+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member winstonsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th November 2015
    Posts
    50
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 184 times in 43 posts

    Default ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxG4lYyitsI

    Attorneys reach the heart of the matter rapidly.

    Please share
    www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to winstonsmith For This Post:

    Atlas (12th September 2016), Baby Steps (12th September 2016), Bluegreen (12th September 2016), Cidersomerset (12th September 2016), Eram (13th September 2016), Ewan (12th September 2016), Fanna (12th September 2016), Ivanhoe (12th September 2016), Satori (12th September 2016), seko (14th September 2016), Streamy (14th September 2016)

  3. Link to Post #2
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    58
    Posts
    22,337
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,248 times in 18,668 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Attorneys Are Told: "Possibility of WTC 7 Collapsing Due to Fire is ZERO"




    Published on 11 Sep 2016


    Explosions before the Collapse of WTC 7: https://youtu.be/qReJQCsIpKw
    ************************************************** ************************
    After a short introduction from Richard Gage AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for
    9/11 Truth, Forensic Structural Engineer Dr. Leroy Hulsey presents the findings and conclusion
    of his WTC 7 Evaluation study to a panel of attorneys at the Justice in Focus 9/11 Symposium
    in New York on Sep 11, 2016. Using finite element modelling, Dr. Hulsey and his team found
    that the official explanation by NIST for the collapse of WTC 7, which is that ordinary office
    fires brought the building down, is wrong.

    After his presentation, when asked by Public Interest Attorney Daniel Sheehan, "On a scale of
    1 to 100, what is the possibility that WTC 7 could have collapsed simply because of fires?" Dr.
    Hulsey replied "Zero". He also said that if any of his Ph.D. students had submitted the explanation
    for the collapse of WTC 7 that NIST gave us, he would have failed them.

    The attorneys on the panel - who sat alongside guest panelists Daniel Sheehan, Barbara Honegger
    and Judge Ferdinando Imposimato, the Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy - were
    Mick Harrison, David Meiswinkle, Mustapha Ndanusa, Andrew Kreig and Bill Veale.

    For more information about The Justice in Focus 9/11 Symposium:
    http://911justiceinfocus.org

    For more information about Dr. Leroy Hulsey's WTC Evaluation Study:
    http://www.wtc7evaluation.org

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Atlas (12th September 2016), Bluegreen (12th September 2016), DePortugal (13th September 2016), Ewan (12th September 2016), onawah (13th September 2016), Rich (12th September 2016)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member Bluegreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th July 2014
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,520
    Thanks
    27,792
    Thanked 21,286 times in 3,448 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    According to Secretary of State John Kerry, Building 7 came down "in a controlled fashion."


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Bluegreen For This Post:

    Atlas (12th September 2016)

  7. Link to Post #4
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    10th July 2013
    Location
    Project Avalon
    Posts
    3,652
    Thanks
    19,216
    Thanked 16,127 times in 3,214 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Larry Silverstein admits WTC7 was pulled down:

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Atlas For This Post:

    Bluegreen (13th September 2016)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member Carmody's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th August 2010
    Location
    Winning The Galactic Lottery
    Posts
    11,379
    Thanks
    17,589
    Thanked 82,044 times in 10,211 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Of course, it would take MONTHS of work to wire that building... and if it, (the wiring and demolition charges) was invisible to the public, mere days before.... then it was a hidden system of demolition..previously installed.

    as was claimed by others, regarding the demolition wiring of the buildings.

    Excepting that demolition charges cannot account for the literal powdering of the the two main towers when they came down.

    Thus, the explanation seems to be that the game that day was preempted by a third player.

    See the works of Joseph Farrell for an explanation on the meaning of that.
    Interdimensional Civil Servant

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Carmody For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), Hervé (14th September 2016), Paul (13th September 2016), seko (14th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member ozmirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2016
    Location
    Jawjah, OOSA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1,111 times in 340 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/mili...e-center/#wtc7

    Fire Storm: WTC 7 stands amid the rubble of the recently collapsed Twin Towers. Damaged by falling debris, the building then endures a fire that rages for hours. Experts say this combination, not a demolition-style implosion, led to the roofline "kink" that signals WTC 7's progressive collapse. (Photograph by New York Office of Emergency Management)

    FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom—approximately 10 stories—about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.

    NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.

    According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."

    There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.

    Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."

    WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors-along with the building's unusual construction-were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.

    Of course, you can believe what you wish...
    Last edited by ozmirage; 13th September 2016 at 18:17.
    The secret of life is that there is no secret of life.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ozmirage For This Post:

    Bluegreen (15th September 2016), fourty-two (13th September 2016)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Netherlands Avalon Member Eram's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2012
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,478
    Thanks
    65,641
    Thanked 10,991 times in 1,435 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Quote Posted by ozmirage (here)


    Of course, you can believe what you wish...
    Luckily, we don't have to resort to "believe" in the case of WTC7,since the first 2,5 seconds of the falling motion of the facade of the building where in free fall acceleration.
    Something which is only possible if all support is removed at once.

    Eight stories of support in this case.
    Last edited by Eram; 13th September 2016 at 18:36.
    hylozoic tenet: “Consciousness sleeps in the stone, dreams in the plant, awakens in the animal, and becomes self-conscious in man.”

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Eram For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), Bluegreen (15th September 2016), fourty-two (13th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Netherlands Avalon Member Eram's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2012
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,478
    Thanks
    65,641
    Thanked 10,991 times in 1,435 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    Of course, it would take MONTHS of work to wire that building... [/URL]
    According to controlled demolition expert Danny Jowenko (Now dead because his car ran into a tree), wiring a building like this can be done in a matter of days.


    hylozoic tenet: “Consciousness sleeps in the stone, dreams in the plant, awakens in the animal, and becomes self-conscious in man.”

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Eram For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), Carmody (13th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Avalon Member Carmody's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th August 2010
    Location
    Winning The Galactic Lottery
    Posts
    11,379
    Thanks
    17,589
    Thanked 82,044 times in 10,211 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    Of course, it would take MONTHS of work to wire that building... [/URL]
    According to controlled demolition expert Danny Jowenko (Now dead because his car ran into a tree), wiring a building like this can be done in a matter of days.


    But the charges and mess from installing them would be seen.

    If the demolition charges were not seen, then this means it was done months ahead of time, inch by inch.

    Which supports the story of Marvin Bush and some partners having OWNED and run a security company that worked on the buildings, for months of nights, at least 9 months before the buildings went down.

    this owned security company ran the contract for the WTC complex security system.

    They ended their contract 9 months before the buildings went down.

    And that they were seen running a construction project for a near months of nights, in the buildings themselves.

    All with the security system and all the cameras disabled, for that whole construction/work they did not he towers, on all those nights.

    Quote Take, as an example, this question of how the explosives were planted. How could the security apparatus of the World Trade Center Complex, which was presumably highly sophisticated after the 1993 bombing, allow or not notice the laying of the explosives that supposedly felled the buildings? Well, upon investigating this security apparatus at the WTC, we quickly stumble into the fact that Marvin Bush, George W.'s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom (now Stratesec), the very company in charge of security at the WTC in 2001. Again, it is important to note that the author is not making this up. "Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport." And not to be outdone by this fact, we also learn that "from 1999 to January of 2002 (Marvin and George W.'s cousin) Wirt Walker III was the company's CEO."

    That this stunning, remarkable fact is not front-page news in every newspaper in the country is a mystery I cannot answer, nor solve. That there were well documented power outages and swaths of whole floor shutdowns and evacuations in the weeks leading up to 9/11, perfect opportunities to carry up and plant necessary explosives under the guise of 'maintenance' and/or 'retrofitting' work, only fuels well-placed suspicions. In a People magazine article, Ben Fountain, 42, a financial analyst with Fireman's Fund who worked on the 47th floor of the South Tower, confirmed these evacuations by saying, "How could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we'd been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on."
    Interdimensional Civil Servant

  18. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Carmody For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), Eram (13th September 2016), Ewan (15th September 2016), Hervé (14th September 2016), hohoemi (14th September 2016), seko (14th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016), Wind (13th September 2016)

  19. Link to Post #10
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    72
    Posts
    27,723
    Thanks
    28,846
    Thanked 129,184 times in 20,635 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    Of course, it would take MONTHS of work to wire that building... [/URL]
    According to controlled demolition expert Danny Jowenko (Now dead because his car ran into a tree), wiring a building like this can be done in a matter of days.


    I suppose it's not impossible that a Competition Speed Demolition team, with plenty of preparation and preplanning and practice, with detailed plans of the specific building to be destroyed, and with all the necessary supplies pre-positioned near to the location, could go from walking in the front door, to dropping a large building of that size, in eight hours. I don't know that it could be done, but I can't rule it out either.

    But, on a day when most ground transportation in lower Manhattan was congested or blocked entirely, when airplanes in and out of New York were grounded, and when ground transportation in other parts of Manhattan was disrupted ... they would have had difficulty getting either their crews or the needed supplies to the parking lot in that eight hours.

    I am as confident as I can be that if some multi-billionaire (or nation state, or three letter agency, or ...), at nine o-clock in the morning, speaking with unquestionable credibility, offered each of the top ten demolition crews in the world a prize of a billion dollars to all of them, if working together they could drop a large, unusually constructed, office building, in the middle of a city, with unusually congested or blocked transportation, and do it with a text book demolition, before sunset, and if the multi-billionaire promised to kill all of them, their spouses, and their children if they failed ... that the demo crews would spend the day hugging their loved ones and updating their wills, or whatever it is that someone does when they suddenly realize they have eight hours to live.

    You can't get there (a demolition of that building, on that day, in that place, in that eight hours), from here (any unplanned and unanticipated demolition), with no pre-planning and pre-positioning of supplies and people.
    Last edited by Paul; 13th September 2016 at 20:29.

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), avid (13th September 2016), Carmody (13th September 2016), Hervé (14th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016)

  21. Link to Post #11
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Posts
    11,494
    Thanks
    27,608
    Thanked 49,458 times in 10,041 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    The Building 7 Challenge: Arrest, Truth, Cognitive Dissonance and Football


    Quote Published on Sep 11, 2016
    Bob Tuskin presents The Building 7 Challenge. He wakes up some, others run and he gets arrested. All bringing awareness to Building 7 on the 15th anniversary of 9/11, at the University of Florida football game.

    http://www.freeyourmindconference.com/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), Ewan (15th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016)

  23. Link to Post #12
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,113 times in 15,477 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Chandler's step-by-step compilation of his discoveries and empirical deductions:



    The Physics of 9/11
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  24. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), DePortugal (13th September 2016), Ewan (15th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016), Sierra (14th September 2016)

  25. Link to Post #13
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    27th January 2011
    Age
    71
    Posts
    9,452
    Thanks
    64,848
    Thanked 29,409 times in 5,423 posts

    Default Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire

    Quote Posted by Eram (here)
    Quote Posted by ozmirage (here)


    Of course, you can believe what you wish...
    Luckily, we don't have to resort to "believe" in the case of WTC7,since the first 2,5 seconds of the falling motion of the facade of the building where in free fall acceleration.
    Something which is only possible if all support is removed at once.

    Eight stories of support in this case.
    Not only that, we have a video of a news reporter announcing the fall of WTC7 (which we see in pristine shape in the video background) before it fell. This implies foreknowledge, and pre planning. That it did not dustify as did the Twin Towers, fell directly into its own footprint simultaneously on all four corners, where compressive puffs of outward explosion foretold the collapse (captured by another video), could be explained by the huge shipment of gold waiting in the basement (which vanished without a trace). Perhaps the motive to destroy the Twin Towers was triple, theft of the gold, distraction from theft, and initiation of war.
    Last edited by Sierra; 14th September 2016 at 00:17.

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sierra For This Post:

    Atlas (13th September 2016), Ewan (15th September 2016), Hervé (14th September 2016), Shannon (13th September 2016), ulli (13th September 2016)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts