+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Wildfire pollution much worse than thought, study says

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    5th January 2011
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    2,379
    Thanked 5,466 times in 762 posts

    Default Wildfire pollution much worse than thought, study says

    Wildfire pollution much worse than thought, study says
    Doyle Rice , USA TODAY Published 6:24 p.m. ET June 15, 2017 | Updated 10:32 a.m. ET June 16, 2017

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/weath...ght/102882646/


    Monstrous wildfires not only devastate communities and sometimes kill dozens each year in the U.S., but they also release a toxic brew of hazardous pollution, a new study found.​

    That pollution, often in the form of microscopic specks known as aerosols, is "a hazard to human health, particularly to the lungs and heart," said study lead author Greg Huey from the Georgia Institute of Technology.

    In fact, the study found that fires emit these fine particles — which are much smaller than a grain of sand or a human hair — into the air at a rate three times as high as records kept by the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Then people can inhale them. Some particulate matter contains oxidants that cause genetic damage. The particles can drift over long distances and pollute populated areas, where they're inhaled by people.

    Uncontrolled wildfires burn much more biomass (trees, bushes, and other organic material) per area than do intentionally set prescribed burns, and pollute at a much higher rate, the study found.
    Story from the United States Tour Operators Association
    South Africa offers something for every traveler

    Wildfires also belch out methanol, benzene, ozone precursors and other noxious emissions, scientists said, which sounds like an oil refinery went up in flames. That’s not so far-fetched, Huey said, since oil and other fossil fuels come from similar ancient materials.

    The study was based on airborne research missions during three major wildfires in 2013, including the Rim Fire, the third-largest wildfire in California history. Instruments on board NASA and U.S. Department of Energy aircraft allowed teams of researchers on board to measure chemicals and particles in real time and pull in masses of data.

    “We actually went to measure, right above the fire, what was coming out,” said Huey.

    So far this year, wildfires have already charred over 2.4 million acres across the U.S., the National Interagency Fire Center said. That's about 1 million acres more than usual and the most since 2011.

    The study was published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, a publication of the American Geophysical Union

    FEAR PORN OR JUST INFORMATION THE ANSWER IS IN YOUR HEART NOT YOUR HEAD
    Last edited by ramus; 20th June 2017 at 14:15.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ramus For This Post:

    betoobig (20th June 2017), EFO (20th June 2017), LadyKitt (20th June 2017)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Spain Avalon Member betoobig's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2014
    Location
    Burgos, Spain
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,904
    Thanks
    25,649
    Thanked 11,010 times in 1,798 posts

    Default Re: Wildfire pollution much worse than thought, study says

    "Fires Burn Hotter with Nano Metals in Chemtrails:
    It is common knowledge that nano particulates are increasing the frequency of wild fires, resulting in forest fires that have been burning hotter and spreading faster than ever before in the history of the USA and other regions of the world. The EPA and other such agencies deny that the use of a metals are the cause, but fire fighters and elite e fighter crews will publicly disagree. What is the cause, and could it be that the aerial spraying known as chemtrails is the culprit, let’s examine this subject closer.

    “The dangerous thing about the chemical reactions in fire is the fact that they are self-perpetuating. The heat of the flame itself keeps the fuel at the ignition temperature, so it continues to burn as long as there is fuel and oxygen around it. The flame heats any surrounding fuel so it releases gases as well. When the flame ignites the gases, the fire spreads.”

    Is there such a thing as a fire burning TOO HOT you may ask? Well according to the government website NEWTON DEP , the answer is YES."

    Aluminium is wellknown for hootener any fire, more info in the link. Much love
    http://www.thetruthdenied.com/news/2...in-chemtrails/
    honoring White Feather: SHIFT HAPPENED

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to betoobig For This Post:

    EFO (20th June 2017), LadyKitt (20th June 2017)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts