+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

  1. Link to Post #1
    Canada Avalon Member Justplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2016
    Posts
    1,191
    Thanks
    3,231
    Thanked 6,544 times in 1,126 posts

    Default 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Planned Parenthood isn’t just about abortion. It’s about population control and eugenics, and it always has been. Margaret Sanger, founder of the American Birth Control League, now Planned Parenthood, focused on the poor, immigrants, disabled and other minority groups. These remain the primary target clientele for Planned Parenthood today. She believed there were too many of the wrong kind of people: “human weeds,” “reckless breeders,” “human beings who never should have been born.” She also said there should be “more children from the fit, less from the unfit—that is the chief aim of birth control.”

    https://www.humanlife.org/master-plan/


    The Jaffe Report for Planned Parenthood in 1969, referred to in the above report is not a hoax. It spells out the agenda to reduce US population, including promoting homosexuality, unlimited abortions, fertility control agents in water supply and taxing families:

    http://www.toomanyaborted.com/wp-con...Jaffe-Memo.pdf

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Justplain For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (16th December 2016), bluestflame (14th December 2016), Hervé (14th December 2016), lucidity (14th December 2016), Merlinus (8th March 2018), Nasu (14th December 2016), StandingWave (15th December 2016), Star Tsar (15th December 2016), TargeT (15th December 2016), The Freedom Train (14th December 2016), Vward (16th December 2016)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member lucidity's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2014
    Posts
    1,089
    Thanks
    1,029
    Thanked 4,749 times in 956 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Thanks for highlighting this Justplain.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lucidity For This Post:

    Nasu (14th December 2016), The Freedom Train (14th December 2016)

  5. Link to Post #3
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,715
    Thanks
    59,792
    Thanked 94,547 times in 15,425 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front
    It is more than that, eugenics is only a facet of the agenda... see this post (<---)
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    bluestflame (14th December 2016), Justplain (15th December 2016), Nasu (14th December 2016), StandingWave (15th December 2016), sunwings (14th December 2016)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Canada Avalon Member Justplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2016
    Posts
    1,191
    Thanks
    3,231
    Thanked 6,544 times in 1,126 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    Quote 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front
    It is more than that, eugenics is only a facet of the agenda... see this post (<---)
    Absolutely correct, Herve, in my own province the government has recently introduced a revised sex ed curriculum that is specifically grooming children for sex abuse, as per your post:

    "This story is really about preventing parents from protecting their children from sexual predators - including the State."

    The International Planned Parenthood Federation are now advocating the "right" to consent to sex acts become a plank the platform of the United Nations "Rights of the Child" Treaty. The international abortion NGO released two documents to be used by child sex advocates as part of a media blitz, directing children of any age to "explore avenues of sexuality", and directly attacking the protective role of the parents.

    This UN council plans on punishing "violators and abusers of the rights of the child" as defined by UN tribunal. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10319.doc.htm

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Justplain For This Post:

    Hervé (14th December 2016), Nasu (14th December 2016)

  9. Link to Post #5
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,715
    Thanks
    59,792
    Thanked 94,547 times in 15,425 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Yep!

    And in that same province of yours:

    One gay man's lonely fight against Ontario's new law banning 'mother' and 'father'

    By Barbara Kay National Post
    Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:25 UTC



    © Ernest Doroszuk/Postmedia Network; Joe Clark reacts after his microphone is turned off at a Pride Toronto event in August.

    LGBT rights and pro-pit-bull advocacy are niche passions for the Ontario NDP's Cheri DiNovo. The latter cause was my introduction to the MPP. Today's column is about the former, specifically the recently passed Bill 28, DiNovo's "All Families are Equal Act."

    Motivation for the bill was the aim of bringing legislative compliance to a 2006 judicial ruling, in the case of MDR v. Ontario, to stop requiring same-sex couples to adopt their own children if they used surrogates or reproductive technologies. That, Bill 28 does. It also allows parenting agreements among as many as four people.

    But DiNovo went further still. In deference to transgender activists' opposition to binary gender categories, her bill replaces most uses of the words "mother" and "father" in Ontario law, substituting for them "birth parent" and "parent." According to DiNovo, "the right of people to be called neither mother nor father" is "equally important" to the right to be called mother or father.

    Bill 28 passed not only without opposition from the province's Progressive Conservative party, but with its leader, Patrick Brown, demanding his MPPs skip the vote if they couldn't support it. This may explain why the newly elected MPP, 19-year-old Sam Oosterhoff, a social conservative, delayed his swearing-in until after the Nov 29 vote. Oosterhoff has publicly stated Bill 28 is "a horrible piece of legislation," and, on Facebook, that it is "poorly written" and "disrespectful to mothers and fathers."

    Because Oosterhoff is a socially conservative Christian, accusations of homophobia rained down on him. But there are like-minded others, such as Toronto activist Queenie Yu, who has voiced the hostility to Bill 28 from within parts of the Chinese community. "Chinese immigrants didn't expect the Wynne government would outdo the communists and get rid of mothers entirely," Yu said. She and Oosterhoff were hardly the only opponents of this bill.

    The hearings on the bill, for example, produced scarifying criticism from Joe Clark, a designer of digital technologies for the disabled and a writer. Clark described himself to me in a telephone interview as the "most unpopular gay man in Toronto" (among other maverick acts that have stigmatized him and even led to threats against him, Clark registered a complaint to Pride Toronto against Black Lives Matter for their disruptive actions in last summer's parade). He's a controversial polemicist and what he has to say makes Oosterhoff's comments look insipid by comparison.

    Clark calls Bill 28 "the Handmaid's Tale Act," referencing Margaret Atwood's dystopian novel in which women are coerced into bearing children for infertile theocratic elites. That's because it "literally rewrites motherhood and fatherhood," he says. "In fact, it redefines motherhood out of existence." Considering the mandate for the bill as it was originally circumscribed by the MDR ruling, Clark says that "in a classic example of scope creep ... this bill attempts to rewrite human biology."

    Mocking the transgender argument that people are whatever gender they feel they are — male, female, something in between, or none of the above — Clark refuses to concede longstanding facts of life: "Men don't have vaginas or female anatomy ... and women don't have penises," he says. "There are two sexes — two, not an unknown number." Clark also ridicules a change that Bill 28 will make to Ontario's Vital Statistics Act. Where it now reads "'birth means the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a fetus..." DiNovo is changing to "the complete expulsion or extraction from a person of a fetus..." It is, Clark says, as though a mother were, like Atwood's handmaids, "generic, bodiless, (and) sexless."

    Clark played hardball with the committee, but he had a point when he lectured the MPPs that they had never been elected or given a mandate to socially re-engineer the province. He testified: "you had one job: clearing up parental rights for gay and lesbian couples. Yet you arrogated the right to ... deny biological sex." Speaking to Di Novo, he reminded her, "Human biology did not change because you got elected to the Legislature, Ms. DiNovo..."
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Justplain (15th December 2016), Nasu (14th December 2016)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Canada Avalon Member Justplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2016
    Posts
    1,191
    Thanks
    3,231
    Thanked 6,544 times in 1,126 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Excellent find, Herve. This autumn we got a form from our daughter's school asking whether we were 'parent1' or 'parent2'. There are no references to mother or father in the whole document. Completely devoid of biological reality.

    The new sex-ed curriculum here teaches children of 8 years old the idea of 'gender fluidity' as if it were fact. You can choose your gender any time you want, or not at all, a totally unscientific, absurd idea, propogated by perverts. Transgenders, for instance, have an alarmingly high suicide rate just because you cant change your underlying gender.

    This sex ed curriculum teaches children to experiment with sex, to ignore parents as advisors, to explore masturbation and pornography, and does not emphasize the relationship between sex and love, nor the dangers of sexually transmitted diseases.

    So, planned parenthood (and likely homosexual organizations) are clearly promoting a long planned agenda to pervert governments and schools, as well as eugenicize minorities and the poor. This agenda weakens minorities, families and exposes children to risks of abuse and disease. Flying under the banner of protecting people's rights, this agenda, in general, makes the world a worse and less safe place.
    Last edited by Justplain; 15th December 2016 at 00:53.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Justplain For This Post:

    Hervé (15th December 2016), TargeT (15th December 2016)

  13. Link to Post #7
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,715
    Thanks
    59,792
    Thanked 94,547 times in 15,425 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Right...

    This is where this whole agenda is behind things like Pizzagate, CPS and the nanny state, Common Core, etc... it's just a way of installing psychopathy as the new "normal" for "well adjusted" citizens...
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (16th December 2016), Justplain (15th December 2016), TargeT (15th December 2016), Vward (16th December 2016)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Avalon Member bettye198's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th April 2010
    Location
    Laguna Niguel, CA - The Pearl of South Coast!
    Age
    71
    Posts
    571
    Thanks
    617
    Thanked 2,276 times in 463 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    We had just finished the last season of Knick and Eugenics was a sub theme. That the change of century 20th Century was the beginning of Medical Doctors bringing the idea of Eugenics into the Universities. They were so smug thinking about certain classes and races of people, did not matter the education should be not in the upper class mix, or the elite Medical community. This is a grand series on so many levels about surgery, the beginnings of how cocaine addict surgeons ruled and the corruption in NYC change of century. The opium dens and fraud. But to see black Medical Doctors with wisdom and skill banned, shunned was an eye opener. Eugenics in action!
    When you realize where you come from, you naturally become tolerant, disinterested, amused, kindhearted as a grandparent, dignified as a king. -- I Ching

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to bettye198 For This Post:

    Justplain (15th December 2016)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Canada Avalon Member Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th December 2016
    Location
    Southern Ontario, Canada
    Age
    46
    Posts
    180
    Thanks
    10,726
    Thanked 964 times in 172 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    "Absolutely correct, Herve, in my own province the government has recently introduced a revised sex ed curriculum that is specifically grooming children for sex abuse, as per your post:"

    Are you from Ontario? If you are please elaborate on why you think that? I am a teacher and quite familiar with the new curriculum and I feel most people are are ill informed. There is a lot of time spent on teaching children about their rights and consent and respect with regards to sexuality, so I feel it is quite the opposite.

    While Planned Parenthood could have a secret agenda, nothing surprises me. I personally know a lot of lovely social workers in my community who support some of the most vulnerable individuals in my area through that agency.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruno For This Post:

    DeDukshyn (15th December 2016), TargeT (15th December 2016)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,711 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Time for some good old Devils Advocate:

    So, I work with kids from the projects here in the USVI.

    From my experience, I'd totally support some sort of "parenting test" that must be passed before conception is approved; this would be tied to government benefits. If you want government benefits you MUST pass a COMPREHENSIVE parenting test, I'm talking psychological mostly, stress responses & a general agreed-on level of intelligence.

    In fact, I think this should be the avenue to receive most hand-outs; I think it could be crafted in a way that even studying for the test makes you a better person so it's a win/win all around. (want welfare? show that your a motivated individual that welfare will help improve your situation)

    0-6 is the MOST important time of a humans life; should that not be considered?

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    While Planned Parenthood could have a secret agenda, nothing surprises me. I personally know a lot of lovely social workers in my community who support some of the most vulnerable individuals in my area through that agency.
    My mom worked at Planned Parenthood for years, if there IS a secret agenda, it's nohting obvious that you would ever find in the facilities.

    If anything it's far more subtle than that & I agree that it may exist.. but it's nothing overt.
    Last edited by TargeT; 15th December 2016 at 13:48.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Bruno (15th December 2016), DeDukshyn (15th December 2016), loungelizard (15th December 2016)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Canada Avalon Member Justplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2016
    Posts
    1,191
    Thanks
    3,231
    Thanked 6,544 times in 1,126 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    "Absolutely correct, Herve, in my own province the government has recently introduced a revised sex ed curriculum that is specifically grooming children for sex abuse, as per your post:"

    Are you from Ontario? If you are please elaborate on why you think that? I am a teacher and quite familiar with the new curriculum and I feel most people are are ill informed. There is a lot of time spent on teaching children about their rights and consent and respect with regards to sexuality, so I feel it is quite the opposite.

    While Planned Parenthood could have a secret agenda, nothing surprises me. I personally know a lot of lovely social workers in my community who support some of the most vulnerable individuals in my area through that agency.
    Hi Bruno, yes i reside in Ontario, with an eight year old daughter. Here is a list of some of the most offensive components of the new Ontario sex-ed curriculum:

    a) Pg 92, Grade 1 (age 6) explicit lesson on sexual body parts (penis, testicles, vagina, vulva). This is far too young for children to be concerned about this stuff.
    b) pgs 124 + 231, Grade 3 (age 8) erroneous concept of 'gender fluidity' is taught, that the child's gender is a matter of choice. This is an unproven and dangerously confusing idea to plant in vulnerable young children's minds, and is based on dogma driven and not scientifically based ideas. Also at this stage the curriculum tries to normalize homosexual family structures in the child's minds without regard for the family's religious or moral beliefs. Sexual orientation is also raised, further confusing an issue that should only be discussed at a more mature age.
    c) pg 141, Grade 4 (age 9) The idea that dating is 'more than just friends. This is provoking young children to consider sex, otherwise why bring it up?
    d) pg 231, Grade 5 (age 10) 'gender is a stereotype, a social construct' ('gender expression' theory), as mentioned in (b) above, this is a dogma driven assertion not based upon any biological fact. This just confuses children. What's the purpose, to promote lbgt-ism?
    e) pg 175, grade 6 (age 11) vaginal lubrication is taught, then, masturbate to learn your body. Schools should not be teaching kids this crap.

    There is more, but this makes my point. Schools should concentrate on teaching children the basics, which they are getting worse and worse at doing (some schools dont even teach handwriting anymore, grammar is rarely taught, math scores are declining, etc), instead of trying to turn our children into permiscuous homosexuals.

    This type of sex-ed advances the agenda discussed above by Herve. It reduces parental rights and introduces controversial topics to children at a too early stage. If you read the Jaffe report you'll see that this agenda is long in the planning and needs to be stopped now.
    Last edited by Justplain; 15th December 2016 at 16:00.

  22. Link to Post #12
    Canada Avalon Member Justplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2016
    Posts
    1,191
    Thanks
    3,231
    Thanked 6,544 times in 1,126 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    Time for some good old Devils Advocate:

    So, I work with kids from the projects here in the USVI.

    From my experience, I'd totally support some sort of "parenting test" that must be passed before conception is approved; this would be tied to government benefits. If you want government benefits you MUST pass a COMPREHENSIVE parenting test, I'm talking psychological mostly, stress responses & a general agreed-on level of intelligence.

    In fact, I think this should be the avenue to receive most hand-outs; I think it could be crafted in a way that even studying for the test makes you a better person so it's a win/win all around. (want welfare? show that your a motivated individual that welfare will help improve your situation)

    0-6 is the MOST important time of a humans life; should that not be considered?

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    While Planned Parenthood could have a secret agenda, nothing surprises me. I personally know a lot of lovely social workers in my community who support some of the most vulnerable individuals in my area through that agency.
    My mom worked at Planned Parenthood for years, if there IS a secret agenda, it's nohting obvious that you would ever find in the facilities.

    If anything it's far more subtle than that & I agree that it may exist.. but it's nothing overt.
    Hi Target, although i understand that there are troubled people who have difficulties with properly raising children, and i understand you are playing the contrarian role, i just cant agree with the government determining who should or shouldnt have children. I would support the idea of government paid courses and counsellors for parents who need the help or guidance in parenting. I also see there is a need for government agencies to rescue children from troubled, deeply impoverished or abusive situations. However, the rights of parents are high on the priority list, just below the child's safety. I dont like the government administering a 'test' that can be rigged and/or unfair.

    Personally, i feel that proper child rearing is probably one of the most noble things an adult can do in life. The government should facilitate and support the parents in this regard, and not be a drill sergeant. I believe in the future, when technology permits, on a positive timeline that i hope/believe we are on, there wont be the poverty we see now, and people will be able to live independent of the nanny state, but until then we need to support the most vulnerable, which includes children and the poor. That's my position, anyways.

  23. Link to Post #13
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,715
    Thanks
    59,792
    Thanked 94,547 times in 15,425 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    What all this is designed to hide is outlined here:

    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    Since these "things" are on the rise and on the news... this thread will give you an idea as to where they are originating and the blue print/template for any country world wide.

    This thread is also a follow up on this other one: "While you were out... business as usual."

    [...]

    Georgetown University should be called CIA U. The mental research facility is not on the main campus near the regular college students. It is on a separate piece of land that makes it harder to run away from. The name of it is not Georgetown, but it is part of Georgetown University.

    [...]

    Teachers were particularly good at distinguishing control kids from experimental kids, and a number of teachers near that facility were killed by the CIA—on the order of a dozen in a decade.

    The second piece of disinformation that the CIA primed therapists around the world have dispended is that it is "normal" for kids to act out in their teenage years by cross-dressing. It turned out that just the opposite is true of normal teenagers. They want to define their sexual identity and not cross dress.

    Teenagers are the most intolerant to cross dressing per CIA research. Unless of course, they are mind control subjects and have been trained to sexually please chicken hawks by boys dressing as girls. There is no market for girls dressed as boys so the cross dressing only goes in one direction.

    Surprisingly, the CIA research showed that homosexual boys rarely cross dressed on their own at that age - unless they had been used by porn filmmakers, chicken hawks and mind controllers. So the presence of cross-dressing in a teenage boy is highly predictive that he is a mind control or abuse victim.

    The third piece of disinformation that the CIA fed therapists in journals to fool them and the parents is a bit subtler. The disinformation said "There is no normal age at which children should be told about sex. Sex education can occur at any age — it is up to the parents to decide. And sex education may be bad for kids so maybe we shouldn’t have it in our schools..."

    The CIA spent a lot of money to convince parents, churches, and schools not to have real sex education classes. The reason was that when kids were allowed to freely talk in a group about their sexual experiences or fantasies or theories of sex, the kids themselves could see that some of them had very different levels of exposure to and sophistication in these matters.

    So if sex education had to be taught the CIA wanted canned talks in which the kids were not allowed to talk. It thus trained sex educators to control the amount kids could talk and tried to make it taboo for the kids to talk to each other afterwards.

    The CIA also found out that there was a best age for sex education –about the start of puberty. So then they fostered some campaigns to force the education to be earlier. The reason for that was that some young child whose native curiosity would not lead to sophisticated knowledge of sexual action, were coming out with it in front of parents and therapists.

    It was better for the CIA if they could say that the kid learned it in a sex education class than from CIA prostitution of them. So although it sounds contradictory, the CIA’s bottom line on sex education disinformation was—don’t have sex education classes, but if you must have them have them very early and don’t let kids talk at them. Make it a more taboo subject by the way you skirt it or only allow it to be taught in a very short segment and never referred to again.

    The CIA sponsored conferences for sex educators under a front company call “First Dating Experiences” if I remember correctly. Or maybe just “First Experiences”. When the abstinence only people objected the name of the front company was called something like “Wait for Marriage, Inc."

    It was the same front. The same staff, address etc. The CIA also pushes abstinence and marital fidelity fronts while not practicing these things themselves. It does that to increase the effectiveness of its blackmail ops.

    Sexual blackmail only works when the society is condemning towards others. It is not the abstinence of fidelity that the CIA is after, it is the condemning of others it is after.

    Condemning is a form of hate and the CIA provokes hate and condemning as a way of controlling others. It is a mind control technique that can then be used to get people to fight wars etc against their best interests.

    The CIA is looking for “handles” into a person’s psyche—an emotional issue that drives a person to act. Then it exploits it. It also creates handles by funding songs and lyrics into existence. That is another whole level of mind control directed at a population instead of individuals.

    [...]
    In stark business terms: the "market" has grown exponentially to an international and worldwide network since those days of early CIA experiments...


    PS: Check this post as well: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1120709
    Last edited by Hervé; 15th December 2016 at 17:04.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Justplain (15th December 2016)

  25. Link to Post #14
    Canada Avalon Member DeDukshyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2011
    Location
    From 100 Mile House ;-)
    Language
    English
    Age
    45
    Posts
    7,738
    Thanks
    24,820
    Thanked 32,112 times in 6,926 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    "It was better for the CIA if they could say that the kid learned it in a sex education class than from CIA prostitution of them"

    So sex ed in schools and teaching the current and ever changing "gender" landscape is just a way for CIA to groom children so they can prostitute them? I wonder how many timews my kids have already been prostituted by the CIA ... this sounds serious ... Millions of kids in Canada ... all groomed by the CIA for sexual pleasure? I think this thread needs some "back to reality" ... It's one thing to not accept the changes to sex-ed in schools due to personal religious values, it's quite another to call it a program for the CIA to groom children for their prostitution purposes. I think this discussion needs some cohesion.
    When you are one step ahead of the crowd, you are a genius.
    Two steps ahead, and you are deemed a crackpot.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to DeDukshyn For This Post:

    TargeT (15th December 2016)

  27. Link to Post #15
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,711 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote Posted by Justplain (here)
    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    Time for some good old Devils Advocate:

    So, I work with kids from the projects here in the USVI.

    From my experience, I'd totally support some sort of "parenting test" that must be passed before conception is approved; this would be tied to government benefits. If you want government benefits you MUST pass a COMPREHENSIVE parenting test, I'm talking psychological mostly, stress responses & a general agreed-on level of intelligence.
    Hi Target, although i understand that there are troubled people who have difficulties with properly raising children, and i understand you are playing the contrarian role, i just cant agree with the government determining who should or shouldnt have children. I would support the idea of government paid courses and counsellors for parents who need the help or guidance in parenting. I also see there is a need for government agencies to rescue children from troubled, deeply impoverished or abusive situations. However, the rights of parents are high on the priority list, just below the child's safety. I dont like the government administering a 'test' that can be rigged and/or unfair.
    I agree, (I worded it awkwardly above..) that's why I would tie it to government hand outs..... People that are responsible enough to handle their own lives, financially and otherwise are PROBABLY more likely to be successful parents.

    I am being very targeted in my approach here, that's why I mentioned the Projects; these areas need help... and not the kind of "help" they've been getting (hand outs make people WORSE, a bit of struggle & motivation is the only way humans grow and prosper). These neighborhoods literally churn out a lot of the problems that are sited by society ("not all" of course, there are some great kids too) due to the conditions and attitudes of the residents, the "culture" as it were.

    Quote Posted by Justplain (here)
    Personally, i feel that proper child rearing is probably one of the most noble things an adult can do in life.
    And one of the greatest trusts, an action that is still nearly completely free of government control, and also free of education, free of monitoring and "care-free" as long as the rest of us don't see the abuse/neglect & sometimes intellectual poison (Thug life)... PIZZAGATE would not be allowed to happen had good parents been involved.

    [QUOTE=Justplain;1120723]The government should facilitate and support the parents in this regard, and not be a drill sergeant.

    Yes, and no...

    If you want hand outs (and I'm even talking child tax credits here... any hand outs) you better be willing and able to show that you are capable of using that help to raise a healthy individual.

    I do so much for my kids already, there's no way I would hesitate to go through it (I have 6 kids, that's a lot of tax credits... haha)

    Quote Posted by Justplain (here)
    I believe in the future, when technology permits, on a positive timeline that i hope/believe we are on, there wont be the poverty we see now, and people will be able to live independent of the nanny state, but until then we need to support the most vulnerable, which includes children and the poor. That's my position, anyways.
    SOME of it is poverty like.. a tiny fraction.

    MOST of it is perspective... the poorest person in the US is richer by far than any homeless person I saw in Central America or the middle east (never saw any there, or perhaps they were just hard to distinguish from the local villagers, they were all dirt poor) Yet among these communities I found caring thoughtful people with a STRONG family mind (the middle east is far more family/community oriented than we (USA) are, I just don't like what they DO with that orientation).


    I have little faith in large swaths of the population however.







    Quote Posted by DeDukshyn (here)
    I think this discussion needs some cohesion.
    or at least, grounding

    And I highly doubt the conclusions above are correct.


    Sex is such a weird topic in a country funded by Protestants... But I don't think there's some grand "prostitution grooming" scheme going on, just an uncomfortable topic that many MANY people have different views on (privately held views).
    Last edited by TargeT; 15th December 2016 at 17:49.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    DeDukshyn (15th December 2016)

  29. Link to Post #16
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,715
    Thanks
    59,792
    Thanked 94,547 times in 15,425 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote the kids themselves could see that some of them had very different levels of exposure to and sophistication in these matters.
    ... someone lost the plot while climbing on high horses
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  30. Link to Post #17
    Canada Avalon Member Justplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2016
    Posts
    1,191
    Thanks
    3,231
    Thanked 6,544 times in 1,126 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Hi Target, i dont disagree that someone should earn their 'handouts', i believe welfare in ontario has some sort of work component, and they even have a minimum guaranteed income for the working poor, which i think is marvellous. For parents, i would more empgasize offering parenting classes and couselling. Unfortunately a lot of the child rearing 'theory' is nonsense. The best theory we found was by a Dr. Lehman who ties rewards with good behaviour.

    I am not with you, however, on poor people proving they are good parents unless they have shown an incapacity through abuse or maltreatment.

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to Justplain For This Post:

    TargeT (15th December 2016)

  32. Link to Post #18
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    40
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,711 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote Posted by Justplain (here)
    I am not with you, however, on poor people proving they are good parents unless they have shown an incapacity through abuse or maltreatment.
    Then they shouldn't be poor and trying to start a family. If they want to have a family, fine; no government subsidy untill you complete a Psyc. eval and show that you are a responsible parent (this is normal for any business, you want to make sure you are paying for something beneficial, not detrimental).

    Basically no-free lunch for the capable.

    I'm trying to create a situation that encourages motivation and proper behavior.. the current system often encourages the opposite; as I said I work with these project kids, know most of their parents.. it's THIS situation specifically I am speaking of not "all" low / zero income families... after a few months you start to see the "real" side of their family lives (and since I work with their kids, I see it in their behaviors.. often quit self-destructive).

    what is your solution?
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  33. Link to Post #19
    Canada Avalon Member DeDukshyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2011
    Location
    From 100 Mile House ;-)
    Language
    English
    Age
    45
    Posts
    7,738
    Thanks
    24,820
    Thanked 32,112 times in 6,926 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    ...

    Quote Posted by DeDukshyn (here)
    I think this discussion needs some cohesion.
    or at least, grounding

    And I highly doubt the conclusions above are correct.


    Sex is such a weird topic in a country funded by Protestants... But I don't think there's some grand "prostitution grooming" scheme going on, just an uncomfortable topic that many MANY people have different views on (privately held views).
    Thanks,

    Grounding might be a better word. There is content here for valid discussion - I'm not denying that, but I see a mishmash pile of facts mixed with, speculation, straw grasping, opinions, beliefs, and religious principles - it needs some dire distinctions for frutful discussion - I just don't have time to contribute a proper perspective in text -- it would be a few long posts ...
    When you are one step ahead of the crowd, you are a genius.
    Two steps ahead, and you are deemed a crackpot.

  34. The Following User Says Thank You to DeDukshyn For This Post:

    TargeT (15th December 2016)

  35. Link to Post #20
    Germany Avalon Member
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    SW Germany
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,717
    Thanks
    2,294
    Thanked 8,671 times in 1,614 posts

    Default Re: 'Planned Parenthood' is a Eugenics Front

    planed parenthood/the promotion of same-sex intimate relationships as a priority life-style/feminism (all to stop pro-creation) has always been a ploy of the globalist elite to absolutely destroy all family values and de-populate the world- this is nothing new- read David Icke for starters on this concept-

    be well all-

    Larry

  36. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cardillac For This Post:

    Justplain (15th December 2016), TargeT (15th December 2016)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts