+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 1 3 13 18 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 347

Thread: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

  1. Link to Post #41
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Our Children at Risk—Aluminum, Vaccine Schedules, and Stifled Debate
    by Gretchen DuBeau,
    Published July 15, 2016
    http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/20...tifled-debate/
    Quote When health officials assure us that almost all children should receive the full schedule of vaccinations, you would think that rigorous safety testing has repeatedly proven vaccines, their ingredients, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) schedule to be completely safe. The sobering truth is, however, that this safety testing has been conspicuously lacking and in many cases simply has not been done.

    Until these extremely serious safety concerns are adequately addressed, it is unethical—and very possibly dangerous—to force children to be vaccinated.

    Take aluminum, for example, which has been added to vaccines since the 1930’s to help jolt the body’s immune system into action. Aluminum is a well-documented neurotoxin linked with Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, asthma, hyperactivity, and Down’s syndrome.

    Despite these dangers, adequate clinical research proving aluminum adjuvants to be safe has never been done. Health authorities claim, however, that aluminum levels in vaccines are safe since it has been used for decades and that the metal is abundant in nature.

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set a limit to the amount of aluminum that can be in vaccines, but this number was based on the amount of aluminum required to enhance the effectiveness of the vaccine. The agency has not empirically determined the safest amount of intramuscularly injected aluminum, relying instead on mere belief that current levels are safe.

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined a minimum risk level for orally ingested aluminum based on rat studies, which is often what is used to justify aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. The problem is that ingesting aluminum orally, where only about 0.25% is absorbed and then filtered by the kidneys, is very different than injecting it directly into muscle, where it may be absorbed at nearly 100% efficiency over time and can accumulate in organs, including the brain.

    This complete lack of evidence proving the safety of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines is unacceptable and should concern any parent who trusts health authorities with the safety of their children.

    Yet last summer, California passed SB 277, which eliminated all non-medical exemptions to vaccinations for children attending private or public schools. This ill-advised law and the vaccine schedule it promotes threaten to mandate childhood doses of a dangerous metal.

    The rationale offered by the bill’s supporters echoed what we are so often told in the news—that the scientific community is “nearly unanimous” in its determination that vaccines are safe. To question anything vaccine-related has become akin to questioning the roundness of the Earth. This view makes rational debate extremely difficult.

    As for the safety of vaccines, the scientific community is far from “nearly unanimous.” Many doctors and researchers have raised serious concerns about vaccine ingredients like aluminum.

    Animal studies, for instance, have demonstrated a link between repeated inoculation with aluminum-containing vaccines and severe neurobehavioral outcomes (restlessness, muscle tremors, loss of response to stimuli), the presence of aluminum in central nervous system tissue, and altered expression of certain genes in the brain.

    Our independent laboratory tests show that the vaccines for DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough) and hepatitis B contain 366 and 268 micrograms of aluminum per dose, respectively. Children receiving the full CDC schedule of vaccines may be exposed to as much as 4,225 micrograms of aluminum in their first year of life.

    To put this in perspective, the animals mentioned above were given an aluminum dose in a range that is nearly comparable to what children on the CDC schedule receive.This should give us all pause.

    When we compare childhood doses to adult doses the numbers are even scarier. For an adult to get the same amount of aluminum per kilogram of weight that a newborn gets with just the hepatitis B shot, that adult would need to get 10 standard doses of that vaccine in a single day. Similarly, for an adult to get the same amount of aluminum in microgram per kilogram of weight that a two-month-old infant gets from multiple vaccine injections (a total of 1225 micrograms) scheduled for the two month pediatric visit, that adult would have to receive 34 adult doses of the hepatitis B vaccine.

    At best, we are rolling the dice when it comes to our children’s health. How has it come to this? A clue was provided in a recent Congressional audit of the FDA whichconcluded that the agency “cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak.” Our health officials are woefully behind on the science, and it’s our children who are paying the price.

    Note: This article was reprinted with the author’s permission. It was originally published in The Hill. Gretchen DuBeau is the executive director of Alliance for Natural Health USA.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (4th August 2016), Dash (27th August 2016), Fairy Friend (29th August 2016), Paul (26th July 2016), Sstarss (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (28th July 2016)

  3. Link to Post #42
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Vaccines: “preventing every bad thing” July 27/16 by Jon Rappoport

    By Jon Rappoport
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...ery-bad-thing/
    " We begin with this: “Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”

    In other words, the measles vaccine can create a worse form of measles. This is not the normal form of the illness, from which children routinely recover with the bonus of lifetime immunity. No, this is a severe, atypical, dangerous, synthetic, vaccine-induced disease.

    Now read this: “…the window of vulnerability of an infant may be even greater in vaccinated women than in with women with natural measles infection.” (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 79(5), 2008, pp. 787–792).

    Translation: Measles occurring in infants—which is unusual and dangerous—is more likely to occur when the mother has been vaccinated against measles. Why? Because she no longer passes down, to her child, the natural components of immunity to measles.

    This stunning finding can apply across the board, for all vaccines and all childhood illnesses.

    Vaccinated mothers, who would ordinarily pass down natural immune factors to their babies, often don’t.

    The vaccinators are creating a synthetic world of pretended immunity. And they want the global population to live inside that bubble—and suffer the consequences.

    Medical experts have spewed a great deal of nonsense promoting how serious childhood diseases are. This is an attempt to refute centuries of evidence showing children recover nicely from these illnesses and thus acquire lifetime immunity.

    The “seriousness” of the diseases, when they are serious, results from two factors: vaccinated mothers, and a general weakness of children’s immune systems. And that weakness results from sub-standard nutrition and a lack of nutritious breast-feeding.

    Of course, breast feeding isn’t going to be naturally nutritious if the mother has been previously loaded with vaccines. It’s a vicious circle.

    And remember this: no amount of vaccines is going to solve tremendously sub-standard childhood nutrition.

    Claiming that undernourished children must be vaccinated up to their eyeballs—as “substitute protection” against disease—is an egregious and despicable lie.

    The vaccine establishment is fully aware of what I’m discussing here, and it has covered it up.

    There is no substitute for natural immunity derived from good nutrition.

    Finally, if you revisit the first quote in this article, you’ll see another factor at work. The measles vaccine that paves the way for “severe, atypical” measles in children? The vaccine could be falsely exonerated on the grounds that the symptoms which develop in children don’t add up to measles at all. What these children have doesn’t look like measles—

    And therein lies one of the greatest secrets about all vaccines. They appear to wipe out diseases, because, after vaccination, the signs and symptoms ordinarily associated with those diseases often don’t occur.

    Instead, the old symptoms are altered or don’t appear at all. Therefore, medical experts can claim that mumps or measles or pertussis or diphtheria have been eliminated from the population—when in fact what is happening is the emergence of vaccine-induced disease with different symptoms.

    And those symptoms are given different disease-names.

    Polio? Gone. Now we have meningitis. Smallpox? Gone. Now we have “lesions of unknown origin” or Kaposi’s Sarcoma.

    Vaccinated children become more ill than they would have, and children die. But it doesn’t matter for the sellers and enforcers of vaccines, because they can say, “Look, vaccines are extraordinarily successful wherever they’re given; they wipe out diseases.”

    No they don’t.

    They just transfer the pictures of symptoms.

    And they cut off the population from natural and powerful immunity, the very same immunity that, along with improved nutrition, better basic sanitation, and a higher standard of living, made many serious diseases into light illnesses.

    It’s all a shell game. If the vaccinators confessed, they would say something like this:

    “Okay folks, here’s what we do. We give the mother and her baby a shot against Disease A. Disease A is a set of recognizable symptoms. After vaccination, that set of symptoms will occur far less often. Instead, a new set of far more dangerous symptoms will occur. We’ll call those symptoms Disease B. And we’ll say Disease A has been wiped out…”

    This shell game is played with human lives sacrificed on the altar of profits, and the creation of more debilitation and death."
    Quote We begin with this: “Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”

    In other words, the measles vaccine can create a worse form of measles. This is not the normal form of the illness, from which children routinely recover with the bonus of lifetime immunity. No, this is a severe, atypical, dangerous, synthetic, vaccine-induced disease.

    Now read this: “…the window of vulnerability of an infant may be even greater in vaccinated women than in with women with natural measles infection.” (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 79(5), 2008, pp. 787–792).

    Translation: Measles occurring in infants—which is unusual and dangerous—is more likely to occur when the mother has been vaccinated against measles. Why? Because she no longer passes down, to her child, the natural components of immunity to measles.

    This stunning finding can apply across the board, for all vaccines and all childhood illnesses.

    Vaccinated mothers, who would ordinarily pass down natural immune factors to their babies, often don’t.

    The vaccinators are creating a synthetic world of pretended immunity. And they want the global population to live inside that bubble—and suffer the consequences.

    Medical experts have spewed a great deal of nonsense promoting how serious childhood diseases are. This is an attempt to refute centuries of evidence showing children recover nicely from these illnesses and thus acquire lifetime immunity.

    The “seriousness” of the diseases, when they are serious, results from two factors: vaccinated mothers, and a general weakness of children’s immune systems. And that weakness results from sub-standard nutrition and a lack of nutritious breast-feeding.

    Of course, breast feeding isn’t going to be naturally nutritious if the mother has been previously loaded with vaccines. It’s a vicious circle.

    And remember this: no amount of vaccines is going to solve tremendously sub-standard childhood nutrition.

    Claiming that undernourished children must be vaccinated up to their eyeballs—as “substitute protection” against disease—is an egregious and despicable lie.

    The vaccine establishment is fully aware of what I’m discussing here, and it has covered it up.

    There is no substitute for natural immunity derived from good nutrition.

    Finally, if you revisit the first quote in this article, you’ll see another factor at work. The measles vaccine that paves the way for “severe, atypical” measles in children? The vaccine could be falsely exonerated on the grounds that the symptoms which develop in children don’t add up to measles at all. What these children have doesn’t look like measles—

    And therein lies one of the greatest secrets about all vaccines. They appear to wipe out diseases, because, after vaccination, the signs and symptoms ordinarily associated with those diseases often don’t occur.

    Instead, the old symptoms are altered or don’t appear at all. Therefore, medical experts can claim that mumps or measles or pertussis or diphtheria have been eliminated from the population—when in fact what is happening is the emergence of vaccine-induced disease with different symptoms.

    And those symptoms are given different disease-names.

    Polio? Gone. Now we have meningitis. Smallpox? Gone. Now we have “lesions of unknown origin” or Kaposi’s Sarcoma.

    Vaccinated children become more ill than they would have, and children die. But it doesn’t matter for the sellers and enforcers of vaccines, because they can say, “Look, vaccines are extraordinarily successful wherever they’re given; they wipe out diseases.”

    No they don’t.

    They just transfer the pictures of symptoms.

    And they cut off the population from natural and powerful immunity, the very same immunity that, along with improved nutrition, better basic sanitation, and a higher standard of living, made many serious diseases into light illnesses.

    It’s all a shell game. If the vaccinators confessed, they would say something like this:

    “Okay folks, here’s what we do. We give the mother and her baby a shot against Disease A. Disease A is a set of recognizable symptoms. After vaccination, that set of symptoms will occur far less often. Instead, a new set of far more dangerous symptoms will occur. We’ll call those symptoms Disease B. And we’ll say Disease A has been wiped out…”

    This shell game is played with human lives sacrificed on the altar of profits, and the creation of more debilitation and death.
    Last edited by onawah; 27th July 2016 at 23:52.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (4th August 2016), Ewan (28th July 2016), Fairy Friend (29th August 2016), Paul (29th July 2016), peterpam (6th August 2016), petra (8th August 2016), Sstarss (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (28th July 2016)

  5. Link to Post #43
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    SB 277 Lawsuit – Charity Dean Responds…. Can you spell “OBFUSCATION?”
    http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-lawsui...l-obfuscation/
    Quote SB 277 Lawsuit – Charity Dean Responds…. Can you spell “OBFUSCATION?”

    The “You can’t Sue Me I’m in Charge” Defense…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    SB277 Court Docs
    There is no question, in my mind, what-so-ever, that Santa Barbara County Health Department’s Charity Dean MD started out to create a “Pilot Program” in California where she, Charity Dean (and her “lobbyist” friends?), would examine all Medical Exemptions for vaccines according to a made-up criteria designed by her (and her “lobbyist” friends?).

    Then she was going to report HER definition of “suspicious activity,” through a SECRET NETWORK, directly, to Enforcement Officers at the California Medical Board for purposes of prosecution.

    However, Charity got caught. Whoops! Paperwork showed up… and the attorneys for the “Good guys” got a hold of it.

    So, little Charity got named as a Defendant….

    As the SB 277 lawsuit clearly points out…

    Little Charity Dean, for whatever motive, exceeded her authority, giving herself the power over REAL doctors who were making REAL TIME decisions, keeping at-risk children safe. Federal Law 42 USC 1983 is the Statute used in the SB 277 lawsuit to combat Charity’s ilk.

    Federal Law 42 USC 1983 basically says that “any government employee can be sued for exceeding their authority…” Specific 42 USC 1983 language is just below:

    “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.

    What disappoints me about the SB 277 lawsuit is that the attorneys on the side of “Good” in this fight against “Evil,” were, in this instance, too nice. What?

    Too nice?

    Yes, I think they were. Why? There are two separate references in Federal Law about what are known as “Color of Authority” issues. One of them is, of course, 42 USC 1983 – the CIVIL remedy. Why didn’t our people mention the other reference – the CRIMINAL remedy 18 USC 242?

    18 USC 242 is VERY specific. It says:

    Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

    Just below is a quote from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding 18 USC 242 activity. DOJ is the investigating and prosecuting entity for 18 USC 242.

    Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

    For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

    The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

    Think about that statement above. Ask “How does this apply to what Charity Dean was doing, and attempting to do?” Good question. Charity Dean claimed to have a “Medical Exemption Criteria” she was going to use to examine submitted “Medical Exemptions.” Where did she get it? From a lobbyist friend? And what authority did Charity Dean have to set herself up as the decider?

    What “Medical Exemption” Criteria Would Charity Dean Use?

    Why is that question important? Because the State Health Department system, including the counties, are DEPENDENT on the increase of vaccine percentages for income…

    Did you want me to repeat that?

    In short, to me, the Charity Deans of California only CLAIM to be acting for the health of the populace. In reality, they are the Vaccine Sales Force for the vaccine manufacturers. They have completely abrogated any health responsibility for vaccines and their deadly effects.

    Charity Dean, and her ilk, statewide, couldn’t care less if a huge batch of Made-in-China toxic death pus, was shipped here full of anthrax. They’d insist that it be IMMEDIATELY injected in California’s innocent children. They have no system in place to test vaccine batches, nor, I think, do they want one. It would interfere with the implementation of their bonus payment system…

    I am not joking…

    So, What did Charity’s Lawyers come up with?

    Just below was their first statement:

    “The law setting forth the required content of a medical exemption has existed since 1961. Plaintiffs’ request to enjoin school officials from scrutinizing and rejecting a medical exemption not meeting statutory requirements is unwarranted. This would prevent school officials from rejecting a medical exemption written by a nurse practitioner rather than a licensed physician, or a medical exemption omitting to state the vaccine from which a child is being exempted. In either instance, the medical exemption would not meet statutory requirements.”

    Huh?

    Go ahead and snicker… No where does the lawsuit mention any concern about any of this. That isn’t what Charity was looking for, remember? She was talking about “suspicious exemptions…”

    There’s more…

    The claim that the Plaintiffs lack standing to sue…

    “To the extent Plaintiffs’ Motion seeks to enjoin Defendants from rejecting a medical exemption otherwise meeting statutory requirements on grounds that the medical basis for granting it is insufficient, Plaintiffs lack standing to seek a preliminary injunction against the County of Santa Barbara. No Santa Barbara County resident Plaintiff has a medical exemption. Moreover, Plaintiffs’ evidence establishes that the County of Santa Barbara does not review medical exemptions to determine whether or not they are warranted medically. In addition, no Santa Barbara County resident Plaintiff alleges that Santa Barbara County has taken action or intends to take action that threatens any Santa Barbara County parent or child with harm. Finally, Plaintiffs’ suit establishes no grounds to enjoin the County of Santa Barbara from reviewing medical exemptions provided by schools with all personally identifiable information redacted. The Motion should be denied as against County of Santa Barbara.”

    And more…

    “Santa Barbara County’s Public Health Department (“SBCPHD”) recently initiated its Medical Exemption Pilot Program (“MEPP”). MEPP provides for SBPHD to review MEs filed with Santa Barbara County (“County”) schools to ensure that they contain five required statutory elements. These are: 1) issuance by a Doctor of Medicine or Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine; 2) a statement that the physical condition or medical circumstances of the child are such that the required immunization(s) is not considered safe; 3) identification of the vaccine(s) from which the child is exempted; 4) a statement of whether the medical exemption is permanent or temporary; and 5), if the medical exemption for a vaccine is temporary, a date that the temporary exemption expires. MEPP requires that schools redact all personally identifiable information from MEs prior to transmission to SBCPHD. ARGUMENT I. PLAINTIFFS LACK STANDING TO SUE THE COUNTY. Article III of the United States Constitution limits the judicial power of the United States to the resolution of “Cases” and “Controversies.” Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488, 492 (2009). This fundamental limitation on judicial power is reflected in the doctrine of standing. Id. at 493. To seek injunctive relief, the doctrine of standing requires that a plaintiff “show that he is under threat of suffering ‘injury in fact’ that is concrete and particularized; the threat must be actual and imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; it must be fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendants; and it must be likely that a favorable judicial decision will prevent or redress the injury.” Id. SBCPHD is a County department. Therefore, the only Plaintiffs who could be affected by any SBCPHD action are Ms. Sunukjian and A.L.S. and Dr. Mackenzie and G.J.M. Plaintiffs submitted no declaration from Dr. Mackenzie establishing that he or his son are under any actual or imminent threat of suffering any County caused injury. Dr. Mackenzie’s unsworn allegations in the First Amended Complaint are not evidence and therefore do not support standing at the preliminary injunction stage. Doe v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 199 F.3d 146, 152-153 (3rd Cir. 1999). Plaintiffs did submit Ms. Sunukjian’s declaration. She admits that she has not obtained a medical exemption for her daughter. Sunukjian Decl., ¶ 10. Thus, she cannot have filed an exemption with her daughter’s school; the school cannot have transmitted an exemption to the County.

    Of course, Charity got sued BECAUSE the Santa Barbara Health Department has no authority to require any of this…

    Interesting times…

    Stay tuned…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-lawsui...ion/#more-4563
    Last edited by onawah; 4th August 2016 at 03:07.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (4th August 2016), peterpam (6th August 2016), william r sanford72 (16th August 2016)

  7. Link to Post #44
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    New Vaccine for Zika right on schedule
    http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/miam...ght-zika-27789

    Quote "Disaster" capitalism at its
    finest!

    Miami-Dade County has begun
    using aerial spraying of the
    highly-toxic Naled insecticide,
    which is a serious danger to
    pregnant women, as it is highly-
    toxic to the nervous system
    and has been shown to cause
    violent behavior and to the
    deterioration of memory and
    learning. It is allegedly being
    sprayed to control the Aedes
    aegypti mosquitoes that carry
    the apparently harmless Zika
    virus, according to Mayor Carlos
    Gimenez, following advice from
    the state and the CDC.




    The spraying will continue once
    a week, over the next 4 weeks
    and will include both a larvicide
    and a pesticide that targets adult
    mosquitoes, even though the
    Mayor admits that spraying isn't
    effective - and even though
    according to Matthew DeGennaro,
    an expert on mosquito genetics
    at Florida International University
    who says, Aedes aegypti
    mosquitoes in the Florida Keys,
    150 miles south of Miami, have
    already developed a resistance to
    these insecticide sprays, as will
    likely become the case in Miami.

    This is happening, despite the
    fact that Zika has not been proven
    to cause microcephalic babies in
    pregnant women. The expected
    explosion in microcephaly cases in
    Brazil and in other affected areas did
    not occur - and it has never occurred
    throughout the 69-year history of
    human awareness of this very minor,
    largely asymptomatic virus - which
    happens to be patented and owned
    by the Rockefeller Foundation.

    This is happening, even though
    pesticides and larvicides, which are
    derived from petrochemicals HAVE
    been proven to cause microcephaly
    in fetuses whose mothers were
    exposed to these - and are the
    most likely cause of the rash of
    cases in Northeastern Brazil,
    where a larvicide was put in public
    drinking water.

    Dengue fever, the much more
    virulent form of this Flavivirus has
    not been known to be sexually
    transmissable, such as is the Zika
    virus. This has led to rumors that
    this new strain of Zika has been
    weaponized.

    Right on cue, MIT has just
    announced the development of a
    new vaccine that is capable of
    treating ALL of the latest
    bogeyman pandemics-that-never-
    were, from Ebola, to H1N1 to Zika
    - and the team did it in seven
    days flat!

    This DNA-based vaccine is riskier
    than traditional vaccines, because
    it has the potential to induce
    "insertional mutagenesis" and
    alter the host's DNA, potentially
    leading to cancer. Still, Emory
    University, which is associated
    with the CDC, has published a
    paper on why this vaccine should
    be injected into pregnant women.
    The reason being that "We have
    a serious threat," which is patently
    false, as far as all recent and
    exhaustive studies have shown.

    "What a glorious time to be free."
    - Steely Dan


    Video: (under 4 mins):


    Miami Sprays Neurotoxic Aerosol Gas to Fight Zika

    http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/miam...ght-zika-27789
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    peterpam (6th August 2016), Sstarss (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (16th August 2016)

  9. Link to Post #45
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    The “New” California Health Freedom Movement is in REALLY Bad Shape…

    http://bolenreport.com/new-californi...lly-bad-shape/
    Quote
    Simply Spoken – They Cannot Fight This SB 277 Battle On Their Own – They don’t know how…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    This newsletter post is aimed directly at my “Old” friends and associates in the North American Health Freedom Movement. But, even if you are not one of those, please continue. I’m telling you, right now, that we, the Health Freedom leaders, need to step in even more than we have, providing BASIC TRAINING for activists. I kid you not.

    BASIC Training?

    The situation is so bad in California that the groups that band together, for the most part, have little or no organizational or planning skills. They have no idea what is valuable and what is not. Worse, they compete to be ”LEADER” having NOTHING to offer as leadership. It really is that bad.

    In a way – it is our fault…

    They lost the first three anti-SB 277 campaigns using amazingly poor tactics and strategies – if you can call ANYTHING they did a “strategy.” It really is “The Blind Leading the Blind…”

    They do really DUMB things, and they don’t want ANY advice… I’ll tell you about one of those situations in a minute.

    And, they get irate, and whimpery, when somebody like me says “you didn’t do that very well…”

    These people think FaceBook is an organizing tool.

    In the words of Kent Heckenlively JD – “Arghh…”

    So, let’s start right out.


    Jim Turner – You are one of the few still alive Health Freedom Monsters older than me – and not by much. I know you are extremely busy managing the assault with the SB 277 Lawsuit as lead attorney. But I also know you’ve got a smile on your face for this is just the kind of battle you have always liked.

    Me too, dude…

    But Jim, we need one more thing – that 200,000 strong Citizens For Health Network of yours, that knows how to do stuff. Why? Read the above…

    Let’s talk Jim…

    Sally Fallon – You’ve got a monstrous organization of people there in the Westin A. Price Foundation who know their stuff. I know you don’t want me to tell any of these people how long we’ve known each other, to give your age away, but Sally, YOU would certainly be better at training “newbies” than I would. You are MUCH nicer. They’d LISTEN to you.

    Hunter Lewis – I know how much work your 500,000 member Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) is doing every day, and have been doing for more years than I can remember (Actually, I DO remember) but Hunter, my friend, WE’VE GOT A PROBLEM. The next generation of activists needs to be trained.

    Right now… it is URGENT.

    We need to talk.

    Diane Miller JD – I don’t care how busy you and Jerri are running the Health Freedom Coalition and all that. You guys know how to set up and run effective State Health Freedom coalitions. You guys aren’t getting any younger either. You know what needs to be done…

    You need to figure out how to teach it…

    Mike Adams – Of course your Natural News offering is terrific. I can’t imagine how hard it is to put out twenty four articles a day, and all of them great. But Mike, as we’ve talked about on many occasions, this newer generation, especially here in California, think that FaceBook is a primary communications tool. They need to learn what real communications networks can do. We need workshops Mike. And you know how to set them up.

    Peter McCarthy – These California people have no idea, for the have nothing to compare with, what it would be like to have a Health Freedom Standing Army like your Texas Health Freedom Coalition.. You need to write an article about how you and your friends in Texas would have handled an asshole like Senator Richard Pan putting forth a dumb-assed mandatory vaccine bill in the State of Texas. More, you need to teach SELECTED people HOW to set up, and maintain a California standing army – and use effective tactics.

    Rima Laibow MD, General Bert Stubblebine, Ralph Fucetola JD – These people in California have no idea how, or why, your Natural Solutions Foundation (NSF) exists, and what it is capable of doing, what it does, has done, and why. General Bert is a retired head of US Army Intelligence. These people have no concept of how to conduct aggressive campaigns, and play to win. They have NOTHING to compare with. They need to learn not to be shy, and how to strike, and when. In California, they don’t have a clue of how to play to win. But YOU do. You need to teach this stuff.

    All the rest of you – you know who you are. We need to get going in California…

    The SB 277 Lawsuit fight is pretty much being conducted by all of us old war dogs.

    The younger people here, those that ran the earlier campaigns, I think, cannot find their ass cheeks with either hand. They think that “coordination” means you match lipstick color with your toenail polish when you go to see your legislator’s staff. It is really pathetic.

    Pathetic…

    There isn’t three pounds of youthful campaign organizing skills, much less war tactics, in the whole damn State.

    Where are the brutal bastards when you need them? Where are the lionesses of old who could throw money in a parking meter, gut a public agency in an afternoon, wipe the snot off the kids faces, and grab a pizza and ice cream on the way home. I’ll tell you where they are – They’re in Retirement Communities playing shuffleboard or 500 Rummy, waiting to head out in the motorhome once all of those noisy little monsters (other people’s kids) are back in school. I see them in Yosemite, Kings Canyon the coastal Campgrounds, sitting at the picnic table cleaning their Smith and Wessons, Glocks, and Remingtons. The MaryJane is in the freezer. And that look is still in their eyes.

    But we didn’t train our children and grandchildren.

    Here’s the situation…

    Not long ago I suggested that certain activities might be a good idea surrounding the Preliminary Restraining Order hearing on August 12th, 2016 – a gathering. You probably saw it right here in the BolenReport. I said something like “Meet on the Courthouse Steps…” I even contacted some San Diego groups through several different channels to get that done.

    In the old days, several people would have nodded their heads and said “I’ll get back to you Friday with a plan” – meaning a detailed plan that covered every eventuality so that our teams would know exact details of the logistics, including where we were going to meet afterwards to drink some wine. EVERYBODY knew how to do that – some people could make a plan on a bar napkin and lay it out before we left our meeting place.

    It ain’t like that now… These younger people can’t find their mother’s phone number without an IPhone. And if it’s not on the internet, forget it.

    These people in San Diego had almost five weeks notice to find a simple meeting place where a measly five hundred people could comfortably gather to meet each other. What they ended up doing was so incredibly brainless, so non-considerative of REALITY, that I wrote a piece recommending that no one go to it.

    Now they’re mad at me, whining about what I said on their FaceBook pages, of course. And insisting they are going anyway… (I’ll bet they paint their toenails to match their lipstick).

    What did they do? (Not do)?

    Before I tell you that, I’m sure, my friends, that you are beginning to see why I am making it clear that someone other than me has to set up training. Someone who doesn’t verbally, and journalistically, SCORCH them like I’m known for. These young people are tender and sensitive. I’ll bet most of them have never even fired a weapon, much less a machine gun. To them napalm sounds like something they’d plant in their yard over by the fake fountain where their miniature dog pees.

    What is needed here is a woman’s touch – and NOT one with Army Ranger training either. This is a job for Sally or Diane, or Gretchen from ANH, etc. No Rima not you – you bomb and scorch as well as I do. And definitely not you Peter – once these young people figure out that those B-52s you drove around at altitude were dropping 500 and 1000 pound bombs on opponents they’d chew off their own lipstick and think about where to get a hot rock massage on the way home.

    Here’s what I wrote that got them all upset…

    You do realize that you are dealing here, with this (name removed), with one of the San Diego crowd that even with a full five weeks notice, couldn’t get off their dead asses long enough to find a simple place for people to gather other than a downtown five-star hotel. (Insert laughter here).

    And, very obviously, none of them went down to the Courthouse to find out when, where, and if, they could gather there. Now, little (name removed) is bitter because she, and her lazy-assed friends, got called out for their lack of consideration for others from out-of-town, and with children in tow..

    Let her go down to the Westin and have a Martini on Friday with the other non-producers. They can tell each other how special they are. Then they can call up Ginger Taylor and get a membership in the Canary Party – they just passed the self-centered incompetence initiation test. All they need now is a photo with a Congressman.

    See, I’ll bet that Sally, or Gretchen, or Diane would have delivered that “you could have handled this situation much better” message a little differently.

    Ya think?

    Stay tuned…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    william r sanford72 (16th August 2016)

  11. Link to Post #46
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    "How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public"
    The World Health Organization has prepared a manual for dealing with "vaccine deniers."
    From the Canary Party
    Quote "Rule 1 - The general public is your target audience, not the vocal vaccine denier.
    Rule 2 - Aim to correct the content AND unmask the techniques that the vocal vaccine denier is using.
    Rule 3 - Make the public audience more resilient against anti-vaccine statements and stories; support the vaccine hesitants in their vaccine acceptance decision."
    When talking to public health officials trained by WHO about vaccine injury remember, they don't care that your loved one was harmed, they aren't even talking to you.
    See:
    http://www.euro.who.int/__data/asset...ublic.pdf?ua=1
    Last edited by onawah; 15th August 2016 at 22:24.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (19th August 2016), peterpam (25th August 2016), william r sanford72 (16th August 2016)

  13. Link to Post #47
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    SB 277 Lawsuit – We’re Just Waiting…
    http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-lawsuit-just-waiting/

    Hopefully, Lunch will Be Along in a Minute…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    Quote A list of the SB 277 Court Documents in original PDF format – copied from Pacer court file…SB277 Court Docs:
    http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-court-documents/

    Last Friday, August 12th, 2016, SB 277 Lawsuit San Diego Federal Court Judge Dana M. Sabraw, after hearing oral arguments in the Preliminary Injunction Hearing said ”I’ll Give you My Decision in Writing Within Two Weeks”…

    Two weeks?

    You can bet that Judge Sabraw will be very careful with the writing of this legal decision. He, and his staff, will be spending quite some time on it.

    Why? This case is going to the US Supreme Court.

    The Options…

    The decision to issue, or not issue, a Preliminary Injunction preventing the implementation of SB 277, could be in our hands any minute. Whatever it is we proceed to the next step.

    As I’ve said before, whatever happens, the side that loses this hearing will immediately Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

    So, we wait…

    But, there are some side issues…

    I didn’t just wait five days because I was busy. I am always right on top of what is happening. I knew the Judge’s decision to give himself time within minutes of that action. It was THOSE OTHER THINGS, and my investigation into them, that kept me from acting.

    Something strange was going on – in fact, TWO strange things.

    Strange thing number one – Apparently there are some people interfering with our attorneys’ ability to manage the case – and it is severe. I received, I think, five separate reports of someone, an aggressive woman (NOT part of the legal team) at the Hearing, who was CONSTANTLY handing notes forward, obviously trying to distract our team’s efforts to answer the Judge’s questions. I HOPE, for our sakes, that that person didn’t upset the Judge against us.

    Attorneys prepare days ahead of time for Judge’s questions, discussing answers, and points, with their colleagues, so as to make a smooth presentation. They DO NOT need distraction…

    I have been investigating who that person was, and at this point I can say “She was not invited to participate….” I have questioned this person via email, about what she was up to, who she represented, and, so far, have not received an answer.

    Don’t worry – I’ll find the answer one way or another.

    Strange thing number two – Several hours after the hearing three of the attorneys met with the Plaintiffs and other interested parties to talk about the Hearing events. A video was made, and it aired on Periscope, and invited “comments.” The readily visible “comments” took up most of the left side of the screen, and at 12:47 into the video one of the attorneys was offered a “blow job.” Just a little further the REALLY NASTY COMMENTS started.

    So, how did those “comments” appear so fast. The “skeptics” had no notification of the video…

    It took a while to get the video taken down.

    Rife with rumors – I’ve been getting bits and pieces of a story telling me that there is a group, acting behind the scenes, to disrupt the case, and our attorney’s management of it. That wouldn’t surprise me a bit. If any of you have anything to contribute in that scene, please get a hold of me.

    I do have, based on the information I am gathering, a working theorem of what’s happening, and I think, so do the attorneys.

    i suspect that some strong language has been, and is being, used, this last week, in attorney communication networks.

    We’ll see…

    I’m getting hungry. Where’s lunch?

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (19th August 2016), Paul (18th August 2016), william r sanford72 (18th August 2016)

  15. Link to Post #48
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    How to pirate Vaxxed…and why you should think twice before doing so

    Quote http://bolenreport.com/pirate-vaxxed.../#comment-2845

    How to pirate Vaxxed…and why you should think twice before doing so.

    Perspective by Alan Davis – Health Freedom Activist

    In the last few days, some pirated copies of Vaxxed have been making the rounds on various activist Facebook groups. I get it, people want to see the film. I personally only got to watch it about a week ago. It took that long for the forces in our life to favorably converge: someone to watch the little one, a little surplus in our budget, and a night my wife and I were both available that coincided with a Vaxxed Screening.

    This is not an infomercial. Really…

    But I want to increase awareness of two new ways Vaxxed is being distributed.

    The screening my wife and I went to was one of the first “Theatrical On Demand” screenings of Vaxxed. Anyone willing to sign up as a Movie Captain can bring Vaxxed to their city or town. When enough tickets are sold, the movie tips, and is on the schedule. If it doesn’t tip, nobody pays a dime. All the nitty gritty details are handled by Gathr Films. All a Movie Captain needs is some enthusiasm and some ways to reach their potential audience.

    If you are interested in either becoming a Movie Captain, or finding a screening near you put on by a Movie Captain:
    http://vaxxedthemovie.com/theatrical-on-demand/
    http://vaxxedthemovie.com/theatrical...ed-screenings/

    Vaxxed is also available via streaming. For $3.99 you can view it on your computer, device, and on certain TV boxes like Roku or Apple TV. Details here.

    Some people know what to do.

    A pirated copy of the movie was posted on a forum. The admins saw the error of their ways, after reading a few comments. They did the right thing by taking it down. Why do I think it was the right thing to do? Keep reading and I will answer that question.

    And some people can justify the most outrageous nonsense.

    Before the copy was removed, a select few of us weighed in with rationalizations and encouragement to anyone to go right ahead and watch the film for free. And to hell with anyone who might try to stop them, because, REASONS!

    Here is one such post, suggesting piracy is not the right thing to do:NIC-Vaxxed-Piracy-Post

    Along came the swift response:

    NIC Vaxxed Piracy

    One of them pans the movie, but still gives permission to steal it. The other demonizes Del Bigtree, like he is getting rich off the film.

    Let’s think about that for a moment… After creating Vaxxed and going on national tour with the film, Mr. Bigtree will never be invited back to produce and direct the hit TV show “The Doctors”. This man has quite literally limited his career options in order to speak the truth about the CDC Whistleblower.

    I read someone else saying only the film’s distributor benefited financially from the streaming rentals. I’d never buy into the idea that any filmmaker would just give all the revenue from a certain market segment to their distributor. Would you?

    It truly is the most outrageous sort of nonsense.

    Vaxxed’s Distributor

    The distributor, Cinema Libre, has created some problems for itself by choosing to distribute this film. Two of their executives were present at our screening. They did a, I’m just going to call it a “different” Q&A, unlike any other Vaxxed screening. Theirs is the story of unsung heroes who did the impossible. They took a major public relations disaster, turned it into an opportunity, and distributed a film three months ahead of schedule. In the process making it perhaps the most successful educational campaign our movement has seen. The entire Vaxxed Team knows how to execute a winning campaign. I’ll vouch for them any day.

    The simple reality is…

    The Vaxxed Team are tirelessly traveling the country, in the Vaxxed Bus (ok, it’s an RV), talking to anyone who will listen, and listening to anyone who wants to talk. They have documented their travels via non-stop Periscope and Facebook Live Streams. Confronted legislators where they can (and where said legislators aren’t running away whilst urinating). Shared the stories of numerous parents, children, adults, and even some medical professionals. It’s an interactive educational experience, that enables us to collectively tell our truth.

    In a “Theatrical on Demand” screening, the Vaxxed core team does their Q&A via a reel, which starts out by asking people with vaccine injured children to stand up. Being present and standing in testimony to how our nephew’s story has changed our lives, while seeing similarly-affected others, all revealing ourselves in public, was extremely powerful. Especially considering some portion of the audience just got a drink from the firehose. We were brought into the storytelling process to make the point to everyone there that, no, this film isn’t bull****.

    The simple reality is, this all costs money. Some of which must be coming from ticket sales and streaming rentals.

    In closing…

    I’ll leave you all with this one question to ponder. Ok, two. Who or I probably should say: “What industry benefits from the Vaxxed Campaign losing money through piracy?”

    I know it’s only one question. I wasn’t lying. Question number two is left as an exercise for the reader.

    Perspective by Alan Davis – Health Freedom Activist
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (19th August 2016), Houman (24th August 2016), Paul (18th August 2016), william r sanford72 (18th August 2016)

  17. Link to Post #49
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC
    (recommended by the Canary Party)
    May 31, 2016
    by James Ottar Grundvig (Author), Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Introduction)
    https://www.amazon.com/dp/151070843X..._X0JTxbMVD45JW
    Quote The explosive true story of fraud, embezzlement, and government betrayal.

    In 2000, the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) carried out a secret mission to bury, skew, and manipulate data in six vaccine safety studies, in a coordinated effort to control the message that “vaccines do not cause autism.” They did so via secret meetings and backtesting health-care data. The CDC invested tens of millions of dollars in a foreign health-care data analytics startup run by Danish scientist Poul Thorsen, a move to ensure that no link ever surfaced. But fate had other ideas. The agency soon learned it couldn’t control Thorsen. In 2011, the US Justice Department indicted him for the theft of more than $1 million of CDC grant money.

    Master Manipulator exposes the CDC’s hidden agenda for the cover-up. Influenced by Big Pharma money, future high-paying jobs, and political lobbyists, CDC executives charted a course different than what the findings of earlier vaccine safety studies revealed. The CDC needed an outsider to “flatten” the results of the data, while building an exit strategy: a fall guy in case the secret plan was exposed. Thorsen fit the bill nicely, conducting studies overseas. But the CDC’s plan backfired, as Thorsen took the money to the bank and the power went to his head. It would take years for his fraud scheme—funneling CDC grant money to a Danish university and then back to a CDC bank account he controlled—to play out.

    Master Manipulator is a true story of fraud and betrayal, and an insider’s view of what takes place behind the closed doors of agencies and drug companies, and with the people tasked to protect the health of American children. It’s a cautionary tale of the dangers of blind trust in the government and the health-care industry.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (19th August 2016), Houman (24th August 2016), Paul (19th August 2016), william r sanford72 (25th August 2016)

  19. Link to Post #50
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    SB 277 Lawsuit – The “Do Not Cross” Line…
    http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-lawsui...ine/#more-4699

    Quote This case is a decision point. It will set policy nationwide for a long time to come on two basic issues – “who owns our children,” and “what can be forced on them?”

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    SB277 Court Docs: http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-court-documents/
    Attached to this article is a transcript of the Oral Arguments (link above) held in the Preliminary Injunction Hearing August 12th, 2016. You can read every word that was said. But, before you do I am going to give you some background, some definitions, and a roadmap so you can follow what was being said. Why? These are very technical legal arguments I am going to attempt to make simple, and common-sense.

    This case is NOT about vaccines – although those ultra-dangerous Made-in-China-death-pus-tubes are the problem the case seems to revolve around.

    Some background…

    The real point of the case is simple – what are the limits that the State can do claiming “The Greater Good?” If today they can force dangerous vaccines into our children, tomorrow they can drag our nine-year-olds into sexual slavery, or grind them up into food for cattle for that same claim of “The Greater Good.”

    I’m not joking.

    It gets really scary when you think that a grinning psychopath/sociopath(?) like California Senator Dicky Pan gets to decide what, exactly, defines “The Greater Good” and who it applies to.

    What the Plaintiff’s attorneys are saying to the Court is simple “Where’s the line Judge?” Legal precedent says that the State, under a Strict Scrutiny review, must follow specific rules to make laws. Our side is saying that the State of California did not follow the rules with this law.

    Before these issues can be argued in court they have to be broken down into legal components. And, that’s where our attorneys are taking the case.

    Where we are going…

    To the US Supreme Court..

    To get where the Plaintiff is going in the argument presented both generally in the SB 277 case, and specifically in the Preliminary Injunction Hearing, we need to have a clear understanding of two legal concepts: “Status Quo Ante” and “Strict Scrutiny, ” and one doctrine called “Hybrid Rights.”

    In short, the two concepts, used together say “Your honor we need to stay right where we were before SB 277 (status quo ante) while we carefully scrutinize SB 277’s Constitutionality using the Strict Scrutiny guidelines.…”

    What is “status quo ante?” It is a legal term defined as “the previously existing state of affairs.”

    What is “Strict Scrutiny?” Strict scrutiny is a form of judicial review that courts use to determine the constitutionality of certain laws. To pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a “compelling governmental interest,” and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

    What are “hybrid rights“ – A hybrid rights claim involves a challenge that the government is simultaneously violating one’s right to the free exercise of religion and some other “constitutional protection[].” The strength of this other constitutional protection, known as the companion claim, determines whether a hybrid rights claim will be successful.

    The Plaintiffs are basically saying “Throw this crappy SB 277 law out the window Judge. It just plain sucks… “

    Just below is the exact language used in the court documents..

    “Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant their Motion and preserve the status quo ante while the parties litigate this case. California’s children deserve better than to be barred from school and subjected to forced permanent quarantine, isolation, humiliation, prejudice, and emotional distress because of an unnecessary, draconian and discriminatory law that flies in the face of the State’s compelling interest in educating children.”

    The First Amendment Argument…

    I am going to oversimplify what I am about to show you. Whenever I do this my attorney friends cringe a little, but legal things need to be explained to NORMAL people in terms they can relate to.

    One of the primary arguments of the case against SB 277 is that, in essence, SB 277 denies First Amendment protected religious exemptions in more than one way. Courts have held that there is little, or no difference between religious and personal belief exemptions, and that States cannot legislate against religion – period. Throughout the Oral Argument, several court case names are used – each of which set a standard of review, in some way, for the issues involved in the SB 277 case.

    I won’t go into any detail of those – for we will all, except attorneys, tune out, and start mumbling, as our eyes cross that part of the pages. When you read through the transcript just scan over those references, and get back to the general ideas presented.

    What is VERY IMPORTANT to our side is that the Judge agrees to use the concept of “Strict Scrutiny“ rather than “Rational Scrutiny” to examine SB 277 for Constitutionality.

    Why do we want that?

    Because the State Cannot pass the “Strict Scrutiny“ test…

    Not a chance…

    Why?

    “To pass strict scrutiny, the law or policy must satisfy three tests:

    It must be justified by a compelling governmental interest. While the Courts have never brightly defined how to determine if an interest is compelling, the concept generally refers to something necessary or crucial, as opposed to something merely preferred. Examples include national security, preserving the lives of a large number of individuals, and not violating explicit constitutional protections.

    The law or policy must be narrowly tailored to achieve that goal or interest. If the government action encompasses too much (overbroad) or fails to address essential aspects of the compelling interest, then the rule is not considered narrowly tailored.

    The law or policy must be the least restrictive means for achieving that interest: there must not be a less restrictive way to effectively achieve the compelling government interest. The test will be met even if there is another method that is equally the least restrictive. Some legal scholars consider this “least restrictive means” requirement part of being narrowly tailored, but the Court generally evaluates it separately.

    The State simply cannot meet this standard with SB 277.

    So, where’s that transcript of the Oral Arguments from August 12th, 2016?

    Click here to go read it.
    http://bolenreport.com/wp-content/up...pt-0812162.pdf
    Our side’s arguments were, and are SUPERB. Try not to fall asleep through the government’s presentation. Laugh when they say they are punishing parents.

    You’ll see…

    Stay tuned…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Houman (24th August 2016), william r sanford72 (25th August 2016)

  21. Link to Post #51
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    The film Vaxxed could be outlawed in California, if this bill passes
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...s-bill-passes/

    by Jon Rappoport


    California bill AB 1671


    “Let’s see, Mr. Reporter. You received an undercover recording of a medical researcher confessing his crimes. You posted the recording and wrote about it. You’re the one who is guilty of a crime. Next case!”

    “Wait, Your Honor! That recording is vital information for the public. It shows that a vaccine considered to be safe actually causes brain damage in children.”

    “No. It shows you violated the law by posting the recording. It was illegally made, and you aided and abetted and forwarded that crime. As I said, next case!”

    Buckle up.

    The shocking film Vaxxed (trailer) is drawing audiences all over the country. It details the confessions of a CDC researcher, William Thompson, who states that he and his colleagues buried data in a key study on the MMR vaccine.

    In the study, the vaccine was given a free pass, with assurances that it didn’t increase the risk of autism in children—when, in fact, the data showed it did increase that risk.

    ***The key moments in Vaxxed are audio recordings of CDC researcher Thompson confessing his sins.

    But wait. Now we have a bill, AB 1671, up before the California legislature. If it passes, it could make it a crime to screen Vaxxed or even write an article about it.

    Those recordings of Thompson could be labeled “undercover,” and “illegal,” and therefore make them the target of AB 1671.

    Furthermore, AB 1671 specifically seeks to protect “healthcare providers” from “exposure” via “undercover recordings” documenting their crimes. Certainly, by stretching the definitions a bit, the CDC, for whom Thompson works, and Thompson himself, could be considered such healthcare providers. Lawyers could argue that position until the cows come home and hang up a case in various courts for years—while an injunction prohibiting the screening of Vaxxed remains in force.

    Nick Cahill, at the Courthouse News Service, reports on AB 1671 (“Abortion Clinic Sting Videos Sprout Free-Speech Battle”, Thursday, August 11, 2016):

    “The bill would criminalize publishing undercover video footage of ‘health care providers’ and subject third parties, including journalists, to penalties for reporting and distributing the illegally recorded footage.” [My comment: It appears criminal penalties could be applied to anyone who posts the videos and comments on them, online. Not just reporters. And surely, audio recordings, as well as videos, would be banned.]

    Cahill continues: “Under AB 1671, a journalist receiving and posting footage from an anonymous source could be punished by the state as well as be opened up to potential civil lawsuits. Whistleblowers would not be exempt from the proposal either, regardless of how they obtained the illegal footage.”

    In the case of Vaxxed, the film makers received or obtained the recordings of CDC researcher Thompson and used them to make their case: Thompson was confessing to crimes he and colleagues committed at the CDC.

    But if AB 1671 passes, releasing those recordings and commenting on them, in a film, could be considered a crime, punishable by fine, jail—and the film makers could also be open to lawsuits.

    And of course, Vaxxed could be banned from all theaters in California.

    As bizarre as it seems, AB 1671 isn’t just targeting people who make the undercover recordings. Its focus is on reporters who receive those recordings and then use them, post them, and write about them.

    This lunatic attack on free speech coordinates tightly with the infamous 2015 California law, SB277, which made vaccinating California school children mandatory.

    Vaxxed certainly raises ominous questions about that law—and now the government of California is considering the addition of a new law that could ban Vaxxed.

    DON’T EVEN REPORT VACCINE CRIMES.

    “Your kids must get vaccinated, and don’t report vaccine crimes and vaccine damage, when the knowledge of that damage comes from ‘undercover recordings’.”

    That’s quite stunning, when you think about it.

    The California Gestapo is trying to expand its reach.

    Do you really think all this effort is coming from some genuine concern for “protecting the children?”

    If so, you’re badly mistaken. This is about naked suppression of the truth, big profits for vaccine manufacturers, and neurological damage in kids.

    If you don’t think so, see Vaxxed.

    While you can.

    Jon Rappoport
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  22. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    fourty-two (24th August 2016), Holly Lindin (21st September 2016), Houman (24th August 2016), Sierra (23rd August 2016), TrumanCash (25th August 2016), william r sanford72 (25th August 2016)

  23. Link to Post #52
    Avalon Member TrumanCash's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th April 2012
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    1,029
    Thanks
    2,591
    Thanked 8,395 times in 1,002 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    I just saw the movie Vaxxed. It was very well done! All I can say is watch the movie and tell your friends about it. Everyone needs to see this movie!

    http://vaxxedthemovie.com/

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TrumanCash For This Post:

    Holly Lindin (21st September 2016), Houman (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (25th August 2016)

  25. Link to Post #53
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Preliminary Injunction in the challenge to #SB277 is denied.
    From the Canary Party's FB page:
    Quote "CONCLUSION
    State Legislatures have a long history of requiring children to be vaccinated
    as a condition to school enrollment, and for as many years, both state and federal courts have upheld those requirements against constitutional challenge. History , in itself, does not compel the result in this case, but the case law makes clear that States may impose mandatory vaccination requirements without providing for religious or conscientious objections. Although the removal of the PBE here affects a great many people, this Court, is not prepared to hold that a minority, residing or remaining in any city or town where [disease] is prevalent, may thus defy the will of its constituted authorities, acting in good faith for all, under the legislative sanction of the State. If such be the privilege of a minority then a like privilege would belong to each individual of the community, and the
    spectacle would be presented of the welfare and safety of an entire population being subordinated to the notions of a single individual who
    chooses to remain a part of that population.
    Jacobson, 197 U.S. at 37-38. Over 100 years ago, the Supreme Court was,
    unwilling to hold it to be an element in the liberty secured by the
    Constitution of the United States that one person, or a minority of persons, residing in any community and enjoying the benefits of its local
    government, should have the power thus to dominate the majority when
    supported in their action by the authority of the State.
    Id. at 38. In this case, Plaintiffs have not made a showing that they are entitled to the extraordinary remedy of a preliminary injunction. Accordingly, their motion is
    respectfully denied.
    IT IS SO ORDERED."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (27th August 2016)

  27. Link to Post #54
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    20th December 2015
    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 88 times in 24 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Heres a short summary of 4 people I know who took statins.

    1) lady took statins as recommended by doctor, I said to her early on they were a fad and bad for the memory, as the brain is 40% fat and requires fatty acids to help form new cells and is part of the metabolic process. 6 months after, her eye brows fall out (and never come back) and also some of her hair. So... 5 years later I get a call saying maybe she should stop taking them, emm yes really? Anyway, now she also has abnormal cell growths (not cancer not yet) and strange lumps have appeared on her hands and arms. Also, I can tell from the moment she started taking them her memory got worse and she was mentally slower - since stopping them, her memory has come back 80% what it was. And before the statins she had absolutely nothing wrong with her.
    2) the boyfriend: took them for only 3 days and got large pains and cramps in all the muscles particularly the arms, he couldn't lift anything up, stopped asap.
    3) husband. took a combination of statins+warfarin (for minor heart problem), suffered a massive stroke. Now since the 90's there has been a large rise in people getting strokes who just happen to be taking warfarin(should not be on it for over 6 months). Now what I suggest is the statin has reduced the bodies ability to fight off poisons, eating fat reduces and absorbs toxins but the cholesterol levels are messed with so the combination most likely increased an already likely stroke scenerio - especially if that person takes them on an empty stomach.
    4) wife and mother: started statins and after 2 years a black shadow appeared on her lungs, was given steroids to help breathing. The steroids masked the symptoms and reduced the immune system, cancer took advantage of the weakness and appeared 3 months before critical. By the end she was given a whole cocktail of drugs that just kept making her worse, and the 1 single dose of chemo put her straight into a coma then death.(took statins for 6 years)

    Why is it that health food and body building shops sell Coenzyme Q10 as a performance enhancer but statins inhbits the body's production of this?
    And CoQ10 just happens to generate energy for cells and is a powerful antioxidant that mops up old possibly cancerous cells.
    The cell walls and metabolic process of every single cell in the body is altered by medding with the fat levels.

    http://www.functionalmedicineunivers...public/883.cfm

    ''What many people are unaware of is the fact that when CoQ10 is depleted it causes the LDL cholesterol to become oxidized. This in turn sets off a cascade of events making the LDL cholesterol drill holes in the arterial wall causing major inflammation. This inflammation sets you up for an increased risk of getting a heart attack or stroke.''

  28. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dash For This Post:

    Holly Lindin (21st September 2016), Houman (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (27th August 2016)

  29. Link to Post #55
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    What is meant by "Preliminary Injunction in the challenge to #SB277 is denied:
    ...which is the question I asked on the Canary Party's thread about the case being heard now in California re mandatory vaccines.
    Following is that conversation :
    Quote So does that mean mandatory vaccines in CA. are a done deal?
    It means no injunctive relief during the course of the litigation.
    What is "injunctive relief"?
    "Injunctive relief" is a court order for the defendant to stop a specified action or behavior - in this case the action of banning children from school.
    The court was asked by the plaintiffs to suspend the law temporarily while the case was being heard, but the court refused to do this. This denial of the injunction is not a final decision on the case - the case will move forward; it will be heard in court. But in the meantime, the law is in effect and children are being banned from school if they don't have a medical exemption and haven't received all the required doses of vaccines.
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Preliminary Injunction in the challenge to #SB277 is denied.
    From the Canary Party's FB page:
    Quote "CONCLUSION
    State Legislatures have a long history of requiring children to be vaccinated
    as a condition to school enrollment, and for as many years, both state and federal courts have upheld those requirements against constitutional challenge. History , in itself, does not compel the result in this case, but the case law makes clear that States may impose mandatory vaccination requirements without providing for religious or conscientious objections. Although the removal of the PBE here affects a great many people, this Court, is not prepared to hold that a minority, residing or remaining in any city or town where [disease] is prevalent, may thus defy the will of its constituted authorities, acting in good faith for all, under the legislative sanction of the State. If such be the privilege of a minority then a like privilege would belong to each individual of the community, and the
    spectacle would be presented of the welfare and safety of an entire population being subordinated to the notions of a single individual who
    chooses to remain a part of that population.
    Jacobson, 197 U.S. at 37-38. Over 100 years ago, the Supreme Court was,
    unwilling to hold it to be an element in the liberty secured by the
    Constitution of the United States that one person, or a minority of persons, residing in any community and enjoying the benefits of its local
    government, should have the power thus to dominate the majority when
    supported in their action by the authority of the State.
    Id. at 38. In this case, Plaintiffs have not made a showing that they are entitled to the extraordinary remedy of a preliminary injunction. Accordingly, their motion is
    respectfully denied.
    IT IS SO ORDERED."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Houman (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (27th August 2016)

  31. Link to Post #56
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    More conversation on this subject on the FB Canary Party page at: https://www.facebook.com/TheCanaryPa...72273268795120
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Houman (27th August 2016), william r sanford72 (27th August 2016)

  33. Link to Post #57
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Grotesquely incompetent Judge won’t suspend mandatory vaccination
    8/27 by Jon Rappoport
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...y-vaccination/

    Quote
    “Hey, let’s just make up stuff in court, it’s a party.”

    I’ll keep this as simple as I can.

    The infamous SB277, passed into CA law in 2015, made vaccines mandatory for school children in the state.

    Last month, a lawsuit was filed, with the purpose of overturning the law. The lawyers asked Federal Judge Dana Sabraw to keep the law from going into effect while the case moves forward.

    Sabraw just said no.

    Among the reasons he cited for his decision (LA Times, 8/28): “U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego wrote that state Legislatures have ‘a long history of requiring children to be vaccinated as a condition to school enrollment, and for as many years, both state and federal courts have upheld those requirements against constitutional challenge’.”

    I don’t see how Judge Sabraw’s opinion could be more ridiculous. Or ludicrous. Or incompetent. Or wrong.

    Why? Because ‘the long history’ he refers to is quite different.

    The states have always upheld exemptions from vaccination on several grounds: medical waiver, religious objection, philosophical objection. THAT’S the tradition.

    SB277 goes against the tradition, to say the very least. SB277 breaks new ground in allowing the state to operate as a medical fascist in the area of vaccinations.

    Under SB277, a parent’s only option, aside from a hard-to-obtain medical exemption, is to home school her child. And obviously, not all parents can afford to exercise that option, because they have to work to pay the bills.

    From what source is Judge Sabraw getting his information about “long history” and tradition? From a CDC PR pamphlet? From a drug company? From aliens on the moon?

    His considered opinion in this case is on the order of saying, “Look, all states have always had strict rules about crossing the street on Thursdays. You can’t do it or you’re breaking the law.”

    Maybe the Judge just decided to make up his version of history out of thin air.

    Actually, it appears he did that in a prior case. The issue there centered on what lawyers can and can’t say during their closing arguments. They can’t go off and say anything. They definitely can’t refer to “facts” that were never presented during the trial. They can’t just make stuff up.

    The website, abovethelaw.com, has the story. Joe Patrice colorfully writes:

    “The case arose in 2010, when a guy was stopped by border agents and Skippy the Wonder Dog managed to uncover 112 sealed packages weighing 321.33 pounds (or 146.06 kilograms if you’re Canadian or otherwise a Communist) of marijuana. The defendant claimed he was set up. In the government’s rebuttal closing, the prosecutor, Steve Miller, pulled some Hocus Pocus and started telling the jury about a number of reasons why the defendant’s story couldn’t be believed. That would be par for the course, except none of these ‘facts’ were brought out during the trial itself.

    “When defense counsel objected, Judge Dana M. Sabraw responded ‘with the admonition that this is counsel’s argument, it is up to the jury to determine the facts.’ Stellar judging. I wish I’d known about the “you can assert whatever you want in closing because it’s ‘up to the jury to determine facts’” rule.”

    Yes, let’s just invent the law as we go along. Make up the law out of thin air. Make up tradition and history out of thin air. Make up whatever you need to make up, in order to deny the people of California a fair hearing on a fascist law that forces them to vaccinate their children with the full CDC load of toxic chemicals and germs.

    Well, the rabid pro-vaccine forces have their Judge. He’s perfect.

    His bias, even before the lawsuit has gotten off the ground, is sufficient reason for him to recuse himself.

    “I’m stepping away. I was making up history out of nothing. Let another Judge take over who actually knows a little about the past.”

    Get Sabraw out of there. He’s doing fiction.

    Bad fiction.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Paul (29th August 2016), william r sanford72 (29th August 2016)

  35. Link to Post #58
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Mandatory vaccination in CA: let’s school a Federal Judge
    8/27/16
    by Jon Rappoport
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...federal-judge/

    Quote Judge Sabraw: here’s something you didn’t know about the DPT shot

    I’ll repeat myself a bit here, in case you missed my last article. Then I’ll get into something else, something dangerous that a Federal Judge knows nothing about…

    Federal Judge Dana Sabraw is overseeing a lawsuit against mandatory vaccination in California.

    So far, Sabraw has denied a petition to suspend mandatory vaccination for school children while the case moves forward.

    He believes tradition and history are on the side of forced vaccinations. That’s because he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Or he’s just making it up out of thin air.

    As the LA Times reports: ““U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego wrote that state Legislatures have ‘a long history of requiring children to be vaccinated as a condition to school enrollment, and for as many years, both state and federal courts have upheld those requirements against constitutional challenge’.”

    I don’t see how Judge Sabraw’s opinion could be more ridiculous.

    Why? Because ‘the long history’ he refers to is quite different.

    The states have always upheld exemptions from vaccination on several grounds: medical waiver, religious objection, philosophical objection. Hello? THAT’S the tradition.

    SB277, the new CA law, goes against the tradition, to say the very least. SB277 breaks new ground in allowing the state to operate as a medical fascist in the area of vaccinations.

    So…let’s look at one of the mandatory vaccines that’ll be injected into children in California, whether their parents agree or not. I’m talking about the DTP shot—diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough). Let’s give Judge Sabraw a history lesson. You know: actual history.

    Buckle up.

    “Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” (DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich)

    “… Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more [all signs of acute and very serious neurological reaction].” (Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987)

    “A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used).” (Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987)

    “…in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.” (Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370)

    “… Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored.” (Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217)

    “Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” (Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58)

    “Pertussis (whooping cough) immunization is controversial, as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity. The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects… annual deaths, per million children, from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies, shows that from a high point of just under 900 deaths per million children (under age 15) in 1905, the decline has been consistent and dramatic. There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80% by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale, in the mid-nineteen fifties. The decline has continued, albeit at a slower rate, ever since. No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use.” (Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 63)

    Again, the DPT shot will be required and mandatory in California for school children.

    It helps to know history, especially since major media refuse to touch the truth with a ten-foot pole.

    Shoot your child up with the DPT vaccine?

    Go along to get along?

    Bury your head in the sand?

    Share this:
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (28th August 2016), Houman (28th August 2016), Paul (29th August 2016), william r sanford72 (29th August 2016)

  37. Link to Post #59
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    New Scientific Consensus: Toxins increase risk for autism
    From Autism Action Network 8/29/16

    Take action: http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/ale...25641&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]

    Quote A wide-ranging group of leading scientists from dozens of research institutions in the US, federal agencies and associations of medical professionals have released a simple but powerful statement, “Widespread exposures to toxic chemicals in our air, water, food, soil, and consumer products can increase the risks for cognitive, behavioral, or social impairment, as well as specific neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).”

    Of course, parents of neurologically-damaged children have been saying this for decades. The report was released on the Friday before the July Fourth weekend, a day guaranteed to provide no media coverage. Consequently, it is up to us to get this information to federal and state legislators. Please click on the Take Action Link above to send to your legislators a message that contains a link to the report.

    The full statement was published in the journal Environmental Health Risks. Please read it here: http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/EHP358/

    Six toxins were specifically identified: MERCURY, organophophate pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), lead, Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) used as flame retardants, and combustion-related air pollutants, which include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter.

    The consensus statement provides a powerful challenge to popular theories about the cause of autism and related disorders such as it is primarily determined by genetics, or that it is a normal, naturally occurring difference.

    The researchers identify themselves as TENDR, Targeting Environmental Neuro-Developmental Risk. Signers include researchers from the MIND Institute at UC Davis, UC Berkeley, UCLA, Johns Hopkins, Columbia, Harvard, UNC, North Carolina State, U of Colorado, Rutgers, Georgetown, George Washington U, Boston U, U of Pennsylvania, UC San Francisco, Simon Fraser U, U of Texas El Paso, U of Vermont, Case Western U, U of Rochester, U of Cincinnati, U of Illinois Champaign-Urbana, Drexel U, Emory U, U Mass Amherst, Icahn School of Medicine, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Child Neurology Society, Endocrine Society, International Neurotoxicology Association, International Society for Children’s Health and the Environment, International Society for Environmental Epidemiology, National Council of Asian Pacific Islander Physicians, National Hispanic Medical Association, National Medical Association, as well as federal agencies and advocacy organizations.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    william r sanford72 (29th August 2016)

  39. Link to Post #60
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,085
    Thanks
    26,981
    Thanked 47,475 times in 9,660 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    CDC Concealed Link Between Thimerosal and Autism for Over a Decade, Forced to Release Incriminating Documents
    http://wakeup-world.com/2016/06/22/c...ing-documents/
    Quote By Carolanne Wright

    Contributing writer for Wake Up World

    A long-held debate between pro- and anti-vaccination groups may finally be put to rest over the association between thimerosal — a preservative composed of 49.5% ethyl mercury used in numerous child and flu vaccines — and neurological disorders, particularly autism.

    For nearly a decade, biochemist Brian Hooker, Ph.d., has been petitioning documents from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in relation to the controversial preservative. After more than 100 requests, the documents were eventually released — and clearly showed thimerosal can in fact cause autism and other neurodevelopment disorders. But this isn’t the only study that demonstrates the brain and health harming nature of the compound.


    Toxicity of thimerosal no longer in question

    A study in the Journal of Toxicology from the Methodist Hospital Department of Neurosurgery in Houston, Texas, establishes thimerosal as a potent mitochondrial toxin in human brain cells. Researchers found thimerosal-derived ethyl mercury not only inhibited mitochondrial function, but also increased the formation of potent brain-damaging oxidants. The authors conclude: “The results of this study suggest that ethyl mercury is a mitochondrial toxin in human astrocytes [cells associated with neurons in the central nervous system]. We believe that this finding is important, particularly since the number of diseases in which mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated are rapidly increasing.”

    Additionally, Sharon E. Jacob, M.D., and Ran Huo, B.S. write:

    “The main concern with thimerosal involves its metabolite — ethyl mercury. Hat makers, or “hatters” in the 1800s, were notorious for suffering from dementias due to the mercury nitrate used in felt processing. This mercury-associated dementia in felt workers was the inspiration for the Mad Hatter in Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland and the origin of the phrase “mad as a hatter”. The Mad Hatter’s disease, also known as erythrism, includes a constellation of dementia, stomatitis, muscle spasm, tremor and skin rashes. … Acute or chronic exposure to organic and inorganic mercury can result in renal, neurologic and dermal toxicity.” [source]

    According to findings by Dr. Paul King, ethyl mercury (thimerosal) is metabolized by the body into methyl mercury — the most dangerous and deadly form as it’s retained in bodily tissue and poses long-term toxicity issues.

    Over 75 documents and studies demonstrate the adverse effects of thimerosal, many of which are related to irregularities in autistic children. As a mercury-containing compound, thimerosal is a recognized human carcinogen, damages the immune system, can cause anaphylactic shock and is a known reproductive and fetal toxin.

    Safety issues of thimerosal caught the attention of the U.S. government and, in November 1997, Congress passed the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, which required an investigation into the mercury content of FDA-approved products. Because of this, previously unrecognized levels of ethyl mercury in vaccines were brought to light.

    In July 1999, health officials announced the compound would be phased out of vaccines. The CDC, American Academy of Pediatrics and FDA all claimed the measure was simply a precaution. Vaccine manufacturers were asked to eliminate mercury from vaccines. The request was refused year after year.

    Which brings us back to Dr. Hooker’s mission to uncover the truth about thimerosal buried within the CDC.

    CDC Concealed Link Thimerosal Autism Decade, Forced Release Incriminating Documents - fb

    Officials knew in 2000 that thimerosal is associated with increased risk of autism

    Brian Hooker, PhD, PE, is an associate professor at Simpson University and specializes in biology and chemistry. He also has over 15 years of experience in the field of bioengineering. Throughout his career, he has published science and engineering papers extensively in peer-reviewed journals. Dr. Hooker’s son, who is now 19, was developmentally normal until after receiving thimerosal-containing vaccines as a child, where he subsequently regressed into autism. This experience began Dr. Hooker’s search for the truth behind thimerosal in vaccines and decade-long quest to review crucial data from a massive CDC study on the compound.

    Once Dr. Hooker obtained the documents in question, the link between autism and thimerosal was undeniable. The data covering over 400,000 infants born between 1991 and 1997 was analyzed by CDC epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten, MD, “proves unequivocally that in 2000, CDC officials were informed internally of the very high risk of autism, non-organic sleep disorder and speech disorder associated with thimerosal exposure.”

    Furthermore, PR Web notes:

    “When the results of the Verstraeten study were first reported outside the CDC in 2005, there was no evidence that anyone but Dr. Verstraeten within the CDC had known of the very high 7.6-fold elevated relative risk of autism from exposure to thimerosal during infancy. But now, clear evidence exists. A newly-acquired abstract from 1999 titled, “Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to thimerosal containing vaccine in first month of life” required the approval of top CDC officials prior to its presentation at the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) conference. Thimerosal, which is 50% mercury by weight, was used in most childhood vaccines and in the RhoGAM® shot for pregnant women prior to the early 2000s.”

    Congressman Dave Weldon, MD, also expresses concern over the study to Julie Gerberding, Director of the CDC, in the following letter:

    Dear Dr. Gerberding:

    I am writing to follow up on our conversation about the article (Verstraeten et. al.,) that will be published in the November 2003 issue of Pediatrics. I have reviewed the article and have serious reservations about the four-year evolution and conclusions of this study.

    Much of what I observed transpired prior to your appointment a year ago as the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). I am very concerned about activities that have taken place in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in the development of this study, and I believe the issues raised need your personal attention.

    I am a strong supporter of childhood vaccinations and know that they have saved us from considerable death and suffering. A key part of our vaccination program is to ensure that we do everything possible to ensure that these vaccines, which are mandatory, are as safe as possible. We must fully disclose adverse events. Anything less than this undermines public confidence.

    I have read the upcoming Pediatrics study and several earlier versions of this study dating back to February 2000. I have read various e-mails from Dr. Verstraeten and coauthors. I have reviewed the transcripts of a discussion at Simpsonwood, GA between the author, various CDC employees, and vaccine industry representatives. I found a disturbing pattern which merits a thorough, open, timely, and independent review by researchers outside of the CDC, HHS, the vaccine industry, and others with a conflict of interest in vaccine related issues (including many in University settings who may have conflicts). [Read more]

    And yet, the CDC still claims there is “no relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism rates in children,” even though the agency’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database shows high risk. Numerous public records also support these findings, such as this Congressional Record from 2003.

    Dr. Thomas Verstraeten, the scientist who conducted the study in question, left the CDC in 2001 to work for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), a vaccine manufacturer facing liability over thimerosal in their products.

    Article sources

    “Thimerosal neurotoxicity is associated with glutathione depletion: protection with glutathione precursors,” James SJ1, Slikker W 3rd, Melnyk S, New E, Pogribna M, Jernigan S. Neurotoxicology, 2005 Jan:26(1):1-8.
    “Thimerosal-Derived Ethyl mercury Is a Mitochondrial Toxin in Human Astrocytes: Possible Role of Fenton Chemistry in the Oxidation and Breakage of mtDNA,” Martyn A. Sharpe, Andrew D. Livingston,David S. Baskin, Journal of Toxicology, Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 373678, (http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2012/373678/)
    “Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccine in first month of life,” Verstraeten Thomas M. MD, NIP, Division o f Epidemiology and Surveillance, Vaccine Safety and Development Branch
    http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1175560-overview
    https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2...-PgE1011-3.pdf [PDF]
    http://www.prweb.com/releases/ASOT/Thimerosal/prweb11598819.htm
    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cdc-forced-release-documents-showing-knew-vaccine-preservative-autism/
    http://preventdisease.com/news/pdf/Thimerosal_Immune_System_Abnormalities.pdf [PDF]
    http://mercuryfreedrugs.org/docs/00mmdd_EISAbstractSubmission_IncreasedRiskOfDevelo pmentalNeurologicImpairmentAfterHighExposureToThim erosal-containingVaccine_.pdf [PDF]
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  40. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Houman (31st August 2016), william r sanford72 (29th August 2016)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 1 3 13 18 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts