Geoengineering | They have NO Air Route but a Spray Plan

[Helvetic]

Geoengineering | They have NO Air Route but a Spray Plan

Source: Chemtrails Slovensko

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=q_948wP1KPg

[Helvetic]

CIA Director John Brennan admits to Chemtrails (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WBG81dXgM0Q

In a speech at The Council Of Foreign Relations on 29th June 2016, CIA Director John O.Brennan talks openly about Geoengineering.

Link to full transcript here: (This link will go to one of the CIA.GOV websites)

Director Brennan Speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations

[Fellow Aspirant]

[QUOTE=Helvetic;1089207]CIA Director John Brennan admits to Chemtrails (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WBG81dXgM0Q

In a speech at The Council Of Foreign Relations on 29th June 2016, CIA Director John O.Brennan talks openly about Geoengineering.


It is wrong to say that Brennan has admitted to Chemtrail use.

Looking at the transcript, I can find no admission on the part of Brennan that geoengineering is being used. He considers it an interesting option in dealing with global warming, but he is very careful to avoid saying that it exists.

Please don't get me excited by making such claims as someone of his stature "admitting" anything.

His words:


"Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.

An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.

As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.

On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI."

Brian