+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    17th December 2010
    Location
    Alberta - Canada
    Posts
    774
    Thanks
    907
    Thanked 4,381 times in 699 posts

    Default The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Hello Everyone:
    When you read this article you have to wonder what else the Russians have designed! They are masters of engineering. Credit doesn't seem to be given to them for this type of technology. I am impressed by their ability to design high tech equipment.
    An interesting read.
    chancy

    Link:
    http://newsweek.com/us-russia-nuclear-arms-race-over-and-russia-has-won-581704


    Article:
    The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won
    By Scott Ritter On 4/12/17 at 12:10 AM

    This article first appeared on The Washington Spectator.

    In October 26, 2016, amid the hubbub of a rancorous American presidential election that dominated the headlines, an event took place in Russia that escaped the attention of those not otherwise involved in monitoring the esoteric world of strategic weapons research and development.

    This event, a test of a ballistic missile carrying a payload known as “Object 4202,” fundamentally changed the landscape of arms control, built as it is on the dual pillars of nuclear deterrence and missile defense.

    “Object 4202” was a new kind of weapon, a hypersonic warhead capable of speeds 15 times the speed of sound, and capable of evading any anti-missile system the United States has today, or may develop and deploy for decades to come. While the October 26 test used an older RS-26 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) as the launch vehicle, “Object 4202” will ultimately be carried on a newer ICBM, the RS-28.

    The RS-28 is itself a wonder of modern technology, capable of flying in excess of five times the speed of sound, altering its trajectory to confuse anti-missile radars, and delivering 15 independently targetable nuclear warheads (each one 10 times as powerful as the bombs the United States dropped on Japan at the end of World War II) or three “Object 4202” hypersonic warheads, which destroy their targets through kinetic energy (i.e., through impact).

    A nuclear warhead-armed RS-28 would take about 30 minutes to reach the United States from a silo in central Russia; its warheads would be capable of destroying an area about the size of Texas.

    Armed with the “Object 4202” hypersonic warheads, each of which is capable of destroying an American missile silo, the time would be cut down to 12 minutes or less. The RS-28 ICBM, scheduled to become operational in 2018, assures Russia the ability to annihilate the United States in retaliation for any American first strike, while providing Russia a silo-killing first-strike capability of its own.

    Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia has relied on the threat of massive nuclear retaliation as the foundation of its nuclear deterrence strategy, grounded in the notion of “mutually assured destruction,” where any nuclear strike by one side would result in a devastating response by the other, thereby reducing the chance of nuclear war.



    A sailor stands on the Russian Kuzbass nuclear submarine in Vladivostok, Russia, on July 30, 2016. Scott Ritter writes that every missile system Russia deploys, or will deploy, is capable of defeating America’s missile defense systems, including what is currently deployed and what is envisioned for the future. And Russia is on the verge of completing the deployment of its own anti-missile shield, one that will seal off its air space to bombers, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, negating in totality America’s nuclear triad.

    The glue that held this theory of mutual nuclear suicide together was the 1972 anti-ballistic missile (ABM) treaty, where the Soviet Union and the United States agreed to limitations on the deployment of anti-missile defenses. An effective ABM capability gave a nation the theoretical ability to “win” a nuclear war by launching a debilitating first strike, and then destroying in-flight any missiles that survived. Limiting ABM defenses curtailed an arms race by reducing the impetus to develop new weapons capable of breaching an opponent’s defenses.

    The ABM treaty provided a foundation of strategic stability, built on the precepts of “mutually assured destruction,” that enabled both the United States and the Soviet Union to enter into meaningful arms reduction agreements, including the ground-breaking Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty of 1987, and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty of 1991. (Ironically, it was President Ronald Reagan’s insistence in 1986 on continuing the research on the “Star Wars” anti-missile system that precluded the possibility of eliminating nuclear weapons altogether.)

    This trend toward nuclear disarmament continued in the decade following the collapse of the Soviet Union, with President Bill Clinton signing a new START 2 treaty with Russian President Boris Yeltsin in 1993. START 2 eliminated the deployment of multiple warheads on ICBMs, further stabilizing the strategic balance between the two nations.

    The START 2 treaty never entered into force. In 2002, George W. Bush’s administration withdrew from the ABM Treaty, citing the need to develop defenses against missile launches from so-called “rogue states,” like Iraq, Iran and North Korea. In doing so Bush unhinged the foundation upon which U.S.-Russian strategic arms control was built.

    A new arms reduction treaty, signed in 2003, stripped away on-site, inspection-based verification, and did nothing to limit the deployment of ICBMs armed with multiple warheads. While the “New START Treaty,” signed by the Obama administration in 2010, brought back limited on-site inspections, there was no prohibition against ICBMs with multiple warheads.

    Moreover, the Obama administration continued to develop and deploy anti-missile defenses, both in the United States and in Europe, resurrecting in Russia Cold War-era concerns that the Americans would leverage this new ABM capability to subject Russia to nuclear blackmail, threatening a nuclear strike for which Russia would have no response. The RS-28 missile system, inclusive of “Object 4202,” can trace its origin to American deployment of ABMs.

    These concerns were on display on December 22, 2016, when President Vladimir Putin delivered a speech that made the recent Russian developments public. “We need to strengthen the military potential of [Russia’s] strategic nuclear forces,” Putin said, “especially with missile complexes that can reliably penetrate any existing and prospective missile defense systems.”

    This speech would have more than likely been buried by the American media save for one person—President-elect Donald Trump, who on the same day as Putin’s speech tweeted a reply: “The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes.”

    The president-in-waiting then doubled down on this line of thinking, telling the hosts of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program the following morning, “Let it be an arms race! We will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all.”

    The Russian response was surprisingly muted. Russia, Putin said the following day, was not seeking a new arms race, but only to improve its capabilities in the face of American deployments of anti-missile defenses. Russia was now strong enough to repulse any aggressor, Putin said.

    “As for Donald Trump, there is nothing new about it; during his election campaign he said the U.S. needs to bolster its nuclear capabilities and its armed forces in general,” the Russian president noted.

    During the campaign, candidate Trump had been infamously unfamiliar with the basics of American nuclear strategy. At a primary debate, after the moderator underscored the age of America’s nuclear arsenal (“The B-52s [a nuclear-capable bomber] are older than I am. The missiles are old. The submarines are aging out”), Trump was asked, “What’s your priority among our nuclear triad?” The best the future president could come up with was, “I think…I think, for me, nuclear is just the power, the devastation is very important to me.”

    There is no doubt that Trump received a more detailed briefing on America’s nuclear capability upon being elected. The aging American nuclear arsenal, he would have learned, is a critical national security issue. A new stealth bomber is in development, as is a new class of ballistic-missile submarines. And the Obama administration had initiated a process for producing and deploying a new ground-launched ICBM that would cost the American public $1 trillion over the course of the next decade.

    This perceived weakness, combined with Putin’s public pronouncement of Russian strength, apparently was enough to set the president-elect off on his tweeting and morning talk show rant.

    A few days shy of his inauguration, Trump seemed to have a change of heart. In a wide-ranging interview with British journalists, Trump noted that, “They have sanctions on Russia—let’s see if we can make some good deals with Russia.” What deal was Trump suggesting? “For one thing, I think nuclear weapons should be way down and reduced very substantially, that’s part of it. But Russia’s hurting very badly right now because of sanctions, but I think something can happen that a lot of people are going to benefit.”

    (The Times of London speculated that the first foreign policy trip President Trump would embark on would be a nuclear disarmament summit with President Putin; a Trump spokesperson rejected this as “false news.”)

    While President Putin, in a January 28 phone call with President Trump, was warm to the idea of nuclear disarmament talks with a Trump administration, the Russians overall were dismissive of a deal that traded disarmament for the lifting of sanctions.

    An offer to engage in nuclear arms control talks, Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov noted, would be furthered by first reviewing the issue of U.S. sanctions against Russia. But there could not be any direct linkage between the two.

    The Russian foreign minister also noted that the agenda for any such negotiations should include hypersonic weapons, U.S. missile defenses, space weapons and nuclear testing—in short, a broad range of interconnected issues that the new Trump administration appears ill-equipped to handle at this juncture.

    Rex Tillerson, the new secretary of state, has been silent on U.S.-Russian nuclear disarmament. And James Mattis, the new secretary of defense and the one Trump Cabinet official who has opined publicly about disarmament issues, appears supportive of fielding a new land-based ICBM, thereby closing the door on the possibility of trading those weapons in exchange for similarly deep cuts by Russia. In his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mattis noted that these missiles would be “a cost-imposing strategy on an adversary,” noting that “any enemy that wants to take us on is going to have to commit two, three, four weapons to make sure they take each one out.”

    James Mattis would do well to speak to the men and women who operate America’s land-based ICBM force today. The Cold War is over, and these missiles no longer stand on the frontline of American defense. If the best reasoning for the continued deployment of land-based ICBMs is that they serve as a sump for a potential enemy attack, then there is no real justification for their existence, now or in the future.

    President Trump reportedly told President Putin, during their January 28 conversation, that the current arms control treaty, up for renegotiation in 2018, was one-sided in favor of the Russians. With all due respect to Trump, his American-centric view of the Obama-era arms agreement is moot; the U.S.-Russian arms race is over, and Russia has won.

    The RS-28 missile will be operational next year; the new American land-based ICBM won’t be operational for another decade. Russia is on the verge of deploying a hypersonic, missile silo-killing weapon that undermines the secretary of defense’s thin justification for a new land-based ICBM.

    Every missile system Russia deploys, or will deploy, is capable of defeating America’s missile defense systems, including what is currently deployed and what is envisioned for the future. And Russia is on the verge of completing the deployment of its own anti-missile shield, one that will seal off its air space to bombers, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, negating in totality America’s nuclear triad.

    There is a deal to be made with Russia, and it doesn’t involve trading the lifting of sanctions for nuclear arms cuts. President Trump would do well to accept Sergei Lavrov’s proposed disarmament agenda, and expand it to include a new ABM treaty and a new disarmament treaty that not only reduces the numbers of weapons on both sides, but also would include the elimination of multiple warheads on all missiles, land-based and submarine launched.

    Effective arms control negotiations must include an appreciation of history, a realistic assessment of the present and the ability to project into the future. At this juncture, the Trump administration has not demonstrated the level of competence needed to successfully conclude such a complex negotiation.

    The first step, however, is to embrace disarmament as a positive goal. While President Trump has shown a limited understanding of the nuclear triad, his recognition that nuclear weapons should be “way down and reduced very substantially” is a step in the right direction.
    Former Marine intelligence officer Scott Ritter served on the staff of General Norman Schwarzkopf during the Gulf War and as a U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991 to 1998
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 15th April 2017 at 20:14. Reason: Cleaned up the article and removed unrelated text

  2. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to chancy For This Post:

    Atlas (15th April 2017), Bill Ryan (15th April 2017), DNA (14th April 2017), enigma3 (14th April 2017), Ewan (14th April 2017), Fellow Aspirant (14th April 2017), fourty-two (17th April 2017), justntime2learn (16th April 2017), Nasu (14th April 2017), seko (14th April 2017), TargeT (14th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017), TraineeHuman (14th April 2017)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Australia Avalon Member Spindoctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th October 2014
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Age
    71
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 129 times in 29 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Mr Ritter, like the rest of us, doesnt have the need to know If the US continues to outspend the combined annual total military budgets of russia, china, France, India, the UK and the Saudis even as Trump kicks in billions more, then unless Russia comes up with a totally new breakthrough concept weapon, the US remains the sole military powerhouse over the world if as we are told they've had Ufos since 1947, back engineered under Col. Corso, Tomkins, Ben Rich and others you have either got technology to take ET home or the military industrial complex has a lot of questions to answer where trillions went. If the info presented is anything to go by Merica has remote viewing invincible spies,super soldiers, stargates, ftl space fleets, off world, moon, mars and solar bases, inter dimensional and time technology and ET tech thats millenia ahead of the rest .. the frightening thing is The Don can launch armageddon by himself.

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Spindoctor For This Post:

    Atlas (15th April 2017), JRS (15th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017), TraineeHuman (14th April 2017)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member ghostrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Location
    Sand Springs Ok
    Age
    58
    Posts
    7,427
    Thanks
    9,893
    Thanked 28,794 times in 6,634 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    When you have scalar weapons, weather weapons, beam weapons, sound weapons, mind control, drones, satellites, conventional weapons are irrelevant... Russia can have on the surface the arms title... underneath, America will always be king of death, destruction, war, and mass killing while blaming it on other countries... our propaganda machine is very good, and our people are easily controlled ... remember the machine is 50 years ahead of what we are shown as current technology ... just my thoughts...
    Raiding the Matrix One Mind at a Time ...

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ghostrider For This Post:

    Atlas (15th April 2017), Bubu (16th April 2017), Ernie Nemeth (14th April 2017), Ioneo (14th April 2017), JRS (15th April 2017), Nasu (14th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017), TraineeHuman (15th April 2017)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member zen deik's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th April 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    227
    Thanks
    159
    Thanked 722 times in 196 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    We have awakened a sleeping giant.....
    ONLY THE END OF THE WORLD IS THE END OF THE WORLD AND THIS AIN'T IT

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to zen deik For This Post:

    Atlas (15th April 2017), fourty-two (17th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    44
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,659 times in 8,694 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    this article kind of ignores that we have functional military grade lasers and rail guns... ICBM's can't avoid lasers (yet). And they are operational now, not in 2018.

    Quote Posted by article
    Every missile system Russia deploys, or will deploy, is capable of defeating America’s missile defense systems, including what is currently deployed and what is envisioned for the future. And Russia is on the verge of completing the deployment of its own anti-missile shield, one that will seal off its air space to bombers, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, negating in totality America’s nuclear triad.
    Missiles are so 1980's... we've moved on, that's why our missiles can't match theirs, we found better stuff
    Last edited by TargeT; 14th April 2017 at 19:26.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  10. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Atlas (15th April 2017), Bob (14th April 2017), Bubu (16th April 2017), fourty-two (17th April 2017), JRS (15th April 2017), justntime2learn (15th April 2017), NancyV (14th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017), TraineeHuman (15th April 2017)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Philippines Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th May 2013
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,059
    Thanks
    4,661
    Thanked 13,266 times in 2,725 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    will this destroy any kind of missile no matter how advance it is.

    http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_wendwar.html

    "Tesla inherited from his father a deep hatred of war. Throughout his life, he sought a technological way to end warfare. He thought that war could be converted into, "a mere spectacle of machines."

    In 1931 Tesla announced to reporters at a press conference that he was on the verge of discovering an entirely new source of energy. Asked to explain the nature of the power, he replied, "The idea first came upon me as a tremendous shock... I can only say at this time that it will come from an entirely new and unsuspected source."

    War clouds were again darkening Europe. On 11 July 1934 the headline on the front page of the New York Times read, "TESLA, AT 78, BARES NEW 'DEATH BEAM.'" The article reported that the new invention "will send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 250 miles..." Tesla stated that the death beam would make war impossible by offering every country an "invisible Chinese wall."

    The idea generated considerable interest and controversy. Tesla went immediately to J. P. Morgan, Jr. in search of financing to build a prototype of his invention. Morgan was unconvinced. Tesla also attempted to deal directly with Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of Great Britain. But when Chamberlain resigned upon discovering that he had been out-maneuvered by Hitler at Munich, interest in Tesla's anti-war weapon eventually collapsed.

    By 1937 it was clear that war would soon break out in Europe. Frustrated in his attempts to generate interest and financing for his "peace beam," he sent an elaborate technical paper, including diagrams, to a number of Allied nations including the United States, Canada, England, France, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia. Titled "New Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-Dispersive Energy Through Natural Media," the paper provided the first technical description of what is today called a charged particle beam weapon.
    What set Tesla's proposal apart from the usual run of fantasy "death rays" was a unique vacuum chamber with one end open to the atmosphere. Tesla devised a unique vacuum seal by directing a high-velocity air stream at the tip of his gun to maintain "high vacua." The necessary pumping action would be accomplished with a large Tesla turbine".

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bubu For This Post:

    Atlas (14th April 2017), fourty-two (17th April 2017), Herbert (15th April 2017), TargeT (14th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    44
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,659 times in 8,694 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Quote Posted by Bubu (here)
    will this destroy any kind of missile no matter how advance it is.

    http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_wendwar.html
    if it exists it's being closeted; war, suffering and terror are clearly desired states of being for what ever is feeding off us energetically (the Pedo rings induce suffering and terror also.. some mention of drinking adrenaline saturated blood too?).At least, that's what I have to assume since they are not natural states for humans, we actually work hard to avoid them normally; there for I presume there is some ulterior motive to what seems like sheer stupidity/insanity and why not extra dimensional parasites?

    If the "black space program" is real (and it's very possible) then that type of stuff isn't used possibly because they don't actually wan't to win quickly and efficiently, it's desired that this crap is strung out and squeezed for every last drop of horror possible.. "they" must be greedy bastards.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (16th April 2017), Atlas (15th April 2017), Bubu (16th April 2017), fourty-two (17th April 2017), Ron Mauer Sr (14th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017)

  15. Link to Post #8
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    10th July 2013
    Location
    Project Avalon
    Posts
    3,649
    Thanks
    19,216
    Thanked 16,228 times in 3,216 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Vladimir Putin: America is a bully and threat to stability

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Atlas For This Post:

    Bubu (16th April 2017), Herbert (15th April 2017), Lettherebelight (17th April 2017), toppy (15th April 2017)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Philippines Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th May 2013
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,059
    Thanks
    4,661
    Thanked 13,266 times in 2,725 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    Quote Posted by Bubu (here)
    will this destroy any kind of missile no matter how advance it is.

    http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_wendwar.html
    if it exists it's being closeted; .
    or maybe its pretty much useless against its own kind. So all there is to do is to hit the source, which will be visible once started, just before the missiles hit.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Bubu For This Post:

    Atlas (15th April 2017)

  19. Link to Post #10
    UK Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th December 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 663 times in 165 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    ..........
    Last edited by Honesty; 17th September 2017 at 23:05.

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Honesty For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (16th April 2017), Atlas (15th April 2017), Bill Ryan (15th April 2017), Bubu (16th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (16th April 2017), Lettherebelight (17th April 2017)

  21. Link to Post #11
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    10th July 2013
    Location
    Project Avalon
    Posts
    3,649
    Thanks
    19,216
    Thanked 16,228 times in 3,216 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Removed - off-topic.
    Last edited by Atlas; 16th April 2017 at 16:23.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Atlas For This Post:

    Bubu (16th April 2017)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    76
    Posts
    28,580
    Thanks
    30,501
    Thanked 138,434 times in 21,489 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Quote Posted by iAMWE (here)
    Interesting part starts around the 57 minute mark:
    The documentary Angels and Demons Revealed, narrated by Patrick MacNee, was released on DVD in 2004.

    As I listen now to the portion beginning at the 57 minute mark, I hear it saying that the Illuminati have gained major control over the Russian GRU, who have laid the groundwork for destroying and conquering other major nations, including the US and European nations.

    What's being said, and the way in which it is being said and portrayed with images sound to me very much to be in what Bombard's Body Language would call "portrayal mode" ... someone's selling me something. In this case, that something is "fear of the Russians."

    My personal instincts continue to be that we live in a complex, multi-layered reality, and that at one of those levels, we're being sold fear. Documentaries such as this likely, in my estimation, contain a mix of truth, lies, and propaganda, and they likely leave out other essential information.
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 16th April 2017 at 21:07.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  24. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Alekahn2 (16th April 2017), Bubu (16th April 2017), fourty-two (17th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (16th April 2017), TargeT (16th April 2017)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Philippines Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th May 2013
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,059
    Thanks
    4,661
    Thanked 13,266 times in 2,725 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    Quote Posted by iAMWE (here)
    Interesting part starts around the 57 minute marK:
    The documentary Angels and Demons Revealed, narrated by Patrick MacNee, was released on DVD in 2004.

    As I listen now to the portion beginning at the 57 mark, I hear it saying that the Illuminati have gained major control over the Russian GRU, who have laid the groundwork for destroying and conquering other major nations, including the US and European nations.

    What's being said, and the way in which it is being said and portrayed with images sound to me very much to be in what Bombard's Body Language would call "portrayal mode" ... someone's selling me something. In this case, that something is "fear of the Russians."

    My personal instincts continue to be that we live in a complex, multi-layered reality, and that at one of those levels, we're being sold fear. Documentaries such as this likely, in my estimation, contain a mix of truth, lies, and propaganda, and they likely leave out other essential information.
    well said Paul. Virtually all stories that is pick up and pass on by media serves the purpose of the owners one way or another. so i am always cautious to take the baits and not be hook.

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bubu For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (16th April 2017), ThePythonicCow (16th April 2017)

  27. Link to Post #14
    Mexico Avalon Member seko's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd February 2011
    Location
    tropic of cancer
    Age
    47
    Posts
    939
    Thanks
    36,639
    Thanked 3,868 times in 752 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    this article kind of ignores that we have functional military grade lasers and rail guns... ICBM's can't avoid lasers (yet). And they are operational now, not in 2018.

    Quote Posted by article
    Every missile system Russia deploys, or will deploy, is capable of defeating America’s missile defense systems, including what is currently deployed and what is envisioned for the future. And Russia is on the verge of completing the deployment of its own anti-missile shield, one that will seal off its air space to bombers, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, negating in totality America’s nuclear triad.
    Missiles are so 1980's... we've moved on, that's why our missiles can't match theirs, we found better stuff



    I think this radio interference is even better
    Breathe in the air

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to seko For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (16th April 2017)

  29. Link to Post #15
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    76
    Posts
    28,580
    Thanks
    30,501
    Thanked 138,434 times in 21,489 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    ... someone's selling me something. In this case, that something is "fear of the Russians."

    My personal instincts continue to be that we live in a complex, multi-layered reality, and that at one of those levels, we're being sold fear. Documentaries such as this likely, in my estimation, contain a mix of truth, lies, and propaganda, and they likely leave out other essential information.
    In particular, to be more specific, my hunch is that one of the truths told in this Angels and Demons Revealed documentary is that small atomic bombs are hidden about in key places where they could cause great damage or great loss of life, and are being used to blackmail national governments of the major "Western" nations.

    However I suspect that it was not the Russians who hid these bombs, so much as it was the Anglo-Zionist-Neocon-Jewish-Zionists, as described by The Saker in an article that I recommended in this thread: Important post by The Saker on the Anglo-Zionist-Neocon-Jewish "elephant in the room".

    I further suspect that the devastation at the Fukishima nuclear power plant in Japan was a public demonstration of this capability, and that the government of Israel helped conduct that operation. If so, that would be a crime against humanity suitable for prosecution in the International Court of Justice, if ever anything was. I'm not holding my breath awaiting this outcome, however.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    onawah (16th April 2017), TargeT (17th April 2017)

  31. Link to Post #16
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: The U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Race Is Over and Russia Has Won

    The work of Dutchsinse would be clear evidence of Fukushima being an engineered event.
    He has been tracking HAARP signals on weather maps for a long time, making very accurate predictions about how they show up just before catastrophic weather events.
    And his site and pages on youtube and Facebook have been sabotaged repeatedly, which shows his whistleblowing is upsetting someone a lot.
    See:
    http://uncensored.co.nz/2017/03/05/d...mod-explained/
    Dutchsinse: HAARP, NEXRAD, Weather Mod. Explained
    Mar. 05
    Quote You will never find a better verbal explanation than this. Dutchsinse is a veteran researcher and observer who’s developed an amazing knack for earthquake forecasting.

    For those who may not know, HAARP is up and running after a temporary hiatus, and is just one of a whole worldwide network of ionospheric heating devices that can alter the weather, trigger earthquakes, generate artificial auroras etc,

    But I’ll let Dutchsinse do the talking:
    Last edited by onawah; 16th April 2017 at 21:58.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (16th April 2017), Lettherebelight (17th April 2017)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts