The New World Order Attempts to Hijack Anonymous – Sensationalism vs. Discernment

[ExomatrixTV]

ILLUSTRATION:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4jRuEkK61Dg

The New World Order Attempts to Hijack Anonymous – Sensationalism vs. Discernment

For example, the following statement is a quote from the organization that created the Humanity Party, apparently connected to Anonymous.

“Sovereignty is responsible for every war, bloodshed and terror that has ever inflicted humankind… Human beings must unite under one world government and constitution. Giving their voice and power to one government and one authority.”

The concept of sovereignty has been bastardized over the past 300 years, mainly due to the work of high level elitists such as Adam Smith and The Wealth of Nations, as well as Emer de Vattel and The Law of Nations.

Sovereignty, as it was defined and later used within the current international legal system, is essentially the right to rule over one group of people due to some kind of claim to power.

Monarchs usually refer to divine rights, whereas democracies point to founding documents like a constitution. Regardless of how a claim to rule was made the idea is that a government rules over the people, not the reverse. But this is antithetical to natural law and the realities of inalienable rights.

In other words, the sovereignty of nations, within this fallacious system, oppresses the people instead of servicing them, which is what government is supposed to do.

So on this score, the Humanity Party statement is valid; the current form of sovereignty we use today is a fraud, as no nation on Earth is truly de jure or by the people/for the people.

Related Trust Law: How You Became A Commodity - The Creation of Constructive Trusts ... "This power over us is, or is about to become, SLAVERY. We are squarely to blame"

However, true sovereignty is another matter.

"The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is a phrase written into the American Declaration of Independence. Within the document, it defines what inalienable rights are, that they are endowed by the creator, and that the individual, not a government is sovereign. Modern day legal systems pay lip service to this maxim of law while publicly renouncing individual sovereignty. But behind the scenes, this maxim provides the basis for the current system's claims to power.

A government or nation only exists because of the agreement of the people.

“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” – The Declaration of Independence says

Agreements or contracts have two forms of consent. Implied consent refers to someone not refusing an agreement, a form of acquiescence. This is how almost all nations on Earth today operate. The people do not question government, and act like they agree, therefore the government has the implied consent of the governed. This is what is called a de facto government. And while it is not overtly stated, the fact that governments must gain the consent of the people means that the source of national sovereignty is the individual. In other words, we know without question that individuals are sovereign by nature—although we can be deceived into thinking they are not.

In contrast, a de jure government gains consent of the people explicitly. A truly de jure government must gain agreement of each individual by their knowing, willing and intentional consent. Without this, a government subjects the people to its laws, which were never explicitly agreed to, and therefore, this body would be rightly called tyrannical. Almost all governments on Earth today are like this—de facto nations.

In order for a nation to be truly sovereign, it must be de jure. This means that the only power a government has is what the people give it by their knowing, willing and intentional consent. Within this lawful definition, everyone in a nation or country must issue their consent. If even one person's inalienable rights are trumped by a government—even though everyone else did consent to it—then that government has now fallen into tyranny.

So as you hopefully can see, the true meaning of sovereignty is very powerful.

This is why the Cabal have worked so hard to keep it hidden and ensure no nation on Earth is de jure and therefore truly sovereign.

Related Why You NEED To Understand the Occult | De-Mystifying the Occult Seminar - The Nature of Sacred Symbolism and Hidden Knowledge by Mark Passio

The Humanity Party seems to be calling for some kind of direct participation of the people in government and this sounds like a good thing; but there are some questions left to be answered.

As was mentioned, anyone who doesn't want to be governed must be respected. Unlike the fallacious version of democracy we have on Earth today—majority rule of might is right—an enlightened democracy honors the rights of the individual over the desires of masses. Will the Humanity Party be an enlightened democracy (more simply stated a republic)?

In the below article, the author interprets the meaning of a symbol on the Anonymous spokesman's chest, saying it resembles a Masonic compass:

There is an obvious similarity, but in the Masonic compass the angle of the down facing triangle is 90º, whereas the angle of the green triangle in the Anon video is more like 60º. I think the symbol for vortex mathematics is also a close match.



But the point I am making is that in our desire to seek the truth we should do well not to jump to conclusions without a valid cause.

To be clear, I am not promoting the Humanity Party.

My goal, as ever, is to help us all become better truth seekers so as to know reality first hand and be empowered as a result—the basis of self mastery and true sovereignty.

Related Universal Coherence, Sovereignty and Self Mastery | What Science is Telling Us About Earth’s Electromagnetic Fields and the Healing Power of Coherence

I personally think restoring the human family and uplifting each individual to be the best they can be is a lasting solution for all our woes. Perhaps this development could be a step towards a more free and prosperous society—I just don't know.

And really that's the only thing I am certain of that I don't know.

I wanted to highlight that as truth seekers and those trying to make the world a better place, we have to be discerning.

Discernment isn't about labeling something good or bad, without knowing why. We have to actually know the reasons for why something is beneficial or not, and those reasons should be based on the truth.

The Cabal know that people are busy that doing research requires time and energy, and that we want to fit in with the crowd. As such, it is very easy for them to steer public opinion simply by letting people's reactions run rampant. Groupthink or the tendency for people to think and believe what others do to the popularity of something is a risk for the awakening community.

As a final comment on this issue of the NWO hijacking anonymous, consider that the hacking organization is decentralized and grass-roots by nature—based on what we hear from spokesman and figures within it. These groups are very easy to infiltrate because almost anyone can become a member. Anyone can buy a Guy Faulks mask, record some videos and now be seen as a bonafide spokesman of Anonymous.

This means that the individual's capacity to discern and judge whether something is in harmony with the overall mission of an organization is essential to ensure the ideals within it are maintained.

In other words, individuals need to think for themselves, and not blindly follow what others tell them.

This is true for the present question as well.

And this is a skill we will need to develop more as we gain freedoms in life. We can't delegate thinking and judgement to someone else, for that's a central part of the problem that got us into this situation in the first place.

Related How the Cabal Maintains Their Power And What You Need To Do To Stop It - Un-Consent | Beyond BRICS: Exposing the Rats

There are many claims presented in the below article. Some are supported properly with evidence and arguments, whereas others are shared in a sensational way.

Keep in mind that in order to demonstrate a theory or perspective as valid, evidence and an argument are required. Without these things, it's just a sensational statement that can lead people into groupthink or blind belief.

This being said, there are many elements of the Humanity Party which should be questioned.

- Justin

~source:

http://sitsshow.blogspot.nl/2016/06/...ment.html#more

[ExomatrixTV]

~ILLUSTRATION 2:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dFgg0mS1Ono

¤=[Post Update]=¤ THE REAL DEAL:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=trzK4G4Rdm4

[ExomatrixTV]

ANONYMOUS FAKES EXPOSED. Humanity party (VOTEANONYMOUS2016) - ANONHQ - ANONYMOUS OFFICIAL

http://anonymous4justice.blogspot.nl...ity-party.html

[ExomatrixTV]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=u2Shupjz7TM

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vf3XPVHHpLc

[ExomatrixTV]

ILLUSTRATION:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yJRChZOrQhc

This video above is made by a network of Mormons pretending to be Anonymous and attempt to hijack Anonymous!

¤=[Post Update]=¤ Exposing Above Video:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ARdeQZFhBPE

[Richard S.]

The real deal is now here:

http://whatistheplan.forumotion.com/...-longer-active

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Lovespot (here)
The real deal is now here:

http://whatistheplan.forumotion.com/...-longer-active

~do not trust that link ... very annoying pop up too

[Richard S.]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by Lovespot (here)
The real deal is now here:

http://whatistheplan.forumotion.com/...-longer-active

~do not trust that link ... very annoying pop up too

No pop-up blocker?

Don't trust it, is up to you, I just wanted to provide some useful info...