Put Hillary Clinton in prison already

[Maia Gabrial]

This was by James Gilliland's ECETI newsletter today. For those of you who think Hillary Clinton should be next president, you might want to reconsider. It's more like she should be in prison. Here one reason why:

I am not taking sides or getting into politics just thought this was interesting news. Not to mention countless shenanigans in the past. To vote means you agree with the system, the system is beyond repair.

Subject: United States Code Title 18. Section 2071

Word for word from the Cornell Law Library !!!

Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton's private email server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding any federal office.

Such as, say, President of the United States.

"If you do this or that bad thing, you've essentially disqualified yourself as being the leader of the free world," said Mukasey, referring to the illegal server and the illegal handling of classified materials.

Mukasey specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here's what it says:
“(a)
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b)
Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

Shouldn't voters know that? The media won't tell them. So it's up to us. Can you help hold Hillary accountable? Pass this on, please.

18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 101 - RECORDS AND REPORTS
Sec. 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov
§2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, §552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§234, 235 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§128, 129, 35 Stat. 1111, 1112).
Section consolidates sections 234 and 235 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Reference in subsection (a) to intent to steal was omitted as covered by section 641 of this title.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $2,000” in subsecs. (a) and (b).
1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–510 inserted at end “As used in this subsection, the term ‘office’ does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Section 552(b) of Pub. L. 101–510 provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall be effective as of January 1, 1989.”

She violated law. And this is just one of her crimes....

[Calz]

[Calz]

She violates "law" (what a joke) at will and always has ...

(time grows short for having the free speech to say such things ... use it or lose it)

______________


Clinton Violates State Law By Electioneering Near Polling Station AGAIN

Video shows Hillary greeting voters outside precinct

Paul Joseph Watson - April 20, 2016


Hillary Clinton once again brazenly violated New York State election laws by campaigning within 100 feet of a polling place.

A Reuters video (unembeddable but check it out here) shows Hillary and Bill Clinton greeting voters outside their polling precinct and posing for photos inside the building.

The law clearly states that candidates cannot engage in electioneering or display any political signs in the vicinity of a polling station.


http://www.infowars.com/clinton-viol...station-again/

[Calz]

Do I *really* need to post this yet again???

She wins ... we lose ... take your chip ... how bout that transhuman body???

Globalist agenda full speed ahead.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SAzIahY2Rps

[observer]

Here's an image that everyone can use to make a tee shirt, or bumper sticker from:

[ceetee9]

Clinton supporters should download and read the Trance Formation of America PDF as well--particularly chapter 14.

[KiwiElf]

And she has a questionable judge sticking up for her and vetoing any attempts at arrest

[Calz]

The gloves have come off.

Globalists are playing their end game without regard to who else thinks what.

Soros funded movement of migrants into the EU ... wake up ... ooops ... too late.

amerika is heading there with radicals flown and bused in ...


We the world populace ... have been punk'd big time ... even though "they" have openly broadcast what "they" are doing for many many years.


Are we stupid or what???


Can anyone really imagine and stomach watching Hitlery presidential press???

[raregem]

Ceetee-

Thanks for the pdf "Transformation of America". I have wanted access to this book for 15 years. Finally. Thank you, thank you.
I have read Bryce Taylors', "Thanks for the Memories". Just that Transformation of America seemed to be talked about much more often.

[conk]

They have gotten away with so much for so long, they are getting a little bit too confident. More and more blatant, in our face antics that may awaken more of us. She can't claim to be ignorant, as someone in her position should know exactly what is expected of them in positions of authority and extreme responsibility. As a former contracting officer and fiduciary agent of the federal government I had to sign letters of intent to always act with a proud sense of integrity and humility. Officials at her level most definitely are bound by those same standards. She certainly understands what her role, function, and expectations are.

[Deega]

Blues song for Hillary.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MjdPx8cJ27Y

[Calz]

Problem being the globalists have bought and paid for ... umm ... everyone ... everywhere.

Right???

[shaberon]

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
And she has a questionable judge sticking up for her and vetoing any attempts at arrest

I would support a "Prosecution Party"--a candidate whose advisors go around compiling a massive list of charges against politicians and corporate officers. It could be their whole platform and occupy their entire term of office. I am afraid the issue is too big for munchkins to tackle it as a whole, and picking off the offenders one by one just lets them refill their ranks with fresh blood.

The amount of justice prevented by such judges is incalculable.

[Kryztian]

Reading the code above (Title 18. Section 2071) I am not sure this does not apply to Hillary Clinton and her actions in the U.S. State Department. The legal language seems to be directed at evidence taken from court clerks and other judicial officers. It is basically about tampering with evidence in a criminal case. The information she stole came from the Executive Branch of Government (State Department, Military, etc) and not from the courts (Supreme, Judiciary Dept., etc.)

Sure, what she did is criminal but I don't think this particular code is going to apply.

Andrew Napolitano has been following her case closely for several months and has done an excellent job of explaining the legal aspects of the FBI investigation against her. Here is the latest:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4nLfmCV0_uE

[ceetee9]

Posted by conk (here)
They have gotten away with so much for so long, they are getting a little bit too confident.

Yep, Conk, and why shouldn't they be? Still the majority of Americans would rather just pacify themselves, and/or buy the mainstream propaganda, and/or ridicule or ignore anything that makes them uncomfortable or doesn't fit into their belief system than to spend even an hour or two a week researching any of the topics that, if true, could be putting them, their families and the country in harms way. It's really quite unbelievable (and sad) to me.

[ZooLife]

Many of the MSM prognostications I have read have Clinton winning the race.

Has anyone did research into how often MSM is historically wrong in its prognostications at this point in a race for the US president?

2016 US Presidential Election - Next President of the United States

Odds as of April 20 at Bovada
Hillary Clinton -275
Donald Trump +350
Bernie Sanders +1200
Ted Cruz +1200
John Kaisch +3300

[Wind]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PV_PLCC6jeI

[joeecho]

Posted by Wind (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PV_PLCC6jeI

Off topic perhaps but when I watch a show like this I ask, now why isn't a show like this on the MSM?

Then I come to me senses and think, look no further then this as proof as to just how bent the MSM is!

[onawah]

I don't know how she can live with herself--no moral compass at all.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

[onawah]

FBI director: No rush to finish Clinton email probe before convention
By Eliza Collins
04/05/16

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-d...imeline-221565

Does anyone know if any credible whistleblowers have commented on this situation lately?
It seems like the FBI must already have the goods on Hillary, so there must be another reason why they are hesitating--they could draw out the process for as long as they wanted to, presumably, so why not get it started now?
Unless they WANT to create a lot of havoc and wait until after the nomination.
I keep wondering if there is a hidden agenda to let Trump get elected so that there will be enough chaos that they could get their heart's desire and declare martial law or perhaps allow Obama to stay in office.

FBI Director James Comey said he feels no urgency to wrap up the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server before the political conventions this summer.
Comey was speaking on Monday to representatives of local law-enforcement agencies in Buffalo, New York, when he was asked about the FBI’s probe of the former secretary of state’s email system, according to the Niagara Gazette.
Making sure the inquiry is done "well" is more important than speed, he responded, even as the Democratic primary season draws to a close.
"The urgency is to do it well and promptly," Comey said. "And 'well' comes first" — meaning that the investigation could still be ongoing during the Democratic National Convention in July, he said.
While Comey wouldn’t divulge any details of the investigation, he did say that he is keeping close tabs on it “to make sure we have the resources to do it competently.

More on that subject here, though it's dated March 20th: http://nypost.com/2016/03/20/will-hi...arged-or-what/