+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 46

Thread: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:55.

  2. The Following 33 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Alx (15th August 2016), Atlas (15th August 2016), Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), bluestflame (16th August 2016), BMJ (25th April 2017), Calz (17th January 2017), christian (15th August 2016), Chuck (5th September 2017), Cidersomerset (2nd September 2016), Daughter of Time (15th August 2016), Fellow Aspirant (15th August 2016), Flash (15th August 2016), fourty-two (16th August 2016), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Franny (16th August 2016), gord (15th August 2016), Hervé (18th March 2017), Inversion (14th August 2016), justntime2learn (15th August 2016), Mercedes (15th August 2016), NancyV (15th August 2016), Noelle (17th January 2017), onawah (24th March 2017), out in the open TI (10th August 2017), petra (15th August 2016), Savannah (15th August 2016), Sean (16th August 2016), seko (18th March 2017), Shannon (15th August 2016), Sunny-side-up (14th August 2016), syrwong (14th August 2016), Unicorn (2nd September 2016), william r sanford72 (15th August 2016)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:55.

  4. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Alx (15th August 2016), Atlas (15th August 2016), Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), christian (15th August 2016), Cidersomerset (2nd September 2016), Flash (15th August 2016), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Inversion (16th August 2016), justntime2learn (15th August 2016), Mercedes (15th August 2016), NancyV (15th August 2016), william r sanford72 (15th August 2016)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:55.

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Alx (16th August 2016), Atlas (15th August 2016), Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Cidersomerset (2nd September 2016), Flash (15th August 2016), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Inversion (16th August 2016)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    19th March 2016
    Posts
    1,735
    Thanks
    22,397
    Thanked 9,393 times in 1,630 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    In Michael Bell's book The Invisible Crime he chronicles the problems he's had with an array of horrific gang stalking tactics. One of the things he wrote about was something called a Slave or Robot Chip. From memory it's placed at the end of a probe then inserted into the brain through the nose. I presume they use imaging equipment to place it. I believe it's positioned on the Hippocampus or Hypothalamus and it literally turns the target into a robot/slave.

    There are images the Grays showed Jim Sparks during his abductions and most of them are of himself in past lives going back to the time when he was a primate. What I suspect is the Grays & Reptilians have been using Optic Nerve Transmitters for millions of years which turns a person into a mobile surveillance unit. It transmits whatever the wearer sees and sends it to a central hub possibly via entangled particles. In the last several decades terrestrial groups presumably have been using Slave Chips in conjunction with Optic Nerve Transmitters. Newer technology only requires a sample of a person's DNA to manipulate them.
    Last edited by Inversion; 15th August 2016 at 23:59.

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Inversion For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Cidersomerset (2nd September 2016), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Omni (16th August 2016), Victoria (7th March 2022)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:55.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Cidersomerset (2nd September 2016), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Inversion (16th August 2016)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    19th March 2016
    Posts
    1,735
    Thanks
    22,397
    Thanked 9,393 times in 1,630 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    Wow, it makes you think how did they deliver that device to your location. The book was the only placed the slave chip is mentioned to my knowledge. He also described them reading people thoughts and having it translated. A person could be sitting in a restaurant a couple of tables away reading your thoughts in text form on his cell. The scalar waves that emanate from our brains must be picked up by the cell towers then retransmitted. They can also delete thoughts you have which implies an AI.

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Inversion For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Cidersomerset (2nd September 2016), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Omni (16th August 2016)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:55.

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), bluestflame (2nd September 2016), BMJ (25th April 2017), Cidersomerset (2nd September 2016), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Molly4US (25th July 2017)

  15. Link to Post #8
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    63
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,637 times in 18,693 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    There are so many threads and many are connected that it is hard to keep track
    I watched this yesterday and posted it on another thread it is interesting....

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Voice of God Weapon, Synthetic Telepathy, Cybernetic Hive Minds MK Ultra
    This is not the Jesse Ventura show though it starts off with a segment from it.




    Published on 19 Feb 2016


    MUST SEE - (CHECK OUT) THE NEW (UPDATED VERSION) on my Facebook Page: Link Is Below:
    https://www.facebook.com/kevinscott88...
    - This video is about :
    EEG Cloning
    Bio Communications
    Mind Control MK Ultra
    DARPA Sonic Projector
    Silent Sound Technology
    Spying Nano Technology
    Remote Neural Monitoring
    Psychtoronic Weapons
    Voice of God Weapon
    Cybernetic Hive Minds
    Targeted Individuals
    Synthetic Telepathy
    Microwave Hearing
    Satellite Terrorism
    No Touch Torture
    New World Order
    Dr. Robert Duncan
    Jesse Ventura
    Alex Jones
    John Hall
    Schizophrenia
    Voice To Skull
    ELF Weapons
    Gang Stalking
    Conspiracy
    Illuminati
    ID Tracker
    Evolution
    X Files
    Spying
    DARPA
    HAARP
    Cloning
    V2K
    NSA Spying
    Edward Snowden
    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 2nd September 2016 at 16:17.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017)

  17. Link to Post #9
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    63
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,637 times in 18,693 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    Related topic from todays headline page more to do with
    electro and microwave pollution effects on our everyday
    lives.....

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Electromagnetic Fields And Their Effects

    By David on 2 September 2016 GMT David Dees Art, Medical/Health



    Electromagnetic Fields and Their Effects
    Posted on September 1, 2016



    ‘Can you see and feel its effects in the air? Of course you can, but you don’t know how
    to identify it correctly! It’s all around us like an ocean of electromagnetic frequencies that
    we are swimming in, which are pulsed out from many more sources than we can begin to
    imagine and, more confoundedly, not accept that they are causing damage to all living
    elements, especially young children who are most vulnerable.

    I’m talking about electromagnetic fields (EMFs) or radiofrequencies (RFs), which have become
    so ubiquitous that we haven’t stopped to realize what’s been happening to us—especially
    children exposed to Wi-Fi in schools—and how trees [4] and other plant life are being damaged.

    Where do these EMFs come from?

    Microwaves that are emitted by cell phone and mast towers, cell phones, AMI smart meters for
    electric, natural gas and water utilities, microwave ovens, and all ‘smart’ appliances that contain
    ZigBee chips, which are two-way radio transmitters operating using microwave technologies.’

    Read more: Electromagnetic Fields And Their Effects

    http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/09/...s-effects.html

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Omni (7th September 2016)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Avalon Member Enola's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th November 2015
    Posts
    310
    Thanks
    238
    Thanked 1,315 times in 279 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    I don't like to think about it, but I seem to have a lot of interference going on in my sleep. Not like aliens, but things displayed for me on a screen made to look like real life happens a lot, and other weird inexplainable things. I never have any feeling I'm in danger, it's more like something mischievous.

    I can also get attacks of strong negative energy when I'm awake if my aura is weak. Or it seems to come from the inside, but I have a suspicion it could come from the outside, because it makes me so drastically much more negative. A few times it has felt like I was being energetically stabbed in the heart, and for a moment I felt like I was going to die, before it stopped like someone had instantaneously intervened.
    Last edited by Enola; 2nd September 2016 at 16:37.

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Enola For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Molly4US (25th July 2017), Omni (7th September 2016)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:55.

  22. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Inversion (17th January 2017), onawah (17th January 2017), Shannon (17th January 2017)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th December 2016
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,660
    Thanks
    19,941
    Thanked 11,320 times in 1,632 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    Thank you for the video and info, Omnisense. I am a new member and just found your thread tonight. Up until last fall, I was clueless about mind control techniques. Now that I am aware, well, I am beyond blown away.

    Sometimes when I take naps in the afternoon and I reach that state between awake and asleep, I hear voices, though never images to go along with what I hear. A couple of years ago, I was in that between asleep and awake phase and heard very clearly, "Can you hear me?" It was a man's voice, and the words were said clearly and seemed to be external. I jerked back to the awake state and looked around the bedroom. No one was there. My husband was downstairs watching TV, so it definitely was not him. In another episode, I heard bits and pieces of a conversation, but the only thing I could recall hearing after jerking awake was "Dr. Divine." I used to think that I was tuning into some frequency that was allowing me to hear peoples' thoughts or conversations. I am not saying that I believe I am "targeted," yet it certainly makes me wonder.

  24. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Noelle For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Inversion (17th January 2017), Molly4US (25th July 2017), Omni (17th January 2017), out in the open TI (10th August 2017)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:55.

  26. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Inversion (17th January 2017), Molly4US (26th August 2017), Noelle (17th January 2017)

  27. Link to Post #14
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th December 2016
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,660
    Thanks
    19,941
    Thanked 11,320 times in 1,632 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    Hello, Omnisense. On V2k possibly being used on me, I can only guess at a reason. It really started happening after I began having conscious out of body experiences. Maybe it's related to that. If there is a way to monitor the population's non-physical (spiritual) experiences, perhaps it's to spook or distract people. So much to think and learn about ... thank you, again!

  28. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Noelle For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Inversion (17th January 2017), Molly4US (26th August 2017), Omni (17th January 2017)

  29. Link to Post #15
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:56.

  30. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Atlas (24th April 2017), Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (20th March 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Molly4US (26th August 2017), Noelle (18th January 2017), seko (18th March 2017)

  31. Link to Post #16
    United States Avalon Member Openmindedskeptic's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th March 2013
    Posts
    342
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 1,359 times in 313 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    If you listen to this interview with Doctor John Hall (Oct 12th, 2015) you realize he's right and that many of the recent mass shooters follow a similar pattern of hearing voices like the Florida airport shooter Esteban Santiago also did.



    Many were of the belief that the CIA created these mass shooters, via remote neural manipulation (mind control), during the Obama years to confiscate guns and undermine the Second Amendment. However, former Intelligence Agency workers I've spoken with suspect that the Deep State uses these horrific shootings as a 'strategy of tension' or fear inducing psychological warfare, if you will. I'm VERY curious to see if these mass shootings from self-identified Ti's will continue in to the Trump administration and if so how the new President will handle them.
    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer

  32. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Openmindedskeptic For This Post:

    Atlas (24th April 2017), Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (20th March 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Noelle (29th January 2017), Omni (29th January 2017), onawah (18th March 2017), seko (18th March 2017)

  33. Link to Post #17
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,392 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    deleted---
    Last edited by Omni; 3rd December 2018 at 16:56.

  34. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Alx (29th January 2017), Atlas (24th April 2017), Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (20th March 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), harmony_2 (13th February 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Noelle (29th January 2017)

  35. Link to Post #18
    United States Avalon Member Openmindedskeptic's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th March 2013
    Posts
    342
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 1,359 times in 313 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    Articles like this one seem specifically designed to undermine those claiming to be Ti's.

    United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers

    Without a credible advocate it's highly unlikely that anyone will ever take the Targeted Individual phenomenon seriously unless they themselves become a victim.
    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer

  36. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Openmindedskeptic For This Post:

    Atlas (24th April 2017), Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (20th March 2017), Foxie Loxie (10th August 2017), Hervé (18th March 2017), Molly4US (26th August 2017), Omni (19th March 2017)

  37. Link to Post #19
    France On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,891 times in 15,481 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    5G networks will use the same frequencies as pain-inflicting crowd control weapons

    Washington's Blog
    Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00 UTC



    No part of the country will be safe from ultra-high frequency signals.

    We previously noted that the Internet of Things (IoT) is a scam ... being pushed so that Big Brother can spy on us.

    Believe it or not, IoT may also pose health and safety risks.

    Devra Lee Davis - Founding Director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Founding Director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, who has taught at the University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, Dartmouth, Georgetown, Harvard, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and other major universities, and has had articles published in Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association to Scientific American, the New York Times and elsewhere - says that the 5G wavelengths used in IoT have never been tested for health effects, and may adversely impact our skin and sweat glands:

    Dr. Davis' group - Environmental Health Trust - explains:
    Israeli research studies presented at an international conference reveal that the same electromagnetic frequencies used for crowd control weapons form the foundation of the latest network - branded as 5G - that will tie together more than 50 billion devices as part of the Internet of Things. Current investigations of wireless frequencies in the millimeter and submillimeter range confirm that these waves interact directly with human skin, specifically the sweat glands. Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics, Hebrew University, Israel recently detailed how human sweat ducts act like an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths. Scientists cautioned that before rolling out 5G technologies that use these frequencies, research on human health effects needed to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected.

    ***

    [Dr. Davis notes] "This work shows that the same parts of the human skin that allow us to sweat also respond to 5G radiation much like an antenna that can receive signals. We need the potential adverse health impacts of 5G to be seriously evaluated before we blanket our children, ourselves and the environment with this radiation."

    Research studies from the Dielectric Spectroscopy Laboratory of the Department of Applied Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, headed by Dr. Yuri Feldman, indicate that millimeter and submillimeter waves may lead to preferential layer absorption. The number of sweat ducts within human skin varies from two million to four million. The researchers pointed to replicated peer research of these biological effects in laboratory research conducted in other countries and considered this mechanism of action well proven.

    Today's cellular and Wi-Fi networks rely on microwaves - a type of electromagnetic radiation utilizing frequencies up to 6 gigahertz (GHz) in order to wirelessly transmit voice or data. However, 5 G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves - to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation.

    ***

    For years, the U.S., Russian and Chinese defense agencies have been developing weapons that rely on the capability of this electromagnetic technology to induce unpleasant burning sensations on the skin as a form of crowd control. Millimeter waves are utilized by the U.S. Army in crowd dispersal guns called Active Denial Systems. Dr. Paul Ben-Ishai pointed to research that was commissioned by the U.S. Army to find out why people ran away when the beam touched them. "If you are unlucky enough to be standing there when it hits you, you will feel like your body is on fire." The U.S. Department of Defense explains how: "The sensation dissipates when the target moves out of the beam. The sensation is intense enough to cause a nearly instantaneous reflex action of the target to flee the beam."

    The conference at the Israel Institute for Advanced Studies at Hebrew University (IIAS) was organized in cooperation with the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the Environmental Health Trust (EHT).

    Verizon just announced that 5G networks will be tested in 11 U.S. cities. 5G Networks will involve the deployment of millions of antennas nationwide, thousands in each city, because millimeter waves cannot easily travel through buildings or other obstacles. Proposed installations have led to public outcry in residential areas where homeowners do not want antennas mounted at their yards or near schools.

    ***

    "There is an urgent need to evaluate 5G health effects now before millions are exposed. We need to know if 5G increases the risk of skin diseases such as melanoma or other skin cancers," stated Ron Melnick, the National Institutes of Health scientist, now retired, who led the design of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation.

    Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, Chief Editor of Radiation and Health, stated that the international organization - called ICNIRP - developing recommendations for public exposure limits of these higher frequencies was planning to classify all the skin in the human body as belonging to the limbs rather than to the head or torso. Leszczynski cautioned that, "If you classify skin as limbs - no matter where the skin is - you are permitted to expose it more than otherwise."

    "The use of sub-terahertz (Millimeter wave) communications technology (cell phones, Wi-Fi, network transmission antennas) could cause humans to feel physical pain via nociceptors, " stated Dr. Yael Stein, MD, who wrote a letter to the Federal Communications Commission about 5G Spectrum Frontiers.

    Additional resources include:
    Human Skin as Arrays of Helical Antennas in the Millimeter and Submillimeter Wave Range
    Research Study Summaries at Hebrew University Department of Applied Physics
    PDF of Abstract for January 24, 2017 IIAS Presentation
    Letter from Dr. Yael Stein to Federal Communications Commission on Spectrum Frontiers

    REFERENCES


    US Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program FAQS
    A Narrative Summary and Independent Assessment of the Active Denial System The Human Effects Advisory Panel
    Everything You Need to Know About 5G
    Potential Risks to Human Health from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems: Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD Video Lecture Presentation
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  38. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2017), BMJ (20th March 2017), fourty-two (19th March 2017), Foxie Loxie (19th March 2017), Inversion (30th June 2017), Molly4US (26th August 2017), Omni (19th March 2017), onawah (18th March 2017), out in the open TI (10th August 2017), seko (18th March 2017)

  39. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,681
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: The Invisible War: 21st Century Targeting

    California Cautions Cell Phone Users: Keep Your Distance
    By Bill Walker, Vice President and Managing Editor and Olga Naidenko Ph.D., Senior Science Advisor for Children's Environmental Health
    MONDAY, MARCH 6, 2017
    (A little good news on this particular front, for a change...)
    http://www.ewg.org/enviroblog/2017/0...m_medium=email

    Quote Under a court order, last week California public health officials released draft guidelines advising cell phone users to keep phones away from their bodies, use speaker phone and limit use. The guidelines, first reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, advise Californians that scientific studies have linked electromagnetic radiation from long-term cell phone use to an increased risk of brain cancer and other health problems.

    The advice itself is not surprising. Eight years ago, EWG published a review of the science on cell phone radiation, reporting studies by the World Health Organization that linked cell phone radiation to brain cancer, and other studies that linked cell phone radiation to diminished sperm count and sperm damage. EWG also published its own Guide to Safer Cell Phone Use, which you can find here.

    The California Department of Public Health had to be forced to release the guidelines by a lawsuit from a University of California, Berkeley, researcher and says the guidelines don’t constitute its official position, but this is a major development in the debate over cell phone safety. Public health officials in the nation’s largest state and largest cell phone market are acknowledging the need for caution, even as the cellular industry continues to insist there’s nothing to worry about and fights efforts to inform the public.

    Last year the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reversed course on its cell phone guidance, removing language that recommended caution and a section that addressed the increased risks cell phone use carries for children.

    CDC officials denied that they had been pressured by the cell phone industry. But public health advocates were suspicious in light of the industry’s legal fights against ordinances in San Francisco and Berkeley requiring phone stores to warn customers of potential health risks. The Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association won a court challenge to San Francisco’s ordinance, but Berkeley prevailed and its ordinance went into effect last September.

    The Chronicle said California’s draft guidelines were written and revised over the last seven years, but were never approved and released because the Department of Public Health feared “releasing them to the public would cause unnecessary panic.”

    But Joel Moskowitz, the University of California, Berkeley, researcher who sued the state, told the newspaper: “This could have perhaps saved some lives if it had been published by the department seven years ago … It’s disconcerting it has taken so long to issue this. And still, they are making it clear this isn’t their official position.”

    In human epidemiological studies, cell phone use has been linked to an increased risk of brain and salivary gland cancers. Studies from teams of scientists in several nations have raised troubling questions about possible associations between heavy cell phone use and altered brain metabolism, sleep disturbance, and even diminished sperm count and sperm damage. In 2011, the World Health Organization declared cell phone radiation a possible carcinogen.

    Animal studies support the findings in people. A multi-year study from the U.S. National Toxicology Program found that male rats exposed to radio-frequency radiation from before birth through two years of age had a greater chance of being diagnosed with a brain cancer called malignant glioma, as well as developing a tumor found on the heart. The radiation levels to which the rats were exposed included levels that current cell phones are allowed to emit.

    More research is needed, but numerous studies cast doubt on the adequacy of the existing Federal Communications Commission limits on cell phone radiation to safeguard public health. The FCC rules, published in 1996 and never updated, were based on studies conducted in the 1980s, before cell phones were as common or frequently used. They do not account for risks to children’s developing brains and consider only short-term cell phone use – not frequent calling every day for decades.

    In 2013, the FCC requested public comments to determine whether its radiation exposure limits and policies need to be reassessed. A dozen health and consumer groups, including EWG, called on the FCC for new cell phone radiation standards. Since 2009, more than 50,000 people have signed EWG petitions urging the FCC to set cell phone standards that adequately protect children's health.

    The FCC has also lagged behind in oversight of cell phone radiation testing. As EWG reported, people who hold their phones directly against their bodies or use cell phone cases could receive more radiation than the FCC limit because of flaws in the agency’s testing guidelines. These flaws must be fixed so that the FCC regulations reflect how people actually use their phones.

    Four years have passed since the FCC opened the inquiry into cell phone standards. Why has the commission not acted?

    Now more than ever, American cell phone users need real-world, relevant data on how much radiation phones, and the other wireless devices all around us, emit under various circumstances. Until this information is publicly available, taking steps to lower exposure to wireless radiation is prudent.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  40. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    BMJ (25th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (24th March 2017), Inversion (30th June 2017), Molly4US (26th August 2017), Omni (24th March 2017)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts