+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 3 4 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 62

Thread: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

  1. Link to Post #41
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,719 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Interesting electoral analysis, Trump could win by a land slide:
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Bob (4th November 2016), Cidersomerset (3rd November 2016), mojo (3rd November 2016), Nasu (2nd November 2016), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017)

  3. Link to Post #42
    England Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    16th July 2016
    Location
    Norfolk Uk
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,035
    Thanks
    1,370
    Thanked 3,309 times in 897 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Luke Rudkowski and Killary's 3 cover ups :


  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sueanne47 For This Post:

    Cidersomerset (3rd November 2016), mojo (3rd November 2016), Nasu (2nd November 2016), TargeT (2nd November 2016), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017)

  5. Link to Post #43
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,719 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    I think this is the first real journalism I've seen in years...



    Quote In this video released by Project Veritas Action, a top Democratic donor is caught on camera disparaging members of the African American community at a fundraiser for North Carolina U.S. Senate candidate Deborah Ross. In the video, prominent Ross donor Benjamin Barber expresses his opinion about blacks who vote Republican by comparing them to Nazis.

    “Have you heard of the Sonderkommandos? Jewish guards who helped murder Jews in the camps. So there were even Jews that were helping the Nazis murder Jews! So blacks who are helping the other side are seriously ****ed in the head. They’re only helping the enemy who will destroy them. Maybe they think ‘if I help them we’ll get along okay; somehow I’ll save my race by working with the murderers,’” said Barber at a fundraiser for Ross on the Upper West Side of New York City on September 19, 2016.
    The DNC has been seriously bloodied this election cycle.. I mean, this will be hard to come back from (I can see why there is speculation that the DNC is dropping Hillary, cutting ties).

    If there's NOT a movie made about this period, or several; I'll be SHOCKED.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Cara (4th November 2016), Cidersomerset (3rd November 2016), mojo (3rd November 2016), Paul (4th November 2016), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017)

  7. Link to Post #44
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,719 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    I can't help but think.... this is GREAT for us Cyber Security guys... people won't short the IT budget after this election cycle.... haha

    Quote Hillary Campaign Told DNC to Hold Sham Meetings, Make Primary Look Less Rigged

    Newly-leaked emails show that a major figure in Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign urged the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to schedule meetings with other prospective presidential candidates to make the process appear less biased.

    The email, sent January 2015 before the official launch of Clinton’s campaign, is part of the latest dump of John Podesta emails by the online hacktivist group WikiLeaks. The message, authored by campaign manager Robby Mook, is about a planned meeting between Clinton and then-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and also describes a meeting between Mook and White House political adviser David Simas.

    Mook’s message mostly deals with mundane political details, but at the end he makes an interesting comment that suggests an awareness of pro-Clinton bias at the DNC.

    “I asked [Simas] that he make sure she [DWS] has meetings scheduled with other potential candidates, so they can credibly say they’re meeting with everyone.”

    The sentence is brief but carries a clear implication: Mook is urging the DNC to set up meetings for the sole purpose of looking like it isn’t in the tank for Clinton’s campaign.

    The emails supplement an ample amount of existing evidence that the DNC overtly favored Clinton during the presidential primary process, despite the fact it is supposed to be politically neutral between different Democratic candidates. For instance, then-deputy DNC Chair Donna Brazile fed primary debate questions to Clinton’s campaign, while leaked DNC emails from the summer showed a great deal of official hostility towards Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign.

    Mook’s comment indicates the Clinton campaign was very aware of the DNC’s bias from the beginning of 2015, and was directly advising Wasserman Schultz on how she could make this bias less obvious.
    https://stream.org/new-wikileaks-rel...k-less-rigged/
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Cara (4th November 2016), Cidersomerset (3rd November 2016), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017)

  9. Link to Post #45
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,560
    Thanks
    37,831
    Thanked 52,758 times in 8,858 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    A selfish thought lollllllllllll Target. Although extremely far from being at the level of Clinton lollllll You are salary based - no millions there.

    I was thinking the same - FBI, CIA and NSA as well as the military have a real advantage to put in the open all the crookedness of the Clintons and anyone else, their budget will increase.


    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    I can't help but think.... this is GREAT for us Cyber Security guys... people won't short the IT budget after this election cycle.... haha

    Quote Hillary Campaign Told DNC to Hold Sham Meetings, Make Primary Look Less Rigged

    Newly-leaked emails show that a major figure in Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign urged the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to schedule meetings with other prospective presidential candidates to make the process appear less biased.

    The email, sent January 2015 before the official launch of Clinton’s campaign, is part of the latest dump of John Podesta emails by the online hacktivist group WikiLeaks. The message, authored by campaign manager Robby Mook, is about a planned meeting between Clinton and then-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and also describes a meeting between Mook and White House political adviser David Simas.

    Mook’s message mostly deals with mundane political details, but at the end he makes an interesting comment that suggests an awareness of pro-Clinton bias at the DNC.

    “I asked [Simas] that he make sure she [DWS] has meetings scheduled with other potential candidates, so they can credibly say they’re meeting with everyone.”

    The sentence is brief but carries a clear implication: Mook is urging the DNC to set up meetings for the sole purpose of looking like it isn’t in the tank for Clinton’s campaign.

    The emails supplement an ample amount of existing evidence that the DNC overtly favored Clinton during the presidential primary process, despite the fact it is supposed to be politically neutral between different Democratic candidates. For instance, then-deputy DNC Chair Donna Brazile fed primary debate questions to Clinton’s campaign, while leaked DNC emails from the summer showed a great deal of official hostility towards Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign.

    Mook’s comment indicates the Clinton campaign was very aware of the DNC’s bias from the beginning of 2015, and was directly advising Wasserman Schultz on how she could make this bias less obvious.
    https://stream.org/new-wikileaks-rel...k-less-rigged/

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Bob (4th November 2016), TargeT (4th November 2016), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017)

  11. Link to Post #46
    England Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    16th July 2016
    Location
    Norfolk Uk
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,035
    Thanks
    1,370
    Thanked 3,309 times in 897 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    A striking resemblance...dont you think? (Dolores Umbridge)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	d6d247e68664c180fe4608f657d1ae5d.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	43.3 KB
ID:	34491

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sueanne47 For This Post:

    Bob (4th November 2016), NancyV (18th November 2016), TargeT (4th November 2016), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017)

  13. Link to Post #47
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,719 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    The media collusion failed so badly, here comes the damage control...

    more media collusion?
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    NancyV (18th November 2016), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017), TouchTone (3rd January 2017)

  15. Link to Post #48
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    31st December 2016
    Location
    TN/NC/GA Tri-state region
    Age
    71
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 42 times in 6 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Two hours into the count, the DNC election fix was discovered and undone. This prevented Hillary from stealing a win that she did not earn. She was told she could not lose, so she had not prepared for a loss. The details of this may never fully see the light of day. The intelligence community knows the truth, including the truth behind the claims of hacking. That is only an attempt to de-legitimize the election. The report was delivered to Trump via courier, which is why Trump recently mentioned that sending messages via courier is the safest method and that he knows things that others don't know. He is in the loop, despite the assertions that he's not taking his intelligence briefings.

    I have read the CIA report, and it is full of politically motivated opinions. Nothing of evidentiary value will be disclosed because it would reveal classified assets that were used to develop the intelligence. I cannot fully disclose either for the same reason. If all goes well, Trump will assume the role of POTUS and most of this mess will be forgotten. With what he knows, hopefully steps will be taken to prevent this sort of mess from happening again in future elections. The corruption in both political parties, and in many outside of politics with stakes in the game, is rampant. If our country is to survive this, we need a huge broom to sweep away the corruption in our political system and those outside of politics that use their money to buy what they want from the politicians.

    Happy New Year
    Last edited by TouchTone; 3rd January 2017 at 03:37. Reason: Typo

  16. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to TouchTone For This Post:

    Billy (3rd January 2017), Hervé (3rd January 2017), JRS (4th January 2017), NancyV (3rd January 2017), Sammy (4th January 2017), StandingWave (3rd January 2017), TargeT (3rd January 2017), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017)

  17. Link to Post #49
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,719 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Hilary's camp is not done yet, they have just shifted attack fronts...

    Who really influenced the election??

    Quote On this episode of The Geopolitical Report, we examine the unsubstantiated claim by President Obama, Democrats, and Republicans that the 2016 presidential election was fixed by Vladimir Putin and the Russians. The Washington Post and The New York Times are leading the charge to delegitimize the election and unseat Donald Trump. Absent from the debate is the fact the CIA has specialized in meddling in foreign elections and has orchestrated coups and assassinations of political leaders for decades. The NSA, the national security state, and its partners have at their disposal the technology to influence elections, not by changing votes but by using psychological operations and propaganda. The NSA and the CIA are at the forefront of that effort. On this episode of The Geopolitical Report, we examine the unsubstantiated claim by President Obama, Democrats, and Republicans that the 2016 presidential election was fixed by Vladimir Putin and the Russians. The Washington Post and The New York Times are leading the charge to delegitimize the election and unseat Donald Trump. Absent from the debate is the fact the CIA has specialized in meddling in foreign elections and has orchestrated coups and assassinations of political leaders for decades. The NSA, the national security state, and its partners have at their disposal the technology to influence elections, not by changing votes but by using psychological operations and propaganda. The NSA and the CIA are at the forefront of that effort.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    JRS (4th January 2017), onawah (3rd January 2017), Sammy (4th January 2017), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017), TouchTone (4th January 2017)

  19. Link to Post #50
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    27th January 2011
    Posts
    124
    Thanks
    9,874
    Thanked 495 times in 107 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Happy New Year Touchtone! Thank you for your service and welcome to Avalon!

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JRS For This Post:

    The Freedom Train (11th January 2017), TouchTone (4th January 2017)

  21. Link to Post #51
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,111 times in 15,477 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    As Americans freak out over Russian fake news, FBI quietly released new Clinton investigation docs

    Baran Hines Free Thought Project
    Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:27 UTC



    The Federal Bureau of Investigation has released a new batch of documents cataloging the investigation of Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton. The documents were released Sunday on the bureau's website, which has a page dedicated to the investigation of Hillary Clinton. WikiLeaks called attention to the release on their Twitter account with a link to a web archive listing showing the updated page. The FBI did not make an announcement related to the release.

    Quote
    WikiLeaks Verified account ‏@wikileaks

    FBI quietly releases new Hillary Clinton investigation documents (part 5) [as yet, no announcement]
    http://archive.is/PBVpZ
    The lack of comment by FBI officials has generated more questions than answers about the scale of the investigation into Clinton. The file is 299 pages and many of the documents are part of the basics of building a federal case including the preservation of records, evidence chain of custody, and listing many seized items.

    There are many redactions in the documents, however, the context shows the investigation made significant progress before the contested Democratic primary race started in 2016, as most of the documents are dated in 2015. Many of the documents also reveal the procedures used to conceal details of the FBI's investigation.

    The first document in the file is the initial report titled "Opening of Full Investigation on a Sensitive Investigative Matter (SIM)," which is dated July 10, 2015. It states the investigation is designated as a SIM because of the "connection to a current public official, political appointee or candidate," which kept the status of the case out of the public domain.

    The same report also lists the case as a prohibited investigation, which receives special classification for counterintelligence needs.
    "Due to the extremely sensitive nature of this investigation and the damage its disclosure could cause, the case will be designated as a prohibited investigation in accordance with Counterintelligence Division Policy Implementation Guide," the report states.
    FBI's Counterintelligence division requested the preservation of records for multiple lists of email accounts. One list included 422 redacted accounts and another listed 912 accounts. All of the requests are dated August 18, 2015.

    On page 235 of the documents, the FBI admits the Office of Inspector General found classified materials on Clinton's server. This means the FBI knew about this leak well before anything was made public — and while Clinton was publicly denying it the entire time.



    The claims of Russian responsibility for the hack have been heavily criticized by security experts in the US intelligence community. The original hacker Guccifer, whom the 2.0 moniker is referencing, has also dismissed the US government's claims as 'crazy' in an interview last week.

    'Americans are crazy about the Russian thing and that Russians are invading the United States,' Guccifer said regarding the Russian hacking claims. 'It's crazy ... it's this hysteria you know?'

    WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has repeatedly stated it was not Russian hackers who were responsible for the DNC leaks. Assange also hinted that it may have been murdered DNC staff member Seth Rich who leaked the documents.

    American news media has used the claims of Russian responsibility to dismiss the importance of the information revealed by the email leaks which showed DNC officials favoring the campaign of Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.

    The scandal revealed detailed and continuous efforts by DNC officials to get Hillary Clinton selected as the nominee, the most controversial of which involved the DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. Schultz was forced to resign the day before the convention began, and was immediately hired by the campaign of Hillary Clinton.

    American news media has continued to claim that Russian efforts to influence voters was the cause of Hillary Clinton losing, but largely ignores the content of Hillary Clinton's numerous scandals, even after the election ended. The result has been a campaign of anti-Russian sentiment which blames the political dysfunction in America on Russian agents, instead of the Democratic party officials who actually influenced the election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

    Last week, President Obama quietly deployed U.S. Special Forces troops to positions along the Russian border, representing one of the more dangerous consequences of the fake news campaign to distract Americans with Russian hacking claims.

    Anti-Russian sentiment escalated in November after the collective claims of American news media that websites publishing "fake news" were largely responsible for the change in public opinion about Hillary Clinton, which they claim benefitted the campaign of President Donald Trump. The Free Thought Project was named on the list referenced, however, the list has since been largely discredited. The fake news campaign was recently punctuated by the provision meant to "counter propaganda and disinformation directed at the United States," which was embedded in the new National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

    The fake news campaign has also led to the censorship of alternative media organizations, who have had a significant part in spreading information about corruption such as the DNC sabotage of Bernie Sanders and the various scandals surrounding Hillary Clinton. The Free Thought Project has continuously reported on how American news media has used their own fake news stories to create anti-Russian sentiment, and even profits off of it prior to retractions forced by the facts.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  22. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (9th January 2017), Blacklight43 (9th January 2017), Ewan (11th January 2017), Foxie Loxie (30th March 2018), TargeT (9th January 2017), The Freedom Train (11th January 2017), TouchTone (11th January 2017), Wind (11th January 2017)

  23. Link to Post #52
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,111 times in 15,477 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Holding her feet to the fire: House Oversight chair vows to continue investigation into Hillary's use of private server

    RT
    Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:32 UTC


    © Gary Cameron / Reuters "Just because there was a political election doesn’t mean it goes away."

    Hillary Clinton's problems aren't going away, according to House Oversight Chair Jason Chaffetz, who has vowed to continue the investigation into her use of a private email server.

    The Republican congressman told CNN: "Just because there was a political election doesn't mean it goes away."

    Chaffetz described Clinton's use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state as "the largest breach of security in the history of the State Department."

    "It cannot, and should not be repeated ever again," said Chaffetz, whose committee possesses subpoena power. After reopening the investigation weeks before the presidential election in November, FBI Director James Comey told Congress that they had failed to unearth any new information that would warrant bringing charges against Clinton.

    President-elect Donald Trump continuously attacked Clinton over her use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state, claiming he would prosecute her if elected. Following his election success, the president-elect changed his attitude toward Clinton, claiming she had already "suffered greatly."

    Chaffetz said his committee would be open to investigating issues arising from Trump's administration too, claiming his job "is not to be a cheerleader for the president."

    When questioned about possible conflicts of interest arising from Trump's businesses, Chaffetz admitted that the laws regarding conflicts and the president "should be tightened up," but declined to comment on specific cases.

    Along with the Clinton investigation, the committee will continue other outstanding investigations, including the ATF gunwalking scandal where guns were allowed to be sold to straw buyers to track them.

    An investigation into Mylan, the manufacturers of EpiPen whose price increased dramatically will also continue, according to Chaffetz, who said the company "fed us a bunch of bull."

    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  24. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Ewan (11th January 2017), Foxie Loxie (30th March 2018), JRS (11th January 2017), Noelle (11th January 2017), TargeT (11th January 2017), TouchTone (12th January 2017)

  25. Link to Post #53
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,111 times in 15,477 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Deadly Wikileak reveals Clinton's [alleged] murder of Seth Rich to 'make an example'

    Martin Walsh Conservative Daily Post
    Sun, 22 Jan 2017 14:39 UTC


    © Your News Wire

    Was Seth Rich murdered for being the source for WikiLeaks?

    Many have speculated what happened to the DNC staffer after he was mysteriously murdered around the exact same time he worked to file a lawsuit against the DNC for rigging the election against Bernie Sanders and in favor of Hillary Clinton.

    There are a ton of issues with the entire situation, but Julian Assange may have tipped his hand on this case. Wikileaks announced months ago that they would offer a $20,000 reward for information that lead to a conviction in the Seth Rich murder case

    Seth Rich worked for the DNC as a voter database employee. The case has no witnesses, clues, or evidence, and it has sparked many to revisit claims of a possible Clinton kill list.

    Clue#1: Less than a week after the initial WikiLeaks email dump, Rich was shot in the back of the head late at night while walking back to his apartment. He was not robbed nor was his apartment broken into.

    Clue #2: Julian Assange has never offered a reward of any kind and has never spoken on behalf of anyone being named as a source.

    When you watch the two minute video below, notice Assange's mannerisms and how careful thought out his answers are. He is struggling to keep Rich a secret, but we can clearly see he was the source that played a major role in taking down Hillary Clinton.

    Clue #3: Hidden Americans recently released investigative analysis on the multiple ways in which Seth Rich was connected to Hillary Clinton's campaign. They showed a link between Julian Assange and Seth Rich, and that Assange had all but confirmed Rich was helping him.

    After all, Seth worked in the voter database division, so he had access to the database centers - which could be how Assange gained access to all of the DNC's data materials and emails.

    Clue #4: John Podesta, Hillary's campaign chairman and top ally, emailed about "making an example out of the leaker."

    © wikileaks



    One can easily see how quickly this can go from a conspiracy theory to a strong argument. There are many clues here that point to the Clintons having Seth Rich murdered. The evidence appears to be strong enough for Julian Assange to risk it all by trying to help solve this murder.

    Although Julian Assange has not officially indicated that Rich was his source, he did admit that Rich was murdered assassination style, and that points a giant finger towards the Clintons and their long history of "mysterious murders."

    It was reported that Rich was shot in the back of the head while he was leaving his car. He was not robbed, moved, or anything. His apartment was not broken into, nor was any evidence left behind indicating he was robbed. Which raises the question: Isn't it very suspicious that Rich was murdered shortly after WikiLeaks began releasing all of their info on the DNC's collusion with Hillary?

    Again, it is vital that this story does not slip away and lose attention. Rich was more than likely the staffer that provided WikiLeaks all of the information they needed to destroy Hillary and her presidential campaign.

    He is an American hero, and we should treat him and this case in that respect.

    ================================================== =

    Did anyone get that?

    Quote I'm definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker...
    ... a LEAKER! Not a "hacker" and, therefore, definitively not a Russian working at the DNC... or else, HRC and/or Podesta have hired personnel from the FSB...

    A rough timeline goes as follows:

    Podesta's e-mail was from February 2015.

    Seth Rich was eliminated on July 10, 2016...

    Wikileak published the DNC e-mails on July 22, 2016 and

    the "Russian" hacks stories started going around in June 2016.

    However, DNC officials got wind of the leaks in April 2016 by pretending "Unusual network activities" were spotted.

    ... but, a "leaker" was already suspected by Podesta in early 2015...
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  26. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    BMJ (23rd January 2017), DebJoy (22nd January 2017), Ewan (23rd January 2017), Foxie Loxie (30th March 2018), Innocent Warrior (4th April 2017), lilac (22nd January 2017), onawah (22nd January 2017), TargeT (23rd January 2017)

  27. Link to Post #54
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 95,111 times in 15,477 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Clinton Foundation may be dead but case against Killary marches on

    Investors Business Daily
    Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:36 UTC


    Former U.S. President Bill Clinton walks on stage at the Clinton Global Initiative. © AP

    While everyone's been gearing up for President Trump's inauguration, the Clinton Foundation made a major announcement this week that went by with almost no notice: For all intents and purposes, it's closing its doors.

    In a tax filing, the Clinton Global Initiative said it's firing 22 staffers and closing its offices, a result of the gusher of foreign money that kept the foundation afloat suddenly drying up after Hillary Clinton failed to win the presidency.

    It proves what we've said all along: The Clinton Foundation was little more than an influence-peddling scheme to enrich the Clintons, and had little if anything to do with "charity," either overseas or in the U.S. That sound you heard starting in November was checkbooks being snapped shut in offices around the world by people who had hoped their donations would buy access to the next president of the United States.

    And why not? There was a strong precedent for it in Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. While serving as the nation's top diplomat, the Clinton Foundation took money from at least seven foreign governments — a clear breach of Clinton's pledge on taking office that there would be total separation between her duties and the foundation.

    Is there a smoking gun? Well, of the 154 private interests who either officially met or had scheduled phone talks with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state, at least 85 were donors to the Clinton Foundation or one of its programs.

    In November, we asked the question: "Is The Clinton Foundation Doomed?" The answer is yes.

    All the way back in May, we outlined how the Clinton Foundation had taken in $100 million from a collection of Gulf sheikhs and billionaires, along with millions from private businesses, who expected — and received — special access to the State Department's top official, Hillary.

    In his 2015 book "Clinton Cash," author Peter Schweizer showed how during Hillary's years in government "the Clintons have conducted or facilitated hundreds of large transactions (either as private citizens or government officials) with foreign governments, corporations and private financiers." He called the sums going to the Clintons "staggering."

    Using the Freedom of Information Act, Judicial Watch in August obtained emails (that had been hidden from investigators) showing that Clinton's top State Department aide, Huma Abedin, had given "special expedited access to the secretary of state" for those who gave $25,000 to $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. Many of those were facilitated by a former executive of the foundation, Doug Band, who headed Teneo, a shell company that managed the Clintons' affairs.

    As part of this elaborate arrangement, Abedin was given special permission to work for the State Department, the Clinton Foundation and Teneo — another very clear conflict of interest.

    As Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said at the time, "These new emails confirm that Hillary Clinton abused her office by selling favors to Clinton Foundation donors."

    The seedy saga doesn't end there. Indeed, there are so many facets to it, some may never be known. But there is still at least one and possibly four active federal investigations into the Clintons' supposed charity.

    Americans aren't willing to forgive and forget. Earlier this month, the IBD/TIPP Poll asked Americans whether they would like President Obama to pardon Hillary for any crimes she may have committed as secretary of state, including the illegal use of an unsecured homebrew email server. Of those queried, 57% said no. So if public sentiment is any guide, the Clintons' problems may just be beginning.

    Writing in the Washington Post in August of 2016, Charles Krauthammer pretty much summed up the whole tawdry tale: "The foundation is a massive family enterprise disguised as a charity, an opaque and elaborate mechanism for sucking money from the rich and the tyrannous to be channeled to Clinton Inc.," he wrote. "Its purpose is to maintain the Clintons' lifestyle (offices, travel accommodations, etc.), secure profitable connections, produce favorable publicity and reliably employ a vast entourage of retainers, ready to serve today and at the coming Clinton Restoration."

    Except, now there is no Clinton Restoration. So there's no reason for any donors to give money to the foundation. It lays bare the fiction of a massive "charitable organization," and shows it for what it was: a scam to sell for cash the waning influence of the Democrats' pre-eminent power couple. As far as the charity landscape goes, the Clinton Global Initiative won't be missed.

    RELATED:
    Clinton Foundation Scandal
    Hillary Clinton Email Scandal News
    After Ignoring Obama Scandals For 8 Years, Reporters Are Now Making Them Up About Trump
    Clinton Scandal: A Case Study In How Bill And Hillary Cashed In On Their Foundation
    Scandals At State: How Clinton, Kerry Used Office To Enrich Their Families
    The Clinton Scandals: Let The Investigations Continue
    Is The Clinton Foundation Doomed?
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  28. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Ewan (23rd January 2017), Foxie Loxie (30th March 2018), Innocent Warrior (4th April 2017), onawah (23rd January 2017), Shannon (23rd January 2017), TargeT (23rd January 2017)

  29. Link to Post #55
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,719 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    It proves what we've said all along: The Clinton Foundation was little more than an influence-peddling scheme to enrich the Clintons, and had little if anything to do with "charity," either overseas or in the U.S. That sound you heard starting in November was checkbooks being snapped shut in offices around the world by people who had hoped their donations would buy access to the next president of the United States.
    That's one of the strong reasons Trump won; and man.. they couldn't kick the can down the road for a year or so so it wouldn't be so blatantly obvious?

    Who's making these decisions?
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Ewan (23rd January 2017), Hervé (23rd January 2017), Innocent Warrior (4th April 2017)

  31. Link to Post #56
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,719 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    I'm kinda surprised, I didn't think that this would go anywhere.

    Quote Trump argument bolstered: Clinton could have received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds

    Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud.
    Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion.
    Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump.Mr. Richman calculated that Mrs. Clinton would have collected 81 percent of noncitizen votes.
    “Is it plausible that non-citizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes,” Mr. Richman wrote. “Is it plausible that non-citizen votes account for the entire nation-wide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.”
    Still, the finding is significant because it means noncitizens may have helped Mrs. Clinton carry a state or finish better than she otherwise would have.
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-from-nonciti/
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Hervé (28th January 2017), Innocent Warrior (4th April 2017)

  33. Link to Post #57
    Australia Avalon Member Innocent Warrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th October 2014
    Location
    Great Northern Hotel, Twin Peaks.
    Posts
    3,387
    Thanks
    23,852
    Thanked 24,435 times in 3,069 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Claims from Commander X at Anon Global.

    RUSSIANS, RUSSIANS….EVERYWHERE: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE 2016 US ELECTION, WHO DID IT, & WHY

    Quote Before we dive into a little reality check for America, I would like to lay out what this article is, and is not – and what you the reader can expect to take away from it. This way you can save time, and simply decide not to read further.

    What I am willing to offer you is the Truth as I have discovered it. My quest for this particular Truth began quite some time prior to even the concept of election hacking, with an investigation into the Guccifer phenomenon. I did not search out these Truths so that I could enlighten the world, I am not a journalist. This is part of my job as an Information Activist to be aware of the playing field and actors operating in Cyber Space. As such, I neither have, nor would I provide if I did – any sort of hard ‘forensic’ evidence of what I am about to tell you. For the average reader, the veracity of my conclusions must rest solely upon my own reputation in both knowledge and honesty. I am simply not in the business of providing evidence to the world and potentially law enforcement that could be used against my fellow hackers in the Underground. If it’s proof you demand, your journalists and law enforcement will need to seek that out themselves based on what I will present here – as I’ll not help them. That is their job, not mine.

    What I will provide is a cogent and logical, albeit radically different – concept of what actually took place during the latest election cycle in the USA. It will tangent more than a few data points already in the public domain, more than enough to warrant and facilitate further investigation. Certainly enough to bring into question the prevailing narrative coming from the USA government and it’s proxy media in the west regarding the latest election. With all this in mind, this is what I learned investigating the circumstances of the 2016 Election in the USA.

    As I stated above, my investigation began long before the election cycle in the USA even got underway, and was instead centered on what I have come to call the Guccifer Phenomenon. And here at the very beginning is where I will straight away leave the mainstream narrative behind with a startling discovery. Wrap your mind around this, Guccifer is not a person – it is a Crew! Approximately six to eight individuals from Ukraine, Serbia, and Romania. Now let’s drill down on this so you understand exactly what I mean here. First I don’t believe this Crew ever called themselves Guccifer Crew. That was most likely a stage name, not even the actual hacker handle but a simple front name – for the person who was the leader of this Crew. An individual we now know is a Romanian hacker currently serving consecutive terms first in Romania than in the USA for cyber crime related offenses.



    Eventually, I made contact with one member of this Crew whom I shall not name. Nor will I share what we discussed in specific terms. We talked in general about the state of hacktivism in the West versus Eastern Europe and Russia. We specifically spoke in that regard about Anonymous and it’s presence in Russia. I found this individual to be calm and thoughtful, intelligent and skilled. My feeling is that like so many Hacker Crews coming from that region, they didn’t even fly a flag or even have a name for their Crew. Certainly, they had no public meme like that. They did seem very tight, loyal, and compatible. While not affiliated with Anonymous, they were in contact with and worked with individual Anons and Anonymous Cells all over the world. A solid underground Crew with no need for glamor, or even a name. And certainly not affiliated with any Nation State. Of this, I’m absolutely certain.

    Now let’s examine the three major cyber-related events that appear to have significantly influenced the Election, and caused massive chaos in the government of the USA. First, the hack and dump of the DNC E-Mail spool. We all know who everyone says did it, the omnipowerful and omnipresent Russian Spooks. Obviously, my investigation led me to a completely different conclusion. Instead, for me, the trail led to a Cell within the Global Collective called Anonymous Russia. This National Cell is managed by approximately eight individuals, six of whom have been arrested by Russian authorities since the election and charged with some extremely weird cyber-offenses. One member of this Cell managed to escape and is publicly seeking political asylum in Eastern Europe. I believe this Cell liberated the DNC E-Mail spool, gave it to the Guccifer Crew, who in turn delivered it to WikiLeaks for publication. This hand-off was necessitated not for obfuscation of nation state involvement, but because of the language gap – which the Guccifer Crew is better at navigating than Anonymous Russia.



    The motive here was simple political hacktivism. Like it or not Russian Information Activists have as much reason (arguably more) to hate the USA as Jester and his “Patriot Hackers” have to hate Russia. And to argue they were either State sponsored or State sanctioned is ludicrous and ignores the glaring reality that the entire cell was wiped out by FSB, save one lone Anon who escaped – just after the election.

    That brings us to the Podesta hack and dump of his personal E-Mail spool. This was accomplished in-house by the Guccifer Crew. And again, this was strictly motivated by political hacktivism, in this case specifically, it was the NATO interference in the Ukraine situation. Which brings us to the persona known publicly as Guccifer 2.0. There has been so much speculation as to this individual. Except….they’re not. An individual, that is. This is simply the main public account of the current Guccifer Crew (sans their leader, who’s in prison) which I believe is admined by the person who now leads the Crew, but is accessible to at least two other individuals in the Crew. There are numerous leads I can’t discuss that led me to this particular conclusion. But one piece of public evidence screams out, and cinched it up for me as a Black Hat hacker myself.

    In the course of these events, both Guccifer and Guccifer 2.0 gave interviews to main stream media outlets. It was the first, with the original Guccifer, currently incarcerated in Romania, that I paid the closest attention to in order to determine how legitimate Guccifer 2.0 was. You might ask, how does that work? Simple. Black Hat hackers are a culture, and quite predictable in many areas. One of those is name space. Your handle is everything, it’s your brand, your personal reputation, and eventually your legacy. Hackers in the Underground are extremely covetous of this name space. The name Guccifer is a truly fantastic name space, both topically because it just sounds cool and is easy to remember, and also because of the legacy the first original Guccifer attached to it with his amazing hacks. If Guccifer 2.0 were anything but 100% legitimate, the original Guccifer would have made an unmistakable point in no uncertain terms of outing and denying the persona during his interview. Instead, he did exactly the opposite, not saying one word about Guccifer 2.0. Because they were his Crew. Guccifer didn’t cooperate when captured, he remained loyal to his Crew and would do anything to protect them. This is all obvious and beyond dispute to actual Black Hat Hackers in the Underground, who understand that honor is everything and that collaborators should rot in hell.

    This brings us to WikiLeaks. Some have tried to argue that these dumps could have been accomplished without the assistance of WikiLeaks. This is plain stupid. Yes, there are many disclosure platforms that have cropped up in WikiLeaks wake – but to have the sort of devastating political impact that these disclosures had requires the top shelf, not spin-offs. The expertise and sheer grace with which Julian navigated these bomb-shell disclosures once again affirms his utter genius in the realm of Information Activism.



    There has been a massive attempt by the disingenuous msm media in the West to try to somehow connect WikiLeaks to the Russian government, thus explaining the motivation for his disclosure strategy. Now, I’m not going to attempt to speak for or climb into the head of Julian Assange, despite my deep love for him and the mutual respect we share as comrades in this movement. But I am going to state some obvious and well-known facts. WikiLeaks and Anonymous, as well as the Hacker Underground in the West – are at war with the government of the USA. This war was declared by the USDOJ in 2010, and has been raging ever since. This is well-established hacktivist history.

    While no other motivation is necessary to adequately explain the actions of WikiLeaks in this election, there is another motivation I suspect crossed Assange’s mind. I know for a fact that for many years Julian’s over-arching concern has been obtaining the freedom of alleged leaker Chelsea Manning from her 35 year prison term. Her commutation was so controversial, so politically charged, that I believe Obama would have used any excuse he could find to avoid it. Had Hillary won the election, her being a fellow liberal may have been enough for Obama to say **** it and punt the whole mess into her term for her to deal with. And come on, as much as Clinton despises WikiLeaks and Julian do you really believe she would have ever helped Manning? I for one seriously doubt it. That would have meant at bare minimum Chelsea would have remained in a cage for an additional twelve to sixteen years awaiting a new pardon cycle with a new liberal leadership. And if that didn’t come, she may well have served the entire sentence – if she survived. Trump getting elected forced Obama’s hand, and left him with little choice but to do the right thing.

    Tandem to WikiLeaks actions during the election, there were a handful of Anons and Information Activists here in the west (myself included) who seeing this successful strategy unfolding leaped in to assist WikiLeaks in the dissemination of the disclosures, and to generally support the effort by wreaking havoc in any way possible. This group was small, maybe eight individuals – as most of the western Information Activists didn’t understand the point and thought Julian had gone crazy or been co-opted by the Russians. And like everyone else we’ve examined so far, and particularly co-tangent to WikiLeaks – the motivation of this small band of hacktivists assisting Wikileaks was hatred of the USA for its political persecution of Information Activists using the brutal CFAA.



    There has been much talk from the western White Hats about signatures. The Russian Spooks did it, because the IP address signature, the code signature, and the behavioral signatures all matched a supposed gang of Russian Agents hacking for the State. Let’s start with the IP signatures. Please. It’s called a VPN. Mine has three Russian exit nodes if I need them. Then there’s always IP spoofing. An IP is zero evidence of anything, and anyone who is honest needs to admit this. As for code signatures, this may impress the average citizen – but a Black Hat will simply laugh out loud. We trade, sell, and steal each others code (and code from White Hats as well) so much that this is a ridiculous thing to try and pin down. I just busted open a random script for a payload I have in my arsenal and I counted code from five countries on three continents in one package.

    That leaves behavioral signatures. In the above analysis of the Election, there were essentially only two primary hacks involved, the DNC and Podesta attacks. They were both simple E-Mail spool theft and dump operations. Something the Russian Intelligence has never done in its entire history. But there is a group for whom E-Mail hack and dump is a very signature behavior: Anonymous. Let’s look at some recent history.

    2008: Sarah Palin’s E-Mail is hacked by Anonymous and her spool is dumped to WikiLeaks, who published them.

    2010: HB Gary Federal, a cyber security contractor – is hacked by Anonymous. Seventy thousand E-Mails are taken and published on Barrett Brown’s site Project PM.

    2011: A hacktivist crew loosely affiliated with Anonymous called Anti Sec hacks the private Intelligence firm Stratfor, stealing years of E-Mail and eventually dumping them to WikiLeaks who published them as the “Global Intelligence Files”.

    2012: My own Crew, together with Anti Sec – hack the E-Mail of the entire Syrian government, including the private accounts of President Assad and his wife. In total, over 70 million E-Mails are liberated, dumped to WikiLeaks, and were subsequently published.

    How’s that for signature behavior? O-o You know what they said to Snow White, right? If the shoe fits….
    See source for more (with links).
    Never give up on your silly, silly dreams.

    You mustn't be afraid to dream a little BIGGER, darling.

  34. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Innocent Warrior For This Post:

    Ewan (4th April 2017), Hervé (4th April 2017), KiwiElf (4th April 2017), Paul (4th April 2017)

  35. Link to Post #58
    Morocco Avalon Member PurpleLama's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd January 2011
    Location
    Ignoring Your Outrage
    Posts
    4,052
    Thanks
    26,475
    Thanked 32,523 times in 3,936 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Something seems off, and then I get to the end where it says, you know what they said to Snow White.... And it should have been Cinderella.

    Add:

    I guess this pretty much distracts from murdered DNC staff.
    God bless the Fae
    God bless Me

  36. Link to Post #59
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    72
    Posts
    27,723
    Thanks
    28,846
    Thanked 129,182 times in 20,635 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    .
    There is (in my view) an excellent article on the role of the "Steel Dossier", Christopher Steele, Carter Page, Andrew McCabe, James Comey, John Brennan, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Glenn Simpson, Harry Reid, Fusion GPS, the FBI, the CIA, the FISA Court, and others in the US 2016 Presidential election and the efforts of the Democrats to defeat Donald Trump by framing him for colluding with Vladimir Putin and the Russians.

    The article can be found in the National Review, at: The Real Collusion Story, by Michael Doran.

    I came across the article thanks to the latest post by Q, just a few hours ago, in which he gives a link to the article, and adds just one more word: "Truth". To the best of my understanding, I agree with Q on this. This article is detailed, accurate and perceptive.

    I won't quote the entire article here. It's nearly 14,000 words long so rather too long for reasonable post.

    But the following, final paragraphs of the article sum up pretty well what conclusions it comes to, and the point of view that it takes.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The event that shaped the dossier more than any other was the hack of the DNC. Guccifer 2.0 first began releasing documents on June 15. A week later, Steele produced his first report. The Hillary Clinton that emerged from the DNC emails was preternaturally unsuited to a populist moment. Here she was: the Hillary Clinton who made high-priced speeches to Wall Street on the eve of the Iowa caucuses. Here was the co-executive of the international slush funds of the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. Here was the power-hungry political boss who worked with the DNC to fix the Democratic primaries. Clinton’s supporters instinctively understood the size of the wound that the hack opened up, and they worked frantically to cauterize it — which meant deflecting attention from the greed, entitlement, and sleaze that characterized Clinton, Inc.

    The dossier quickly became a tool for denying the deficiencies of Bill and Hillary Clinton, projecting them onto Donald Trump. Is Bill Clinton a sexual predator? That’s nothing. Trump pays teams of prostitutes to pee on him! Did Hillary Clinton preside over the failed “reset” with Russia? That’s nothing. Putin is blackmailing Trump, and he fears Hillary! Did Bill Clinton pocket a $500,000 fee for a speech he gave in Moscow, shortly before the sale of American uranium to Russian interests? That’s nothing. Trump’s been dependent on Putin for years! Do the emails from the DNC prove that Hillary Clinton rigged the primaries? That’s nothing. Trump conspired with Putin to rig the entire election!

    In the wake of the DNC hack, leading figures in the press and senior officials in the Obama administration faced a choice. They could depict Carter Page as he really was: an unknown man of modest accomplishments who played no role of note in the Trump organization. Or they could conspire with Fusion GPS to promote the fiction that he was a sly operative in a sinister network. In a fateful choice, they opted for dishonesty and deception over truth.

    Once the enablers of Hillary Clinton compromised their own integrity, they internalized her program of denial and projection. Their own egos are now invested in perpetuating it. To avoid owning up to their shortcomings, they insist, in ever-shriller tones, on the personal integrity of the super spy and the credibility of his reports. The mere acknowledgement of a simple truth — that the “dossier” is junk — would constitute an admission either of deep professional malfeasance or of gob-smacking gullibility.

    Choose your poison: You duped people and thereby abetted a gross abuse of power; or you were yourself badly duped. That is the dilemma that the lofty-minded now face. The choice is excruciating. It requires abandoning satisfying self-images and embracing painful self-truths — while also handing a well-deserved victory to a hated political enemy. As a consequence, the Steele dossier has proved to be as consequential as it is asinine.


    The Greatest Denier

    Of course, no one is in deeper denial than Hillary Clinton herself. After she had conceded to Trump on the night of the election, Obama called her. Taking the phone, she said, “Mr. President, I’m sorry.”

    Sorry, no doubt, that the baton had fallen to the ground once again. Sorry that she would not be the first female president. Sorry that she would not hold the reins of power. But was contrition an aspect of any component of her sorrow?

    If there is one thing Hillary Clinton does not do well, it is contrition. In an interview last September, she clung to the fiction that the election was stolen. Her belief that Trump conspired with Putin was absolute. “There certainly was communication, and there certainly was an understanding of some sort,” Clinton said. She had “no doubt” that Putin sought a Trump victory, that there was “a tangle of financial relationships” between Trump and Russia, and that Trump’s associates “worked really hard to hide their connections with Russians.” Were those, in her mind, clear signs of collusion? “I’m convinced of it,” she said.

    She will remain convinced until the day she dies. The alternative, a rigorous examination of conscience, is too painful to contemplate. How much longer will Hillary Clinton’s damaged psyche hold America hostage?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    It's well worth a read, if you read fast, and still haven't got enough details of this US election, justice and media scandal of 2016.
    Last edited by Paul; 29th March 2018 at 12:11.

  37. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    BMJ (31st March 2018), edina (29th March 2018), Foxie Loxie (29th March 2018), mountain_jim (29th March 2018), TargeT (29th March 2018)

  38. Link to Post #60
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    1,861
    Thanks
    16,523
    Thanked 10,857 times in 1,711 posts

    Default Re: Rigging the Election: DNC/Hillary's multi front assault.

    Many thanks for the summary as I don't have the time right now for the whole thing, which I went to and realized was a huge article.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.) :)

  39. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (29th March 2018), Paul (29th March 2018), TargeT (29th March 2018)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts