justice wasn’t put on a plane, from the mile-long airstrip at Cibolo Ranch, under supervision, and flown back immediately to Washington DC for analysis. No.

    Instead, it was driven to the Sunset Funeral Home in El Paso, 230 miles from the Ranch. It could have been driven 65 miles to the Alpine Memorial Funeral Home in Alpine, but it wasn’t.

    At the Sunset Funeral Home in El Paso, it was promptly embalmed—ruling out the possibility of a conventional autopsy. Even then, forensic pathologist Michael Baden states, toxicology tests could be done by sophisticated analysis. According to Wayne Madsen, reporting for Infowars, no bodily fluids were collected at the funeral home for later analysis.

    Roughly 10 hours after the embalming, Scalia’s body was loaded on a plane and flown to Virginia, where Scalia’s family lives.

    But “most people think Scalia died of natural causes.” That argument, for impaired minds, carries the day. Nothing more to see, nothing more to know.

    “Old man, in ill-health, heart condition. He dies. What else could it possibly be? Natural causes.”

    As reported by Eric Mink at the Huffington Post (2/17), in an excellent piece, there were 35-40 guests at the Cibolo Ranch on the weekend Scalia died. Who were they? Was this merely a quail-hunting outing? Or was it another kind of get-together?

    No word. Silence. Why haven’t any of those guests spoken to the press? Do they know something that would shed a different light on the official story? Are they afraid? Did someone at the federal level throw a blanket over them?

    Judge Cinderela Guevara spoke to a lawyer representing the Scalia family. He said the family didn’t want an autopsy. Who is he? Why hasn’t his name surfaced? Since when is a client’s lawyer’s name a secret?

    Scalia traveled to the ranch with a friend. No one is saying who the friend is. That’s also a state secret?

    Does the Cibolo Ranch have medical personnel on staff? If so, were any of them called when Scalia was discovered dead in his room?

    The official narrative is: old man, long-time public servant, dies peacefully in his sleep of natural causes. This is the thin gloss that prevents any Washington politician with clout from demanding an investigation? This quiets and paralyzes the entire federal establishment, including eight Justices of the Supreme Court?

    Cowards and lambs.

    Not an ounce of conscience among them.

    Neutered.

    And/or told to stay silent.

    In the wake of this titanic silence, the narrative is quickly and expertly shifted to the question of who will replace Scalia on the bench. That’s the certified subject of chatter. Should Obama appoint a nominee, or should nomination wait for the next President? What is the rule? The Republicans cross swords with the Democrats. Precedents are cited. The man isn’t in his grave, and the hangars-on and petty power players are arguing over his successor. It’s a B movie. Pundits prepare talking points, clean their suits, see their hair stylists, and sidle into their minutes of face time on news shows. The shows deliver filler between commercials.

    This is the wet concrete that sets over the death of a US Supreme Court Justice.

    The one man who could have swept aside all objections, and ordered an investigation, visits the flag-covered casket in the Great Hall of the Supreme Court, stands before it for 30 seconds, moves to a painted portrait of the deceased Justice, lingers there for one minute, and then goes home, to the Oval Office, to vet nominees, a herculean task that will unfortunately prevent him from attending the funeral.

    Omerta.

    TWO:
    Four days before he died, Supreme Court Justice Scalia voted to stall Obama’s plan to force drastic EPA climate-change rules on the American economy. The vote was 5-4.

    With Scalia now gone, the vote would be 4-4.

    With a new Obama Supreme Court appointee, if Obama could ram his choice through, the vote would be 5-4 in the President’s favor. Ditto, if the next President shares Obama’s position. And the climate-change agenda would roll ahead.

    We’re not talking about small climate-change rules. We’re talking about the Big Ones.
    And note: such rules could very well dovetail with the Brave New World spelled out in the upcoming TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership).

    It’s a wedge formation, a squeeze play, a pincer movement featuring new EPA climate-change regulations on one side, and new draconian possibilities embedded in the TPP.

    If Scalia was murdered, the above agenda was sufficient reason, because the climate agenda has the force to transform life on the planet.

    If Scalia’s murder were a movie, he would have been told, as a warning: “You have no idea how big this thing is; you really don’t understand the forces you’re messing with.”

    Of course, most Americans don’t believe a political murder along this line could happen in real life. They can only accept it in a movie, where it makes perfect sense. That tells you something about the schizoid nature of the public mind:

    Adrenaline-driven in front of a screen; tranquilized and programmed to be passive and accepting of recognized authority, otherwise.

    “Don’t be silly. Scalia, murdered, and murdered for that reason? It couldn’t happen. That’s so…barbaric. We’re civilized.” That opinion and $6 will get you a rainbow smoothie.

    Obama’s climate-change plan uses the EPA to act out international agreements signed at the recent Paris summit. But in order to, yes, scam these agreements into force in the US, the EPA has to stretch and bend and distort already-existing US law. And it has done so.

    However, a number of states have sued to stop the EPA, which wants to make all states cut CO2 emissions from electrical power production by 32% in the next 15 years. Aimed mainly at coal-burning plants, these regulations would create deep reductions in the overall US energy supply and output—a primary mission of the economy-wrecking Rockefeller Globalists.

    The US Supreme Court, four days before Scalia’s death, with his vote, declared a narrow 5-4 halt to the Obama plan, pending a lower-court decision on the issue. The 5-4 vote didn’t knock out the plan, but it stalled it. And if Scalia had stayed alive, his vote going forward on the Obama plan could have remained crucial.

    The pending TPP, another Globalist trade treaty, contains a section that allows endless changes and additions in the text as years pass. In other words, the passion for cutting energy production for the US, and the rest of the planet, can easily be folded into the treaty.

    The TPP also reveals a cynical attitude toward the “humanitarian goal of saving the planet from CO2 death.” Major corporations that burn coal and employ other ways of releasing CO2 can relocate to far-off lands (e.g., Vietnam) and spew CO2 to their hearts’ content, without messy environmental controls.

    In other words, the true underlying Globalist scheme, vis-à-vis climate change has nothing to do with messianic rescue: it has to do with lowering energy production.

    Driving economies further into despair. Moving more jobs out of industrialized countries.

    Creating further poverty and chaos.

    And then bringing new order in behind that—one planet, under the tight rein of one worldwide political and economic management system.

    That’s the true meaning of the climate-change agenda, notwithstanding solemn promises and heraldic pronouncements about replacing lost energy with new renewable technologies.

    This is what Justice Scalia was going up against.

    If he was murdered, there was sufficient reason.

    The FBI can do two kinds of investigations, depending on the orders of the Attorney General: heavy or lite.

    Heavy means leaving no stone unturned. It means taking control of the Scalia’s body now and doing whatever can be done with it, in its embalmed state, to determine cause of death. It means raking wackaloon Judge Guevara over the coals, along with US marshals, to find out exactly how the verdict of “natural causes” was reached. It means extensive interviews with everyone at Poindexter’s ranch. Wall to wall forensic analysis of rooms and spaces at the ranch. And so forth and so on.

    Lite means a brush-off, meant to avoid any disruption in the present scenario.

    So far, from what I see, the FBI is doing Lite. Scalia’s body should already be on an autopsy table.

    There continues to be no uproar inside the Beltway about the absurd, insane, useless declaration of death by “natural causes.”

    And there is something else going on. It’s the convenient mind-control program that says, “Mustn’t disturb the dead. Don’t interrupt the expressions of sadness at his passing. Don’t dishonor the man by raising questions about his possible murder. Give the family their privacy during this period of grief.”

    It’s the passivity of the obedient mind.

    “We need to be more accepting. He was an old man in ill-heath. He passed away. Natural causes. The great cycle of life. Be gentle. Nothing to see. Move along, slowly.”

    “Possible murder of a US Supreme Court Justice? Please, not at this time. It’s a discordant idea. Unharmonious. Let the man go gently into that good night.”

    Truth be told, this whole country has been subject to a “no-disturb” sign for a long, long time. Don’t think; agree. Don’t investigate; obey.

    The “don’t-disturb-the-dead” program is really about the whole population. The implication is: “we’re all dead already; don’t disturb us.”

    The lesson? Just because other people are mired in a hypnotic state, you aren’t obliged to pander to them. Their trance is their own.

    Whether you’re alive and awake and alert and have power is a choice. Yours.

    THREE:
    Scalia murdered? Why was his body taken all the way to El Paso?

    “Scalia’s remains were discreetly driven by van overnight to an El Paso funeral home with an escort from a procession of Texas Department of Public Safety Troopers and U.S. Marshals Service vehicles. After arriving at 3:30 a.m. on Sunday, the Sunset Funeral Home embalmed Scalia’s remains, according to Chris Lujuan, a funeral home manager. Embalming is required by Texas law before a body can be transported out of state.” USA Today, Feb.15.

    The Associated Press reports that should an autopsy be ordered, it would likely be performed by an El Paso County medical examiner at the funeral home. The El Paso County medical examiner’s office said they hadn’t received any information regarding the possibility of performing an autopsy as of 9:30 a.m. Sunday.

    Officials at the funeral home are still waiting to hear if the remains will be flown commercial or on a private plane when the body is moved, Lujan said.

    FOUR:

    Scalia at ranch with elite society; Bohemian Grove connection

    —name of traveling companion revealed—

    —FBI admits it has done no investigation into Scalia’s death—

    The Washington Post has the story: “When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died 12 days ago at a West Texas ranch, he was among high-ranking members of an exclusive fraternity for hunters called the International Order of St. Hubertus, an Austrian society that dates back to the 1600s.”

    “Cibolo Creek Ranch owner John Poindexter and C. Allen Foster, a prominent Washington lawyer who traveled to the ranch with Scalia by private plane, hold leadership positions within the Order. It is unclear what, if any, official association Scalia had with the group.”

    “The society’s U.S. chapter launched in 1966 at the famous Bohemian Club in San Francisco, which is associated with the all-male Bohemian Grove — one of the most well-known secret societies in the country.”

    The Bohemian Club isn’t just “associated” with the Grove. The Club has two locations: in the city of San Francisco and outside the city at the 2700-acre Grove.

    Interesting, to say the least, that the St. Hubertus hunting society launched itself in the US at the Club, and that members of St. Hubertus were at the Cibolo Ranch, where Scalia died.

    The Post: “Members of the worldwide, male-only [St. Hubertus] society wear dark green robes emblazoned with a large cross and the motto ‘Deum Diligite Animalia Diligentes,’ which means ‘Honoring God by honoring His creatures,’ according to the group’s website. Some hold titles, such as Grand Master, Prior and Knight Grand Officer. The Order’s name is in honor of Hubert, the patron saint of hunters and fishermen.”

    Even more interesting is this quote from the Post: “Law enforcement officials told The Post that they had no knowledge of the International Order of St. Hubertus or its connection to Poindexter and ranch guests. The officials said the FBI had declined to investigate Scalia’s death when they were told by the marshals that he died from natural causes.”

    In addition to all the strange circumstances surrounding Scalia’s death I’ve detailed so far, now we have two degrees of separation from the Bohemian Grove, where the rich and powerful gather every summer, hold bizarre rituals, and chat about carving up ownership of the world…

    And the FBI just ignores all this and accepts “death by natural causes.” No investigation.

    For further information on the Bohemian Grove, there are many sources; for example: “Occult Activities at the Elite Bohemian Grove,” by Alex Jones, at Prison Planet; Mike Hanson’s book, “Bohemian Grove: Cult of Conspiracy.” Jones and Hanson infiltrated the Grove together and filmed the secret sacrificial ceremony, “The Cremation of Care.”
    Note: Looking up Scalia’s traveling companion, C Allen Foster, on the last weekend of Scalia’s life, I notice Foster has argued at least one case before the US Supreme Court, while Scalia served as a Justice: “Johnson v DeGrandy. Represented Hispanic republicans in Florida redistricting Voting Rights Act.”
    FIVE:
    Was Scalia murdered? Forget “conspiracy theory.” This is real.

    Let’s jump right in with quotes from the Washington Post, 2/16. The Post published extraordinary statements from the Facebook page of “William O. Ritchie, former head of criminal investigations for D.C. police”:
    “As a former homicide commander, I am stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia.”

    “You have a Supreme Court Justice who died, not in attendance of a physician. You have a non-homicide trained US Marshal tell the justice of peace that no foul play was observed. You have a justice of the peace pronounce death while not being on the scene and without any medical training opining that the justice died of a heart attack. What medical proof exists of a myocardial Infarction? Why not a cerebral hemorrhage?”

    “How can the Marshal say, without a thorough post mortem, that he was not injected with an illegal substance that would simulate a heart attack…”

    “Did the US Marshal check for petechial hemorrhage in his eyes or under his lips that would have suggested suffocation? Did the US Marshal smell his breath for any unusual odor that might suggest poisoning? My gut tells me there is something fishy going on in Texas.”
    If this isn’t enough, the Post goes on:
    “Scalia’s physician, Brian Monahan, is a U.S. Navy rear admiral and the attending physician for the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court. He declined to comment on Scalia’s [prior] health when reached by telephone Monday at his home in Maryland.

    “’Patient confidentiality forbids me to make any comment on the subject,’ he said.”

    “When asked whether he planned to make public the statement he’s preparing for [Texas Judge Cinderela] Guevara, Monahan repeated the same statement and hung up on a reporter.”
    As long as no law-enforcement investigation of Scalia’s death is launched, the doctor is in the clear. Confidentiality applies, unless Scalia’s family lifts it. But if such an investigation is opened, all bets are off. Confidentiality no longer applies.

    There are reports that, after Scalia’s body was transported from the celebrity ranch in Texas, closely guarded and shielded by a bevy of marshals, it was rapidly embalmed. If so, that would apparently make toxicological tests far more difficult or impossible.

    As for a murder motive, try: upsetting the voting balance of the US Supreme Court. Try: a push to appoint a new Justice now, thus ensuring the appointee’s political persuasion, regardless of the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election. Try: attempting to shift the Court’s voting balance in upcoming cases on climate, abortion, immigration, and Obamacare.

    Dismiss the comfortable notion that “this couldn’t happen.” JFK couldn’t have been murdered, but he was. High political figures don’t carry special immunity.

    Dismiss assurances from incompetents in Texas that Scalia died of natural causes, and dismiss the press repeating these assurances—which add up to: nothing.

    Dismiss calls for “propriety in a time of grief.”

    Dismiss whatever opinions, pro and con, circulate now about Scalia, his points of view, his decisions, his character, his life. They’re irrelevant to the specific facts of his death. Those facts are as clear as mud.

    Dismiss the typical accusations of “conspiracy theory.” It’s no theory when key facts are unknown and incompetents supplied the current “information.”

    In addition to what I’ve cited above, count as relevant the fact that Scalia’s federal protection had been removed while he was at the Texas ranch. We’re told Scalia didn’t want that protection. Maybe yes, maybe no. We’re also told Scalia’s family didn’t want an autopsy. Again, maybe yes, maybe no. The family has been silent. Or if not, their statements aren’t being reported.

    Consider, as potentially relevant, the report that Scalia was found with a pillow over his head.

    Consider, as relevant, that Judge Guevara decided without seeing the body that Scalia died from natural causes, and she ruled against doing an autopsy—and a counter-opinion, offered unofficially by another Texas judge, Bishop, that she would have wanted an autopsy.

    Bottom line so far: Any reasonable law-enforcement agency would immediately open an investigation into Scalia’s death. Failing to do so would rate as aiding and abetting a concealment of the truth, whatever that turns out to be.

    SIX:
    Scalia murdered? Did Tex Judge once ask God for a ruling?

    Who is Texas Judge, Cinderela Guevara, who denied an autopsy?

    Chew on this quote for a minute [re the Melaney Parker death-on-railroad-tracks—the quote is from Melaney’s mother]:

    “[In 2013], my sister and my daughter’s paternal aunt and I went to see Cinderela Guevara several times. [This is Judge Guevara, who just ruled Scalia died of natural causes and no autopsy was necessary.] I went to see her alone two times…

    “When she was alone with me, Ms. Guevara asked about my religious beliefs several times. We spoke about the Catholic faith and on September 3, 2013, when I met with her, she told me that she had prayed to God for an answer as to whether it [Melaney’s death] was suicide or not and asked God to give her an answer in the video. She said she did not receive an answer as to that, but she did receive an answer from God. She stated to me that God told her that, yes this was a tragedy, but the true tragedy was that Melaney had died without accepting Jesus Christ as her savior.
    “This was the woman who was deciding the cause of death of my daughter. Was she willing to consider any investigation of a homicide if she believed I was being punished by God?”
    A US Supreme Court Justice dies. The circumstances are unknown. Therefore, this same Texas Judge [Guevara] rules: no autopsy is necessary. Talk about insanity—or worse.

    NY Post: “Bill Ritchie, a retired deputy chief and former head of criminal investigations for the DC police, said he was dumbstruck when he learned that no autopsy would be performed.

    “’I took a look at the report and I almost fell out of my chair,’ Ritchie told The Post from his home in Maryland.

    “’I used to be an instructor in the homicide school. Every death investigation you are handling, you consider it a homicide until the investigation proves otherwise,’ Ritchie said.”

    Who is Judge Cinderela Guevara, the Texas official who decided she didn’t need to look at Scalia’s body to rule his death was from natural causes—therefore requiring no autopsy?

    Who is this judge who shut the door on an investigation?

    Had this judge ever done anything like this before? Had she ever ruled against a homicide investigation in a case that cried out for an investigation?

    Well, there was that case of a young woman found dead on the railroad tracks in Texas in 2013 [Melaney Parker]. Was an autopsy denied there as well? Did the Judge instead pray to God for a ruling in the case?

    Daily Kos, March 28, 2014, written by Liz Parker, Melaney Parker’s mother: “Like a dead dog on the tracks: Injustice in small town Texas…The nightmare began on the morning of Thursday, August 8, 2013. My daughter, Melaney Parker cashed out of her favorite bar at 12:01 a.m. after a night of dancing and flirting with her new husband, found him and kissed him on the lips, and said love you, see you at home. Her body was lying on the tracks when struck by a Union Pacific Railroad train at 12:23 a.m.
    “After reviewing the video taken by the train, the Union Pacific Railroad claims representative told an attorney who volunteered to assist us, that she appeared to have been placed on the tracks and seemed to be unconscious or dead, not moving or flinching as the train approached….The claims representative said that he pleaded with the Justice of the Peace and the Sheriff to open this case as a homicide. They insisted it was a suicide.

    “…My sister and I and other members of our family talked to the Justice of the Peace, Cinderela Guevara…When we asked if a rape kit had been ordered, she seemed surprised. She said she had only ordered a toxicology report. We did not understand until later that she meant she had only ordered a toxicology report and not an autopsy. She later tried to say that it was Dr. Contin’s suggestion because she thought the cause of death was obvious. My sister asked her at one meeting, ‘With all due respect, Judge, how do you know she wasn’t already dead when she was hit by the train?’ Ms. Guevara said nothing to that and just stared nervously at my sister. Had the possibility never entered her mind? What was called an autopsy report, so they could insist that an autopsy had been performed, were two pages signed by Dr. Contin on the evening of August 8, 2013, stating that ‘after investigation’ it was determined that Melaney ‘intentionally placed herself on the tracks’ and the cause of death was suicide. It appears that Dr. Contin only did a superficial visual examination and never took any samples or tissues, other than from the liver (approximately 8 hours after her death on a summer night) for the toxicology report. After researching the finding, we found that samples should not be taken from the liver, especially after physical trauma, because of the possibility of contamination.

    “The Union Pacific Railroad claims representative told our attorney that if they had known an autopsy had not been ordered they would have paid for one…

    “My sister and my daughter’s paternal aunt and I went to see [Judge] Cinderela Guevara several times. I went to see her alone two times…

    “When she was alone with me, Ms. Guevara asked about my religious beliefs several times. We spoke about the Catholic faith and on September 3, 2013, when I met with her, she told me that she had prayed to God for an answer as to whether it was suicide or not and asked God to give her an answer in the video. She said she did not receive an answer as to that, but she did receive an answer from God. She stated to me that God told her that, yes this was a tragedy, but the true tragedy was that Melaney had died without accepting Jesus Christ as her savior.

    “…This was the woman who was deciding the cause of death of my daughter. Was she willing to consider any investigation of a homicide if she believed I was being punished by God?”
    But of course, there is no problem. No problem at all. Justice Scalia died of natural causes. Of course. No autopsy necessary. Judge Guevara didn’t need to see the body. Why bother?

    No need for an investigation.

    We absolutely know there is no cover-up in the case.

    The Judge has ruled.

    Politicians in Washington DC would be in an uproar if anything were wrong. But they’re silent.

    That means all is well.

    All is well…

    Sure it is.

    Case open and shut.

    Case closed.

    Two cases closed. Melaney Parker and Justice Scalia.

    Nothing to see.

    Everything is normal.

    Jon Rappoport
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (4th January 2017), Ewan (4th January 2017), Foxie Loxie (9th January 2017), mojo (15th May 2019), Satori (18th April 2017), Unicorn (4th January 2017)

  21. Link to Post #31
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,767
    Thanks
    28,001
    Thanked 50,925 times in 10,305 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Murdered! Scalia's Remains To Be Exhumed!
    David Zublick
    Quote Published on Apr 2, 2017
    The sudden and unexpected loss of the great Antonin Scalia was a blow to the American justice system that will be felt for years to come. A relatively young man, Justice Scalia was thought to be a conservative staple who would hold his seat for at least another decade. That dream came to an abrupt end when he was discovered dead of natural causes during a hunting retreat.
    Scalia, who supposedly died of a heart attack while on this hunting trip, wasn’t autopsied when he died because at the time either no foul play was suspected, or it was ignored.
    But new evidence is coming to light that may change everything we know about how this great man died...evidence which indicates Scalia was murdered. This evidence points to the possibility that the Clintons, John Podesta and Barack Obama may be involved in an effort to prevent the late justice from finding out the truth about something the Clintons did not want known. This evidence may also be related to the PizzaGate pedophile sex trafficking scandal. David Zublick brings you the latest in this special report!
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  22. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (18th April 2017), gord (18th April 2017), mojo (15th May 2019), norman (18th April 2017), Paul (18th April 2017), Satori (18th April 2017), TargeT (18th April 2017)

  23. Link to Post #32
    Avalon Member Satori's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,192
    Thanks
    4,882
    Thanked 7,734 times in 1,160 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Murdered! Scalia's Remains To Be Exhumed!
    David Zublick
    Quote Published on Apr 2, 2017
    The sudden and unexpected loss of the great Antonin Scalia was a blow to the American justice system that will be felt for years to come. A relatively young man, Justice Scalia was thought to be a conservative staple who would hold his seat for at least another decade. That dream came to an abrupt end when he was discovered dead of natural causes during a hunting retreat.
    Scalia, who supposedly died of a heart attack while on this hunting trip, wasn’t autopsied when he died because at the time either no foul play was suspected, or it was ignored.
    But new evidence is coming to light that may change everything we know about how this great man died...evidence which indicates Scalia was murdered. This evidence points to the possibility that the Clintons, John Podesta and Barack Obama may be involved in an effort to prevent the late justice from finding out the truth about something the Clintons did not want known. This evidence may also be related to the PizzaGate pedophile sex trafficking scandal. David Zublick brings you the latest in this special report!
    Undoubtedly, Scalia was murdered. Motives enough existed for those in a position to do him in and also cover their tracks.

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (18th April 2017), mojo (15th May 2019), onawah (18th April 2017), TargeT (18th April 2017)

  25. Link to Post #33
    Japan Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st March 2019
    Posts
    315
    Thanks
    218
    Thanked 609 times in 227 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.192a2cce256c

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZE2Vn3L5FA

    and many other posts.

    I have no doubt in my mind that he was killed.
    Who done it?

    Pastor Texe Marrs indicated that it was the work of some patriots because Scalia, a crypto-Jew, would tip the balance in the Supreme Court to turn the US into a dictatorial NWO

  26. Link to Post #34
    United States Avalon Member cursichella1's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    754
    Thanks
    8,749
    Thanked 3,318 times in 679 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Scalia was a conservative Supreme Court Judge who died under incredibly suspect circumstances at a lodge owned by John Poindexter in a remote part of Texas. He was surrounded by Deep State types--all of whom were members of a Bohemian Club-connected secret society--The International Order of St. Hubertus.

    Scalia was a Roman Catholic and educated by Jesuits, not the most wholesome group. Seems more likely his murder was a satanic sacrifice of sorts.

    So not surprising, he died on February 13th. From Feb. 13 to 15, the Romans celebrated the Feast of Lupercalia.

    Take a look at some of the symbolism found at the Cibolo Ranch Lodge:

    Pictures

    More HERE

    Jon Rappoport wrote several articles on Scalia's death and it's very unfortunate his blog was taken down by Wordpress. One was copied here: Silence of the lambs

    Worth your time to seek out Rappoport's other articles. There's a plethora of info out there by others on the occult aspects (even pedo claims) of this, too. It's a very deep Rabbit Hole and lots more to it than "patriots" trying to prevent a "crytpo-Jew" from turning the U.S. into a "totalitarian NWO". John Poindexter is not a "patriot" and Scalia was surrounded by Deep State NWO occult creeps at the Lodge when he died.

    There are other threads on Scalia's death here in Avalon in the Forum archives.
    cursichella1


    Qui tacet consentit

  27. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to cursichella1 For This Post:

    Didgevillage (14th May 2019), enigma3 (14th May 2019), Hervé (14th May 2019), mojo (15th May 2019), Philippe (14th May 2019), Zanshin (14th May 2019)

  28. Link to Post #35
    Avalon Member Kryztian's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2012
    Location
    New Jersey USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,438
    Thanks
    8,502
    Thanked 9,742 times in 1,386 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by Didgevillage (here)
    Scalia, a crypto-Jew, would tip the balance in the Supreme Court to turn the US into a dictatorial NWO
    I was not a fan of Antonin Scalia, but can you explain why he is in your opinion a "crypto-Jew?" How do you establish this fact? What is the difference between a regular Jew and a "crypto-Jew"?
    Last edited by Kryztian; 14th May 2019 at 21:00. Reason: grammar

  29. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kryztian For This Post:

    Didgevillage (14th May 2019), mojo (15th May 2019)

  30. Link to Post #36
    Japan Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st March 2019
    Posts
    315
    Thanks
    218
    Thanked 609 times in 227 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by Kryztian (here)
    I was not a fan of Antonin Scalia, but can you explain why he is in your opinion a "crypto-Jew?"
    I will dig into Pastor Marrs' radio broadcast archive. (Incidentally, he said he discovered that he and Jim Marrs were cousins. The warrior spirit runs in their DNA, I guess)


    Quote Posted by Kryztian (here)
    What is the difference between a regular Jew and a "crypto-Jew"?
    I can answer that. A crypto-Jew is a person who hides his Jewish identity for political reasons. In Spain they were called marranos (pigs, from Arabic unclean). You can't blame them, because in Spain they could face persecution if they didn't confess to be Catholic.

    In Japan, something similar happened. There were Christian riots in the 17th century in the western part of the country (Kyushu) after the Jesuits had converted many to their version of Christianity. The ruling Tokugawa shogunate got tired of the constant revolts and forbade Christianity wholesale, so these Christians went underground. They pretended to be good Buddhists but secretly worshiped Christian deities for some generations, until the end of the 19th century when Japan got rid of the Tokugawa dynasty and these Christian families came out.

    The Bush family was one of the oldest Jewish families in America, but they also decided to hide identity for political reasons.
    http://www.texemarrs.com/022006/geor...uble_agent.htm

    Hillary and Bill are also crypto-Jews, but they are not likely to admit it (not because of persecution but because of popularity loss).

    I have a friend in Canada, who comes from a crypto-Jewish family. I met him Israel. He said he was going to be open about his Jewish heritage and was eager to learn about Jewish religious practices.

  31. Link to Post #37
    Bhutan Avalon Member enigma3's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st July 2016
    Posts
    385
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 2,477 times in 372 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Shortly before Scalia went to Texas, Obama called him in to the White House where Obama presented a report to him (very unusual for a Supreme Court justice to be called to the White house). Speculation is that report detailed Scalia's pedo history. The Order of St Hubertus is well known in European circles as a pedo and satanic group. The first report to come out of Texas after his death indicated that a pillow was found sitting on his chest. It was reported once only and then disappeared. Within two weeks a man, long known as a procurer for children and living in Europe, and a friend of Scalia, was arrested.
    Also, after Scalia's demise, Texas law enforcement officials were not allowed on the ranch. Only Federal LEO's were allowed in. Very smelly situation.

  32. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to enigma3 For This Post:

    Didgevillage (14th May 2019), mojo (15th May 2019), Zanshin (14th May 2019)

  33. Link to Post #38
    Australia Avalon Member Zanshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th November 2013
    Age
    49
    Posts
    222
    Thanks
    3,299
    Thanked 1,022 times in 202 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Scalia's connection to Order of St. Hubertus reported by Washington Post -

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.a1227cf54c57

    SRA victim David Shurter named Scalia as one of his perpetrators -
    http://freedom-articles.toolsforfree...claims-victim/

    Fiona Barnett reported on this also -

    https://pedophilesdownunder.com/?s=j...antonin+scalia

    Where Shurter asserts that Scalia had his throat slit by a 'rent boy' he treated too roughly -
    if the cabal decided he had to go then the 'rent boy' being triggered to assassinate him MK ultra style
    doesn't seem too much of a stretch.

    Sans an autopsy, the official narrative can be crafted as necessary.

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Zanshin For This Post:

    Didgevillage (15th May 2019), mojo (15th May 2019)

  35. Link to Post #39
    Japan Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st March 2019
    Posts
    315
    Thanks
    218
    Thanked 609 times in 227 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    Quote Posted by Zanshin (here)

    Sans an autopsy, the official narrative can be crafted as necessary.
    Even with an autopsy, anything can be crafted. JFK was shot at close range, from the front. But the official narrative remains that he got shot from a building in the back, a feat no sharp shooter could replicate.

    I think Scalia's death was the first step to take back the country from the pedo/satanist/bankster cabal; the second step was the Trump nomination later in the same year; the third step was Kavanaugh; and the fourth step, indictments.

    (This explains the Dem opposition, verging on hysteria, to Kavanaugh nomination. Ginsburg is dead, but Trump is tolerating the Dem silence for now)

  36. Link to Post #40
    Avalon Member Satori's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,192
    Thanks
    4,882
    Thanked 7,734 times in 1,160 posts

    Default Re: The mystery behind Judge Scalia's death

    I guess my speculation on this subject is as good as anyone else's, so

    I suspect he was murdered by the faction of the Deep State, so called, that supported Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. She was not supposed to lose. One thing they likely considered when scheming on how to ensure her "victory", should their various plans and programs be challenged by Trump, would be to realize that the 2016 presidential election could end up being challenged and go to the US Supreme Court for the final decision on the election results--not unlike the 2000 election between Gore and Bush.

    Scalia would have likely been the deciding vote on the Trump side. With him dead that would not happen. And, with him dead, there would not be 9 Justices, the needed odd number to break a tie. There would be 8 Justices. A 4/4 split is a tie and the "winner" would retain the position as POTUS.

    That is my speculation why he was murdered. Contingency planning.

  37. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    mojo (15th May 2019), Zanshin (15th May 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts