Vatican calls for "taxation measures on financial transactions"

[ThePythonicCow]

The Vatican calls for "taxation measures on financial transactions", as as noted in an article entitled Vatican Calls For Central World Bank To Be Set Up Across The Globe.

It's not the World Bank that dismays me -- we already have that, literally the World Bank, as well as the Bank of International Settlements, which has served in pretty much that role for nearly a century now.

It's the call for "taxation measures on financial transactions" that dismays me.

How more pervasive and intrusive can you get? Taxing all transactions of course justifies and requires surveilling all transactions (can't let some escape their tax payment, can you?).

Moreover, this leads to a global authority deciding which transactions are allowed, in the name of fighting terrorism or whatever is the boogey man of the day ... and if your child hasn't done his homework, guess that means his allowance is not allowed this week either.

This must not happen.

[ThePythonicCow]

Dang - this is "old" news. I should have researched it more carefully, though my dismay still applies.

The phrase "taxation measures on financial transactions" apparently comes from this October 2011 document Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority.

The text of this 2011 document is here:


Section 4 of that document contains this passage:

===========

On the basis of this sort of ethical approach, it seems advisable to reflect, for example, on:

a) taxation measures on financial transactions with fair rates modulated in proportion to the complexity of operations, especially those made on the “secondary” market. Such taxation would be very useful in promoting global development and sustainability according to the principles of social justice and solidarity. It could also contribute to the creation of a world reserve fund to support the economies of the countries hit by crisis as well as the recovery of their monetary and financial systems;

b) forms of recapitalization of banks with public funds, making the support conditional on “virtuous” behaviours aimed at developing the “real economy”;

c) the definition of the two domains of ordinary credit and of Investment Banking. This distinction would allow a more effective management of the “shadow markets” which have no controls and limits.On the basis of this sort of ethical approach, it seems advisable to reflect, for example, on:

===========

The hidden Jesuit hand is deeply evident to me in this work. Note that the first Jesuit pope, Pope Francis, did not become pope until March 2013, two years after this document was published.

[ThePythonicCow]

According to this presentation in Feb 2014 by Cardinal Peter K. A. Turkson to the London School of Economics, Pope Benedict delayed two years before publishing the above document: Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems (pdf) document.

The plans for global monetary control run deep, and have a long history. The Internet is providing them a wonderful (</sarcasm>) opportunity to advance their plans to anyone who can afford a cell phone.

[wnlight]

Paul,
Thanks for sharing that old news. It is still timely, and I had not seen it before. This shows the hand of the Vatican (once again) in its desire for evil, world domination.
Warren

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by wnlight (here)
Paul,
Thanks for sharing that old news. It is still timely, and I had not seen it before. This shows the hand of the Vatican (once again) in its desire for evil, world domination.
Warren

I might suggest that the Vatican (and some other major institutions) are the gloves, hiding the hand of some elite that we know only indirectly, by such names as the Jesuits.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
The Internet is providing them a wonderful (</sarcasm>) opportunity to advance their plans to anyone who can afford a cell phone.

Tracking our financial transactions is one of the more pervasive ways in which the elite bastards keep track of us. Zerohedge just posted a good article, describing more of these ways; How Globalists Predict Your Behavior.

[shaberon]

This is a strange one.

I notice in the original article they believe it will be a pleasant idea to "Occupy" movements and the like; perhaps because they refer to making a "Public" institution. They then basically say the IMF isn't...doing such a great job...and you'd have to say that place isn't very public.

The "financial transactions" aren't defined, it sounds like they mean bank-to-bank types of things. Not sure. Given that this backup plan has been around for a few years, they may have been scrambling to compete with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which itself is probably going to sweep the IMF into the dustbin. At the same time, they make it sound like they've never heard of the Bank of International Settlements.

So in a way, their "money talk" probably *could be* appealing if you really look at some of their comments--the upswing of that at the end of the article is the necessity of all nations surrendering part of their power to a world authority. So that has Jesuit fingerprints all over it. A red hot poker in the eye is my answer.

[naste.de.lumina]

The way I see it (and I may be mistaken), to achieve this goal, they would have to be able to break the encryption of the blockchain (bitcoin).

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
The way I see it (and I may be mistaken), to achieve this goal, they would have to be able to break the encryption of the blockchain (bitcoin).

As with encryption, "they" don't have to break the basic mathematical algorithms, but rather compromise all major uses of such technology sufficiently that almost nothing escapes their notice and control.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by shaberon (here)
This is a strange one

Several excellent points - thanks!

[ThePythonicCow]

By accident, I came across another reference to taxing financial transactions.

In this video, Robert Steele, being interviewed by Jeff Rense[/url], speaks in favor of something called the Automated Payment Transaction (APT) tax, a universal tax on all financial transactions to replace sundry other taxes. It would replace income, fuel, sales, excise, estate, and other taxes.

I suppose if some financial transactions could be done using block chain technology, then all legal financial block chains would also have to collect this tax, a fraction of one percent, on each movement. For example, it would cost me that tax to move cryptocurrency from my small wallet that I use for transactions with others, and my (slightly) larger wallet that I keep offline for "cold" storage.

[lucidity]

Posted by Paul (here)
The Vatican calls for "taxation measures on financial transactions", as as noted in an article entitled Vatican Calls For Central World Bank To Be Set Up Across The Globe.

It's not the World Bank that dismays me -- we already have that, literally the World Bank, as well as the Bank of International Settlements, which has served in pretty much that role for nearly a century now.

It's the call for "taxation measures on financial transactions" that dismays me.

How more pervasive and intrusive can you get? Taxing all transactions of course justifies and requires surveilling all transactions (can't let some escape their tax payment, can you?).

Moreover, this leads to a global authority deciding which transactions are allowed, in the name of fighting terrorism or whatever is the boogey man of the day ... and if your child hasn't done his homework, guess that means his allowance is not allowed this week either.

This must not happen.

This looks very much like an illuminati ploy to arrive at a one world (tyrannical) government.
Maybe this suggestion is telling us that the globalists and the Vatican are reading from the
same satanic agenda.

[shaberon]

The Jesuits have been doing that for nearly 500 years. Any and all other plots are only following in their wake.

The 2011 document is from Georgetown--one of their puppy kennels. That points me in the direction that: this is not a joke, and they may be able to craft a sales pitch that will be successful with enough people, so that dissenting opinions will turn to dust in the wind. Twenty years down the road it will be accepted as the new status quo.

So it's worth looking for where this might be going, or who's getting into it...otherwise, one day it will be a done deal that puts on an act of going through some kind of vote.

[naste.de.lumina]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
The way I see it (and I may be mistaken), to achieve this goal, they would have to be able to break the encryption of the blockchain (bitcoin).

As with encryption, "they" don't have to break the basic mathematical algorithms, but rather compromise all major uses of such technology sufficiently that almost nothing escapes their notice and control.

You are quite right at this point my friend.

But it could be like a cat running to get the mouse.

Posted by Paul (here)

I suppose if some financial transactions could be done using block chain technology, then all legal financial block chains would also have to collect this tax, a fraction of one percent, on each movement. For example, it would cost me that tax to move cryptocurrency from my small wallet that I use for transactions with others, and my (slightly) larger wallet that I keep offline for "cold" storage.

In order to achieve this goal, 'they' would have to be able to impose this 'fee levy' on all those who currently participate in 'transaction validations' and also on those who may come in the future. Theoretically, today anyone can choose to do so.

'They' will have to be able to control the processing power capacity that many individuals working together can produce (processors and power available),

As I said before, a cat running to get the mouse.

A curiosity.

The letter 'B' that makes up the symbol looks like the junction of numbers 1 and 3.


Remembering that the Jesuit Jorge Mario Bergoglio aka Francis Pope, chose the number 13 as 'his', so to speak, when choosing the day => 03/13/2013 to introduce himself to his 'lambs'.

As I said in an earlier post, the concept behind the blockchain implies DACs (decentralized autonomous corporations). Each 'device' connected to the blockchain is a DAC. Just like the cells of the human body.

In my opinion, the 'entities' responsible in practice for the implementation of the Bitcoin concept, possesses privileged knowledge. I do not rule out the possibility that the 'Vatican' is behind the 'phenomenon' Bitcoin.

For those who truly command the pyramid top, the 'owner of the eye', time is a 'detail' and their agendas look far.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by shaberon (here)
The 2011 document is from Georgetown--one of their puppy kennels. That points me in the direction that: this is not a joke

Agreed.

And the APT link that I added in another post above adds more weight to this "tax all financial transations" proposal.

And with more wide spread use of block chain technology (under the control of financial institutions and government law), just paying $2.50 for a Starbucks coffee would be a "financial transation", between my account at Bank A, and Starbuck's account, at Bank B.

[Pam]

Why in the world does the Vatican think they have any say in this? They are supposed to be a religion. Jesus threw the moneymakers out of the temple, so they have come full circle. Well, I guess the cat is totally and completely out of the bag.

[sdv]

Personally, I think the Vatican should stick to prayer and running soup kitchens!

Realistically, the Vatican is deeply involved with the elite through the Vatican Bank.

[East Sun]

Total evil took over the "holy" Roman catholic church with the conception of the jesuits.

People hate being deceived so we will end them one way or another, eventually........

[araucaria]

Posted by Paul (here)
The Vatican calls for "taxation measures on financial transactions", as as noted in an article entitled Vatican Calls For Central World Bank To Be Set Up Across The Globe.

It's not the World Bank that dismays me -- we already have that, literally the World Bank, as well as the Bank of International Settlements, which has served in pretty much that role for nearly a century now.

It's the call for "taxation measures on financial transactions" that dismays me.

How more pervasive and intrusive can you get? Taxing all transactions of course justifies and requires surveilling all transactions (can't let some escape their tax payment, can you?).

Moreover, this leads to a global authority deciding which transactions are allowed, in the name of fighting terrorism or whatever is the boogey man of the day ... and if your child hasn't done his homework, guess that means his allowance is not allowed this week either.

This must not happen.

Perhaps it would be appropriate, the mistake in post #1 having been corrected in post #2, to take another look at the originally incriminated article referenced above. It contains nothing that I for one would not agree with, provided its recommendations were implemented in a manner serving the public interest.

and if your child hasn't done his homework, guess that means his allowance is not allowed this week either

A little over the top, don’t you think? What has a kid’s pocket money to do with taxing bank transactions? Also the taxation = surveillance equation is not automatic. You can have either one without the other. You pay sales tax on cash transactions in a store. And many people draw up their own income statement; they can declare what they like – and many do – until they get found out. It could be argued, and there is evidence to indicate that a little more surveillance on tax evasion might be a very effective way of getting money back in ordinary people’s pockets where it belongs.

[Cardillac]

all religious insitutions are tax-exempt, including the Vatican-

the Vatican bank is a major money-laundering back (gosh)

as Jordan Maxwell has often stated: "all the woes of the world can be attributed to the Vatican"-

Larry

[wnlight]

Help me out here. I cannot understand why this thread is discussing the mechanics of such a diabolic method of taxation. No nation should ever agree to it. How would this tax money be used? Yes, I read the "Section 4" in Paul's second post, but who decides how this money is used? The Vatican? The UN? In who's pocket does this money reside? Seems to me pretty easy to embezzle. This also looks like taxation without representation. This form of taxation appears to be a creature that could easily grow in amount and in scope once it had become universally accepted. I personally think that any transaction taxation should remain within the scope and control of each individual, sovereign nation. There is no ideal tax collection, but it is better to keep control as close to the people being taxed as is possible. BTW, What makes you so sure that the bitcoin encryption hasn't already been cracked by TPTB?