Posted by Sam Hunter
(here)
In
Video 2 around the 48ish minute mark, Bill covers the mind hacking tech possibilities (and references Dr. Robert Duncan's revelations). Bill specifically mentions what I call, "psychic mind influencing techniques" (Bill cites Dr. Duncan's term - "brain entrainment").
Bill points out this quote from Dr. Duncan emphasizing its importance - "The mind has no firewall."
Anyone who listens to this ten or so minute stretch of the interview, if they allow themselves to absorb the implications of what Bill calls "at least a possibility" and where Daniel Liszt then says (at the 56:40) "Well, since we
know they have the technology, and it probably goes even a lot more deeper than that..." and then he throttles back a little and says, "If they have the technology (clearly alluding to the extension of what Dr. Duncan has spoken about to what Bill has speculated about - what I would call informed speculation and even suggest is expert speculation) -
Liszt asks - "Do you think this is what's happening in the case of Goode?"
Bill - "Absolutely I do. [pause], I think it is possible. I think it is likely. I think it could well be a mixture of factors... ego, a desire for status, money, encouragement from David Wilcock..."
"Let's be completely candid about this... I'll say it as simply as I can. Corey's getting paid, he's getting a lot of kudos and attention from this, David is as well, he has his own payoffs from this..."
"So there can be encouragement, there could be compliance, there could be reasons why he's inventing things and there could be, as well... any kind of remote coercion or influence to cause Corey to believe at least some of the things that he's saying as we were saying earlier a whistleblower who believes what they are saying is all the more valuable and credible because of that. And it may be a mixture of all of that and I'm really not able to say... but I think all of those things are in the melting pot for consideration. But it is absolutely not as it appears."
OK - I can very much be open minded to all the possibilities that the above segment of the interview suggests. In fact, I have been.
And so here's where all this can get tricky - can someone like myself then state on this forum (or state anywhere else publicly)? -
In fact I have considered for a long time how this same thing may have gone on with myself.
What then now happens for someone like myself who has pretty compelling rational reasons to consider this may be possible?
Note also, I am bipolar and have dealt with serious addiction issues. It has been years now since I was involved with any substance use and absolute abstinence always seems to ensure I never experience issues related to the bipolar condition....
but still.
And note that when young, I had serious issues regarding honesty and personal integrity. I still struggle with the personal integrity aspect yet nothing like when I was young. When I was young I took risks I would never take today.
There is certainly the hint of narcissism and some megalomania in my personality, again, more so when I was young.
So why am I exposing myself even more blatantly than many of the folks around here already know about me?
Because of this one very important question that I qualify to ask -
What do I (or someone like me) do about it? This, to me, is the question folks need to ask and it doesn't just need to be asked by someone like me who is both 1.) as I described above, but 2.) (and perhaps in large part because of the above) "a vulnerable" to these stories, story tellers, "psuedo researchers" like Wilcock, refined media delivery systems who seem more intent on profits and market share than integrity, band wagon jumper oners like Jimmy Church (and I like him as he is the kind of guy I know I would have a blast hanging out with)...
What can the individual do?
What can someone who may indeed "be targeted" by any forms of this tech (especially the remote psychic mind influencing) do to
not be influenced?
To this last question...
can anything be done?