-
5th April 2017 06:14
Link to Post #1
What's going on with all the new whistleblowers (See for yourself)
I've got some fantastic news, that is, for those with eyes to see. I'm not telling you what to conclude but rather where to look and then make up your own mind.
It was a mystery to me, up until now, how categorically some people's testimony was denied any validity beyond having been copied from someone else. Now I've got a theory to present to you and you decide what's true.
Let's focus on the big picture. Really, just for now, look at the overall big picture .
When someone tells you he had worked for decades for some very dark forces and got messed with heavily what's more reasonable to assume: A flawless presention of his situation that might incriminate him or plenty of holes to poke at?
There is a huge group of people, all having done great research work, with integrity and a lot of dilligence - among them are David Wilcock, Michael Salla and Jay Weidner. What's more reasonable to believe: That they all sold out, were tricked... or that they indeed encountered someone telling truth as good as he can?
The human mind, when presented with new information, can handle only so much of a gap. This is absolutely natural and important for feeling secure. If the difference is too big, the information too unbelievable, it will be discarded. It simply cannot be true. It is not allowed to be true.
What's more likely now: That people, encountering such huge gaps in their own world view compared to the reality these new whistleblowers convey are making logical conclusions... or that they are defending their sanity, the integrity of their minds by finding fault in these whistleblower's testimonies so they can discard them completely never to be looked at again?
Yes, some people might have been on some payrolls. Some might have done pretty bad things. Some might still be involved with subjects no honest person would want to get involved in. They might still be very human though and have a conscience that prods them to do the best they can in the situation they are in.
What's more reasonable to do when listening to their stories: Dismiss it all, simply out of principle because of previous mistakes or pay attention, discern and see how it fits with other sources?
What's more likely true: That someone can be programmed with over 50 hours of perfectly collaborating information with endless tiny details... ... ... or that he indeed experienced something along those lines and recounts from memory, after having had it wiped, to the best of his abilities?
What makes more sense to you: That different people with coherent stories that overlap in certain areas copy each other to gain fame and money... or that they simply experienced the same thing?
Would you rather: Earn a couple of bucks telling your truth because the world needs to hear it for the benefit of all while getting attacked endlessly by people defending their minds equilibrium or work in a McDonalds?
The last one was a test to see whether you are still with us.
Now a big one.
Is it more likely, from your perspective, that there is this huge concentrated effort of countless people having been brainwashed, with perfect information that they can collaborate in an effort to discredit a gullible population or is the rise in consciousness bringing true witnesses forward who, despite all attacks, put their necks out for the good of humanity?
---
Actions, beliefs, projections and thoughts... all can be categorized into two very basic groups: Fear and Love.
Whatever is more likely to you will consist of a choice between Fear and Love and naturally move you further in that direction.
It's your choice. Your future. You decide what reality you live in.
Last edited by Akeron; 5th April 2017 at 06:18.
-
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Akeron For This Post:
6pounder (5th April 2017), AndrejPeĉënkin (6th April 2017), chanda (5th April 2017), conk (5th April 2017), fourty-two (7th April 2017), ghostrider (6th April 2017), heretogrow (5th April 2017), Inversion (5th April 2017), Mercedes (5th April 2017), Nasu (5th April 2017), Noelle (5th April 2017), toppy (5th April 2017), TraineeHuman (5th April 2017)
-
5th April 2017 09:34
Link to Post #2