+ Reply to Thread
Page 36 of 36 FirstFirst 1 26 36
Results 701 to 710 of 710

Thread: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

  1. Link to Post #701
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    71
    Posts
    27,723
    Thanks
    28,846
    Thanked 129,170 times in 20,634 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    ALSO BREAKING: New AG Bill Barr Will Prosecute Hillary & End the Mueller Probe he says- Bill Barr is the President’s right choice for the vaunted position since he has a history of running against the grain in order to enforce the rule of law – especially when it comes to treasonous & corrupt DC politicians.
    I have not however noticed any reliable sourcing for these other "ALSO BREAKING" details that InvestmentWatchBlog.com added to the above report of Christopher Steele's testimony, such as this statement that new Attorney General William Barr will prosecute Hillary Clinton or end Bob Mueller's "Special Counsel" investigations.

    InvestmentWatchBlog provides a link to an hour plus long Youtube video by "InspoNews - Federico Intelligence Report" as the reference for its report. This InspoNews report only asks (does not assert) at about the 47:22 mark, whether or not the nominated (not yet even confirmed or in office) incoming Attorney General (AG) Bill Barr will "look into this Christopher Steele lead".

    Without any further supporting evidence that I can find other than this one question by InspoNews, InvestmentWatchBlog asserts as fact that Barr "Will Prosecute Hillary & End the Mueller Probe" and will purse a specified list of seven high crimes and treasons by Bob Mueller, James Comey, and Hillary Clinton.

    The mere asking by InspoNews at about the 47:22 mark is way over hyped - keep barf bag in hand if you listen to it. But the extension by InvestmentWatchBlog of that one question into seven bold assertions of what Barr will, without any apparent evidentiary basis, or even any likely reality basis (it's too soon for even Barr to know for certain what he might do if and when he becomes the Attorney General, much less for him to let anyone outside some inner circle know) is, unfortunately, typical InvestmentWatchBlog click bait junk food for alt-media adicts.

    I have quit considering InvestmentWatchBlog (having clicked on way too many of their click bait headlines in the past) some time ago, and based on this one sample, I won't be adding InspoNews to the list of sources I track.

    ===

    The original source for the above linked stories regarding Christopher Steele's recent testimony in some British court seems to be the Anti-Trump dossier author was hired to help Hillary challenge 2016 election results (Washington Times) article (linked above in Post #700), and that is the only one of these articles or videos, outside of the Zerohedge article that restates this Washington Times article, that seems to be more based on evidence based reality, rather than click bait hype. The InspoNews video briefly displays and quotes part of the Washington Times article, at the 51:12 mark in the video, the Zerohedge article links to the Washington Times article, and the grossly inaccurate InvestmentWatchBlog article links to the grossly over-hyped InspoNews video.
    Last edited by Paul; 19th December 2018 at 00:03.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    Franny (19th December 2018), Hervé (19th December 2018), onawah (19th December 2018)

  3. Link to Post #702
    Avalon Member Satori's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,126
    Thanks
    4,562
    Thanked 7,280 times in 1,094 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    This article from RT posits that the Steele Russia election collusion dossier came about to provide part of the foundation for a Clinton challenge to the presidential election results if Trump won.

    https://www.rt.com/usa/446776-clinto...llenge-russia/

    To this story I would add that United States Supreme Court Justice, Antonin Scalia (1936-2016), was murdered by the Clinton crime family and Deep State in an effort to ensure that HRC's challenge to the 2016 pResedential [s]election would succeed.
    Last edited by Satori; 19th December 2018 at 22:59.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    onawah (20th December 2018), Paul (20th December 2018)

  5. Link to Post #703
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,716 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    Oh geeze.... this topic just got a huge boost

    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    avid (14th February 2019), Ba-ba-Ra (14th February 2019), Franny (14th February 2019), Hervé (14th February 2019), Ivanhoe (14th February 2019), onawah (16th February 2019), Paul (15th February 2019), Valerie Villars (14th February 2019)

  7. Link to Post #704
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,088
    Thanks
    26,983
    Thanked 47,483 times in 9,662 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    FBI-Clinton Email Corruption Scandals Exposed
    FEBRUARY 15, 2019
    Here's the story direct from Judicial Watch:
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...ndals-exposed/


    "FBI Covered Up Potential Violations of Law by Hillary Clinton
    As we watch the slow-motion coup against President Trump let’s not forget that at its heart is the Deep State’s desire to protect Hillary Clinton from the consequences of her illicit behavior.

    Now we have more evidence of their cover-up. We just received 186 pages of records from the Department of Justice that include emails documenting an evident cover-up of a chart of potential violations of law by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    We obtained the records through a January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit we filed after the DOJ failed respond to a December 4, 2017 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). Judicial Watch is seeking all communications between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page.

    The new emails came in response to a May 21 order by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton to the FBI to begin processing 13,000 pages of records exchanged exclusively between Strzok and Page between February 1, 2015, and December 2017. The FBI may not complete review and production of all the Strzok-Page communications until at least 2020.

    Three days after then-FBI Director James Comey’s press conference announcing that he would not recommend the prosecution of Mrs. Clinton, a July 8, 2016, email chainshows that the Special Counsel to the FBI’s executive assistant director in charge of the National Security Branch, whose name is redacted, wrote to Strzok and others that he was producing a “chart of the statutory violations considered during the investigation [of Clinton’s server], and the reasons for the recommendation not to prosecute…”
    [Redacted] writes: I am still working on an additional page for these TPs that consist of a chart of the statutory violations considered during the investigation, and the reasons for the recommendation not to prosecute, hopefully in non-lawyer friendly terms …

    Strzok forwards to Page, Jonathan Moffa and others: I have redlined some points. Broadly, I have some concerns about asking some our [sic] senior field folks to get into the business of briefing this case, particularly when we have the D’s [Comey’s] statement as a kind of stand alone document. In my opinion, there’s too much nuance, detail, and potential for missteps. But I get they may likely be asked for comment.

    [Redacted] writes to Strzok, Page and others: The DD [Andrew McCabe] will need to approve these before they are pushed out to anyone. At the end of last week, he wasn’t inclined to send them to anyone. But, it’s great to have them on the shelf in case they’re needed.

    [Redacted] writes to Strzok and Page: I’m really not sure why they continued working on these [talking points]. In the morning, I’ll make sure Andy [McCabe] tells Mike [Kortan] to keep these in his pocket. I guess Andy just didn’t ever have a moment to turn these off with Mike like he said he would.

    Page replies: Yes, agree that this is not a good idea.

    Neither these talking points nor the chart of potential violations committed by Clinton and her associates has been released.

    On May 15, 2016, James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey, sends FBI General Counsel James Baker; Bill Priestap, former assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division; McCabe; Page; and others an emailwith the subject line “Request from the Director.”
    Rybicki writes: By NLT [no later than] next Monday, the Director would like to see a list of all cases charged in the last 20 years where the gravamen of the charge was mishandling classified information.

    It should be in chart form with: (1) case name, (2) a short summary for content (3) charges brought, and (4) charge of conviction.

    If need be, we can get it from NSD [National Security Division] and let them know that the Director asked for this personally.

    Please let me know who can take the lead on this.

    Thanks!

    Jim

    Page forwards to Strzok: FYSA [For your situational awareness]

    Strzok replies to Page: I’ll take the lead, of course – sounds like an espionage section question… Or do you think OGC [Office of the General Counsel] should?

    And the more reason for us to get feedback to Rybicki, as we all identified this as an issue/question over a week ago.

    Page replies: I was going to reply to Jim [Rybicki] and tell him I can talked [sic] to you about this already. Do you want me to?

    A July 22, 2016, email exchange, among Strzok, Page, Moffa and other unidentified FBI and DOJ officials, shows that Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for several top Clinton aides during the server investigation, wanted a conference call with the DOJ/FBI and that she was “haranguing” the FBI/DOJ about the return of laptops in the FBI’s possession:
    A Wilkinson Walsh attorney, emails [Redacted] FBI National Security Division Officials: We wanted to follow up on our conversation from a few days ago. We would like to schedule a time to speak with both you and [Redacted] early next week. Is there a time on Monday or Tuesday that could work on your end?

    [Redacted] FBI National Security Division official emails: See below. I am flexible on Monday and Tuesday. [Redacted] can chime in with her availability. It is my understanding that Toscas [George Toscas, who helped lead Midyear Exam] may have called over to Jim or Trisha [former Principal Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson] regarding some high-level participation for at least the first few such calls. I am happy to discuss further but wanted to send you this so you could raise within the OGC [Office of the General Counsel] and give me a sense of scheduling options. I am around if you want to talk.

    ***

    [Redacted] FBI National Security Division official writes: In the meantime, I’ll tell Hal that we will certainly schedule a call and will get back to him as to timing. Since he knows Beth [Wilkinson] personally, it could be useful to have Jim on the phone if she is going to be haranguing us re: the laptops.

    [Redacted] FBI Office of the General Counsel writes: More…I guess this is [Redacted’s] rationale for why we need to have the GC on the call to discuss the fact that we will be following all of our legal obligations and FBI policies/procedures with regard to the disposition of the materials in this case.

    Strzok writes: You are perfectly competent to speak to the legal obligations and FBI policy/procedures. We should NOT be treating opposing counsel this way. We would not in any other case.

    In an April 12, 2016, email exchangeinitiated by an email from Strzok to [Redacted] within the Justice Department’s National Security Division (NSD), Strzok asks the NSD official if he’d like to add anything to the agenda of a meeting to occur three days later between FBI and DOJ attorneys.
    [Redacted] NSD official responds: Would like to see what you have on your agenda so we could see what we might want to add on our end. I will mention to [Redacted]. Also interested in understanding FBI OGC’s analysis of the privilege and ethics issues we are facing.

    Strzok forwards to Page: Pretty nonresponsive.…

    Page responds: Why provide them an agenda? I wouldn’t do that until you have a sense of how Andy [McCabe] wants to go. So no. We’ll talk about what we’re going to talk about and then they can talk about what they want to talk about. Also, seriously Pete. F him. OGC needs to provide an analysis? We haven’t done one. But they seem to be categorical that it’s just impossible, I’d just like to know why.

    And now I’m angry before bed again.?

    Total indulgence, there’s a TV in here. Here’s hoping I can find something to sufficiently melt my brain???

    Strzok replies: Because I want to make this productive! Why NOT provide them an agenda!?!? We all talk about what we want to talk about and that’s a waste of time.

    They haven’t done one either (legal analysis)

    Assume noble intent.

    How do we maximize this use of time?

    Page writes: I’m ignoring all this and going to bed.

    Strzok and Page were discussing a meeting that the Justice Department and FBI were about to have concerning, among other things, “privilege and ethics issues we are facing.”

    On July 12, 2016, Eugene Kiely, the director of FactCheck.org, emailedthe FBI about inconsistencies he’d identified between Comey’s congressional testimony and statements by Clinton and her campaign about her deletion of emails. Kiely noted that Comey testified to the House that Clinton did not give her lawyers any instructions on which of her emails to delete, whereas Clinton herself told the press that she made the decision on which emails should be deleted. Kiely also pointed out that Comey said in his testimony that there were three Clinton emails containing classification “portion markings,” whereas the State Department had said there were only two Clinton emails with classification markings. Kiely’s inquiry set off an internal discussion at the top of the FBI on how to respond to his questions.
    Strzok writes: “We’re looking into it and will get back to you this afternoon; the answer may require some tweaking, the question is whether this is the forum to do it.” The email is addressed to FBI intelligence analyst Moffa; Rybicki; Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired; Lisa Page and others.

    Strzok’s suggested press response is fully redacted, but included is his deferral to the “7thfloor as to whether to release to this reporter or in another manner.”

    When asked “should we provide any additional information to FactCheck.org or would any updates more appropriately be give [sic] directly to Congress?” Strzok defers to “Jim/Lisa [Page]” and [Redacted].

    In response to a March 29, 2016, article in The Hill, forwarded by Strzok to Page, reporting that Judge Royce Lamberth ordered limited discovery for Judicial Watch in its lawsuit against the State Department for Clinton’s emails(related to the Benghazi attack) – and thus opening Clinton up to possible depositions by Judicial Watch – Page responds simply: “Oh boy.”
    What this all means: We have caught the FBI in another cover-up to protect Hillary Clinton. These records show that the FBI is hiding a chart detailing possible violations of law by Hillary Clinton and the supposed reasons she was not prosecuted.

    Let us hope our new attorney general is paying attention.



    Docs Show State/FBI Bribery Scandal to Help Protect Hillary Clinton
    I have said before that untangling the knot of Deep State collusion in support of Hillary Clinton will take time, but we continue pulling the strands and getting results.

    We have now received 215 pages of records from the U.S. Department of Justice revealing Clinton/FBI connections. Former FBI General Counsel James Baker discussed the investigation of Clinton-related emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop with Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall. Baker then forwarded the conversation to his FBI colleagues.

    The documents also further describe a previously reported quid pro quo from the Obama State Department offering the FBI more legal attaché positions if it would downgrade a redaction in an email found during the Hillary Clinton email investigation “from classified to something else.”

    This batch comes thanks to the same Judicial Watch lawsuit described above for:

    All records of communications, including but not limited to, emails, text messages and instant chats, between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page;
    All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Peter Strzok.
    All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Lisa Page.
    On October 28, 2016, the day that Comey sent a letter to Congress regarding the FBI’s discovery that the Weiner laptop contained Clinton’s emails, Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall, within hours, emails Baker requesting a call “ASAP” about the Comey letter. Baker describes his follow-up call to senior FBI officials:

    I received the email below from David Kendall and I called him back. Before doing so I alerted DOJ via email that I would do that.

    [Redacted paragraph]

    He said that our letter was “tantalizingly ambiguous” and made statements that were “inchoate and highly ominous” such that what we had done was worse than transparency because it allows people to make whatever they want out to make out of the letter to the prejudice of Secretary Clinton.

    I told him that I could not respond to his requests at this time but that I would discuss it with others and get back to him.

    I suggest that we have some kind of follow up meeting or phone call with this group either this evening or over the weekend to address this and probably other issues/questions that come up in the next 24 hours. Sound reasonable?

    Baker’s heads-up on the Kendall call was sent to:

    Then-Director James Comey; since fired;
    Then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, who later replaced Andrew McCabe as deputy director;
    Michael Steinbach, the F.B.I.’s former executive assistant director for national security;
    Then-Assistant Director of Counterintelligence W. Priestap, now retired;
    James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey;
    FBI intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa;
    Former Acting Assistant Director Jason V. Herring;
    Michael Kortan,FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired;
    Former principal deputy general counsel Trisha Anderson;
    Strzok and Page
    The emails show that a conference call for the above senior officials was set up for the next day by Peter Strzok. (Two days before the election, on November 6, Comey sent a second letter reporting that the FBI’s review of the Weiner laptop material would not change his “conclusion” that Hillary Clinton should not be prosecuted.)

    On October 13, 2016, former FBI attorney Lisa Page sent an email, which apparently references a related Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit and further discusses a previously reported quid pro quo offer from the State Department:

    Jason Herring will be providing you with three 302s of current and former FBI employees who were interviewed during the course of the Clinton investigation. These 302s are scheduled to be released to Congress in an unredacted form at the end of the week, and produced (with redactions) pursuant to FOIA at the beginning of next week. As you will see, they describe a discussion about potential quid pro quo arrangement between then-DAD in IOD [deputy assistant director in International Operations Division] and an Undersecretary at the State Department whereby IOD would get more LEGAT [legal attaché] positions if the FBI could change the basis of the FOIA withhold re a Clinton email from classified to something else. [Emphasis added]

    The lawsuit also forced the release of a November 6, 2016, email by then-FBI official Peter Strzok telling Bowdich, Priestap, Rybicki, Page, former FBI General Counsel James Baker and others: “[Redacted], Jon and I completed our review of all of the potential HRC work emails on the [Anthony Weiner] laptop. We found no previously unknown, potentially classified emails on the media [laptop].”

    As we previously reported, there were at least 18 classified emails found on the Weiner laptop by the FBI. Paul Sperry’s RealClear Investigations report revealed that only 3,077 of the 340,000 emails “were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information.”

    The new records also include a September 2, 2016, email that Comey forwards containing a press release issued that day by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), in which Grassley criticized the FBI for not publicly releasing many unclassified records related to the Clinton email-server investigation, as demanded by Congress. In his cover note responding to Grassley’s charge, Comey tells his top aides, “To be great is to be misunderstood.” Page then responds with, “Outstanding.”

    On October 23, 2016, Strzok forwarded to Page and others the Wall Street Journal article revealing that Andrew McCabe’s wife had received a half million dollars for her Democratic state senate campaign. Page responded that the article “shaded or omitted or mischaracterized” facts “in order to get out the story [the reporter] wanted to tell.” She claimed the WSJ story was just “another depressing chapter in this whole post-investigation saga.”

    It is big news that, just days before the presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer pressured the top lawyer for the FBI on the infamous Weiner laptop emails.

    The media picked up on our finds. Here are some sample headlines. Fox News: “FBI’s top brass raced to handle Fox News inquiry on alleged quid pro quo over Clinton emails, new documents show,” and Daily Mail: “FBI’s infamous texting lover Lisa Page described ‘quid pro quo’ with State Department to trade more overseas staff for help downgrading ‘classified’ Hillary Clinton email.”

    These documents further underscore that the fix was in for Hillary Clinton. When will the Justice Department and FBI finally do an honest investigation of the Clinton email scandal?

    We’re not holding our breath on that. Last month, United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery can begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.

    Our discovery will seek answers to:

    Whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a non-government email system;
    whether the State Department’s efforts to settle this case beginning in late 2014 amounted to bad faith; and
    whether the State Department adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.
    These latest documents add to the growing evidence of malfeasance in the highest offices of the land to advance the cause of Hillary Clinton."
    Last edited by onawah; 16th February 2019 at 05:45.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (16th February 2019), Ba-ba-Ra (3rd June 2019), Hervé (16th February 2019), Valerie Villars (16th February 2019)

  9. Link to Post #705
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,088
    Thanks
    26,983
    Thanked 47,483 times in 9,662 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    Are The Clintons Involved In Human Trafficking?
    6/2/19
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/are...n-trafficking/

    "Check out this dynamite documentary short by emerging YouTube storyteller, Greg Reese, based on an article by Corey’s Digs, which details a timeline of Hillary Clinton’s involvements in children’s causes. It is very concerning if not damning.
    Reese reports that Hillary did her postgraduate study at Yale on children and medicine. Her work seemed to be focused on protecting children but in 1975, Hillary Clinton defended a 41 year old man for the violent gang rape of a 12 year old girl. After destroying the little girl’s reputation in order to win the case, Hillary not only bragged about getting her client a lighter sentence but she laughed about knowing her client was guilty.

    In 1999, she launched the International Center for Missing and Exploited Children with Richard Branson as a board member and with ties to the Podesta Group. ICMEC is a nonprofit supported entirely by private funds that claims to eradicate child abduction, yet the numbers of trafficked victims has skyrocketed since its inception. When ICMEC was founded, human trafficking was a $30 billion dollar a year business. Nine years later, human trafficking had grown to over $150 billion annually!

    In 2009, the Clinton Global Initiative launched the Polaris Project to run the National Human Trafficking Resource Center and Hotline. Also in 2009, AMBER Ready, Inc. selected Clinton Associates and the Podesta Group as their PR company. AMBER Ready’s cell phone technology creates a database of children across the globe, stored in cell phones.

    In 2010, Laura Silsby was arrested at the Haitian border with the Dominican Republic for trying to smuggle 33 children out of Haiti. Her lawyer, Jorge Torres was a fugitive and later convicted of trafficking children from Central America and Haiti into the United States. Bill Clinton got involved and Laura Silsby’s charges were reduced to “arranging irregular travel”. Silsby then returned to the US and became the vice president of marketing for AlertSense, a tech company that’s affiliated with the AMBER Alert system.

    A shocking number of Hillary’s associates at the Clinton Foundation have been convicted for the sexual abuse of children and child pornography. Convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein was part of the original group that conceived of the Clinton Global Initiative and flight logs show that Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private plane, the Lolita Express at least 26 times to travel to Epstein’s private island, where dozens of underage girls claim to have been trafficked for sex acts with Epstein’s powerful guests.
    NXIVM cult members, Clare Bronfman, her sister Sarah and Nancy Salzman were all members of the Clinton Global Initiative, which is by invitation only. NXIVM cult leader, Keith Raniere is currently on trial (and being found guilty) of sex trafficking, forced labor and pedophilia and the NXIVM cult was found to be illegally providing cash to Hillary’s 2008 presidential campaign.

    When looking at all this information, it is only natural to ask the question, “Are Bill and Hillary Clinton involved with child trafficking?” In looking at the various options at the end of her article, Corey writes, “They created bills, instilled laws, built relationships, worldwide databases, countless initiatives, partnerships, and global hotlines – all with direct access to, and knowledge of, children and their whereabouts. In both politics and business they are known as the procurement specialists, often using this language in their press releases.

    “The evidence is piling up against the Clintons. It’s becoming more and more difficult to rationalize all of their choices, relationships, and nefarious dealings, away.”

    ************************************************** **************
    Greg Reese
    May 13, 2019
    https://www.infowars.com
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (2nd June 2019), avid (2nd June 2019), Constance (3rd June 2019), Dennis Leahy (2nd June 2019), Elixir (3rd June 2019), Franny (2nd June 2019), Hervé (2nd June 2019), Kryztian (3rd June 2019), mountain_jim (6th June 2019), Paul (4th June 2019), silvanelf (6th June 2019)

  11. Link to Post #706
    Avalon Member Kryztian's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2012
    Location
    New Jersey USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,306
    Thanks
    7,577
    Thanked 8,663 times in 1,254 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    Thank you for this one onawah. I've been hearing little bits and pieces of info on the Clinton's and child trafficking and pretty much dismissed them all. But to see all of this information at once is quite overwhelming and concerning. Let's hope that more truth comes out.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kryztian For This Post:

    onawah (3rd June 2019), Paul (4th June 2019), silvanelf (6th June 2019)

  13. Link to Post #707
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,088
    Thanks
    26,983
    Thanked 47,483 times in 9,662 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    More very dark stuff (pedophilia, satanic rituals) the Deep State players are involved in, especially the Clintons.
    Clintons Center of Web, NXIVM, Branson, Gates, & More Names w/ Corey's Digs
    Sarah Westall
    Published on Jun 2, 2019
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    mountain_jim (6th June 2019), Paul (5th June 2019), Valerie Villars (2nd November 2019)

  15. Link to Post #708
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,088
    Thanks
    26,983
    Thanked 47,483 times in 9,662 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    Judicial Watch: Hillary Clinton was WARNED TWICE about Using Unsecure BlackBerry/Emails
    Published on Jun 5, 2019



    Read Judicial Watch's findings HERE
    http://jwatch.us/JB634j
    " ‘They had come from the campaign trail and they were … wedded to their BlackBerrys … They wanted to be able to have them at their desks where they were working, and they weren’t allowed to have that’ – Eric Boswell

    (Washington, DC)– Judicial Watch today released the deposition transcript of Eric Boswell, the former Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, in which he reveals that Hillary Clinton was warned twice against using unsecure BlackBerrys and personal emails to transmit classified material. A full transcript of the deposition is available here.

    Boswell, who was responsible for securing classified and national security information, stated that Clinton and her staff were “wedded to their BlackBerrys.” Additionally, he stated that he and other former State Department employees “were surprised” that Clinton used clintonemail.com to conduct official government business.

    In his deposition, Ambassador Boswell stated:

    Hillary Clinton and other Senior State Department officials were warned in 2009 that “any unclassified Blackberry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving emails and exploiting calendars.”
    Clinton was warned again in 2011 that “We also urge Department users to minimize the use of personal web email for business, as some compromised home systems have been reconfigured by these actors to automatically forward copies of all composed emails to an undisclosed recipient.”
    Clinton assured him that she “gets it” when he informed her about dangers of BlackBerrys.
    Clinton and her staff were “wedded to their blackberries” and wanted to continue using them in secure areas even after warning because it was a “convenience issue” to them.
    He and other former State Department employees “were surprised” to learn that Clinton used clintonemail.com to conduct official government business. Boswell claimed that they were not aware of such activity while still employed by the government.
    Boswell was deposed as part of the discovery granted to Judicial Watch by U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth in response to its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured, non-government email system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)).

    Judicial Watch was granted both depositions and written questions under oath of former Clinton aides, State Department officials, and others:

    Justin Cooper, a former aide to Bill Clinton who reportedly had no security clearance and is believed to have played a key role in setting up Hillary Clinton’s non-government email system;
    John Hackett, a State Department records official “immediately responsible for responding to requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act;”
    Jacob “Jake” Sullivan, Hillary Clinton’s former senior advisor and deputy chief of staff;
    Sheryl Walter, former State Department Director of the Office of Information Programs and Services/Global Information Services;
    Gene Smilansky, a State Department lawyer;
    Monica Tillery, a State Department official;
    Jonathon Wasser, who was a management analyst on the Executive Secretariat staff. Wasser worked for Deputy Director Clarence Finney and was the State Department employee who actually conducted the searches for records in response to FOIA requests to the Office of the Secretary
    Clarence Finney, the deputy director of the Executive Secretariat staff who was the principal advisor and records management expert in the Office of the Secretary responsible for control of all correspondence and records for Hillary Clinton and other State Department officials;
    Heather Samuelson, the former State Department senior advisor who helped facilitate the State Department’s receipt and release of Hillary Clinton’s emails;
    Monica Hanley, Hillary Clinton’s former confidential assistant at the State Department;
    Lauren Jiloty, Clinton’s former special assistant;
    E.W. Priestap, is serving as assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division and helped oversee both the Clinton email and the 2016 presidential campaign investigations. Priestap testified in a separate lawsuit that Clinton was the subject of a grand jury investigation related to her BlackBerry email accounts;
    Susan Rice, President Obama’s former UN ambassador who appeared on Sunday television news shows following the Benghazi attacks, blaming a “hateful video.” Rice was also Obama’s national security advisor involved in the “unmasking” the identities of senior Trump officials caught up in the surveillance of foreign targets;
    Ben Rhodes, an Obama-era White House deputy strategic communications adviser who attempted to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy;”
    Heather Samuelson, the former State Department senior advisor who helped facilitate the State Department’s receipt and release of Hillary Clinton’s emails;
    and one other person to be designated by the State Department.
    Judge Royce Lamberth ordered that the Boswell video be sealed.

    “Thanks to our court-ordered discovery, we now have confirmation that Hillary Clinton was warned by the top security official in the State Department that unsecure Blackberry and email use was a security risk, yet Hillary Clinton ignored these warnings,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

    In June 2017, Judicial Watch submitted evidence to Judge Sullivan showing that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly used an unsecure BlackBerry device despite being warned by “security hawks” against doing so.

    In a related case, in 2016, Judicial Watch took depositions from Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Patrick Kennedy, Stephen Mull, Karin Lang and Bryan Pagliano in connection to Secretary Clinton’s private email system: https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...e-huma-abedin/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (5th June 2019), Franny (23rd October 2019)

  17. Link to Post #709
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,088
    Thanks
    26,983
    Thanked 47,483 times in 9,662 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    JUDICIAL WATCH: NEW BENGHAZI DOCUMENTS CONFIRM CLINTON EMAIL COVER-UP
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...20191023203633
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Franny (23rd October 2019), Sammy (23rd October 2019)

  19. Link to Post #710
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,028 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: FBI quizzes Hillary Clinton on emails 2 July 2016 // Hillary Lied Under Oath.....

    US Justice Dept. Has Evidence of Clinton State Dept. Crimes

    From Lloyd (henrymakow.com)
    November 1, 2019

    "With a little digging you can find an evidence log-in-sheet that lists not five instances of crimes against children, but five computer folders of crimes against children."
    From Lloyd
    (henrymakow.com)
    [This info is from page 294 of the Inspector General's Report of the US Justice Dept. The IG was Michael Horowitz and the report was released in Spring 2018. As I said, it's online and you just have to google for the full report. There will be another report by Horowitz any day now and there will be criminal referrals. see also https://www.vox.com/2018/6/14/174489...n-emails-comey]
    With the death (perhaps) of Al Baghdadi, a number of reliable sources have stated that computers and documents were seized, including a large number of US State Department cables sent to Baghdadi.

    Fairly soon, these cables will be shown to the American public. The New York Times and others only tell the truth when they're forced into it.

    They will be unable to avoid it. Of course, this situation is akin to the case on page 294 of the Horowitz report. It shows the journal entries of Agent Randy Coleman memorializing what his agents saw on Anthony Weiner's computer. These entries include "Clinton Foundation" with the next line "Crimes against children."

    With a little digging you can find an evidence log-in-sheet that lists not five instances of crimes against children, but five computer folders of crimes against children.

    Yet, none of this has ever been acknowledged or discussed in any mainstream media platform.

    Similarly, the fact that ISIS is primarily the creation of Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, the CIA, the US State Department, and a raft of others is information that has been in the public domain for years.

    They're Defense Intelligence Agency reports that discuss in detail the genesis of ISIS. Judicial Watch has done a number of FOIA requests and produced documents that make the case unequivocal.

    General Flynn has stated that the use of ISIS to further the goals of the Deep State and others is "insanity."

    All of this has been out there but now it is likely to be thrust into the faces of the public in a form that is incontrovertible and irrefutable. Finally, finally, the 800 hundred pound gorilla of the horrors and atrocities of ISIS is going to have to be acknowledged.

    There is a possibility that Baghdadi is in fact still alive, and there is considerable evidence that he was or is a Mossad operative named Elliot Shimon, but the whole process of the raid will serve to put the origins and support structure of ISIS at center stage.

    --

    Lloyd adds:
    This is a war against evil and any person or venue that disseminates truthful information is doing God's work. I live on the Upper West Side of Manhattan and it is home to one of the largest assemblages of smart stupid people on the planet. The standard yenta responses to any real information that challenges their world view are "Oh, that's very Trumpian," or "How come this isn't in the New York Times?" and therefore it must be untrue, and the ever-popular " Well, we'll see." Yes, finally, we will.
    First Comment from Tony B-
    This guy is probably wrong in that this information will become public in a big way but the info is still online so those needing proof concerning FBI goings-on should go to this site: https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download


    Ken Adachi writes:
    It's always refreshing to read a story like this since we all want to see the triumph of Good over Evil, It would be nice if there were indictments, but I wouldn't hold my breath. At least they're putting it into official reports, so that's something.

    I don't think it's likely that any real indictments will come about against the major players since the Podesta and Weiner emails and Pizzagate go to the heart of the Deep State pedophilia agenda (mentioning Pizzagate is what ultimately brought Alex Jones down)

    Pedophilia and satanic murders is equally rampant in the UK where dissent and exposure is quickly dealt with (trumped-up imprisonment of whistleblower Sabine McNeill who played a significant role in the Feb 2015 exposure of "Papa Kills Babies" testimony videos -( http://educate-yourself.org/cn/detai...t04feb15.shtml ) of two young children, Gabriel and Alicia , who spilled the beans on satanic ritual murder (and cannibalism) of babies, in addition to sex orgies with children at schools and churches in upscale Hampstead, London but one is always hopeful that justice might prevail, at least occasionally.

    In reading Lloyd's article, which alludes to the emails found on Weiner's computer, it wasn't the NY state police or the Justice Department who revealed the contents of those emails to the public. It was JULIAN ASSANGE and his Wikileaks group that made this information known to the world in October of 2016 when Trump was running against Hillary for the US Presidency (and surely played an important role in helping Trump win), despite rampant election fraud by DemoRats.

    In fact, it was Julian Assange's posting of Weiner's and Hillary's emails that CAUSED the NY state police to go to Weiner's home and seize his laptops and take them into police custody, with their revealing emails on its hard drive. It wasn't a police investigation that led to seizing Weiner's laptops, it was JULIAN ASSANGE's investigations that led to it.

    And this from a guy who "Brabantian" (name of a Dutch dialect) tries to assure us - unconvincingly and ILLOGICALLY - that Assange is actually a Rothchild/CIA/Mossad agent who wasn't REALLY holed up in the Ecuador Embassy in London since 2012. No, he was actually out partying and running around with women and only showing up on the Ecuador balcony, once in a while, to make a statement and then it's back to the Wild Life with his MI5 and CIA pals!

    https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/11/a...rat-traps.html

    Yeah, right.


    Related:
    Last edited by Hervé; 2nd November 2019 at 14:11.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (2nd November 2019), Cara (3rd November 2019), Franny (2nd November 2019), Valerie Villars (2nd November 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 36 of 36 FirstFirst 1 26 36

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts