+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 18 FirstFirst 1 9 18 LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 347

Thread: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

  1. Link to Post #161
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Altering human genetics through vaccination
    by Jon Rappoport
    June 26, 2018
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...h-vaccination/


    "The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has launched efforts to create a vaccine that would protect people from most flu strains, all at once, with a single shot.

    Over the years, I’ve written many articles refuting claims that vaccines are safe and effective, but we’ll put all that aside for the moment and follow the bouncing ball.

    Massachusetts Senator and big spender, Ed Markey, has introduced a bill that would shovel no less than a billion dollars toward the universal flu-vaccine project.

    Here is a sentence from an NIAID press release that mentions one of several research approaches:

    “NIAID Vaccine Research Center scientists have initiated Phase 1/2 studies of a universal flu vaccine strategy that includes an investigational DNA-based vaccine (called a DNA ‘prime’)…”

    This is quite troubling, if you know what the phrase “DNA vaccine” means. It refers to what the experts are touting as the next generation of immunizations.

    Instead of injecting a piece of a virus into a person, in order to stimulate the immune system, synthesized genes would be shot into the body. This isn’t traditional vaccination anymore. It’s gene therapy.

    In any such method, where genes are edited, deleted, added, no matter what the pros say, there are always “unintended consequences,” to use their polite phrase. The ripple effects scramble the genetic structure in numerous unknown ways.

    Here is the inconvenient truth about DNA vaccines—

    They will permanently alter your DNA

    The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research—the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

    “By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

    “’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

    “The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was three years ago.]

    “I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

    Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

    Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”

    Alteration of the human genetic makeup.

    Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, he will live with that change—and all the ripple effects in his genetic makeup—for the rest of his life.

    The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

    “Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

    Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

    This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun. Anyone and everyone on Earth injected with a DNA vaccine will undergo permanent and unknown genetic changes…

    And the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is re-engineering humans in far-reaching ways.

    The emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.

    The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.

    It means the right to preserve your inherent DNA."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (27th June 2018), Patient (27th June 2018), Paul (27th June 2018)

  3. Link to Post #162
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Flu-Vaccine Mandate for NYC Children Reinstated
    June 28, 2018 JOSH RUSSELL https://www.courthousenews.com/flu-v...en-reinstated/
    (THIS IS BAD!! )

    "The state’s highest court backed New York City health agencies on Thursday for mandating that children who attend city-regulated or school-based programs get a flu shot.

    The requirement, which goes into effect immediately, covers all children between the ages of 6 months and 59 months who are enrolled in preschools and day care centers licensed by the city.

    New York City’s Board of Health first passed the rule in December 2013, but a challenge by five parents led a Manhattan judge to issue an injunction against it. The board appealed to New York’s highest court after another panel of judges agreed in 2016 that the city did not have the authority to mandate vaccinations.

    Thursday’s reversal by the New York Court of Appeals was unanimous.

    “The board’s promulgation of the flu vaccine rules falls squarely within the powers specifically delegated to the department in New York City Administrative Code § 17-109, and the board’s actions did not violate the separation of powers doctrine,” Judge Leslie Stein wrote for the court.

    “Further, the flu vaccine rules are not preempted by state law.”

    Chief Judge Janet DiFiore joined in the 25-page opinion, as did Judges Jenny Rivera, Eugene Fahey, Michael Garcia, Rowan Wilson and Paul Feinman.

    Richard Dearing, who heads the NYC Law Department’s Appeals Division, celebrated the decision. “We are pleased with this unanimous decision, which recognizes the ‘very direct connection’ between the board’s flu vaccine rule and ‘the preservation of health and safety,’ and agreed that the rule is ‘squarely within’ with the board’s delegated powers and consistent with state law,” Dearing said.

    In a statement Thursday, New York City Health Commissioner Mary Bassett said: “This decision will help us protect more than 150,000 children in city-regulated day cares and preschools across the city.”

    When they filed suit in 2015, the five parents called the flu-shot mandate a “bold and gross violation of the separation of powers.”

    Denying that they are anti-vaxxers opposed to the science of vaccination, the parents insisted that they “provide and continue to intend to provide their children with all vaccines required by New York state law.”

    The city’s board has mandated smallpox vaccinations of minors since 1866 and has required other vaccines for children enrolled in city-regulated day care centers since at least as early as 1948, when it directed that children be immunized against diphtheria prior to admission.

    Aaron Siri, an attorney for the families with the Manhattan firm Siri & Glimstad, did not respond to request for comment Thursday afternoon."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Paul (30th June 2018)

  5. Link to Post #163
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Pharmaceutical and Medical Horrors
    Published on June 28, 2018
    http://drsircus.com/general/pharmace...086ea49517c6c8

    "Leslie Kenton ( https://lesliekenton.com/health/into...cal-terrorism/ )
    concludes, 'It’s little wonder that people are confused about where to go and what to do when they get ill. I personally hear all about this, because I mentor hundreds of men and women throughout the world. They become overwhelmed by the media propaganda and aggressive advertisements they see on television. Our medical industrial complex has turned into a bizarre conglomeration of misinformation, lies and deceptions designed to further the corporate agendas of Big Pharma, government regulatory bodies and mainstream medicine, with little regard for human wellbeing.'

    Where did all the madness (pharmaceutical terrorism) come from. Well we can go back to the beginning, and now see in the end 'Bayer-Monsanto, soon to be just Bayer, which owns 60% of proprietary seeds and 70% of agrochemicals in the world. There are a lot of industries that wreck havoc on our world. One just has to think of the biggest global banks and oil companies. Think plastics and now think of telecommunication companies that are lusting to bombard us with even more microwave frequencies via their rollout of G5. But there is one field that is much worse than all others: agro-chemicals. At some point, not that long ago, the largest chemical producers, who until then had kept themselves busy producing Agent Orange, nerve agents and chemicals used in concentration camp showers, got the idea to use their products in food production,' writes the Automictic Earth.

    Everywhere we go in modern medicine there are dangers that can ruin your life. Even safe procedures are dangerous. For example, 'When a doctor orders an MRI, it’s usually is to help detect or rule out something potentially life-threatening, or at the very least, something that could make you seriously ill. But, it’s recently come to light that this rather routine diagnostic test, meant to help you, can have devastating effects on your health.'

    Why are MRIs dangerous? It is not the frequencies MRI employs, it is the contrast agent that they often use. Gadolinium is a metallic element with magnetic properties. It is injected into about one third of patients getting an MRI, in order to enhance imaging. If your doctor has ever ordered an MRI with “contrast” for you, you were exposed to gadolinium. But most likely you had no idea you were being injected with a known neurotoxin, capable of inhibiting mitochondrial function (energy production) and causing oxidative stress.

    Bayer experimental drugs were tested on Auschwitz prisoners. One of the SS doctors at Auschwitz, Dr. Helmut Vetter, a long-time Bayer employee, was involved in the testing of Bayer experimental vaccines and medicines on inmates. He was later executed for giving inmates fatal injections. 'I have thrown myself into my work wholeheartedly,' he wrote to his bosses at Bayer headquarters. 'Especially as I have the opportunity to test our new preparations. I feel like I am in paradise.'

    When John D. Rockefeller interlocked his American-based international empire with that of I.G. Farben in 1928 'there was created the largest and most powerful cartel the world has ever known.' Not only has that cartel survived through the years, it has grown and prospered.

    Heroin, originally created by I.G. Farben, was outlawed in 1924 as a prescription drug in the United States."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (29th June 2018), KiwiElf (29th June 2018)

  7. Link to Post #164
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Well-regarded medical journal removes new study re greater cervical cancer risk linked to HPV vaccination
    by Lori Alton June 30, 2018
    https://www.naturalhealth365.com/cer...cine-2613.html

    "Human papillomavirus, the most common sexually transmitted disease, usually resolves on its own. In rare cases, however, HPV leads to cervical cancer. HPV vaccines, such as Gardasil, are touted by many mainstream medical authorities as a way to prevent cervical cancer. But, could the vaccination actually be having the opposite effect?

    A new study raising just this possibility was recently published in a well-regarded medical journal. Soon after, it was officially retracted by the journal’s editors – because the author, fearing repercussions from those opposed to any questioning of vaccines, used a pseudonym.

    Age-standardized incidence of cervical cancer in Sweden increased by 20 percent during 2014 and 2015
    In an article published April 30, 2018 in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (IJME), the author (who identified himself as Lars Andersson, of the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology at the prestigious Karolinska Institute in Sweden) pointed out that the Centre for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Sweden had noted in its annual report that there had been a substantial increase in incidence of invasive cervical cancer – especially during 2014 and 2015.

    The increase was shown to be most prominent among women aged 20 to 49 years, who were of an age to have received the HPV vaccinations.

    HPV vaccines were approved in Sweden in 2006 and 2007. Andersson notes that about 80 percent of the 12-year-old girls in Sweden were vaccinated in 2010, while 59 percent of 13- to 18-year-old girls were vaccinated through a “catch-up” program.

    In addition to suggesting that increased HPV vaccination rates were associated with an increase in cervical cancer, Andersson maintained that a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analysis of Gardasil in 2006 showed a higher risk of “premalignant cell changes” from the vaccine in certain groups that had been exposed to some HPV strains.

    After the article’s publication, however, there followed a somewhat whiplash-inducing chain of events.

    Journal editors confirm: Author faced possible repercussions
    A week after publication, the IJME editors removed any mention of the Karolinska Institute from Andersson’s article.

    In a published comment, the editors stated that they had made the deletion after being informed by the Institute that no one by the name of “Lars Andersson” worked there.

    At this point, the author had proceeded to make his real name known to the editors – under the premise of confidentiality.

    The editors stated that they had confirmed that the author had the “necessary qualifications, expertise and research experience” required for the article. They also confirmed that the author did, indeed, face a “credible threat of harm.”

    In addition, they reconfirmed the article’s conclusion – that there was “a possible association of the HPV vaccine with increased incidence of carcinoma cervix.” They also agreed with the author that more research is needed.

    The editors decided to retain the article.

    At this point, the entire editorial board – and other interested parties – began to second-guess the decision and questioned the wisdom of allowing the article to stand.

    Ultimately, the editors decided against tolerating the authorial deception – although they still assess the article as correct. On May 8, 2018, the IJME retracted the article, while continuing to call for more exploration on the article’s subject.

    Undeniable truth: Cervical cancer prevention vaccines are linked to harm
    Natural health experts say that human papillomavirus vaccines such as Gardasil and Gardasil 9 have been linked with a variety of adverse and potentially devastating effects, including premature menopause, severe ulcers, infertility, chronic pain and paralysis.

    Even the manufacturers acknowledge that Gardasil can cause redness, swelling and pain at the injection site, along with nausea and vomiting.

    Moreover, Gardasil and Gardasil 9 both contain aluminum as an adjuvant, or additional ingredient intended to make the vaccine more effective. Aluminum is a proven neurotoxin, with more than 1,600 peer-reviewed scientific documents attesting to its hazards.

    As if this weren’t alarming enough, HPV vaccines also contain polysorbate 80 – which is known to cause encephalitis, anaphylactic reactions and multiple sclerosis.

    Vaccine proponents say that there is ‘solid evidence’ that the HPV vaccine reduces the risk of precancerous and cancerous lesions in women. On the other side of the debate, critics point to adverse effects and possible increased cancer risk.

    So, while the controversy continues to rage, educating yourself as to the possible risks and benefits of vaccination clearly remains the best policy. In addition, no doubt, a trusted and knowledgeable integrative doctor can help you make an informed decision.

    Sources for this article include:

    IJME.in https://ijme.in/articles/increased-i...v-vaccination/
    ActivistPost.com https://www.activistpost.com/2018/05...ish-study.html
    NaturalHealth365.com https://www.naturalhealth365.com/hpv...asil-2467.html
    "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. Link to Post #165
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Zero Tolerance Vaccine Laws in America: Will You Defend Vaccine Freedom?
    Posted: 7/1/2018 National Vaccine Information Center
    https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-Ne...m_medium=email

    "Every July Americans celebrate the day in 1776 when we declared our independence from a monarchy and began to create a Constitutional Democratic Republic to secure liberty and justice for all. 1
    Today, we are witnessing the erosion of core values that our constitutional democracy was founded upon. One example is a public campaign led by the medical establishment to demonize and discriminate against anyone opposing zero tolerance vaccine laws that violate human rights in the name of public health. 2

    The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was historic acknowledgement by the US government that government licensed and mandated childhood vaccines can and do cause injury and death. 3 Four billion dollars in federal compensation has been paid to thousands of vaccine victims over the past three decades. 4

    The 1905 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v Massachusetts affirmed the authority of states to require healthy citizens to undergo smallpox vaccination during outbreaks of that deadly, high communicable disease. However, the Court also warned that vaccine mandates should not be implemented in a way that is “cruel and inhuman to the last degree.” 5 6

    Public Confidence in Vaccine Safety Declines, Public Debate Is Censored
    Today, all children in America are being required to get dozens of doses of vaccines, 7 whether or not the disease is deadly or high communicable, whether or not there is a disease outbreak, and whether or not a child is biologically at higher risk for being harmed by vaccination. 8 9 This is an inconvenient truth that nobody developing, licensing, recommending, administering or voting to mandate a growing list of vaccines wants to talk about. So, as more Americans have become aware of vaccine risks and failures, the government, industry and medical trade have enlisted the cooperation of mainstream media to censor the public conversation. 10 11 12

    It hasn’t worked. Recent surveys reveal that 20 percent of Americans think vaccines may be unsafe and 45 percent are not sure. There has been almost a 10 percent decline in public confidence in vaccine safety over the past decade. 13

    doctor1.jpg
    Medical Doctors Attack Anyone Questioning Vaccine Safety and Laws
    Now the conversation about vaccination has taken an ugly turn. 14 Prominent medical doctors and professors at leading universities are publishing articles in academic journals and are being quoted in media reports attacking the intelligence, emotional and psychological stability, and moral values of anyone who dares to question vaccine safety or vaccine laws. 15 16 17 18 19

    Men and women who become doctors are no more equal than anyone else in society and, yet, they are being given a free pass to track, profile, marginalize, coerce and call for segregation and criminal prosecution of fellow, citizens who disagree with them about vaccination. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

    Constitutional Democracy Values Individual Life and LIberty
    A constitutional democracy recognizes that the ultimate source of government authority is consent of the governed and that, although the majority rules, the natural rights of minorities are protected. 28 A constitutional democracy highly values the dignity and life of each individual. This core moral value is affirmed by laws that protect privacy, and freedom of thought, conscience and expression, and allow unsanctioned association between individuals without government coercion, which is the legal foundation for a civil and open society built on respect, tolerance and inclusion.

    values.jpg
    A constitutional democracy promotes fair and equal justice for all. So the authors of the Declaration of Independence rejected rule by an elitist ruling class of citizens who are considered to be more important and qualified to govern without the consent of those being governed. 29 The Bill of Rights in the US Constitution makes it clear that respect for the natural rights of individuals limits the power of the state. As Thomas Jefferson put it: “the minority possess their equal rights, which equal laws must protect, and to violate would be oppression.” 30

    Why, then, are we allowing an elite aristocracy of doctors and professors to bully people who disagree with them about laws that disempower parents and place an unequal vaccine risk burden on vulnerable children in the name of the public health? 31

    Two Laws in America Require Citizens to Risk Their Lives
    There are only two laws that require American citizens to risk their lives. The first is a federal law, the military draft, which requires all healthy male adults to risk their lives in a war declared by the government to protect national security. Adults objecting to a war for religious beliefs or conscience can obtain a conscientious objection exemption without being punished.32

    gavel.jpg
    The second is a state law requiring all healthy children to risk their lives in a war that doctors declared on microbes two centuries ago. However, unlike adults who are not punished for following their conscience and refusing to fight in a war to protect national security, parents can be punished for following their conscience and refusing to risk their children’s lives in a war to theoretically protect the public health. 33 34 State sanctions include segregation and loss of the unvaccinated child’s right to a school education or permitting pediatricians to deny medical care to children if their parents refuse one or more government recommended vaccinations. 35

    Two different laws that require healthy Americans to risk injury or death: one conscripting adults in what government clearly defines as an emergency military action; and the other conscripting children in a mandatory vaccination program that is not defined as an emergency military action but is operated like one.

    Vaccine Risks Not Being Shared Equally By All
    How many Americans understand that when legislators vote for no exceptions vaccine laws like the one adopted in California in 2015, 36 they vote to enlist children as soldiers in a war in which vaccine risks are not being shared equally by all?

    No two children are alike. Some children are genetically, biologically or environmentally more susceptible to being injured or killed by vaccines without warning. 37 38 To sweep this inconvenient truth under the rug so doctors don’t have to think about their moral duty to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths, the Centers for Disease Control and American Academy of Pediatrics have narrowed medical contraindications to vaccination so that now almost no health condition qualifies as a reason to grant a child a medical exemption. 39 40

    Since Congress gave doctors a broad liability shield in 1987 similar to the one they gave to vaccine manufacturers in 1986 to protect them from most vaccine injury lawsuits, 41 doctors no longer have to worry about getting sued for being militant enforcers of vaccine policies and laws that punish children for the genes they were born with and leave too many of them disabled and chronically ill for the rest of their lives.

    War On Microbes Conducted Like A Military Campaign
    The medical establishment’s war on microbes, which has no end in sight, has always been conducted like a military campaign. The Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) traces its history back to the US Marine Hospital Service, whose doctors had the power to segregate by quarantine and prevent immigrants sick with infectious diseases from disembarking from ships entering U.S. ports. 42

    doctor2.jpg
    Today, doctors employed by the U.S. Public Health Service wear military style uniforms, are expected to follow orders, and are promoted through a rank system similar to that of the U.S. Navy. 43 Supervised by a Surgeon General, who is technically a three star Admiral reporting to a four star Assistant Secretary of Health, the US Public Health Service is described as “an elite team of more than 6,700 full time, well trained, highly qualified public health professionals.” These health soldiers, along with other federal and state government health officials, work to maintain the public health.

    Zero Tolerance Vaccine Laws Lead to Tyranny
    But there should be limits placed on the authority that public health officials and their physician colleagues exercise in a constitutional democracy. They should not be given unchecked power to order parents to play vaccine roulette with their children’s lives and punish them for refusing to obey the order. 44

    My father was a decorated World War II veteran, a career Army officer and military historian. History teaches us, he said, that military campaigns should only be used in true emergencies to protect national security because militarization of civilian institutions inevitably leads to an authoritarian government and tyranny.

    liberty.jpg
    So when I see doctors aggressively lobby for enforcement of zero tolerance, no mercy vaccine laws that fail to respect biodiversity and force parents to risk their children’s lives in a war they cannot refuse to fight without being punished, I remember what he said. I think about how there is no human right more fundamental than the freedom to think rationally and follow our conscience when making a decision about whether or not to risk our life or the life of our child for any reason.

    Forced Vaccination Lobby Doubling Down in 2019
    The forced vaccination lobby backed by industry and medical trade is already making plans to double down and target multiple states in 2019 for removal of religious and conscientious belief exemptions, while also placing further restrictions on medical exemptions to vaccination. 45

    Will you stand up and defend vaccine freedom in America?

    I hope you will. I hope you will join with the tens of thousands of Americans who are registered users of the NVIC Advocacy Portal, which is an online communications network at NVICAdvocacy.org. We monitor, analyze and report on vaccine legislation pending in every state and make it easy for you to stay electronically connected with your own legislators so you can make your voice heard.

    Become a vaccine freedom advocate in your state and stand shoulder to shoulder with other Americans who care about protecting the core moral values and civil liberties defined in the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution.

    It’s your health. Your family. Your choice."

    More here:
    https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-Ne...m_medium=email
    References
    1 National Archives. America’s Founding Documents: Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights.

    2 Fisher BL. The Vaccine Culture War in America: Are You Ready? National Vaccine Information Center Mar. 8, 2015.

    3 Public Law 99-660. Title III – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. 42 USC 300aa. Nov. 14, 1986.

    4 Health Resource Services Administration (HRSA). Vaccine Injury Compensation Data. June 4, 2018.

    5 Jacobson v. Massachusetts. 197 U.S. 11(1905). Cornell University Law School.

    6 Fisher BL. Forced Vaccination: The Tragic Legacy of Jacobson v. Massachusetts. National Vaccine Information Center Nov. 2, 2016.

    7 NVIC. State Law and Vaccine Requirements. National Vaccine Information Center. 2018.

    8 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0 Through 18 Years, United States, 2018.

    9 Fisher BL. Blackmail and the Medical Vaccine Exemption. National Vaccine Information Center May 18, 2015.

    10 Carroll AE. Not Up for Debate: The Science Behind Vaccination. New York Times Sept. 17, 2015.

    11 Hodge JG, Campos-Outcalt D. Legally Limiting Lies About Vaccines. Jurist (University of Pittsburgh) Nov. 17, 2015.

    12 Caplan A. Revoke the license of any doctor who opposes vaccination. Washington Post Feb. 6, 2015.

    13 TVR Staff. Nearly 20 Percent of Americans Think Vaccines May Be Unsafe, 45 Percent Are Not Sure. The Vaccine Reaction June 18, 2018.

    14 Fisher BL. Class and Race Profiling in the Vaccine Culture War. National Vaccine Information Center July 17, 2017.

    15 Poland GA, Jacobson RM. The age-old struggle against the antivaccinationists. N Engl J Med 2011; 364(2): 97-99.

    16 American Psychological Association. Belief in Conspiracy Theories Associated with Vaccine Skepticism. APA Press Release Feb. 1, 2018.

    17 Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Fielding KS. The Psychological Roots of Anti-Vaccine Attitudes: A 24-Nation Investigation. Health Psychology 2018; 37(4): 307-315.

    18 Hendrix KS, Sturm LA et al. Ethics and Childhood Vaccination Policy in the United States. Am J Public Health 2016; 106(2): 273-278.

    19 Fentiman LC. When it comes to vaccines, rich parents get away with child neglect. Washington Post May 10, 2017.

    20 Fisher BL. Parents Deserve To Know More Than School Vaccination Rates. National Vaccine Information Center Sept. 8, 2015.

    21 Smith PJ, Chu SY, Barker LE. Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They Live? Pediatrics 2004; 114(1): 187-195.

    22 Fagone J. Will this Doctor Hurt Your Baby? Philadelphia Magazine June 2009.

    23 Bakalar N. Rich, White and Refusing Vaccinations. New York Times Dec. 24, 2015.

    24 Danziger PD, Diamond R. The Vaccination Double Standard. Slate July 25, 2016.

    25 Lipinski J. Endangering the Herd: The Case for Suing Parents Who Don’t Vaccinate Their Kids or Criminally Charging Them. Slate Aug. 13, 2013.

    26 Berezow A. Jail 'anti-vax" parents. USA Today Jan. 28, 2015.

    27 Karlamangla S. California doctor critical of vaccines is punished for exempting 2-year-old boy from all childhood immunizations. Los Angeles Times June 29, 2018.

    28 Center for Civic Education. Constitutional Democracy.

    29 National Archives. America’s Founding Documents: Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights.

    30 Jefferson T. Excerpt from First Presidential Inaugural Address (Mar. 4, 1801). Thomas Jefferson Foundation (Monticello).

    31 Fisher BL. Baylor’s Doc Hotez Bullies Parents of Vaccine Injured Children. National Vaccine Information Center May 10, 2018

    32 The National Peace Museum of Conscientious Objection and Anti-War Activism. The History of Conscientious Objection. 2006.

    33 Fisher BL. The Moral Right to Conscientious, Philosophical and Personal Belief Exemption to Vaccination. National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Oral Presentation May 2, 1997.

    34 National Vaccine Information Center. Cry for Vaccine Freedom Wall.

    35 NVIC. State Vaccine Legislation in America 2015-2017. National Vaccine Information Center Oct. 25, 2017.

    36 Richardson D. The Fallout from SB277: What Happens Next? National Vaccine Information Center Aug. 5, 2015.

    37 Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines. Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality. Evaluation of Biologic Mechanisms of Adverse Effects: Increased Susceptibility (p. 82). Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2012.

    38 Health Resource Services Administration (HRSA). Vaccine Injury Compensation Data. June 4, 2018.

    39 CDC. Vaccine Recommendations of the ACIP: Contraindications and Precautions. May 9, 2018.

    40 American Academy of Pediatrics. Medical Versus Nonmedical Exemptions for Child Care and School Attendance. Pediatrics August 2016.

    41 National Vaccine Information Center. NVIC Position Statement on the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. May 2018.

    42 DHHS. History of the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service.

    43 Collins C. The Public Health Service Commissioned Corps: Two Centuries and Counting. Defense Media Network Oct. 10, 2016.

    44 Fisher BL. From Nuremberg to California: Why Informed Consent Matters in the 21st Century. National Vaccine Information Center Oct. 24, 2017.

    45 Scutti S. Opting out of vaccines leaves these US ‘hot spots’ most vulnerable to outbreaks. CNN June 15, 2018.

    Last edited by onawah; 2nd July 2018 at 19:26.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  9. Link to Post #166
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Secrets of the vaccine cult
    Global vaccine cartel wreaks destruction: the evidence
    By Jon Rappoport
    7/2/18
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...ives-evidence/

    "Put these two public-health agency statements up against each other:

    DON'T GIVE THIS VACCINE TO PEOPLE WHOSE IMMUNE SYSTEMS ARE WEAK, BECAUSE DIRE CONSEQUENCES WOULD FOLLOW.

    WE GAVE THIS VACCINE TO 100 MILLION PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF WHOM HAD WEAK IMMUNE SYSTEMS, AND IT WAS A GLORIOUS SUCCESS, ONE OF THE GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE HISTORY OF MODERN MEDICINE.

    Doesn't add up, does it? Across a population of 100 million people, widespread harm and death would have occurred.

    Read on, and follow the inexorable logic.

    The FDA released a statement (8/28/17), about its crackdown on a California company pushing an unapproved treatment for cancer patients: stem cells mixed with a smallpox vaccine.

    But that's not the big story. The big story is buried in the FDA press release. Here is the Agency's statement:

    "Serious health problems, including those that are life-threatening, can also occur in...people who...have problems with their heart or immune system if they become infected with the [smallpox] vaccine virus, either by being vaccinated or by being in close contact with a person who was vaccinated."

    Get it? The FDA is admitting that those with certain prior health conditions who pick up the smallpox virus, as a result of vaccination, are at exceptionally high risk. AMONG THOSE PRIOR HEALTH CONDITIONS IS: "IMMUNE SYSTEM PROBLEMS."

    That simply means: weak and compromised immune systems.

    And yet...during the years 1966-1980, a massive smallpox eradication campaign was carried out in Africa, under the auspices of the World Health Organization. Roughly 100 million doses of the smallpox vaccine were given to Africans, MILLIONS OF WHOM ALREADY HAD SEVERELY COMPROMISED IMMUNE SYSTEMS.

    Their immune systems were compromised by hunger, protein-calorie malnutrition, starvation, contaminated water supplies, lack of basic sanitation---all the conditions that are part of generation to generation poverty.

    How much devastation was wrought by this smallpox vaccination campaign?

    The World Health Organization, in 1980, celebrated the eradication of smallpox on the African continent---but was that what really happened?

    Or was it this? The visible signs of smallpox receded, but people with already-compromised immune systems began dying in large numbers. (Is THAT what would soon be called AIDS?)

    The FDA, in the statement I quoted above, unwittingly implied what researchers have known for decades: the so-called smallpox eradication campaign in Africa was one of the most dangerous medical interventions in history.

    In the late 1980s, a respected biologist with close knowledge of the Africa eradication campaign, told me, off the record, that after the World Health Organization celebrated their "victory" in Africa, they held a very secret meeting in Geneva.

    At this meeting, it was decided that the smallpox vaccine they deployed in Africa would never be used again.

    I asked him why.

    Because it caused cases of smallpox, he said.

    So the African eradication campaign had a double effect. In some people, the vaccine caused smallpox, which it was supposed to prevent. In others, it wrought extreme devastation and death without giving the appearance of smallpox.

    More lies, more widespread destruction from the vaccine establishment.

    Need further proof? In 2001, out of nowhere, the US federal government announced there was a potential bio-terror threat: the use of the smallpox virus as a weapon. Therefore, vaccination clinics would be set up all over America, and "everyone" should show up and receive the smallpox vaccine. As encouragement, President Bush got his shot on national television.

    But then, even mainstream doctors and researchers began contacting reporters and telling them there was a serious problem: the dangerous vaccine could injure and kill people.

    The program was quietly allowed to fade out. The massive number of vaccination clinics never materialized. About a year after US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Tommy Thompson, had warned the country about the threat of a smallpox bioterror attack, he showed up to say he was recommending that cabinet members should NOT get the shot. And that was that. End of story.

    A national vaccine program canceled. Retracted. Buried. When do you see that happen? Virtually never.

    However, the smallpox vaccine was too dangerous.

    ---The same vaccine that was shot into the bodies of 100 million Africans."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Flash (3rd July 2018), Hervé (3rd July 2018), Paul (3rd July 2018), RunningDeer (3rd July 2018)

  11. Link to Post #167
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    72
    Posts
    27,723
    Thanks
    28,846
    Thanked 129,174 times in 20,635 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    [B]Secrets of the vaccine cult
    Global vaccine cartel wreaks destruction: the evidence
    By Jon Rappoport
    7/2/18
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2...ives-evidence/

    "Put these two public-health agency statements up against each other:

    DON'T GIVE THIS VACCINE TO PEOPLE WHOSE IMMUNE SYSTEMS ARE WEAK, BECAUSE DIRE CONSEQUENCES WOULD FOLLOW.

    WE GAVE THIS VACCINE TO 100 MILLION PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF WHOM HAD WEAK IMMUNE SYSTEMS, AND IT WAS A GLORIOUS SUCCESS, ONE OF THE GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE HISTORY OF MODERN MEDICINE.

    Doesn't add up, does it? Across a population of 100 million people, widespread harm and death would have occurred.

    Read on, and follow the inexorable logic.
    Aha - you beat me to it. I came to this thread to post this fine article by Jon Rappoport, only to find it's already here. Excellent !

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    onawah (3rd July 2018), RunningDeer (3rd July 2018)

  13. Link to Post #168
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    Cape Cod MA USA
    Posts
    1,406
    Thanks
    2,840
    Thanked 4,048 times in 1,048 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    I've been told that STATINS are safer today than they were in the recent past.

    Is that true? Or is this just 'Pharma.' saying this?

    Appreciate any info.

    ES
    Question Everything, twice or maybe trice..........

  14. Link to Post #169
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    I wouldn't believe that for a moment, especially if it was told to you by your doctor or someone who benefits financially from pharmaceuticals. If you read even a little of this thread, you will find there are a million good reasons whey they should not be trusted.
    Quote Posted by East Sun (here)
    I've been told that STATINS are safer today than they were in the recent past.

    Is that true? Or is this just 'Pharma.' saying this?

    Appreciate any info.

    ES
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    East Sun (4th July 2018), Paul (4th July 2018)

  16. Link to Post #170
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    The Boys Are Not Alright
    JULY 03, 2018
    https://worldmercuryproject.org/news...e-not-alright/

    By the World Mercury Project team

    "Over the past decade or so, the term “gender gap” has taken on a new and heretofore unimaginable usage. Instead of signaling pay gaps or gender differentials in voting patterns, “gender gap” now seems to be shorthand for male decline and weakness in domains as varied as education, employment and health. Referring to the novel Atlas Shrugged and its focus on “the motor of the world,” physician-author Leonard Sax suggests that “we may be living in…a time when the motor that drives the world is running down or stuck in neutral—but only for boys.”

    As children’s exposure to potent environmental toxicants has increased, boys appear to be shouldering a disproportionate share of the consequences.
    Boys incur excess risks, suggests a UCLA biobehavioralist, for a bevy of “psychoneurobiological” reasons, including differences in sex hormones and slower maturation of the “stress-regulating circuits of the male brain…in the prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal critical periods.” Boys also are more susceptible than girls to many toxins—and for a longer period of time. As children’s exposure to potent environmental toxicants has increased, boys appear to be shouldering a disproportionate share of the consequences.

    Falling behind from the start
    The press and bookstores are full of accounts of boys’ lacunae in education settings. In the U.S., boys have lower grades and lower grade point averages than girls, and male youth disproportionately fill the ranks of high school dropouts. In the U.K., a 2016 BBC report described the current generation of boys as “generation failed,” noting that the gender disparities start at the youngest ages, with boys “falling behind before they even get to school.” Young men who reach college age are significantly underrepresented on many university campuses compared to young women, to the point where upscale publications such as The Economist have reported a widespread perception that colleges are “relaxing” their admissions criteria to entice more male applicants.

    …about half of prime age men who are not in the labor force…may have a serious [physical, mental or emotional] health condition that is a barrier to work.
    Underperformance in the educational domain may be contributing to a historically unprecedented and “alarming” drop in labor force participation among prime age workers over age 25 that is particularly pronounced for men. Poor health is another factor. According to a 2017 Princeton University report, “about half of prime age men who are not in the labor force…may have a serious [physical, mental or emotional] health condition that is a barrier to work.” A national survey cited by the Princeton researchers found that 43% of prime age out-of-work men perceived their health as “fair” or “poor,” compared to only 12% of employed men. Men currently in their mid-20s and early 30s were born in the late 1980s and 1990s—the same time period when children’s health in the U.S. took a major nosedive.

    Good health harder to come by
    It is no secret that boys have been disproportionately affected by the epidemic-level developmental disabilities that plague today’s children. Autism, for example, touches more than four boys for every one girl, and boys ages 4-17 visit a doctor for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) more than twice as often as girls of the same age. In a study of children born premature and evaluated at school age, boys had a “higher prevalence of cognitive, neurologic, and behavioral deficits than girls,” leading the authors to recommend further study of “environmental-genetic interactions that might contribute to male preponderance of deficits.”

    Male “preponderance” is not limited to neurodevelopmental disorders but is also apparent for a range of other health conditions, including early-onset schizophrenia, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), childhood cancers and—prior to puberty—autoimmune conditions such as type 1 diabetes, Crohn’s disease and juvenile multiple sclerosis. For the latter, “the peak of the highest male bias often tends to be at approximately ages 2-6, the typical age of onset for autism.”

    …something scary is happening to boys today” and a toxic environment shares a large portion of the blame.
    Increasingly, researchers attribute these sex-specific disparities to boys’ greater vulnerability to prevalent environmental toxins from the earliest stages of development. Many of these toxic or excitotoxic substances—mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, monosodium glutamate, glyphosate and more—are present in the dozens of vaccine doses that U.S. children receive beginning prenatally and continuing as newborns, infants and young children. Moreover, there are a number of biologically plausible reasons why boys may be more susceptible to the toxins in vaccines. As outlined elsewhere by World Mercury Project, these include a tendency toward a greater neuroinflammatory response, including differences in microglial function, and a role for testosterone in enhancing and potentiating neurotoxicity.

    What’s in store?
    In 2007, the book Boys Adrift called attention to “the growing epidemic of unmotivated boys and underachieving young men” and the major decline in male resiliency observed since the late 1980s. In the words of one reviewer, the book’s premise is that “something scary is happening to boys today” and that a toxic environment shares a large portion of the blame. Although researchers may dispute the precise causes, there seems little room for doubt that reducing children’s exposure to environmental toxins—and establishing an independent agency that takes vaccine safety seriously—would be a good place to start to not only rectify this particular gender gap but help all children lead healthier lives."

    Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project. https://worldmercuryproject.org/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    East Sun (4th July 2018)

  18. Link to Post #171
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    72
    Posts
    27,723
    Thanks
    28,846
    Thanked 129,174 times in 20,635 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Quote Posted by East Sun (here)
    I've been told that STATINS are safer today than they were in the recent past.
    The very idea, intent and purpose of taking statins is wrong. Cholesterols are an essential compound for the body's well being. Suppressing them is harmful, in and of itself.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    onawah (4th July 2018)

  20. Link to Post #172
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    Cape Cod MA USA
    Posts
    1,406
    Thanks
    2,840
    Thanked 4,048 times in 1,048 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    Quote Posted by East Sun (here)
    I've been told that STATINS are safer today than they were in the recent past.
    The very idea, intent and purpose of taking statins is wrong. Cholesterols are an essential compound for the body's well being. Suppressing them is harmful, in and of itself.
    Thanks Paul.
    I did see David Ike's video on cholesterol last week. I just needed a second opinion on my cardiologist's 'learned' opinion. (conditioned opinion?)
    'My wife is a by the book' person that I have to deal with and I listen to all sides and am confused in so many things to do with health.

    And I have been studying holistic health for decades.
    Question Everything, twice or maybe trice..........

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    onawah (4th July 2018), Paul (4th July 2018)

  22. Link to Post #173
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    72
    Posts
    27,723
    Thanks
    28,846
    Thanked 129,174 times in 20,635 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Quote Posted by East Sun (here)
    I did see David Ike's video on cholesterol last week. I just needed a second opinion on my cardiologist's 'learned' opinion. (conditioned opinion?)
    'My wife is a by the book' person that I have to deal with and I listen to all sides and am confused in so many things to do with health.

    And I have been studying holistic health for decades.
    I have come to accept that what my friends, colleagues, and family might choose for health care will not be what I would choose now, or even what I might have chosen in the past.

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    East Sun (4th July 2018), onawah (4th July 2018)

  24. Link to Post #174
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    IF YOU VACCINATE In the first 6 years of life your child receives the following:

    "•17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
    •5,700 mcg aluminum (neurotoxin)
    •Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum(aborted cow blood)
    •801.6 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent)
    •23,250 mcg gelatin (ground up animal caucuses)
    •500 mcg human albumin (human blood)
    •760 mcg of monosodium L-glutamate (causes obesity & diabetes)
    •Unknown amounts of MRC-5 cells (aborted human babies)
    •Over 10 mcg neomycin (antibiotic)
    •Over 0.075 mcg polymyxin B (antibiotic)
    •Over 560 mcg polysorbate 80 (carcinogen)
    •116 mcg potassium chloride (used in a lethal injection)
    •188 mcg potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer agent)
    •260 mcg sodium bicarbonate (baking soda)
    •70 mcg sodium borate (Borax, used for cockroach control)
    •54,100 mcg of sodium chloride (table salt)
    •Unknown amounts of sodium citrate (food additive)
    •Unknown amounts of sodium hydroxide (Danger! Corrosive)
    •2,800 mcg sodium phosphate (toxic to any organism)
    •Unknown amounts of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (toxic to any organism)
    •32,000 mcg sorbitol (Not to be injected)
    •0.6 mcg streptomycin (antibiotic)
    •Over 40,000 mcg sucrose (cane sugar)
    •35,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
    •5,000 mcg urea (metabolic waste from human urine)
    •Other chemical residuals"

    (From the book, "What The Pharmaceutical Companies Don't Want You To Know About Vaccines" - By Dr.odd M. Elsner)
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Houman (5th July 2018)

  26. Link to Post #175
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    CDC vaccine science covers up giant conflict of interest
    7/5/18
    By Jon Rappoport
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/


    "If you wanted to buy a product...

    And the main safety-researcher of the product was the company selling it to you...

    Would you automatically assume the product was safe and effective?

    But you see, that's the just the beginning of the problem. Suppose the company's research was cited thousands of times in the press, as the authoritative standard of proof---and anyone who disputed that research was labeled a conspiracy theorist and a quack and a danger to the community and an anti-science lunatic.

    Would you begin to suspect the company had awesome media connections? Would you suspect some very powerful people were backing the company?

    This is exactly the situation with the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Read these two quotes:

    The government's Vaccine for Children Program (a CDC organization) purchases vaccines for about 50 percent of children in the U.S." (The Atlantic, February 10, 2015)

    "The CDC currently spends over $4 billion purchasing vaccines [annually] from drug makers..." (Health Impact News, October 24, 2016)

    However, the CDC is also the gold standard for research on the safety and efficacy of vaccines. It turns out an unending stream of studies on these subjects. And the results of those studies are dutifully reported in the mainstream press.

    Do you think, under any circumstances, the CDC would publish data showing vaccines are ineffective and dangerous? They'd be cutting their own throats.

    "Well, we spend $4 billion a year buying vaccines from drug companies, but guess what? These vaccines are often dangerous..."

    Every time you read about a CDC study on vaccines, keep this obvious conflict of interest in mind.

    When, in 2014, William Thompson, a long-time CDC researcher, publicly admitted he and his colleagues had buried data that would have shown the MMR vaccine increases the risk of autism, he was throwing a stick of dynamite into the whole CDC operation. He was also saying, in recorded phone conversations, that the CDC was lying about vaccine safety in other studies.

    This is why major media refused to cover or investigate Thompson's claims. This is why they spread a blanket of silence over his revelations.

    Thompson was threatening a $ 4-billion-a-year enterprise.

    The CDC is both a PR agency for, and a buyer from, Big Pharma.

    Speaking of PR, would you like to see an example of how the CDC promotes the yearly flu vaccine by lying egregiously about flu deaths in the United States?

    In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where "the experts" used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.

    Here is a quote from Doshi's report, "Are US flu death figures more PR than science?" (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):

    "[According to CDC statistics], 'influenza and pneumonia' took 62,034 lives in 2001---61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified."

    Boom.

    You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

    This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

    But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

    Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

    Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: "Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006)." These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

    This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.

    However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.

    In other words, it's all promotion and hype.

    "Well, uh, we used to say 36,000 people died from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it's closer to 20. However, we can't admit that, because if we did, we'd be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows...and, by the way, we'd be put in prison for fraud."

    The CDC must turn out a steady stream of outrageous lies about the need for vaccines. If they didn't, they'd have no way to justify the billions of dollars they spend every year buying the vaccines from drug companies.

    Since the sold-out major media won't connect these dots, I and others need to."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  27. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    boolacalaca (5th July 2018), Hervé (5th July 2018), Houman (6th July 2018), Paul (6th July 2018), Reinhard (6th July 2018)

  28. Link to Post #176
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Corporate media denies autism epidemic and vaccine safety issues
    Take Action here: http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/ale...id=11713973341

    "Darla Shine, the wife of Bill Shine, the recently appointed White House deputy chief of staff for communication, is under attack by the corporate media for her tweets expressing concern for the exponential growth rate of autism, especially among African-American boys, vaccine safety, and violent side effects of prescription psychoactive drugs, among other issues.

    Verizon's Huffington Post, Jeff Bezos's Washington Post, and Mediaite, owned by Abrams Media which is headed by Disney/ABC News Legal Affairs Anchor Dan Abrams, have all published attack articles on Shine in the past few days accusing her of racism, islamophobia, transphobia, sexism, promoting de-bunked medical theories, promoting sexual harassment, in short, every accusation they can drum up hoping something will stick in an effort to discredit her. Other outlets in the corporate media echo chamber are picking up the accusations.

    I know Darla Shine. She is not a racist, or any of the other nasty names being hurled against her. She is, however, very concerned about autism, and vaccine safety. And does anyone who pays any attention doubt that is the real basis for the attacks against her? Drug companies are the leading source of advertising dollars for the corporate media (as well as political campaign contributions.) And does anyone doubt that the goal here is to warn off anyone connected to the administration from stepping out of line?

    Please click on the Take Action link above to send a message to the White House and let the President know that you too share Darla Shine's concern about the catastrophic rise in the number of people with autism, now 1 in 36 American children according to the National Center for Health Statistics. And that you too are concerned about vaccine and pharmaceutical safety and want to see real action taken by the administration to protect our children from vaccine injury, and stem the exponential growth of the autism epidemic.

    Please share this message with friends and family, and post to social networks.
    -Lucy Cole"
    Last edited by onawah; 8th July 2018 at 03:37.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  29. Link to Post #177
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Compulsory Vaccination: Authoritarians Versus Parents?
    RonPaulLibertyReport
    Streamed live on Jul 3, 2018

    "Dr. Bob Sears has been put on "medical probation" in California for writing out an exemption letter for a mother who said her child had an adverse reaction to a vaccine. His career may be ruined because he listened to a parent rather than state-mandates vaccine schedules. He does not oppose vaccines, but believes there should be some flexibility in scheduling. Do we have a right to refuse medical treatments?"

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Paul (8th July 2018)

  31. Link to Post #178
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    New York City to Require Flu Shots for Preschoolers and California Moves to Eliminate Vaccine Exemptions for the Poor
    July 10, 2018
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a..._rid=361609942
    By Dr. Mercola

    "Story at-a-glance
    June 28, 2018, the New York Court of Appeals unanimously ruled the New York city health department has the right to require annual flu vaccinations for children attending child care and preschool
    June 26, 2018, the California state Senate Committee on Human Services passed AB 1992 on June 26 — a controversial bill that eliminates the personal belief vaccine exemption for families on welfare
    Recent research found infectious influenza viruses in the exhaled breath of people who had gotten seasonal flu shots and contracted influenza. Those vaccinated two seasons in a row shed a greater viral load of influenza A virus
    According to the researchers, study results suggest there may be an association between flu vaccinations and the promotion of lung inflammation and increased shedding of influenza A viruses via breathing
    Studies also show annual vaccination leads to reduced protection against influenza; each vaccination is likely to make you progressively more prone to getting sick from influenza
    By Dr. Mercola

    Recent events again highlight the need for Americans to stand up for their right to know, and freedom to choose, when it comes to medical risk taking. The New York Court of Appeals not only has given the nod of approval to New York City's health department requirement that all preschoolers must get annual flu shots, but the California legislature is also moving toward eliminating the personal belief vaccine exemption for families on welfare.

    Aside from the loss of the human right to informed consent to medical risk taking, these decisions are all the more incomprehensible considering the lack of scientific evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of annual flu vaccination from cradle to grave and one-size-fits-all vaccination policies and laws. Again and again, we see vaccine policy built on lobbying dollars without real concern for human health and welfare.

    Informed Consent to Medical Risk Taking Is a Basic Human Right
    As noted by National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) president Barbara Loe Fisher in her Independence Day commentary on zero tolerance vaccine laws,1 "Today, we are witnessing the erosion of core values that our constitutional democracy was founded upon. One example is a public campaign led by the medical establishment to demonize and discriminate against anyone opposing zero tolerance vaccine laws that violate human rights in the name of public health."

    Informed consent is a basic human right in which a person has the ability to voluntarily accept or reject a treatment or medical procedure, including use of pharmaceutical products, after being fully informed of all possible risks and benefits. According to the University of Washington School of Medicine,2 "The most important goal of informed consent is that the patient has an opportunity to be an informed participant in her health care decisions."

    It's a simple enough premise, but throughout history we've seen cases where informed consent was not only challenged but completely ignored, and this trend not only exists to this day, it has flourished in recent years, with cities, states and federal government pushing for mandatory vaccine laws with no ability to opt out. As noted by Fisher:3

    "There are only two laws that require American citizens to risk their lives. The first is a federal law, the military draft, which requires all healthy male adults to risk their lives in a war declared by the government to protect national security. The second is a state law requiring all healthy children to risk their lives in a war that doctors declared on microbes two centuries ago.

    However, unlike adults who are NOT punished for following their conscience and refusing to fight in a war to protect national security, parents CAN be punished for following their conscience and refusing to risk their children's lives in a war to theoretically protect the public health.

    State sanctions include segregation and loss of the unvaccinated child's right to a school education or permitting pediatricians to deny medical care to children if their parents refuse one or more government recommended vaccinations.

    Two different laws that require healthy Americans to risk injury or death: one conscripting adults in what government clearly defines as an emergency military action; and the other conscripting children in a mandatory vaccination program that is not defined as an emergency military action but is operated like one."

    New York City Gets Green Light to Require Annual Flu Vaccinations for Preschoolers
    Case in point, June 28, 2018, the New York Court of Appeals unanimously ruled the New York City health department has the right to require flu vaccination for preschoolers. The requirement was initiated in 2013 by city public health officials.

    Five families sued the health department in 2015 to have the requirement overturned and two lower court rulings agreed the city had overstepped its legal authority. This final decision by the Court of Appeals now cements the city's legal right to require flu shots for children aged 6 to 59 months before they're permitted to attend child care or preschool. In the decision, Judge Leslie Stein wrote:4

    "Undisputedly, there is a very direct connection between the flu vaccine rules and the preservation of health and safety. The rules challenged here do not relate merely to a personal choice about an individual's own health but, rather, seek to ensure increased public safety and health for the citizenry by reducing the prevalence and spread of a contagious infectious disease within a particularly vulnerable population."

    In response to the decision, New York City health commissioner Mary Bassett said:5

    "Vaccines save lives and are an effective public health tool to prevent the spread of disease. The severity of this past influenza season reminds us of how deadly influenza can be. The influenza vaccine is the best protection against seasonal influenza for everyone.

    Children who receive the influenza vaccine are less likely to get sick, less likely to need medical attention and less likely to die from influenza. This decision will help us protect more than 150,000 children in city-regulated day cares and preschools across the city."

    'Vaccine-Before-Welfare' Bill Moves Forward in California
    Meanwhile, the California state Senate Committee on Human Services passed AB 19926 June 26 — a controversial bill that eliminates the personal belief vaccine exemption for families on welfare. Already, welfare recipients are required by state law to be up to date on all government mandated vaccines or lose a portion of their welfare benefits.

    AB 1992, authored by Assemblyman Kansen Chu, improves access to the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKS) program — a public assistance program that provides financial aid and services — for families whose children are not fully vaccinated or have difficulty proving that their children have received the required vaccinations.

    Estimates suggest 4,000 families in California are not meeting the vaccine requirement for public assistance, and this bill would give families who want to vaccinate their children greater access to vaccination services.

    The bill also lowers the monthly penalty for not being fully vaccinated from $130 to $50, extends the time that families have to produce vaccination records from 45 days to six months, and grants county welfare workers access to medical databases to determine whether the child has received the required vaccines in cases where parents cannot produce the records.

    However, the bill also eliminates the personal belief exemption, which means welfare recipients would no longer have the legal right or ability to opt out of vaccine requirements. Candace Connelly testified before the committee, saying "her choice not to vaccinate her children shouldn't preclude her from receiving benefits."

    According to a report by GV Wire,7 Connelly "objected to the 72 doses required in a child's lifetime, noting the potential for vaccine injury. 'Surely if parents have rights, one of them is to decide what gets injected into their children … I don't believe I should have money taken out of my benefits because I don't think that is a safe thing for my child.'"

    AB 1992 Moves to Senate Appropriations Committee
    Chu's reasoning for including this provision in his bill is that the personal belief exemption from vaccines to attend public and private school was already removed by SB 277 in 2015.8 According to Chu, removing the personal belief vaccine exemption for welfare recipients simply makes the bill "comply with current law."9 Sen. Janet Nguyen objected to the removal of the personal belief exemption.10

    Sen. Connie Leyva also objected, saying "I believe requiring proof of vaccinations in order for someone to receive their benefits is unfair and unnecessary. We should not be basing it off their need, and not off of vaccinations." Stefanie Fetzer, an advocate with Parents United 4 Kids, also commented:11

    "This is NOT a public health issue. Vaccination rates are high. There is no crisis mitigating such a heavy handed, totalitarian piece of legislation. Our legislators are testing the water. How far can they go? Can they withhold a parents' ability to feed their children if the parents are unwilling to ignore their religious or personal convictions? Why are our legislators targeting this poor, minority community?"

    Fisher, on behalf of the NVIC, has also spoken out against the bill, saying,12 "It is cruel to withhold welfare benefits from families in need. NVIC opposes AB 1992 and any legislation that threatens Americans with punishment for making voluntary vaccine decisions for themselves or their children."

    Despite objections, the bill passed 4-0 out of the Senate Committee on Human Services. Leyva did not vote and Nguyen was not present during the voting; the remaining committee members, Scott Wiener, Steven Glazer, Mike McGuire and Anthony Portantino, voted in favor. A seventh member, Tom Berryhill also was not present. Next, AB 1992 will be reviewed by the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

    Why the Lack of Concern for Vaccine Safety?
    In a series of articles, the World Mercury Project questions the apparent disinterest of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Immunization Action Coalition (IAC) in improving vaccine safety, choosing instead to engage in smear campaigns against anyone who questions the conventional dogma and who counters false vaccine safety claims with scientific facts:13

    "In the face of snowballing vaccine scandals — from fudged safety trials that use other vaccines as placebos, to persistent use of neurotoxic aluminum adjuvants, to the accelerated rollout of unproven vaccines that may be causing more problems than they solve — these and other vaccine advocacy organizations are not only turning a blind eye but are … beefing up public relations (PR) intended to stifle discussion …

    Due to the well-funded medical-pharmaceutical-media apparatus that endlessly repeat the mantra that ALL vaccines are safe for ALL people ALL the time, it is nearly impossible to get a fair hearing for common-sense questions about vaccine safety, no matter how urgent such questions may be."

    In addition to the AAP and IAC, the World Mercury Project also singles out three organizations that are closely allied with AAP, all of which "frame their aims in terms of cementing vaccine infrastructure and funding," according to the featured article:

    The 317 Coalition, whose members include vaccine manufacturers. The coalition's focus is to increase funding to Section 317 of the Public Health Service Act, the law that governs federal purchases of vaccines. Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and coinventor of a rotavirus vaccine, is on the steering committee, as are the executive director and chief strategy officer of the IAC
    Every Child by Two (ECBT), which promotes the mandatory use of vaccines to state and federal legislators, supports the elimination of all personal belief vaccine exemptions and generates "vaccine safety talking points." Here, Offit is on the board of directors
    The Adult Vaccine Access Coalition, the focus of which is to lobby for "necessary federal policy changes" to boost adult vaccination rates
    According to the World Mercury Project,14 " … [T]he AAP, IAC and … ECBT are among the leading actors propagating misleading assertions about vaccine safety. All three are also actively lobbying legislators to effectively jettison informed consent in favor of mandatory vaccines."

    Leading Vaccine Educators Are Bound by Conflicts of Interest
    The AAP, IAC and ECBT were also the focus of an investigative report into the partnerships between the CDC and non-profits promoting vaccines15 published in the British Medical Journal late last year. In the paper, "The Unofficial Vaccine Educators: Are CDC Funded Non-Profits Sufficiently Independent?" BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi wrote:

    "[S]urvey data have documented that parental concerns over vaccination safety and timing are common, even among those whose children receive all recommended vaccines.

    In 2015, a U.S. federal advisory committee warned that public confidence in vaccines cannot be taken for granted, and some prominent vaccine advocacy organizations are pushing for greater compulsion. But are these groups — which present themselves as reliable sources of information — providing the public with independent information?"

    The AAP, IAC and ECBT all receive funding from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and vaccine manufacturers. AAP is also on the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which determines which vaccines should be added to the childhood and adult vaccine schedules.

    At the same time, these three nonprofits are also actively lobby for legislation aimed at removing religious and conscientious belief vaccine exemptions from state vaccine laws, which has been successful in some states like California.

    This, despite the fact that federal law prohibits nonprofit organizations from using CDC or other federal agency money for lobbying efforts. According to Doshi, it's unclear whether the CDC's relationship with these three organizations has crossed into illegal territory, as he could not determine exactly how much money was received from the CDC and vaccine makers respectively.

    But, as noted by World Mercury Project, "It is clear that when these … nonprofits receive grant money from CDC, those grants free up other monies for lobbying purposes."

    Doshi also notes that "These groups are so strongly pro-vaccination that the public is getting a one-sided message that all vaccines are created equal … regardless of the circumstances." What's more, their inherent bias and financial ties with the CDC and vaccine manufacturers completely undermine their ability to appraise CDC vaccine recommendations.

    As it stands, there's no one to counter and cross-check those recommendations because everyone involved is on the same pro-vaccine team. The drug companies manufacturing and selling vaccines have no incentive to look at safety issues either, as this would merely cut into profits and undermine the partial product liability shield given to them by the U.S. Congress in 1986 and the total immunity from vaccine injury lawsuits handed to them by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011.

    Besides, 9 out of 10 of the world's leading drug companies spend far more money on marketing their drugs and vaccines than they do on research and development.16

    Flu Vaccine Allows Transmission of Disease, Study Shows
    Getting back to where we started, the notion that "the influenza vaccine is the best protection against seasonal influenza for everyone," is not supported by a large body of good scientific evidence. Recent basic science research into the shedding of influenza viruses adds yet another nail in the proverbial coffin of junk science that too often is used to promote seasonal flu shots.

    The new study,17 published in the journal PNAS January 18, 2018, found infectious influenza viruses in the exhaled breath of people who had gotten seasonal flu shots and contracted influenza. Those vaccinated two seasons in a row had a greater viral load of shedding influenza A viruses. According to the authors:

    "Our findings, that upper and lower airway infection are independent and that fine-particle exhaled aerosols reflect infection in the lung, opened a pathway for a deeper understanding of the human biology of influenza infection and transmission …

    Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend toward higher viral shedding in fine-aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year's seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models.

    In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons. Vaccination was not associated with coarse-aerosol or NP shedding. The association of vaccination and shedding was significant for influenza A but not for influenza B infections …

    Finding infectious virus in 39 percent of fine-aerosol samples collected during 30 minutes of normal tidal breathing in a large community-based study of confirmed influenza infection clearly establishes that a significant fraction of influenza cases routinely shed infectious virus … into aerosol particles small enough to remain suspended in air and present a risk for airborne transmission …

    The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation … If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies."

    Flu Vaccines May Do More Harm Than Good
    Here, researchers provide evidence for an association between seasonal flu shots and increased shedding of influenza A viruses via breathing. They also note that other studies suggest annual flu vaccination leads to reduced protection against influenza, which means each vaccination is likely to make you progressively more prone to getting sick. The question that remains to be definitively answered is: Are vaccinated individuals with influenza more contagious than unvaccinated individuals with influenza?

    Studies have also shown that getting flu shots makes you more prone to more severe respiratory illness (see below). Yet, New York City is willing to place all young children at risk for long-term complications from influenza vaccination — for what? To support the vaccine industry and meet a 100 percent flu vaccination rate for all children relentlessly pursued by public health department officials?

    The flawed mandatory vaccination ideology pays no attention at all to studies that provide mounting evidence that vaccines can cause acute and chronic illness while failing to work as advertised.

    The CDC and AAP direct doctors to give infants and children seasonal influenza shots starting at 6 months of age. Most studies find higher rates of health problems after just one or two flu shots. What's going to happen to the health of children as they grow up if they are required to get a flu shot each and every year, starting in the year they were born? This simply cannot be shrugged off as a question that isn't up for public discussion.

    A 2017 article in Science magazine18 delved into some of the finer points about individuality and how people's immune responses vary depending on a number of different factors, including the age at which you're exposed to influenza viruses for the very first time.

    That first exposure will actually influence how your immune system responds to influenza viruses for the rest of your life. Knowing this, what kind of adverse effects on healthy immune function might one expect when a child's first exposure to influenza viruses are vaccine strain viruses created in a drug company lab that atypically manipulate the immune system to produce artificial immunity? It's a gamble that no one has the answer to as of yet.

    Mounting Body of Research Questions Validity of Annual Flu Vaccination as a Public Health Measure
    Other studies have shown that:

    With each successive annual flu vaccination, the theoretical protection from the vaccine appears to diminish19,20

    A 2012 Chinese study21 found a child's chances of contracting a respiratory infection after getting the seasonal flu shot rose more than fourfold, and research published in 2014 concluded that resistance to influenza-related illness in persons over age 9 years in the U.S. was greatest among those who had NOT received a flu shot in the previous five years.22

    More recent research suggests the reason seasonal flu shots become less protective with each dose has to do with "original antigenic sin." Here, they found that influenza vaccine failed to elicit a strong immune response in most participants,23 which was explained as follows:24

    "What's at play seems to be a phenomenon known as 'original antigenic sin.' Flu vaccines are designed to get the immune system to produce antibodies that recognize the specific strains of the virus someone may encounter in a given year.

    These antibodies target unique sites on the virus, and latch onto them to disable it. Once the immune system already has antibodies to target a given site on the virus, it preferentially reactivates the same immune cells the next time it encounters the virus.

    This is efficient for the immune system, but the problem is that the virus changes ever so slightly from year to year. The site the antibodies recognize could still be there, but it may no longer be the crucial one to neutralize the virus.

    Antibodies produced from our first encounters with the flu, either from vaccines or infection, tend to take precedence over ones generated by later inoculations. So even when the vaccine is a good match for a given year, if someone has a history with the flu, the immune response to a new vaccine could be less protective."

    The flu vaccine can increase your risk of contracting other, more serious influenza infections

    Canadian researchers found that people who had received the seasonal flu vaccine in 2008 had twice the risk of getting sick with the pandemic H1N1 "swine flu" in 2009 compared to those who did not receive a flu shot the previous year.25 These findings were replicated in a 2014 ferret study.26

    Similarly, a 2009 U.S. study compared health outcomes for children between 6 months and age 18 who do and do not get annual flu shots and found that children who receive influenza vaccinations have a three times higher risk of influenza-related hospitalization, with asthmatic children at greatest risk.27

    The concept of heterologous immunity may account for these findings. Heterologous immunity refers to the concept that your immune system is directional, and that once you've encountered a pathogen, your body is better equipped to fight pathogens that are similar.

    However, in the case of influenza vaccines, this directionality appears to work against you. By learning to fend off certain influenza virus strains contained in the vaccine, your immune system becomes less able to fend off other influenza strains and disease-causing pathogens. As noted in a 2014 paper on heterologous immunity:28

    "Immunity to previously encountered viruses can alter responses to unrelated pathogens … Heterologous immunity … may be beneficial by boosting protective responses.

    However, heterologous reactivity can also result in severe immunopathology. The key features that define heterologous immune modulation include alterations in the CD4 and CD8 T cell compartments and changes in viral dynamics and disease progression."

    In other words, while influenza vaccine may offer some level of protection against the three or four viral influenza strains included in the vaccine, depending on whether the vaccine used is trivalent or quadrivalent, it may simultaneously diminish your ability to ward off infection by other influenza strains and types of viral or bacterial infections.

    Heterologous immunity is also addressed in a 2013 paper,29 which notes that "vaccines modulate general resistance," and "have nonspecific effects on the ability of the immune system to handle other pathogens." Researchers stated that:

    "… [O]ur current perception of the immune system is … simplistic. It was, to a large extent, shaped in the 1950s with the formulation of the clonal selection hypothesis.

    This line of thinking has emphasized the adaptive immune system and the specific antigen recognition and specific memory, which have been crucial in vaccine development, perhaps at the expense of examining cross-reactive features of the immune system as well as the memory capacity of the innate immune system.

    Although tens of thousands of studies assessing disease-specific, antibody-inducing effects of vaccines have been conducted, most people have not examined whether vaccines have nonspecific effects because current perception excludes such effects."

    Flu vaccine doesn't work well in statin users

    Statin drugs — taken by 1 in 4 Americans over the age of 45 — may interfere with your immune system's ability to respond to the influenza vaccine.30,31 After vaccination, antibody concentrations were 38 percent to 67 percent lower in statin users over the age of 65, compared to non-statin users of the same age.32 Antibody concentrations were also reduced in younger people who took statins.

    Flu vaccine does not prevent most types of influenza

    Independent scientific reviews have also concluded that flu shots have only a "modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost," and have no effect on complications of influenza.33,34 Moreover, the influenza vaccine fails to prevent influenza-like illness associated with other types of viruses responsible for about 80 percent of all respiratory or gastrointestinal infections during any given flu season.35,36,37,38

    Vaccination does not lower mortality in the elderly

    Research39 published in 2006, which analyzed influenza-related mortality among the elderly population in Italy associated with increased vaccination coverage between 1970 and 2001, found that after the 1980s, there was no corresponding decline in excess deaths, despite rising vaccine uptake.

    According to the authors, "These findings suggest that either the vaccine failed to protect the elderly against mortality (possibly due to immune senescence), and/or the vaccination efforts did not adequately target the frailest elderly. As in the U.S., our study challenges current strategies to best protect the elderly against mortality, warranting the need for better controlled trials with alternative vaccination strategies."

    Another 2006 study40 showed that, even though seniors vaccinated against influenza had a 44 percent reduced risk of dying during flu season than unvaccinated seniors, those who were vaccinated were also 61 percent less like to die BEFORE the flu season ever started.

    This finding has since been attributed to a "healthy user effect," which suggests that older people who get vaccinated against influenza are already healthier and, therefore, less likely to die anyway, whereas those who do not get the shot have suffered a decline in health in recent months.

    Flu vaccination during pregnancy raises your risk of miscarriage

    Research published September 25, 2017, in the medical journal Vaccine41,42,43 found that women who had received a pH1N1-containing flu shot two years in a row were more likely to suffer miscarriage within the following 28 days. While most of the miscarriages occurred during the first trimester, several also took place in the second trimester.

    The median fetal term at the time of miscarriage was seven weeks. In all, 485 pregnant women aged 18 to 44, who had a miscarriage during the flu seasons of 2010/2011 and 2011/2012, were compared to 485 pregnant women who carried their babies to term.

    Of the 485 women who miscarried, 17 had been vaccinated twice in a row — once in the 28 days prior to vaccination and once in the previous year. For comparison, of the 485 women who had normal pregnancies, only four had been vaccinated two years in a row.

    Vitamin D substantially outperforms flu vaccine

    In a 2014 analysis44 of the available research on inactivated influenza vaccines, the Cochrane Collaboration (which is considered by many as the gold standard for scientific meta-reviews) concluded that:

    "Injected influenza vaccines probably have a small protective effect against influenza and ILI [influenza-like illness] … as 71 people would need to be vaccinated to avoid one influenza case, and 29 would need to be vaccinated to avoid one case of ILI. Vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalizations … or number of working days lost."

    For comparison, a 2017 scientific review45,46 of 25 randomized controlled trials found the number needed to treat (NNT) for vitamin D is 33, meaning one person would be spared from acute respiratory infection for every 33 people taking a vitamin D supplement. This evidence suggests that vitamin D supplementation is, at bare minimum, more than twice as effective as the flu vaccine. Among those with severe vitamin D deficiency at baseline, the NNT was 4.

    Effectiveness of flu vaccine is typically below 50 percent

    February 16, 2018, the CDC published interim estimates of the 2017/2018 seasonal influenza vaccine's effectiveness for the U.S.47 The overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness against influenza A and influenza B virus infection associated with medically attended acute respiratory illness was 36 percent. Put another way, the vaccine did not work 64 percent of the time.

    More precisely, vaccine effectiveness is estimated to be 25 percent effective against the A(H3N2) virus; 67 percent effective against A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses and 42 percent effective against influenza B viruses. In 2015, a CDC analysis48 revealed that, between 2005 and 2015, the flu vaccine was less than 50 percent effective more than half of the time, so this year's low effectiveness rating (36 percent) was no great surprise.

    The Flucelvax vaccine introduced during the 2017-2018 flu season, grown in dog kidney cells rather than chicken eggs, was also a failure. Touted as a new-and-improved flu shot that would protect more people, FDA research found no significant difference between it and the conventional flu shot in protecting seniors.

    While flu vaccines overall had a 24 percent effectiveness in preventing flu-related hospitalizations in people aged 65 and older, the Flucelvax vaccine had an effectiveness rate of only 26.5 percent in that population.49

    Flu vaccine does not lessen influenza severity

    While health officials are fond of saying that getting a flu shot will lessen your symptoms should you contract influenza, a 2017 study50 by French researchers, which aimed to assess the veracity of such claims, found it not to be true. Looking at data from vaccinated and unvaccinated elderly patients diagnosed with influenza, all they found was a reduction in initial headache complaints among those who had been vaccinated. According to the authors:

    "Compared to non-vaccinated influenza patients, those who had been vaccinated had a slightly reduced maximum temperature and presented less frequently with myalgia, shivering and headache.

    In stratified analyses, the observed effect was limited to patients infected with A(H3) or type B viruses. After adjusting by age group, virus (sub)type and season, the difference remained statistically significant only for headache, which was less frequent among vaccinated individuals."

    Flu vaccine is associated with serious disability

    Permanent disability such as paralysis from Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is a risk you need to take into account each time you get a flu shot. As early as 2003, the CDC recognized the flu vaccine causes an excess of 1.7 cases of GBS per 1 million people vaccinated.51

    Data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shows GBS is the top injury for which people are receiving financial compensation through the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP), and the flu vaccine is now the most common vaccine cited by adults seeking a vaccine injury compensation award.52

    Shoulder damage is another risk, caused by improper injection technique.53,54,55 Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) includes chronic pain, limited range of motion, nerve damage, frozen shoulder and rotator cuff tears, and is typically the result of the injection being administered too high on the arm. This risk is particularly high when people get vaccinated outside of a doctor's office or other clinical setting.

    Many people getting flu shots in a public setting like a grocery store or pharmacy simply roll up their sleeves or pull down the top of their shirt, exposing only the upper part of their deltoid, thereby increasing the risk of getting the injection in the joint space rather than the muscle.

    GBS and SIRVA were both added to the Vaccine Injury Table in 2017.56,57 By adding those vaccine complications to the table, vaccine-related GBS and SIRVA cases brought before the "Vaccine Court" in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, D.C., will be more likely to receive federal vaccine injury compensation.

    In this lecture, immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych, Ph.D., author of "Vaccine Illusion: How Vaccination Compromises Our Natural Immunity and What We Can Do to Regain Our Health," explains how vaccines damage your immune function, which can result in any number of adverse health effects.


    Defend Your Vaccine Freedom
    Today, children across America are being compelled to get dozens of doses of vaccines. The flawed mandatory vaccination ideology turns a blind eye to the mounting evidence that vaccines can cause acute and chronic illness and fail to work as advertised. Americans need to stand up for their right to informed consent and freedom to choose when it comes to taking any medical risks.

    Thankfully, the non-profit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) provides the public with independent, empirically driven information on vaccines. They are tireless advocates for vaccine safety and are fighting to defend informed consent protections in the public health system. This charitable organization has been working since 1982 to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education. They provide information and counseling to those reporting vaccine reactions, as well as to advocate for the legal right to make vaccine choices.

    Help defend your vaccine freedom by donating to NVIC today. Your donation helps provide the public with life-saving information on informed vaccine decision-making, vaccine injuries and vaccine safety research. I’ll personally match your donations to NVIC for this crucial cause. Please consider donating to NVIC to help support their life saving mission and join the vaccine freedom of choice movement today."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Paul (10th July 2018)

  33. Link to Post #179
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    BREAKING: "MMR VACCINE KILLS TWO BABIES
    The HighWire with Del Bigtree
    Published on Jul 10, 2018
    "The Island Nation of Samoa is reeling. Officials have seized all MMR Vaccines, and ordered practitioners to cease use of the vaccine pending further investigation. HighWire reveals this is not the first story of tragedy in the tumultous history of the MMR #vaccine."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Houman (11th July 2018), Paul (11th July 2018), RunningDeer (26th August 2018)

  35. Link to Post #180
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,144
    Thanks
    27,081
    Thanked 47,687 times in 9,717 posts

    Default Re: The poisoning of America: Glyphosate, Statins and Vaccines

    Tom Frieden, former CDC director, has been arrested on sexual misconduct charges
    "Thomas Frieden. The man who sat on the William Thompson confession and blocked Thompson from testifying in the civil case of a child severely injured by his vaccines." The Canary Party

    Booked on sexual abuse charges.
    Frieden, who led the public health agency for eight years, was arrested in New York on Friday.
    By Brian Resnick and Julia Belluz Updated Aug 25, 2018
    https://www.vox.com/2018/8/24/177786...legations-nypd
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (26th August 2018), Flash (27th August 2018), Paul (26th August 2018), RunningDeer (26th August 2018)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 18 FirstFirst 1 9 18 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts