+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39

Thread: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    INTRODUCTION: The information below exposes an entire series of LEGAL HOAXES by Rod Class and his charlatan partners. Read them all. They are simply unbelievable!

    TABLE OF CONTENTS:

    1). COMMENT 1- "THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX"

    2). COMMENT 2- "THE 14TH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER HOAX"

    3). COMMENT 3- "THE JUDGE DALE HOAX" (reveals Class' charlatan partners) & "THE DEBRA JONES HOAX"

    4). COMMENT 4- "THE COURT SEALED THE COURT FILE BECAUSE MY AMATEUR 'PAPERWORK' WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED EVERY PRIOR CASE IN HISTORY HOAX" (exposes Class' history of psychiatric illness)

    5). COMMENT 5- THE "BOMBSHELL: ROD CLASS HAS OBTAINED HIS 'FOURTH' ADMINISTRATIVE RULING THAT ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE 'PRIVATE ENTITIES' OR 'PRIVATE CONTRACTORS' HOAX" & (the related) "A NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE WARNED ALL STATE POLICE TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES HOAX"

    6). COMMENT 6- THE "LAWYERS HAVE NO AUTHORITY HOAX" & OTHER LAWYER HOAXES (exposes many of Class' amateur legal misconceptions and includes "The B.A.R. Hoax", "The Original 13th Amendment Hoax" & "Title of Nobility Hoax", etc.)

    7). COMMENT 7- "THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 'CERTIFICATE' HOAX" (exposes why Rod Class was in Washington, D.C. in the first place and reveals more about Class' D.C. weapons case never before revealed)

    9). COMMENT 9- "THE SUPREME COURT LOVES MY PAPERWORK HOAX" (exposes the falsity of Class' claims that his attorneys took his case before the Supreme Court because his amateur "paperwork" was so good and reveals more about Class' D.C. weapons case never before revealed)

    10). COMMENT 10- "THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL HOAX" & (the related) "THE NO DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIRED HOAX"

    12). COMMENT 12- "THE UNITED STATES IS A 'CORPORATION' HOAX"

    13). COMMENT 13- "SEVENTH GRADE CIVICS EXPLAINED" (explains what the government really is, how it actually works and where it gets its authority) & (the related) "THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MYTH EXPLAINED" (explains the legal meaning of sovereignty)

    18). COMMENT 18- "THE FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES ARE NOT MONEY HOAX" (exposes many of Class' amateur legal misconceptions and many of his mistakes in the Harold Stanley's IRS case which sent Stanley to prison for 5 to 8 years)

    19). COMMENT 19- "THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX" (exposes a world famous hoax by Rod Class' chief partner in the "Judge 'DALE' Hoax" and several other Rod Class hoaxes)

    22). COMMENT 22- "THE SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX" & "THE REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX" (exposes two more world famous hoaxes by Rod Class' chief partner in the "Judge 'DALE' Hoax" and several other Rod Class hoaxes)

    30). COMMENT 30- "TRACK RECORD OF OTHER AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS" (exposes the actual win-loss, court room track record of all of the other famous amateur legal theorists)

    (COMING SOON: "THE EMBEZZLING FEDERAL FUNDS HOAX", "THE COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM HOAX & "THE FAKE QUOTES FROM CASE LAW HOAX")



    COMMENT 1: "THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX"

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    CLASS PRETENDING TO BE A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL (as he mistakenly defines it):
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22P...Rod+Class%22&*

    FAKE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL VEHICLES:
    http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/d...actant.159266/ (SCROLL DOWN TO THE 2ND AND 3RD PHOTOS.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=8s (At :05-:45).

    FAKE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL "COSTUME":
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...ower_right.jpg
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jWito8KuFI&t=163s (at 10:15).

    FAKE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL COURT FILINGS:
    https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._18TH_2013.pdf (AT FIRST SEVERAL PARAGRAPHS)
    https://www.scribd.com/document/5219...e-to-AG-Office (AT PARAGRAPHS ACTUALLY NUMBERED "10" and "11" AT ABOUT 30% THROUGH THE TEXT)

    FALSE ALLEGATIONS THAT ROD CLASS IS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL:
    https://newearth.media/private-attor...s-on-the-itnj/ (IN THE TITLE AND IN THE 1ST FULL PARAGRAPH)
    https://alternativeaction.wordpress....r-to-the-navy/ (AT THE 3RD FULL PARAGRAPH)
    http://mistymountain.info/feed/link-...ivate-attorney (IN THE 2ND AND 3RD FULL PARAGRAPHS)
    https://itnjcommittee.org/wp-content...C-Gun-Case.pdf (ON PAGE 2 BEGINNING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE 2ND FULL PARAGRAPH)

    THE HOAX: Rod Class falsely claims to be a "Private Attorney General" and that, as such, he is EXTREMELY powerful, EXTREMELY important and that he represents an EXTREME threat to government agencies and officials in that imaginary capacity. But, none of this is so.

    BACKGROUND: The terms “Attorney General”, “Attorney", “Judge” and “Prosecutor” are all "PROFESSIONAL TITLES" and "POSITIONS" for highly-educated, legal experts in powerful positions. Class wanted other people to think of him as such a person. So, he created for himself an appropriate TITLE, POSITION, EMBLEM, COSTUME, VEHICLE and some imaginary POWERS to help him in this regard. For his title and position, Class picked the term, "Private Attorney General". This is because the term, "Private Attorney General", actually appears in the federal CASE LAW (not in the federal STATUES) and because it would help him create the prestigious IMAGE he wanted. But, Class should have researched this term first. He had absolutely NO IDEA what this term actually meant.

    HOAX CONTINUED: Class falsely claims: 1). That the term, "Private Attorney General", is a "PROFESSIONAL TITLE" and "POSITION" (like "Attorney General", "Attorney", "Judge" or "Prosecutor" are) for a non-attorney who is somehow authorized to practice law without a license; 2). That the purpose of the Private Attorney General is to “DO ACCOUNTABILITY” (sic) against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and their appointees for doing their jobs; 3). That his "AUTHORITY" as a Private Attorney General comes from "CONGRESS" (by which he means two FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS statutes and a FORGED Private Attorney General "CERTIFICATE" which he FABRICATED AND ISSUED TO HIMSELF); and 4). That he has the power to "ARREST rogue judges" and other governmental officials. http://mistymountain.info/feed/link-...ivate-attorney (end of 2nd paragraph);
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/913. But, none of Class' claims in this regard are true.

    THE TRUTH:
    1). SUMMARY: Class is not now and has never been a Private Attorney General. Indeed, he doesn't even know the meaning of the term. As used in connection with the two FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS statutes upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General (and throughout this comment), the term "Private Attorney General" is a TEMPORARY, courtroom NICKNAME used by the FEDERAL courts when referring to a FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY who has already WON such client's FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS case in FEDERAL court. But, Class does not know this.

    2). NOT A "PROFESSIONAL TITLE" OR "POSITION": The TEMPORARY, courtroom NICKNAME, "Private Attorney General", is NOT a "professional title" or "position" (like "Attorney General", "Attorney", "Judge" or "Prosecutor" are), much less a "professional title" or "position" for a FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed, self-appointed "attorney" (or "attorney general") who is somehow authorized to practice law without a license. But, Class does not know this.

    3). NO CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY: Class has NO authority from "Congress" to practice law (or to otherwise represent another person in court). Unknown to Class, Congress has NO POWER to authorize any person (including Class) to practice law. This is because Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution LISTS "ALL" OF THE POWERS OF CONGRESS. http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/pa...le-i-section-8. Note that the power for Congress to authorize a person to practice law IS NOT ON THIS TINY LIST of Congressional powers. Under the tenth amendment, ONLY THE STATES have the power to authorize a person to practice law. http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment . But, Class does not know any of this. (Class' FORGED, SELF-ISSUED, Private Attorney General "CERTIFICATE" upon which he relies is fully explained in the SEVENTH (7th) comment below.).

    4). MISUNDERSTOOD PURPOSE: The purpose of a Private Attorney General is NOT to "DO ACCOUNTABILITY" (sic) against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" or their appointees for doing their jobs.

    5). ACTUAL PURPOSE: As used in connection with the two FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS statutes upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General, THE TERM "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" RELATES SOLELY TO PROVIDING PAYMENT TO ATTORNEYS WHO WIN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VICTIMS (for "Private Attorneys General"). Indeed, the official, legal name of Title 42 U.S.C. 1988(b) (upon which class relies) is the "CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY'S FEES AWARDS ACT". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_...rd_Act_of_1976. (This official, legal name ALONE should have given Class some clue about the real purpose of a "Private Attorney General", but it did not.). Under the "concept" of a Private Attorney General, a CIVIL RIGHTS VICTIM who has no money, but who has a meritorious CIVIL RIGHTS case, is still able to hire an attorney to represent him/her in the CIVIL RIGHTS case anyway, because the attorney will be paid by the other side if he/she WINS the case. This encourages CIVIL RIGHTS VICTIMS with meritorious CIVIL RIGHTS cases to hire attorneys and to file (and WIN) such cases. But, Class does not know any of this.

    6). DEFINITION: As used in connection with the two federal, civil rights statutes upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General, a Private Attorney General is the ACTUAL "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY who has already WON such client's federal, civil rights case in federal court. Such a Private Attorney General is the ACTUAL VICTIM of the federal, civil rights violation and is also the ACTUAL PLAINTIFF in the federal, civil rights case in federal court. A potential "Private Attorney General" IS A PERSON WHO IS COMPLETELY POWERLESS WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY. This is why Congress passed the subject statutes in the first place (to provide such COMPLETELY POWERLESS PERSONS with attorneys WHO REALLY DO HAVE SPECIAL POWERS, SPECIAL AUTHORITY, SPECIAL IMPORTANCE, SPECIAL ABILITiES AND SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS & PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1964" (twice);"RACIAL discrimination" (four separate times!); "NEGROES were discriminated against"; "a reasonable ATTORNEY'S FEE"; "COUNSEL FEES"; "When a PLAINTIFF [read this term again]... obtains an injunction [WINS a court order prohibiting the defendant from committing further CIVIL RIGHTS violations], he [the PLAINTIFF] does so... AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL [Translation: THE WINNING, CIVIL RIGHTS "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!], vindicating a ["CIVIL RIGHTS"] policy that Congress considered [to be] of the highest priority [AS EVIDENCED BY CONGRESS PASSING "THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964"]. If successful [WINNING] PLAINTIFFS [If "PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL"] were... forced to bear [forced to pay] their own ATTORNEY'S FEES [Translation: Private Attorneys General ARE "CLIENTS" REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEYS, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY'S FEES" to pay], few aggrieved parties [few CIVIL RIGHTS VICTIMS] would be in a position to... [fight back using the] powers of the FEDERAL COURTS." (The immediately preceding text begins in the 3rd full paragraph at about 60% through the text of the case.); "It follows that one [a PLAINTIFF] who succeeds [WINS] in obtaining an injunction [thereby becoming a "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL"] under that title [meaning "THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1964"] should ordinarily recover an ATTORNEY'S FEE [from the violator] [Translation: A Private Attorney General IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY'S FESS" to pay]." (The immediately preceding text is in the 4th full paragraph at about 80% through the text of the case.).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "RACIALLY discriminatory reasons"; "black and Hispanic"; "black or Hispanic"; "black children"; "black women"; "black family"; "construction workers were black"; "race"; "[W]ith reference to the specific statutes here relied upon [the statutes upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General], CIVIL RIGHTS PLAINTIFFS [read that term again] act not only in their own interests but also... AS PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL [Translation: the CIVIL RIGHTS "PLAINTIFFS" ARE THE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL!]"; "The characterization of the PLAINTIFF [read this term again] AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL [Translation: THE "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!]... first appeared in Newman [the case directly above]... ." (The preceding text is in the 18th full paragraph at about 65% through the text of the case.).; "CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1964"; "When a PLAINTIFF [read this term again]... obtains an injunction [WINS], he [the PLAINTIFF] does so... AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL... [Translation: THE WINNING, CIVIL RIGHTS "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!]." (The immediately preceding text is in the block indented portion of the 18th full paragraph at about 68% through the text of the case.); "a PLAINTIFF'S [read this term again] role AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL... [Translation: THE "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!]... ." (The immediately preceding text is in the 19th full paragraph of the case at about 70% through the text of the case.).

    7). What a REAL Private Attorney General actually looks like.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22c...&bih=613#spf=1.

    8). What a FAKE Private Attorney General actually looks like.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22P...Rod+Class%22&* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

    9). SOURCE OF THE TERM: The term, "Private Attorney General", does not appear a single FEDERAL statute or rule, much less in the FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS statutes upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General. Instead, the term, "Private Attorney General", is a TEMPORARY, courtroom NICKNAME that was created in jest by (and is still used by) the FEDERAL courts. But, Class does not know this.

    10). WHAT THE SUBJECT STATUTES ACTUALLY DO: The two federal, civil rights statutes upon which Class relies (and the statutes to which they refer) ONLY DO TWO THINGS (when combined): a). They permit the actual VICTIM (and ONLY the actual VICTIM) of the federal, CIVIL RIGHTS violation (and ONLY a federal, CIVIL RIGHTS violation) TO SUE the violator in FEDERAL court (and ONLY in FEDERAL court); and b). They permit the FEDERAL judge TO AWARD ATTORNEYS FEES to the winning side's attorney. THAT IS ALL THEY DO.
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/lega...ral%20doctrine;
    http://dictionary.findlaw.com/defini...-doctrine.html;
    https://law.academic.ru/67823/privat...neral_doctrine:
    https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/pr...eral-doctrine/.
    There is NOTHING in either of these two federal, civil rights statutes (or the statutes to which they refer) that authorizes a non-attorney (like Rod Class) to practice law, to represent another person in court or to use the TEMPORARY, courtroom NICKNAME, "Private Attorney General", AS IF it were a "professional title" or "position".
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1988 (See section (b));
    https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUT...E-78-Pg241.pdf (See Section 204(b) at about 20% through the text of the statute).

    The very fact that Congress even passed these two federal, civil rights statues (both of which effectively provide civil rights victims with attorneys) reflects that CONGRESS ITSELF recognized that potential "PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL" ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE COMPLETELY POWERLESS WITHOUT ATTORNEYS. If Private Attorneys General really had the powers that Class claims they have, then there would have been no need to for Congress TO HAVE "REMEDIED" THEIR POWERLESSNESS by passing SPECIAL LEGISLATION which effectively provides such POWERLESS PERSONS with attorneys, WHO REALLY DO HAVE SPECIAL POWERS, SPECIAL AUTHORITY, SPECIAL IMPORTANCE, SPECIAL ABILITIES and SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE.

    11). NO SPECIAL POWERS: A Private Attorney General has NO POWERS, NO AUTHORITY, NO IMPORTANCE, NO ABILITIES and NO KNOWLEDGE that any other person in the entire world does not already have. None. Under the two federal, CIVIL RIGHTS statutes upon which Class relies (and the statutes to which they refer), THE ONLY ABILITIES OF A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ARE TO "HIRE AN ATTORNEY" (becoming a "client") AND TO "FILE A FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUIT" (as a "plaintiff") IN FEDERAL COURT (and ONLY in "federal court"). Note that BOTH OF THESE ABILITIES (to hire an attorney and to file a lawsuit) ARE ABILITIES THAT EVERY PERSON IN THE ENTIRE WORLD "ALREADY HAS"! So, there is NOTHING DIFFERENT, UNIQUE or SPECIAL about the abilities of a Private Attorney General WHEN COMPARED TO ANY OTHER PERSON ON PLANET EARTH. NOTHING. So, becoming a Private Attorney General CHANGES NOTHING ABOUT THE POWERS OR ABILITIES OF A PERSON. NOTHING. But, Class does not know this.

    12). LIMITATIONS ON A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" UNDER THE STATUTES UPON WHICH CLASS RELIES: Class mistakenly believes that the: (a). "FEDERAL" (b). "CIVIL RIGHTS" statutes upon which he relies make him a Private Attorney General (as he mistakenly defines it) in "EVERY" type of CASE in the world (ex: criminal, tax, traffic, bankruptcy, foreclosure, etc.) in "EVERY" type of COURT in the world (ex: "STATE" administrative court, "STATE" judicial court, FEDERAL administrative court, FEDERAL tax court, etc.) in "EVERY" state and nation "EVERYWHERE" in the world. But, this is not so. The statutes upon which Class relies are: (a). "FEDERAL" (b). "CIVIL RIGHTS" statutes. That means they "ONLY" apply in: (a) "FEDERAL" (b). "CIVIL RIGHTS" cases and (c). "ONLY" in "FEDERAL" court. (STATE courts have no jurisdiction to preside over FEDERAL, civil rights cases brought under the federal, civil rights statutes upon which Class relies.). But, Class does not know enough to even realize this. It never occurred to Class that the ONLY reason that the: (a). "FEDERAL" (b). "CIVIL RIGHTS" statutes upon which he relies ARE WRITTEN INTO (a) "FEDERAL" (b) "CIVIL RIGHTS" legislation (and NOT into "OTHER" "FEDERAL" or "STATE" legislation) is that they "ONLY" apply in (a). "FEDERAL" (b). "CIVIL RIGHTS" CASES (not in other kinds of cases) and "ONLY" apply in (c) "FEDERAL" court (not in any kind of STATE court). So, under the statutes upon which Class relies, it is legally IMPOSSIBLE for any person (including Class) to be Private Attorney General UNLESS they are the actual "CIVIL RIGHTS" "VICTIM" and the actual "CIVIL RIGHTS" "PLAINTIFF" and the actual "CIVIL RIGHTS" "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY who has ALREADY WON such client's "FEDERAL", "CIVIL RIGHTS" case, which case is STILL PENDING in "FEDERAL" court (for the award of attorney fees). This is why NO COURT HAS EVER RECOGNIZED CLASS AS A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" and why NO COURT HAS EVER ALLOWED CLASS TO ACT AS A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" (as he mistakenly defines it or otherwise). Note: Class makes this same AMATEUR mistake with respect to hundreds of other statutes (mistakenly believing that a definition or rule in one FEDERAL or STATE statute applies to UNRELATED statutes, to UNRELATED types of cases, in UNRELATED types of courts, in UNRELATED jurisdictions, in UNRELATED states, in UNRELATED nations, to or from UNRELATED periods in history, etc.).

    13). DOES NOT APPLY TO CRIMINAL CASES OR TO DEFENDANTS: Unknown to Class, there no such thing as a Private Attorney General in ANY TYPE OF "CRIMINAL" CASE anywhere (a person can only be a Private Attorney General in a "CIVIL" case). Unknown to Class, there is no such thing as a Private Attorney General who is ANY TYPE OF "DEFENDANT" anywhere (only a "PLAINTIFF" can be a Private Attorney General). This means that Class has never been, and can never be a Private Attorney General in connection with his D.C. weapons case (a "CRIMINAL" case in which he is the "DEFENDANT").

    14). COMPARISON TO AN ATTORNEY: An attorney IS an attorney IN EVERY sense of the word. But, a Private Attorney General IS NOT an attorney IN ANY sense of the word! An attorney represents a party in court. But, a Private Attorney General IS A PARTY IN COURT! An attorney represents a client in court. But, a Private Attorney General IS A CLIENT IN COURT! An attorney acts on behalf of people WHO ARE IN COURT. But, a Private Attorney General acts ONLY on his/her OWN BEHALF and ONLY on behalf of people WHO ARE "OUT" OF COURT! A person’s status as an attorney CONTINUES AFTER THE END OF THE CASE. But, a person’s status as a Private Attorney General ENDS (FOREVER) AT THE END OF THE CASE! But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    15). ORIGIN OF TERM: A REAL United States "Attorney General" WINS federal, civil rights lawsuits which benefits society as a whole. Likewise, an ordinary "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY who WINS federal, civil rights lawsuits also benefits society as a whole. Noting the similarity IN FUNCTION between such litigants, FEDERAL courts began jokingly referring to such winning, civil rights "CLIENTS" OF ATTORNEYS as "Private Attorneys General". The FEDERAL courts still use this term to remind the parties that a such a winning, civil rights "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY (a Private Attorney General) has rendered a public service and is, therefore, statutorily eligible for an award of attorney fees from the other side to pay his/her attorney who actually WON the "CLIENT'S" civil rights case in federal court.

    16). EFFECT: Thus, in creating and using the TEMPORARY, courtroom NICKNAME, “Private Attorney General”, the federal courts: a). Were NOT somehow elevating non-attorneys (like Rod Class) to the professional level (or "position") of REAL attorneys (or REAL attorneys general); b). Were NOT somehow recognizing a "special class" of FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed, self-appointed "attorneys" (or "attorneys general") who were somehow authorized to practice law without a license; and c). Were NOT somehow creating a "professional title" for non-attorneys (like Rod Class) to use in defrauding the public.

    17). CONCLUSION: Rod Class is not now and has never been a Private Attorney General. Indeed, he doesn’t even know the meaning of the term. But, consider this. Even if Rod Class was a Private Attorney General (and he is not), HE WOULD STILL HAVE NO POWERS, NO AUTHORITY, NO IMPORTANCE AND NO ABILITIES THAT EVERY OTHER PERSON IN THE ENTIRE WORLD DOES NOT ALREADY HAVE (the power to hire an attorney and to file a lawsuit). There is nothing different, unique or special about the powers, authority, importance or abilities of a Private Attorney General WHEN COMPARED TO ANY OTHER PERSON IN THE ENTIRE WORLD. But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    THE LAW:
    Note in the cases below that the SOLE PURPOSE of the Private Attorney General Doctrine under the two federal, civil rights statutes upon which Class relies is to PROVIDE PAYMENT to ATTORNEYS who WIN cases for FEDERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS VICTIMS/CLIENTS. Also note that the ONLY ABILITIES of the Private Attorney General in the cases below (and every other case brought under the statutes upon which Class relies) are the abilities to HIRE an attorney and to FILE a federal, civil rights lawsuit in federal court, ABILITIES THAT EVERY PERSON IN THE WORLD ALREADY HAS. So, becoming a Private Attorney General CHANGES NOTHING ABOUT THE POWERS OR ABILITIES OF A PERSON. NOTHING.

    1). PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEFINED (continued from paragraph 6 above):

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "reasonable ATTORNEY'S FEE"; "FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS"; "ATTORNEY FEES"; "The statute involved here, 42 U.S.C. 1988 [the statute upon which Class relies in pretending to be a private attorney general], allows for the award of 'a reasonable ATTORNEY'S FEE' to 'prevailing party' [the WINNER] in various types of CIVIL RIGHTS cases [Translation: The "prevailing party" IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY'S FEES" to pay]... ." (The immediately preceding text is at the 11th full paragraph at about 40% through the text of the case.); "When a PLAINTIFF [read that term again] succeeds in remedying a CIVIL RIGHTS violation [WINS THE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE], ...he [the PLAINTIFF] serves AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL [Translation: THE WINNING, CIVIL RIGHTS "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!]. He [the WINNING PLAINTIFF/PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL] therefore 'should ordinarily recover an ATTORNEY'S FEE from the defendant [Translation: A Private Attorney General IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY'S FEES" to pay]... .'" (The immediately preceding text is in the 11th full paragraph at about 40% through the text of the case.). Note that the ONLY ABILITIES of the Private Attorney General in this case (and every other case brought under the statutes upon which Class relies) are the abilities to HIRE an attorney and to FILE a federal, civil rights lawsuit in federal court, ABILITIES THAT EVERY PERSON IN THE WORLD ALREADY HAS.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "ATTORNEY'S FEES" (over a dozen times); "reasonable FEE"; "CIVIL RIGHTS PLAINTIFF" (4 times). "CIVIL RIGHTS remedy"; "CIVIL RIGHTS violations" (twice); "...[In 1976,] Congress enacted the CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY'S FEES AWARDS ACT of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 1988 [the statute upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General], which authorized the [FEDERAL] district courts to award reasonable ATTORNEY'S FEES to prevailing parties [THE WINNERS] in specified CIVIL RIGHTS cases [Translation: The "prevailing party' IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY FEES" to pay]." (The immediately preceding text is in the 8th full paragraph, not including block indented quoted portions, at about 15% through the text of the case); "A PLAINTIFF [read that term again] who obtains relief [WINS] in a CIVIL RIGHTS lawsuit 'does so... AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL... [Translation: THE WINNING, CIVIL RIGHTS "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!].'" (The immediately preceding text is at about 30% through the text of the case.).; "CIVIL RIGHTS litigation"; "CIVIL RIGHTS CASES"; "VICTIMS of illegal discrimination"; "CIVIL RIGHTS laws"; "CIVIL RIGHTS claims" (twice); "CIVIL RIGHTS defendant"; "CIVIL RIGHTS attorneys". Note that the ONLY ABILITIES of the Private Attorney General in this case (and every other case brought under the statutes upon which Class relies) are the abilities to HIRE an attorney and to FILE a federal, civil rights lawsuit in federal court, ABILITIES THAT EVERY PERSON IN THE WORLD ALREADY HAS.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "ATTORNEY'S FEE" (over a dozen times); "Both FEE AWARD provisions [referring to Title 42 U.S.C. 1988, upon which Class relies, and another statute] are intended to reward the SUCCESSFUL [WINNING] PLAINTIFF [read that term again] ACTING AS 'A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL'... [Translation: THE WINNING "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and the Private Attorney General IS A CLIENT OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no FEES to pay!]." (The immediately preceding text is in the 11th full paragraph at about 20% through the text of the case.). Note that the ONLY ABILITIES of the Private Attorney General in this case (and every other case brought under the statutes upon which Class relies) are the abilities to HIRE an attorney and to FILE a federal, civil rights lawsuit in federal court, ABILITIES THAT EVERY PERSON IN THE WORLD ALREADY HAS.

    2). EVERY COURT THAT HAS EVER ADDRESSED THE SUBJECT HAS HELD THAT ROD CLASS IS NOT A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THAT HE MAY NOT REPRESENT ANOTHER PERSON IN COURT (a fact that Class deliberately HIDES from all of his followers.).:

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "The Debtors [Class' pretend "clients"] asked this court to allow Mr. Rodney Dale Class to appear as a 'Private Attorney General' [the court places quotation marks around this term to make fun of it]... . [But] this court determined that Mr. [Rodney DALE] Class was not an attorney admitted to practice law in this court or in the highest court of any state... . Therefore, this court DENIED the Debtor's [Class' pretend "clients"] request for... [legal] representation by Mr. [Rodney DALE] Class. (The preceding text is in the 31st full paragraph at about 30% through the text of the case.).; "The statute involved here [the statute upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General], 42 U.S.C. 1988, allows the award of a 'reasonable attorney's fee' to the 'prevailing party' [the WINNER] in various kinds of CIVIL RIGHTS cases [Translation: The "prevailing party" IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY'S FEES" to pay]. When a PLAINTIFF [read that term again] succeeds in remedying a CIVIL RIGHTS violation [WINS a CIVIL RIGHTS case], ... he [the PLAINTIFF] serves AS A 'PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL' ... [Translation: THE WINNING, CIVIL RIGHTS "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!"]. He [the PLAINTIFF/PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL] therefore, should ordinarily recover an ATTORNEY'S FEE from the defendant [Translation: The Private Attorney General IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY'S FEES" to pay]... . IT IS CLEAR [read this phrase again] THAT THE CONCEPT [the purpose] OF A 'PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL' IS TO ALLOW FOR THE RECOVERY OF REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES BY A SUCCESSFUL [WINNING] PLAINTIFF [called a "Private Attorney General"] [Translation: a). The Private Attorney General IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no ATTORNEY'S FEES to pay. Translation: b). A Private Attorney General IS NOT A "PROFESSIONAL TITLE" or "POSITION" (like "Judge", "Prosecutor", "Attorney General" and "Attorney" are) for Rod Class or anyone else.]... . THIS DOCTRINE [The "Private Attorney General Doctrine"] DOES NOT PERMIT A PERSON [who is] NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE LAW [referring to Rod Class] TO REPRESENT A PARTY AS AN ATTORNEY IN A COURT PROCEEDING." (The immediately preceding text is in FOOTNOTE 8 of this case at about 90% through the text of this case.).

    ANALYSIS: The preceding text is, by far, the best and most comprehensive, scholarly analysis of the "Private Attorney General" as it relates to amateur legal theory in the entire body of the law.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. (Note that this case is the appeal of Class' LOSS in the case immediately above.). LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "In its... order, the bankruptcy court [referring to the court in the case directly above] began its analysis... by addressing the Debtor's [Class' pretend "clients"] oral request...to have [Rodney DALE] Class appear as a 'Private Attorney General' [the court places quotation marks around this term to make fun of it]. Because [Rodney DALE] Class admitted that he was not licensed to practice law in any court in the country, the bankruptcy court DENIED the debtor's 'Private Attorney General' [the court again places quotation marks around this term to make fun of it] request. As recognized by the bankruptcy court [referring to the court in the case directly above] in its... order, 42 U.S.C. 1988 [the statute upon which Class relies in pretending to be a Private Attorney General] allows the award of a 'reasonable ATTORNEY'S FEE' to 'the prevailing party' [the WINNER] in various kinds of CIVIL RIGHTS cases [Translation: The "prevailing party" IS A "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY, otherwise, there would be no "ATTORNEY FEES" to pay]... . When a PLAINTIFF [read that term again] SUCCEEDS in remedying a CIVIL RIGHTS violation [WINS the CIVIL RIGHTS case], ...he [the PLAINTIFF] serves 'AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL'... [Translation: THE WINNING CIVIL RIGHTS "PLAINTIFF" IS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!]. IN NO WAY DOES THE CONCEPT OF A 'PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL' PERMIT AN INDIVIDUAL [WHO IS] NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW [referring to Rod Class] TO REPRESENT A PARTY IN A COURT PROCEEDING. An unlicensed individual [referring to Rod Class] WHO ATTEMPTS to appear in a representative capacity for a party in a court COMMITS THE UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW which is strictly prohibited [just ask Anthony Williams]." (The preceding text is in the 45th full paragraph at about 50% through the text of the case.).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. (Note that this case is effectively an "appeal" of Class' TWO LOSSES above.). LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "[A]s a lay person, he [referring to Rod Class] cannot prosecute a claim on behalf of the Pertusets [Class' pretend "clients"] or any other individuals... . [A] lay person [referring directly to Rod Class] cannot appear as counsel for others [just ask Anthony Williams]... ." (The preceding text is in the 2nd full paragraph at about 100% through the text of this case.).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. (Note that this is Class' Washington, D.C. weapons case.). LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "In his motion, Defendant [referring to Rod Class] CLAIMS he has been given authority by the house and senate to act as a private attorney general [Class is referring to his SELF-ISSUED, FORGED Private Attorney General "CERTIFICATE" which is fully explained in the 7th COMMENT below]. [BUT,] THERE IS NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THIS ALLEGATION [Translation: Rod Class is NOT a Private Attorney General.]" (The preceding text is in RULING "35" at about 95% through the text of the case.).

    Note: Several more Rod Class LOSSES with identical rulings (THAT CLASS IS NOT A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THAT HE MAY NOT REPRESENT ANOTHER PERSON IN COURT) are available on Pacer.gov. which will not allow us to link to its cases. Otherwise, we would have shown you MANY MORE of these Rod Class LOSSES to this same effect.

    3). OTHER FAKE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL:

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 . LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "The court first addresses [amateur legal theorist] Carver's litigation efforts on... [the Plaintiff's] behalf. Carver is NOT a lawyer, and MAY NOT ASSERT A CLAIM ON BEHALF OF ANYONE ELSE... . CARVER'S SELF-DESCRIPTION [read this term again] AS A 'PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL' [the court places this term in quotes to make fun of it] DOES NOT ALTER THIS ANALYSIS. 'In NO WAY does the concept of a private attorney general permit an individual [who is] NOT licensed to practice law to represent a party in a court proceeding. An unlicensed individual who attempts to appear in a representative capacity for a party in court [like Rod Class does] commits the UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW which is strictly prohibited [just ask Anthony Williams]." (The preceding text is in the 4th full paragraph of this case at about 30% through the text of this case.). The court in this case actually cites (and quotes) Rod Class' LOSS in the Pertuset LOSS above (the bankruptcy case) as legal authority for this decision.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "The complaint in this matter... . [along with another filing] was signed by [amateur legal theorist] Anthony Williams, who, while purporting [means "pretending"] to be a PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, is NOT a member of the bar such that he can represent others before this court.... . Williams MAY NOT REPRESENT the Malanays [Williams' pretend "clients"] as their attorney in this matter." (The preceding text is in the 1st and 2nd full paragraphs at about 15% through the text of this case.). "Although a non-attorney [referring to Williams] may appear [on] his own behalf[,]... [h]e has NO AUTHORITY TO APPEAR AS AN ATTORNEY FOR OTHERS... ." (The immediately preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph at about 30% through the text of this case.). "Hawaii [like every other state] has a statute PROHIBITING THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW... . Williams may NOT use a POWER OF ATTORNEY [in an futile effort] to skirt this prohibition... . [Hawaii, like ALL OTHER STATES, have] recognized that THESE STATUTES WERE ENACTED TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM AGAINST [amateur] INCOMPETENCE... . [and] Williams's (sic) pleadings CERTAINLY DO NOT DEMONSTRATE COMPETENCE... . [citing several examples of his INCOMPETENCE, all of which are the very same amateur legal theories that Rod Class peddles]." (The immediately preceding text is in the 6th and 7th full paragraphs at about 70% through the text of this case.). NOTE THAT "ANTHONY WILLIAMS" IN THIS CASE IS THE SAME "ANTHONY WILLIAMS" WHO STARS IN THE VIDEO BELOW.

    PAY FOR A ROD CLASS SEMINAR? GET THREE TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK!
    https://bbsradio.com/cgi-bin/webbbs/...d=read;id=7219
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...ower_right.jpg;
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...eHsTCpkma?dl=0

    If you PAID to attend ANY SEMINAR involving Rod Class' IN RELIANCE of his fraudulent claims that: 1). He is a "Private Attorney General"; OR THAT 2). He can "TRAIN" you to be a "Private Attorney General"; OR THAT 3). He knows the law; OR THAT 4). He (rather than an attorney) has EVER "won" ANY case, in ANY court, at ANY time, THEN YOU MAY RECOVER THREE (3) TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK, PLUS ATTORNEY FEES, PLUS OTHER LEGAL COSTS UNDER FEDERAL RICO!

    NOTE: Rod Class markets and solicits money for his seminars by using the "means" of "INTERSTATE commerce" (internet, email, telephone, U.S. Mail, etc.). Rod Class markets and solicits money for his seminars by making the fraudulent representations described above. This fraudulent conduct gives rise to FEDERAL jurisdiction, to claims under FEDERAL RICO and also gives rise to STATE law claims for fraud and misrepresentation.

    THE LAW ON SEMINARS UNDER FEDERAL RICO:

    1). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "[THE DEFENDANT HERE] PREYED ON... AMERICANS WITH LITTLE EXPERIENCE IN THE TAX LAWS OR THE LEGAL SYSTEM [exactly like Rod Class does]. AT HIS SEMINARS, ...[the Defendant here] PROMISED those in attendance... that they could lawfully reduce their income tax liability to zero [just like Rod Class promises his own SEMINAR customers]... . [The Defendant also promised those in attendance that he] would PROVIDE... [them with LEGAL DOCUMENT] PREPARATION AND ADVICE... [and] LEGAL PROTECTION...[just like Rod Class promises his own SEMINAR customers]." (The preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph at about 10% through the text of the case.); "[The Defendant here described his METHODS and his DOCUMENTS as] 'TRIED AND TRUE' [just like Rod Class describes his own METHODS and his own DOCUMENTS to his own SEMINAR customers]"; "Despite... [the Defendant here's] promise that 'nobody ever lost a dime' under... [his] scheme... , [THE DEFENDANT HERE'S] CLIENTS INCURR[ED] SEVERE IRS PENALTIES FOR LATE PAYMENTS AND OVERSTATED DEDUCTIONS" [just like Rod Class' own SEMINAR customers and "clients" incur, such as Harold Stanley, who went to prison for 5 to 8 years]." (The immediately preceding text is in the 6th full paragraph at about 20% through the text of the case.). Translation: The Defendant here, like Rod Class, LIED to his customers about the BENEFITS that his SEMINAR customers would receive from attending his SEMINARS, such as becoming a "Private Attorney General" and "WINNING cases in court", etc. ; "...[T]he jury [here] found...[the Defendant here] LIABLE FOR VIOLATING [FEDERAL RICO] section 1962(d), AWARDING [the Plaintiffs] $259,366 in actual damages trebled [means "TRIPLED"] to $778,098 under [FEDERAL RICO] 18 U.S.C. 1964(c)). It [the jury] also awarded... [the Plaintiffs] $87,000 in damages for FRAUD and MISREPRESENTATION [under state law]. Finally, the jury awarded the... [the Plaintiff's] $500,000 in PUNITIVE DAMAGES under...[state law]." (The immediately preceding text is in the 8th full paragraph at about 25% through the text of the case.). Thus, under the law, Rod Class is liable to his SEMINAR customers for TRIPLE their losses under FEDERAL RICO and liable to his customers for ACTUAL and PUNITIVE DAMAGES under STATE law.

    2). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "Defendant [here]... offer[ed] SEMINARS... purporting [means "pretending"] to teach Defendant's 'master strategies' for... SUCCESS [just like Rod Class promises his own SEMINAR customers]." (The preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph at about 10% through the text of the case.); "Learn from the MASTER [just like Rod Class effectively describes himself to his own SEMINAR customers]". For the law on how FEDERAL RICO law applies to Rod Class under these facts, read the entire "DISCUSSION" section of the case at the 16th and 17th full paragraphs, not including block indented paragraphs for quoted portions, at about 40% through the text of the case.

    3). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "[T]he... defendants [here] held themselves out as [being] capable of 'repairing' broken credit... . The... defendants [here] gave public SEMINARS... in Texas. Arkansas, Mississippi and Tennessee... ." (The preceding text is in the 16th full paragraph, immediately below the section entitled "B. Credit Repair Program", at about 25% through the text of the case.).; "[The defendants here] represented [to their customers] that, BY FOLLOWING... [their own methods which they taught their customers], they had [SUCCESSFULLY] improved their [own] credit scores... . [and] that they had received many personal benefits from the... program [which they taught their customers]... [similar to what Rod Class represents to his SEMINAR customers]." (The immediately preceding text is in the 17th paragraph at about 27% through the text of the case.).; "On the basis of these MISREPRESENTATIONS,... . [the defendants' customers] paid [the] defendants $1,698 in... fees [just like Rod Class' own SEMINAR customers pay him based on similar MISREPRESENTATIONS]... ." (The immediately preceding text is in the 18th full paragraph at about 30% through the text of the case.).; "[But] no credit score improvement... occurred... . [Indeed, the defendants' customer's] credit score HAS GOTTEN SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE [similar to what happens to Rod Class' own SEMINAR customers who rely on his advice in their own court cases, such as Harold Stanley, who went to prison for 5 to 8 years]." (The immediately text is in the 19th full paragraph at about 33% through the text of the case.). For an explanation of how FEDERAL RICO applies to Class under these facts, read section "V C. Civil RICO" at about 85% through the text of the case.

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate, amateur legal theorist with a high school education WHO HAS A 100% FAILURE RATE IN 76 CONSECUTIVE COURT CASES. Class also has a history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS, is a MULTI-CONVICTED FELON and has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 2nd March 2018 at 00:26.

  2. Link to Post #2
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 2: "THE 14th AMENDMENT, SECTION 4, BOUNTY HUNTER HOAX"

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    CLASS PRETENDING TO BE A 14th AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER (NOTE FAKE EMBLEMS):
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22P...Rod+Class%22&*

    FAKE 14th AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER VEHICLES (NOTE FAKE EMBLEMS):
    http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/d...actant.159266/ (SCROLL DOWN TO THE 2ND AND 3RD PHOTOS.).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=8s (At :05-:20. LOOK IN LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF SCREEN).
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_impersonation (Note that the foregoing vehicles constitute a crime. Look for BOLD BLACK and BLUE TYPE).

    FAKE 14TH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER "COSTUME" (NOTE FAKE EMBLEMS):
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...ower_right.jpg (Class, posing in his "COSTUME");
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jWito8KuFI&t=167s (at 10:15);
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_impersonation (Note that the foregoing "COSTUMES"/"UNIFORMS" constitute a crime. Look for BOLD BLACK and BLUE TYPE).

    FAKE "14th AMENDMENT, SECTION 4, BOUNTY HUNTER" VIDEOS:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7EVPSf-9gw&t=61s (note video TITLE).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jWito8KuFI&t=163s (Here, Rod Class describes his imaginary powers, his imaginary duties and his imaginary court room victories while pretending to be a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter").
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912

    FAKE 14TH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER FILINGS:
    https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._18TH_2013.pdf (IN THE FIRST SEVERAL PARAGRAPHS)
    https://www.scribd.com/document/5219...e-to-AG-Office (AT PAGE 11 IN THE PARAGRAPHS ACTUALLY NUMBERED "5" and "6" AT ABOUT 50% THROUGHT THE TEXT)
    https://www.scribd.com/lists/3161481...Team-Documents (TAKE YOUR PICK OF DOCUMENTS)

    FALSE ALLEGATIONS THAT ROD CLASS IS A 14TH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER:
    https://alternativeaction.wordpress....r-to-the-navy/ (AT THE 3RD FULL PARAGRAPH)
    https://itnjcommittee.org/wp-content...C-Gun-Case.pdf (AT PAGE 2 BEGINNING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE 2ND PARAGRAPH)
    https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/...od-class-case/ (AT THE 3RD FULL PARAGRAPH)

    THE HOAX: Rod Class falsely claims to be a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter" and that, as such, he is EXTREMELY powerful, EXTREMELY important and that he represents an EXTREME threat to government agencies and officials in that imaginary capacity. But, none of this is so.

    BACKGROUND: Class mistakenly believes that all governmental agencies have public money that they should not have (the subject of a different comment). So, he set out to recover that missing public money and created for himself an appropriate TITLE, POSITION, EMBLEM, COSTUME, VEHICLE and some imaginary POWERS to help him in that regard. For his title, Class picked the term, "14 Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter". This is because both the term, "PUBLIC DEBT" and the term, "BOUNTIES" actually appear in the fourteenth amendment, section 4 and because such a title would help create the prestigious IMAGE he wanted. But, Class should have researched these terms first. He had absolutely NO IDEA what these terms actually meant.

    CLASSES AMATEUR LEGAL MISCONCEPTIONS:
    Class mistakenly defines a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter" as "Public Debt Collector" and/or a "Public Bounty Hunter". These mistaken definitions (along with his description of his imaginary role in that imaginary capacity) reflect TWO FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES that Class makes about the fourteenth amendment, section 4. First, Class mistakenly believes that the term, "public debt" means MONEY THAT OTHERS OWE TO THE PUBLIC. But, this is not so. (The term, "public debt", ACTUALLY MEANS MONEY THAT THE PUBLIC OWES TO OTHERS). Second, Class also mistakenly believes that the "bounties" referred to in the fourteenth amendment, section 4 are "bounties" that are owed and paid to those who find and recover MONEY THAT IS CURRENTLY OWED TO THE PUBLIC NOW. But, this is also not so. (The term, "bounties", referred to in the fourteenth amendment, section 4 ACTUALLY MEANS THE "BOUNTIES" THAT THE PUBLIC ONCE OWED (AND PAID) TO THOSE WHO HELPED THE UNION DEFEAT THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO.). But, Class does not know this. Not surprisingly, Class has NEVER found any missing public money, has NEVER recovered any missing public money and has NEVER been paid a "bounty" in connection with finding or recovering any missing public money.

    HOAX (CONTINUED):
    Regardless, in pretending to be a "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter" (as he mistakenly defines it), Class: 1). Claims to have a number of imaginary "duties" that he is "obligated" to perform in that imaginary capacity; 2). Signs and seals his court papers to that effect; 3). Wears a FAKE, homemade "COSTUME" falsely indicating such; 3). Marked his vehicles with FAKE vinyl decals falsely indicating such; 4). Adorned the "backdrop" of his backyard radio/video studio/set with a FAKE wall plague falsely indicating such; and 5). Files lawsuits and disrupts court proceedings pretending to be such. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912 (Note that this statute makes TWO DISTINCT ACTS felonies, "acting as such" OR while acting in such pretended character "demanding or obtaining" anything of value. Only one such act is required.).

    THE TRUTH:
    1). The term, “Public Debt” means MONEY THAT THE PUBLIC OWES TO OTHERS (not the other way around).
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/public-debt
    http://www.yourdictionary.com/public-debt
    https://www.thefreedictionary.com/public+debt

    2). The fourteenth amendment, section 4 DOES NOT CREATE OR ENFORCE A "BOUNTY" FOR THOSE WHO RECOVER MONEY THAT IS CURRENTLY OWED TO THE PUBLIC NOW. (See the law below.).

    3). The fourteenth amendment, section 4 ONCE REQUIRED THE PUBLIC TO PAY "BOUNTIES" TO THOSE (AND ONLY TO THOSE) WHO "SUPPRESS[ED]... INSURRECTION... [AND] REBELLION" (REFERRING TO THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO). (See the law below.).

    The fourteenth amendment, Section 4 reads:

    "The validity of the public debt of the Unites States [money that the public owes to others],... INCLUDING DEBTS INCURRED [by the public] FOR PAYMENT OF PENSIONS AND BOUNTIES [to others] FOR SERVICES [rendered] IN SUPPRESSING INSURRECTION OR REBELLION [referring to the Confederate South during the Civil War] SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED [means 'must be paid']." https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

    Id. Thus, the fourteenth amendment, section 4 IS EXCLUSIVELY ABOUT MONEY/DEBTS THAT THE PUBLIC ONCE OWED (AND PAID) TO OTHERS, NOT ABOUT MONEY/DEBTS THAT OTHERS CURRENTLY OWE TO THE PUBLIC NOW. Further, the ONLY "bounties" created or enforced by the fourteenth amendment WERE THOSE "BOUNTIES" THAT THE PUBLIC ONCE OWED (AND PAID) TO THOSE WHO HELPED THE UNION DEFEAT THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO. The 14th amendment DOES NOT CREATE OR ENFORCE "BOUNTIES" FOR THOSE FIND MONEY/DEBTS THAT OTHERS CURRENTLY OWE TO THE PUBLIC NOW. But, Class does not know this. (See the law below.).

    4). FACT: This provision in the United States Constitution was written immediately following the Civil War in direct response to a specific threat made by the southern states and their sympathizers. At the time (150 years ago), the Union had promised to pay "PENSIONS" and "BOUNTIES" to people who had helped the Union defeat the confederate South during the Civil War (to which the terms "INSURRECTION" and "REBELLION" refer in the 14th amendment, section 4). The Southern states objected to the payment of these "PENSIONS" and "BOUNTIES" (effectively "rewards" to people for defeating the confederate South during the Civil War) and they threatened to pass federal legislation banning the payment of these "PENSIONS" and BOUNTIES" in the event that they ever became a majority in Congress. SO, THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION WAS TO PREEMPTIVELY NULLIFY ANY FUTURE EFFORTS ON THE PART OF THE SOUTHERN STATES TO PASS FEDERAL LEGISLATION BANNING THE PAYMENT OF "PENSIONS" AND "BOUNTIES" TO PEOPLE THAT HAD HELPED THE UNION DEFEAT THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO. But, Rod Class does not know this. (See the law below.).

    5). CONCLUSION: Because it is IMPOSSIBLE for Class become a Union civil war soldier and to travel back in time 150 years ago to "SUPPRESS... [AN] INSURRECTION OR REBELLION" DURING THE CIVIL WAR, Class IS NOT now and has never been a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter". Indeed, he doesn’t even know the meaning of the term. (See the law below.).

    THE REAL "FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY":

    https://www.google.com/search?q=unio...w=1366&bih=613

    https://www.britannica.com/event/Bounty-System

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounty_jumper

    http://www.cincinnaticwrt.org/data/c...diers_pay.html (SEE PARAGRAPH 8 IN THIS DOCUMENT)

    WHAT A REAL "FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER" ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=unio...ivil+war%22+&*

    http://civilwartalk.com/threads/a-ro...unters.110966/

    WHAT A FAKE "FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER" LOOKS LIKE:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22P...Rod+Class%22&*

    THE LAW:

    THIS SECTION:
    1). CANNOT be used as the basis for "bounties" for services that DO NOT ARISE OUT OF THE CIVIL WAR.
    2). CANNOT be used to adversely affect the property rights of U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.
    3). DOES NOT even "come into play" UNLESS A GOVERNMENT "questions" (REFUSES TO PAY) a debt THAT THE PUBLIC OWES TO OTHERS.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 . LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "...[The] Plaintiff... cites... Section[]... IV [means "4"] of the Fourteenth Amendment which... protect[s] the validity of certain 'debts incurred [by the public] for payment of pensions and bounties [to others] for services [rendered] in suppressing insurrection or rebellion [referring to the Confederate South during the Civil War].' ...THE PROVISIONS IN THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT ARE... LIMITED TO THE CONTEXT OF THE IMMEDIATE AFTERMATH OF THE CIVIL WAR [read this phrase again], when officials of the union were concerned about the potential mischief that could result if former agents of the Confederacy and their sympathizers were to take control of Congress... . [The court then quoted the case immediately below in which the court] conclud[ed] that SECTION 4 OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 'WAS INTENDED TO PREVENT THE QUESTIONING OF THE WAR DEBT INCURRED BY THE UNION IN FIGHTING THE CIVIL WAR' [read this phrase again] and 'IS ONLY BROUGHT INTO PLAY [read this phrase again] when some state or federal government agency QUESTIONS [means "REFUSES TO PAY"] a debt [THAT IT OWES TO OTHERS, SUCH AS FORMER UNION CIVIL WAR SOLDIERS].'... . SECTION... 4 OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROVIDES NO BASIS [read this term again] FOR... A[]...BOUNTY IN THIS [MODERN ERA] CASE [read this entire phrase again] OR TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF UNITED STATES OFFICIALS OR EMPLOYEES IN ANY WAY [read this entire phrase again]." (The preceding text is in the 5th, 6th and 7th full paragraphs beginning at about 75% through the text of the case.).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 . LOOK FOR THE FOLLWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "The Fourteenth Amendment provides that '[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States [money that the public owes to others]... including debts incurred [by the public] for payment of pensions and bounties [to others] for services [rendered] in suppressing insurrection or rebellion [referring to the Confederate South during the Civil War], shall not be questioned [means "must be paid"].' THIS LITTLE USED PROVISION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS INTENDED TO PREVENT THE QUESTIONING OF [means "refusing to pay"] THE WAR DEBT INCURRED BY THE UNION IN FIGHTING THE CIVIL WAR BY ANY FUTURE CONGRESS CONTROLLED BY SOUTHERNERS OR THEIR SYMPATHIZERS. [Read this sentence again.] THIS SECTION ONLY COMES INTO PLAY WHEN SOME STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY QUESTIONS [means "REFUSES TO PAY"] A DEBT [THAT THE PUBLIC OWED TO OTHERS, SUCH AS FORMER UNION CIVIL WAR SOLDIERS] [Read that sentence again]." (The preceding text is in the 25th full paragraph, not including block indented portions for quoted text, in the section on the case entitled, "C. Has the Secretary 'Questioned' a Public Debt?" at about 80% through the text of the case.).

    FAKE "14th AMENDMENT, SECTION 4, BOUNTY HUNTER" VIDEOS:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7EVPSf-9gw&t=61s (note video TITLE).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jWito8KuFI&t=163s (Here, Rod Class describes his imaginary powers, his imaginary duties and his imaginary court room victories while pretending to be a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter").
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912

    All of this would be funny if it weren't so sad. So very, very sad.

    ANALYSIS:
    Note that Rod Class pathologically IMPERSONATES and IMITATES every type of person that he claims to HATE. For example, Class claims to hate lawyers. So, he IMPERSONATES them by pretending to be a "Private Attorney General" (as he mistakenly defines it) and he IMITATES them by writing FAKE legal papers & filing them in court, by pretending to represent others in court and by otherwise pretending to take action in that imaginary capacity. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22R...w=1366&bih=651. Class also claims to hate law enforcement officers. So, he IMPERSONATES them by wearing a homemade, FAKE law enforcement "COSTUME"/UNIFORM and by driving a fraudulently-marked, FAKE law enforcement vehicle (once actually equipped with an REAL, operable, law enforcement "BLUE LIGHT" system) and he IMITATES them by pretending to enforce imaginary laws and by otherwise pretending to take action in that imaginary capacity. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...ower_right.jpg; http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/d...actant.159266/ (scroll down to the 2ND & 3RD photos.). Class claims to hate other legal authority figures. So, he IMPERSONATES them by pretending to be a legal authority figure in an imaginary, alternative, GLOBAL legal system and he IMITATES them by otherwise pretending to take action in that imaginary capacity. http://houseofpraani.com/portfolio/itnj/; https://scannedretina.com/2015/05/27...itnj-launch-2/ (scroll down to about 35-40% through text of this page where Class describes himself as the "HEAD PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE ITNL", an imaginary, alternative, GLOBAL legal system); http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...n-3143508.html (Class, pretending to act as a legal authority figure in this imaginary, alternative, GLOBAL legal system); https://www.itnj.org/ (scroll down to the "MISSION" of this imaginary, alternative, GLOBAL legal system). This list could go on and on, but you get the point. Psychiatrists would have a "field day" analyzing this bizarre pattern of behavior.

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 76 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our ELECTED REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    More importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. These hoaxes include the "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'CERTIFICATE' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is a Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ANALYSIS:
    Rod Class (with his inability to read, his lack of education, his complete ignorance of the law, his delusional belief system, his worthless, amateur legal theories, his lack of honesty and his 100% failure rate in court in 76 consecutive losses) IS LIVING PROOF THAT THOSE WHO PRACTICE LAW (AND THOSE WHO TEACH THE LAW) SHOULD:
    1). BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE EDUCATION (a "Bachelor's Degree");
    2). BE REQUIRED TO ALSO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL THREE TO FOUR YEAR LAW SCHOOL EDUCATION (a "Juris Doctor's Degree");
    3). BE REQUIRED TO PASS THE STATE BAR EXAM (takes three days);
    4). BE REQUIRED TO UNDERGO A RIGOROUS STATE CHARACTER AND FITNESS BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION WHICH TAKES SEVERAL MONTHS OR YEARS (NO MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY, NO CRIMINAL HISTORY, honesty, credit history, interviews of employers, teachers, former co-workers, neighbors, relatives, taking finger print samples, taking hand writing samples, etc.).
    5). BE LICENSED BY THE STATE AND BE SUBJECT TO THE CONTINUOUS OVERSIGHT AND DISCIPLINE OF THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT, THE STATE SUPREME COURT (in order to protect the public from INCOMPETENCE and FRAUD of the type demonstrated here).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 1st March 2018 at 22:26.

  3. Link to Post #3
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 3: "THE JUDGE DALE HOAX" & "THE DEBRA JONES HOAX"

    PART I: THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX:

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCES BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05o4CpB9I8g&t=260s (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 2:25-4:00, 5:25-6:15, 9:05-9:20)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 42:10-49:15 IN PRETENDING TO REVIEW SECTIONS OF A "JUDGE DALE" FORGERY)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 7:15-7:55, 27:00-27:55, 31:15-33:10, 45:05-46:00, 52:35-53:45, 54:35-54:50)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgYbD6fcw8 (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 34:20-36:00)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAryrdGenL4 (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 1:30-1:45)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 51:50-53:00)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81qlF5v3WY8 (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 7:00-7:25)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4 (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 2:20-2:40).

    SIDE NOTE:
    FOR THREE MORE WORLD FAMOUS HOAXES BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER IS THIS HOAX, SCROLL DOWN TO THE "NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX" AT COMMENT NINETEEN (19) BELOW AND THE "SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX" & THE "REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX" AT COMMENT TWENTY TWO (22) BELOW. THEY ARE SIMPLY UNBELIEVABLE! REMEMBER, SCROLL DOWN TO COMMENT 19 AND COMMENT 22 BELOW.

    THE JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (BOOKS):
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....bk-format1.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....th-edition.pdf (SEE LIST OF AUTHORS AT BOTTOM OF 2ND PAGE).

    OTHER JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (ARTICLES):
    "WHISTLEBLOWER" ARTICLES:
    http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2012/...turned_22.html (scroll down about 10% through the text of this page to the BOLD RED TYPE);
    http://in5d.com/anonymous-judge-blow...le-are-slaves/ (note the TITLE);
    https://livingintheprivate.blogspot....for-court.html (scroll down to about 50% through the text of this page to the line immediately above the link in ALL BLUE TYPE for the term, "WHISTLEBLOWER" and "JUDGE DALE").
    "SPILLS THE BEANS" ARTICLES:
    https://mainerepublicemailalert.file...-the-beans.pdf (note the TITLE);
    https://ascendingstarseed.wordpress....lavery-system/ (note the TITLE);
    https://twitter.com/opptinnow/status/330437110874140672 (note TITLE).


    THE HOAX:
    Rodney "DALE" Class and his TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS published FAKE legal books online which they FRAUDULENTLY claimed were written by a "retired federal judge' named "Judge DALE".

    THE TRUTH:
    Rodney "DALE" Class and his TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS wrote every single word of these FORGERIES.

    EXPLANATION:
    "Judge DALE" is a hoax. This is the reason that you have never actually seen a LIVE APPEARANCE, VIDEO or PHOTOGRAPH of "Judge DALE". He does not exist. The person pretending to be "Judge DALE" in the "Judge DALE forgeries" and online is actually Rodney "DALE" Class, a functionally illiterate amateur legal theorist and PROFESSIONAL HOAXER and CHARLATAN with a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS (see comment FOUR below). Class does not know it yet, but his TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS in the "Judge DALE" hoax have already privately admitted to us that Rodney "DALE" Class really is "Judge DALE". So, Class' fraudulent denials to his VICTIMS in this regard are pointless and futile.

    In the "Judge DALE Hoax", Rodney "DALE" Class and his TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS distributed FAKE legal books online that revealed FAKE legal information WHICH THEY THEMSELVES ACTUALLY CREATED, but which they fraudulently told the American people were written by a FAKE “retired federal judge” named, “Judge DALE” (which uses Rodney DALE Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke on the American people).

    SIDE NOTE:
    Impersonating a federal judge is a federal FELONY. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912. Note that this statute makes two separate acts felonies, EITHER "acting as such" OR "demanding or obtaining" something of value while impersonating such. Only one such act is required. Under federal case law, using the term, "former", is NOT effective as a defense to such a charge.

    CLASS' INTERNET RADIO SHOW:
    Class has his own internet radio show on AIB Talkshoe Radio (spelled correctly). http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=48361&cmd=tc. The content of Class' radio show is simply a pre-recorded, telephone "CONFERENCE CALL" that Class made earlier. (Look for BOTH the terms, "JUDGE DALE" and "CONFERENCE CALL" in the 1st full paragraph in the following link.). http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....reset-and.html. (The TWO preceding links show that BOTH Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" just happen to host telephone "CONFERENCE CALLS", an amazing coincidence.).

    On his radio show, Class makes intentionally FALSE and FRAUDULENT claims about the law and the legal system to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We The People" and their appointees for doing their jobs. On his radio show, Class falsely claims that all governments and government agencies are private, for-profit "CORPORATIONS". (Look for the term, "ROD CLASS" and the term, "CORPORATE" in the 2nd full paragraph in this link). http://houseofpraani.com/portfolio/itnj/. On his radio show, Class also advocates suing the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and their agencies in ADMINISTRATIVE COURT using the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. (Read the description paragraph BELOW the title IN EACH of the following videos.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDNogI6nBGU; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdYzJBFfhqU.

    Ironically, "Judge DALE" also just happens to falsely claim that all governments and government agencies are private, for-profit "CORPORATIONS" and also advocates using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS". (Go to 3:00-4:00 in the following video.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05o4CpB9I8g&t=260s. (Look for the terms, "JUDGE DALE, "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" and "CORPORATIONS" in the first 5 full paragraphs in the following link.). http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....d-further.html. (Look for the terms, "JUDGE DALE, "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" and "CORPORATIONS" in the first 5 full paragraphs in the following link.). http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U..._printer.shtml. (The text in these SIX immediately preceding links shows that BOTH Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" just happen to falsely claim that all governments and government agencies are private, for-profit "CORPORATIONS" and BOTH of them just happen to recommend the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" in "ADMINISTRATIVE COURT", an amazing set of coincidences.).

    ANALYSIS:
    When combined, the text in the EIGHT immediately preceding links mean that BOTH Rodney "DALE" Class and "Judge DALE" just happen to do and say THE VERY SAME THINGS! Specifically, they BOTH just happen to host "CONFERENCE CALLS", they BOTH just happen to falsely claim that all governments and all government agencies are private, for-profit "CORPORATIONS" and they BOTH just happen to advocate suing our ELECTED representatives and their agencies using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS" in "ADMINISTRATIVE COURT", an amazing set of coincidences.

    SIDE NOTE:
    Not surprisingly, BOTH of Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS also just happen to falsely claim that all governments and government agencies are private for-profit "CORPORATIONS", another amazing coincidence. To understand the extent of THEIR OWN fraud in this regard, YOU MUST SEE THE FOLLOWING VIDEOS! They are simply UNBELIEVABLE! Note that NONE of the private, for-profit corporations referred to in any of the following videos HAVE ANY CONNECTION WHATSOEVER TO ANY FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT OR AGENCY. Instead, they are all ordinary, private, for-profit corporations with names that SOUND SIMILAR to governments or government agencies (like "Federal Express", for example). This means that contrary to the claims of Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS, the ordinary, private, for-profit corporation named the "United States Corporation Company" (referred to at 2:00-3:10 in the FIRST video below) IS NOT actually the government of the "United States of America". http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...ATES%201000090 (Scroll all the way down to the very bottom of this link and click on the FINAL document. Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS refer this document later in the FIRST video below.). Instead, the "United States Corporation Company" is merely a "registered agent" which accepts "service of process" (civil lawsuits) for other corporations doing business in Florida and is actually listed as such by the Florida Secretary of State, Division of Corporations. http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...0Company/Page1 (BE SURE TO SCROLL THROUGH ALL OF THE PAGES IN THIS LINK). (Note: Every corporation doing business in the state is required to have a "registered agent" inside the state to accept "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on its behalf. The "United States Corporation Company" is merely an ordinary, private, for-profit company provides that service to other such corporations (which are often out-of-state corporations that do not have an office in the state) for a fee. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/...0607.0505.html.). Further, at 4:30-4:45 in the FIRST video below, Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS also FRAUDULENTLY CHANGE THE NAME of one such ordinary, private, for-profit corporation TO MAKE IT SOUND EVEN MORE LIKE A GOVERNMENT AGENCY in order to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. Specifically, they "SWITCH" the name, "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." (THE REAL NAME) with the name, "Internal Revenue Service" (THE FAKE NAME) in order to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. This is precisely the reason that they do not show an ACTUAL PHOTO of this particular corporation's "corporate charter" in their video as they do with other "corporate charters" of the other corporations referred to in their video (BECAUSE IT WOULD SHOW THE CORPORATION'S "REAL NAME" WHICH WOULD EXPOSE THEIR FRAUD). See the truth about this particular fraud here. https://www.dropbox.com/s/04tmhmd08w...0Inc..pdf?dl=0 (Note that this ordinary, private, for-profit corporation, the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", WAS INCORPORATED IN DELAWARE.); http://www.hovindology.com/?p=80 (THIS LINK IS EXCELLENT. READ IT ALL.).

    VIDEOS BY ROD CLASS' CHARLATAN PARTNERS CLAIMING THAT ALL GOVERNMENTS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES ARE PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS:
    YOU MUST SEE THIS VIDEO! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (See the WHOLE VIDEO, but be especially certain to listen at 2:00-3:10 (for the "United States Corporation Company Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:30-4:45 (for the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc. Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:45-4:55, 5:55-6:10, 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 9:05-9:45, 22:00-22:50, 24:10-24:25, 25:55-26:45.);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (at 43:15-43:50, 52:30-53:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05o4CpB9I8g&t=260s (at 3:00-4:00, 5:25-6:15, 6:40-7:30, 7:55-8:50);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (at 42:10-42:35, 47:50--49:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45).

    THE JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (BOOKS):
    The “Judge DALE forgeries” include: “The Matrix And the US Constitution” (2010), “The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America” (2012) and “Lawfully Yours” (2014). In all of the “Judge DALE Forgeries”, Rodney "DALE" Class AND HIS TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS confirm their own false claims about the law and the legal system while FRAUDULENTLY pretending to be a FAKE, "retired federal judge" named, "Judge DALE". Like all of their false claims about the law and the legal system, their false claims in the “Judge DALE forgeries” were also designed and intended to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and their appointees for doing their jobs. As hard as it is to believe, Class’ TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS in this hoax still peddle all three of the “Judge 'DALE' forgeries” from their own personal websites DESPITE THAT EVERYONE KNOWS THEY ARE ENTIRELY FAKE.

    LINKS TO THE JUDGE 'DALE' FORGERIES" (BOOKS):
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....format_pdf.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....bk-format1.pdf (NOTE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "MATRIX", IN THE TITLE).

    SIDE NOTE: THE "MATRIX":
    Note that the title of the immediately preceding "Judge DALE forgery" (above) is "The 'MATRIX' And The US Constitution". This is significant because Rodney "DALE" Class and his TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS in manufacturing and peddling hoaxes use this "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", over and over in their online hoaxes. The following links provide excellent examples of their use of the "SIGNATURE" term, "MATRIX", in their online hoaxes.
    "MATRIX" HOAXES BY ROD CLASS:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=22s (First, at :30- :45, see an actual photo of the REAL "Judge DALE" standing inside the "MATRIX" as described in the (immediately preceding) "Judge DALE forgery" entitled, "The MATRIX and the US Constitution", by "Judge DALE", who is actually Rodney "DALE" Class);
    http://howtoexitthematrix.com/2015/0...by-judge-dale/ (self-explanatory);
    http://www.matrixfiles.com/Dale/TheG...ture-PART1.pdf (NOTE THE NAME OF WEBSITE)
    http://in5d.com/anonymous-judge-blow...le-are-slaves/ (scroll down to the 2nd and 3rd TITLES and note the term "MATRIX");
    http://exitthematrix.org/?reqp=1&req...EvLaE5pv5jLab= (a website no longer used).
    "MATRIX" HOAXES BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX:
    https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...0.ZhxJPdicCG4;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (at 27:00-27:15);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sykRuXXNJzU;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX5IJMevyP8;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc;
    http://noliesradio.org/archives/134062 (note "QUANTUM MATRIX RADIO".);
    http://www.globaltruth.net/jeff-rens...g-the-matrix/;
    http://www.oom2.com/t34873-jeff-rens...ing-the-matrix.
    Note that Rodney "DALE" Class (in the "MATRIX" VIDEO above), "Judge DALE" (in "The MATRIX And The US Constitution" FORGERY above) and his TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS in the "Judge DALE Hoax" (in their ARTICLES, WEBSITES and VIDEOS above) all just happen to use the same, shared, common, UNIQUE, "SIGNATURE" term in the wording of their online HOAXES, "MATRIX" (and elsewhere, "BOMBSHELL", etc.), another amazing coincidence! (See comment FIVE (5) below for their use of the same, shared, common, UNIQUE "SIGNATURE" term "BOMBSHELL" in the wording of their HOAXES.).

    LINKS TO THE "JUDGE 'DALE' FORGERIES" (BOOKS) (CONTINUED)
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-constitution/
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....th-edition.pdf
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....ed-states1.pdf
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/judge-dale/
    (NOTE IN THE LINKS ABOVE THAT BOTH OF ROD CLASS' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS IN THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX JUST HAPPEN TO PUBLISH THE CLAIMS OF BOTH "JUDGE DALE" AND RODNEY "DALE" CLASS ON THEIR OWN WEBSITES, an amazing coincidence of support and affiliation.).

    OTHER "JUDGE 'DALE' FORGERIES" (ARTICLES):
    Note that most of the other FORGED “Judge DALE” articles posted online are mere re-prints of section five of “The Great American Adventure” under different names (“Legal Advice From A Retired Judge Turned Whistle Blower”, “Retired Federal Judge Spills The Beans”, etc.).
    "WHISTLEBLOWER" EXAMPLES:
    http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2012/...turned_22.html (scroll down about 10% through the text of this page to the BOLD RED TYPE);
    http://in5d.com/anonymous-judge-blow...le-are-slaves/ (note the TITLE);
    https://livingintheprivate.blogspot....for-court.html (scroll down to about 50% through the text of this page to the line immediately above the link in ALL BLUE TYPE for the term, "WHISTLEBLOWER" and "JUDGE DALE").
    "SPILLS THE BEANS" EXAMPLES:
    https://mainerepublicemailalert.file...-the-beans.pdf (note the TITLE);
    https://ascendingstarseed.wordpress....lavery-system/ (note the TITLE);
    https://twitter.com/opptinnow/status/330437110874140672 (note TITLE).

    LINKS TO RELATED DOCUMENTS:
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/rod-class/
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...ey-dale-class/
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...-with-justice/
    (NOTE IN THE LINKS ABOVE THAT BOTH OF ROD CLASS' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS IN THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX JUST HAPPEN TO PUBLISH THE CLAIMS OF BOTH "JUDGE DALE" AND RODNEY "DALE" CLASS ON THEIR OWN WEBSITES, an amazing coincidence of BOTH support and affiliation.).

    LINKS TO OTHERS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX":
    http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....reset-and.html (Note the webmaster of this site.).
    http://removingtheshackles.blogspot....d-further.html (Note the webmaster of this site.).
    http://www.shiftfrequency.com/admira...ee/#more-26988 (Note the webmaster of this site.).

    ANALYSIS:
    Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS do not lie to those for whom they have respect. They only lie to those for whom they have no respect. The lies reflected in the "Judge DALE Hoax" speak volumes about what these TWO CHARLATANS really think of the American people. They hate the American people. Lying to the American people is a vicious attack on the American people.

    THESE CHARLATANS' PATTERN OF HOAXES:
    ROD CLASS AND HIS TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS are behind the “Judge 'DALE' Hoax”, the ”BOMBSHELL: Rod Class Has Obtained His FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE RULING That All Governmental Agencies are 'PRIVATE ENTITIES' Or 'PRIVATE CONTRACTORS' Hoax”, the “A North Carolina Judge Has WARNED All State POLICE To Put Their PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES Hoax”, the “Court Registry Investment System Hoax” and numerous other legal hoaxes, all of which he uses to “TRICK” his own followers into believing his intentionally false and fraudulent claims about the law and the legal system.

    SIDE NOTE:
    FOR THREE MORE WORLD FAMOUS HOAXES BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER IS THIS HOAX, SCROLL DOWN TO THE "NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX" AT COMMENT NINETEEN (19) BELOW AND THE "SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX" & THE "REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX" AT COMMENT TWENTY TWO (22) BELOW. THEY ARE SIMPLY UNBELIEVABLE! REMEMBER, SCROLL DOWN TO COMMENT 19 AND COMMENT 22 BELOW.

    ABOUT ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER IN THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX" AND SEVERAL OTHER ROD CLASS HOAXES:
    Rodney "DALE" Class' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER in the "Judge 'DALE' Hoax" (and several other Rod Class hoaxes) is a well-known, PROFESSIONAL CHARLATAN, HOAXER and SELF-PROMOTER. She does nothing but create, manufacture, publish and peddle hoaxes (her specialty). She has long engaged in a pattern of FORGING FAKE, COUNTERFEIT documents and FRAUDULENTLY attributing those FORGERIES to others, like the federal government or its agencies (examples will soon be posted here). When not FORGING her own FAKE, COUNTERFEIT documents for that purpose, she takes documents written by others THAT SHE KNOWS TO BE POLITICAL "FICTION" (or political "SPOOFS") and FRAUDULENTLY tells her gullible followers that they are "REAL" documents written by "REAL GOVERNMENT INSIDERS". Like all of Rod Class' claims, all of the claims made by Rodney DALE Class' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER in the "Judge DALE Hoax" are intended to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and our Republican form of government.

    This CHARLATAN woman is behind ALL THREE of the "Judge DALE forgeries" (all of which she co-wrote with Rod Class), including "The MATRIX And The US Constitution" (2010), The Great American Adventure: Secrets of America" (2012) & "Lawfully Yours" (2014), the "Judge DALE Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "BOMBSHELL: Rod Class Has Obtained his "FOURTH" Administrative Ruling That All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' [or 'Private Contractors'] Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "A North Carolina Judge Has Warned State Police Officers To Put Their Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "Federal Government Is A Private, For-Profit Corporation Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "B.A.R. Card Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "'Esquire' Is A TITLE OF NOBILITY Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "British Accreditation Registry Hoax [B.A.R. Hoax]" (with Rod Class), the "NASA War Document Hoax" (without Rod Class), the "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax" (without Rod Class), the "Report From Iron Mountain Hoax" (without Rod Class), the "FAKE Jim Traficant Speech Hoax" (without Rod Class) and numerous other hoaxes, all of which she uses to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people for her own selfish purposes.


    PART II: THE DEBRA JONES HOAX:

    FIRST, SEE THE DEBRA JONES HOAX HERE:
    https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/...e-thanks-to-j/ (at the 1st full paragraph).
    http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...=8&pageSize=15 (Click on Episode 869 dated 07-08-2014.).

    Class has his own homemade, internet radio show. On July 8, 2014, in Episode 869 of his radio show (described above), Class purported (means "pretended") to bring in a "LEGAL INSIDER" as a guest and introduced her as "former attorney" and "former law enforcement officer", "Debra Jones’’. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...=8&pageSize=15 (Click on the actual radio show here, dated 07/08/2014. It is simply unbelievable!).

    Not surprisingly, during this 2 hour 43 minute show, Jones made the same type of utterly delusional AMATEUR claims about the law and the legal system that Class himself makes. But, Jones also claimed that: 1). as a “former police woman”, she and her fellow officers did nothing but intentionally break the law to intentionally harm the public; and that 2). as a “former attorney”, she, the judges, the prosecutors and her fellow attorneys did nothing but intentionally break the law to intentionally harm the public.

    Class’ radio audience was understandably SHOCKED and HORRIFIED by the claims of Jones whom they genuinely believed was a REAL "legal insider", a REAL "former police officer" and a REAL "former attorney" who was actually telling them the TRUTH. This radio show became an internet sensation, much to the delight of Class and Jones (because it successfully incited the hatred and violence that is was intended to incite). https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/...e-thanks-to-j/. (Read the comments of the VICTIMS of this hoax here, below this fraudulent article. They are simply unbelievable!).

    THE TRUTH:
    There was only one problem. THE WHOLE THING WAS ONE BIG HOAX! Before putting her on his internet radio show, Class already knew that Jones WAS NOT a “legal insider”, WAS NOT a "former attorney" and WAS NOT a "former law enforcement officer". In fact, Class already knew that Jones was EVERY BIT THE FRAUD AND CHARLATAN THAT HE WAS (otherwise, he would not have had her on his radio which does nothing but peddle FRAUD and HOAXES).

    ABOUT JONES:
    1. Jones’ REAL name is "Debra Jenks Jones";
    2. Jones is 51 years old;
    3. Jones lives in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State. (This is why many of her seminars are conveniently held in nearby Yelp, Washington State);
    4. Jones HAS NEVER HAD a professional license of ANY TYPE from ANY STATE (which means that she was NEVER an attorney anywhere at any time). This is why Jones will not reveal the name of the law school from which she allegedly graduated or the name of the state(s) from which she was allegedly received her license to practice law;
    5. Jones was NEVER a "law enforcement officer". This is why Jones will not reveal the name and location of the law enforcement agency/ies at which she was allegedly so employed;
    6. Jones STILL solicits and collects money from her victims for seminars by FRAUDULENTLY claiming to be a "former police officer" and a former "police woman".
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUvcF--JUMs (Note description paragraph below the title).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxeC_k-765g (Note that the seminar depicted in this video was conveniently held in Yelp, Washington state, near Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington state, where Jones actually lives).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w-pQeOmY9o (Jones' business name and logo).
    http://protrustacademy.com/contacts/ (Note Jones' FAKE "Oakland, California" address on the "CONTACTS" page on this website. Jones published this FAKE, OUT-OF-STATE ADDRESS on her website in order to prevent angry seminar customers from being able to find her to get their money back upon learning that the truth about her.).

    SIDE NOTE:
    It is a STATE crime to impersonate an "attorney" or a "law enforcement officer”.
    https://www.law.com/newyorklawjourna...0180028114002;
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_impersonation (look for the term "FAKE");
    It is a FEDERAL FELONY to use a "means of INTERSTATE commerce" (like the internet) to commit fraud (like soliciting money for seminars by fraudulently claiming to be a "former attorney", "former police officer" or by fraudulently claiming to be "Private Attorney General" who can "train" others to become the same).
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1343;
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_and_wire_fraud;
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tte81hxii...6.29.2017.pdf;
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...ower_right.jpg;
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...eHsTCpkma?dl=0 (CLICK ON ALL FIVE LINKS);
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...l%20Seals?dl=0
    http://saynotopas.com/common-law-grand-jury-links/ (scroll down to about 25% through the text of this page);
    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...n-3143508.html (scroll down to about 25% through the text of this page);
    http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/...es-jun-23.html (scroll down about 10% through the text of this page to the BOLD RED TYPE);
    https://scannedretina.com/2015/05/15...riminal-abuse/ (scroll down to about 5% through the text of the page).
    VICTIMS who have paid for such fraudulent seminars may recover THREE TIMES their money back under FEDERAL RICO (plus attorney fees and costs) and may ALSO recover PUNITIVE DAMAGES for FRAUD and MISREPRESENTATION under STATE law.

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 76 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. These hoaxes include the "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'CERTIFICATE' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C. 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ANALYSIS:
    ROD CLASS (with his inability to read, his lack of education, his ignorance of the law, his delusional belief system, his worthless, amateur legal theories, his lack of honesty and his 100% failure rate in court in 76 consecutive losses) IS LIVING PROOF THAT THOSE WHO PRACTICE LAW (AND THOSE WHO TEACH THE LAW) SHOULD:
    1). BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE EDUCATION (a "Bachelor's Degree");
    2). BE REQUIRED TO ALSO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL THREE TO FOUR YEAR LAW SCHOOL EDUCATION (a "Juris Doctor's Degree");
    3). BE REQUIRED TO PASS THE STATE BAR EXAM (takes three days);
    4). BE REQUIRED TO UNDERGO A RIGOROUS STATE CHARACTER AND FITNESS BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION WHICH TAKES SEVERAL MONTHS OR YEARS (NO MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY, NO CRIMINAL HISTORY, honesty, credit history, interviews of employers, teachers, former co-workers, neighbors, relatives, taking finger print samples, taking hand writing samples, etc.).
    5). BE LICENSED BY THE STATE AND BE SUBJECT TO THE CONTINUOUS OVERSIGHT AND DISCIPLINE OF THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT, THE STATE SUPREME COURT (in order to protect the public from INCOMPETENCE and FRAUD).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 3rd March 2018 at 23:50.

  4. Link to Post #4
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 4: "THE COURT SEALED THE COURT FILE BECAUSE MY AMATEUR 'PAPERWORK' WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED EVERY PRIOR CASE IN HISTORY HOAX”

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWKEmiMZTOc&t=348s. LISTEN FOR THE FOLLOWING FRAUDULENT CLAIMS BY ROD CLASS IN THIS VIDEO: "Ladies and gentlemen, I want you to use your own common sense. WHY WOULD THEY SEAL MY FILES FROM PUBLIC VIEWING? If they was [sic] worthless, if they had no value and they meant nothing, WHY WOULD THEY SEAL EVERY SINGLE FILE THAT I FILED IN?" (at :45-1:25); "[Class, now pretends to quote an imaginary college professor who Class claims said] 'That one single page' [referring to a single page in a 4 page Rod Class document] WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED EVERY CASE IN THE COUNTRY.'" (at 3:25-3:50); "THIS IS WHY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE SEALED." (at 4:15-4:25); "When they took me back to the back cell... [the government attorney] come [sic] back. I looked at him [and] he said [Class, now pretends to quote a government attorney who Class claims said], 'Rod, YOUR PAPERWORK WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED EVERY COURT CASE IN THIS COUNTRY and they can't allow you to do that.' THAT IS WHY MY PAPERWORK IS SEALED, ladies and gentlemen." (at 5:35-6:05); "Ladies and gentlemen, this [referring to his delusional, amateur legal theories] has been laid out in all my documents. THAT'S WHY MY DOCUMENTS ARE SEALED. This is why... when I was arrested the first time, these people were ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED of me. Now that I have put my documentation in, they are ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED of me. THAT'S WHY THIS PAPERWORK IS SEALED, ladies and gentlemen." (at 8:50-9:20); "[My] knowing how these people operate TERRIFIES these people.... . THIS IS WHY THIS PAPERWORK IS SEALED." (at 12:35-12:42); "They can't afford to have this [worthless, delusional] information out." (at 13:30-13:35): "These people are ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED---ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED [of me and my amateur paperwork]." (at 13:50-14:00); "THEY WOULD NOT SEAL A FILE IF THEY WAS [sic] NOT SCARED OF IT. THEY ONLY SEAL FILES WHEN THERE IS INFORMATION IN THERE THAT THEY DON'T WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW." (at 18:55-19:10); "THE PAPERWORK WAS THAT GOOD... AND [if you understood my delusional, amateur legal theories set forth in my paperwork] IT WOULD MAKE ABSOLUTE SENSE TO YOU WHY MY PAPERWORK WAS SEALED." (at 19:35-19:50).

    SIDE NOTE:
    Note that one of Class' "SIGNATURE" acts of fraud (reflected above) is to PRETEND to quote "AUTHORITY FIGURES" (who ALWAYS just happen to AGREE with him and PRAISE him) in connection with imaginary (AND ALWAYS, SECRET AND UNWITNESSED) conversations THAT NEVER ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE. Example: "THE __________(fill in the blank with an "AUTHORITY FIGURE", such as: "attorney from Jenner & Block", "Licensed Psychiatrist", "Judge", "District Attorney", "Prosecutor", "Attorney General", "Professor", CIA, FBI, NSA, etc.) SECRETLY PULLED ME TO THE SIDE WHEN NOBODY WAS LOOKING AND SECRETLY TOLD ME WHEN NOBODY COULD HEAR, __________ (fill the blank with AGREEMENT and PRAISE, such as: "There was nothing wrong with your paperwork."; "You are a legal genius."; "We know that you are right."; "Your paperwork would turn the entire legal world on its head.", "We are terrified of you", "[In terms of global importance,] we put you right up there with Ed Snowden as a whistle-blower." ). Sound familiar? https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._Two_Month.pdf (Scroll down to the 4th page, 2nd paragraph, FINAL sentence in that paragraph).

    SEE THE HOAX (CONTINUED)
    FRAUDULENT ARTICLES TO THE SAME EFFECT:
    http://sitsshow.blogspot.ca/2014/11/...t-here-is.html. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE: "COURT SEALS RECORDS DUE TO [the] VORACITY OF ROD'S DEFENSE." (The preceding text is in the title of this article.).; "HIS PAPERWORK HAS BEEN SEALED... [because] IT WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED ALL OF THE COURT CASES THAT CAME BEFORE [it], because of the corruption." (in the 7th full paragraph at about 20% through the text of the article.).

    http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.co...1-25-14/112940 LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "Rod Class is under 'House-Arrest.' HIS COURT PAPERWORK HAS BEEN SEALED... [because] IT WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED ALL OF THE COURT CASES THAT CAME BEFORE [it], because of the corruption. (in the 1st paragraph.).


    THE HOAX:
    Rod Class falsely claims that the court in his Washington, D.C. case "sealed" the court file in that case because his amateur "paperwork" (contained in that court file) would have "overturned all of the court cases that [ever] came before" it. But, this is not so.

    THE TRUTH:
    As a courtesy to Rod Class, the court "sealed" the court file in that case BECAUSE IT CONTAINED HIS PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS.

    FACT:
    Because court files are public, courts often "seal" court records TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY of certain types of litigants such as juvenile offenders, victims of sexual assault, parties to an adoption AND PERSONS WHOSE PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS ARE CONTAINED IN THE COURT FILE. (1)

    ANALYSIS: Thus, in creating this hoax, Rod Class actually took the court's EXTRAORDINARY ACT OF KINDNESS TO HIM (in sealing the court file TO PROTECT HIS PRIVACY) and FRAUDULENTLY told his followers that this EXTRAORDINARY ACT OF KINDNESS TO HIM was instead AN ACT OF "CORRUPTION" intended to protect the government from the imaginary threat of his worthless, delusional, amateur paperwork contained in the court file.

    ANALYSIS:
    The delusional claims that Rod Class made in the video above ("My [amateur] paperwork would have overturned every case that came before [it].", "These people were ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED of me.") reflect just how COMPLETELY DIVORCED Rod Class is from reality, something that the judges in this case IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZED and repeatedly protected him against (by PAYING FOR him to be examined by a licensed psychiatrist, by PAYING an attorney to represent his interests at the trial level, by AGREEING to a plea deal that he (as a previously convicted felon) WAS NOT LEGALLY ELIGIBLE FOR, wherein he literally walked out of court a "free man" (without even so much as probation) and by actually PAYING Jenner & Block to represent his interests on appeal, despite that he had already PLED GUILTY and already WAIVED his right to appeal to get the plea deal). The courts in this case could not have possibly done more TO PROTECT ROD CLASS from the consequences of his being mentally ill.

    CLASS' D.C. CASE:
    Class was caught "carrying" in his car "dangerous weapons" onto U.S. Capitol "grounds". Class was the CHARGED WITH A FELONY and FACED SERIOUS PRISON TIME. What's more, Class (who only has a high school education and who is functionally illiterate) ASKED THE COURT IF HE COULD REPRESENT HIMSELF. To make matters even worse, Class EXHIBITED THE SIGNS OF MENTAL ILLNESS. http://www.coatconference.com.au/res...nts_2017_6.pdf (Class EXHIBITED ALL OF THE SYMPTOMS listed on unnumbered page 6. Look for the four LIME GREEN squares.). Note the SYMPTOM, "NARCISSISTIC" https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-...s/syc-20366662 (Scroll down to "SYMPTOMS"); https://www.healthyplace.com/persona...pd-definition/ (Scroll down to 45% through the text of this page for a list of symptoms in and around BOLD PRINT) and note the SYMPTOM, "MENDACIOUS" (CLICK ON BOLD BLUE TYPE HERE) http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/mendacious ; http://vocabulary-vocabulary.com/dic...mendacious.php.

    It is customary in such circumstances for the court to have such a defendant UNDERGO A PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION before making a decision as to whether such a defendant may represent himself. The purpose of such a psychiatric examination is to determine whether such a defendant is mentally competent TO MAKE THE DECISION TO REPRESENT HIMSELF, NOT TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH A DEFENDANT IS MENTALLY CAPABLE OF ACTUALLY REPRESENTING HIMSELF. (2) So, on February 3rd, 2014, the court ordered Class to undergo a psychiatric examination and appointed a psychiatrist for that purpose. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ych-Evaluation (quoting the actual court order). After the psychiatric examination, the clerk filed Class' psychiatric records in the court file. So, the court properly "sealed" the court file TO PREVENT THE PUBLIC FROM HAVING ACCESS TO CLASS' PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS. (3)

    Rod Class exhibited then, and exhibits now EVERY SINGLE SYMPTOM of persons suffering from "Querulous Paranoia", "Litigious Insanity" and "Litigious Schizophrenia". (4)

    PSYCHIATRIC EXAM RESULTS:
    Based on all the evidence, the court determined that Class WAS NOT mentally capable of actually representing himself. While OBVIOUSLY TRUE, this determination was legally irrelevant. (Under the law, the court is only supposed to determine whether such a defendant is mentally competent enough to make the decision to represent himself.). Clearly, the court here was trying to protect Class from the consequences of his being mentally ill. Regardless, the court made a second determination and found that Class was mentally competent ENOUGH to make the decision to represent himself. Yet, because Class was NOT mentally capable of actually representing himself in the case, the court appointed an attorney to represent Class anyway. Because Class wanted to represent himself, the court "HUMORED" Class by calling his court-appointed attorney his "STAND-BY COUNSEL".

    THE "PAPERWORK":
    Amateur legal theories are pure "pretend" AND CANNOT "OVERTURN" ANYTHING. The amateur "paperwork" that Class misguidedly brags about in this hoax was 36 "motions" reflecting classic amateur legal theories ("capital letters", "fictional entities", "natural persons", "corporations", "living flesh and blood man with a soul", "Uniform Commercial Code", "registered trade name", "Coram Nobis", etc.). To see just how likely it was that Class' amateur "paperwork" would have "overturned all of the court cases that [ever] came before [it]", simply click on the first link immediately below. This is the court's ACTUAL RESPONSE to the very amateur "paperwork" that Class misguidedly brags about in this HOAX. Look for the term, "DENIED", after EACH and EVERY such amateur legal theory.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40003 . LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND PHRASES IN THIS CASE: "[Rod Class'] Motions are... UTTERLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE [A SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS]. Furthermore, most of... [his] Motions purport to CITE LEGAL PRINCIPLES THAT... DO NOT EXIST [A CERTAIN SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS] or are provisions of CIVIL law [that are] WHOLLY INAPPLICABLE to the issues in this CRIMINAL case [ALSO A SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS]." (The preceding text is in the 10th full paragraph of the case at the section entitled, "II. DISCUSSION". To understand just how and DELUSIONAL, IRRELEVANT and INAPPLICABLE Class' amateur legal theories were in this case, read the 2nd sentence of Ruling 6, the 1st sentence of Ruling 10, the last sentence of 4th paragraph of ruling 13, the 1st clause of the 1st sentence of Ruling 14, all of Ruling 16, the 1st sentence of Ruling 21, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th paragraphs of ruling 22, the 2nd sentence of the 3rd paragraph of Ruling 23, all of Ruling 27, all of Ruling 33, Footnote 6, Footnote 7, Footnote 8, Footnote 9 and Footnote 10.); (QUOTES CONTINUED) "Defendant [referring to Rod Class] objects to... his name in all CAPITAL LETTERS... contending that CAPITAL LETTERS only apply to a 'FICTIONAL' [the court places quotation marks around this term to make fun of it] ENTITY or a CORPORATION, and not 'A LIVING FLESH AND BLOOD MAN' [the court places quotation marks around this term to make fun of it] such as himself. This... [delusional amateur legal theory] and the related argument that the use of CAPITAL LETTERS somehow deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction find [means "have"] NO SUPPORT IN THE LAW and, in fact, HAVE BEEN SQUARELY REJECTED by at least one court... [who described such delusional amateur legal theories as being] "PATENTLY WITHOUT MERIT"... . To the extent that there is any doubt [again making fun of Class' delusional amateur legal theory], the person charged in this case is Rodney Class THE HUMAN BEING, AND NOT A CORPORATION OR OTHER "FICTIONAL ENTITY" [the court places quotation makes around this term to make fun of it], AS THE DEFENDANT [Rod Class] SUGGESTS... . [This] MOTION SHALL BE DENIED" (the preceding text is in the 1st, 2nd and 4th paragraphs under Ruling 1 in the case).; "Living man with a (Soul)"; "To the extent that Defendant [Rod Class] argues that the criminal provisions under which he was charged... ONLY APPLY TO BUSINESS ENTITIES, GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS and other CORPORATE 'PERSONS', BUT NOT TO NATURAL PERSONS SUCH AS HIMSELF, this argument [this delusional amateur legal theory] is CONTRADICTED by the plain language of the laws under which he was charged. ONLY NATURAL PERSONS are capable of "CARRY[ING] a firearm [artificial 'persons' cannot "CARRY" a firearm OR "DANGEROUS WEAPONS"]. [The statute under which Class was charged reads] '[an] INDIVIDUAL... MAY NOT CARRY... ON THE GROUNDS... OF THE CAPITOL BUILDINGS... A FIREARM... OR DANGEROUS WEAPON [such a machete in the driver's side door, 14 knives and daggers, 1 completely illegal switch blade knife and 3 more axes]'... . Moreover, ...[the statute under which Class was charged] EXPLICITLY REFERS TO AN 'INDIVIDUAL[']..., thereby making it clear that its prohibitions apply to a NATURAL PERSON such as the Defendant [Rod Class], and not to a CORPORATE PERSON [which cannot "CARRY" a "FIREARM" or OTHER "DANGEROUS WEAPONS" onto CAPITOL GROUNDS]... . DENIED" (The foregoing text is in the 4th, 5th and 8th paragraphs of Ruling 8 in the case.); "[Rod Class] asserts that...[his] BIRTH NAME has been converted to a 'REGISTERED TRADE' NAME in violation of the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE... . These allegations [these delusional amateur legal theories] ARE UNSUPPORTED AND IRRELEVANT [as] to whether [the] Defendant [Rod Class] violated... [the statute in question]... . [This] Motion shall be DENIED" (This text is in the only paragraph in Ruling 34 of the case.).

    FACT:
    Rod Class falsely claims that the very amateur "paperwork" (that the court discredits above) was SO GOOD that it resulted in his case going to the Supreme Court. But, this is not so. Class' attorneys (not Class) took this case to the Supreme Court in an effort to change the law "ON APPEALS" FOLLOWING "GUILTY PLEAS" IN PLEA BARGAINS (a subject that Class never even knew about and never raised anywhere at any time in any case). Class' attorneys merely used Class' case as a "vehicle" to get that ENTIRELY DIFFERENT issue before the Court. Any other case involving "AN APPEAL" AFTER A "GUILTY PLEA" IN A PLEA BARGAIN would have served the same purpose. We predict that Class' attorneys will win the case at the Supreme Court ONLY BECAUSE neither Class nor his amateur paperwork (or amateur legal theories) were in any way involved with that appeal.

    REALITY CHECK:
    The people involved in this case were not "ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED" of paperwork that was "UTTERLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE" (A SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS).
    2). The people involved in this case were not "ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED" of "LEGAL PRINCIPLES THAT... DO NOT EXIST" (A CERTAIN SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS).
    3). The people involved in this case were not "ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED" of legal principles "[that] are provisions of CIVIL law [that are] WHOLLY INAPPLICABLE to the issues IN THIS CRIMINAL CASE" (ALSO A SIGN OF MENTAL ILLNESS).
    4). The people involved in this case were not "ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED" of a functionally-illiterate, amateur legal theorist, with barely a high school education WHO HAS A 100% FAILURE RATE IN COURT IN 76 FAILED ATTEMPTS.

    FOOTNOTES:
    Footnote 1. COURTS OFTEN SEAL COURT RECORDS TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF PERSONS WHOSE PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS ARE CONTAINED IN THE COURT FILE.
    (SAMPLE CASES)
    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "Plaintiff [a prison inmate who sued government authorities over his MENTAL ANGUISH]... states that he SEEK[S] A COURT ORDER TO SEAL HIS MEDICAL [psychiatric] RECORDS... WHICH ARE TO BE FILED WITH THE COURT [in the court file so as to]... TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE [of those records]... . HE ALSO STATES THAT HE DO[ES] NOT WANT [HIS] MEDICAL RECORDS TO BE DISCLOSED OUTSIDE THE CASE... AND WIND UP ON TV FOR DISCUSSION OR ON THE INTERNET OR FOR PERSONAL USE." (This text is in the 3rd full paragraph, not including block intended portions, in the section of the case entitled, "Section F. Sealing Medical Records" at about 80% through the text of the case.).; "[The court responded by saying] I RECOGNIZE THE PLAINTIFF'S CONCERNS REGARDING THE AVAILABLILITY OF HIS SENSITIVE MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH INFORMATION [read this phrase again] IN A PUBLIC FORUM. I [therefore] CONCLUDE THAT THERE IS GOOD CAUSE TO PLACE [the] PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFIED MEDICAL RECORDS UNDER SEAL... ." (This text is in the 4rd full paragraph, not including block intended portions, in the section of the case entitled, "Section F. Sealing Medical Records" at about 82% through the text of the case.).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...2&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THE CASE: "This appeal requires us to... [address] statutory provisions affecting the DISCLOSURE of privileged MEDICAL... RECORDS, PARTICULARLY THOSE PERTAINING TO AN INDIVIDUAL'S MENTAL HEALTH" [read that phrase again]. (The preceding text is in the 1st sentence of the case.). "... [The law] appears to LIMIT THE DISCLOSURE OF COURTORDERED PRIVATE [mental health] REPORTS IN... [court] CASES. It [the law] provides,... that A COURT-ORDERED PRIVATE [mental health] EVALUATION REPORT COMPILED BY A STATE LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONAL [read this phrase again] OF ANY PARTY [such a Rod Class]... 'SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CLERK, WHO WILL [means "shall'] SEAL SUCH [mental health] REPORT [to protect the privacy of that party]... ." (The immediately preceding text is in the 2nd half of footnote 4 near the very end of the case.).

    (SAMPLE RULES)
    https://law.justia.com/cases/florida...5/83927-0.html
    LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "[Florida Rule 2.051(9)(A)(v)-(vi) reads] The public shall have access to all records of the judicial branch... EXCEPT... 9) ANY COURT RECORD DETERMINED TO BE CONFIDENTIAL IN A CASE... ON THE GROUNDS THAT (A) CONFIDENTIALITY [sealing] IS REQUIRED TO... (vi) AVOID SUBSTANTIAL INJURY TO A PARTY [such as Rod Class] BY DISCLOSURE OF MATTERS PROTECTED A... PRIVACY RIGHT [as a person often has with respect to their confidential psychiatric records]... ." (This text begins in the 12th full paragraph at about 45% through the text of the case.).

    http://www.illinois17th.com/index.ph...=382&Itemid=75. Note: Like Florida, Illinois generally permits public access to court files "[EXCEPT] ... (b) FITNESS REPORTS, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND/OR PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATIONS[.] Fitness reports, PSYCHOLOGICAL and/or PSYCHIATRIC REPORTS [read this phrase again] SHALL BE [must be] IMPOUNDED [means "sealed" and actually "removed" from the court file]... . (d) MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS[.] MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS SHALL BE IMPOUNDED [means "sealed" and actually "removed" from the court file]... ." (The immediately preceding text begins in section 16.02 at about 30% through the text of the rule.).

    Footnote 2: THE PURPOSE OF SUCH A PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION:
    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "A criminal defendant... MAY NOT WAIVE HIS RIGHT TO COUNSEL... UNLESS HE DOES SO 'COMPETENTLY [this is the key word] AND INTELLIGENTLY.'" (The preceding text is in the 8th full paragraph, not including block indented portions, at about 20% through the case.).; "[But,] THE COMPETENCE THAT IS REQUIRED OF A [criminal] DEFENDANT SEEKING TO WAIVE HIS RIGHT TO COUNSEL IS THE COMPETENCE TO WAIVE THE RIGHT, NOT THE COMPETENCE TO [actually] REPRESENT HIMSELF [in the case]... . A defendant choosing self-representation must do so 'COMPETENTLY [this is the key word] AND INTELLEGENTLY'... but we made it clear that THE DEFENDANT'S 'TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE' [as to how actually represent himself in the case] IS 'NOT RELEVANT' TO THE DETERMINATION [as to] WHETHER HE IS COMPETENT TO WAIVE HIS RIGHT TO COUNSEL... . (The immediately preceding text is in the 13th full paragraph at about 30% through the text of the case.).

    Footnote 3: ROD CLASS HAD ALREADY UNDERGONE PREVIOUS SIMILAR, COURT-ORDERED PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATIONS. In the “Judge DALE forgery” entitled, "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America", Rodney "DALE" Class (while pretending to be "Judge DALE") wrote TWO ENTIRE, SEPARATE PARAGRAPHS about HIS OWN many, previous experiences with similar, past, court-ordered PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATIONS and/or HOSPITALIZATIONS. To read these two separate paragraphs, go to page 107 in this link. http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf. Rodney "DALE" Class made a similar admission of his PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS in the “Judge DALE forgery” entitled, “The MATRIX And The US Constitution” (while pretending to be “Judge DALE”) on page 5 in the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph in this link. https://anticorruptionsociety.files....bk-format1.pdf. Class made a similar admission of his PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS in the following radio show, entitled, "Sorry It Has Come To This" (revealing Class' depression and related mental problems) in Episode 917 dated 1-29-15 in this link. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...=5&pageSize=15; http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/...all-sorry.html (scroll down to BOLD RED TYPE at about 10% through the text of the page).

    OTHER AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS WHO EXHIBIT SIMILAR SIGNS OF MENTAL ILLNESS ARE TREATED THE SAME WAY. Amateur legal theorist, Carl Miller (real name "Richard John Champion") has also undergone INVOLUNTARY, COURT-ORDERED PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATIONS AND INVOLUNTARY HOSPITALIZATIONS IN MENTAL INSTITUTIONS. (Documents available on Pacer.gov. which will not allow our links). Likewise, in 2012, a federal court ORDERED amateur legal theorist, Karl Lentz, TO UNDERGO WEEKLY, PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT FOR HIS PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40006. (This text is in at the second half of the 4th full paragraph of this case at about 25% through the text of this case). Other amateur legal theorists have had similar experiences to those of Rod Class, Carl Miller and Karl Lentz. http://privateaudio.homestead.com/__lentz-isms_v2.doc. http://redcatsboards.yuku.com/topic/...n#.WDYUm1KFPIU (at the 3rd complete sentence of the comment). Note that the amateur legal theorist involved in this case is "Lyle Hartford Van Dyke", the REAL author of "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars". Note also that he was convicted and sentenced to prison for effectively writing checks drawn on his imaginary "trust account" at the U.S. Treasury.

    Footnote 4: ABOUT "QUERULOUS PARANOIA", "LITIGIOUS INSANITY", "LITIGIOUS SCHIZOPHRENIA" AND THE "VEXATIOUS LITIGANT": You cannot possibly understand why Rod Class says what he says or does what he does unless you understand the MENTAL ILLNESS described in the following scholarly publication. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...=rep1&type=pdf.

    (HERE, THE AUTHOR PROVIDES A LIST COMMON "ANOMALIES" IN THE "PAPERWORK" OF PEOPLE WITH THIS MENTAL ILLNESS). Look for the following text in this publication:

    a). " ...[Their writings often CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING "ANOMALIES"]... *MANY, MANY pages." (in the 8th full paragraph at about 18% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: http://www.rayservers.com/blog/rod-c...ar-association. Look for the following text in this article: "WE HAD [filed] A 116 PAGE COMPLAINT ["MANY, MANY pages"]... . WE FILED ROUGHLY SEVEN FEET OF DOCUMENTATION ["MANY, MANY pages"].... . THE STACK OF EXHIBITS ["PAGES"] WAS TALLER THAN I CAN STAND ["MANY, MANY pages]." (at about 30% through the text of this page, IN AND/OR NEAR THE UN-HIGHLIGHTED TEXT IN BOLD BLACK PRINT). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40003. Look for the following text in this case: "This [SINGLE Rod Class] motion is comprised of FORTY THREE PAGES ["MANY, MANY PAGES] of block quotes of a variety of statutory provisions that are irrelevant to this case." (at Ruling 10 at about 45% through the text of this case.).

    b). " *ODD OR IRRELEVANT ATTACHMENTS---[OR REFERENCES, LIKE THE]... UN CHARTER ON HUMAN RIGHTS, etc... ." (same list & same place in text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: http://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cri...ourtDenver.pdf. Look for the following text in this document: "UN TREATY, DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS", "LIEBER CODE", "NUREMBERG PROTOCOLS", all "ODD" and "IRRELEVANT" (at the 2nd page marked "3 of 6" in the 2nd to last paragraph below the BOLD subtitle "CHIEF JUDGE ROBERTS"); https://scannedretina.files.wordpres...berts-v-32.pdf. Look for the following text in this document: "UN TREATY, DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS", "LIEBER CODE", "NUREMBERG PROTOCOLS", all "ODD" and "IRRELEVANT" (at page "3 of 5" in the 1st paragraph); https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...n&as_sdt=40003. Look for the following text in this case: "This [SINGLE Rod Class] motion is comprised of forty three pages of block quotes of a variety of statutory provisions THAT ARE IRRELEVANT ["IRRELEVANT"] TO THIS CASE." (at Ruling 10 at about 45% through the text of this case.).

    c). " * REPEATED MISUSE OF LEGAL... TERMS." (same list & same place in text). APPLCATION TO CLASS: https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._18TH_2013.pdf. Look for Class' REPEATED MISUSE OF THE LEGAL TERMS, "Private Attorney General" and "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter" (in the first several paragraphs). Note that Class also REPEATEDLY MISUSES THE LEGAL TERMS, "Corpus Delicti" (which Class mistakenly believes is an injured party), "Judicial Notice" (which Class mistakenly believes involves routing a document to the judge's office so he/she will "notice" it) and hundreds of other LEGAL TERMS.

    d). " * Referring to self in the third person." (same list & same place in text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._18TH_2013.pdf. Look for the THIRD PERSON term, "THIS PAG" in this text (in almost every paragraph beginning at about 35%-70% through the text of this page.).
    ...

    e). " * Ultimatums" (same list & same place in text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/252878427-chief-judge-roberts-v-32.pdf; http://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cri...ourtDenver.pdf. Note that Rod Class directed EACH ONE of these TWO ULTIMATUMS to DIFFERENT TARGETS. Note that writing and sending these two is letters constituted TWO FEDERAL FELONIES. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threat..._United_States (scroll down to "Judges" at about 50% through the text of the article).

    f). " *THREATS OF VIOLENCE DIRECTED AT INDIVIDUALS or organizations" (same list & same place in text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://scannedretina.files.wordpres...berts-v-32.pdf. Look for the following text in this threatening letter: "The giant is awakening. What happens to you then? (See the final 3 paragraphs AND THE FINAL SENTENCE to that letter.). http://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cri...ourtDenver.pdf. Look for the following text in this threatening letter. "The giant is awakening. What happens to you then?" (See the whole letter, but pay special attention to pages 4-5). Note that Rod Class directed EACH ONE of these TWO THREATS to DIFFERENT VICTIMS. Note that writing and sending these two threatening letters constituted TWO FEDERAL FELONIES. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threat..._United_States (scroll down to "Judges" at about 50% through the text of the article). Note also that Rod Class has actually been caught carrying around in his car a fully-loaded, illegally sawed-off Springfield shotgun (to increase its deadly effect), night sticks with concealed razor blades (to increase their deadly effect), one fully-loaded rifle, three fully-loaded handguns (one of which was illegally unsecured and positioned between the front seats for quick and easy access), several hundred rounds of ammunition for all firearms onboard, one machete in the driver's side door for quick and easy access), fourteen knives and daggers of varying size and lethal effect, one completely illegal switchblade, three more axes of varying size and lethal effect, packages of concealed razor blades under his clothing when frisked, etc. Note also that due to Rod Class' well-publicized HATRED of the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and our Republican form of government, his long CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS and long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS, Rod Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST!

    (THE AUTHOR'S LIST OF "PAPERWORK" "ANOMALIES" ENDS HERE. THE ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE.)

    g). "[Victims of this mental illness] DEMAND... PUBLIC RECOGNITION not only of the justice of their [own] claims BUT THEIR STRUGGLE ON BEHALF OF THE RIGHTS OF ALL." (in the 9th full paragraph at about 25% through the text); APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://newearth.media/private-attor...s-on-the-itnj/. Look for the following phrase in this article: "Rod Class... WAS ACTING ON BEHALF OF ALL U.S. Citizens ["RIGHTS OF ALL"]." (at the 1st full sentence); http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf. Look for the following phrase in this article: "Mr. Class WAS ACTING... ON BEHALF OF ALL PEOPLE ["RIGHTS OF ALL"]... ." (at 2nd page in 2nd paragraph); https://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com...-traffic-case/. Look for the following phrase in this article: "Mr. Class WAS ACTING... ON BEHALF OF ALL PEOPLE ["RIGHTS OF ALL"]... ." (at 6th full paragraph at about 8% through the text of the page); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Cgaz8vo60 (whole video, Class, pretending to struggle for the "RIGHTS OF ALL"); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnWWdFktV8Q&t=52s (whole video, Class, pretending to struggle for the "RIGHTS OF ALL"); www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7DicAWY4P4&t=80s (at 1:15, Class, pretending to struggle for the "RIGHTS OF ALL");

    h). "They... see themselves as CHAMPIONS OF THE COMMON MAN"... (in the 9th full paragraph at about 25% through the text); APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://scannedretina.com/2015/05/27...itnj-launch-2/. Look for the term, "JUSTICE FOR THE COMMON MAN" (in the TITLE),

    (continued) ...whose [own] grievances... [HAVE] BECOME OF NATIONAL, OR EVEN INTERNATIONAL, IMPORT (same paragraph & same place in text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: http://empower2inspire.com/rod-class....p1WFoNdU.dpbs. Look for the phrase, "WORLD-WIDE ATTENTION ["INTERNATIONAL IMPORT]" (in 2nd sentence); https://myslide.es/documents/sigmifi...-gun-case.html. Look for the following phrase: "Why the Rod Class D.C. gun case lays the foundation for the INTERNATIONAL ["INTERNATIONAL IMPORT"] TRIBUNAL FOR NATURAL JUSTICE... ." (in the 1st sentence); https://ascendingstarseed.wordpress.com/tag/rod-class/ (Class, mistakenly believing his own grievance has become a matter of "NATIONAL" or "INTERNATIONAL IMPORT"); https://higherdensity.wordpress.com/...new-realities/ (in the 2nd paragraph, Class, mistakenly believing his own grievance has become a matter of "NATIONAL" or "INTERNATIONAL IMPORT").

    i). "...[They] OFTEN APPEAR AS UNREPRESENTED LITIGANTS... BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE THAT NOBODY ELSE CAN BE TRUSTED TO ADEQUATELY PRESENT THEIR CASE [their delusional, amateur legal theories]." (in the 10th full paragraph at about 25% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: Except for the case now before the U.S. Supreme Court, Class always purports to represent himself.

    j). "[MANY REGARD THEMSELVES] AS... WHISTLE BLOWER[S]... " (in the 13th full paragraph at about 35% though the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: "The FBI/CIA told me [that in terms of global importance,] they put me right up there with Ed Snowden AS A WHISTLEBLOWER." (from Class' radio show); http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2012/...turned_22.html (scroll down to about 10% through the text of the page to the BOLD RED TYPE to where Rodney "DALE" Class pretends to be "Judge DALE" and DESCRIBES HIMSELF as a "WHISTLEBLOWER"); https://livingintheprivate.blogspot....-in-court.html (scroll down to at about 50% through the text and look immediately above the link in BLUE TYPE to where Rodney "DALE" Cass pretends to be "Judge DALE" and DESCRIBES HIMSELF as a "WHISTLEBLOWER"); http://in5d.com/anonymous-judge-blow...le-are-slaves/ (Rodney "DALE" Class pretends to be an "ANNONYMOUS JUDGE" and DESCRIBES HIMSELF as a "WHISTLEBLOWER").

    (continued) '...WHO WOULD BE PUBLICALLY RECOGNIZED AS ONE OF THE MAJOR SOCIAL REFORMERS OF HIS GENERATION." (same paragraph & same place in text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: http://www.gatheringspot.net/video/g...m-movement-now (Class, pretending to be one of the "MAJOR SOCIAL REFORMERS OF HIS GENERATION"); https://itnjcommittee.org/projects/contribute/; (a "SOCIAL REFORM" group with which Class is affiliated pretends to operate an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE GLOBAL LEGAL SYSTEM); https://www.itnj.org/ (Scroll down to "MISSION" for the goals of this "SOCIAL REFORM" group with which Class is affiliated); https://newearthnation.org/ (another "SOCIAL REFORM" group with which Class is affiliated); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-AQ...0GGOIepbMeJoDX (another "SOCIAL REFORM" group with which Class is affiliated); https://globalfreedommovement.org/about/ (another "SOCIAL REFORM" group with which Class is affiliated).

    k). "THE MENTAL STATE of these individuals... IS DOMINATED BY THEIR... UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS... [in] THE WIDE SOCIAL IMPORT OF THEIR PURSUIT... "(in the 14th full paragraph at about 35% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22R...w=1366&bih=651

    (continued) "...AND [in] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT [means "EVILNESS"] OPPOSITION THEY FACE... . (same paragraph and same place in text). APPLICATION TO CLASS:
    https://globalfreedommovement.org/ex...ith-rod-class/ (reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/ (an article actually written by Class reflecting his "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.co...of-government/ (an article actually written by Class reflecting his "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/geno...pon-americans/ (at 2nd paragraph is text actually written by Class reflecting his "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    http://www.akupressllc.com/150121Cri...ourtDenver.pdf (at 50% through the text of the page reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    https://www.scribd.com/document/2404...andum-Based-On (reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    https://www.nationallibertyalliance....vs-natural-law (reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=3593s (at 43:50-44:55, Rod Class' chief partner in the "Judge DALE Hoax" pretends to quote "Judge DALE" reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/ta...ey-dale-class/ (reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/...p?q=1350315108 (reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    https://itnjcommittee.org/wp-content...61-6-17-14.pdf (reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES");
    http://houseofpraani.com/portfolio/itnj/ (at the 2nd paragraph (reflecting Class' "UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS [IN] THE ORGANIZED AND MALEVOLENT OPPOSITION ...[HE] FACES").

    (continued) "...Many of these individuals HAVE A PLAUSIBILITY AND EVEN INFECTIOUS ENTHUSIASM. They PRESENT THEIR GRIEVANCES... WITH SUPERFICIAL RATIONALITY. THIS CAN DISTRACT THE INEXPERIENCED [person, like his partners in the "Judge DALE Hoax' and his partners in the ITNL, NEN and AIS ] from the... [REALITY that what they actually say IS DELUSIONAL]." (same paragraph & same place in text).

    l). "The central feature clinically is their complete focus on their quest... to which all else is subordinated [means "ignored"]. By the time they reach our clinic THEY HAVE USUALLY LAID WASTE TO THE FINANCIAL AND SOCIAL FABRIC OF THEIR LIVES.... . At issue is no longer just money and esteem BUT THEIR VERY EXISTENCE [their life]." (in the 16th full paragraph at about 35% through the text)

    m). "[With respect to these individuals, there are always] GROSS DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE INITIATING CAUSE AND THE... LEVEL OF COMMITMENT, AND EXPECTATIONS FOR COMPENSATION, REPARATION, [and] RETRIBUTION." (in the 16th full paragraph at about 38% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: Class is caught "CARRYING" in his car "DANGEROUS WEAPONS" onto United States Capitol grounds and agrees to a plea deal wherein he actually walked out of court a "free man" without even so much as probation (the "INITIATING CAUSE"). But, later Class changes his mind and spends the next 5 years of his life fighting and appealing HIS OWN plea deal, despite that he actually walked out of court a "free man" without even so much as probation (A "GROSS DISCREPANCY" BETWEEN THE INITIATING CAUSE AND THE... LEVEL OF COMMITMENT, AND EXPECTATIONS FOR COMPENSATION, REPARATION, [and] RETRIBUTION).

    (continued) "...The ENTHUSIASM [they show for their cause]... CAN OBSCURE [from onlookers, like his partners in the "Judge DALE Hoax", the ITNJ, NEN and AIS] THE ESSENTIAL ABSURDITY [read this phrase again] of these expectations and DISTRACT ATTENTION FROM [THE REALITY OF] THE CHAOS THE PURSUIT HAS CREATED FOR THEMSELVES AND THOSE AROUND THEM." (same paragraph & same place in text)

    n). "Querulousness... involves... A TOTALLY DISPROPORTIONATE INVESTMENT OF TIME AND RESOURCES in grievances THAT GROW STEADILY FROM THE MUNDANE [means "dull"] TO THE GRANDIOS (in the 19th full paragraph at about 47% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22R...0&bih=750(note "THE GRANDIOSE")

    (continued)... and whose settlement REQUIRES... PERSONAL VINDICATION."

    o). "Querulous behavior IS ALMOST ALWAYS ASSOCIATED WITH CLAIMS OF WIDE SOCIAL IMPORTANCE... ." (in the 20th full paragraph at about 47% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://newearth.media/private-attor...s-on-the-itnj/. Look for the following text in this article: "Rod Class, the notorious Private Attorney General, HAS ACTED ON BEHALF OF ALL U.S. CITIZENS ["WIDE SOCIAL IMPORTANCE"]." (in the 1st sentence.); http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf. Look for the following language in this article: "Mr. Class WAS ACTING as a Private Attorney General... ON BEHALF OF ALL PEOPLE... similarly situated ["WIDE SOCIAL IMPORTANCE"]." (at page 2 in 2nd paragraph); https://www.itnj.org/ (scroll down to "MISSION"); http://www.rayservers.com/blog/rod-c...-record-update ("WIDE SOCIAL IMPORTANCE").

    p). "[Those with this mental illness]... OCCASIONALLY GATHER AROUND THEM SMALL GROUPS OF LIKE MINDED SUPPORTERS, A PROCESS NOW ASSISTED BY THE INTERNET." (in the 22nd paragraph at about 50% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS:
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b8uc33rrk...ower_right.jpg;
    https://rodclassfans.wordpress.com/;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7-9qh5gB1s&t=1597s;
    http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...=48361&cmd=tc;;

    q). "... [Those with this mental illness] are usually social isolates OR INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE CLOAKED THEMSELVES [means "they pretend to be a person of"]... INTELLECTUAL SUPERIORITY. " (in the 24th full paragraph at about 55% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: SEE PHOTOS below showing that Class pretends to be a person of "INTELLECTUAL SUPERIORITY".
    https://rodclassfans.wordpress.com/ (pretending to be a person who is "INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR")
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQDBRq-6FNk&t=3472s (pretending to be a person who is "INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR")
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQwFK9AXzJg (pretending to be a person who is "INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR")
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqXDrax5_KI (pretending to be a person who is "INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR")
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikCMaCF4T8Y&t=4373s (pretending to be a person who is "INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR")
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-DJlZp9GN4&t=4403s (pretending to be a person who is "INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR")
    https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/...od-class-case/ (at first sentence, Class pretends to be a person who is "INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR")

    r). "As time passes the [person with this mental illness] BECOMES MORE... CONVINCED OF THE WIDER SIGNIFICANCE OF THE QUEST. ...SOME...BEGIN TO CONSTRUCT NOTIONS OF ... GRANDIOSE DESTINY [like becoming PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES]." (in paragraph 31 at about 61% through the text). APPLICATION TO CLASS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUWOiTtDHqg&t=1332s (Rod Class' "CONSTRUCTED NOTION" of "GRANDIOSE DESTINY"); https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...ass-flyer2.pdf (Rod Class' "CONSTRUCTED NOTION" of "GRANDIOSE DESTINY").

    s). "Querulous Paranoia"... "PARANOID MEANS NOT SUSPICIOUSNESS but [means] SUFFERING FROM PARANOIA, AND IMPLIES THE PRESENCE OF DELUSIONS. (in the 33rd paragraph at about 66% through the text).

    OTHER SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS ON THIS MENTAL ILLNESS:
    http://www.coatconference.com.au/res...nts_2017_6.pdf (listing the symptoms from which Class suffers)
    http://jaapl.org/content/45/1/62 (See list of symptoms in 5th, 6th & 7th full paragraphs in page 2 beginning at about 15% through the text. Note the symptom, "NOT DETERRED BY REPEATED NEGATIVE OUTCOMES", such as LOSING 73 CONSECUTIVE CASES IN A ROW.).
    http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/...6/ajp.59.2.279
    http://www.nicolastato.com.ar/esp/in...sofia&Itemid=8
    http://judicialmadness.bitballoon.co...tem/index.html
    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/1...061-0405020251
    http://www.wtsglobal.com/the-vexatious-litigant/
    http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/184/4/352
    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=5483226&page=1
    https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/im...ant_Lester.pdf

    ROD CLASS HAS ALREADY BEEN "JUDICIALLY DECLARED" a "VEXATIOUS LITIGANT" WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE FOREGOING PSYCHIATRIC LITERATURE.
    The judge made this judicial declaration in Class v. Gwin [the judge in a case that Class had just LOST] et al. [means "and others", including 30 governmental officials], Case No. 5:06-CV-1465, U. S. Dist. Ct. N.D. Ohio (Akron). Filed 06-14-06. Dismissed (means THROWN OUT OF COURT) 07-25-06. (available on pacer.gov.).

    IN THE LINKS BELOW, ROD CLASS SOLICITS OTHER AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS WITH THE SAME DELUSIONS TO HELP HIM CARRY OUT A MISSION THAT IS THE DIRECT RESULT OF THE PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS DESCRIBED IN THE PSYCHIATRIC LITERATURE ABOVE.
    http://www.topix.com/forum/city/arch...PLIDASAV6NENR8 (at the 1st comment)
    http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2011/...ri-dec-16.html (Scroll down to about 50% through the text of the page)

    THE TAKE AWAY:
    All of this means that the key source of information about the law for thousands of people is a source that is mentally ill. All of this means that every single person who mindlessly "parrots" terms coined by Rod Class ("B.A.R. lawyer"; "Corporate Government", etc.) are not only "parroting" a source who is illiterate, uneducated, ignorant of the law and a pathological liar ("mendacious"), they are also "parroting" a source who is mentally ill.

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 13th March 2018 at 11:35. Reason: fixed bad link

  5. Link to Post #5
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 5: PART I: THE “BOMBSHELL: ROD CLASS HAS OBTAINED HIS FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE RULING THAT ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE ‘PRIVATE ENTITIES’ OR ‘PRIVATE CONTRACTORS’ HOAX” (A.K.A. “THE BOMBSHELL: FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE RULING HOAX”)

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    VIDEO
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk LISTEN FOR THE FOLLOWING FRAUDULENT CLAIMS IN THIS VIDEO. (NOTE CLASS' FRAUDULENT USE OF PLURAL TERMS, SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO THIS HOAX.). "When THEY came in and THEY declared THEIRSELVES (sic) to be PRIVATE entitIES out of the administrative court [an event that NEVER occurred], and the attorney general’s office had put in (sic) that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [an event that NEVER occurred], and the city law director [said] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [an event that NEVER occurred], that means that these POLICE OFFICERS out here in the road ARE PRIVATE contractorS [something that is not so]. THEY are NOT classified as PUBLIC officialS when THEY drag you into THEIR standard court in your community. Because the judge will sit here [and say] this is an upstanding public office. THESE are public officialS. Well, the administrative court says, "no THEY are not." THEY are a private contractor (sic). Now, we got a conflict." (at 7:10-8:00) "The court has classified THEM as PRIVATE contractorS. THEY are NOT PART OF THE STATE. This opens up a big law suit across this country." (at 8:20-8:35) "So, you have an administrative court coming in and defining THESE PEOPLE as PRIVATE contractorS, NON-PUBLIC officialS [an event that NEVER occurred]. Now, when THEY are classifying the Department Of Transportation as a NON-PUBLIC OFFICE [an event that NEVER occurred] the tag agency as a NON-PUBLIC OFFICE, then that means THEY are running EVERY SINGLE AGENCY through that state AS A PRIVATE CONTRACT SET UP, NON-PUBLIC officialS. Some of you are not aware, back in 2006 that there was a class action lawsuit against the court system [which Class LOST and which was THROWN OUT of district court and THROWN OUT of the court of appeals]. The 10th Circuit [Court of Appeals] ruled [when THROWING the case OUT of court] that ALL OF THESE public officialS were CORPORATE APPELLEES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. THEY belong to the CORPORATION. THEY were NOT PUBLIC officialS. Therefore, the court cannot hold THEM to [a] violation of THEIR oath of office because THEY are NOT PUBLIC OFFICIALS... . THEY are sitting here saying, ‘THESE are NOT PUBLIC officerS. THEY are NOT PUBLIC officialS. But, THEY hold positionS as PRIVATE contractorS and therefore the administrative court has no subject matter jurisdiction over private PEOPLE.' They would only have it over PUBLIC OFFICIALS." (at 9:00-10:50) "Right now, I'm sitting on three documents. I'm sitting on the 10th Circuit [dismissal THROWING the case OUT of court] that admitted that these PEOPLE are CORPORATE APPELLEES [an admission that NEVER occurred]. We're sitting on the paperwork from this administrative court from this law judge sitting here saying that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS or PRIVATE entitIES [something the law judge did not say]. We're sitting on the paperwork from the attorney general’s office and the city law director sitting here saying THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something the paperwork does not say]. THEY are NON-PUBLIC officialS. ... . I’ve got another case where another administrative law judge has come back in and again has stated that THE POLICE DEPARTMENT- that these PEOPLE are NOT PUBLIC officialS. They are PRIVATE contractorS. THEY don’t work for the state." (at 25:00-25:35) "I got three hearings where it is confirmed [that] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS. We got three hearings. We’ve got an administrative judge saying THEY are PRIVATE entitIES. NON-PUBLIC officialS. (at 36:40-37:00) "The fact that THEY are admitting that police officers are PRIVATE contractorS [something NEVER admitted to]... . THEY are classified as PRIVATE contractorS." (at 43:00-43:25) "Your honor. It is a proven fact that that police officer is NOT A PUBLIC OFFICIAL. It is a proven fact his is a PRIVATE CONTRACTOR. And, he cannot use the state to come into this court room and, he has NO AUTHORITY. As a PRIVATE CONTRACTOR, he only has jurisdiction over those that hire him and I did not hire this man. He has NO AUTHORITY over me." (at 50:35-51:05) "We got the 10th Circuit ruling [THROWING the case OUT of court which said] that THEY are CORPORATE APPELLEES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. We got the administrative hearing out of North Carolina that THEY are PRIVATE entitIES [a ruling that NEVER occurred]. We got the paperwork form the attorney general’s office [that] THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something paperwork does not say]. We got the paperwork from the city law director that THEY are PRIVATE contractorS [something paperwork does not say]." (at 53:05-53-20)

    FAKE PRESS RELEASES
    https://tatoott1009.wordpress.com/20...e-contractors/
    http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/...p?q=1350315108;
    https://sherayx.wordpress.com/2013/0...e-contractors/;
    http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.co...tractors/23602.
    http://abundanthope.net/pages/True_U...tractors.shtml;
    https://www.scribd.com/document/1828...ublic-Notice-P;
    http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/WE-ARE-C...ages/43090012/;
    https://www.meetup.com/es-ES/StLouis...ages/25275652/;
    http://gold-silver.us/forum/archive/...p/t-64278.html;
    http://nesaranews.blogspot.ca/search...-paginate=true (scroll down to 2nd article at about 15% through the text of the page);
    https://peoplestrustmilwaukee.wordpr...013/02/03/364/ (at the 4th full paragraph);.
    https://keystoliberty.wordpress.com/...em-fraudulent/ (at the 5th full paragraph);
    https://scannedretina.com/2012/10/15...es-are-vacant/;
    https://bbsradio.com/cgi-bin/webbbs/...=read;id=27745;
    https://newearth.media/private-attor...s-on-the-itnj/ (at the 1st full sentence).

    SIDE NOTE:
    NOTE THAT THE VERY FIRST WORD IN THE TITLE OF THIS HOAX IS THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "BOMBSHELL" (SEE LINKS DIRECTLY ABOVE). THIS IS SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE JUDGE "DALE", RODNEY "DALE" CLASS AND HIS TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS ALL JUST HAPPEN TO ALL USE THE SAME, SHARED, COMMON, UNIQUE, "SIGNATURE" TERMS IN THE WORDING OF THEIR HOAXES, AN AMAZING COINCIDENCE. IN THIS PARTICULAR HOAX, THEY USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "BOMBSHELL". IN OTHER HOAXES, THEY USE THE "SIGNATURE" TERM, "MATRIX" (see comment 3 above) ). BELOW ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF OTHER "BOMBSHELL" HOAXES BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER IN THE JUDGE "DALE" HOAX AND IN THIS VERY HOAX BEING EXPOSED HERE:
    http://www.leclife.com/index.php?ale...orah%20Tavares
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIIw5xhG5Ho.
    http://legacy.staged.com/video?v=ROIh.
    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...s-2978738.html.
    http://meetnigerians.net/members/vid...hoTszlL_G6tQ6Q.
    http://trclip.com/video/LIIw5xhG5Ho/...h-tavares.html
    http://mp3yts.com/mp3/red-pill-repor...h-tavares.html (Scroll down to the 30th video at about 60-65% down the page).
    http://www.mp3xd-com.com/bajar-mp3/b...eborah-tavares.

    SIDE NOTE:
    In the following videos, Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS put their own deceptive spin on this SAME BASIC HOAX (that all federal and state governments and all of their agencies are PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS). YOU MUST SEE THE VIDEOS BELOW! Note that NONE of the private, for-profit corporations referred to in any of the following videos HAVE ANY CONNECTION WHATSOEVER TO ANY FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT OR AGENCY. Instead, they are all ordinary, private, for-profit corporations with names that SOUND SIMILAR to governments or government agencies (like "Federal Express", for example). This means that contrary to the claims of Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS, the ordinary, private, for-profit corporation named the "United States Corporation Company" (referred to at 2:00-3:10 in the FIRST video below) IS NOT actually the government of the "United States of America". http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...ATES%201000090 (Scroll all the way down to the very bottom of this link and click on the FINAL document. Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS refer this document later in the FIRST video below.). Instead, the "United States Corporation Company" is merely a "registered agent" which accepts "service of process" (civil lawsuits) for other corporations doing business in Florida and is actually listed as such by the Florida Secretary of State, Division of Corporations. http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Cor...0Company/Page1 (BE SURE TO SCROLL THROUGH ALL OF THE PAGES IN THIS LINK). (Note: Every corporation doing business in the state is required to have a "registered agent" inside the state to accept "service of process" (civil lawsuits) on its behalf. The "United States Corporation Company" is merely an ordinary, private, for-profit company provides that service to other such corporations (which are often out-of-state corporations that do not have an office in the state) for a fee. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/...0607.0505.html.). Further, at 4:30-4:45 in the FIRST video below, Rod Class' TWO CHARLATAN PARTNERS also FRAUDULENTLY CHANGE THE NAME of one such ordinary, private, for-profit corporation TO MAKE IT SOUND EVEN MORE LIKE A GOVERNMENT AGENCY in order to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. Specifically, they "SWITCH" the name, "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc." (THE REAL NAME) with the name, "Internal Revenue Service" (THE FAKE NAME) in order to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. This is precisely the reason that they do not show an ACTUAL PHOTO of this particular corporation's "corporate charter" in their video as they do with other "corporate charters" of the other corporations referred to in their video (BECAUSE IT WOULD SHOW THE CORPORATION'S "REAL NAME" WHICH WOULD EXPOSE THEIR FRAUD). See the truth about this particular fraud here. https://www.dropbox.com/s/04tmhmd08w...0Inc..pdf?dl=0 (Note that this ordinary, private, for-profit corporation, the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc.", WAS INCORPORATED IN DELAWARE.); http://www.hovindology.com/?p=80 (THIS LINK IS EXCELLENT. READ IT ALL.).

    VIDEOS BY ROD CLASS' CHARLATAN PARTNERS PEDDLING THIS SAME BASIC HOAX:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (See the WHOLE VIDEO, but be especially certain to listen at 2:00-3:10 (for the "United States Corporation Company Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:30-4:45 (for the "Internal Revenue Tax And Audit Service, Inc. Hoax" EXPOSED ABOVE), 4:45-4:55, 5:55-6:10, 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 9:05-9:45, 22:00-22:50, 24:10-24:25, 25:55-26:45.);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05o4CpB9I8g&t=260s (at 2:25-4:00, 5:25-6:15, 6:40-7:30, 7:55-8:50);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (at 42:10-42:35, 47:50--49:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (at 43:15-43:50, 52:30-53:00).

    THE HOAX:
    Rod Class falsely claims that he obtained “FOUR” “administrative rulings” to the effect that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractors”. But, this claim in not so.

    THE TRUTH:
    Rod Class NEVER obtained even one single ruling to that effect, much less “FOUR” of them.

    HOAX SIMPLIFIED:
    This HOAX arose out of TWO cases that Class LOST (and the LOSS of the appeals of BOTH of those two LOSSES). In BOTH of these two cases, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. Like all of the cases that Class files, he LOST these two cases too. In their DISMISSALS of these two cases (throwing them out of court), the judges in BOTH OF THESE TWO CASES referred to the private corporations that Class had sued and to the government agencies that Class had sued SEPARATELY (one ruling DISMISSING the government agencies that Class had sued and a different ruling DISMISSING the private corporations that Class had sued). But, in trying to explain away these two LOSSES to his followers, Class fraudulently “SWITCHED” the judges’ words about the private corporations that Class had sued with the judges’ words about the government agencies that Class had sued. By “SWITCHING” the judges’ words about the private corporations with the judges’ words about the government agencies, Class fraudulently created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually talking about the private corporations, they were instead talking about all of the government agencies. This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judges words (from one group of defendants TO THE OTHER group of defendants) created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually referring to THE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS that Class had sued as “corporate appellees” or as a SINGLE “private entitY” as applicable, they were instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class had sued as “corporate appelleeS” or as “private entitIES”, as applicable. But, that was not so.

    THE TRUTH IN THE FIRST CASE (The 10th Circuit LOSS):
    In this case, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. In his DISMISSAL of the first case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the term, “Corporate Appellees”, when referring BY NAME (ONLY) to a private bank and to two private insurance companies that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL of this case (throwing it out of court), the judge was instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" that Class had sued as “corporate appellees”. In the link below, scroll down to the BOLD, BLACK TYPE in the YELLOW-HIGHLIGHTED PARAGRAPH at about 35-40% through the text of this page. LOOK FOR THE TERM, "10th Circuit" IN BOLD TYPE. http://www.rayservers.com/blog/rod-c...ar-association (Remember, the BOLD, BLACK TYPE in the YELLOW-HIGHLIGHTED PARAGRAPH at about 35-40% through the text of this page and look for the term, "10th Circuit" IN BOLD TYPE). In the video below, listen to 9:35-10:50, 25:05-25:35, 43:00-44:10, 53:00-53:20. LISTEN FOR THE TERM, "10th Circuit". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, 9:35-10:50, 25:05-25:35, 43:40-44:10, 53:00-53:20 and listen for the term, "10th Circuit"). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s words (from one type of defendant TO THE OTHER type of defendant) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" were “corporate appellees”. Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this 10th Circuit DISMISSAL (throwing the case out of court) can be found here. In the link below, scroll down to page 6 at lines 13-15. Look for the following phrase, "Appellees Westfield Insurance Company, CNA Surety, and First National Bank ("Corporate Appellees") have filed a separate motion... ." https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOUR...07-05026-0.pdf (Remember, page 6 at lines 13-15 and identify which defendants the court REALLY refers to as "corporate appellees"). After reading what the judge in this case actually said, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class sued as “corporate appellees” OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer BY NAME (ONLY) to the private bank and the two private insurance companies that Class used as “corporate appellees"?

    THE TRUTH IN THE SECOND CASE (The North Carolina Administrative Court LOSS):
    In this case, Class sued a STATE-WIDE government "agency", a “LOCAL unit of government” and a SINGLE “private entitY”, ALL IN THE SAME CASE. Specifically, Class filed an administrative suit against the North Carolina Department of Transportation (a STATE-WIDE government "agency" which was immune from suit by statute), against a “LOCAL” city police department (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a "LOCAL" “UNIT OF GOVERNMENT", rather than a STATE-WIDE "agency" under the Governor) and against a SINGLE private contractor that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a SINGLE “private entitY”). In his DISMISSAL of this second case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the SINGULAR term, “private entitY” when referring BY NAME (ONLY) to that SINGLE “private entitY” that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL of the case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the PLURAL term, “private entitIES” and fraudulently told his followers that the judge was instead referring to ALL THREE DEFENDANTS that Class had sued as “private entitIES” (including the LOCAL city police department). In the link below, read the 2nd, 3rd and FINAL paragraphs. LOOK FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERM, "entitIES" in that text. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf (Remember, the 2nd, 3rd and FINAL paragraphs and LOOK FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERM, "entitIES" in that text). In the video below, listen to 9:00-9:15, 25:15-25:35, 53:05-53:20. LISTEN FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERMS, "entitIES" and "contractorS" in the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, 9:00-9:15, 25:15-25:35, 53:05-53:20 and LISTEN FOR THE FRAUDULENT (PLURAL) TERMS, "entitIES" and "contractorS" in the video.). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s actual word, “entitY” (a SINGULAR term) to the FRAUDULENT word, “entitIES” (a PLURAL term) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled "ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES" (including the LOCAL city police department) were “private entitIES” (a PLURAL term that does not appear anywhere in the DISMISSAL). Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this North Carolina Administrative Court DISMISSAL (throwing the case out of court) can be found here. In the link below, scroll down to the document entitled “Conclusions Of Law” to the text actually numbered paragraph "4" and read the SECOND sentence of that 4th paragraph. Look for the following phrase, "[The] Respondent License Plate Agency [ONLY]... is a private entitY [A SINGULAR TERM]... [and not an agency of] state government." https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre...y_complete.pdf (Remember, "Conclusions Of Law" in the text actually numbered paragraph "4" in the SECOND sentence of that 4th paragraph and look for the SINGULAR term, "entitY"). After reading what the judge in this case actually said in this case, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL THREE DEFENDANTS” (including the LOCAL city police department) as “private entitIES”, a PLURAL term OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer BY NAME (ONLY) to the SINGLE private contractor that sold license plates for the State of North Carolina as a SINGLE “private entitY”, a SINGULAR term?

    In fairness to Class, who only has a high school education and who is functionally illiterate, CLASS MISTAKENLY BELIEVED THAT HE HAD SUED THREE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES in this case. That is why he sued all three defendants in state administrative court. (He mistakenly believed that all three defendants were state-wide government "agencies" under the governor over which state administrative courts usually have jurisdiction.). But, in fact in this case, Class had actually sued ONLY TWO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (OR “UNITS”) and a SINGLE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina. Class mistakenly believed that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he had mistakenly sued in this case was a government agency because he did not know that FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA HAS USED PRIVATE CONTRACTORS TO SELL VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES TO NORTH CAROLINA VEHICLE OWNERS.

    If Class had bothered to do a little research before filing suit, he would have discovered that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) was a not a governmental agency at all. Unknown to Class, almost all of the vehicle license plate agencies in the State Of North Carolina (outside the Charlotte & Raleigh areas) are now owned and operated by private contractors of the type that he mistakenly sued in this case (in the mistaken belief that it was a government "agency"). But, despite that the State of North Carolina uses private contractors to sell its vehicle license plates, IT DOES NOT USE PRIVATE CONTRACTORS FOR ITS LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY-TYPE FUNCTION. It only uses private contractors to sell vehicle license plates (includes titling services). This has been PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE to everyone except Rod Class for over half a century.

    WHAT CLASS DID NOT KNOW THEN (AND DOES NOT KNOW NOW):

    http://www.ncleg.net/ped/reports/doc...ags_report.pdf (Scroll down to "BACKGROUND" on the 4th page, marked "page 2").

    https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/...s.aspx?r=10646

    http://www.wral.com/dmv-defends-syst...ices/11753455/

    http://myfox8.com/2015/01/15/dmv-see...stokes-county/

    http://www.journalnow.com/news/local...a4bcf6878.html

    CLASS MAKES MISTAKES ON TOP OF MISTAKES: So, not knowing any better, when the judge in this case DISMISSED (threw out) Class' lawsuit against this SINGLE private contractor on the grounds that it was a SINGLE "private entitY" (and not a STATE-WIDE government "agency" over which the administrative court usually has jurisdiction), Class mistakenly believed he had "forced" the courts to "admit" that a SINGLE "private entitY" was a SINGLE "private entitY" (something that everybody except Class has known for over half a century). This means that Class' own IGNORANCE (of the fact that North Carolina has used private contractors to sell vehicle license plates for more than half a century) led to him reach the mistaken conclusion that he had miraculously become a "legal genius". To this very day, Class does not know that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) had actually been a SINGLE "private entitY" all along. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

    CLOSING NOTE:
    Remember, Class falsely claims to have obtained “FOUR” ADMINISTRATIVE rulings to the effect “all government agencies” (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractorS”. Here is how Class reaches the IMAGINARY total of "FOUR" such IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE rulings to that effect. According to Class, his two DISMISSALS (his two LOSSES) described above (throwing his two cases out of court) constituted TWO such IMAGINARY rulings to that effect (one of which was NOT an “ADMINISTRATIVE” ruling in the first place, the 10th Circuit DISMISSAL). According to Class, the ruling AGAINST HIM in his LOSS of his APPEAL of his DISMISSAL (LOSS) of the second case (described above) constituted the THIRD such IMAGINARY ruling to that effect (which was likewise NOT an ADMINISTRATIVE ruling either, it was a JUDICIAL ruling as well). (Class' LOSS of his APPEAL of his LOSS of the second case (above) is referred to in the 3rd paragraph in this link. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf (Remember, the 3rd paragraph here.)). Finally, according to Class, an ordinary “MOTION To Dismiss” filed by the state Attorney General’s Office in this second case (above) constituted the “FOURTH” such IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE ruling to that effect (which was NOT A RULING OF ANY KIND, ADMINISTRATIVE or JUDICIAL). (In this "MOTION to Dismiss", the Assistant Attorney General, among other things, simply reminded the judge that Class has MISTAKENLY sued a private contractor that sold license plates for North Carolina in administrative court because he MISTAKENLY believed it was a government agency. The judge agreed and DISMISSED (threw out) Class' case and that court's DISMISSAL of the case was upheld on appeal.). In the video below, listen at 53:00-53:20 for Class' "LIST" of these IMAGINARY rulings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do3eTH-NtSk (Remember, at 53:00-53:20). (Note that contrary to Class' claims in this video, the city law director never claimed that the city police department was a "private contractor". Instead, the city law director actually said that the LOCAL city police department was not STATE-WIDE "agency" under the Governor and, therefore, the administrative court had no jurisdiction over it.). This means that of these "FOUR" IMAGINARY ADMINISTRATIVE rulings (allegedly to the effect that all government agencies are "private entitIES"), CLASS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE and only ONE such LOSS (a DISMISSAL) was an "ADMINISTRATIVE" DISMISSAL (or "ruling") in the first place. This "FUZZY MATH" is how Class reaches the FRAUDULENT total of “FOUR” IMAGINARY "ADMINISTRATIVE rulings" to the effect that “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" (including all law enforcement agencies) are “private entitIES” or “private contractorS”.

    (CONTINUED BELOW)

    PART II: ROD CLASS & THE “A NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE HAS WARNED STATE POLICE OFFICERS TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES HOAX”

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    http://hiddensecretsandlies.blogspot...police-to.html
    http://www.gloucestercounty-va.com/2...iable-for.html (at the 1st full paragraph);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZe9-QDsqG4 (note the title of the video and the misspelled word therein);
    https://adask.wordpress.com/2011/10/...ne-elses-name/.
    http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf
    https://www.meetup.com/es-ES/StLouis...ages/25275652/ (at the 2nd full paragraph);
    http://2013rainbowroundtable.ning.co...=06v6zf7ohrnts;
    http://landrightsnfarming-landrightn...7_archive.html;
    http://www.city-data.com/forum/north...-patrol-2.html (at comment 8 at about 65% through the text of the page);
    https://www.godlikeproductions.com/f...age1684911/pg1 (click and enter the website if necessary);
    https://videos.peacefmonline.com/tgy...Vsc2UncyBOYW1l;
    http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...170&viewfull=1 (at 1st several comments)
    http://www.medialyrics.com/Judge-War...ro-rZe9-QDsqG4 (note misspelled word in title);
    http://www.thetreeofliberty.com/vb/s...n-this-be-true (at the 1st full comment);
    http://tuzmp3.download/mp3/judge-war...se-s-name.html.


    THE HOAX:
    This hoax is unique in that Rod Class created it to support another hoax, the “BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”. (Read that comment DIRECTLY ABOVE in this same comment first.). In this particular hoax, Class falsely claims that, IN DIRECT RESPONSE to his having obtained "FOUR" “Administrative Rulings” to the effect that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” are “private entitIES" (imaginary rulings which Class NEVER obtained), a North Carolina judge “WARNED” ALL NORTH CAROLINA "POLICE OFFICERS" TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES (to protect their property from the consequences of lawsuits that the public would file against such "police officers" now that they would no longer be protected from such lawsuits by governmental immunity). http://www.rvbeypublications.com/sit...licewarned.pdf. But, these claims are not so.

    NOTE:
    First of all, if Class had known ANYTHING at all about North Carolina law at the time, then he would have NEVER created the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax” in the first place, because doing so only demonstrates the extent of his own IGNORANCE of North Carolina law (explained below).

    THE TRUTH:
    1. No such “warning” was ever issued BECAUSE CLASS NEVER OBTAINED THE IMAGINARY UNDERLYING RULINGS THAT WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE NECESSITATED SUCH A “WARNING” IN THE FIRST PLACE. (See the "BOMBSHELL: Fourth Administrative Ruling Hoax" DIRCETLY ABOVE.). This is why Class has never published a copy of this imaginary "warning" online (something that he would have certainly done if this imaginary warning had actually been real).

    2. FOR OVER A CENTURY, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL (AND A LEGALLY INEFFECTIVE) ACT IN NORTH CAROLINA FOR DEBTORS (like police officers facing future lawsuits) TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID PAYING THEIR CREDITORS (like future lawsuit judgment creditors). Here's how the law actually works. In this case, the defendant lost a breach of contract lawsuit and owed the plaintiff $200,000. But, the defendant had no money, so the plaintiff could not collect it at the time. A year later, the defendant became the owner of valuable parcel of real property and, fearing the plaintiff would try to collect the debt by selling his real property, the defendant immediately PURPORTED (means "pretended") TO PUT THE REAL PROPERTY INTO THE NAME OF A TRUST (or, what Rod Class calls putting property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES"). No money changed hands. But, the plaintiff moved to have the real property sold anyway and moved to have the sale proceeds applied to what the defendant owed him anyway. The court agreed and did exactly that! http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "THE TRIAL COURT DETERMINED THAT THE [defendant's] CONVEYANCE [of the real property] TO THE TRUST WAS NOT VALID [not effective] IN THAT IT FAILED TO [legally] CONVEY TITLE [of the real property] TO THE TRUSTEE [of the trust]. THE TRIAL COURT ALSO CONCLUDED THAT EVEN IF THE CONVEYANCE WAS VALID, IT WOULD CONSTITUTE A FRAUDULENT TRANSFER [under the subject statute and under a century of case law] AND [that] IT [the transfer] COULD BE AVOIDED [means "legally undone" if it was ever done in the first place]." (The preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph of the case.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    THIS HAS BEEN THE LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY:
    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "Aman v. Wlker, 165 N.C. 224, 81 S.E. 162 [a 1914 case from the Supreme Court of North Carolina] is a 'landmark case' on FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES. It is therein stated: "... If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY and the grantor [the person pretending to put the property into other peoples' names] did not retain [means "keep"] [other] property fully sufficient and available TO PAY HIS DEBTS [like future lawsuit money judgments]... , it [the conveyance] IS INVALID [means "VOID", "INEFFECTIVE" and "DID NOT WORK"] [to defeat the claims of]... CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors];... ." (The preceding text is in the 2nd full paragraph of the case and includes the block indented, quoted section.); "A CONVEYANCE [a pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS VOLUNTARY when it is NOT FOR VALUE [means not "SOLD" to the transferee AT FULL PRICE]... ." (The immediately preceding text is in the 3rd full paragraph of the case, not including the block indented, quoted section.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "[Over a century ago] in Aman v. Walker, 165 N.C. 224, 81 S.E. 162 (1914), the North Carolina Supreme Court set forth the principles governing fraudulent conveyances as follows: ... ; (2) If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY, and the grantor [the person pretending to put property into other peoples' names] DID NOT RETAIN [means "keep"] [other] PROPERTY [that was] FULLY SUFFICIENT AND AVAILABLE TO PAY HIS DEBTS [like future lawsuit judgments] ... IT [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS INVALID [means "VOID" and "DID NOT WORK" to defeat the claims of]... CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors]. (3) If the CONVEYANCE [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] is VOLUNTARY and MADE WITH THE ACTUAL INTENT ON THE PART OF THE GRANTOR [the person pretending to put the property into other peoples' names] TO DEFRAUD CREDITORS [like future lawsuit judgment creditors], IT [the pretended transfer of property into other peoples' names] IS VOID [means "INEFFECTIVE", "IT NEVER HAPPENED" and "IT DID NOT WORK" to defeat the claims of future lawsuit judgment creditors]... ." (The preceding test is in the 3rd full paragraph and includes the block indented quoted section.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    3. In addition to having been illegal and ineffective for more than a century under case law (above), such FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS have also been illegal and ineffective FOR TWO DECADES, BY NORTH CAROLINA STATUTE. By statute, any attempt by creditors (like police officers facing future lawsuits) to put their property into other peoples' names in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (like future lawsuit judgment creditors) HAS BEEN ILLEGAL AND INEFFECTIVE, which, of course, defeats the purpose of putting property into other peoples' names in the first place (because doing so WOULD NOT protect a debtor’s property from lawsuit judgment creditors ANYWAY). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in an effort to defeat the claims of lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    THIS IS THE CURRENT STATUTE ON THE SUBJECT IN NORTH CAROLINA:
    https://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Enacted...rticle_3A.html LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS STATUTE: "39-23.4. ... . (a) A TRANSFER [of property into other peoples' names] made ... by a DEBTOR [like a police officer facing a future lawsuit] is VOIDABLE [means can be legally "undone"] as to a CREDITOR [like a future lawsuit judgment creditor], whether the creditor's claim [the facts giving rise to the creditor's lawsuit] arose [occurred] BEFORE or AFTER the TRANSFER was made... , IF THE DEBTOR MADE THE TRANSFER... : (1) With the INTENT to HINDER, DELAY, DEFRAUD and CREDITOR of the DEBTOR; OR (2) Without RECEIVING... [FULL PRICE for the property]. (b) In determining INTENT under subdivision (a)(1) of this section [the immediately preceding section above], ... [the court may consider]... whether: (1) The TRANSFER... was made to an insider [like a friend or relative]; (2) [whether] The DEBTOR retained [means "kept"] POSSESSION or CONTROL of the property TRANSFERRED AFTER THE TRANSFER;... (4) [whether] BEFORE THE TRANSFER WAS MADE... , THE DEBTOR HAD BEEN SUED OR THREATENED WITH SUIT [read this phrase again]; (5) Whether the transfer was of SUBSTANIALLY ALL OF THE DEBTOR'S ASSETS [or only part of the debtor's assets]... ." (The preceding text is at section "39-23-4. (a) and (b) at about 45% through the text of the statute.). Thus, any such pretended transfer of property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES" in order to avoid paying future lawsuit judgment creditors WOULD BE BOTH "ILLEGAL" AND "WOULD NOT WORK" (to defeat those claims) ANYWAY. So, any such pretended transfer WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS IN THE FIRST PLACE. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    In this case, the defendant was a millionaire whose most valuable asset was a parcel of real property. The defendant owned a company that borrowed money to buy an airplane and the defendant personally guaranteed repayment of the loan. But, neither the defendant or his company repaid the loan. Fearing a lawsuit, the defendant and his wife formed a new company and HE PUT HIS REAL PROPERTY INTO THE NAME OF THAT NEW COMPANY (or, what Rod Class calls putting property "INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES"). No money changed hands. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...=2&as_sdt=4,34. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS CASE: "...[In sorting out the case, the court wrote] [O]UR LEGISLATURE [referring to the North Carolina legislature] ENACTED THE UNIFORM FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS ACT, LATER RENAMED THE UNIFORM VOIDABLE TRANSFERS ACT ("UVTA")... NEARLY TWO DECADES GO [note how long ago North Carolina passed this statute]." (The preceding text is in the 1st paragraph below the heading entitled, "B. Interpretation of 'Transfer'", at about 34-40% through the text of the case.).

    4. Unknown to Class, FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL ACT in North Carolina (and for decades, a violation of the Judicial Code Of Conduct) FOR A JUDGE TO ILLEGALLY “WARN”, COUNSEL, ADVISE OR RECOMMEND that anyone (including police officers facing future lawsuits) "BREAK THE LAW" by putting their property into other peoples' names in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (AN ILLEGAL ACT that would not protect the debtor's property anyway). Any REAL judge who issued such an ILLEGAL "warning" would immediately be removed from office and disbarred. But, Class does not know this.

    ANALYSIS: Thus, in manufacturing the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax”, Class was so IGNORANT of North Carolina law that he did not know then and does not know now that ALL OF THE "FACTS" that he alleges in this hoax are LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER NORTH CAROLINA LAW, which conclusively establish this lie as the hoax that it is. THIS IS BECAUSE NO REAL NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE WOULD "BREAK THE LAW" --- BY "ILLEGALLY" WARNING POLICE OFFICERS TO "BREAK THE LAW" --- BY DOING SOMETHING "ILLEGAL" (PUTTING THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID PAYING LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS)--- IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUITS WHICH WILL "NEVER SUCCEED" (DUE TO IMMUNITY)--- OR FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS WHO WILL "NEVER EXIST" (DUE TO IMMUNITY) --- ESPECIALLY GIVEN THAT ANY SUCH "ILLEGAL " ACT IS "REVERSIBLE" ANYWAY AND THEREFORE WOULD NOT PROTECT THE DEBTOR'S PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS IN THE FIRST PLACE (MAKING SUCH AN EFFORT ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS). But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    5. If more be necessary, North Carolina law already makes the EQUITY IN A HOMESTEAD (a residential property occupied by the owners), VEHICLE AND CERTAIN OTHER PROPERTY “EXEMPT” (“protected”) from the claims of lawsuit judgment creditors up to a certain amount ANYWAY. THUS, IN MOST CASES, THIS EXEMPTION WOULD ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR POLICE OFFICERS TO "ILLEGALLY" PRETEND TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES' NAMES, EVEN IF THAT "ILLEGAL" ACT WOULD PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS (AND IT WOULD NOT). But, Class does not know this. Constitution of the State Of North Carolina Art. 16 § 1C-1601. http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislat...Article_16.pdf

    For more information on the “Property In Other Peoples' Names Hoax”, see Class’ internet radio show, “Episode 966" on Talkshoe (spelled correctly) AIB radio, recorded or posted on 12-12-2015. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...=2&pageSize=15 or simply Google “Post Oak Public Relations”. https://www.linkedin.com/in/harvey-wharfield-0b56746. Further, be sure to look into William H. Gilpatric, IV of Middlesex County, Maine (address and contact information withheld). Gilpatric is aware of all the parties involved in the hoax and how it was manufactured and marketed.

    ANALYSIS:
    Suffice it to say, this is one of Class’ more embarrassingly-amateur hoaxes. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT --- AND CLASS DOES NOT.). Class does not lie to people for whom he has respect. Class only lies to people for whom he has no respect. The PATHOLOGICAL LIES reflected in this particular hoax speak volumes about what Class REALLY thinks of the American people. Class pretends to be a humble public servant who is only revealing the "hidden truth" about the law and the legal system to the down-trodden masses. But, this is not so. Class is actually a calculating and manipulative charlatan with no conscience whatsoever and no moral compass whatsoever. Class' two missions in life are to glorify himself and to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and their appointees for doing their jobs. If he has to lie to the American people and commit fraud upon the American people in the process of inciting this hatred, that is perfectly fine with him. Class has no intention of telling you the truth. None.

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 76 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ANALYSIS:
    ROD CLASS (with his inability to read, his lack of education, his ignorance of the law, his delusional belief system, his worthless, amateur legal theories, his lack of honesty and his 100% failure rate in court in 76 consecutive losses) IS "LIVING PROOF" THAT THOSE WHO PRACTICE LAW (AND THOSE WHO TEACH THE LAW) SHOULD:
    1). BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE EDUCATION (a "Bachelor's Degree");
    2). BE REQUIRED TO ALSO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL THREE TO FOUR YEAR LAW SCHOOL EDUCATION (a "Juris Doctor's Degree");
    3). BE REQUIRED TO PASS THE STATE BAR EXAM (takes three days);
    4). BE REQUIRED TO UNDERGO A RIGOROUS STATE CHARACTER AND FITNESS BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION WHICH TAKES SEVERAL MONTHS OR YEARS (NO MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY, NO CRIMINAL HISTORY, honesty, credit history, interviews of employers, teachers, former co-workers, neighbors, relatives, taking finger print samples, taking hand writing samples, etc.).
    5). BE LICENSED BY THE STATE AND BE SUBJECT TO THE CONTINUOUS OVERSIGHT AND DISCIPLINE OF THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT, THE STATE SUPREME COURT (in order to protect the public from INCOMPETENCE and FRAUD).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 3rd March 2018 at 16:45.

  6. Link to Post #6
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 6: THE "LAWYERS HAVE NO AUTHORITY HOAX" AND RELATED HOAXES ABOUT LAWYERS:

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    ARTICLES:
    https://govbanknotes.wordpress.com/2...in-courtrooms/ (Class is the REAL author of this article and was effectively so credited in the final paragraph BEFORE THE VIDEO.);
    https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/ (same as above);
    http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/atto...in-courtrooms/ (same as above);
    https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.co...of-government/ (The person indicated as the "author" of this article is a partner of Rod Class' CHARLATAN PARTNER in an unrelated, anti-vaccine website. Class was the REAL author of this article.);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-bar-card3.pdf (Class pretends to be "Judge DALE" and describes his belief system on this subject).
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (At pages 7-8 and 75-76, Class pretends to be "Judge DALE" and describes his belief system on this subject).

    VIDEOS:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vieooNH-SkE (Class explaining his belief system on this subject);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (At 43:50-44:55, Rod Class' chief CHARLATAN PARTNER pretends to quote "Judge DALE" in support of this very hoax);

    CLASS' AMATEUR MISTAKE:
    Rod Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that FEDERAL law governs EVERY legal subject. So, when he was unable to find any FEDERAL statute governing the licensing or regulation of lawyers or the practice of law, he MISTAKENLY CONCLUDED that lawyers have "NO LICENSE" and "NO LEGAL AUTHORITY" to practice law.

    THE TRUTH:
    Unknown to Rod Class, the reason that he was unable to find any FEDERAL legislation on the subject is that STATE LAW GOVERNS THE LICENSING AND REGULATION OF LAWYERS AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW. So, Class (as usual) was looking for the law IN THE WRONG PLACE! But, Class doesn't know enough to even realize this.

    THE HOAXES:
    Regardless, this MISTAKEN CONCLUSION infuriated Class. So, he created, manufactured, embellished and/or published an ENTIRE SERIES OF HOAXES to incite hatred and violence against lawyers. These hoaxes are exposed individually below.

    MISUNDERSTANDING FEDERAL LAW:
    Rod Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that FEDERAL law governs EVERY legal subject. (This is precisely why he pretended to be a "retired FEDERAL judge" in the "Judge DALE forgeries", why he only cites FEDERAL statutes in support of his false claims and why he uses the phrase, "Congressional [meaning FEDERAL] intent".). Class does not know that FEDERAL law ONLY governs that TINY LIST of legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the U.S. Constitution AND THAT under the tenth amendment, STATE LAW GOVERNS EVERYTHING ELSE (including the licensing and regulation of lawyers, drivers licenses, etc.). http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment. This means that ALMOST ALL OF THE LAW IN OUR COUNTRY IS STATE LAW, NOT FEDERAL LAW (95-99%? MULTIPLIED BY 50 STATES). Note that if the law really was as Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVED it to be (FEDERAL law governs every legal subject), THERE WOULD BE NO NEED FOR STATE LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THE TENTH AMENDMENT WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY MEANINGLESS.

    Class makes this AMATEUR mistake about FEDERAL law because he misunderstands the "supremacy clause" in the U.S. Constitution. Class MISTAKENLY believes that under the "supremacy clause", FEDERAL LAW IS "ALWAYS SUPREME" TO STATE LAW. But, this is not so. Unknown to Class, under the "supremacy clause", FEDERAL LAW IS ONLY "SUPREME" TO STATE LAW IF (AND ONLY IF) THERE IS A DIRECT CONFLICT BETWEEN FEDERAL LAW AND STATE LAW ON THE SAME LEGAL SUBJECT. But, such direct conflicts between FEDERAL law and STATE law on the same legal subject are EXTREMELY RARE, because FEDERAL and STATE law govern ENTIRELY DIFFERENT ("OPPOSITE") legal subjects. So, when there is NO DIRECT CONFLICT between FEDERAL law and STATE law on the SAME legal subject (which is almost all of the time), STATE LAW IS THE FINAL WORD ON ALL STATE LAW LEGAL SUBJECTS (such as the licensing and regulation of lawyers and driver's licenses, etc.). But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BASICS:
    Unknown to Rod Class, the U.S. Constitution "divided the powers" (divided the JURISDICTION to regulate every legal subject) between the FEDERAL government and the STATE governments. This division of powers (division of jurisdiction) WAS BASED ON LEGAL SUBJECT MATTER. The U.S. Constitution LIMITED the FEDERAL government to regulating ONLY A TINY LIST of legal SUBJECTS that were expressly delegated to it in the U.S. Constitution. The tenth amendment reserved to the STATES the power to regulate EVERYTHING ELSE (ALL OTHER LEGAL SUBJECTS NOT DELEGATED TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, such as the licensing and regulation of lawyers and driver's licenses, etc.).

    SIMPLIFICATION:
    Under this constitutional division of powers (division of jurisdiction) between the FEDERAL and STATE governments, a legal subject must be governed EITHER by FEDERAL law OR by STATE law, BUT NOT BY BOTH. So, if a legal subject IS governed by FEDERAL law, it IS NOT governed by STATE law. Likewise, if a legal subject IS governed by STATE law, it IS NOT governed by FEDERAL law. Thus, FEDERAL law and STATE law GOVERN DIFFERENT ("OPPOSITE") LEGAL SUBJECTS.

    PURPOSE:
    The purpose of this constitutional division of powers (division of jurisdiction) between the FEDERAL and STATE governments was to actually make it "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" for the FEDERAL government to regulate any STATE legal subject, otherwise the STATES would not have joined the union. (Note also that this division of powers (division of jurisdiction) also prevents the FEDERAL and STATE government from "stepping on each others' toes".).

    LIMITED "SCOPE" OF FEDERAL LAW:
    NOT ONLY IS FEDERAL LAW LIMITED "BY SUBJECT" (to those subjects expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the constitution), FEDERAL LAW IS ALSO LIMITED "IN SCOPE" (to those subjects expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the constitution). STATE LAW GOVERNS EVERYTHING ELSE. Here's how it works.

    The United States Code ("U.S.C.") is a collection of all of the current FEDERAL statutes divided into separate categories so that all of the statutes on the same subject are organized together (to make research of a particular subject easier). There are currently 54 numbered "TITLES" (or SUBJECTS) in the U.S.C. For example, Title 12 is "COMMERCE", Title 18 is "CRIMES", Title 28 is "THE JUDICIARY" and Title 49 is "TRANSPORTATION". But, the statutes in these four Titles DO NOT GOVERN "ALL COMMERCE", "ALL CRIMES", "ALL JUDICIARIES" or "ALL TRANSPORTATION" in the country. Instead, these statutes ONLY GOVERN THESE LEGAL SUBJECTS ONLY INSOFAR AS THEY RELATE DIRECTLY TO A LEGAL SUBJECT THAT WAS EXPRESSLY DELEGATED TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION (STATE LAW GOVERNS EVERYTHING ELSE).

    So, Title 18 does NOT govern "ALL COMMERCE" in the country. It only governs COMMERCE insofar as it relates directly to legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the U.S. Constitution, like "INTERSTATE" or "INTERNATIONAL" COMMERCE (STATE law governs ALL OTHER COMMERCE in the country). (This is precisely why the Uniform Commercial Code is STATE law, NOT FEDERAL law). Likewise, Title 18 does NOT govern "ALL CRIMES" in the country. It only governs CRIMES insofar as they relate directly to legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the FEDERAL constitution, like CRIMES involving "INTERSTATE" COMMERCE, "INTERNATIONAL" CRIME or CRIMES committed by active-duty U.S. military personnel on U.S. military bases (STATE law governs ALL OTHER CRIMES in the country). Similarly, Title 28 does NOT govern ALL "JUDICIARIES" in the country. It only governs JUDICIARIES and COURTS insofar as they as they relate directly to JUDICIARIES and COURTS that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the U.S. Constitution, THE FEDERAL COURTS (STATE law governs ALL OTHER JUDICIAL, COURT and LEGAL PROCEDURAL MATTERS in the country). Finally, Title 49 does NOT govern "ALL TRANSPORTATION" in the country. It only governs TRANSPORTATION insofar as it relates directly to legal subjects that were expressly delegated to the FEDERAL government in the FEDERAL Constitution, like "INTERSTATE" TRANSPORTATION, "INTERNATIONAL" TRANSPORTATION or "U.S. MILITARY" TRANSPORTATION (STATE law governs ALL OTHER TRANSPORTATION MATTERS in the country). But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    HOAX CONTINUED:
    Class correctly notes that PRIVATE lawyers formed the PRIVATE American Bar Association ("ABA") in 1878. https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE (at the 1st, 2nd & 3rd paragraphs): "[A private] Connecticut Attorney... invited a group of 100 [private] attorneys from 21 states... to meet on the 21st day of August of 1878, at Saratoga Springs, New York, to organize the [private] American B.A.R. Association." (Note that Class uses the FAKE acronym, "B.A.R.", when referring to the "American B.A.R. Association".). Class also correctly notes that the PRIVATE American Bar Association ("ABA") was never created, authorized or sanctioned “BY CONGRESS” (the LEGISLATIVE branch of the FEDERAL government). https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE (at the 6th, 7th & 8th paragraphs): "The [American] B.A.R. Association HAS NO [FEDERAL] LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY to have been created. They're [sic] a private corporation... . THERE IS NO SUCH STATUTE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE [which are "FEDERAL" statutes]!!! The [American] B.A.R. [Association] is a private industry, a private association... . WHERE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE [which are "FEDERAL" statutes] WERE LAWYERS... EVER GIVEN THE AUTHORITY to practice law in a courtroom... . No [American] B.A.R. [Association] Attorney HAS ANY ["FEDERAL"] LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY to prosecute anyone in court." Unfortunately, Class MISTAKENLY CONFUSES the ABA with the STATE bars. He MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "THE ABA IS THE BAR" (which he MISTAKENLY BELIEVES believes is the SINGLE, NATIONAL AUTHORITY that licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law). https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.co...of-government/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE (at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th & 9th paragraphs): "[We must] take back our courts and judicial branch of government from the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION and getting BAR-LICENSED attorneys out of elected positions... . [O]NLY MEMBERS OF THIS POWERFUL UNION OF LAWYERS, CALLED THE ABA... [ARE ALLOWED TO] PRACTICE LAW... . THE STATE DOES NOT... HOLD BAR EXAMINATIONS, NOR ISSUE STATE LICENSES TO LAWYERS. THE ABA... HOLDS THEIR (sic) PRIVATE [BAR] EXAMINATIONS... AND ISSUES THEM SO-CALLED LICENSE[S] (sic) TO PRACTICE LAW. THE ABA IS THE ONLY... [AUTHORITY] THAT CAN PUNISH OR DISBAR A LAWYER... . Only the ABA... can remove any of these lawyers from... office... . This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union... . NO NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION, OTHER THAN THE BAR, ISSUES THEIR (sic) OWN STATE LICENSES. All [other] professional and occupational licenses are issued by the state."

    ANALYSIS:
    Class' words (quoted above) PROVE that:
    1). Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that licensing and regulation of lawyers is a legal subject that is governed by "FEDERAL" law ("CONGRESS", "STATUTES AT LARGE");
    2). Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that the branch of government with the Constitutional power to license and regulate lawyers is the "LEGISLATIVE" branch (“CONGRESS”, "LEGISLATION", "STATUTES AT LARGE");
    3. Class MISTAKENLY CONFUSES the ABA with the STATE bars. He MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "THE ABA IS THE BAR" (which he MISTAKENLY BELIEVES is the SINGLE, NATIONAL AUTHORITY that licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law).

    On the foregoing basis, Rod Class MISTAKENLY CONCLUDED that lawyers have "NO LICENSE" and "NO LEGAL AUTHORITY" to practice law.

    THE TRUTH:
    1). Under the tenth amendment, ONLY the STATES have the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the FEDERAL government does not);
    2). Under the “separation of powers” doctrine, ONLY the JUDICIAL branch of government has the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the LEGISLATIVE branch of government does not);
    3). The “ABA” IS NOT THE "B.A.R" OR OTHERWISE THE SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY that licenses and regulates lawyers or the practice of law. There is no single, national authority that does this. Instead, it is the 50 STATES that license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law. But, Class does not know this.

    ANALYSIS:
    This means that Rod Class is WRONG IN EVERY SINGLE WAY that a person can POSSIBLY be WRONG about this subject. Noting is left on this subject for him to be WRONG about.

    WHY THE "STATE SUPREME COURTS" HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO LICENSE AND REGULATE LAWYERS:
    Like the FEDERAL government, STATE governments also have three (3) branches of government, the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch (legislature), the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch (governor) and the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch (the courts). All three branches of the ELECTED state government ARE EQUAL IN POWER to the other two ELECTED branches. But, EACH ELECTED BRANCH of state government IS INDEPENDENT from the other two branches. (The purpose of the "SEPARATION OF POWERS" doctrine is to prevent the concentration of power in any single branch of government.).

    Because EACH ELECTED BRANCH of government is INDEPENDENT of the other two branches, EACH ELECTED BRANCH of state government has the "INHERENT POWER” to manage ITS OWN INTERNAL AFFAIRS (and the HIGHEST AUTHORITY of EACH ELECTED BRANCH is generally charged with that responsibility). For example, the highest authority of the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch of state government (such as the speaker of the house and/or the senate majority leader) has the "INHERENT POWER" to pick who will "chair" and who will "sit" on ITS OWN state legislative and investigative committees (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches of state government). Similarly, the highest authority of the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch of state government (the governor) has the "INHERENT POWER" to appoint the heads of ITS OWN state agencies (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches of state government). Likewise, the highest authority of the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch of state government (The Supreme Court of the state) has the "INHERENT POWER" to license and regulate who will practice law in ITS OWN courts (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches of state government). This "INHERENT POWER" of EACH INDEPENDENT branch of state government to regulate THEIR OWN internal affairs (WITHOUT INTERFERENCE from the other two branches) reflects the "SEPARATION OF POWERS” doctrine which is found in the constitution of every STATE and in the U.S. Constitution. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    This means that neither the INDEPENDENT EXECUTIVE branch nor the INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL branch of government needs "LEGISLATION" from the LEGISLATIVE branch to "AUTHORIZE" them to do what they are ALREADY AUTHORIZED TO DO under their own INDEPENDENT "INHERENT POWERS" (under the "SEPARATION OF POWERS" doctrine found in every STATE constitution and in the FEDERAL constitution). Indeed, any "LEGISLATION" from the LEGISLATIVE branch of government PURPORTING TO "LIMIT" the INHERENT POWERS of the INDEPENDENT EXECUTIVE or the INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL branches of government to regulate THEIR OWN internal affairs WOULD ACTUALLY VIOLATE THE "SEPARATION OF POWERS" doctrine which is found in every STATE constitution and in the FEDERAL constitution. (This INDEPENDENCE is precisely why the lawyers are not licensed by the LEGISLATIVE branch and not listed by the Secretary Of State of the EXECUTIVE branch.). But, Class does not know enough to even realize this. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...en&as_sdt=4,44 (An excellent explanation of the "INHERENT POWER" of JUDICIAL branch of government to license and regulate the lawyers who practice law in ITS OWN courts begins in the 5th full paragraph here, not including block indented quoted portions, at about 20% through the text.); https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...en&as_sdt=4,10[url] (For more on the "INHERENT POWER" of the INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL branch to license and regulate the lawyers who practice law in ITS OWN courts, CLICK ON THE BLUE LINKS in the 12th full paragraph here, not including block indented quoted portions, at about 15% through the text).

    SIDE NOTE:
    Rod Class also MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "CASE LAW" ("common law") from the "JUDICIAL" branch of government is somehow "INFERIOR" to "STATUTORY LAW" ("legislation") from the "LEGISLATIVE" branch of government. He also MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "CASE LAW" from the "JUDICIAL" branch is somehow "unconstitutional". https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.co...of-government/. LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT: "Case-Law is Unconstitutional since Case-Law is enacted by the Judicial Branch of Government, not the Legislative Branch." (at the 1st sentence of the 21st paragraph here). But, this Rod Class' MISTAKEN BELIEF in this regard is not so.

    Unknown to Rod Class, WE ARE NOW, AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN GOVERNED BY CASE LAW ("common law"). We adopted our "common law" ("case law") legal system from the English "common law" ("case law") legal system. This legal system existed for hundreds and perhaps thousands of years WITH CASE LAW ONLY (WITHOUT ANY LEGISLATIVE STATUTES AT ALL). Congress, Parliament and STATE legislatures (which pass STATUTES) did not even exist until about 250 years ago (some much, much, much less). These new legislative bodies did not replace the courts as the source of the law, THEY ONLY ADDED A SECOND SOURCE! Today, CASE LAW ("common law") and STATUTORY LAW ("legislation") are BOTH IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT and constitute a SINGLE BODY called "the law".

    Under the FEDERAL Constitution and the Constitution of every STATE, the JUDICIAL and LEGISLATIVE branches of government are EQUAL IN POWER TO EACH OTHER AND THEIR LAWS ARE EQUAL IN FORCE TO THE LAWS OF THE OTHER. Indeed, because the JUDICIAL branch of government has the ADDITIONAL Constitutional power to declare LEGISLATIVE statutes "unconstitutional" (and strike them down), CASE LAW from the JUDICIAL branch is actually SUPERIOR to STATUTES from the LEGISLATIVE branch, not the other way around.

    HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE:
    A man is caught "CARRYING" in his car "DANGEROUS WEAPONS" onto the "grounds" of the "United States Capitol". So, he is charged with violating a "STATUTE" (from the LEGISLATIVE branch). The man pleads "GUILTY" to violating the "STATUTE", PROMISES (IN WRITING) NOT TO APPEAL (to the JUDICIAL branch) and actually walks out of court a free man. But, later the man changes his mind and FILES AN APPEAL of his case (in the JUDICIAL branch) anyway, DESPITE HAVING ALREADY PLEAD GUILTY AND DESPITE HAVING PROMISED (IN WRITING) NOT TO DO SO. Like the trial court, the Court of Appeals also correctly determines that the man is MENTALLY ILL. So, to protect the man from the consequences of his being mentally ill, it HIRES and PAYS a law firm and ORDERS IT (IN WRITING) to represent the man's interests on appeal.

    The problem for the law firm on appeal is that the man has already plead "GUILTY" and has already PROMISED (IN WRITING) NOT TO FILE AN APPEAL to the JUDICIAL branch). To get around these TWO MISTAKES, the law firm (WITHOUT ANY INVOLVEMENT BY THE MAN) takes the case (ALL ALONE) to the U.S. Supreme Court and ASKS THE COURT TO ACTUALLY "CHANGE" the existing "CASE LAW" ("common law") to allow people who have ALREADY plead "GUILTY" to a "STATUTORY" violation TO BE ABLE TO FILE AN "APPEAL" OF THEIR CONVICTION under these facts ANYWAY. The firm (WITHOUT ANY INVOLVEMENT BY THE MAN) wins the appeal.

    Now, having successfully effectuated a "CHANGE" in the existing "CASE LAW" ("common law") and having obtained an "ALL-NEW RIGHT TO APPEAL" in such cases, the firm files an appeal and argues to the Court that while the "STATUTE" that the man was charged with violating IS OTHERWISE CONSTITUTIONAL IN EVERY WAY, it was not Constitutional "AS APPLIED" to him under these facts, because he did not know he was on the "grounds" of the "United States Capitol" at the time (a NEW, FIFTH amendment argument which the man never knew about and never raised himself anywhere at any time). The Court agrees with the law firm and overturns the man's "STATUTORY" conviction on those FIFTH amendment (not SECOND amendment) grounds.

    ANALYSIS:
    The "STATUTE" was passed by the "LEGISLATIVE" branch. The Court decision was "CASE LAW" decided by the "JUDICIAL" branch. In this case, the "CASE LAW" of the "JUDICIAL" branch was "SUPERIOR" to the "STATUTE" of the "LEGISLATIVE" branch law, because the "JUDICIAL" branch has the ADDITIONAL Constitutional power to declare a "STATUTE" THAT IS OTHERWISE "CONSTITUTIONAL" IN EVERY WAY, unconstitutional "AS APPLIED" to the man under these facts. This means that it is EXTREMELY FORTUNATE for Rod Class that he is COMPLETELY WRONG about the alleged "UNCONSTITUTIONALITY" of "CASE LAW" and the alleged "INFERIORITY" of "CASE LAW" when compared to "STATUTES". Indeed, if the law was as Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVED it to be (that "CASE LAW" is "unconstitutional" and "INFERIOR" to "STATUTES"), there would have been no reason for the law firm to have appealed the man's criminal conviction to the Supreme Court (the JUDICIAL branch) challenging the Constitutionality of the STATUTE, because "CASE LAW" from the Supreme Court (the JUDICIAL branch) would be "unconstitutional" and "INFERIOR" to STATUTES from the LEGISLATIVE branch.

    NOTE:
    The overwhelming majority of FEDERAL and STATE law IS STILL "CASE LAW" (95%?). "CASE LAW" is also much more detailed, much more explanatory and much more instructive to the reader about what the law actually means. This is because it shows how the law applies to the particular facts of a case. Indeed, many of Class AMATEUR MISTAKES about the law are the direct result of refusal to read of "CASE LAW" (which is still the overwhelming majority of STATE and FEDERAL law, perhaps 95% or more). But, Class doesn't even know enough to realize this.

    POWERS OF THE STATE SUPREME COURTS (CONTINUED):
    ADDITIONAL "CONSTITUTIONAL" & "STATUTORY" POWER:
    IN ADDITION to the "INHERENT POWER” of each STATE Supreme Court to license and regulate lawyers who practice law in ITS OWN courts, some STATE "CONSTITUTIONS" ALSO expressly authorize the STATE Supreme Court to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (ex: Florida & New Jersey). http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/...ubmenu=3#A5S15 (Click on Article V and scroll down to section 15.); http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/lawscon...nstitution.asp (Scroll down to Article VI, Section 2, paragraph numbered "3", in the FINAL SENTENCE.). Likewise, some STATE "STATUTES" also expressly authorize the STATE Supreme Court to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (ex: New York, Texas, Virginia).
    http://codes.findlaw.com/ny/judiciar...-sect-460.html (at the END OF THE 1ST SENTENCE & note that New York's HIGHEST COURT is called the "Court Of Appeals".);
    http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.u.../htm/GV.81.htm (Scroll down to "Subchapter B", "Sec. 81.011", subsection "(b)" and "(c)");
    https://law.justia.com/codes/virgini...54.1-3910.html.
    Note that the foregoing CONSTITUTIONAL and LEGISLATIVE provisions (authorizing the STATE Supreme Courts to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law) DO NOT "LIMIT" the INHERENT POWERS of the JUDICIAL branch of government, THEY ACTUALLY ADD TO THOSE POWERS! Note also that EVERY STATE also has a LEGISLATIVE STATUTE making it a CRIME to practice law without a license issued by the Supreme Court of the STATE, thereby achieving (in reverse) the SAME RESULT as a STATUTE that REQUIRES a person to have a license in order to practice law. https://www.ncbar.gov/media/299201/u...w-statutes.pdf (at 84-4). Thus, it is NOT TRUE that there is "no constitutional" and/or "no legislative" authority for lawyers to practice law. But, it is also true that no "legislative" authority is required in the first place. But, Rod Class does not know this.

    ABOUT THE ABA:
    The ABA (which Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES "IS THE BAR" and the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law) is actually an irrelevant, insignificant, voluntary, trade association FOR LAWYERS WHO WANT TO JOIN (and receive a monthly magazine). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Bar_Association. LAWYERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MEMBERS OF THE ABA and MORE than TWO THIRDS of the lawyers in the United States ARE NOT MEMBERS of the ABA. THE ABA HAS NO POWERS OVER LAWYERS, JUDGES, LAWS, COURTS OR THE PRACTICE OF LAW. But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    COMPARISON TO THE "AAA":
    Class' BELIEFS (that "the ABA is the B.A.R" and the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice law, that the ABA was never created, authorized or sanctioned by "CONGRESS" and that the ABA has a "MONOPOLY" on the practice of law) IS THE EQUIVALENT OF CLASS BELIEVING that drivers of motor vehicles have "no authority" to drive because they got their "driver's licenses" from the American Automobile Association ("AAA") which was never created, authorized or sanctioned by "CONGRESS" and which association has a "MONOPOLY" on driving of automobiles and on the entire transportation industry. But, of course, none of this is so. THE AAA, like the ABA, DOES NOT ISSUE LICENSES TO ITS MEMBERS, REGULATE DRIVERS, REGULATE DRIVING, MAKE DRIVING LAWS OR HAVE A "MONOPOLY" ON THE ENTIRE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY. The reality is that the ABA is to lawyers what the AAA is to drivers, "A CLUB" that one is permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO JOIN. But, Class does not know enough to even realize this.

    THE ABA IS A "MONOPOLY" HOAX:
    Class falsely claims that the ABA has a "MONOPOLY" on the practice of law. This is because he MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that "the ABA IS THE BAR" (the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice law). https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/ (Rod Class is the REAL author of this article and was effectively so credited in the final paragraph). LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE: "This type of MONOPOLY [referring to the ABA] is against the Taft-Hartley Act, The Clayton trust Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act. They're (sic) [referring to the ABA] a SELF-APPOINTED MONOPOLY." (at the end of the 8th full paragraph).

    But, Rod Class' MISTAKEN BELIEF in this regard is not so. MORE THAN TWO THIRDS OF AMERICAN LAWYERS ARE NOT EVEN MEMBERS IN THE ABA. Thus, the ABA cannot possibly constitute a SINGLE “MONOPOLY” over the practice of law. Likewise, the STATE bars in which all lawyers REALLY ARE MEMBERS are not “MONOPOLIES" either. But, even if STATE bars were "MONOPOLIES", THEN THERE WOULD BE EXACTLY FIFTY (50) SUCH "MONOPOLIES", THEREBY NOT CONSTITUTING A SINGLE "MONOPOLY", BY DEFINITION. But, Rod Class does not know any of this.

    Further, unknown to Rod Class, a "MONOPOLY" in a service industry is NOT determined by whether all members of a service occupation are licensed by the STATE. If this were the case, then ANY person employed in a service industry requiring a STATE license would be engaged in a "monopoly" profession (all hair dressers, all electricians, all dentists, etc.). INSTEAD, A REAL "MONOPOLY" in a service industry IS DETERMINED BY "HOW MANY EMPLOYERS" EMPLOY PERSONS WITH LICENSES ISSUED BY THE STATE. So, if all hairdressers worked for A SINGLE BEAUTY PARLOR, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". If all electricians worked for A SINGLE ELECTRICAL COMPANY, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". If all dentists worked for A SINGLE DENTIST’S OFFICE, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". If all lawyers worked for A SINGLE LAW FIRM, then THAT would be a REAL "monopoly". But, of course, none of that is the case.

    THE "BAR CARD" HOAX:
    Mistakenly believing that the "ABA IS THE BAR" (and THE SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers), Class MOCKINGLY (and misguidedly) refers to a lawyer's license to practice law as a "UNION" or "BAR CARD" (referring to a MEMBERSHIP CARD in the ABA). https://anticorruptionsociety.files....-bar-card3.pdf;https://www.youarelaw.org/get-a-good...ad-this-first/ (Rod Class is the REAL author of this article and was effectively so credited in the final paragraph). LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING TEXT IN THIS ARTICLE: "[The ABA is] a private corporation, THEY (sic) ISSUE THEIR OWN UNION CARDS, WHICH THEY DECEPTIVELY CALL "LICENSES"... . THE B.A.R. [ABA] ISSUES ITS OWN B.A.R. [ABA] CARDS, NOT LICENSES... . They [referring to members in the ABA] want to prosecute people for practicing law without a license, WHEN THEY [themselves] DON'T HAVE ONE!!! ALL THEY HAVE IS A STINKING UNION CARD." (in the 8th, 20th and 24th paragraphs). Thus, Class does NOT know that "THE ABA IS NOT THE BAR", that "THE ABA DOES NOT ISSUE LICENSE TO LAWYERS" or that "THE 50 STATES actually do".

    THE "ORIGINAL 13TH AMENDMENT HOAX", "THE TITLE OF NOBILITY HOAX" AND "B.A.R. HOAX":
    BACKGROUND: Thirty-four of the fifty-five (34 of the 55) American founding fathers who actually attended the United States' constitutional convention and who actually wrote the words to the U.S. Constitution were American lawyers. https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us...inating-facts/ (Scroll down to about 80% through text of this page). So, about two out of every three authors of our Constitutional were American lawyers. At the time that the U.S. Constitution was written, our 55 founding fathers, including 34 of which were American lawyers, had two concerns that rose to the level of constitutional importance. First, was the European institution of "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"). Second, was the internal threat of European "LOYALISTS".

    At the time, Europe was divided into TWO CLASSES of people, "NOBILITY" ("ROYALS") and "COMMONERS" ("NON-ROYALS"). Under this institution, a person's station in life was determined by their birth and not determined by their individual merit. Our 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, did not want the institution of "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") to divide Americans into two classes of people as had occurred in Europe. Instead, our 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, wanted a person's station in life to be determined by individual merit (and not inherited). Also at the time, the people living in the American colonies were largely either American PATRIOTS or English LOYALISTS. Our 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, did not want persons who were LOYAL to England (or to any other FOREIGN country) to hold office in the United States. They correctly believed that persons with FOREIGN-GIVEN titles of nobility, FOREIGN offices (positions) and persons receiving FOREIGN salaries or gifts (effectively "bribes") were more likely to be European "LOYALISTS" than other Americans were.

    So, in actually writing the words to the U.S. Constitution, these 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, actually made it "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" for the United States itself to grant a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") to anyone AND made it "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" for a person with a FOREIGN "title of nobility" ("royalty"), FOREIGN office (position) or receiving FOREIGN salaries or gifts (effectively "bribes') to hold office in the United States without the consent of Congress. Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution reads as follows:

    "No TITLE OF NOBILITY ["ROYALTY"] shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding an office or trust under them [the United States], shall, without the consent of Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or TITLE, of any kind whatsoever, from any KING, PRINCE, or FOREIGN STATE."

    ANALYSIS:
    What this means is that the 34 American lawyers who actually wrote the foregoing words to the U.S. Constitution not regard "THEMSELVES" as a threat to the United States. But, above all, this means that these 34 American lawyers who actually wrote the foregoing words to the original U.S. constitution did not regard the term, "ESQUIRE" (which most of them used) to be a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"), much less a "FOREIGN" "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"). If these 34 American lawyers who actually wrote these words to the original U.S. Constitution had actually intended to prohibit "lawyers" from holding office, then all 34 of them would have DISQUALIFIED THEMSELVES from ever holding office in their own country. Clearly, this was not their intent as many of them did go on to hold office in the United States afterwards.

    The proposed "original" 13th amendment was intended to strengthen the original constitutional prohibition against FOREIGN "titles of NOBILITY" (above) which was already found in Article I, section 9 of the original U.S. Constitution. It reads:

    "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any EMPEROR, KING, PRINCE or FOREIGN POWER, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

    Note that the ONLY material difference between this text and the text of in Article 1, Section 9 of the original U.S. Constitution is that this text deprived those with a "FOREIGN" title "NOBILITY" of their citizenship as well as the possibility of holding office in the country. Not surprisingly, American lawyers ALSO overwhelmingly supported and actually wrote the proposed "original" 13th amendment, which would have actually strengthened the prohibition against FOREIGN "titles of NOBILITY" already found in Article I, section 9 of the original U.S. Constitution (which was itself actually proposed, supported and written by American lawyers).

    ANALYSIS:
    What this means is that the American lawyers who actually wrote the words of the "original" 13th amendment did not regard "THEMSELVES" as a threat to the United States. But, above all, this means that these American lawyers who actually wrote these words of the "original" 13th amendment did not regard the term, "ESQUIRE" (which most of them used) to be a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"), much less a "FOREIGN" "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"). If these American lawyers who actually wrote the words of "original" 13th amendment had actually intended to prohibit "lawyers" from holding office or retaining their citizenship, then all of them would have DISQUALIFIED THEMSELVES from ever holding office in their own country and from retaining their American citizenship. Clearly, this was not their intent as many of them wanted to hold office (or already did hold office by that time) and all of them wanted to retain their American citizenship.

    Thus, it is simply not true that Article I, section 9 of the original U.S. Constitution OR the proposed "original" 13th amendment somehow prohibited American lawyers from holding office or somehow deprived American lawyers of their American citizenship. Neither provision prohibited American lawyers and neither provision was ever intended to prohibit American lawyers. Both provisions (above) were proposed by American lawyers, supported by lawyers and actually written by lawyers.

    The 55 founding fathers, including the 34 of which were American lawyers, were perfectly capable of writing a constitutional prohibition that EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED "lawyers" BY NAME. But, they did not do this in either provision. This is because they DID NOT intend to prohibit "lawyers" ("THEMSELVES") by either provision. Otherwise, they would have simply said so. Instead, they actually intended to prohibit, and did actually prohibit persons with a REAL "FOREIGN" given "titles of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") from holding office. The American lawyers who proposed, supported and who actually wrote the words of the "original" 13th amendment thought that we would be intelligent enough today to understand the difference between a "title of NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") and a title of "OCCUPATION" or "EDUCATION". Sadly, they were mistaken.

    Remember, Rod Class MISTAKENLY BELIEVES that the American "BAR" Association "IS THE BAR" (and is the SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY that licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law). So, he MISGUIDEDLY embellished and peddles an ENTIRELY SEPARATE HOAX to discredit that particular (AND COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT) "BAR". https://anticorruptionsociety.com/20...3th-amendment/.

    THE HOAX:
    Class falsely claims that it is illegal for lawyers to hold public office. To reach this absurd result, Class fraudulently claims that the "ORIGINAL" or "MISSING" 13th amendment (which was never ratified) would have prohibited those with a "FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY" from holding public office. So, Class fraudulently claims that the "ORIGINAL" or "MISSING" 13th amendment was ratified and that lawyers have a "FOREIGN" "TITLE OF NOBILITY". Specifically, Class fraudulently claims that the title, "ESQUIRE" which is used by some American lawyers, is bestowed on all American lawyers by the "QUEEN OF ENGLAND" (something "FOREIGN") and that the term, "ESQUIRE", is a "TITLE OF NOBILITY". But, none of this is so.

    For this hoax to work, Class had to CREATE THE ILLUSION that a "FOREIGN" POWER actually bestows a "TITLE OF NOBILITY" upon all American lawyers. So, Class FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that when American lawyers are “sworn-in” to the practice of law, THEY SWEAR AN "OATH OF ALLEGIANCE" TO THE "QUEEN OF ENGLAND" (representing a "FOREIGN" POWER), who, IN RETURN, bestows upon such American lawyers a "FOREIGN" "TITLE OF NOBILITY” (the title, “ESQUIRE”). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (At 44:00-44:55, Rod Class' CHARLATAN PARTNER pretends to quote "Judge DALE" who is actually Rodney "DALE" Class). But, this claim is not so. Below is the oath that American lawyers really make.

    http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.inbar.o...tion/Oaths.pdf (THIS IS A MUST SEE!)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSDTTXjDAoc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wSFvOu4u0o

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2yfTDGv2z4

    Note that lawyers actually make an oath to the U.S. Constitution and to the constitution of the state that issues them their license to practice law (not to any person, much less the "QUEEN").

    THE PHONY ACRONYM:
    In order to CREATE THE ILLUSION that American lawyers have a connection to some “FOREIGN” POWER (who allegedly issues them a "FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY"), Class FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that the term, "B.A.R" (as it appears in the American B.A.R. Association"), is an "ACRONYM" which stands for "British Accreditation Registry", an IMAGINARY organization which DOES NOT NOW, and NEVER HAS EXISTED. (Google it. There is not now and has never been such an IMAGINARY organization.). Class simply "made up" these three ridiculous words in order to manufacture a FRAUDULENT connection between American lawyers and something "FOREIGN" in support of this hoax. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k&t=2551s (At 44:00-44:55, Rod Class' CHARLATAN PARTNER pretends to quote "Judge DALE" who is actually Rodney "DALE" Class).

    A WORD ABOUT METAPHORS:
    A metaphor is a word symbol. The most common metaphor in the law is the term, "CASE". Originally, this term meant a lawyer's "brief CASE" in which a lawyer carried legal documents reflecting his/her client's legal affairs. But later, the term "CASE" was used to refer to a client's legal affairs themselves. This is because a lawyer's brief "CASE" came to symbolize a client's legal affairs themselves. So today, the term, "CASE", symbolizes a client's legal affairs themselves. But, the term "CASE" is not really as acronym for anything (any more than the term, "bar", is an acronym for anything).

    The legal terms "BAR" and "BENCH" are also metaphors and are directly related to one another. Originally, BOTH terms referred to wooden structures in the courtroom. Originally, the "BAR" was a wooden divider that separated the business portion of the courtroom from the public portion of the courtroom. Those people with business before the court and their lawyers were admitted "through the BAR" to conduct their business before the court. Later, the term, "BAR", was used to refer to attorneys collectively. This is because the "BAR" in the courtroom came to symbolize lawyers themselves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_(law) (Click on BOLD, BLUE TYPE that reads, "Bar (law)"). The very same thing is true with respect to the term, "BENCH". Originally, judges in the courtroom sat on a wooden "BENCH". Nobody, except judges were allowed to sit on the BENCH. Later, the term, "BENCH" was used to refer to judges collectively. This is because the "BENCH" in the courtroom came to symbolize judges themselves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bench_(law) (Click on BOLD, BLUE TYPE that reads, "Bench (law)"). But, the term, "BENCH" is not really an acronym for anything either (any more than the term, "bar", is an acronym for anything).

    QUESTION:
    Just out of curiosity, I'd like to know what Rod Class claims the term, "B.E.N.C.H", is an acronym for. How about, "British Esquire Nazi Communist Homosexuals", perhaps? Sounds good to me. Let's use this FAKE acronym in a hoax too!

    Similar, metaphors apply to other things like, "the COURT" (when actually referring to a judge or a panel of judges collectively), "the CROWN" (when actually referring to the king and/or queen collectively), the "THRONE" (when actually referring to the king and/or queen collectively), the "WHITE HOUSE" (when actually referring to the president), the "CABINET" (when actually referring to the president's advisers collectively), the "CAPITOL" (when actually referring to Congress collectively), the "PENTAGON" (when actually referring to the Department of Defense); "SCOTLAND YARD" (when actually referring to a British intelligence agency) and the term, "DOWNING STREET" (when actually referring to the prime minister of the U.K.). But, none of these metaphors are really acronyms for anything either (any more than the term, "bar", is an acronym for anything).

    The real reason that the term, "BAR", has become so important to CHARLATANS is that by FRAUDULENTLY claiming the term, "BAR" is an "ACRONYM" for "British Accreditation Registry" (an IMAGINARY organization which does not now and never has existed), the term, "BAR" allows CHARLATANS to manufacture a FALSE connection between American lawyers and a "FOREIGN head of state" so that, when combined with the FALSE claim that term, "ESQUIRE", is a "TITLE OF NOBILITY", the combination of BOTH FALSE CLAIMS results is the FALSE CONCLUSION that American lawyers have a "FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY", such that, if the "original" 13th amendment had actually been ratified, American lawyers would have been be prohibited from holding office and from holding citizenship in the United States.

    A WORD ABOUT "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY"):
    At the time of the American revolution, Europe was divided into TWO CLASSES of people, "NOBLES" ("ROYALS") and "COMMONERS" ("NON-ROYALS"). NOBLES did not marry COMMONERS and COMMONERS did not marry NOBLES. "NOBILITY" WAS INHERITED. "NOBLES" were people born to "NOBLE" parents of "NOBLE" blood. "COMMONERS" were people born to "COMMON" parents of "COMMON" blood. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...lish/nobility; http://www.yourdictionary.com/nobility (scroll down).

    To distinguish "NOBLES" from "COMMONERS", "NOBLES" INHERITED TITLES OF "NOBILITY", like "King", "Queen", "Prince". "Princess", "Duke" and "Duchess" (to signify their "NOBLE" BLOOD). At the time, "COMMONERS" had titles too. But, the titles of "COMMONERS" had to be EARNED (AND COULD NOT BE INHERITED). So, "COMMONERS" had EDUCATIONAL or OCCUPATIONAL titles, like "Sheriff", "Doctor", "Professor" and "Pastor", none of which were HEREDITARY TITLES OF "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") and none of which signified "NOBLE" BLOOD.

    The title "Knight" (or "Sir") was a hybrid title with characteristics of both. Knights could be born as "COMMONERS", but were granted the "NOBLE" title of, "Sir", as a reward for their service to true NOBILITY (usually valor in battle). But, unlike all other "NOBLE" titles, the title "Knight" or "Sir" could NOT BE INHERITED by the Knight's children. As a result, a Knight had the lowest "TITLE of NOBILITY" in rank (because a Knight had NO "NOBLE" BLOOD THAT COULD BE INHERITED BY THE KNIGHT'S HEIRS).

    Ranking EVEN BELOW a Knight (and, therefore, NOT A "NOBLE" AT ALL) was an "ESQUIRE". An "ESQUIRE" was the SERVANT of a Knight in battle, often carrying or holding his sword and shield in battle. The title "ESQUIRE" was not a "NOBLE" title at all, could not be INHERITED and did not signify "NOBLE" BLOOD. Instead, the occupational title "ESQUIRE" had to be EARNED like any other TITLE of any other "COMMONER". Thus, not every title in the world is a “FOREIGN TITLE OF NOBILITY” ("Mr." and Mrs." are examples of TITLES that ARE LIKEWISE NOT "FOREIGN TITLES OF NOBILITY" either.).

    In the Unites States, some lawyers use the professional title, "ESQUIRE". This is because lawyers are metaphorically (symbolically) the "SERVANTS" of their CLIENTS in legal "battles" and metaphorically (symbolically) carry their CLIENTS' legal "sword" and legal "shield" into legal "battles" for them. But, lawyers ARE NOT bestowed this EARNED professional title ("ESQUIRE") by any "FOREIGN" POWER, this EARNED professional title ("ESQUIRE") does not signify "NOBILITY" ("ROYALTY") or "NOBLE" ("ROYAL") BLOOD and cannot be inherited by the lawyer's children, like a real "TITLE OF NOBILITY" can.

    This means that the “ORIGINAL” or “MISSING” “13th AMENDMENT” (even if it had actually been ratified) would NOT have prohibited people with “EARNED”, “EDUCATIONAL” or “PROFESSIONAL” titles (including lawyers) from holding office (because such titles ARE NOT "titles of NOBILITY”, much less "FOREIGN" titles of "NOBILITY"). But, Rod Class does not know enough to even realize this. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT---AND ROD CLASS DOES NOT.).

    THE TRUTH:
    Thus, while the term, "bar", is a metaphor (a word symbol), the term, "bar", IS NOT an acronym for anything. There is NOT NOW, and there has NEVER BEEN a "British Accreditation Registry" (Google it). American lawyers do NOT swear an oath to ANYTHING “FOREIGN”. The “QUEEN OF ENGLAND” does not bestow the title “ESQUIRE” upon any American lawyer. The term, "ESQUIRE" is NOT a “title of NOBILITY” ("ROYALTY"), much less a "FOREIGN" "title of nobility" and the “ORIGINAL” or “MISSING” “13th AMENDMENT” was NEVER ratified in the first place. Thus, for all these reasons, there is nothing unconstitutional about an American lawyer holding public office or retaining American citizenship.

    CONCLUSION:
    Under the tenth amendment, ONLY the STATES have the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the FEDERAL government does not). Under the “separation of powers” doctrine, ONLY the JUDICIAL branch of government has the power to license and regulate lawyers and the practice of law (the LEGISLATIVE branch of government does not). The “ABA” is NOT THE SINGLE NATIONAL AUTHORITY which licenses and regulates lawyers and the practice of law. The 50 STATES that do that. The ABA has no connection whatsoever with any FEDERAL or STATE government or agency. The STATE bars ARE NOT “affiliates” or “franchises” or “subsidiaries” or otherwise "regulated" or "governed" by the ABA. The ABA has NOT "taken over the courts", "taken away the common law" or "taken away the grand jury system" . It has no ability to do so.

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 3rd March 2018 at 19:14.

  7. Link to Post #7
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 7: "THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 'CERTIFICATE' HOAX" (A.K.A. “WHY WAS ROD CLASS IN WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THE FIRST PLACE?”)

    QUESTION: Why was Rod Class in Washington, D.C. in the first place?

    ANSWER: He was manufacturing yet ANOTHER HOAX in an effort to "TRICK" his own followers an others into believing that "Congress" had authorized him to practice law without a license. (Class mistakenly believed that Congress had such a power. But, it does not. Class did not know that under Article I, section 8 (which lists all of the powers of Congress) and under the tenth amendment (which reserves TO THE STATES all powers not delegated to the federal government in the U.S. Constitution), ONLY THE STATES HAVE THE POWER TO DO THAT.). (1)

    Regardless, based on his MISTAKEN BELIEF, Class FORGED a two-page document (in all Italic font) consisting of a "FAKE" CONGRESSIONAL LETTERHEAD and a FAKE SIGNATURE PAGE (with a FAKE signature line for BOTH the HOUSE and the SENATE "judiciary committees"). (2) Class FRAUDULENTLY calls his FORGERY his "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL CERTIFICATE" or his "CREDENTIALS", despite that he created it AND ISSUED IT TO HIMSELF (a pattern with Rod Class). In his FORGERY, Class DESIGNATED HIMSELF a "Private Attorney General" under two CIVIL RIGHTS statutes (not realizing that such was actually a CIVIL RIGHTS "CLIENT" who could NOT practice law or represent another person in court). (3) In his FORGERY, Class also DESIGNATED HIMSELF a "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter" (not realizing that such was actually a Union CIVIL WAR SOLDIER 150 years ago). (4) Finally, in his FORGERY, Class also AUTHORIZED HIMSELF to practice law without a license (not realizing that Congress, from whom he would seek a "RECEIVED" stamp on his FORGERY, has no power to provide such an authorization). (No link to this FORGERY is yet available. It was found in Class' cases on Pacer.gov. which will not allow us to link to its documents). Class actually admits to all of this. https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._Two_Month.pdf (at 2nd page in paragraph 2-4. PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO the 4th PARAGRAPH.).


    BACKGROUND I: When ANYONE hand files ANY document with Congress, Congressional aides sign and date-stamp the word, "RECEIVED" on the top page of that document. Then, they provide the deliverer of the document with a duplicate of that same signed and date-stamped document for their own records (like a "receipt"). Class then uses the signed and date-stamped ("RECEIVED") duplicate of HIS OWN FORGERY to create the illusion that Congress (rather than Class) wrote and issued the FORGERY. (After all, by then Class' FORGERY appears to be on Congressional letterhead, bears Congressional date stamps and has signatures "from Congress"). But, in truth, no single Congressman (much less ALL OF CONGRESS) ever takes any action on the FORGERIES that Class' UNILATERALLY hand files with Congressional aides in this way. Indeed under the U.S. Constitution, Congress has no power to take any such action in the first place. But, Class does not know this.

    MISTAKES ON TOP OF MISTAKES: All of this means that Class was so legally INCOMPETENT that in creating this FORGERY, he actually solicited signatures and date-stamps FROM THE WRONG GOVERNMENTAL BRANCH (legislative instead of judicial) OF THE WRONG GOVERNMENTAL SOVEREIGN (federal instead of state). You cannot possible be more INCOMPETENT than that. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT, and Class does not.).

    BACKGROUND II: Class FRAUDULENTLY-MARKED his vehicle with several large FAKE vinyl decals to make it LOOK like a law enforcement vehicle. (6)

    FACTS: On May 30th, 2013, Class (in his imaginary capacity as a "Private Attorney General") was en route from North Carolina to Pennsylvania to "help" an unwary victim LOSE his weapons case there. But, Class stopped in D.C. along the way to obtain some Congressional aide signatures and date-stamps on his FORGERY. In so doing, Class illegally parked his conspicuously-marked vehicle on United States Capitol grounds in a parking lot located closest to occupied Congressional office buildings during business hours. This parking lot was clearly marked in such a way as to indicate that Class was not to park there.

    After illegally parking, Class went inside the adjacent Congressional office buildings for the reasons stated. When Class returned to the parking lot (delighted to have obtained what he had come for), he discovered that his conspicuously-marked vehicle was surrounded by a team of uniformed federal law enforcement officers who were busy peering through its windows and counting all of the illegal "dangerous weapons" that were visible inside and located next to occupied Congressional office buildings during business hours. (Think "Timothy McVeigh", the Murrah Federal Building and the Oklahoma City Bombing in a post-911 world.).

    When Class returned to his vehicle, officers asked him if the vehicle was his, he replied, "Yes". When officers asked Class it he had driven his vehicle onto United State Capitol grounds and parked it where it sat, Class replied, "Yes". When officers asked Class if the "dangerous weapons" inside the vehicle were his, he replied, "Yes". On the basis of these voluntary confessions (all of which Class openly admits to), Class was charged and convicted of "carrying" "dangerous weapons" "onto United States Capitol grounds". (7) It's that simple. There was nothing bizarre, unusual, curious, fraudulent, corrupt or illegal about what the officers or the courts did in this case.

    Officers obtained a search warrant. Inside Class' vehicle, federal officers found one fully-loaded rifle, three fully-loaded handguns, one of which was completely and illegally unsecured and positioned between the front seats for quick and easy access, several hundred more rounds of ammunition for all four firearms on-board, one large machete on the driver's side door for easy access, fourteen large knives & daggers of varying size and lethal effect, one illegal spring-deployed switch blade knife and three more axes of various sizes and lethal effect.

    Unknown to Class, his conduct (in carrying dangerous weapons onto U.S. Capitol grounds) not only violated federal law, it also violated the terms of his conceal and carry permit from North Carolina (which prohibits persons with such conceal and carry permits to carry firearms onto federal grounds where such is prohibited by federal law, as its was here). So, unknown to Class, his permit offered him no "defense" to the charges against him here. (8) Indeed, it constituted AN ADDITIONAL OFFENSE.

    Unknown to Class, even if he had a second amendment defense to "carrying" firearms or handguns onto United States Capitol grounds in a post 9-11 world, he had no second amendment defense to "carrying" the other "dangerous weapons" (including machetes, knives & daggers, switch blades and axes) onto United States Capitol grounds. So, Class is still factually guilty of violating the subject statute (which prohibits individuals from carrying DANGEROUS WEAPONS, not just firearms, onto U.S. Capitol grounds), even if he has a second amendment defense to carrying the firearms onto U.S. Capitol grounds

    NOTE: Class is PATHOLOGICALLY DESPERATE to appear to be something that he is not ("Private Attorney General", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter", "winning litigator", "legal genius", etc.).

    FACT: If Class had not stopped in D.C. to obtain Congressional aide signatures and a date-stamp "RECEIVED" on his FORGERY (in order to appear to be something that he is not), Class WOULD NOT have been arrested and convicted of "carrying DANGEROUS WEAPONS onto U.S. Capitol grounds".

    FACT: If Class had not ALSO fraudulently-marked his vehicle with FAKE vinyl decals (in order to appear to be something that he is not), Class' vehicle would have likely escaped the attention of federal law enforcement officers and Class WOULD NOT likely have been arrested or convicted.

    ANALYSIS: Many of Class’ legal problems are the direct result of his desperate attempts to appear to be something that he is not ("Private Attorney General", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter", "winning litigator", "legal genius", etc.).

    FINAL NOTE: You cannot fully appreciate Rod Class' arrest on weapons charges in this case without understanding Rod Class' history involving deadly weapons. Class is a TWICE-CONVICTED, weapons-related, CONVICTED FELON. In 2001, Class was ARRESTED and CONVICTED of possessing in his car an illegally-sawed-off, fully-loaded, Springfield shotgun (to increase its lethal effect). At the time of that ARREST, Class' was also in possession of two night sticks outfitted with concealed razor blades (to increase their lethal effect). In 2013, Class was ARRESTED and later CONVICTIED his Washington, D.C. for possessing in his car of one fully-loaded rifle, three fully-loaded handguns, one of which was illegally unsecured and positioned between the front seats for quick and easy access, several hundred more rounds of ammunition for all four firearms on-board, one large machete on the driver’s side door for easy access, fourteen large knives and daggers of varying size and lethal effect, one illegal spring-deployed switch blade knife and three axes of various sizes and lethal effect. In 2014, in North Carolina, Class was ARRESTED and CONVICTED of RESISTING ARREST and at the time of his arrest, Class was in possession of several packages of concealed razor-type blades which were found beneath his clothing when he was frisked. At the time of Class' 2001 ARREST in Ohio (above), Class was on probation for a previous Ohio, WEAPONS-REALTED, CRIMINAL CONVICTION (meaning Class not only committed a new crime 2001, HE ALSO VIOLATED HIS OHIO PROBATION). At the time of Class' 2013 ARREST in Washington, D.C. (above), Class was on probation for a previous North Carolina CRIMINAL CONVICTION (meaning Class not only committed a new crime in 2013, HE ALSO VIOLATED HIS NORTH CAROLINA PROBATION).


    FOOTNOTES:
    1). Class was mistaken about taking his FORGERY to Washington, D.C. to obtain Congressional aide signatures and a date stamp "RECEIVED" thereon because STATE LAW (NOT FEDERAL LAW) GOVERNS THE PRACTICE OF LAW:

    See Const., Art. 1, Sec. 8 (WHICH LISTS ALL OF THE POWERS OF CONGRESS). http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/pa...le-i-section-8 (Note that the power to authorize a person to practice law IS NOT ON THE LIST). Unknown to Class, ONLY THE STATES HAVE THE POWER TO DO THAT. http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment. Class makes this very same AMATEUR mistake with respect to driver's licenses which are likewise governed by STATE law (not by FEDERAL law).

    2. THE COURT DOES NOT BUY CLASS' FRAUDULENT CLAIMS THAT THE "HOUSE AND SENATE" AUTHORIZED HIM TO ACT AS A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL":

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 . (See Ruling 35).

    3. THE "CONCEPT" OF A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" (under the two statutes upon which Class relies) RELATES SOLELY TO PAYING ATTORNEYS WHO WIN CASES FOR VICTIMS OF FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. THE "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" IS THE "VICTIM" OF THE FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION AND IS THE "PLAINTIFF" IN THE FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE AND IS THE "CLIENT" OF AN ATTORNEY IN FEDERAL COURT (not someone who purports to act on behalf of the victim/plaintiff in court).

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    WHAT A REAL "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" LOOKS LIKE:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22c...&bih=613#spf=1.

    WHAT A FAKE "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" LOOKS LIKE: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22P...Rod+Class%22&* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

    4. WHAT A REAL "14TH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER" ACTUALLY IS:

    https://www.britannica.com/event/Bounty-System

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounty_jumper

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    5). HERE, CLASS ACTUALLY ADMITS TO SEEKING AND OBTAINING CONGRESSIONAL AIDE SIGNATURES AND DATE STAMPS ON HIS "FORGERY" (his homemade, FAKE "Private Attorney General 'Certificate'") IN FURTHERENCE OF THIS HOAX: https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._Two_Month.pdf (AT PAGE 2. PARA 2-4. PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO PARAGRAPH 4)

    https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._Two_Month.pdf (BEGINNING AT PAGE 2 PARA. 2.).
    https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/..._18TH_2013.pdf (at the 2nd full paragraph).

    6. FAKE "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" VEHICLES:

    http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/d...actant.159266/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=8s (Go to video FIRST. Then, go to :05-:20).

    NOTE: Class was previously CRIMINALLY CONVICTED for illegally installing a REAL police "blue light" on top of his FRAUDULENTLY MARKED vehicle (to make it LOOK like a law enforcement vehicle). Class was sentenced to A YEAR'S PROBATION for that CRIMINAL CONVICTION conditioned on him "not possessing any weapons" of any kind. Class was actually ON PROBATION for that CRIMINAL CONVICTION when he was arrested in D.C. (with "weapons" here), thereby constituting a VIOLATION OF HIS PROBATION in his North Carolina "blue light" case. But, North Carolina does not yet know this. Otherwise, Class would still be in prison.

    7. THE COURT EXPLAINS THE STATUTE THAT CLASS WAS CHARGED WITH VIOLATING ("An individual...may not CARRY...on the Grounds...of the Capitol Buildings...a DANGEROUS WEAPON...") AND THE COURT PROVIDES THE RELEVANT DEFINITION OF "FIREARM" FOR THE PURPOSES OF THAT SAME STATUTE ("The definition of firearm in this case is...ANY WEAPON...which is designed to or which will EXPEL A PROJECTILE BY ACTION OF AN EXPLOSIVE..."):

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40003 (SEE BOTH SECTIONS, AT 30% THROUGH THE TEXT and AT 65% THROUGH THE TEXT).

    Note how the truth at about 30% and at 65% through the text of this case squarely contradicts Class' FRAUDULENT claims to his followers about the charges against him and about the relevant statutory definition of a firearm in this case.

    8. CLASS VIOLATED HIS NORTH CAROLINA CONCEAL AND CARRY PERMIT BY TAKING HIS RIFLE AND THREE PISTOLS ONTO FEDERAL PROPERTY WHERE SUCH VIOLATED FEDERAL LAW.

    N.C.G.S. 14-415.11(C)(4). http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedL...14-415.11.html. (SEE PARA. 4).

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ANALYSIS:
    ROD CLASS (with his inability to read, his lack of education, his ignorance of the law, his delusional belief system, his worthless, amateur legal theories, his lack of honesty and his 100% failure rate in court) IS "LIVING PROOF" THAT THOSE WHO PRACTICE LAW (AND THOSE WHO TEACH THE LAW) SHOULD:
    1). BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE EDUCATION (a "Bachelor's Degree");
    2). BE REQUIRED TO ALSO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL THREE TO FOUR YEAR LAW SCHOOL EDUCATION (a "Juris Doctor's Degree");
    3). BE REQUIRED TO PASS THE STATE BAR EXAM (takes three days);
    4). BE REQUIRED TO UNDERGO A RIGOROUS STATE CHARACTER AND FITNESS BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION WHICH TAKES SEVERAL MONTHS OR YEARS (NO MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY, NO CRIMINAL HISTORY, honesty, credit history, interviews of employers, teachers, former co-workers, neighbors, relatives, taking finger print samples, taking hand writing samples, etc.).
    5). BE LICENSED BY THE STATE AND BE SUBJECT TO THE CONTINUOUS OVERSIGHT AND DISCIPLINE OF THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT, THE STATE SUPREME COURT (in order to protect the public from INCOMPETENCE and FRAUD).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 18th February 2018 at 20:56.

  8. Link to Post #8
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    16,271
    Thanks
    50,321
    Thanked 203,784 times in 14,685 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    Mod note from Bill:

    Thanks for all this, but you've posted (at this time!) 7 separate threads. As best we all know, there may be 20 more to come. This is almost (note: 'almost'!) spamming. I've merged them all into this one.

    Moreover, I don't know who Rod Class is, and my guess is that many other members and viewers might not, either.

    Best would have been for you to explain in your own words what the issues are here, rather than copying and pasting large tracts from other posts on the net that might be too specialized and detailed for most readers to focus on and read carefully.

    Summaries are helpful! This is not a personal criticism, at all: but I've simply got too much on my personal plate right now to read all this, and I'm almost sure I would just never get round to that. But a well-written, three paragraph summary would be genuinely helpful, and maybe interesting, to almost everyone. THX.
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 21st August 2017 at 17:31.

  9. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    anandacate (23rd August 2017), Hervé (21st August 2017), Kristin (21st August 2017), mgray (22nd August 2017), Satori (21st August 2017), selinam (5th March 2018)

  10. Link to Post #9
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 9: ROD CLASS & "THE SUPREME COURT LOVES MY PAPERWORK HOAX"

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://claimsoftheliving.blogspot.c...eme-court.html . http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=48361&cmd=tc (See Episode 1004, Dated 05-26-2017 and Episode 1006, Dated 08-12-2017).

    THE HOAX: Rod Class fraudulently claims that the Supreme Court is going to hear "his" case because his amateur "paperwork" was so good. But, this is not so.

    THE TRUTH: Rod Class has NOTHING to do with the Supreme Court hearing “his” case. Class is FRAUDULENTLY taking credit for the success OF HIS OWN ATTORNEYS in getting the Supreme Court to consider an entirely NEW legal question that Class NEVER knew about and NEVER raised anywhere at anytime.

    BACKGROUND: Amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL law that is actually used in the law and the legal system. So, amateur legal theories and the REAL law are the exact OPPOSITES of one another. Class does NOT use REAL law in his cases. Class ONLY uses amateur legal theories in his cases. This is why CLASS HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOVLED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE CASES IN A ROW AND STILL COUNTING). But, Class' attorneys (from arguably the best law firm in the country) do NOT use amateur legal theories in any of their cases. They ONLY use REAL law in all of their cases. This is why they win so many of their cases. The Supreme Court ONLY heard the REAL law presented by Class' attorneys (NOT by Class). The Supreme Court did NOT hear a single one of Class' amateur legal theories ("capital letters", "split personality" defense, "flesh and blood" person, "straw man", "yellow fringe" on the flag, etc.).

    BACKGROUND: Class was charged with "CARRYING" "DANGEROUS WEAPONS" in his vehicle onto "UNITED STATES CAPITOL GROUNDS", a FELONY. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40003.

    Class entered into a plea deal whereby he would plead GUILTY to the FELONY charge against him in exchange for the prosecutor recommending a light sentence to the judge. As part of the plea deal, CLASS WAIVED ("GAVE UP") HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL, first in the plea agreement itself and again in open court.

    Thereafter, Class realized that his GUILTY plea to a FELONY (in the plea deal) would make him ineligible for his conceal and carry permit from the State Of North Carolina (which does not allow CONVICTED FELONS to have such permits). So, Class VIOLATED the terms of his own plea agreement (in which he WAIVED his right to appeal) AND FILED AN APPEAL OF HIS CASE ANYWAY.

    In his appeal, Class raised a number of amateur legal theories. Class also MISTAKENLY claimed that the statute that he was convicted of violating HAD ALREADY BEEN DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL and he MISTAKENLY claimed that under the "full faith and credit" clause, he was authorized by his North Carolina conceal and carry permit him to "CARRY" handguns/firearms into Washington, D.C. AND onto United States Capitol grounds (which behavior, unknown to Class, ACTUALLY VIOLATED the terms his conceal and carry permit from that state). BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, CLASS NEVER KNEW TO RAISE (AND DID NOT RAISE) THE ISSUE OF WHETHER HE COULD FILE AN APPEAL OF HIS CASE IN THE FIRST PLACE (a right that he had TWICE unconditionally WAIVED, first in his plea deal and again in open court). THIS IS STILL THE ONLY ISSUE IN THE CASE AND THE ONLY ISSUE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT.

    The Court Of Appeals received Class' amateur appellate brief and the entire court file from the trial court below (which contained Class' PSYCHIATRIC records). Both PROVED that Class was ILLITERATE, UNEDUCATED and MENTALLY ILL. So, as the trial court had done below (with "STAND BY" counsel to represent Class), the Court Of Appeals ALSO hired, AT THE GOVERNMENT'S EXPENSE, a law firm to represent Class on appeal and ordered it, in writing, to "act on Class' behalf". Because Class wanted to represent himself on appeal, the Court of Appeals "humored" Class by calling the law firm that it hired to represent Class an "amicus curiae" ("friend of court"). But, the reality is that this law firm was under written court orders to represent Class as his law firm on appeal, regardless of the terminology used. Class' law firm DID NOT TAKE CLASS' CASE "FREE" AS A MATTER OF "PRINCIPLE". IT TOOK CLASS' CASE FOR THE MONEY! And, lucky for Class.

    Class' law firm immediately realized that Class had MISTAKENLY FAILED to raise the "THRESHOLD QUESTION" of WHETHER HE COULD EVEN FILE AN APPEAL OF HIS CASE IN THE FIRST PLACE (after TWICE waiving that right, in the plea agreement and again in open court). Without addressing and disposing of this legal issue, THERE WOULD BE NO APPEAL. But, Class did not know this. So, Class' law firm "COVERED" FOR HIS MISTAKE by raising this omitted legal issue for him (thereby saving the entire appeal). Unfortunately, the Court Of Appeals held that Class HAD WAIVED HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL. THIS IS STILL THE ONLY ISSUE IN THE CASE AND THE ONLY ISSUE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT.

    In response to this adverse ruling, Class' law firm ALONE filed an appeal to the Supreme Court. CLASS WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM (AND WILL NEVER BE SO INVOLVED). The SOLE QUESTION in this new appeal before the Supreme Court is WHETHER A PERSON (ANY PERSON) CAN FILE AN APPEAL OF A CASE challenging the constitutionality of a statute WHICH THEY HAVE ALREADY PLED GUILTY TO VIOLATING. THIS IS THE ONE AND ONLY ISSUE ON APPEAL BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT. See SECOND PAGE, MARKED PAGE "i", BOTTOM PARAGRAPH. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content...petitioner.pdf . THIS ISSUE IS A NEW LEGAL ARGUMENT THAT CLASS NEVER KNEW TO RAISE (AND DID NOT RAISE) ANYWHERE AT ANY TIME. Class' amateur legal theories ARE NOT NOW (AND WILL NEVER BE) BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER. ONLY REAL LAW CONCEIVED AND PRESENTED BY CLASS' LAW FIRM (NOT ROD CLASS) WILL BE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER.

    THE HOAX II: Class FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that the Court Of Appeals hired his law firm to represent him because his amateur "paperwork" WAS SO GOOD. Class also FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that his law firm and other interested parties who joined in the current appeal did so to "BACK UP" his amateur "paperwork". But, none of this so.

    THE TRUTH II: The Court Of Appeals hired Class' law firm to represent him because his amateur "paperwork" WAS SO BAD! Further, the Court Of Appeals HAD PROOF in its own files that Class was FUNCTIONALLY-ILLITERATE, UNEDUCATED AND MENTALLY ILL. FACT: COURTS DO NOT PROVIDE ATTORNEYS TO LITIGANTS WHO ARE CAPABLE OF REPRESENTING THEMSELVES. COURTS ONLY PROVIDE ATTORNEYS TO LITIGANTS WHO ARE INCAPABLE OF REPRESENTING THEMSELVES (as was the case here). Further, the other interested parties who joined in the current appeal DO NOT "BACK UP" Class' amateur "paperwork" either! Instead, they ONLY "BACK UP" CLASS' LAW FIRM IN ITS ENTIRELY SEPARATE LEGAL ARGUMENT WHICH CLASS NEVER KNEW ABOUT AND WHICH CLASS NEVER RAISED ANYWHERE AT ANYTIME.

    WHAT THOSE INVOLVED IN CLASS' CASE (AND CLASS' FOLLOWERS) DO NOT YET KNOW:

    1. Class WAS ACTUALLY ON PROBATION at the time of his ARREST in this case for a previous North Carolina CRIMINAL CONVICTION (which PROBATION was conditioned upon Class NOT POSSESSING ANY "WEAPONS" OF ANY KIND for a year ). Lincoln County [North Carolina] Gen. Ct. Of Justice, Dist. Ct. Div. Case No. 13CR050407. Thus, Class WAS IN ILLEGAL POSSESSION of "WEAPONS" at the time of his ARREST in this case (not even considering his additional violation of FEDERAL law). SO, CLASS WAS NOT A "LAW ABIDING CITIZEN" AT THE TIME OF HIS ARREST, as he fraudulently contends.

    2. Class SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD a conceal and carry permit from the state of North Carolina in the first place. This is because Class was ALREADY A CONVICTED FELON before applying for such a permit from that state (and that state DOES NOT issue such permits to CONVICTED FELONS). N.C.G.S. 14_415.12(b)(3). http://ncleg.net/gascripts/statutes/...tute=14-415.12 . Specifically, in 2001, Class was CONVICTED in Ohio of the FELONY POSSESSION (in his car) of a fully-loaded, ILLEGALLY-SAWED-OFF Springfield shotgun. Ct. of Common Pleas, Tuscarawas County, Ohio, Case No. 2001 CR 12 0298. Ironically, Class WAS ALSO ON PROBATION at the time of that FELONY ARREST for a previous Ohio gun-related CRIME (which constituted another PROBATION VIOLATION by Class). Canton [Ohio] Mun. Ct., Case No. 1999CRB05550). Regardless, Class DID NOT fit any exception to the conceal and carry statute and WAS NOT eligible for the "restoration" of his firearm rights (so as to be issued such a permit from that state). N.C.G.S. 14_415.4 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (j). http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislat..._14-415.4.html . Thus, Class apparently obtained his conceal and carry permit from North Carolina by FRAUD (itself a criminal act). N.C.G.S. 14_415.4(l) (this is an "L"). http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislat..._14-415.4.html. Further, the sentencing judge in this case DID NOT KNOW that Class was ALREADY a CONVICTED FELON at the time of sentencing (Class INTENTIONALLY OMITTED this fact from the pre-sentencing statement upon which the judge and prosecutor relied). Incredibly, Class was also ARRESTED AND JAILED TWO MORE TIMES during the pendency of this case, once for refusing to appear at his own trial and once for "resisting arrest" following a traffic stop.

    3. Unknown to Class, IT WAS ALSO ILLEGAL for him to have "CARRIED" handguns or firearms onto United States Capitol grounds UNDER HIS OWN CONCEAL AND CARRY PERMIT FROM THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. Unknown to Class, his permit from that state EXPRESSLY FORBADE CLASS FROM POSSESSING OR CARRYING HANDGUNS OR FIREARMS ON ANY FEDERAL PROPERTY WHERE, AS HERE, SUCH WEAPONS ARE NOT PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW. N.C.G.S. 14_415.11(C)(4). http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedL...14-415.11.html . So, contrary to Class' understanding, his having a North Carolina “conceal and carry” permit DID NOT constitute a "defense" to the federal charges against him in this case. Indeed, it constituted AN ADDITIONAL OFFENSE!

    4. Even if Class had a "second amendment" defense to "CARRYING" three loaded handguns and one fully loaded rifle onto United States Capitol grounds, Class HAD NO "SECOND AMENDMENT DEFENSE" to "CARRYING" THE OTHER "DANGEROUS WEAPONS" onto United States Capitol grounds WHICH WERE ALSO PROHIBITED BY THE SAME FEDERAL STATUTE (one machete, fourteen knives and daggers, one illegal switch blade, three axes, etc.).

    5. It is true that Class may not have realized that he had driven and parked his vehicle (loaded with "DANGEROUS WEAPONS") on United States Capitol grounds. Thus, Class may not have had "mens rea" (knowledge of wrongdoing) in connection with that prohibited act. But, Class DID HAVE "MENS REA" ABOUT BEING ON PROBATION AT THE TIME AND THAT HIS PROBATION MADE HIS POSSESSION OF ANY "WEAPON" AT THE TIME ILLEGAL.

    NOTE: None of the foregoing facts (in paragraphs 1-5) have yet been made known to any court or attorney in this case. Likewise, none of the courts, prosecutors or law enforcement officials in Ohio or in North Carolina are yet aware that Class INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED THE TERMS OF HIS PROBATION WITH THOSE RESPECTIVE STATES as explained above.

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 15th January 2018 at 00:58.

  11. Link to Post #10
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 10: ROD CLASS & THE "RIGHT TO TRAVEL HOAX" & THE "NO DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIRED HOAX"

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afCz8AjvYdY&t=421s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6SGIfO4ug4&t=69s

    THE HOAX I: Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that A PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER’S LICENSE TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE on the grounds that every person has a "RIGHT TO TRAVEL". Thus, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that the "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" is the same thing as the "RIGHT TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE". But, this is not so.

    THE TRUTH: The "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" is merely the JUDICIALLY-recognized RIGHT TO LEAVE ONE STATE AND TO ENTER ANOTHER STATE. It has NOTHING to do with "DRIVING" anything. Under the law, there is no such thing as a "RIGHT TO DRIVE" a motor vehicle. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know this.

    THE HOAX II: Further, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists point out that under FEDERAL law, A PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE to drive a motor vehicle UNLESS THAT PERSON IS ENGAGED IN "COMMERCE" AMONG ["BETWEEN"] THE "SEVERAL STATES" ("interstate commerce"), a narrow subject governed by FEDERAL law. See Const., Art. 1, Sec. 8 (listing ALL POWERS of Congress). http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/pa...le-i-section-8 . https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause.

    THE TRUTH: But, what Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know is that STATE LAW APPLIES TO THE SAME PERSON AT THE SAME TIME. This is because, under the tenth amendment, STATE LAW GOVERNS THE SUBJECT OF DRIVER'S LICENSES OUTSIDE THE NARROW FEDERAL CONTEXT OF "INTERSTATE COMMERCE" (IN ALL OTHER CONTEXTS). http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment. And, under STATE law, a person is required to have a driver’s license to drive a motor vehicle WHEN THAT PERSON IS NOT ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE". So, when BOTH FEDERAL law and STATE law are COMBINED AND APPLIED TO THE SAME PERSON AT THE SAME TIME, A PERSON IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A DRIVER’S LICENSE TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE IN ALL CONTEXTS, ALL THE TIME, NO MATTER WHAT (whether or not that person is engaged in "interstate commerce"). But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know this.

    NOTE: For a detailed explanation of just how irrelevant "COMMERCE" is to driver's license and traffic & transportation law, see the comment by Snoop4truth entitled "EDDIE CRAIG & THE "NO COMMERCE, NO DRIVER'S LICENSE NEEDED HOAX".

    THE LAW:

    1). OVER A CENTURY AGO, THE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT, in the absence of FEDERAL legislation on the subject, THE STATES HAD THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE ALL DRIVERS OF ALL MOTOR VEHICLES TO HAVE DRIVER'S LICENSES, WHETHER OR NOT THAT DRIVER WAS ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE".

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...en&as_sdt=4,60

    Since this decision, CONGRESS (in compliance with this decision and in compliance with Art. 1, Sec. 8, clause 3, U.S. Const.) passed “NATIONAL” (FEDERAL) FEDERAL legislation regulating ONLY those drivers WHO WERE ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE. Under the tenth amendment and under this decision, this reserved unto THE STATES the power to regulate ONLY those drivers WHO WERE “NOT” ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE". In this sense, FEDERAL law and STATE law are OPPOSITES of one another (FEDERAL law requires drivers of motor vehicles who ARE engaged in "interstate COMMERCE" to have driver's licenses and STATE law requires drivers of motor vehicles who ARE “NOT” engaged in "interstate COMMERCE" to have driver's licenses. EITHER WAY, A DRIVER'S LICENSE IS REQUIRED TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE.

    2). Under the tenth amendment, the STATES have the RIGHT to require driver's licenses of all drivers who are “NOT” ENGAGED IN "INTERSTATE COMMERCE" .

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...2&as_sdt=40006 .

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...2&as_sdt=40006

    3). THERE IS NO "RIGHT TO DRIVE".

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 . (NEAR THE END OF THE CASE)

    4). "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" DEFINED.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 . (SEE BOTH SECTIONS.).

    5). The "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" IS NOT ABOUT "DRIVING" ANYTHING.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...2&as_sdt=40006 .

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    6). State requirements for driver's licenses DO NOT VIOLATE THE "RIGHT TO TRAVEL".

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...2&as_sdt=40006 .

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    7). A person may freely exercise their "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" without "DRIVING" ANYTHING by walking, riding a bicycle or horse, or as a "PASSENGER" in an automobile, bus, airplane or helicopter.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    8). AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES ALWAYS LOSE.

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 .

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 . Note that this is the same person who stars in the 3 minute video below.

    9). WHAT ABOUT CASE LAW THAT AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS CITE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR HOAX? Ex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MZrB0TRFYI

    Amateur legal theorists ONLY CITE case law that says a person has a "RIGHT" to: a). "TRAVEL"; b). "USE THE ROADWAYS"; c). "LOCOMOTION"; d). "PASSAGE"; e). "FREE TRANSIT"; and f). "USE ORDINARY CONVEYANCES".

    Note that the word, "DRIVE" is conspicuously absent in all of these cases.

    But, amateur legal theorists DO NOT CITE case law that actually says that a person has a "RIGHT TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE" (because no such law exists) AND THOSE ARE THE ONLY WORDS THAT MATTER.

    3 MINUTE VIDEO.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

    SNOPES:
    http://m.snopes.com/supreme-court-ru...s-unnecessary/

    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 29th December 2017 at 17:09.

  12. Link to Post #11
    Morocco Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th December 2015
    Location
    Here, now
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    1,983
    Thanked 472 times in 112 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    Hi snoopfortruth, I have seen you post this wall of text on YouTube non step it seems. I've been researching this topic for years & it is of great interest to me. Also, I did read everything you posted, as well as the other comments on YouTube regarding Winston Shrout & others in the "sovereign/freeman" niche.

    I don't recall you ever expressing your opinion on any of the material being discussed in the videos or here on Avalon. It seems like you're trolling & have some sort of smear agenda. I'd love to be wrong.

    Can you share on this thread why you feel it is so important that word get out that these guys are scam artists & your opinions of the principles that these guys try to spread awareness of? Please elaborate..
    Last edited by Basho; 21st August 2017 at 17:59.
    ISness is my business..

  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Basho For This Post:

    ditting (22nd August 2017), Hervé (21st August 2017), Kristin (21st August 2017), marique3652 (28th August 2017)

  14. Link to Post #12
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 12: ROD CLASS & "THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION HOAX"
    (A.K.A. THE “28 U.S.C. § 3002 (15) (a) PROVES THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION HOAX”)

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
    https://www.scribd.com/document/2404...andum-Based-On (at the final sentence of the paragraph marked "35" at about 40% through the text);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (Rod Class' partner in the "Judge DALE HOAX" pretending to quote a NON-EXISTENT "Judge DALE" who claims all governments are "CORPORATIONS");
    http://blackeyenews.com/?p=272;
    http://investmentwatchblog.com/unite...constitutions/;
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/is...r-corporation/ (See footnote 4);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJCqVS52MCA;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qkRquYDkyQ.

    THE HOAX: Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists falsely claim that Title 28 U.S.C.§ 3002 (15) (a) “proves” that the "United States" is a “corporation”. But, this is not so.

    THE TRUTH: Title 28 section § 3002 merely provides definitions SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF A SINGLE FEDERAL CHAPTER (AND THOSE DEFINITIONS DO NOT APPLY TO ANY OTHER CHAPTER AND CANNOT BE USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER PURPOSE). This is why the VERY FIRST WORDS of Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 read, “As used in THIS chapter [and NOT other chapters or other purposes]... ." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 (See the VERY FIRST WORDS at the TOP of this section.).

    The SINGLE CHAPTER for which Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 provides definitions is the FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT (chapter 176). This SINGLE CHAPTER provides the "PROCEDURE" ONLY that the "United States" must follow when collecting certain debts. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3001.

    BACKGROUND: There are dozens and dozens of types of “corporations”, ONLY ONE TYPE OF WHICH is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT "CORPORATION" (the "bad kind"). All of the rest ARE NOT private, for-profit “corporations” (the "bad kind"). But, Rod Class does not know this. But, Rod Class does not know this.

    SO, WHAT IS A “FEDERAL CORPORATION”?
    A few of our federal agencies are structured as PUBLICLY-OWED, NON-PROFIT “federal corporations” (NO PROFITS, NO “PRIVATE OWNERS”, NO “STOCKHOLDERS”, etc.). In general, all of the federal agencies that are structured this way have two things in common, they all have their own customers (or their own source of revenue) and none of them are supposed to receive any money from Congress. Three well-known examples of such federal agencies are the United States Postal Service, AMTRAK and the Tennessee Valley Authority (a publicly-owned, non-profit ELECTRICAL POWER utility). You will note that ALL THREE of these PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT “federal corporations” have their own customers and none of them are supposed to receive any money from Congress. There are THREE MAIN REASONS that the federal government structured such federal agencies as PUBLICLY-OWNED, NON-PROFIT “federal corporations”: 1). To force each such federal agency to work within their own budgets BY USING THEIR OWN REVENUES (received from their own customers/sources) rather than depending on money from Congress; 2). To relieve taxpayers of the burden of paying for governmental services that they might not even use (ex: not everyone uses snail mail, rides trains or lives in the "Tennessee Valley"): and 3). To ensure that each such federal agency provide the highest possible quality of service at the lowest possible cost to the taxpayer in order to avoid their own failure and collapse (which, due to this structure, would have no adverse effect on the taxpayer anyway). It's all about fairness to the taxpayer.

    SO, WHAT DOES THIS DEFINITION IN TITLE 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (15) (a) ACTUALLY MEAN?
    The Fair Debt Collection Procedure Act requires the "United States" to follow certain "PROCEDURE" when collecting certain debts. And, SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF THAT "PROCEDURE" ONLY, Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15 (a) defines the "United States" to "INCLUDE", among other things, all its "federal corporations". So, if AMTRAK (a "federal corporation") sought to collect on such a debt, it would have to follow the same "PROCEDURE" set forth in the Fair Debt Collection Procedure Act that any other part of the "United States" government have to follow. It's that simple. But, Rod Class does not know this.

    CONCLUSION: Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (15) (a) DOES NOT define the "United States" as a ”federal corporation”. Instead, it defines a “federal corporation” (like AMTRAK) as the “United States” SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF THE FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT. Certainly, this definition IN THE FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT does not mean that the entire federal government itself is a “private, for-profit corporation” (the "bad kind"). But, consider this. Even if the "United States" was such a "corporation", and it is not, all of the governmental decisions made by that alleged "corporation" WOULD STILL BE MADE BY PEOPLE THAT WE ELECT TO RUN IT and their appointees.

    THE LAW ON TITLE 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15)(a):

    1. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (at footnote 2 at the very end of the case).

    2. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (also addresses sovereign citizen, natural person, superior claim and right to the judgment, UCC, right to travel, sovereign & foreign state immunities, capital letters, de facto governments).

    3. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (at fn.18) (also addresses maritime & admiralty jurisdiction, consent, "stand[ing] under" the court's questions, "his government name", filing a counterclaim is a criminal case, challenging grand jury array, disqualifying a judge for a "personal interest" in case & for practicing law, right to be represented by a non-lawyer, "attorney in fact", right to self-representation).

    4. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (also addresses putting property into other names to avoid a debt, whether IRS tax laws apply outside D.C. & federal territories, whether wages are "income", sovereign and foreign state immunities, denying citizenship, IRS foreclosing on property put into another name).

    5. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (also addresses U.S. jurisdiction outside borders of D.C., the Act of 1871, whether U.S. is foreign state, the 11th amendment, whether the professional title, "esquire" (a servant of a knight in battle) is a title of "NOBILITY" (a HEREDITARY title for those BORN OF "NOBLE" BLOOD), whether use of the professional title, "esquire" converts American attorneys into agents of a foreign government, whether the "bar association" is a monopoly, whether certain federal statutes were enacted into positive law, whether judges really have a financial interest in their cases).

    6. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    7. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (also addresses "absolute judicial immunity", filing fraudulent lien against a judge, 11th amendment immunity, whether a government officer/official can be personally liable for official actions taken under color of law, "absolute prosecutorial immunity", "absolute [government] official immunity", whether a county is a "commercial entity engaged in commerce").

    8. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (SEE ALL THREE SECTIONS) (also addresses "capital letters", "flesh and blood persons", the "name game" ("split personality" & "corporate fiction" defenses) and whether the IRS is a Puerto Rican corporation).

    9. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (also addresses whether law only applies to governments& not to humans, whether there are two different constitutions, whether gold and silver are the only lawful money, whether gold fringe on the American flag in court converts the court into an admiralty or military court, birth certificate bond, straw man, whether "the people, not the government, are sovereign", affect of not being a "party or signatory to any law" & whether such a person is "exempt from all laws except those to which he voluntarily assents").

    EXCELLENT LINKS:
    http://pseudolaw.com/is-united-state...it-corporation
    http://internettheories.blogspot.com...tates-inc.html
    https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL30365.pdfUNITED STATES


    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 23rd January 2018 at 21:35.

  15. Link to Post #13
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 13: PART I: ROD CLASS & "SEVENTH GRADE CIVICS EXPLAINED"

    Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists are unable to distinguish between PLURAL terms and SINGULAR terms. This inability results in much of their confusion about the law. In a republican form of government, such as ours, "WE" (a PLURAL term) the "PEOPLE" (also a PLURAL term) exercise our power and control over our own government COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY). But, as INDIVIDUALS, we exercise no such power or control. In a republican form of government, such as ours, the authority of a government depends on the COLLECTIVE (not INDIVIDUAL) "consent" of the "governed" (a PLURAL term). But, as INDIVIDUALS, our "consent" to our government, its jurisdiction or to our laws IS NOT REQUIRED. (See links below.).

    CIVICS: In a republican form of government such as ours, there are THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT. This prevents tyranny from any single branch of government. This legal principle is called the "SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE" which is found in the constitution of every state and in the constitution of the United States. Our three branches of government are the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch (the ELECTED statutory law makers), the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch (the ELECTED law enforcement officials and their appointees) and the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch (the ELECTED judges, the ELECTED prosecutors and the ELECTED public defenders of the courts). Through the ELECTION process, "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) control ALL THREE BRANCHES of our own government. But, as INDIVIDUALS, we have no such control.

    In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our state statutes, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT ELECTED state LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVES to change or repeal the state statutes that we do not like. This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED LEGISLATORS (our SENATORS and CONGRESS MEN & WOMEN) as well as our locally ELECTED law/ordinance makers (county commissioners, city commissioners and city council members, etc.).

    In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state law enforcement officials, their appointees or their practices, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT state ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to change the appointees and/or practices that we do not like (different Governor, different County Sheriffs, different City Police Chiefs, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED law enforcement officer (our PRESIDENT ).

    In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state judges, their practices or their rulings , then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT different ELECTED state JUDGES (different Supreme Court Justices, different appellate judges, different circuit judges, different county judges, different city judges, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with respect to our ELECTED state prosecutors (state attorneys and district attorneys) and our ELECTED state public defenders. NOTE: In the federal courts, judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, both of which are ELECTED by "We the People". But, those ELECTED representatives of "We the People" (who do the nominating and confirming of our federal judges) can be removed from office by the ELECTION process as well. The ELECTED President also appoints the federal prosecutors. But, the President can be removed from office by the ELECTION process too. Some state jurisdictions even use a combination of BOTH systems whereby judges are first APPOINTED to the bench by ELECTED representatives of "We the People", but then must withstand a "retention" vote by "We the People" every single ELECTION cycle thereafter in order to remain on the bench.

    Regardless, EVERY single person in EVERY single branch of our STATE and FEDERAL government is put into office DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY by "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

    The fundamental mistake made by ALL AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS is their inability to comprehend the difference between the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute) and the ABSENCE of power of the SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (which is almost nothing) when opposing the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute). Every single amateur legal theory ever promoted reflects a basic misunderstanding of this simple legal principle, "THE MAJORITY RULES and the INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT." All amateur legal theorists get this simple legal principle exactly BACKWARDS (or OPPOSITE) to what the law really is (a common problem in amateur legal theory).

    It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW MAKERS to pass our state statutes and to make them binding upon all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

    It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to ticket, arrest and charge any INDIVIDUAL in the state who violates our state statutes without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

    It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state JUDGES to preside over state court proceedings of such an INDIVIDUAL without that INDIVIDUAL’S "consent" (“contractual or otherwise”).

    This means that in a republican form of government such as ours, an INDIVIDUAL'S "consent” (“contractual” or otherwise) is NOT REQUIRED in such matters. But, even if some type of "consent" was required in such matters (and it is not), then in a republican form of government such as ours, THAT “CONSENT” WOULD COME FROM “WE THE PEOPLE” COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, NOT FROM THE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL OUTSIDE THE ELECTION PROCESS.

    THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ALREADY HAVE THE COLLECTIVE “CONSENT” OF “WE THE PEOPLE” TO MAKE OUR LAW, TO ENFORCE OUR LAW AND TO PUNISH FOR VIOLATIONS OF OUR LAW.

    Under our federal and state constitutions, OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT DO NOT ALSO NEED THE INDIVIDUAL “CONSENT” OF ANY INDIVIDUAL TO CARRY OUT THOSE FUNCTIONS.

    So, every single legal burden placed on the INDIVIDUAL in a republican form of government such as ours is a legal burden that is placed upon the INDIVIDUAL directly or indirectly by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

    In a republican form of government such as ours, the power of the INDIVIDUAL is limited to VOTING, RUNNING FOR OFFICE and to enforcing what few INDIVIDUAL rights and protections that "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) allow the INDIVIDUAL to have (such as those INDIVIDUAL rights and protections listed in the Bill Of Rights). In a republican form of government such as ours, these INDIVIDUAL rights and protections of the INDIVIDUAL are determined by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (NOT BY THE INDIVIDUAL). This is why in a republican form of government, such as ours, ELECTIONS ARE SO IMPORTANT. In a republican form of government such as ours, ELECTIONS (which reflect the will of the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY) DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CONTROL EVERYTHING ABOUT OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. THESE ELECTIONS DETERMINE WHAT OUR LAWS ARE, WHO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ARE, WHO OUR JUDGES ARE, WHO OUR PROSECUTORS ARE, WHO OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE AND THEY DETERMINE WHAT ANY DESIRED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS OR REPEALS MIGHT BE.

    FACT: THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR STATUTES VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR COURTS VALID, OUR JUDGES VALID, OUR PROSECUTORS VALID AND OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS VALID.

    FACT: In a republican form of government such as ours, every conviction of a single INDIVIDUAL involves the efforts of ALL THREE ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT (the ELECTED LAW MAKERS who write the statutes, the ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS whose appointees make the arrests and who file the charges, the ELECTED JUDGES who preside over proceedings in court AND the ELECTED PROSECUTORS who attempt to convict the statutory violators in court). In a republican form of government such as ours, NO SINGLE ELECTED BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT CAN CONVICT AN INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT THE PARTICIPATION OF THE OTHER TWO ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT.

    FACT: The people who oppose, defy and seek the overthrow our ELECTED government, our ELECTED legislatures, our ELECTED executive (law enforcement) officials, our ELECTED judges, our ELECTED prosecutors and our ELECTED public defenders ACTUALLY OPPOSE, DEFY AND SEEK THE OVERTHROW OF OUR REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT ITSELF and in so doing, SEEK TO OVERTHROW THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY OF "WE THE PEOPLE" OURSELVES. This desire to overthrow our ELECTED republican form of government and the will of the majority of "We the People " COLLECTIVELY, along with his long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and his MULTIPLE weapons-related FELONIES are the reasons that Rod Class, has been placed on the United States "TERRORIST WATCH LIST".

    LINKS:

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006 (SEE HIGHLIGHTED TEXT.).

    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/con...f-the-governed

    PART II: ROD CLASS & "THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MYTH EXPLAINED”

    (CONTINUED FROM "ROD CLASS & SEVENTH GRADE CIVICS EXPLAINED". PLEASE READ THAT COMMENT FIRST.)

    Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that a "SOVEREIGN" is an INDIVIDUAL and that the enemy of a "SOVEREIGN" is the GOVERNMENT of the state and all of the individuals in the state. But, this is not so. The government of the state and all of the individuals in the state IS THE "SOVEREIGN". The INDIVIDUAL IS NOT. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know this. They get it EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) to what the truth actually is (a common problem in amateur legal theory).

    Thus, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ACTUALLY OPPOSE THE VERY "SOVEREIGN" AND THE VERY "SOVEREIGNTY" THAT THEY CLAIM TO SUPPORT. This means that Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ARE ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of the "SOVEREIGN" and ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of "SOVEREIGNTY", not their supporters. But, they do not know enough to realize this. This is why many such amateur legal theorists (like Rod Class) find themselves on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST (because they actually oppose the "SOVEREIGN" and because they actually oppose "SOVEREIGNTY").

    This fundamental mistake (the belief that the INDIVIDUAL is "SOVEREIGN") reflects that the terms, "SOVEREIGN" and "SOVEREIGNTY" are perhaps the single most misused and misunderstood terms in all of amateur legal theory.

    BACKGROUND: Originally in politics, a "SOVEREIGN" was a SINGLE "MONARCH" (King or Queen) GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE who GOVERNED a nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the nation state. Originally, the RIGHT of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN its own nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE was that MONARCH's right of "SOVEREIGNTY".

    Then and now, a "SOVEREIGN" meant/means a "GOVERNMENT" OF ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state. Then and now, "SOVEREIGNTY," meant/means that GOVERNMENT’S RIGHT TO GOVERN ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE.

    THE STATES: But, here in the United States, we rejected the notion of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state. Here in our country, we adopted a republican form of government whereby "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) GOVERNED our own states and all of the INDIVIDUALS in our own state COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) through our ELECTED representatives of our own STATE.

    So, here in our country, THE STATE ITSELF, which consists of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) became "SOVEREIGN" (which still means THE GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). This means that in our country THE STATE ITSELF legally stands in the shoes of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear. So, in our country, THE STATE ITSELF GOVERNS the STATE and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state (instead of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear). But, the right, power and authority of THE STATE ITSELF as a "SOVEREIGN" and the right, power and authority of the MONARCH of yesteryear as a "SOVEREIGN" ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. In our country, a "SOVEREIGN" IS STILL A "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE, but a "SOVEREIGN" is no longer a SINGLE MONARCH.

    THE BOTTOM LINE: Thus, In our country, the term, "SOVEREIGN" is a term THAT ONLY APPLIES TO A GOVERNMENT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" COLLECTIVELY (AS A WHOLE) AND NOT TO A SINGLE "CITIZEN", INDIVIDUAL OR PERSON INDIVIDUALLY. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to realize this. They get it EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) to what the truth actually is.

    Here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE. So, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). As a result, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL does not GOVERN the STATE or any of the INDIVIDUALS in the state.

    THE UNITED STATES: The United States ITSELF is also a SOVEREIGN nation state consisting of a union of MEMBER SOVEREIGN STATES. So, here in the United States, THE STATES and the United States are both "SOVEREIGN" GOVERNMENTAL HEADS OF STATE (WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS AS DIFFERENTIATED BY SUBJECT MATTER IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION).

    This means that here in the United States, THE STATE AND THE UNITED STATES OCCUPY THE SAME EXACT LEGAL POSITION (AND HAVE THE SAME LEGAL RIGHT, POWER AND AUTHORITY TO GOVERN THE STATE AND ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE STATE) AS DID THE SINGLE MONARCH OF YESTERYEAR, except that the powers of the United States (as distinguished from the individual STATES) are limited to those powers expressly delegated to it in the United States Constitution (a tiny list of subjects), whereas the powers of the individual STATES (as distinguished from the United States) have no such limitation.

    Here in the United States, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" COLLECTIVELY (NOT INDIVIDUALLY) through our VOTES. ---Thomas Jefferson (see below). Thus, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" through our ELECTIONS.

    But, as INDIVIDUALS, none of us are “SOVEREIGN” (which still means the GOVERNMENT of a state) and as INDIVIDUALS, none of us can exercise any "SOVEREIGNTY" (which still means the right to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state). In our country, we no longer recognize a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (or “MONARCH”) as “SOVEREIGN”. In our country, no single INDIVIDUAL is the GOVERNMENT OF A STATE. This is why, in our country, no INDIVIDUAL can be "SOVEREIGN" (WHICH STILL MEANS A GOVERNMENT OF A STATE).

    APPLICATION: This is why every amateur legal theorist who claims to be "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE) always LOSES on that issue with law enforcement officers and in court. This is why all law enforcement officers and all courts always treat such amateur legal theorists as the mere INDIVIDUALS that they really are. Amateur legal theorists who claim to be "SOVEREIGN" (a government of a state) to law enforcement officers and in court do nothing but demonstrate their IGNORANCE of the law and their IGNORANCE of history--- AND THEY ALWAYS LOSE!

    WHAT YOU CAN DO: If you do not like the laws, the ELECTED legislators, the ELECTED executive officers or the ELECTED judges or the ELECTED prosecutors, then do something about it. VOTE OR RUN FOR OFFICE. Pretending to be an INDIVIDUAL, GOVERNMENT OF A STATE (a “SOVEREIGN” MONARCH) has never, and will never work for you as a “defense” to the application of any law, the jurisdiction of any law enforcement officer or court or to the consequences any arrest, charge or conviction.

    CONCLUSION: IN OUR COUNTRY, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" (OR OTHERWISE "SOVEREIGN"). HERE, AND ELSEWHERE, ONLY A GOVERNMENT CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN". So, in our country, an INDIVIDUAL cannot "get his SOVEREIGNTY back". This is because, In our country, NO INDIVIDUAL WAS EVER "SOVEREIGN" IN THE FIRST PLACE.

    DEFINITION:

    http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/Sovereign.aspx

    http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/d...lish/sovereign

    THE LAW:

    1. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    2. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    3. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    4. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    5. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006



    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 29th December 2017 at 17:11.

  16. Link to Post #14
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    Bill,

    Thank you for your kind words and for your timely correction. I am new to posting comments on your website. So, if I am posting my comments incorrectly (by posting them as separate threads), then I apologize. It was not my intent to break the rules or to violate policy.

    I thought that each one of my comments should be posted as a separate thread because each comment addresses an entirely separate Rod Class hoax (an entirely separate subject).

    I also thought that by posting each one of my comments as a separate thread, then those followers of Rod Class doing research on a particular Rod Class claim (or hoax) would be able to find my comment (my research) much, much easier (because I used Rod Class' own words in the title of each separate comment and those words would likely be the same words used by those doing research on Rod Class' claims).

    The original titles to my comments may explain why you were getting so many hits on them in such a short amount of time (these individual titles make sense to those doing research on specific Rod Class claims). But, that trend may not continue under a single title like "many hoaxes". Regardless, if have done something incorrect (by posting each of my comments under a new thread), then I sincerely apologize.

    From now on, should I post my "Rod Class" comments as "replies" to the previous comment of mine?

    I do not have 20 more comments prepared to post. I may have one or two more prepared.

    My intent is not to spam you or your website. My intent is to reduce the damage that Rod Class' hoaxes cause the American people every single day. I do not know of any other way to reduce that damage except to show proof that EACH one of his claims are simply hoaxes.

    Rod Class is a pseudo-legal "guru" with a following in the "sovereign citizen" (anti-government) movement. He holds himself out as a legal expert. But, he is not. His goal is to incite hatred and violence against all authority figures, including law enforcement, lawyers, the courts and the legal system. You may not know who Rod Class is. But, his followers do know who he is (as demonstrated by the large number of hits that these comments have already gotten in a very short amount of time they have been posted).

    Everything that I have posted on your website (except for the links) are my own words. Nothing of what I have posted are the cut and pasted words of others (except for the links). Indeed, I even provided the highlighting in the text of the case law to which I linked in my comments. So, even the links inside my comments reflect my original work. I am many things, but a plagiarizer is not one of them.

    While my posts are longer than most, they are as short as I can make them and still include the links and other information necessary to debunk the hoax being debunked therein. Please note that almost every comment of mine begins with a one or two sentence description of the hoax and a one or two sentence explanation debunking the hoax. So, each comment includes a summary at the very beginning. But, I agree with you. Your point about brevity is well-taken.

    If there is anything else that I might do to improve my work, please let me know.

    Best Regards,
    Snoop

  17. Link to Post #15
    Moderator Kristin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,416
    Thanks
    14,391
    Thanked 13,153 times in 2,337 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    Snoop,

    I just sent you a PM about this, however, you have explained this admirably here. Thank you.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kristin For This Post:

    Basho (22nd August 2017), Bill Ryan (21st August 2017)

  19. Link to Post #16
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    16,271
    Thanks
    50,321
    Thanked 203,784 times in 14,685 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    Quote Posted by snoop4truth (here)
    From now on, should I post my "Rod Class" comments as "replies" to the previous comment of mine?
    Yes, please do. You don't have to quote yourself... just enter new text in the 'Quick Reply' box below.

    There's a thread here about Sean David Morton, who (by coaching people on this stuff and charging for it) not only ripped a bunch of people off — and got some in to serious trouble — but was convicted on a bunch of counts and, if he'd turned up for his sentencing, would have been put away for over 8 years.
    Also this thread:

  20. Link to Post #17
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    Hello Basho,
    Thank you for your timely reply. It is very good to hear from you. I am glad to hear that you have read my work. I put a lot of effort into it.

    Yes. I have posted similar comments on YouTube.

    Yes. The subject of the law and legal hoaxes is of great interest to me too. So, we have that in common.

    Actually, I have posted comments on Avalon before. But, not in this number.

    I am not a troll. I am a truther. I have an agenda. It is to tell the truth and to expose hoaxes. Some regard me telling the truth and exposing hoaxes as bad things for me to do. But, I regard those things as good things for me to do. I believe that truth deserves equal editorial space to the lies that are posted online. As you know, there are hundreds (perhaps thousands) of lies about the law posted online. I could post forever and never equal the number of lies posted online. Regardless, that is why I post what I do.

    I regard deliberately lying to the American people about their law and their legal system as an act of treason against the American people. I regard a person manufacturing and marketing an elaborate hoax (like the "Judge DALE Hoax") as committing a deliberate attack upon the American people. I will respond to such an attack with an attack of my own. That is why I post what I post.

    As to your final question, here are my thoughts. If Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists were REALLY spreading "AWARENESS", I would be their biggest supporter. But, they are not. They are spreading lies, fraud and hoaxes. That is not "awareness".

    Not every amateur legal theorist realizes that the information they peddle is a lie, a fraud or a hoax. Many of them obtained their bad information from others who they trusted and who they believed. But, Rod Class is not one them.

    What sets Rodney DALE Class apart from all other amateur legal theorists is that he KNOWS that the information he peddles is a lie, a fraud and a hoax. Why? Because he is the original source of the lie, the fraud and the hoax that he peddles (not somebody else).

    The "Judge DALE Hoax" is a classic example. This hoax fooled thousands of victims. Rodney DALE Class did not "accidently" write and publish the "Judge DALE forgeries". This was a scheme that he invested years in pulling off. This was a scheme that had no purpose except to defraud and to dupe the American people. This scheme had no purpose except to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED government of "We the People".

    The Bible says that the only way to truly judge a man is by his deeds (not by his words). Motivational posters say that every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it (demonstrating what kind of person he or she is). What do Rod Class' deeds (in creating and peddling the "Judge DALE Hoax") say about him? What does Rod Class' job (in creating and peddling the "Judge DALE Hoax") say about him? They say that Rod Class is a hopeless, chronic, habitual, pathological liar with no conscience whatsoever and no moral compass whatsoever. They say that it is infinitely more important to Rod Class to incite hatred and violence against his perceived enemies than to simply tell his followers the truth. That shows how little value Class places on the truth.

    Now, I ask you, who loses in such a scheme? Rod Class? No. Rod Class benefits by lying and defrauding his followers. Only his followers lose in such a scheme. Only the American people lose in such a scheme. It is those people that I am trying to help by simply telling them the truth about Class' false claims.

    That is why I do what I do.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 30th December 2017 at 16:08.

  21. Link to Post #18
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 18: ROD CLASS & THE "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES ARE NOT MONEY HOAX" (A.K.A. THE HAROLD STANLEY HOAX")

    FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCisCCMQqng&t=610s .

    BACKGROUND:
    Rod Class unsuccessfully attempts to "represent" other people in court in his imaginary capacity as a "Private Attorney General" and as a "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter" (see comments on these two subjects elsewhere on this website). But, no court has ever allowed him to do this. In truth, all Class actually does for these people IS LOSE THEIR CASE FOR THEM (as he did in this case).

    THE HOAX:
    In BRAGGING about LOSING Harold Stanley's case. Class BRAGS that he testified in court that "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES ARE NOT MONEY". Class falsely claims that he LOST Harold Stanley's case because the judge excluded (or later "struck") that "EVIDENCE". Further, Class falsely claims that when the judge excluded (or "struck") that "EVIDENCE", that ruling constituted the “crime” of suppressing or withholding exculpatory “EVIDENCE”. So, Class (in his imaginary capacity as a "Private Attorney General") purported to sue the judge, the prosecutors and others on behalf of Stanley for this imaginary "crime".

    THE TRUTH:
    Class did not know then (and does not know now) that SUCH TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENTS: 1). ARE NOT "EVIDENCE" in the first place (they are "ARGUMENT"); 2). WERE NOT LEGALLY “RELEVANT” (to the actual claims or defenses of the parties); and 3). WERE LEGALLY ERRONEOUS (opposite to what the law actually is/was). MOST IMPORTANTLY, CLASS DID NOT KNOW THEN AND DOES NOW KNOW NOW THAT THIS TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENT HAS BEEN PUTTING TAX PROTESTERS IN PRISON FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS.

    ROD CLASS' AMATEUR MISTAKES WHICH SENT HAROLD STANLEY TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR 5 to 8 YEARS!

    1. MISTAKE 1- Class had no idea what Harold Stanley’s case was actually about. Class mistakenly believed that Stanley’s case was about the IRS claiming that Stanley owed income taxes to the IRS. (But, it was not.). So, Class mistakenly set out to prove that Stanley did not owe income taxes to the IRS (something that, unknown to Class, was completely IRRELEVANT to Stanley’s case).

    In order to prove that Stanley did not owe income taxes to the IRS (something that, unknown to Class, was completely IRRELEVANT to Stanley’s case), Class claimed that he testified (or sought to testify) that "Federal Reserve Notes ("FRNs") are not money".

    NOTE: The “reasoning” behind this particular tax protester argument is that if "FRNs are not money", then a tax protester (like Stanley) who is paid in the form of “FRNs” can argue that he did not receive any “MONEY” and therefore incurred no "INCOME" tax liability to the IRS. Further, if “FRNs are not money”, then it would be “impossible” for a tax protester (like Stanley) to “PAY” any "INCOME" taxes to the IRS since all he/she has to “PAY” "INCOME" taxes with are FRNs which “are not money” making true “PAYMENT” of income taxes “impossible”, etc.

    To make matters worse, Class could not understand why Harold Stanley's case was filed in the Federal Court For The Western District of Missouri, instead of being filed in a "Tax Court" (where Class usually LOSES his IRS cases). Class even erroneously claimed that the district court "did not have jurisdiction" over Stanley’s case because the case was filed in the “wrong court”. But, this was not so.

    Unknown to Class, the reason that this case was filed in in federal district court was that the United States DID NOT merely charge Stanley with not paying income taxes (in which event, the case would have been filed in "Tax Court", where Class usually LOSES his IRS cases). Instead, in this case, the United States charged Stanley with federal CRIMES which can only be filed in federal district court (not in "Tax Court" where Class usually LOSES his IRS cases). Specifically, in this case, the United States charged Stanley with: SUBMITTING FAKE MONEY ORDERS TO THE IRS; SUBMITTING FALSE DOCUMENTS TO THE IRS FALSELY INDICATING THAT HIS TAX DEBTS WERE "SATISFIED" BECAUSE THEY HAD BEEN "ACCEPTED FOR VALUE"; SUBMITTING FAKE PAYMENT VOUCHERS TO THE IRS WITHOUT SUBMITTING THE PAYMENT "VOUCHED" FOR and SUBMITTING A FALSE COMPLAINT TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FALSELY ACCUSING THE IRS OF A CRIME (something that Class likely had a hand in himself).

    This means that even if Class had been allowed to testify that “FRNs are not money” (and even if that testimony had been legally correct, and it was not), STANLEY WOULD HAVE STILL BEEN CONVICTING OF SUBMITTING FAKE MONEY ORDERS TO THE IRS, SUBMITTING FALSE DOCUMENTS TO THE IRS FALSELY INDICATING THAT HIS TAX DEBTS WERE PAID, SUBMITTING FAKE PAYMENT VOUCHERS TO THE IRS WITHOUT SUBMITTING THE PAYMENT “VOUCHED” FOR AND FILING A FALSE COMPLAINT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES, ETC. This is because whether or not FRNs are "money" has no bearing whatsoever ON WHETHER HAROLD STANLEY SUBMITTED FAKE MONEY ORDERS TO THE IRS, WHETHER HE SUBMITTED FALSE DOCUMENTS TO THE IRS FALSELY INDICATING THAT TAX DEBTS WERE PAID, WHETHER HE SUBMITTED FAKE PAYMENT “VOUCHERS” TO THE IRS WITHOUT SUBMITTING THE PAYMENT “VOUCHED” FOR OR WHETHER HE FILED A FALSE COMPLAINT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES.

    So, Class’ proffered testimony about FRNs was NOT LEGALLY ”RELEVANT” to the ACTUAL claims and defenses of the parties and was therefore legally “INADMISSIBLE” under the Federal Rules of Evidence and the judge PROPERLY EXCLUDED IT. But, Class does not know ANY of this.

    2. MISTAKE 2- Unknown to Class, TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENTS ARE NOT “EVIDENCE” IN THE FIRST PLACE (they are "ARGUMENT").

    "FACTS" are "EVENTS" that can be "WITNESSED". But, AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENTS and the "LAW" ARE NOT "EVENTS" that can be "WITNESSED".

    "FACT WITNESSES" (of the type that Class was in this case) can ONLY testify as to RELEVANT “EVENTS” that they actually "WITNESSED" (ex: "I saw him crawl out the window."). But, “FACT WITNESSES”, of the type that Class was in this case, cannot testify as to “OPINIONS”, the “LAW” or “LEGAL ARGUMENTS OR CONCLUSIONS” about the “LAW” (because those things are not “EVENTS” that Class actually "WITNESSED"). But, Class does not know ANY of this.

    ALL APPLICABLE “LAW” IS ALWAYS PRESENTED TO THE JURY IN EVERY SINGLE JURY TRIAL, AS IT WAS IN THIS CASE. But, such “LAW” is not presented to the jury by mere “FACT WITNESSES” of the type that Rod Class was in this case. It is the JUDGE who presents all applicable “LAW” to the jury in all jury trials (meaning “LAW” that actually relates to the claims and/or defenses of the parties). But, Class does not know any of this.

    Further, it is the attorneys at law or the pro se parties themselves who make all legal ARGUMENTS (like tax protester ARGUMENTS) to the jury, not mere “FACT WITNESSES” of the type that Rod Class was in this case. Because legal theories, legal arguments and legal conclusions are NOT "EVENTS" that Class actually "WITNESSED", the judge properly "excluded" or "struck" Class' proffered testimony about FRNs. But, Class does not know ANY of this.

    3. MISTAKE 3- Unknown to Class, under the law itself, FRNs ARE MONEY! (See links below.). This means that Class was so ignorant of the law that he did not even know then, and does not know now that his "excluded" or "stricken" and ERRONEOUS "testimony" about FRNs WAS EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) TO WHAT THE LAW ACTUALLY WAS! But, Class does not know ANY of this.

    THE LAW: "FRNs ARE NOT MONEY" IN THE TAX PROTESTER CONTEXT:

    1. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    2. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...2&as_sdt=40006

    3. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_c...2&as_sdt=40006

    4. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    THE LAW: "FRNs ARE NOT MONEY" OUTSIDE THE TAX PROTESTER CONTEXT.

    5. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    6. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...n&as_sdt=40006

    7. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...2&as_sdt=40006

    8. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...2&as_sdt=40006


    ABOUT ROD CLASS:
    Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

    Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' or 'Private Contractors' Hoax" (A.K.A. the "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax"), "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The United States is a Corporation Hoax" (A.K.A. "Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax"), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (A.K.A. The "C.R.I.S. Hoax"), the "Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 29th December 2017 at 17:12.

  22. Link to Post #19
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    COMMENT 19: “THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX”
    THIS IS A WORLD FAMOUS HOAX BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER IN THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX" AND SEVERAL OTHER ROD CLASS HOAXES". READ IT. IT IS SIMPLY UNBELIEVABLE!

    FIRST, SEE HOAX HERE.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22N...w=1366&bih=651
    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22N...w=1366&bih=651
    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/290622982177625257/

    OSCAR WORTHY VIDEO PERFORMANCES (Note: Jeff Rense is not involved in this hoax. Indeed, he is a victim of this hoax.):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5vLuGPV-lU
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrzEwYlb5CU
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXSqgD1KjdY (at 43:30-44:20, 46:00-46:55);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfG9zljgFh0 (at 7:35-8:00);
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc8U...LK7aGdoz08UWiF
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuGL...LK7aGdoz08UWiF
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVx...F&index=3&t=0s

    THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT (AS MODIFIED BY THE PROMOTER'S CO-CONSPIRATOR IN THIS HOAX):
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/nas...tureof-war.pdf
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk4hfIVIoT4


    THE HOAX:
    The promoter of this hoax falsely claims that the “NASA War Document” is a “secret” government document that was "discovered" and "downloaded" (or “leaked”) from a “NASA website” which she claims proves that NASA and/or the United States government are developing and using terrifying, horrific, futuristic, high-tech weapons AGAINST the American people. But, these claims are not so.

    THE TRUTH:
    The “NASA War Document” is NOT what promoter claims it is, was NEVER on a NASA website, was NEVER “secret” and does NOT reflect existing or future high-tech weapons that NASA and/or the United States government are developing or using AGAINST the American People.

    FACT:
    Instead, what the promoter calls the “NASA War Document” is simply her HIGHLY-“MODIFIED” version of an original 2001 power point slide show presentation (WITHOUT THE ACCOMPANYING ORAL COMMENTARY THAT EXPLAINED IT). A NASA scientist created the original power point slide show for his use as a "VISUAL AID" for his ORAL presentation AT A 2001 CONVENTION OF AMERICAN MILITARY CONTRACTORS THAT WERE IN THE BUSINESS OF DEVELOPING COUNTERMEASURES TO POTENTIAL, FUTURE, HIGH-TECH WEAPONS THAT OTHER NATIONS COULD THEORETICALLY DEVELOP IN THE FUTURE TO USE AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (OVER THE NEXT 25 YEARS). The purpose of the original power point slide show presentation was to introduce the thousands of American military contractors in attendance at the convention to such potential, future, high-tech weapons that OTHER NATIONS could theoretically develop for use against the American people over the next 25 years (AS DEPICTED IN THE ORIGINAL POWER POINT PRESENTATION) AND TO ENCOURAGE THOSE AMERICAN MILITARY CONTRACTORS IN ATTENDANCE TO DEVELOP COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST THEM. Nowhere in the subject original document does it imply, suggest or state that NASA itself or the United States Government were developing or using any of these horrific, potential, future weapons AGAINST the American people themselves. THAT FRAUDULENT CLAIM IS THE HOAX!

    ANALYSIS:
    Obviously, the FIRST such military contractors to develop successful COUNTER MEASURES to use AGAINST such theoretical, potential, future, high-tech weapons (as depicted in the original slide show presentation) would be more likely to be awarded profitable government contracts to manufacture them. This is why the thousands of American military contractors in attendance at the convention would have been so interested in this particular subject.

    BACKGROUND:
    Dennis M. Bushnell was NASA's Chief Scientist at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Langley, Virginia. As NASA's chief scientist, Bushnell was an EXPERT on potential, future, high-tech, military technology that OTHER NATIONS could theoretically develop for use against the American people in the future. For this reason, a TRADE ASSOCIATION of American military contractors (which were in the business of developing COUNTERMEASURES to such threats) asked Bushnell to speak at their upcoming CONVENTION. Bushnell created the original power point slide show presentation for his use at that convention.

    The title of the Bushnell’s presentation at the upcoming convention was “FUTURE Strategic Issues/FUTURE Warfare (CIRCA 2025)" (note the YEAR, "2025"). Bushnell first PUBLISHED his original power point slide show presentation TO THE PUBLIC on the “US Department of Defense’s Defense Technical INFORMATION CENTER" website (a PUBLIC website) in July 2001, a month BEFORE the convention at which he was to speak on the subject. (So much for the promoter's “secret” or “leaked” document story.).

    Bushnell actually gave his power point slide show presentation on August 14th, 2001 at the “4th Annual Testing and Training FOR READINESS ["having successful COUNTERMEASURES"] Symposium and Exhibition" which was held at the Rosen Centre Hotel (then, the OMNI Rosen Hotel) in Orlando, Florida. The theme of the convention/symposium/exposition was “EMERGING CHALLENGES [potential FUTURE weapons] AND OPPORTUNITIES ["BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES"] (its REAL name)”. The convention was hosted by the National DEFENSE Industrial Association ("NDIA"), a trade association for American military contractors. It was this group that asked Bushnell to appear at the convention and give a presentation on potential, future, high-tech military technology that OTHER NATIONS could theoretically develop for use against the American people in the future (over the next 25 years).

    FACT:
    PDF metadata (see below) of the promoter’s HIGHLY “MODIFIED” version of the original document indicates that it was actually “CREATED” on “March 27, 2011 (TEN (10) years AFTER Bushnell’s presentation), that it was "CREATED" by the promoter’s co-conspirator in this hoax and that it was “LAST MODIFIED” by the promoter's co-conspirator (means last "CHANGED", “ALTERED” or “RE-WRITTEN”) on January 23, 2013 (TWELVE (12) years after Bushnell’s presentation). The promoter and her co-conspirator made these extensive "MODIFICATIONS" to the original document in order to make the promoter’s HIGHLY "MODIFIED" version FIT THE HOAX they were peddling (“NASA is killing us all with horrific, futuristic, high-tech weapons.”). Not surprisingly, the promoter never disclosed ("revealed") these extensive (AND SECRET) "MODIFICATIONS" to her followers. Needless to say, the truth does not need "MODIFICATION". Only lies need "MODIFICATION".

    FACT:
    Archive.org (which records everything ever posted online) indicates that Bushnell’s original power point slide presentation was posted in the “PUBLIC DOMAIN” FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE on the “US Department of Defense’s Defense Technical INFORMATION CENTER website" (a PUBLIC website). (So much for the promoter's “secret” document story.). Archive.org indicates that the subject original document WAS NEVER POSTED ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE WEB (including any NASA website). This means that the promoter's claim that the subject document was "discovered and downloaded from a NASA website" IS A LIE intended to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people and intended to incite HATRED and VIOLENCE against innocent Americans.

    ANALYSIS:
    The promoter had very good reason for LYING to the American people about the TRUE SOURCE of the original document. If she truthfully admitted that the original document was downloaded from the PUBLIC website of the “US Department of DEFENSE’S DEFENSE Technical INFORMATION CENTER” (a PUBLIC website), then the original document would not appear to be "secret", nefarious or otherwise part of a "conspiracy" to kill us all. This is because, as a general rule, the government does not usually post written proof of its own conspiracies against its own people on ITS OWN PUBLIC “INFORMATION CENTER” WEBSITES).

    CONCLUSION:
    Contrary to the promoter's claims, THE "NASA WAR DOCUMENT" DOES NOT REFLECT AN EFFORT ON THE PART OF NASA (OR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT) TO KILL ALL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WITH HORRIFIC, FUTURISTIC, HIGH-TECH WEAPONS. To the contrary, the ORIGINAL "NASA WAR DOCUMENT" actually reflects an effort on the part of a single NASA scientist (and thousands of American military contractors) TO PROTECT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM POTENTIAL, FUTURE, HIGH-TECH WEAPONS THAT OTHER NATIONS COULD THEORETICALLY DEVELOP FOR USE AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THE FUTURE (AS DEPICTED IN THE ORIGINAL PRESENTATION), exactly backwards to what the promoter claims in her hoax. The promoter of this hoax knew the truth about the subject original document all along, but nevertheless decided to lie to the American people about it anyway. Sadly, this hoax is but a small part of a much larger pattern of fraud on the part of this same promoter to defraud the American people and to thereby incite HATRED and VIOLENCE against innocent Americans.

    SOURCE DOCUMENTS

    ARCHIVE.ORG’S RECORDS ON THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT:
    https://archive.org/details/FutureSt...rfareCirca2025 (SCROLL DOWN TO BELOW THE WINDOW)

    ONLY WEBSITE WHERE THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WAS EVER POSTED (DTIC):
    http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/

    TRADE ASSOCIATION THAT SPONSORED THE SUBJECT CONVENTION (NDIA):
    http://www.ndia.org/Pages/default.aspx

    RECORD OF THE SUBJECT 2001 NDIA CONFERENCE ON THE DTIC WEBSITE:
    http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADM002244

    COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF PDF METADATA OF THE PROMOTER’S HIGHLY-“MODIFIED” VERSION OF THE SUBJECT DOCUMENT (Scroll down and read the comments of senior member, “Flamesong” beginning with the comment posted on “26-06-2013, 09:02 PM” and the following comment posted on “26-06-2013, 09:39 PM”):
    https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...=248938&page=2 (NOTE THAT THIS METADATA REVEALS THE REAL IDENTITY OF THE PROMOTER'S CHARLATAN CO-CONSPIRATOR IN THIS HOAX). Note also that the promoter confirms the REAL IDENTITY of her charlatan co-conspirator in this hoax at 43:10-43:20 in the following video.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (Remember, at 43:10-43:20).





    SIDE NOTE:
    FOR TWO MORE WORLD FAMOUS HOAXES BY ROD CLASS' CHIEF CHARLATAN PARTNER, SCROLL DOWN TO THE "SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS HOAX" & THE "REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN HOAX" AT COMMENT TWENTY TWO (22) BELOW. THEY ARE SIMPLY UNBELIEVABLE! REMEMBER, SCROLL DOWN TO COMMENT 22 BELOW.

    THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX"
    BELOW, THE PROMOTER IS ACTUALLY CAUGHT ON TAPE WHILE ENGAGED IN THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX". In the "Judge DALE Hoax", this promoter and amateur legal theorist, "Rodney DALE Class", disseminated FAKE legal books that revealed FAKE legal information WHICH THEY THEMSELVES ACTUALLY CREATED, but which they fraudulently told the American people were written by an imaginary "retired federal judge" named, "Judge DALE" (which uses Rodney "DALE" Class' middle name, "DALE", as an inside joke on the American people). Jeff Rense is NOT involved in the hoax. Indeed, he is a victim of the hoax.

    TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCES!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05o4CpB9I8g&t=260s (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 2:25-4:00, 5:25-6:15, 9:00-9:20)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 42:10-49:15)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 7:15-7:55, 27:00-27:55, 31:15-33:10, 45:05-46:00, 52:35-53:45, 54:35-54:50)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgYbD6fcw8 (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 34:20-36:00)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAryrdGenL4 (A TRULY OSCAR-WORTHY PERFORMANCE AT 1:30-1:45)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 6:20-6:45, 7:10-7:55, 25:55-26:45)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQeazE8_Ipk (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 51:50-53:00)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81qlF5v3WY8 (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 7:00-7:25)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eei6_4dpK4 (A TRULY OSCAR WORTHY PERFORMANCE at 2:20-2:40).

    THE JUDGE "DALE" FORGERIES (BOOKS):
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE...-ADVENTURE.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....bk-format1.pdf (NOTE THE WEBMASTER OF THIS WEBSITE);
    https://anticorruptionsociety.files....th-edition.pdf (SEE LIST OF AUTHORS AT BOTTOM OF 2ND PAGE).


    ABOUT THE PROMOTER OF THIS HOAX:
    The promoter is Rodney "DALE" Class' partner in the "Judge DALE Hoax" and several other Rod Class hoaxes. She is a well-known, PROFESSIONAL CHARLATAN, HOAXER and SELF-PROMOTER. She does nothing but create, manufacture and publish online hoaxes (her specialty). She has long engaged in a pattern of FORGING FAKE, COUNTERFEIT documents and FRAUDULENTLY attributing those FORGERIES to others (like the federal government or its agencies). When not FORGING her own FAKE, COUNTERFEIT documents for that purpose, she takes documents written by others THAT SHE KNOWS TO BE POLITICAL "FICTION" and FRAUDULENTLY tells her followers that they are REAL documents written by "GOVERNMENT INSIDERS". Like all of Rod Class' claims, all of the claims of this promoter are intended to incite HATED and VIOLENCE against innocent Americans and against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and our Republican form of government.

    This woman is behind ALL THREE of the "Judge DALE forgeries" (all of which she co-wrote with Rod Class), including "The Matrix And The US Constitution" (2010), The Great American Adventure: Secrets of America" (2012) & "Lawfully Yours" (2014), the "Judge DALE Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "All Government Agencies Are 'Private Entities' [or 'Private Contractors'] Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "Court Registry Investment System Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "Federal Government Is A Private, For-Profit Corporation Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "B.A.R. Card Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "'Esquire' Is A Title Of Nobility [Royalty] Hoax" (with Rod Class), the "British Accreditation Registry Hoax [B.A.R. Hoax]" (with Rod Class), the "NASA War Document Hoax", the "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax", the "Report From Iron Mountain Hoax", the "FAKE Jim Traficant Speech Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes, all of which she uses to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
    Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm the promoter. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for the promoter's role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

    The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 3rd March 2018 at 23:43.

  23. Link to Post #20
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th September 2015
    Age
    45
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Rod Class & his many hoaxes

    Bill,

    Thanks for the tip on Sean David Morton and the "Income Tax is Voluntary" article.

    I'll look into them.

    Sounds like they are right up my alley. LOL!

    Best Regards,

    Snoop

    NOTICE: THIS THREAD IS CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Last edited by snoop4truth; 30th December 2017 at 16:09.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts