+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 1 8 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 152

Thread: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Things That May Make You Pee Yourself

    Like most Americans, I had no clue as to the facts of our demise, having only been exposed to what I was "allowed" to know, thanks to the World's Greatest Propaganda Ministry bar none.

    Only after READING LAW for myself, did I learn the truth.

    If I told you what you will find in the law, you wouldn't believe me. Shucks, if I went back in time to 1990, and told myself, I wouldn't believe me, either. But if you do go to the courthouse law library, remember to wear knee pads and "Depends" (adult diapers) ... you may fall to your knees, weeping, or pee yourself.

    So, you’re thinking, “What fact would make one pee oneself?”
    Discovering shocking facts - many many shocking facts.
    Discovering the lies we all have been indoctrinated to believe.
    ...
    [] Governments instituted to secure rights cannot tax rights - only privileges they bestow. So what privileges did government grant that makes us liable to pay taxes to live, travel, work, buy, sell, own land and a house, enter occupations, run a business, own a car, own a gun, and so on?
    [] All land is NOT real estate. Private property and real estate are mutually exclusive.
    [] Dollar bills (paper) are not dollars (coin)
    [] Legal tender is not lawful money
    [] The public debt can never be repaid
    [] The debt, denominated in dollars (gold coin) cannot be repaid with dollar bills (debt that’s part of the national debt). A minus added to a minus is more minus.
    [] There is no law that compels one to enroll in FICA / Social Security before one can live or work in the USA.
    [] No one born in the 50 united States was born within the jurisdiction of the “United States” nor was U.S. citizenship imposed on them. (Mandatory civic duties would mean they were born “slaves”)
    [] Americans are endowed with the birthright of sovereignty, freedom and independence - and are swiftly tricked into signing it all away.
    [] Americans were tricked into leaving the republican form of government and transferring to the socialist democratic form of government.
    [] Americans were tricked into becoming servants to the servant government.
    [] Via FICA, participants diminish to paupers at law, and status criminals, guilty until proven innocent.
    [] Via FICA, Americans have become collateral on an impossible public debt, eternally enslaved to the creditors of the United States government.
    [] Via FICA, recipients will never ever vote against increasing their own benefit, no matter what it costs the nation, nor support any candidate that will diminish their bribes.
    [] A legal residence is not a legal home (domicile) but a transient abode, and residents are redefined to be synonymous with vagabonds - an excepted class - and status criminals.
    [] Every president and congress, since 1933, has been socialist / collectivist and co-conspirators in the wholesale robbery of the American people. (Even Ronny Reagan was a left winger!)
    [] Capitulation of the U.S. government to foreign usurers (international financial powers).
    [] Capitulation of religious institutions to usurers, despite all scriptures condemning usury.
    [] The Secretary of Treasury is the U.S. governor of the World Bank, IMF, and other financial institutions (usurers), and by law, shall not be paid by the U.S. government. (*Which means he doesn’t work for America - or at the least - has a conflict of interest!)
    [] Confiscation of all privately held gold money, and the criminalization of the ownership of lawful money by “free” Americans (1933 - 1975).
    [] Counterfeiting the coin of America, but only after reducing the penalty for counterfeiting in 1965 (thank you, CONGRESS!)
    [] Transformation of the American military from a force to secure American liberty to an international mercenary force to protect the socialist-usurer alliance that rules the planet.
    [] Every monument named after a socialist politician post-1933 is an insult to the founding generation and the sacrifices they made to endow their posterity with sovereignty, freedom and independence.
    [] Worst of all, Americans have been tricked into giving consent to all this, so that the servant government can remain blameless. A host of interlocking self interest groups have thus conspired together to make it easy to become corrupted and perverted. And that’s enough to fill anyone’s diaper to the max.

    And now, our only remedy is to withdraw consent, restore our status, and correct the record, where possible. After that hurdle, American nationals / American sovereigns have to endeavor to preserve the republican form and the perpetual union of 50 states, created to secure our rights. For if the union is dissolved by a civil war between socialist and usurer factions, the results will not be pleasant nor beneficial to the survivors. All this will take investigation, education and self-realization that without our consent, they cannot rule us. And by law, they have no power over us, without our consent.

    ...
    Most states (and the federal government) only publish CODE on the internet. They do not publish the STATUTES. Those are usually only available in law libraries.
    ...
    Never rely solely on the CODE. Always go back to the underlying STATUTE to verify what the nature and scope of the law is.

    What may you do after you've researched the law?
    You might decide to
    [a] leave Social Security;
    [b] cancel all interest bearing accounts and investments;
    [c] withdraw from citizenship;
    [d] acquire a domicile (private property, absolutely owned) and
    [e] restore your status as an American national / free inhabitant / non-resident / sovereign.
    There was a time when it was common knowledge that Americans were sovereign.
    .................................................. ...............
    ALIEN, n. An American sovereign in his probationary state.
    - - - - “The Devil’s Dictionary” (1906), by Ambrose Bierce
    .................................................. ...............
    (available from Gutenberg.org)

    His audience knew what an “American sovereign” was, to understand the joke.

    To this day, the courtroom resounds with the language that recognizes that the government works for the sovereign people (not the citizens). The judge asks the prosecutor, "What do the people say on this matter?"
    For the government is the servant of the sovereign people. Otherwise, the judge would ask, "What do the citizens say on this matter?"

    If you were trained to pledge allegiance to "your" sovereign government, you were trained to be a subject. You were deliberately indoctrinated to surrender your birthright of sovereignty, freedom and independence, that your ancestors fought and died to endow you with. That is a tragedy.

    We were born to be Kings and Queens, monarchs of our lives and destinies. Our enemies have perverted generations, and polluted our language so that we may not recognize our tormentors. But I hope that someday, enough Americans awaken to their lost heritage. For when that day arrives, the heavens will rock with their exultation.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  2. The Following 41 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    amor (28th March 2016), Antagenet (9th July 2016), arborealis (4th September 2019), barneythez (27th March 2016), Blacklight43 (27th March 2016), bluestflame (27th March 2016), BMJ (17th April 2016), bojancan (27th March 2016), Calz (27th March 2016), damian (27th March 2016), drneglector (29th March 2016), Eram (27th March 2016), Ewan (27th March 2016), Fanna (21st August 2016), Fiberglut (17th May 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), ghostrider (28th March 2016), gord (3rd June 2016), GrnEggsNHam (28th March 2016), guayabal (27th March 2016), Heavy Duty (27th March 2016), Houman (15th May 2016), Ivanhoe (27th March 2016), jjjones (28th March 2016), justntime2learn (16th May 2016), kirolak (30th March 2016), LivioRazlo (27th March 2016), Lost N Found (27th March 2016), marique3652 (8th April 2016), Michelle Marie (19th May 2016), mpennery (27th March 2016), penn (27th March 2016), raregem (27th March 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016), Sierra (27th March 2016), Spirithorse (27th March 2016), toppy (27th March 2016), Tyy1907 (27th March 2016), Wookie (4th April 2016), Yetti (28th March 2016)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Netherlands Avalon Member Eram's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2012
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,478
    Thanks
    65,641
    Thanked 10,991 times in 1,435 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Hi Ozmirage,

    I think it is mighty fascinating that there exists a lawful exit out of the mess that the US people are in.

    On a practical level, I do have some questions:
    • I understand that you have withdrawn from citizenship.
      How does that work out in reality? Does the government leave you alone in every way?
      How does your life differ from people who are in the citizen matrix?

    • What (in your opinion) would happen if more and more people would withdraw from citizenship? 20.000 over a time span of a month. Or one million in one day.
      How would the system react to that? (denial and brute force are the first things that come to mind here)

    Thank you.
    Last edited by Eram; 27th March 2016 at 06:57.
    hylozoic tenet: “Consciousness sleeps in the stone, dreams in the plant, awakens in the animal, and becomes self-conscious in man.”

  4. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Eram For This Post:

    arborealis (13th September 2019), Calz (27th March 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), justntime2learn (16th May 2016), kirolak (30th March 2016), marique3652 (8th April 2016), penn (27th March 2016), peterpam (18th May 2016), raregem (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016), Spirithorse (27th March 2016), StandingWave (27th March 2016), Yetti (28th March 2016)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Hi Ozmirage,

    I think it is mighty fascinating that there exists a lawful exit out of the mess that the US people are in.

    On a practical level, I do have some questions:
    • I understand that you have withdrawn from citizenship.
      How does that work out in reality? Does the government leave you alone in every way?
      How does your life differ from people who are in the citizen matrix?

    • What (in your opinion) would happen if more and more people would withdraw from citizenship? 20.000 over a time span of a month. Or one million in one day.
      How would the system react to that? (denial and brute force are the first things that come to mind here)

    Thank you.
    The servant government leaves American nationals alone, for the most part.

    In the 1993 edition of the 1992 US Code (50 titles), I found only ONE reference to American nationals.
    Title 8, USC Sec. 1502. Certificate of nationality issued by the Secretary of State for person not a naturalized citizen of the United States for use in proceedings of a foreign state.

    “ The Secretary of State is authorized to issue, in his discretion and in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by him, a certificate of nationality for any person not a naturalized citizen of the United States who presents satisfactory evidence that he is an American national and that such certificate is needed for use in judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state. Such certificate shall be solely for the use in the case for which it was issued and shall be transmitted by the Secretary of State through appropriate channels to the judicial or administrative officers of the foreign state in which it is to be used.”
    That is ALL that the Federal government will say about American nationals.
    (An American national is NOT synonymous with a U.S. national, defined in Title 8 of the U.S. code.)

    P.S.- the State department will graciously issue passports for non-citizen American nationals.

    TAXES
    "The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collection. They relate to taxpayers, and not to nontaxpayers. The latter are without their scope. No procedure is prescribed for nontaxpayers, and no attempt is made to annul any of their rights and remedies in due course of law. With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws..."
    - - - Economy Plumbing & Heating v. U.S., 470 F2d. 585 (1972)
    As the Declaration of Independence reminds us, governments are instituted to secure rights. They were never delegated power to infringe, tax or diminish those rights it was created to secure.
    "The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but, the individual's rights to live and own property are NATURAL RIGHTS for the enjoyment of which an excise [tax] cannot be imposed."
    Redfield vs Fisher, 292 P. 813, at 819.

    " The right to labor and to its protection from unlawful interference is a constitutional as well as a common-law right. Every man has a NATURAL RIGHT to the fruits of his own industry."
    48 Am Jur 2d, Section 2, p. 80
    " Any claim that this statute is a taxing statute would be immediately open to severe constitutional objections. If it could be said that the state had the POWER TO TAX A RIGHT, this would enable the state to DESTROY RIGHTS guaranteed by the constitutions through the use of oppressive taxation. The question herein, is one of the state taxing the right of travel by the ordinary modes of the day, and whether this is a legitimate object of state taxation. The views advanced herein are neither novel nor unsupported by authority. The question of the taxing power of the states has been repeatedly considered by the High Court. The right of the states to impede or embarrass the constitutional operations of the the U.S. Government or the Rights which the citizens hold under it, has been uniformly denied."
    McCulloch v. Maryland 4 Wheat 316.
    Governments instituted to secure (endowed) rights have no power to tax rights. They can tax only government privileges.

    Ask your public servant to explain exactly WHAT government privilege imposes an income tax on you.
    ‘The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and PRIVILEGES which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of the tax.’
    - - - F. Morse Hubbard, Treasury Department legislative draftsman. House Congressional Record March 27th 1943, page 2580.

    ‘When a court refers to an income tax being in the nature of an excise, it is merely stating that the tax is not on the property itself, but rather it is a fee for the PRIVILEGE of receiving gain from the property. The tax is based upon the amount of the gain, not the value of the property.’
    - - - John R. Luckey, Legislative Attorney with the Library of Congress, ‘Frequently Asked Questions Concerning The Federal Income Tax’ (C.R.S. Report for Congress 92-303A (1992)).

    ‘The terms ‘excise tax’ and ‘PRIVILEGE TAX’ are synonymous. The two are often used interchangeably.’
    - - - American Airways v. Wallace 57 F.2d 877, 880
    Nontaxpayers have rights. Taxpayers have privileges.

    CONSEQUENCES

    Assuming that 97% of Americans decide to WITHDRAW CONSENT, we can assume that the tax receipts would drop 97% (or more). Also, there would be a 97% reduction in the number of subject citizens to be governed. It's not all bad. A 97% reduction in government is better than a 100% reduction from total collapse.

    The 3% of selfless civil servants delegated power to secure rights, would be hard pressed to get into mischief.

    There are other consequences that are politically unpalatable. With the loss of "human resources" pledged as collateral on the debt, the Federal Reserve Notes (dollar bills) would cease to be legal tender, as unnumbered Americans could object to their tender. Voiding the public debt for fraud also voids government bonds and notes (dollar bills). This would have the effect of making billionaires into zero-aires overnight. As you can imagine, all socialist programs would be unfunded, including Social Security and pensions.

    Based on the amount of gold in Fort Knox (assuming it is still there), there's only about $9 per capita, when coined. Silver is not stockpiled, so we'd have only a year's mining output, which comes out around $3 per capita. Obviously "something" would have to give with respect to the money system. Based on the current GDP, we may see a 5000:1 price reduction.
    Ex: $250,000 house => $49.99 house
    (Not too far off from "MONOPOLY" prices)

    Remember, CONgress has no power to create money, nor give that power to anyone else. CONgress has the power to coin money (stamp bullion) - not create bullion. And if CONgress had the power to create money, why would it need the power to borrow money?

    If no government nor bank can create a medium of exchange, guess WHO does have the power?
    And when you figure that out, you will better understand their silence on the issue.

    As to the fear of a civil war / martial law / violent reprisal, there is not much one can do to stop rogues and predators. However, the honorable public servants obedient to the law would not be enemies of the sovereign people.
    Last edited by ozmirage; 27th March 2016 at 07:41.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  6. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    arborealis (13th September 2019), Ewan (27th March 2016), Fanna (21st August 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), Ivanhoe (27th March 2016), justntime2learn (16th May 2016), marique3652 (8th April 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016), Sierra (27th March 2016), Yetti (28th March 2016)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Skeptics may wish to argue that "REALITY" matters more than "the LAW."

    However, since most Americans have never read law - nor does CONgress, routinely enacting legislation unread - it is a common mistake to think the law is fouled up.

    It is our own ignorance that trips us up.
    . . .
    “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.”
    - - - George Washington; "Sentiments on a Peace Establishment" in a letter to Alexander Hamilton (2 May 1783); published in The Writings of George Washington (1938), edited by John C. Fitzpatrick, Vol. 26, p. 289.
    [... Every citizen ... owes a portion of his property ... and services in defense ... in the militia ... from 18 to 50 years of age... ]

    Make no mistake!
    • The Declaration says : YOU have an endowed right to life.
    • But citizens have no inalienable (endowed) right to life.
    • The Declaration says : YOU have an endowed right to natural and personal liberty.
    • But citizens have only civil and political liberty.
    • The Declaration says : YOU have an endowed right to absolutely own private property (upon which you can pursue happiness without permission of a superior).
    • But citizens have no private property, absolutely owned... a portion can be claimed by the government.

    If you've consented to be a citizen, you have NO ENDOWED RIGHTS.
    Zip. Nada. Bumpkiss. Empty Set. Nought.
    Any presumption to the contrary is an error not supported by law nor court ruling.

    The government can order you to train, fight, and die, on command.
    The government can take a portion of your property -or wages - or whatever - as it sees fit.
    All authorized by your consent to be a CITIZEN (state or U.S.).
    (The USCON complies with this, too. People have rights and powers. Citizens have privileges and immunities. And they’re mutually exclusive.)
    . . . . . . . . . .
    The Supreme Court has held, in Butler v. Perry, 240 U.S. 328 (1916), that the Thirteenth Amendment does not prohibit "enforcement of those duties which individuals owe to the state, such as services in the army, MILITIA, on the jury, etc." In Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U.S. 366 (1918), the Supreme Court ruled that the military draft was not "involuntary servitude".

    Since the militia only include male CITIZENS, and not all people (who apparently retain their rights), citizenship must be voluntary. But once one volunteers, those civic duties become mandatory.

    Now that we know it is our consent to be citizens that waives our right to life and liberty, it is futile to argue over the loss of other inconsequential rights.

    Complaining about consent already given is as useful as a volunteer on a suicide mission, blurting out "They want me to do WHAT?! - That could get me KILLED!"
    . . . . . . . . . .
    >> No inalienable (endowed) right to life <<
    >> No liberty nor private property <<
    >> BECAUSE citizens are consenting subjects! <<
    = = He who consents cannot complain - SHUT UP, sit down, and obey. = =

    Of course, you were dutifully informed of your consent, in your government approved education, right?

    OOPS.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    arborealis (13th September 2019), Ewan (27th March 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), penn (29th March 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Someone asked the question : Who is most responsible for the public debt?

    "Most responsible?"
    [] Usurers.
    Usury and compound interest are responsible for the impossible to repay public debt.

    “Next most responsible?”
    [] Government Idiocy
    ... clause 4, 14th amendment forbids challenging the validity of the public debt - even when it is obviously fraudulent.

    _Why fraudulent?_
    [] Congress has no power to create money - only coin money (stamp bullion) or borrow money.
    As of Mar 2016, the public debt is over 19 Trillion dollars - not "dollar bills."

    Pursuant to existing law, 19 Trillion dollars computes to 950 billion ounces of gold, stamped into coin.
    Problem #1 : Fort Knox allegedly holds 147.4 million ounces.
    Problem #2 : World wide supply (est) is only 5.6 billion ounces.
    So exactly how did CONGRESS borrow the 944 billion ounces of gold dollars that do not exist?
    [crickets chirping]
    ...
    So if Congress didn't borrow 950 trillion ounces of gold stamped into DOLLARS, what did it borrow? At interest?
    [crickets chirping]
    ...
    I may be missing something, but it is obvious that Congress did not borrow 950 billion ounces of gold stamped into 19 trillion dollars, and anyone claiming to be a creditor is part of the fraud. They could not have lent "dollars" (gold) to Congress.
    ...
    (Dollar bills are not dollars. They are worthless IOUs, since 1933.)
    ...
    What do you think is really going on?
    (wink, wink, nod, nod)
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    bluestflame (27th March 2016), Ewan (27th March 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), giovonni (27th March 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016), Sierra (27th March 2016)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Netherlands Avalon Member Eram's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2012
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,478
    Thanks
    65,641
    Thanked 10,991 times in 1,435 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Hmm,

    I notice that there is a gap between your writings and what I'm able to understand from it.
    It's almost like two different languages that meet.
    I'm not sure, but I'm willing to bet that this goes for the majority of the people who read this thread.

    How can this be solved?

    Is there a chance that you are willing to make an effort to choose your words in a manor that is becomes more easy to understand for people who are not used to law jargon?

    I think it would improve the chances for a fruitful dialogue.
    hylozoic tenet: “Consciousness sleeps in the stone, dreams in the plant, awakens in the animal, and becomes self-conscious in man.”

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Eram For This Post:

    Lost N Found (27th March 2016), Matisse (30th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016), StandingWave (27th March 2016)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Hmm,

    I notice that there is a gap between your writings and what I'm able to understand from it.
    It's almost like two different languages that meet.
    I'm not sure, but I'm willing to bet that this goes for the majority of the people who read this thread.

    How can this be solved?

    Is there a chance that you are willing to make an effort to choose your words in a manor that is becomes more easy to understand for people who are not used to law jargon?

    I think it would improve the chances for a fruitful dialogue.
    Unfortunately, colloquial English does not match well with certain legal terms and principles. Worse, terms are often redefined.
    Consider the confusion over "republic","constitutional republic" and "republican form of government."

    In law, one has to be excruciatingly accurate.

    I will try to make a simplified
    READER’S DIGEST OF LAW (AMERICAN)
    ...
    Law simplified into one sentence:
    "All law is for the protection of property rights, all else is policy and policy requires consent."

    ★ Government recognizes and explicitly protects private property ownership.
    ★ Government recognizes and explicitly protects natural rights, natural liberty and personal liberty from trespass.

    Declaration of Independence (1776):
    => Job #1 = secure rights (endowed by our Creator)
    => Job #2 = govern those who consent
    . . . (Caveat - consent waives job #1)
    => All Americans are created equal before the law - no one has higher status. This is also the source of the Republican form of government and the sovereignty of the American national / free inhabitant.

    PEOPLE : Have powers and are endowed with rights such as life, liberty (natural and personal), and absolute ownership of their private property. Americans are free to live, own, travel, work, and do not need permission (license) from servant government.

    CITIZENS : Granted privileges and immunities, to exercise civil and political liberties, in exchange for surrendering endowed rights by consent. As subjects, they are not free to live, own, travel, work, and do need permission (license) from their master, the government.

    GOVERNMENTS : Created by compact to secure rights - they do not have rights - they have delegated powers. They do not grant rights - they bestow privileges and immunities on those who consent to be governed.

    ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION (1777) :
    => Created a perpetual UNION of member states and their governments
    => Delegated certain powers to the United States, in Congress assembled

    USCON (1787) :
    => The United States, in Congress assembled, was reorganized into three branches, allegedly to balance power, but required the State officers to swear an oath to the supremacy of the U.S. constitution.
    => People have rights and powers (protected by government)
    => Citizens have privileges and immunities (granted by government)

    In other words, the institution of government was to secure rights, via prosecution of deliberate trespass and adjudication of accidental trespass. And govern (i.e., rule, regulate, restrict) only those who consent.
    ★ Anything more is suspect.
    ★ Anything less is unacceptable.

    Offended by the current socialist democratic benevolent totalitarian police state that your consent empowers?
    Until consent is withdrawn, no remedy exists.
    After consent is withdrawn, no remedy is needed.
    ... ... .. .. ... ... .. .. ... ... .. ..
    Note: The USCON guarantees a republican form, but the source of the republican form is the Declaration of Independence, ergo, the Declaration is incorporated into the USCON by reference, and is part of the SUPREME LAW of the LAND.

    Do not believe me - I am not infallible. Go read the law (statutes) in the public record, available at any county courthouse law library. Verify that servant government has not violated the endowed rights of the sovereign people, and limits its governance to those who gave consent... the subject citizens, who have surrendered their sacred rights in exchange for political and civil liberties.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    bojancan (27th March 2016), Eram (27th March 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), kirolak (30th March 2016), LivioRazlo (27th March 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Great Britain Avalon Member samildamach's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th March 2015
    Age
    52
    Posts
    227
    Thanks
    250
    Thanked 1,296 times in 212 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    The whole subject is fascinating a complicated and so very simple all at the same time.I highly recommend looking up straw man as a starting point with reference to your birth certificate .

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to samildamach For This Post:

    kirolak (30th March 2016), Lost N Found (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016)

  17. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Quote Posted by samildamach (here)
    The whole subject is fascinating a complicated and so very simple all at the same time.I highly recommend looking up straw man as a starting point with reference to your birth certificate .
    That's patriot mythology, debunked way back in the 1990s.

    The real basis for alleged abuse is CONSENT of the governed.

    Re-read what George Washington said about American citizens and mandatory militia duty... the obligation to train, fight, and die, on command.

    - - - -
    Articles of Confederation, VI. (1777)
    ...every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined MILITIA, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of field pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and camp equipage.

    Art. 1, Sec. 8, USCON (1789)
    Congress shall have power ... To provide for calling forth the MILITIA to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

    Title 10 USC Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes
    (a) The MILITIA of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, CITIZENS of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
    (b) The classes of the militia are
    (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
    (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

    Title 50 USC Sec. 453. Registration (Selective Service)
    (a)...it shall be the duty of every male CITIZEN of the United States, and every other male person RESIDING in the United States, who, on the day or days fixed for the first or any subsequent registration, is between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six, to present himself for and submit to registration at such time or times and place or places, and in such manner, as shall be determined by proclamation of the President and by rules and regulations prescribed hereunder.
    Another reference about citizenship and the drop in status from mandatory civic duties.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War
    “The great draft riot in New York City in July 1863 involved Irish immigrants who had been signed up as citizens to swell the vote of the city's Democratic political machine, not realizing it made them liable for the draft.”
    The Supreme Court has held, in Butler v. Perry, 240 U.S. 328 (1916), that the Thirteenth Amendment does not prohibit "enforcement of those duties which individuals owe to the state, such as services in the army, MILITIA, on the jury, etc." In Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U.S. 366 (1918), the Supreme Court ruled that the military draft was not "involuntary servitude".

    Since 1777, the MILITIA were defined as all able bodied male citizens, between 17 and 45. They were obligated to train, fight, and die, on command. That is the reason why conscription (“the draft”) is 100% constitutional.

    But citizenship MUST be voluntary, otherwise militia duty violates the Declaration of Independence, wherein all men are endowed with the right to LIFE and LIBERTY as well as the 13th amendment to the U.S. constitution.

    Once you've waived your endowed rights to life and liberty, why grouse over the loss of other rights?
    Last edited by ozmirage; 27th March 2016 at 09:39.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    Eram (27th March 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016)

  19. Link to Post #10
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    There was once a nation....

    There was once a nation, founded on the ideal of self government. Not a participatory democratic form, mind you. But that each individual governed himself - as a sovereign - master of his own domain.

    Of course, when beset by predators, it helps to cooperate and unite in mutual defense. A subset of civic minded folks offered their services to “help” secure rights - you know - prosecute deliberate trespass and adjudicate accidental trespass.

    This subset, was drawn from not more than 3 to 5% of the populace, who had successfully revolted against their former sovereign. These “public servants” stepped down in status, accepted mandatory civic duties, in exchange for political liberty (voting and holding office). Not only were they oathbound to the compact (constitution), but they were held to a higher standard of behavior. Service is a privilege, not a right, and the people, the real masters, had the right to refuse service from those they disapproved of.

    To insure that only genuine patriots served, volunteers had to register their property, pay taxes, serve in the militia between the ages of 17 and 45, and surrender their liberty and life, in defense of the country and the people. This made sense. If one is to decide on who and how the public funds are to be used to secure rights, ante up your share and your hide. Cowards need not apply.

    America’s governments were thus instituted with two delegations of power : to secure rights (endowed by our Creator) and to govern those who consent (subjects).

    Frankly, legislatures didn’t have much to do, after enacting the laws that secured rights, as in prosecute deliberate injury to person or property, and adjudicate civil cases. And with a small budget, limited taxing powers (remember, no government instituted to secure rights can tax rights), and few subjects to rule, government work was no way to get rich.

    After only two generations, those selfless “patriots” realized that they had a “raw deal,” and decided to change the percentages in their favor. They ended the stringent prerequisites for voting, and extended suffrage to any warm blooded male, regardless. This had several beneficial consequences :

    1. It reduced the odds for being called up for militia duty, as more were now bound to serve;
    2. It increased the number of consenting subjects and taxpayers, that the “democratically elected” government could govern, rule, regulate, restrict, and skin alive;
    3. It fostered partisanship, and the rise of “tax and bribe” politics; and
    4. It shifted the character of a candidate from “public servant” to “panderer.”

    Generations passed. Having erased the memory of the fall from sovereignty, that subjugation of citizenship entailed, the perverted government lured women into demanding the “right to vote.” Of course, political liberty is a government privilege, not a right, since it is dependent upon a government existing. Furthermore, the grant of suffrage was unequal, since the women were not equally obligated to serve and put their lives on the line. In other words, women kept their superior protected status, and were more than happy to grab as much corruption as they could.

    Not surprising, soon after women’s suffrage, the government embarked on several disastrous violations of liberty (i.e., “Progressivism” and government meddling) of which the major one was Prohibition - the ban on the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages.

    As stated before, the power of the government to govern those who consent, and to hold public servants to a higher standard of behavior did authorize the ban - if it was limited to “persons liable.” Of course, since the vast majority of Americans unknowingly had become “persons liable,” by their consent, no legal grounds existed to stop it.

    Remember, in the organic documents that formed the nation’s governments, men were endowed with rights and liberties, which meant they had absolute ownership of themselves, their labor, their property and the liberty (natural and personal) that came with that status. The servant government had no delegation of power to tax, ban, proscribe, prohibit, or regulate any aspect of their private livelihood or enterprise as long as no one’s rights were trespassed... EXCEPT by their consent.

    Which explains why “public education” seemed to have omitted the fact that Americans could not be “born citizens” without being “born subject slaves.” Citizens have mandatory civic duties. To be born a citizen, violates the 13th amendment, since such mandatory duties would be involuntary servitude.

    Even the imposition of national socialism, via the Federal Insurance Contribution Act / Social Security Act of 1935, was by consent. No law compels participation, nor punishes those who do not participate.

    Sadly, few Americans are cognizant of their consent in the matter. During the years of the Viet Nam unWar, many “Draft Dodgers” refused their voluntary obligation to train, fight and die, on command, part of militia duty that was law of the land since 1777. Of course, such duty was limited to citizens (volunteers) and residents (privileged transients). American nationals, domiciled within the boundaries of the U.S.A. were not so obligated, and the law does not presume to trespass upon their rights, powers, liberties, and immunities.

    As we witness the collapse of the united States of America, preyed upon by internal forces of its own creation and sufferance, one might ask : “Could things have been different?”
    I believe they could be different, and can be, too.

    The laws in harmony with the republican form are still on the books. There are still protections for inhabitants with domiciles who are not consenting subjects. There are still no mandatory duties for non-citizen / non-resident American nationals. All the abusive laws appear to be strictly limited in scope and venue to those who have given consent. Granted, most Americans are clueless and ignorant of that fact, but there is still hope.

    I am skeptical that enough minds can change before the outbreak of chaos, and am pessimistic as to the course of the conflagration. There won’t be any “winners” - just “losers.”

    Even after the smoke and dust settles, on that day after the end of the final collapse, there is hope. If Americans can rediscover the fundamental principles that founded America, in 1776, there is a chance that the republican form of government will not perish from the face of the earth.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    Eram (27th March 2016), Ewan (27th March 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Netherlands Avalon Member Eram's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2012
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,478
    Thanks
    65,641
    Thanked 10,991 times in 1,435 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Yes, I understand that the law uses certain words and that it is a slippery slope to try and translate it into a more readably substance.

    That is not really my issue.

    If we assume (for the sake of arguments) that you and others who have done the hard labor of studying the law in this respect, are correct in the notion that one can withdraw citizenship, then I'd like to discuss the scenario's that we can derive from that. I'm certain that we can discuss such scenario's in a language that we can all understand.

    In other words:
    It is one thing to find a legal way out of the system that the US citizens live by and are subjected to. It is another thing to bring this into practice as a solution for all. Then we have to start thinking about every possible bump in the road.

    Such a discussion could (and I think should) be held without constantly go back to legal, difficult to understand texts.
    hylozoic tenet: “Consciousness sleeps in the stone, dreams in the plant, awakens in the animal, and becomes self-conscious in man.”

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Eram For This Post:

    Ewan (27th March 2016), genevieve (27th March 2016), Matisse (30th March 2016), StandingWave (27th March 2016)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Yes, I understand that the law uses certain words and that it is a slippery slope to try and translate it into a more readably substance.

    That is not really my issue.

    If we assume (for the sake of arguments) that you and others who have done the hard labor of studying the law in this respect, are correct in the notion that one can withdraw citizenship, then I'd like to discuss the scenario's that we can derive from that. I'm certain that we can discuss such scenario's in a language that we can all understand.

    In other words:
    It is one thing to find a legal way out of the system that the US citizens live by and are subjected to. It is another thing to bring this into practice as a solution for all. Then we have to start thinking about every possible bump in the road.

    Such a discussion could (and I think should) be held without constantly go back to legal, difficult to understand texts.
    If I may make an analogy to "1984" - American socialists have been indoctrinated to speak and think with DOUBLE BAD terminology that interferes with comprehension.

    Translating legal speak into double bad language is not the remedy to ignorance of the law.

    Reading law is initially painful and laborious. But, in time, you gain confidence and a better understanding.

    Here’s an example of convoluted legalese:
    From the Official Code of Georgia Annotated-
    OCGA 40-2-1. As used in this chapter, the term:
    (2) "Resident" means a person who has a permanent home or abode in Georgia to which, whenever he is absent, he has the intention of returning. For the purposes of this chapter, there is a rebuttable presumption that any person who, except for infrequent, brief absences, has been present in the state for 30 or more days is a resident.
    --- This is a prime example of the art of legal word twisting.
    Note how the phrasing sounds like the definition for domicile.

    Resident = "a person" + "permanent home".

    If you quickly read the section, you might presume that it means one who is in the state 30 or more days is a resident, for motor vehicle code purposes.

    But if you dissect it, the meaning is just the opposite.
    "A person" + "permanent home" + "present for 30 or more days" = rebuttable presumption that HE IS A RESIDENT.

    In plain English, a Georgia resident is one who has a permanent home but is in the state LESS than 30 days out of a year (A transient). If one is present in the state 30 or more days out of a year, he can REBUT THE PRESUMPTION that he is a resident.

    If one is NOT a resident, but has a legal and permanent home in Georgia, is he not an inhabitant (domiciled) at his permanent home?

    And non-residents are not obligated to get permission (license).

    D'Oh!

    Here are the pertinent definitions
    "INHABITANT - One who resides actually and permanently in a given place, and has his domicile there."
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.782

    "DOMICILE - A person's legal home. That place where a man has his true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning."
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.484

    "RESIDENCE - Place where one actually lives ... Residence implies something more than physical presence and something less than domicile. The terms 'resident' and 'residence' have no precise legal meaning... [One can have many residences but only one domicile]
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.1308, 1309

    "RESIDENT - ...when used as a noun, means a dweller, habitant, or occupant; one who resides or dwells in a place for a period of more, or less duration...
    Resident has many meanings in law, largely determined by statutory context in which it is used."
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p.1309
    A "legal residence" is NOT a permanent legal home (domicile).

    Why is being an inhabitant important?
    "The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states ... shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; ...."
    [Article IV of the Articles of Confederation (1777)]
    Free inhabitants - who are not subject citizens - are recognized as having endowed rights that government was instituted to secure. They are the sovereign people.

    If you are listed in the public records as a RESIDENT, you are NOT an inhabitant. And if you are a citizen, you are a subject.
    Isn't it curious that only RESIDENTS are required or eligible to get permission (license)?

    Does government make the distinction?
    YES.
    " No inhabitant of this state shall be molested in person or property ... on account of religious opinions..."
    - - - Georgia Constitution, Article 1, Sec.1, Paragraph 4

    "... private property shall not be taken or damaged for public purposes without just and adequate compensation being first paid.'
    - - - Georgia Constitution, Article 1, Sec.3, Paragraph 1
    No inhabitant, domiciled in Georgia, who believes that participation in socialism is a violation of his religious beliefs is to be molested, nor is his private property liable to be taken without compensation first being paid.

    I think you can guess what is NOT mentioned as subject to being taxed in the Georgia constitution.

    Oh, but what about RESIDENTS?
    “ Citizens, protection of. All citizens of the United States, resident in this state, are hereby declared citizens of this state ; and it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to enact such laws as will protect them in the full enjoyment of the rights, privileges, and immunities due to such citizenship.”
    - - - Georgia Constitution, Article 1, Sec.3, Paragraph 7
    All U.S. citizens (subjects) resident in the state (not as inhabitants) are declared subject citizens of the state, as well. Isn't that SPECIAL?
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    Eram (27th March 2016), Ewan (27th March 2016), rgray222 (27th March 2016)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Netherlands Avalon Member Eram's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2012
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,478
    Thanks
    65,641
    Thanked 10,991 times in 1,435 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    I don't think that this is going to work out for me (and I imagine others as well).

    I am seriously interested in this subject and the fact that you seem to be able to live outside the system of citizenship, but if all your posts are laced with this legal jargon, then I have to accept defeat and withdraw from the thread and (for now) the whole subject.

    Last attempt.
    If you would be so kind, please answer the questions that I asked in my first post in this thread in understandable language.
    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    • I understand that you have withdrawn from citizenship.
      How does that work out in reality? Does the government leave you alone in every way?
      How does your life differ from people who are in the citizen matrix?

    • What (in your opinion) would happen if more and more people would withdraw from citizenship? 20.000 over a time span of a month. Or one million in one day.
      How would the system react to that? (denial and brute force are the first things that come to mind here)
    Last edited by Eram; 27th March 2016 at 10:46.
    hylozoic tenet: “Consciousness sleeps in the stone, dreams in the plant, awakens in the animal, and becomes self-conscious in man.”

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Eram For This Post:

    Matisse (30th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016), StandingWave (27th March 2016)

  27. Link to Post #14
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    10th April 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 179 times in 49 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    I think when there is a wish, there is a way!

    check this info :
    (How do you Lawfully regain status as a Sovereign Human Being? Understand and Use Contracts)

    http://reclaim-your-sovereignty.blog...lians-can.html

    ,,What are you? A Human Being with Infinite Potential

    As a human being, you are charged with the responsibility of living your life somewhere within the limits of the Laws of Nature. Within these limits you have absolutely infinite creative potential to learn, live and love your way through the universe to become your best self and achieve your destiny whatever that may be. You literally can achieve most anything that any other human being has ever achieved before or something completely new. You are Unique and Eternal, so DREAM BIG!

    Who are you? You are the Product of your Values, Beliefs, Actions and Contracts

    Many of us currently define ourselves by the name given to us at birth, or by our job, or by being a member of a society, or by a single achievement, or even worse… by the size of our bank account. However, as Human Beings with infinite creative potential we are so much more than these simple definitions. So do yourself a favour and take some time to thoughtfully define yourself by identifying and listing your Core Values and Beliefs. Achieving the life you’ve always dreamt of starts here.

    What is Sovereignty? Complete Responsibility for Yourself and the Consequences of Your Actions

    All human beings are Sovereign entities, however the vast majority have been deceived into giving up their rights and Sovereign Power to access Government benefits, or to honour the memory of relatives and ancestors whom fought and died for the system, or simply because the government says so. Until you re-claim your Sovereignty you are subject to the statutes and rules of the society (Commonwealth) created by the Sovereign power people submit to. ''

    and check this 2 pdf files for some more info on the topic.

    http://www.yourstrawman.com/Strawman.pdf

    https://exodus200.files.wordpress.co...3/strawman.pdf


  28. The Following User Says Thank You to Radi For This Post:

    LivioRazlo (27th March 2016)

  29. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member zen deik's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th April 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    229
    Thanks
    159
    Thanked 719 times in 195 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Sounds like the republic of Texas.....
    ONLY THE END OF THE WORLD IS THE END OF THE WORLD AND THIS AIN'T IT

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zen deik For This Post:

    bettye198 (30th May 2016), Matisse (30th March 2016)

  31. Link to Post #16
    United States Avalon Member raregem's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st November 2011
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    521
    Thanks
    8,098
    Thanked 2,239 times in 468 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Hmm,

    I notice that there is a gap between your writings and what I'm able to understand from it.
    It's almost like two different languages that meet.
    I'm not sure, but I'm willing to bet that this goes for the majority of the people who read this thread.

    How can this be solved?

    Is there a chance that you are willing to make an effort to choose your words in a manor that is becomes more easy to understand for people who are not used to law jargon?

    I think it would improve the chances for a fruitful dialogue.
    Thank you for this question.
    I was close to leaving...I still cannot wrap my brain around such wording for law. Seems convoluted to the point to truly confuse the people. Words are very strategic and trickster in legal writings. These "laws" are not even true according to the writings here. Meaning: what the average "sovereign" Joes believe as truth and protection are twisted now for control and human ownership. Not the same.
    Thanks OzMirage for such efforts, depth and scope . I do hope I can get the "Dummies" version......

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raregem For This Post:

    Eram (27th March 2016), Shannon (27th March 2016)

  33. Link to Post #17
    United States Avalon Member sirdipswitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th February 2012
    Age
    75
    Posts
    1,795
    Thanks
    1,073
    Thanked 10,143 times in 1,683 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Precisely why our founding fathers did not want lawyers to hold public office.

    They are highly adept at confusion.
    Love, Peace, Humor
    sirdipswitch


    " A little knowledge, is a dangerous thing... so is a lot."
    - Albert Einstein -

    "Please, Do NOT, believe a word that I say, for this is my journey not yours. Go do your own research. Listen to no-one. Find YOUR own Truth. As "I" did." "It is all just a Game, play it as you will."
    -sirdipswitch-

  34. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sirdipswitch For This Post:

    Eram (27th March 2016), kirolak (30th March 2016), LifeAngel (29th March 2016), raregem (28th March 2016)

  35. Link to Post #18
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    18th April 2012
    Posts
    2,364
    Thanks
    7,181
    Thanked 8,141 times in 1,888 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Ozmirage, I would like to make an observation here. I have studied all of the stuff you are posting. I have read the USC The CFR, The UCC and delved into the law libraries so deep it has made me sick. I have all of the pertinent information at my fingertips all the time and here is what I have found after years of study. NONE OF THIS CRAP IS REAL LAW, THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY REAL LAWS WRITTEN SINCE 1861. COMMON LAW WAS FOR THE PEOPLE The Constitution does not give us any rights it was not written to do that. It was written to give a government certain writes and to keep them in check. The Bill of rights was placed there for the people and to keep check on the government. Common law was brought over from England and given to the American Nationals, Actually the free inhabitants on the land of the continental states.

    So that is just a taste, Our Republic government cruised along until king Lincoln became president. In 1861 the southern states walked out of congress Sine Die and the government (true government) could not re convene. So good old Lincoln created the first corporation and made the left over congress into a board of directors. That all went along during the Civil War and afterwards the reconstruction period happened where The king came up with the 14th amendment Illegally I might add and made everyone a UNITED STATES CITIZEN. Now we all got to be employees of the Corporation. How wonderful. So all those funky not LAWs called statutes, Codes, Policies are only written for Corporate employees. Check out the Act of 1871 and the continuation of the corporation. The Bankruptcy of 1933 and so on.

    Yes there are ways to remove yourself from the corporation of the UNITED STATES INC. OR THE United States of America INC or whatever the criminals decide to call themselves/ But unless you completely stop doing commerce you will never get out. There are some things one can do and I have done some. So maybe we ought to be talking about what is real and what is not ???????????????

    Steven

  36. Link to Post #19
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Quote Posted by Lost N Found (here)
    Ozmirage, I would like to make an observation here. I have studied all of the stuff you are posting. I have read the USC The CFR, The UCC and delved into the law libraries so deep it has made me sick. I have all of the pertinent information at my fingertips all the time and here is what I have found after years of study. NONE OF THIS CRAP IS REAL LAW, THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY REAL LAWS WRITTEN SINCE 1861. COMMON LAW WAS FOR THE PEOPLE The Constitution does not give us any rights it was not written to do that. It was written to give a government certain writes and to keep them in check. The Bill of rights was placed there for the people and to keep check on the government. Common law was brought over from England and given to the American Nationals, Actually the free inhabitants on the land of the continental states.

    So that is just a taste, Our Republic government cruised along until king Lincoln became president. In 1861 the southern states walked out of congress Sine Die and the government (true government) could not re convene. So good old Lincoln created the first corporation and made the left over congress into a board of directors. That all went along during the Civil War and afterwards the reconstruction period happened where The king came up with the 14th amendment Illegally I might add and made everyone a UNITED STATES CITIZEN. Now we all got to be employees of the Corporation. How wonderful. So all those funky not LAWs called statutes, Codes, Policies are only written for Corporate employees. Check out the Act of 1871 and the continuation of the corporation. The Bankruptcy of 1933 and so on.

    Yes there are ways to remove yourself from the corporation of the UNITED STATES INC. OR THE United States of America INC or whatever the criminals decide to call themselves/ But unless you completely stop doing commerce you will never get out. There are some things one can do and I have done some. So maybe we ought to be talking about what is real and what is not ???????????????

    Steven
    I disagree.

    Please re-read the quote from George Washington, written prior to the USCON.

    If you do not perceive that a citizen has NO endowed rights, while American people are sovereigns with endowed rights, you will not understand.

    The mythologists blame everything and everyone else but CONSENT of the GOVERNED.

    The "State Citizens" made the same mistake.

    [American] People have endowed rights and are sovereigns.
    [American] Citizens have government privileges and are subjects.

    That's the LAW OF THE LAND.

    Non Taurus Cacas.

    (P.S. - a "republic" is NOT synonymous with a "republican form of government.")
    Last edited by ozmirage; 27th March 2016 at 19:10.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  37. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: Americans Squandered Their Birthright of Sovereignty

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Last attempt.
    If you would be so kind, please answer the questions that I asked in my first post in this thread in understandable language.
    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    • I understand that you have withdrawn from citizenship.
      How does that work out in reality? Does the government leave you alone in every way?
      How does your life differ from people who are in the citizen matrix?

    • What (in your opinion) would happen if more and more people would withdraw from citizenship? 20.000 over a time span of a month. Or one million in one day.
      How would the system react to that? (denial and brute force are the first things that come to mind here)
    If I may reformat the questions - - -
    How does not being a subject of government differ from being a subject of government?
    _ My endowed rights are secure

    Does the government trespass upon your rights and liberties?
    _ No

    How is life different?
    _ Not a slave

    If Americans withdraw consent, in large enough numbers, what happens to "the system"?
    _ It collapses
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    amor (28th March 2016)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 1 8 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts